I have a private method in my controller. which is used for some database update. this method i am calling from another controller method. and it works fine.
But when i am trying to write a test case for that method then It is tripping on accessing (session variable and params) in my functional all other methods are working fine the problem is only with private method?
In my setup method in functional test, I am setting session also.?
Currently in my tests I do something like this to test if an email is queued to be sent
assert_difference('ActionMailer::Base.deliveries.size', 1) do
get :create_from_spreedly, {:user_id => @logged_in_user.id}
end
but if i a controller action can send two different emails i.e. one to the user if sign up goes fine or a notification to admin if something went wrong - how can i test which one actually got sent. The code above would pass regardless.
Proxy configuration of a machine can be easily fetched using
def check_proxy():
import urllib2
http_proxy = urllib2.getproxies().get('http')
I need to write a test for the above written function. In order to do that I need to:-
Set the system-wide proxy to an
invalid URL during the test(sounds
like a bad idea).
Supply an invalid
URL to http_proxy.
How can I achieve either of the above?
I have a private method in my controller. which is used for some database update. this method i am calling from another controller method. and it works fine.
But when i am trying to write a test case for that method then It is tripping on accessing (session variable and params) in my functional all other methods are working fine the problem is only with private method?
In my setup method in functional test, I am setting session also.?
i.e. as I compose my test suites to include other suites as well as testcases,
is there a global count of how many tests the TestRunner has executed, will be executing?
Any way I can progammatically access that count?
We do not use a Maven
framework in our environments. Can you suggest a way to use the Jersey
test framework for testing the Rest web services? I have tried to override the TestContaioner and TestContainerFactory interfaces to set up an AppDescriptor but I fail to understand how to set the LowLevelDescriptor to use the HTTPContainerFactory instead of the default one. I tried also settign the System property jersey.test.containerFactory. Does not work?Any ideas?
I'm brand new to Ruby testing and Google isn't helping.
Using Test/Unit, how can I print an instance variable, like
test "thing to happen" do
do_stuff
assert_equal "foo", @variable
p @varible
end
I follow this tutorial here to create RESTful web service on Netbean 6.8. However, when I right click on the project node and select Test RESTful Web Service, the browser pop up, and supposedly my project would be listed on the left, and supposedly I would be able to select it, and test against various function that listed on the right. However, I dont see any of that. Any idea why?
Hi,
what test data approach/framework is recommended for .net unit testing? I'm in VS2010, C#, doing business logic layer testing.
By approaches I mean like: creating database snapshots, programmatically creating each time, etc etc. Like what approach to use to ensure at the start of each test the database is in a known state.
Can anybody explain why load test result on Graph are different form load test result on Table Page. If compare Min and Avg page response time they are the same. But if we compare figures in Max column they are different for the same page and the same load rest run.
see linked images for more details.
http://cid-ee8b34c203174724.skydrive.live.com/self.aspx/.Public/3.png
The connection string in my app.config for my C# project looks like
Data Source=.\SQLEXPRESS;AttachDbFilename='|DataDirectory|\EIC.mdf';Integrated Security=True;User Instance=True"
I am writing unit tests for the project and have the set the test run configuration to copy the EIC.mdf, but I do am not able to reference the Deployed copy of EIC.mdf to be referenced by the app.config I created for the test project. If I set it to
Data Source=.\SQLEXPRESS;AttachDbFilename='EIC.mdf';Integrated Security=True;User Instance=True"
It still does not find the mdf file.
Seems a great C++ unit testing framework. I'm just wanting something a bit more sophisticated than the console output for running the test, also something that makes it really easy to run specific tests (since gtest supports all kinds of test filtering)
If there is nothing, I'll probably roll my own
I utilize the standard python logging module. When I call python manage.py test I'd like to disable logging before all the tests are ran. Is there a signal or some other kind of hook I could use to call logging.disable? Or is there some other way to disable logging when python manage.py test is ran?
I want to test how priorities are working in the delayed_job plugin. Im using the mailit app from railscasts. I think i want to send 100 messages with a high priority and 100 with a lower priority. And i want to see if the messages with a lower priority will be delivered on time or they will be put aside.
How can i do a test like this.
I'm sure I'm missing something simple. bar gets autowired in the junit test, but why doesn't bar inside foo get autowired?
@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
@ContextConfiguration({"beans.xml"})
public class BarTest {
@Autowired
Object bar;
@Test
public void testBar() throws Exception {
//this works
assertEquals("expected", bar.someMethod());
//this doesn't work, because the bar object inside foo isn't autowired?
Foo foo = new Foo();
assertEquals("expected", foo.someMethodThatUsesBar());
}
}
I would like to test if an instance variable lies in a range of numbers. I solved the problem by using assert_in_delta but would like to know if there is a formal assertion for this.
#part of the tested class
def initialize(value = 70 + rand(30))
@value = value
end
#test_value.rb
class ValueTestCase < Test::Unit::TestCase
def test_if_value_in_range
assert_in_delta(85, p.value, 15)
end
end
I am building an Android hello world application in Netbeans. It's building properly and I am to run in the emulator also.
But when creating and running the Junit test and running the test I get a java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError.
How can I fix this problem?
Can somebody give me a link to PKCS#11 test suite? This may be a simple utility or part of big project no matter.
I now only this one: Netscape PKCS #11 Test Suites
hello.
What is the pythonic way to test if there is a tuple starting with another tuple in collection? actually, I am really after the index of match, but I can probably figure out from test example
for example:
c = ((0,1),(2,3))
# (0,) should match first element, (3,)should match no element
I should add my python is 2.4 and/or 2.5
thanks
I use apache common lang to unescape a block of html text which contains ,
I want to filter out blocks that contains only whitespaces.
But I can't test the as a whitespace. It's not in the normal whitespace list(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitespace_character), and I try to print its Hex form by calling Character.getNumericValue which return -1.
  should be a whitespace,isn't? But How can I test it?
I recently start playing with Openshift and I am wondering if there is a way to deploy ( test) your application on local host before you upload it on openshift.
Thing is that every time I make change on the code, it takes some time to push it to openshift and check if it works.
Google app engine SDK ( for Eclipse), for example, includes a web server application (app engine simulator) that allows you to test your app locally before you deploy on google.
thnx
Fotis
Hi,
Is it possible to JUnit test if wiring by Spring is succesfully?
I would like to do this by reflection. Like: get all beans with id *Controller and test if the fields *services are not null?
Thank you!
Is there a way to know when code is being called from running a test method?
bool MyMethod()
{
if ( /* are we running a test? */ )
{
return true; // otherwise this will fail from the automated build script
}
else
{
// run the proper code
}
}
and please spare me the "this is a really bad idea" comments :)