Search Results

Search found 13776 results on 552 pages for 'python appengine'.

Page 410/552 | < Previous Page | 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417  | Next Page >

  • Do not match if word appears in regex

    - by David542
    I have a url, and I want it to NOT match if the word 'season' is contained in the url. Here are two examples: CONTAINS SEASON, DO NOT MATCH 'http://imdb.com/title/tt0285331/episodes?this=1&season=7&ref_=tt_eps_sn_7' DOES NOT CONTAIN SEASON, MATCH 'http://imdb.com/title/tt0285331/ Here is what I have so far, but I'm afraid the .+ will match everything until the end. What would be the correct regex to use here? r'http://imdb.com/title/tt(\d)+/.+^[season].+'

    Read the article

  • Yet another list comprehension question

    - by relima
    I had this: if Setting["Language"] == "en": f.m_radioBox3.SetSelection(0) elif Setting["Language"] == "pt": f.m_radioBox3.SetSelection(1) elif Setting["Language"] == "fr": f.m_radioBox3.SetSelection(2) elif Setting["Language"] == "es": f.m_radioBox3.SetSelection(3) Then I did this: Linguas = ["en","pt","fr","es"] a = 0 for i in Linguas: if i == Setting["Language"]: f.m_radioBox3.SetSelection(a) a += 1 Is it possible to further simplify this and make it into a one-liner?

    Read the article

  • Google App Engine: Update model definitons?

    - by Rosarch
    I recently updated one of my models by adding a db.ListProperty(): class DependencyArcTail(db.Model): courses = db.ListProperty(db.Key) ''' newly added ''' forwardLinks = db.ListProperty(db.Key) However, I can't seem to get this to be reflected in the SDK dashboard. I cleared the datastore and reloaded it. Then I ran the procedures that create the DependencyArcTail objects. However, forwardLinks still doesn't show up as an attribute in the SDK dashboard. What's happening?

    Read the article

  • does webapp has 'elseif' or 'elif' in template tags..

    - by zjm1126
    my code is : Hello!~~~ {% if user %} <p>Logged in as {{ user.first_name }} {{ user.last_name }}.</p> {% elif openid_user%} <p>Hello, {{openid_user.nickname}}! Do you want to <a href="{{openid_logout_url}}">Log out?</p> {% else %} <p><a href="/login?redirect={{ current_url }}">google Log in</a>.</p> <p><a href="/twitter">twitter Log in</a>.</p> <p><a href="/facebook">facebook Log in</a>.</p> <p><a href="{{openid_login_url}}">openid Log in</a>.</p> <iframe src="/_openid/login?continue=/"></iframe> {% endif %} the error is : TemplateSyntaxError: Invalid block tag: 'elif' does not webapp has a 'else if ' ? thanks

    Read the article

  • Conditional CellRenderCombo in pyGTK TreeView

    - by Präriewolf
    I have a two column TreeView attached to a ListStore. Both columns are CellRenderCombo combo boxes. When the user selects an entry in the first box, I need to dynamically load a set of options in the second. For example, the behavior I want is: On row 0, the user selects "Alphabet" in the first column box. The second column box is populated with the letters "A-Z". On row 1, the user selects "Numbers" in the first column box. The second column box is populated with the numbers "0-9". On row 2, the user selects "Alphabet" in the first column box. The second column box is populated with the letters "A-Z". etc. Does anyone know how to do this, or seen any open source pygtk or gtk projects that have similar behavior which I can analyze?

    Read the article

  • Object for storing strings geted from prints

    - by evg
    class MyWriter: def __init__(self, stdout): self.stdout = stdout self.dumps = [] def write(self, text): self.stdout.write(smart_unicode(text).encode('cp1251')) self.dumps.append(text) def close(self): self.stdout.close() writer = MyWriter(sys.stdout) save = sys.stdout sys.stdout = writer I use self.dumps list to store geted data from prints. Is it exists more convinient object for storing string lines in memory? ideally i want dump it to one big string. I can get it like this "\n".join(self.dumps) from code above. Mb it's better to just concat strings - self.dumps += text ?

    Read the article

  • How i can do image CROP in OpenCV

    - by Nolik
    How i can do image crop such in PIL in OpenCV. Working example on PIL im = Image.open('0.png').convert('L') im = im.crop((1, 1, 98, 33)) im.save('_0.png') But how i can do it on OpenCV? I wanted to do so im = cv.imread('0.png', cv.CV_LOAD_IMAGE_GRAYSCALE) (thresh, im_bw) = cv.threshold(im, 128, 255, cv.THRESH_OTSU) im = cv.getRectSubPix(im_bw, (98, 33), (1, 1)) cv.imshow('Img', im) cv.waitKey(0) But it doesnt work. I think, i wrong use getRectSubPix. If it true, please explain how i can correctly use this function. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Crossed import in django

    - by Kuhtraphalji
    On example, i have 2 apps: alpha and beta in alpha/models.py import of model from beta.models and in beta/models.py import of model from alpha.models manage.py validate says that ImportError: cannot import name ModelName how to solve this problem?

    Read the article

  • Django ForeignKey _set on an inherited model

    - by neolaser
    I have two models Category and Entry. There is another model ExtEntry that inherits from Entry class Category(models.Model): title = models.CharField('title', max_length=255) description = models.TextField('description', blank=True) ... class Entry(models.Model): title = models.CharField('title', max_length=255) categories = models.ManyToManyField(Category) ... class ExtEntry(Entry): groups= models.CharField('title', max_length=255) value= models.CharField('title', max_length=255) ... I am able to use the Category.entry_set but I want to be able to do Category.blogentry_set but it is not available. If this is not available,then I need another method to get all ExtEntryrelated to one particular Category Thanks

    Read the article

  • Django - Expression based model constraints

    - by rtmie
    Is it possible to set an expression based constraint on a django model object, e.g. If I want to impose a constraint where an owner can have only one widget of a given type that is not in an expired state, but can have as many others as long as they are expired. Obviously I can do this by overriding the save method, but I am wondering if it can be done by setting constraints, e.g. some derivative of the unique_together constraint WIDGET_STATE_CHOICES = ( ('NEW', 'NEW'), ('ACTIVE', 'ACTIVE'), ('EXPIRED', 'EXPIRED') ) class MyWidget(models.Model): owner = models.CharField(max_length=64) widget_type = models.CharField(max_length = 10) widget_state = models.CharField(max_length = 10, choices = WIDGET_STATE_CHOICES) #I'd like to be able to do something like class Meta: unique_together = (("owner","widget_type","widget_state" != 'EXPIRED')

    Read the article

  • Django model class and custom property

    - by dArignac
    Howdy - today a weird problem occured to me: I have a modle class in Django and added a custom property to it that shall not be saved into the database and therefore is not represent in the models structure: class Category(models.Model): groups = models.ManyToManyField(Group) title = defaultdict() Now, when I'm within the shell or writing a test and I do the following: c1 = Category.objects.create() c1.title['de'] = 'german title' print c1.title['de'] # prints "german title" c2 = Category.objects.create() print c2.title['de'] # prints "german title" <-- WTF? It seems that 'title' is kind of global. If I change title to a simple string it works as expected, so it has to do something with the dict? I also tried setting title as a property: title = property(_title) But that did not work, too. So, how can I solve this? Thank you in advance! enter code here

    Read the article

  • Decorator that can take both init args and call args?

    - by digitala
    Is it possible to create a decorator which can be __init__'d with a set of arguments, then later have methods called with other arguments? For instance: from foo import MyDecorator bar = MyDecorator(debug=True) @bar.myfunc(a=100) def spam(): pass @bar.myotherfunc(x=False) def eggs(): pass If this is possible, can you provide a working example?

    Read the article

  • Django & custom auth backend (web service) + no database. How to save stuff in session?

    - by Infinity
    I've been searching here and there, and based on this answer I've put together what you see below. It works, but I need to put some stuff in the user's session, right there inside authenticate. How would I store acme_token in the user's session, so that it will get cleared if they logged out? class AcmeUserBackend(object): # Create a User object if not already in the database? create_unknown_user = False def get_user(self, username): return AcmeUser(id=username) def authenticate(self, username=None, password=None): """ Check the username/password and return an AcmeUser. """ acme_token = ask_another_site_about_creds(username, password) if acme_token: return AcmeUser(id=username) return None ################## from django.contrib.auth.models import User class AcmeUser(User): objects = None # we cannot really use this w/o local DB def save(self): """saving to DB disabled""" pass def get_group_permissions(self): """If you don't make your own permissions module, the default also will use the DB. Throw it away""" return [] # likewise with the other permission defs def get_and_delete_messages(self): """Messages are stored in the DB. Darn!""" return []

    Read the article

  • List filtering: list comprehension vs. lambda + filter

    - by Agos
    I happened to find myself having a basic filtering need: I have a list and I have to filter it by an attribute of the items. My code looked like this: list = [i for i in list if i.attribute == value] But then i thought, wouldn't it be better to write it like this? filter(lambda x: x.attribute == value, list) It's more readable, and if needed for performance the lambda could be taken out to gain something. Question is: are there any caveats in using the second way? Any performance difference? Am I missing the Pythonic Way™ entirely and should do it in yet another way (such as using itemgetter instead of the lambda)? Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Finding a Eulerian Tour

    - by user590903
    I am trying to solve a problem on Udacity described as follows: # Find Eulerian Tour # # Write a function that takes in a graph # represented as a list of tuples # and return a list of nodes that # you would follow on an Eulerian Tour # # For example, if the input graph was # [(1, 2), (2, 3), (3, 1)] # A possible Eulerian tour would be [1, 2, 3, 1] I came up with the following solution, which, while not as elegant as some of the recursive algorithms, does seem to work within my test case. def find_eulerian_tour(graph): tour = [] start_vertex = graph[0][0] tour.append(start_vertex) while len(graph) > 0: current_vertex = tour[len(tour) - 1] for edge in graph: if current_vertex in edge: if edge[0] == current_vertex: current_vertex = edge[1] else: current_vertex = edge[0] graph.remove(edge) tour.append(current_vertex) break return tour graph = [(1, 2), (2, 3), (3, 1)] print find_eulerian_tour(graph) >> [1, 2, 3, 1] However, when submitting this, I get rejected by the grader. I am doing something wrong? I can't see any errors.

    Read the article

  • Programmatic binding of accelerators in wxPython

    - by Inductiveload
    I am trying to programmatically create and bind a table of accelerators in wxPython in a loop so that I don't need to worry about getting and assigning new IDs to each accelerators (and with a view to inhaling the handler list from some external resource, rather than hard-coding them). I also pass in some arguments to the handler via a lambda since a lot of my handlers will be the same but with different parameters (move, zoom, etc). The class is subclassed from wx.Frame and setup_accelerators() is called during initialisation. def setup_accelerators(self): bindings = [ (wx.ACCEL_CTRL, wx.WXK_UP, self.on_move, 'up'), (wx.ACCEL_CTRL, wx.WXK_DOWN, self.on_move, 'down'), (wx.ACCEL_CTRL, wx.WXK_LEFT, self.on_move, 'left'), (wx.ACCEL_CTRL, wx.WXK_RIGHT, self.on_move, 'right'), ] accelEntries = [] for binding in bindings: eventId = wx.NewId() accelEntries.append( (binding[0], binding[1], eventId) ) self.Bind(wx.EVT_MENU, lambda event: binding[2](event, binding[3]), id=eventId) accelTable = wx.AcceleratorTable(accelEntries) self.SetAcceleratorTable(accelTable) def on_move(self, e, direction): print direction However, this appears to bind all the accelerators to the last entry, so that Ctrl+Up prints "right", as do all the other three. How to correctly bind multiple handlers in this way?

    Read the article

  • muti user dungeon help

    - by mudman
    ive created a single user dungeon which i would like to create into a multi user dungoen so at least two plays can play how would i do that what code do i need to add can anyone help? i would show coding but if i do then everyone would see it and all my work will be copied as i know other students do use this site to so plz understand my situation and yes this is a homework/assignment work.

    Read the article

  • Django Save Incomplete Progress on Form

    - by jimbob
    I have a django webapp with multiple users logging in and fill in a form. Some users may start filling in a form and lack some required data (e.g., a grant #) needed to validate the form (and before we can start working on it). I want them to be able to fill out the form and have an option to save the partial info (so another day they can log back in and complete it) or submit the full info undergoing validation. Currently I'm using ModelForm for all the forms I use, and the Model has constraints to ensure valid data (e.g., the grant # has to be unique). However, I want them to be able to save this intermediary data without undergoing any validation. The solution I've thought of seems rather inelegant and un-django-ey: create a "Save Partial Form" button that saves the POST dictionary converts it to a shelf file and create a "SavedPartialForm" model connecting the user to partial forms saved in the shelf. Does this seem sensible? Is there a better way to save the POST dict directly into the db? Or is an add-on module that does this partial-save of a form (which seems to be a fairly common activity with webforms)? My biggest concern with my method is I want to eventually be able to do this form-autosave automatically (say every 10 minutes) in some ajax/jquery method without actually pressing a button and sending the POST request (e.g., so the user isn't redirected off the page when autosave is triggered). I'm not that familiar with jquery and am wondering if it would be possible to do this.

    Read the article

  • How do I attach event bindings to items on a canvas using Tkinter?

    - by Ian
    If I'm using a canvas to display data and I want the user to be able to click on various items on the canvas in order to get more information or interact with it in some way, whats the best way of going about this? Searching online I can find information about how to bind events to tags but that seems to be more indirect then what I want. I don't want to group items with tags, but rather have specific function calls when the user clicks specific items on the canvas.

    Read the article

  • How to merge or copy anonymous session data into user data when user logs in?

    - by benhoyt
    This is a general question, or perhaps a request for pointers to other open source projects to look at: I'm wondering how people merge an anonymous user's session data into the authenticated user data when a user logs in. For example, someone is browsing around your websites saving various items as favourites. He's not logged in, so they're saved to an anonymous user's data. Then he logs in, and we need to merge all that data into their (possibly existing) user data. Is this done different ways in an ad-hoc fashion for different applications? Or are there some best practices or other projects people can direct me to?

    Read the article

  • List comprehension, map, and numpy.vectorize performance

    - by mcstrother
    I have a function foo(i) that takes an integer and takes a significant amount of time to execute. Will there be a significant performance difference between any of the following ways of initializing a: a = [foo(i) for i in xrange(100)] a = map(foo, range(100)) vfoo = numpy.vectorize(foo) a = vfoo(range(100)) (I don't care whether the output is a list or a numpy array.) Is there a better way?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417  | Next Page >