Search Results

Search found 6276 results on 252 pages for 'join'.

Page 43/252 | < Previous Page | 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50  | Next Page >

• SQL: joining multiples tables into one.

  - by Graveen

  I have 4 tables. r1, r2, r3 and r4. The table columns are the following: rId | rName I want to have, in fine, an unique table - let's call it R. Obviously, R will have the following structure: rTableName | rId | rName I'm looking for a solution, and the more natural for me is to: add a single column to all rX insert this column the table name i'm processing generate SQLs and concatenate them all Although I see exactly how to perform 1 and 3 with batching, editing, etc... (I have only to perform it once and for all), I don't see how to do the point 2: self-getting the tablename to insert into SQL. Have you an idea / or a different way to do that could solve my problem? Note: In fact, there are 250+ rX tables. That's why i can't do this manually. Note2: Precisely, this is with MySQL.

  Read the article

• MySQL Rating system (calculating average from two tables).

  - by MussuR

  I have two tables, videos and videos_ratings. The videos table has an int videoid field (and many others but those fields are not important I think) and many records. The videos_ratings table has 3 int fields: videoid, rating, rated_by which has many records (multiple records for each fields from the videos table) but not for all records from the videos table. Currently I have the following mysql query: SELECT `videos`.*, avg(`videos_ratings`.`vote`) FROM `videos`, `videos_ratings` WHERE `videos_ratings`.`videoid` = `videos`.`videoid` GROUP BY `videos_ratings`.`videoid` ORDER BY RAND() LIMIT 0, 12 It selects all the records from table videos that have a rating in table video_ratings and calculates the average correctly. But what I need is to select all records from the videos table, no matter if there is a rating for that record or not. And if there aren't any records in the videos_ratings table for that particular videos record, the average function should show 0. Hope someone could understand what I want... :) Thanks!

  Read the article

• T-SQL Self Join in combination with aggregate function

  - by Nick

  Hi, i have the following table. CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Tree]( [AutoID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, [Category] [varchar](10) NULL, [Condition] [varchar](10) NULL, [Description] [varchar](50) NULL, CONSTRAINT [PK_Tree] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ( [AutoID] ASC )WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY] ) ON [PRIMARY] GO the data looks like this: INSERT INTO [Test].[dbo].[Tree] ([Category] ,[Condition] ,[Description]) VALUES ('1','Alpha','Type 1') INSERT INTO [Test].[dbo].[Tree] ([Category] ,[Condition] ,[Description]) VALUES ('1','Alpha','Type 1') INSERT INTO [Test].[dbo].[Tree] ([Category] ,[Condition] ,[Description]) VALUES ('2','Alpha','Type 2') INSERT INTO [Test].[dbo].[Tree] ([Category] ,[Condition] ,[Description]) VALUES ('2','Alpha','Type 2') go I try now to do the following: SELECT Category,COUNT(*) as CategoryCount FROM Tree where Condition = 'Alpha' group by Category but i wish also to get the Description for each Element. I tried several subqueries, self joins etc. i always come to the problem that the subquery cannot return more than one record. The problem is caused by a poor database design which i cannot change and i run out of ideas to get this done in a single query ;-(

  Read the article

• Filtering with joined tables

  - by viraptor

  I'm trying to get some query performance improved, but the generated query does not look the way I expect it to. The results are retrieved using: query = session.query(SomeModel). options(joinedload_all('foo.bar')). options(joinedload_all('foo.baz')). options(joinedload('quux.other')) What I want to do is filter on the table joined via 'first', but this way doesn't work: query = query.filter(FooModel.address == '1.2.3.4') It results in a clause like this attached to the query: WHERE foos.address = '1.2.3.4' Which doesn't do the filtering in a proper way, since the generated joins attach tables foos_1 and foos_2. If I try that query manually but change the filtering clause to: WHERE foos_1.address = '1.2.3.4' AND foos_2.address = '1.2.3.4' It works fine. The question is of course - how can I achieve this with sqlalchemy itself?

  Read the article

• When to use CTEs to encapsulate sub-results, and when to let the RDBMS worry about massive joins.

  - by IanC

  This is a SQL theory question. I can provide an example, but I don't think it's needed to make my point. Anyone experienced with SQL will immediately know what I'm talking about. Usually we use joins to minimize the number of records due to matching the left and right rows. However, under certain conditions, joining tables cause a multiplication of results where the result is all permutations of the left and right records. I have a database which has 3 or 4 such joins. This turns what would be a few records into a multitude. My concern is that the tables will be large in production, so the number of these joined rows will be immense. Further, heavy math is performed on each row, and the idea of performing math on duplicate rows is enough to make anyone shudder. I have two questions. The first is, is this something I should care about, or will SQL Server intelligently realize these rows are all duplicates and optimize all processing accordingly? The second is, is there any advantage to grouping each part of the query so as to get only the distinct values going into the next part of the query, using something like: WITH t1 AS ( SELECT DISTINCT... [or GROUP BY] ), t2 AS ( SELECT DISTINCT... ), t3 AS ( SELECT DISTINCT... ) SELECT... I have often seen the use of DISTINCT applied to subqueries. There is obviously a reason for doing this. However, I'm talking about something a little different and perhaps more subtle and tricky.

  Read the article

• Ruby On Rails: Ask for Confirmation When Table Entry Associated With Another Is Destroyed

  - by Train Main

  Hi all, I would like some assistance with the following problem: I have a table of groups that is self-associated with itself, so each group is (optionally) linked to another in a hierarchical fashion. I want to write some code that will somehow check before the destruction of a group entry, if it has any children, and ask the user for confirmation, or whether they wish to delete the child groups as well. I've looked at callbacks, but I don't know how to get the confirmation request to the end user in the view, and then get the response back to the model's callback. Thanks

  Read the article

• Select in MySQL based on two tables

  - by Deyan

  Hello everyone, first of all I want to apologize for my bad english. So I have two tables. diseases ----------------------------- | ID | NAME | ----------------------------- | 1 | Disease 1 | | 2 | Disease 2 | | 3 | Disease 3 | diseases_symptoms ----------------------------- | DISEASE_ID | SYMPTOM_ID | ----------------------------- | 1 | 1 | | 1 | 2 | | 1 | 3 | | 1 | 4 | | 2 | 1 | | 2 | 2 | I want to select all diseses which have symptoms 1 or 2 and 3 or 4. I've tried: SELECT * FROM diseases_symtoms WHERE (symptoms = '1' OR symptoms = '2') AND (symptoms = '3' OR symptoms = '4') And: SELECT * FROM diseases_symtoms WHERE symptoms IN ('1','2') AND symptoms IN ('3','4') but it is not working.

  Read the article

• MySQL Search (Sort by Relevance)

  - by atif089

  Hi guys, Can any one help me how to sort rows by relevance for the following criterion ? tbluser First Name Last Name tbleduc School College University On the search form the user has following fields Name School College University Where School College and University are Optional.. And Name is split into 2 words (other words in middle are omitted), first word is taken as first anme and last word as last name.. Now I would like to implement search based on relevance. Thanks for the help :)

  Read the article

• how to compare the values inside a table in sql

  - by Ranjana

  how to compare the values of same table(say for eg: Order table) each and every time the record get inserted , if the record with same values get inserted already in same table i should not insert the new record with same values. how to do that exactly in sql server 2008

  Read the article

• SQL Query, return value from table with no join

  - by jdenomme19

  I'm hoping for an idea on the best way to approach what I'm trying to do. I have a table with a list of transactions. Each transactions has a PostDate in DateTime format. I have another table holding the fiscal period values. This table has the following columns; FiscalYear, FiscalMonth, StartDate, EndDate. I'm trying to write a query that will return all values from my transactions table, along with the FiscalYear and FiscalMonth of the PostDate. So I guess I'm just trying to return the FiscalYear and FiscalMonth values when the PostDate falls between the StartDate and EndDate. I've tried using a Subbuery, but I have little experience with them and kept returning an error message that the subquery was returning more than 1 value. Help would be appreciated SELECT Transactions.PostDate, Transactions.TranKey, Transactions.CustKey, (SELECT FiscalPeriod.FiscPer FROM FiscalPeriod WHERE (Transactions.PostDate > CONVERT(Datetime, FiscalPeriod.StartDate, 102)) AND (Transactions.PostDate < CONVERT(DATETIME, FiscalPeriod.EndDate, 102))) AS FisPer FROM Transactions

  Read the article

• Stop SQL returning the same result twice in a JOIN

  - by nbs189

  I have joined together several tables to get data i want but since I am new to SQL i can't figure out how to stop data being returned more than once. her's the SQL statement; SELECT T.url, T.ID, S.status, S.ID, E.action, E.ID, E.timestamp FROM tracks T, status S, events E WHERE S.ID AND T.ID = E.ID ORDER BY E.timestamp DESC The data that is returned is something like this; +----------------------------------------------------------------+ | URL | ID | Status | ID | action | ID | timestamp | +----------------------------------------------------------------+ | T.1 | 4 | hello | 4 | has uploaded a track | 4 | time | | T.2 | 3 | bye | 3 | has some news | 3 | time | | t.1 | 4 | more | 4 | has some news | 4 | time | +----------------------------------------------------------------+ That's a very basic example but does outline what happens. If you look at the third row the URL is repeated when there is a different status. This is what I want to happen; +-------------------------------------------------------+ | URL or Status | ID | action | timestamp | +-------------------------------------------------------+ | T.1 | 4 | has uploaded a track | time | | hello | 3 | has some news | time | | bye | 4 | has some news | time | +-------------------------------------------------------+ Please notice that the the url (in this case the mock one is T.1) is shown when the action is has uploaded a track. This is very important. The action in the events table is inserted on trigger of a status or track insert. If a new track is inserted the action is 'has uploaded a track' and you guess what it is for a status. The ID and timestamp is also inserted into the events table at this point. Note: There are more tables that go into the query, 3 more in fact, but I have left them out for simplicity.

  Read the article

• How do I combine two rows of same part, but add quantities?

  - by Tom

  I have table "PICKITEM" PARTID QTY A 1 A 3 B 11 C 8 D 5 D 3 I need a select statement that will return one line for like PARTIDs and add the qty field to together, yet also return the rest of the lines in the table as is PARTID QTY A 4 B 11 C 8 D 8 Probably a newb question, but I am new to SQL syntax and queries. Any help in getting me on the right path would be appreciated!

  Read the article

• MULTIPLE CRITERIA TABLE JOIN

  - by user1447203

  I have a table listing clothing items (shirt, trousers, etc) named . Each item is identified with a unique CLOTHING.CLOTHING_ID. So a blue shirt is 01, a flowery shirt is 12 and jeans are 07 say. I have a second table identifying outfits with a column for shirts, for trousers, shoes etc. For example Outfit 1: shirt 01, trousers 07 (i.e. blue shirt with jeans) Outfit 2: shirt 12, trousers 07 (so flowery shirt with jeans). This table is named and each outfit is unique with OUTFIT_LIST.OUTFIT_ID. I want to produce a select statement that will list each outfit's contents, i.e. find the clothing specified in Outfit 1. Any help would be very much appreciated, and apologies in advance if I am missing a very simple solution. I have been playing with JOINS of all descriptions and CONCATS and so on with now luck - I am very new to this. Thanks.

  Read the article

• pthread_exit return value

  - by Manty

  This is surprising for me. void * thread_func(void *arg) { pthread_exit(&ret); } int main(void) { pthread_t thr; int *exit_status; pthread_create(&thr, NULL, thread_func, NULL); sleep(2); pthread_join(thr, (void **)&exit_status); printf("value of exit status - %d\n", *exit_status); ret = 20; pthread_join(thr, (void **)&exit_status); printf("value of exit status - %d\n", *exit_status); return 0; } The output is value of exit status - 50 value of exit status - 20 I was expecting both the times the exit_status would be the actual exit value(50 in my case) of the thread. Instead it is just returning the value of the global variable which I used for pthread_exit. Is it not a bug?

  Read the article

• Rails active record association problem

  - by Harm de Wit

  Hello, I'm new at active record association in rails so i don't know how to solve the following problem: I have a tables called 'meetings' and 'users'. I have correctly associated these two together by making a table 'participants' and set the following association statements: class Meeting < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :participants, :dependent => :destroy has_many :users, :through => :participants and class Participant < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :meeting belongs_to :user and the last model class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :participants, :dependent => :destroy At this point all is going well and i can access the user values of attending participants of a specific meeting by calling @meeting.users in the normal meetingshow.html.erb view. Now i want to make connections between these participants. Therefore i made a model called 'connections' and created the columns of 'meeting_id', 'user_id' and 'connected_user_id'. So these connections are kinda like friendships within a certain meeting. My question is: How can i set the model associations so i can easily control these connections? I would like to see a solution where i could use @meeting.users.each do |user| user.connections.each do |c| <do something> end end I tried this by changing the model of meetings to this: class Meeting < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :participants, :dependent => :destroy has_many :users, :through => :participants has_many :connections, :dependent => :destroy has_many :participating_user_connections, :through => :connections, :source => :user Please, does anyone have a solution/tip how to solve this the rails way?

  Read the article

• Need help Linq query join + count + group by

  - by user233540

  I have two table First table BID Town 1 ABC 2 ABC2 3 ABC Second Table PID BID AmountFirst AmountSecond AmountThird Minority 1__ 1___ 1000_____ 1000________ 1000_____ SC 2__ 2___ 2000_____ 1000_______ 2000_____ ST 3__ 3___ 1000____ 1000_______ 1000_______ SC BID is foreign key in Second table. I want sum AmountFirst + AmountSecond +AmountThird for individualTown e.g for ABC town answer should be : 6000 (summation of PID 1 and PID 2) I want Linq query for this..Please help

  Read the article

• The least amount of code possible for this MySQL query?

  - by ddan

  I have a MySQL query that: gets data from three tables linked by unique id's. counts the number of games played in each category, from each user and counts the number of games each user has played that fall under the "fps" category It seems to me that this code could be a lot smaller. How would I go about making this query smaller. http://sqlfiddle.com/#!2/6d211/1 Any help is appreciated even if you just give me links to check out.

  Read the article

• MySQL: List rows who have one but not another many-to-many relationship

  - by Svish

  Not quite sure how to ask or define this, but can't figure it out. I have three tables like this: persons person_id, first_name, last_name hobbies hobby_id, name persons_hobbies person_id, hobby_id I need to make two lists. Persons that have both hobby A and B, and persons that have hobby A but not B. How can I write these two queries? Can't figure out how to do this with joining and all...

  Read the article

• MySQL query with JOINS and GROUP BY

  - by user1854049

  I'm building a MySQL query but I can't seem to get it right. I have four tables: - customers - orders - sales_rates - purchase_rates There is a 1:n relation 'customernr' between customers and orders. There is a 1:n relation 'ordernr' between orders and sales_rates. There is a 1:n relation 'ordernr' between orders and purchase_rates. What I would like to do is produce an output of all customers with their total purchase and sales amounts. So far I have the following query. SELECT c.customernr, c.customer_name, SUM(sr.sales_price) AS sales_price, SUM(pr.purchase_price) AS purchase_price FROM orders o, customers c, sales_rates sr, purchase_rates pr WHERE o.customernr = c.customernr AND o.ordernr = sr.ordernr AND o.ordernr = pr.ordernr GROUP BY k.bedrijfsnaam The result of the sales_price and purchase_price is far too high. I seem to be getting double counts. What am I doing wrong? Is it possible to perform this in a single query? Thank for your response!

  Read the article

• sql query help join (i think)

  - by milan

  I am having trouble figuring our how I can get results only when products.published, product_types.published, and product_cats.published = 1 but my query isn't working. Please help: SELECT `products`.`title`, `products`.`menu_id`, `products`.`short_description`, `products`.`datasheet_icon`, `products`.`datasheet`, `products`.`ordering`, `products`.`product_type_id`, CASE WHEN CHAR_LENGTH(`products`.`alias`) THEN CONCAT_WS(':', `products`.`id`, `products`.`alias`) ELSE `products`.`id` END AS slug FROM `products`, `product_cats`, `product_types` WHERE `products`.published=1 AND `product_cats`.published=1 AND `product_types`.published=1 AND `products`.`product_cat_id`='42' AND `product_types`.`id` IN (1,40,48,49,50) GROUP BY `products`.`id` ORDER BY `product_types`.`ordering`, `products`.`ordering`

  Read the article

• Please help me out in fetching the desired result from below given DB table structure of MySQL..

  - by OM The Eternity

  Hi All below are the table structures according to which I have to develop the desired output(given at the end) tbl_docatr docatr_id doc_id docatrtype_id docatr_float docatr_int docatr_date docatr_varchar docatr_blob 1 12 1 NULL NULL NULL testing [BLOB - NULL] 2 12 2 NULL NULL NULL Tesitng [BLOB - NULL] tbl_docatrtype docatrtype_id docatrtypegroup_id docatrtypetype_id docatrtype_name 1 1 4 Name 2 1 4 Company Name tbl_docatrtypetype docatrtypetype_id docatrtypetype_name 1 Float 2 Int 3 Date 4 String line Above are three tables from which I have to display the desired output as Name : testing Company Name : Tesitng such that at first step I have doc_id then I get docatrtype_id and then docatrtypetype_id acording to these values i have to fetch the result. Also the query must see the doactrtypetype_id from table tbl_docatrtypetype and fetch the result from tbl_docatr from respective column docatr_float, docatr_int, docatr_date, docatr_varchar, docatr_blob Please help!!!

  Read the article

• Join two results sets to make one result set in T-SQL

  - by Michael Kniskern

  What would be the best approach to combine the two results sets in one result set in T-SQL? SQL statment #1: SELECT COUNT(t.col1) as 'Number of Responses', t.col2 as 'Department' FROM table t WHERE col3 IS NOT NULL GROUP BY t.col1 ORDER BY t.col1 SQL Statment #1: SELECT COUNT(t.col1) as 'Total number of participants', t.col2 as 'Department' FROM table t GROUP BY t.col1 ORDER by t.col1 Desired result set Number of Responses | Total Number of participants | Department

  Read the article

• Activerecord join search

  - by VP

  Hi, i have two models: class Category has many :jobs end class Job belongs_to :category end So for sure i'm able to do c = Category.first c.jobs My question is: how can i find just categories that has at least one job?

  Read the article

• How do I get a right outer join in L2E?

  - by Dan

  I have two tables that I set up through the VS Entity Data Model Diagram tool. I'm trying to do a right outer join and it doesn't return results from the 2nd table. I have set up a 0..1 to MANY relationship from the diagram tool. When I run a Linq-To-Entities query, it still defaults to an INNER JOIN. From my understanding of entities, if I set up the relationship using VS, when I join the tables, it should automagically figure out the join syntax based on the relationship I supply. It doesn't seem to be doing that. I am using EF v1 (not Linq-to-Sql). Query I'm running: from s in SomeTable join t in SomeOtherTable on s.ID equals t.ID select new { s.MyFieldName, t.MyOtherFieldName }

  Read the article

• How to convert full outer join query to O-R query?

  - by Kugel

  I'm converting relational database into object-relational in Oracle. I have a query that uses full outer join in the old one. Is it possible to write the same query for O-R database without explicitly using full outer join? For normal inner join it simple, I just use dot notation together with ref/deref. I'm interested in this in general so let's say the relational query is: select a.attr, b.attr from a full outer join b on (a.fk = b.pk); I want to know if it's a good idea to do it this way: select a.attr, b.attr from a_obj a full outer join b_obj b on (a.b_ref = ref(b));

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50  | Next Page >