Search Results

Search found 5291 results on 212 pages for 'disable'.

Page 45/212 | < Previous Page | 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52  | Next Page >

  • Disable page redirects using Greasemonkey

    - by Tomer Cohen
    A website I wish to tweak is using window.location in order to redirect specific users to a blocking page. That website is doing it in plain <script> tag, so it is impossible to bypass it by overriding the onload event using document.body.setAttribute('onload','');. Is there another way to inject my code to the page without using Firefox extensions such as NoScript? <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <title></title> <script type="text/javascript"> if (1) window.location="http://example.net" </script> </head> <body></body> </html>

    Read the article

  • Globally disable Ext JS Animations

    - by ifwdev
    I'm testing an intranet web app in the iPad but the animations to open "windows" and show message boxes are horribly slow. I've tried setting the global Ext.enableFx to false, and confirmed that flag is still false after page load in Firebug. The animations are still occurring though so I must be doing something wrong. Thanks...

    Read the article

  • How to disable customization for the TabBar?

    - by mana
    Hey, within my App it should be forbidden to edit (customize) the TabBar. This means there should be no edit button and no other possibility to change the order of the items. (this is not my decision, the boss wants it that way :) ) I can't find a property to do this - so is this possible after all? cheers

    Read the article

  • Enable/disable zoom on iPhone safari with Javascript?

    - by msqr
    I have 1 page which has 2 DIV elements which is shown/hidden based on user click on action buttons with javascript, I would like to toggle scaling on action button click. I tried with below javascript and it is changing viewport meta but getting no effect. Any suggestions? Blockquote var ViewPortAllowZoom = 'width=device-width;'; var ViewPortNoZoom = 'width=device-width; initial-scale=1.0; maximum-scale=1.0; minimum-scale=1.0; user-scalable=no;'; function AllowZoom(flag) { if (flag == true) { $('meta[name*=viewport]').attr('content', ViewPortAllowZoom); } else { $('meta[name*=viewport]').attr('content', ViewPortNoZoom); } }

    Read the article

  • disable a form in asp.net..

    - by rohit
    hi iam working on asp.net using c# project...iam facing a problem...the problem is,i had a master page in which iam using collapse pannel(ajax control)... in collapse pannel i had folders like:- xyz abc def ghi.... and in xyz folder i had some forms.... nw the problem is that i had a search menu in my main page(comes after login)...after searching a grid view is open and in that there is a column name (suppose) XYZ...so when i click on items in that column then only i want xyz folder to be enable or viewed so that i acess forms in that folder....hw cud i do that..i search alot but didn't get the solution..plz help me go through this...

    Read the article

  • Disable email when modifying several bugs at once in bugzilla

    - by Jay Paroline
    Where I work, we use Bugzilla extensively for bug and feature tracking. We take advantage of the built in milestones to help us manage our timelines better, but sometimes priorities shift and milestones need to be rearranged. During this time we use the "change several bugs at once" feature to move them around, but the result is a ton of bugspam for everyone involved (except the person actually doing the changing, of course). Is there any way to easily turn off emails if many bugs are being changed at once?

    Read the article

  • Forms authentication: disable redirect to the login page

    - by codeka
    I have an application that uses ASP.NET Forms Authentication. For the most part, it's working great, but I'm trying to add support for a simple API via an .ashx file. I want the ashx file to have optional authentication (i.e. if you don't supply an Authentication header, then it just works anonymously). But, depending on what you do, I want to require authentication under certain conditions. I thought it would be a simple matter of responding with status code 401 if the required authentication was not supplied, but it seems like the Forms Authentcation module is intercepting that and responding with a redirect to the login page instead. What I mean is, if my ProcessRequest method looks like this: public void ProcessRequest(HttpContext context) { Response.StatusCode = 401; Response.StatusDescription = "Authentication required"; } Then instead of getting a 401 error code on the client, like I expect, I'm actually getting a 302 redirect to the login page. For nornal HTTP traffic, I can see how that would be useful, but for my API page, I want the 401 to go through unmodified so that the client-side caller can respond to it programmatically instead. Is there any way to do that?

    Read the article

  • ssrs column groups disable multiple columns

    - by DKS
    I'm using ASP.NET 4.0 Visual Studio 2010 RC version Sql Server Report Services (SSRS) ReportViewer and are aware that columns only display on PDF export - not the preview. I want to use a matrix embedded in a table on a page that has multiple columns. I've done some testing and frustratingly found that if you have a tablix with at least one grouped column (even if there is only one displayed matrix-like column group) the columns seem to be disabled. Once I remove the tablix with a grouped column from the tablix from the report the report does multiple-columns. Does anyone know a way around this?

    Read the article

  • Disable Spring URL resource loading in context file

    - by drewzilla
    I have the need to specify a URL in a Spring context file but don't want Spring to turn it into a resource, i.e. I want the URL to be passed as a String to the bean that I'm creating in the context file rather than it being converted into a Resource object. How can I avoid Spring creating a Resource? Thanks, Andrew

    Read the article

  • Disable a button on click

    - by Hitz
    I have a button control. Once the user clicks on it, the click event should fire and then the button should get disabled. How can I do this? I have the option to use JQuery or JavasSript or both. Here is my button declaration: <asp:Button ID="Button1" runat="server" Text="Click Me" onclick="Button1_Click" /> On the button click code behind, I have added a Response.Write(). That should get executed and then the button should be disabled

    Read the article

  • How to disable form submit if the username is not available

    - by Rajasekar
    I have checked the user name availability. The problem is, even if the username is not available, the form is posting. Edited Code: <SCRIPT type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function(){ $("#emailch").change(function() { var usr = $("#emailch").val(); if(usr.length >= 3) { $("#status").html('<img src="images/loader.gif" align="absmiddle">&nbsp;Checking availability...'); $.ajax({ type: "POST", url: "includes/check.php", data: "username="+ usr, success: function(msg){ $("#status").ajaxComplete(function(event, request, settings){ if(msg == 'OK') { $("#username").removeClass('object_error'); // if necessary $("#username").addClass("object_ok"); $(this).html('&nbsp;<img src="images/tick.gif" align="absmiddle">'); } else { $("#username").removeClass('object_ok'); // if necessary $("#username").addClass("object_error"); $(this).html(msg); } }); } }); } else { $("#status").html('<font color="red">The username should have at least <strong>3</strong> characters.</font>'); $("#username").removeClass('object_ok'); // if necessary $("#username").addClass("object_error"); } }); }); </SCRIPT> What I want is that, the form should not be posted if the user name is not available. I have tried by using return false; in IF CONDITION but it fails. Please suggest any alternate method. Any help will be appreciated.

    Read the article

  • jQuery Validation plugin: disable validation for specified submit buttons when there is submitHandle

    - by ccppjava
    Ok, I am using umbraco forum module, and on the comment form it uses jquery validate plugin. The problem is that I have added a search button on the same page using a UserControl, the search submit button triggers the comment form submission validation. I have done some research, and added the 'cancel' css class to the button. This bypass the first validation issue, however, it still fall into the 'submitHandler'. Have read the source code and find a way to detect whether the search button triggers the submission. however, there is not a nice way to bypass the handler. I am currently using a ugly way to do it: create javascript errors! I would like to know a nicer way to do the job. Many thanks! Btw, I am currently using: submitHandler: function (form) { $(form).find(':hidden').each(function () { var name = $(this).attr('name'); if (name && name.indexOf('btnSearch') === name.length - 'btnSearch'.length) { // this is a dirty hack to avoid the validate plugin to work for the button eval("var error = 1 2 ''"); } }); // original code from umbraco ignored here.... } ...............

    Read the article

  • How to check flash and javascript installed/enable/disable on browser using JQuery

    - by MKS
    Hi Guys, I am using JQuery. I have got one link as given below: <li><a href="http://staging/english/Skywards/skywards.aspx" id="skywardsTopLoginLink">Login</a></li> Now I want to check on page load whether Flash/javascript is installed or disabled and according to output the Login link will work, I mean if flash/javascript is disabled or not installed then it will go to the above Href else it will open jQuery model dialog box for login functionality

    Read the article

  • Disable colour change when source list loses focus

    - by ICR
    When an item is selected in the source list it is highlighted in blue. When another element on the window is selected, however, the highlight becomes a lighter blue as the source list is no longer focused. I would like to change the behaviour so the item is always the darker blue, the same behaviour as seen in Finder.

    Read the article

  • Disable MSBuild output of "Processing /ORDER options..."

    - by Jippers
    The output file from our project build has gone from 6MB to over 75MB in text. Diff'ing the last good build and the first time it blew up, there's a section in the output file like this in the latest: Processing /ORDER options External code objects not listed in the /ORDER file: ?onCallDisconnected@CallStateConnected@CallImpl@space@@UAEXV?$shared_ptr@VCallImpl@space@@@boost@@V?$shared_ptr@VGenericCall@space@@@5@K@Z ; framework.lib(CallStates.obj) ??_DBoolSetting@space@@QAEXXZ ; framework.lib(SettingValueImpl.obj) ...... continues for ~50MB ??$?0U?$pair@$$CBV?$basic_string@_WU?$char_traits@_W@std@@V?$allocator@_W@2@@std@@J@std@@@?$allocator@U_Node@?$_Tree_nod@V?$_Tmap_traits@V?$basic_string@_WU?$char_traits@_W@std@@V?$allocator@_W@2@@std@@JU?$less@V?$basic_string@_WU?$char_traits@_W@std@@V?$allocator@_W@2@@std@@@2@V?$allocator@U?$pair@$$CBV?$basic_string@_WU?$char_traits@_W@std@@V?$allocator@_W@2@@std@@J@std@@@2@$0A@@std@@@std@@@std@@QAE@ABV?$allocator@U?$pair@$$CBV?$basic_string@_WU?$char_traits@_W@std@@V?$allocator@_W@2@@std@@J@std@@@1@@Z ; CallStatistics.obj Finished processing /ORDER options I'm not sure how this got in there, but anyone know how to turn it off?

    Read the article

  • Disable Drag&Drop of files in Richtextbox in .NET

    - by Jiri
    Hello, I use a .NET richtextbox and I want to have the EnableAutoDragDrop property set to True. This allows user to drag&drop text, rtf and images around etc. However, I need to process files dropped into the richtextbox myself - I do not want them to be embedded as OLE objects when they are dropped. How can I overcome this? Is there any way to delete embedded files from richtextbox? (I've found API DragAcceptFiles which doesn't work for some reason.) Thanks!

    Read the article

  • how to make a div(black border,and on the google-maps) panel drop-disable,thanks

    - by zjm1126
    the black div is used to panel,so it can not be droppable. <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD XHTML Mobile 1.0//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/xhtml-mobile10.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" > <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,minimum-scale=0.3,maximum-scale=5.0,user-scalable=yes"> </head> <body onload="initialize()" onunload="GUnload()"> <style type="text/css"> *{ margin:0; padding:0; } .container{ padding:10px; width:50px; height:50px; border:5px solid black; } </style> <!--<div style="width:100px;height:100px;background:blue;"> </div>--> <div id="map_canvas" style="width: 500px; height: 300px;"></div> <!-- <div class=b style="width: 20px; height: 20px;background:red;position:absolute;left:700px;top:200px;"></div> <div class=b style="width: 20px; height: 20px;background:red;position:absolute;left:700px;top:200px;"></div> <div class=b style="width: 20px; height: 20px;background:red;position:absolute;left:700px;top:200px;"></div> <div class=b style="width: 20px; height: 20px;background:red;position:absolute;left:700px;top:200px;"></div> <div class=b style="width: 20px; height: 20px;background:red;position:absolute;left:700px;top:200px;"></div> --> <script src="jquery-1.4.2.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="jquery-ui-1.8rc3.custom.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="http://maps.google.com/maps?file=api&amp;v=2&amp;key=ABQIAAAA-7cuV3vqp7w6zUNiN_F4uBRi_j0U6kJrkFvY4-OX2XYmEAa76BSNz0ifabgugotzJgrxyodPDmheRA&sensor=false"type="text/javascript"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> var aFn; //********** function initialize() { if (GBrowserIsCompatible()) { //************ function a() { } a.prototype = new GControl(); a.prototype.initialize = function(map) { var container = document.createElement("div"); var a=''; for(i=0;i<5;i++){ a+='<div class=b style="width: 20px; height: 20px;background:red;position:absolute;"></div>' } $(container).addClass('container'); $(container).droppable( 'destroy' ).css('z-index','2700') $(map.getContainer()).append($(container).append(a)); return container; } a.prototype.getDefaultPosition = function() { return new GControlPosition(G_ANCHOR_TOP_LEFT, new GSize(7, 7)); } //************ var map = new GMap2(document.getElementById("map_canvas")); map.addControl(new a()); var center=new GLatLng(39.9493, 116.3975); map.setCenter(center, 13); aFn=function(x,y){ var point =new GPoint(x,y) point = map.fromContainerPixelToLatLng(point); //console.log(point.x+" "+point.y) map.addOverlay(new GMarker(point)); } $(".b").draggable({}); $("#map_canvas").droppable({ drop: function(event,ui) { //console.log(ui.offset.left+' '+ui.offset.top) aFn(ui.offset.left+10,ui.offset.top+10); ui.draggable.remove(); } }); } } //************* </script> </body> </html>

    Read the article

  • How to disable items in a List View???

    - by Techeretic
    I have a list view which is populated via records from the database. Now i have to make some records visible but unavailable for selection, how can i achieve that? here's my code public class SomeClass extends ListActivity { private static List<String> products; private DataHelper dh; public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { dh = new DataHelper(this); products = dh.GetMyProducts(); /* Returns a List<String>*/ super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setListAdapter(new ArrayAdapter<String>(this, R.layout.myproducts, products)); ListView lv = getListView(); lv.setTextFilterEnabled(true); lv.setOnItemClickListener( new OnItemClickListener() { @Override public void onItemClick(AdapterView<?> arg0, View arg1, int arg2, long arg3) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub Toast.makeText(getApplicationContext(), ((TextView) arg1).getText(), Toast.LENGTH_SHORT).show(); } } ); } } The layout file myproducts.xml is as follows <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <TextView xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android" android:layout_width="fill_parent" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:padding="10dp" android:textSize="16sp"> </TextView>

    Read the article

  • DHTMLX calendar enable / disable in whole website

    - by user229538
    Hello everyone, I am working on website (built using PHP, Mysql, Jquery) which require that admin set a variable in configuration and according to that configuration variable Jquery autocomplete is enabled or disabled to all website. Is there any way to achieve that functionality. Please help me, its very urgent........

    Read the article

  • Dynamically disable custom (VBA) Excel context menu buttons?

    - by Lopsided
    The Scenario Hi guys, I am about to add a few custom controls to the cell context menu in my Excel workbook using the instructions found on this MSDN page. The only problem I am having is that I need the items to only be enabled for a specific column/range of cells. I've looked around, and I've been unable to find any steps for this--there are some for VSTO development (written in C#), but that is not what I need. I plan to write this using the VBA IDE built into Office, and perhaps a bit of XML using the Custom UI Editor. The Question So basically, I'm looking for a way to run a function at the time the context menu is called (i.e., upon right-click) that validates the selection to make sure it is in the appropriate column. If it isn't, I would like my custom buttons to be greyed out. P.S. Please don't think I am asking you to write my code. Creating these buttons should be very simple, as I have created many before (albeit they were all Ribbon items), and I hope it is okay to ask for some quick assistance on this very specific issue. Thank you in advance!

    Read the article

  • How can I disable the F4 key from showing the items in a ComboBox

    - by Alex
    You might not know this, but pressing the F4 key on a ComboBox makes it's drop-down item list appear. I believe this is the default behavior on Windows. Does anyone know how to override this behavior in WPF (C#)? I know that overriding default behavior is generally seen as bad practice, however in this case I have a rugged-device that runs XP Embedded. It has a handful of prominent Function keys (F1-F6) that need to trigger different events. This works fine, however when focused over a ComboBox the events aren't triggered as the ComboBox drops down. I have tried catching the KeyDown event both on the form and on the ComboBox and listening for the F4 key, however it doesn't get this far as the key press must be handled at a lower level. Any ideas? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How can I disable a model field in a django form

    - by jammon
    I have a model like this: class MyModel(models.Model): REGULAR = 1 PREMIUM = 2 STATUS_CHOICES = ((REGULAR, "regular"), (PREMIUM, "premium")) name = models.CharField(max_length=30) status = models.IntegerField(choices = STATUS_CHOICES, default = REGULAR) class MyForm(forms.ModelForm): class Meta: model = models.MyModel In a view I initialize one field and try to make it non-editable: myform = MyForm(initial = {'status': requested_status}) myform.fields['status'].editable = False But the user can still change that field. What's the real way to accomplish what I'm after?

    Read the article

  • Disable source of the asp.net page

    - by Zerotoinfinite
    Hi All, I have developed my application in asp.net 3.5 and C#. I have deployed my application on internet and now when I am going to the source of the page, I am able to see all my asp.net controls defined [ie. my aspx page], is their any way I can hide it so that user can't see my source of the page [except right click of mouse] or at least display in pure HTML form so that people can not identify that I am using asp.net. Thanks in advance

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52  | Next Page >