Search Results

Search found 22122 results on 885 pages for 'google alerts'.

Page 419/885 | < Previous Page | 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426  | Next Page >

  • We have a 200% increase of "organic" search traffic - how to figure out which keyword is causing this?

    - by Robert Grezan
    So our Google Analytics are showing us that 200% increase of "organic" search traffic. Analytics are saying that search keyword is "(not provided)". We are wondering how to find out which keyword is causing this? We are monitoring all important keywords for our website. None of keyword is in first 5, so our "organic" serach traffic is modest. However, today we received 200% increase of "organic" search traffic but none of keywords we can think of moved a bit. We also did not change anything related to SEO. And what is interesting Google Webmaster shows no changes - ~2500 impressions and ~200 clicks. How to find out which "keyword" might be causing this spike?

    Read the article

  • Best Option for Creating A Small Church Website

    - by Jim
    I've been asked to create a website for a small church. Their prior site was hosted on geocities which is no longer. They are not looking for anything robust, just an informational site with a calendar and maybe a contact form. The church would also like to be able to administer the site with little technical know-how. Cost is also an issue. Given these requirements, something like sites.google.com seems like a good option. However, my main concern is that Sites will suffer the same fate as geocities. It is definitely not a flagship Google product. Are there other good alternatives that fit the requirements?

    Read the article

  • Separate urls for a set of pages sharing 80% duplicate content

    - by user131003
    Issue: Currently my site has one particular page which has country specific data. So I've URLs like : mysite.com/sale-united-states mysite.com/sale-united-kingdom mysite.com/sale-sweden etc. All these pages have 80-90% common content and 10-20% country specific content. currently all these pages canonically point to mysite.com/sale-united-states. The problem is when someone searches for "sale Sweden", Google correctly shows mysite.com/sale-united-states page, which does not feel correct as it shows US page instead of Sweden. Now I'm thinking of not using canonical url so that country specific urls are produced in Google saerch. But I'm not sure how 80% duplicate content is going to affect SEO? What should be the recommended approach for this situation? A friend of mine suggested a "separate subdomain per country" based approach but it seems overkill for one page.

    Read the article

  • More confusion over SEO Cname and 301 redirect

    - by Alasdair
    Previous answers on this topic don't really help me with my query, so any help appreciated for a bit of a newbie. I have a new domain "domain#1.mobi" Its hosted with godaddy and has a cname and forwarding, pointing it to "domain#1.elsewhere.us" It has no content. The content is all hosted on "domain#1.elsewhere.us" which is what Google is now listing in its results. I want Google to ignore that and only list "domain#1.mobi" in its listings. How do I achieve this?

    Read the article

  • I have a large number of links on every page, for design reasons I want to keep it but is it hurting my SEO

    - by Callum Rexter
    The site is http://www.centralsaddlery.co.uk We have other issues which we are tackling in terms of content etc but the question I have is: "Is my main navigation hurting us in SEO?" Its a lot of links and it's on a lot of pages. If so - what is a way to get google to ignore links below the top level. I had thought google would see that the links are hidden by default and only shown on hover but I can't verify this at all. We absolutely want to keep the menu, our customers like it and so do we - we think it is pretty usable as we have a lot of products to look at. Any advice is appreciated (and any tips for any part of the SEO are welcome too)

    Read the article

  • with dash or not in domain [closed]

    - by menardmam
    Possible Duplicate: Is it better to put hyphens in a domain name ? I have to buy a domain it can be : somebigcompany.com or some-big-company.com I know, it's not a sample answer... but i like to know your point of view... the client what with no dash, i think for Google, and readability the dash is better... i have talk to a expert SEO that sait since panda update of the google algorithm it will be punish to have dash.. i don't believe it ! after your answer, i go to godaddy to buy it thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • .NET serait le framework le plus populaire devant GWT, d'après une étude remise en cause par le créa

    .NET serait le framework le plus populaire Devant GWT, d'après une étude remise en cause par le créateur de Rails Evans Data vient de publier un classements des principaux frameworks utilisés par les développeur. Baptisée « Users' Choice Survey on Frameworks » l'étude souligne que la facilité d'utilisation est visiblement un facteur prépondérant pour les programmeurs. Arrivé premier des réponses de plus de 400 développeurs, .NET de Microsoft devance le Google's App Engine et le Google Web Toolkit. A l'autre bout du classement, Rails serait très mal noté. Le support et la réactivité de la communauté seraient la principale cause de ce mauva...

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu pense à remplacer Firefox par Chromium dans sa distribution pour Netbooks : voteriez-vous pou

    Ubuntu teste Chromium pour remplacer Firefox Dans sa future distribution pour Netbooks : voteriez-vous pour Google ou pour Mozilla ? Ubuntu envisage d'abandonner Firefox pour sa version Netbook et de le remplacer par Chromium, l'implémentation libre du navigateur de Google. La décision n'est pas encore définitive. Mais elle indique clairement que l'équipe de développement de la distribution Linux la plus connue du grand public est en train de se lasser des « lourdeurs » du navigateur de Mozilla. C'est en tout cas l'idée exprimée lors depuis quelques temps déjà : « Firefox est un navigateur web assez lourd qui souffre de performances insuffisamment optimisé...

    Read the article

  • How frequently Googlebot fetch sitemaps? Is it depending on page rank?

    - by JITHIN JOSE
    How much frequently google fetches sitemaps? I am now working with a high traffic website normally have 30 new posts per minute.But currently it provides sitemaps which links to new 100 posts(3 minutes). Is this method is enough ?. Is Bots fetch sitemaps every 3 minutes?. Did need to change sitemaps to list all 5M posts(indexed sitemaps)?. How this change will effect on traffic and page rank. Is google bot remove urls that previously listed on sitemap but not now?

    Read the article

  • Do search engines crawl PDFs and if so are there any rules to follow when making them

    - by RandomBen
    The website I am working on has a few hundred PDFs in it. I don't think I have ever seen any of them come back in a search but there are linked to directly from out site. They are also full of keywords because they are product documents. Is there anything special we need to do to get Google or other search engines to crawl them? Is there any hard and fast rules for making PDFs to help Google like them more? For instance should I run them through ghostscript to clean up broken PDF tags that Adobe creates during generation?

    Read the article

  • Justice : Apple s'attaque à Android 4.1 dans un deuxième procès contre Samsung

    Justice : Apple s'attaque directement à Android 4.1 Dans un deuxième procès qui l'oppose à Samsung Combien de fois avons-nous lu, dans certains commentaires de nos articles qui traitent des procès qu'Apple intente aux constructeurs qui lancent des modèles sous Android, que Google et son OS mobile n'étaient pas visés ? Nous avions beau expliquer que c'était bien Android qui était dans la ligne de mire d'Apple (ce qui est d'ailleurs l'analyse de Google), pour certains, nous ne faisions qu'extrapoler pour jeter le doute dans l'esprit des développeurs de cette plateforme. Que ceux-là veuillent bien nous excuser. Apple assigne aujourd'hui Android 4.1 en justice. ...

    Read the article

  • Website signaled as containing malware

    - by Bakaburg
    I've got a nasty problem with one of our websites. It has been signaled to us by Google and other agencies that it contains malware. We weren't able to understand how to cope with the problem. Could anyone drive us in the right direction? UPDATE: I used google webmaster tools to review the suspicious website. And now it says it's ok! Even if I didn't change anything! How could it be? false alarm?

    Read the article

  • Why subdomains of Blogspot/WordPress like sites are treated as different domains or sites?

    - by Thedijje
    As I know, maps.google.com or mail.google.com all comes under the same domain and its all are subdomain. Entire web treats these subdomain as the part of main domain and they have same Alexa rank, PageRank and all. But in another hand, take a look on blogspot.com/wordpress.com/webs.com; these are different sites but blogs or websites under those domains are treated as different sites. Its new URL, all have different PageRank and Alexa rank as well. Tts about millions of subdomains under those few domain, have almost similar IP address, hosting and CMS, still why they are called different domains?

    Read the article

  • SPF record doesn't work (not sure which DNS server to tweak)

    - by Ion
    Problem: Google (and perhaps others) marks our emails as SPF neutral. Let me give you some background about the setup: initially got a dedicated server (Hetzner) with Plesk installed to host a domain/web application, let's say: bigjaws.com. Plesk automatically creates a DNS zone for it with some records for the various services it provides out of the box, e.g. webmail.bigjaws.com as a CNAME to bigjaws.com to provide Horde/whatever, etc. Let me point out four relevant of these records (where XXX.XXX.XXX.158 is our dedicated IP): bigjaws.com. A XXX.XXX.XXX.158 mail.bigjaws.com. A XXX.XXX.XXX.158 bigjaws.com MX (10) mail.bigjaws.com. bigjaws.com. TXT v=spf1 +a +mx -all The above records are not(?) valid anymore though, because after using this dedicated server for a while, our site got bigger and bigger so we decided to move our operations over to AWS (EC2, RDS, ELB, etc), but we retained the mail functionality as is, i.e. emails from [email protected] are sent by connecting to our dedicated server where Plesk takes care of things. This was decided in order not to setup anything from scratch. Of course for all DNS-related things we now use Route53. In Route53 I have the following records: mail.schoox.com. A XXX.XXX.XXX.158 bigjaws.com. MX (10) mail.bigjaws.com bigjaws.com. SPF "v=spf1 +ip4:XXX.XXX.XXX.158 +mx ~all" From my understanding of SPF, the SPF status should have been passed: I designate that all email being sent by bigjaws.com from XXX.XXX.XXX.158 are valid/not spam (I added +mx there but I'm not sure if needed). When a mail server receives an email, doesn't it lookup the SPF record of the domain and checks against the IP it got the email from? Checking with spfquery: root@box:~# spfquery -ip XXX.XXX.XXX.158 -sender [email protected] -rcpt-to [email protected] StartError Context: Failed to query MAIL-FROM ErrorCode: (2) Could not find a valid SPF record Error: No DNS data for 'bigjaws.com'. EndError noneneutral Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?id=employee1%40bigjaws.com&ip=XXX.XXX.XXX.158&receiver=spfquery : Reason: default spfquery: XXX.XXX.XXX.158 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of bigjaws.com Received-SPF: neutral (spfquery: XXX.XXX.XXX.158 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of bigjaws.com) client-ip=XXX.XXX.XXX.158; [email protected]; If I go to the address listed above (openspf.org) it tells me that the message should have been accepted(!): spfquery rejected a message that claimed an envelope sender address of [email protected]. spfquery received a message from static.158.XXX.XXX.XXX.clients.your-server.de (XXX.XXX.XXX.158) that claimed an envelope sender address of [email protected]. The domain bigjaws.com has authorized static.158.XXX.XXX.XXX.clients.your-server.de (XXX.XXX.XXX.158) to send mail on its behalf, so the message should have been accepted. It is impossible for us to say why it was rejected. What should I do? If the problem persists, contact the bigjaws.com postmaster. Also, here are some headers from an email sent by one of our [email protected] addresses to a gmail.com address (by the way, bigjaws.de listed in the "Received: from" field was the initial domain hosted on the dedicated server before adding the .com one -- both are still listed as separate subscriptions under Plesk). Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: by 10.14.177.70 with SMTP id c46csp289656eem; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 01:11:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.14.102.66 with SMTP id c42mr306186eeg.47.1382515860386; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 01:11:00 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from bigjaws.de (static.158.XXX.XXX.XXX.clients.your-server.de. [XXX.XXX.XXX.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l4si19438578eew.161.2013.10.23.01.10.59 for <[email protected]> (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Oct 2013 01:10:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: XXX.XXX.XXX.158 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) client-ip=XXX.XXX.XXX.158; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: XXX.XXX.XXX.158 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) [email protected] DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=bigjaws.com; b=WwRAS0WKjp9lO17iMluYPXOHzqRcOueiQT4rPdvy3WFf0QzoXiy6rLfxU/Ra53jL1vlPbwlLNa5gjoJBi7ZwKfUcvs3s02hJI7b3ozl0fEgJtTPKoCfnwl4bLPbtXNFu; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; Received: (qmail 22722 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2013 10:10:59 +0200 Received: from hostname.static.ISP.com (HELO ?192.168.1.60?) (YYY.YYY.ISP.IP) by static.158.XXX.XXX.XXX.clients.your-server.de. with ESMTPSA (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 23 Oct 2013 10:10:59 +0200 Message-ID: <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:11:00 +0300 From: BigJaws Employee <[email protected]> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [email protected] Subject: test SPF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit test SPF Any ideas why SPF is not working correctly? Also, are there any DNS settings that are not needed anymore and create a problem?

    Read the article

  • navigation menus and SEO

    - by Rodolfo
    I've always have my doubts about navigation menus effect on SEO. You know, the vertical menus on the top that show in every page in the site linking to main sections and subsections. My issue is that if not done dynamically (i.e. after page is loaded or something), from a search engine's point of view it probably looks like a whole bunch of links in the beginning of the page, and links that probably have nothing to do with the page being analyzed, so it's probably not only confusing it, but also giving link 'juice' to the wrong pages or reducing its value. When I've asked SEO people about this, I usually get a "Google is smart, they'll recognize it as a menu and ignore it" response, but I'm not convinced (and the 'Google is smart' argument sounds almost like religion discussion to me). So does it affect SEO negatively or not? Are there any official posts on this topic?

    Read the article

  • This Week in Geek History: YouTube goes Public, Blu-ray vs. HD DVD, and All Your Base Are Belong To Us

    - by Jason Fitzpatrick
    Every week we bring you a snapshot of the current week in the history of technological and geeky endeavors. This week we’re taking a look at the birth of YouTube, the death of the HD DVD format, and the first mega meme. Latest Features How-To Geek ETC How to Enable User-Specific Wireless Networks in Windows 7 How to Use Google Chrome as Your Default PDF Reader (the Easy Way) How To Remove People and Objects From Photographs In Photoshop Ask How-To Geek: How Can I Monitor My Bandwidth Usage? Internet Explorer 9 RC Now Available: Here’s the Most Interesting New Stuff Here’s a Super Simple Trick to Defeating Fake Anti-Virus Malware The Citroen GT – An Awesome Video Game Car Brought to Life [Video] Final Man vs. Machine Round of Jeopardy Unfolds; Watson Dominates Give Chromium-Based Browser Desktop Notifications a Native System Look in Ubuntu Chrome Time Track Is a Simple Task Time Tracker Google Sky Map Turns Your Android Phone into a Digital Telescope Walking Through a Seaside Village Wallpaper

    Read the article

  • Is it illegal to use content in such a way?

    - by MHZ
    I have a couple of questions about the legality of the content of some websites. I am currently working on two websites and I would like to make sure I am not breaking any laws, by using some content like I am... Do I need to get a license to use images from the Internet (such as google.images.com) in my site, assuming they aren't a company logo belonging to another company? If not, am I allowed to use it after I modify it with a image editing software? If content such as phone numbers, e-mail addresses, website addresses, and text from websites can be found for free online, and I gather this information for a search engine based site that I am working on and offering this information on a paid basis (similar to google, but more specialized), is something that is legal? Note: I am not 'copying' or redirecting business from anywhere, to my site. The exact opposite, the site I am working on actually helps advertise businesses and make it easier for customers to find them.

    Read the article

  • How to use rel=canonical with Sitecore aliases?

    - by Mike G
    I have inherited a Sitecore architecture that is a mess from an SEO duplicate content POV. There are multiple aliases that have been created (and indexed by the search engines) for many of the 2nd tier pages of the site. Due to server issues, I am not able to 301 redirect these duped pages, so I would like to use the rel=canonical tag in an attempt to try and get Google/Bing to recognize the correct pages I would like to appear in the index. I have blocked the most extraneous duped pages with a robots.txt file, however, since Google/Bing have already spidered many of the duped pages, I need to keep them accessible to the spiders, BUT removed from the index. The catch is, since the duped pages are aliases (and don't really physically exist in Sitecore that I can find), I am not sure how to go about using rel=canonical - or if I even can in this situation..?

    Read the article

  • Switching to HTTPS - redirect question

    - by seengee
    Following the recent Google announcements about improved ranking for sites running on https we have a number of clients asking about this. Is it safe to just 301 redirect all pages to their SSL equivalent, for example in a common PHP include file: if($_SERVER['HTTPS']!="on"){ $redirect= "https://".$_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'].$_SERVER['REQUEST_URI']; header("Location:$redirect",true,301); exit(); } Obviously I'm aware this is also possible within a .htaccess file but that cannot be modified in our case. Obviously all internal links would be switched to https:// links but obviously we need to sort out incoming links from Google and elsewhere. Is this a sound approach? Are there any other gotchas to be aware of?

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to offer an affiliate program for your iOS or Android app?

    - by wilfra
    Independent of the App Store or Google Play, is there a way to track where new downloads or paying customers came from? For example, if an app advertises my app in theirs - is there a way for me to find out which users actually downloaded it? And then pay that app owner a commission? On the web this is done via a tracking URL which places a cookie on a users machine. If they signup within a designated timeframe, they are 'tracked to' whomever had their affiliate code in the URL they clicked and that person would receive commissions. How could this be done with native mobile apps, while not violating Apple/Google rules?

    Read the article

  • Chrome débarque sur iPhone et sur iPad et sort de sa phase bêta sur Android

    Chrome débarque sur iPhone et iPad Et sort de sa phase bêta sur Android Alors que Mozilla travaille sur une pré-version de Firefox pour iPad, Google lui vient d'annoncer la première version de Chrome pour la tablette d'Apple, mais aussi pour l'iPhone. Pour Google, le but affiché est de pouvoir synchroniser les différentes expériences de navigation (PC et mobiles) des utilisateurs, quelques soient les marques des appareils qu'ils possèdent. Il est aussi ? et surtout ? de continuer à gagner des parts de marché en surfant sur la popularité toujours grandissante de iOS.

    Read the article

  • Do subdomains need to be defined through domain registrar?

    - by Johnny
    I have bought a new domain name from GoDaddy. Let's say it is abcd.com. On GoDaddy's DNS Managing page, I changed A(Host) part to @ = 74.125.232.215 which is www.google.co.uk's IP address. Now if I type www.abcd.com, it directly goes to www.google.co.uk. But if I type http://test.abcd.com, it cannot be loaded. Do I need to define every subdomain through GoDaddy? Is this how it works? P.S. Amazon EC2 directly generates a subdomain for users to reach their virtual PCs. It cannot be domain registrar dependant. P.S.2. Same question for using "www2" at the start of url.

    Read the article

  • Is this safe? <a href=http://javascript:...>

    - by KajMagnus
    I wonder if href and src attributes on <a> and <img> tags are always safe w.r.t. XSS attacks, if they start with http:// or https://. For example, is it possible to append javascript: ... to the href and src attribute in some manner, to execute code? Disregarding whether or not the destination page is e.g. a pishing site, or the <img src=...> triggers a terribly troublesome HTTP GET request. Background: I'm processing text with markdown, and then I sanitize the resulting HTML (using Google Caja's JsHtmlSanitizer). Some sample code in Google Caja assumes all hrefs and srcs that start with http:// or https:// are safe -- I wonder if it's safe to use that sample code. Kind regards, Kaj-Magnus

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426  | Next Page >