Search Results

Search found 8547 results on 342 pages for 'hash join'.

Page 45/342 | < Previous Page | 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52  | Next Page >

  • Hibernate - join un related objects

    - by CuriousMind
    I have a requirement, wherein I have to join two unrelated objects using Hibernate HQL. Here is the sample POJO class class Product{ int product_id; String name; String description; } and Class Item{ int item_id; String name; String description; int quantity; int product_id; //Note that there is no composed product object. } Now I want to perform a query like select * from Product p left outer join Item i on p.product_id = i.item_id I want a multidimensional array as an output of this query so that I can have separate instances of Product and Item, instead of one composed in another. Is there any way to do this in Hibernate?

    Read the article

  • SUM of column with Left Outer Join

    - by Matt
    I am trying to get the Count of all records that have at least on person who is authorized on the record. Basically, a Record can have more than one person associated with it. I want to return the count of Total Records, a count of total Authorized Records where at least 1 person is authorized, and a count of total NotAuthorized records where no person associated with record is authorized. It doesn't matter if one person is authorized per Record or if 3 people are authorized for that record, that should add 1 to the Authorized counter. The current query is incrementing Auth and Non auth for each person added per record rather, than one per record. If no people are assigned to the record that should also count towards Not Auth. SELECT Count(DISTINCT Record.RecordID) AS TotalRecords, SUM(CASE WHEN People.PersonLevel = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS Authorized, SUM(CASE WHEN People.PersonLevel <> 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS NotAuthorized FROM Record LEFT OUTER JOIN RecordPeople ON Record.RecordID = RecordPeople.RecordID LEFT OUTER JOIN People ON RecordPeople.PersonID = People.PersonID

    Read the article

  • Translate SQL to LINQ query - group/join/filter

    - by Paddy
    I have the following query: SELECT S.[FlowOrder], S.[DESCRIPTION], COUNT(I.ID) FROM WorkFlowStatus AS S INNER JOIN Item AS I ON S.ID = I.StatusID WHERE I.Installation = '1' GROUP BY S.[Description], S.[FlowOrder] ORDER BY S.[FlowOrder] Which gives me the count of an item, grouped by a foreign key to workflow, outputting the descriptive name from my FK table. I've go this far with the LINQ query (using LINQ-to-SQL) in the background: var items = from s in _entities.WorkflowStatus join i in _entities.Items on s.ID equals i.StatusId into Statuses orderby s.FlowOrder select new {s.Description, ItemCount = Statuses.Count() }; How do I get the where clause in the SQL into this LINQ query?

    Read the article

  • Using LEFT JOIN to only selection one joined row

    - by Alex
    I'm trying to LEFT JOIN two tables, to get a list of all rows from TABLE_1 and ONE related row from TABLE_2. I have tried LEFT JOIN and GROUP BY c_id, however I wan't the related row from TABLE_2 to be sorted by isHeadOffice DESC. Here are some sample tables TABLE 1 c_id Name ---------------- 1 USA 2 Canada 3 England 4 France 5 Spain TABLE2 o_id c_id Office isHeadOffice ------------------------------------------------ 1 1 New York 1 2 1 Washington 0 3 1 Boston 0 4 2 Toronto 0 5 3 London 0 6 3 Manchester 1 7 4 Paris 1 8 4 Lyon 0 So what I am trying to get from this would be something like: RESULTS c_id Name Office ---------------------------- 1 USA New York 2 Canada Toronto 3 England Manchester 4 France Paris 5 Spain NULL I'm using PHP & MySQL. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Problem using mysql joins

    - by mariomario
    I'm fairly new to mysql and I have no idea if I'm heading in the right direction but I'm having trouble with a mysql query. I basically have a table of users id name ---- -------- 1 user1 2 user2 3 user3 4 user4 as well as a table of user attributes id userid attribute ---- ----- ------ 1 1 5 2 1 6 3 2 5 4 3 4 I want to be able to select users that have both the attribute 5 and the attribute 6, so in this case I want to return id name ---- -------- 1 user1 I tried using a join like this. SELECT u.id, u.name FROM users u LEFT JOIN attributes a ON (a.userid = u.id) WHERE a.attribute = 5 AND a.attribute = 6 But obviously that won't work, what is the best way of doing this?

    Read the article

  • Linq to Entities (EF): How to get the value of a FK without doing the join

    - by Chu
    I'm using the Linq to Entities. I've got my main table, Employee setup with a field named vendorID. Vendor ID is a foreign key into the Vendors table. As it is right now, the Employee object does not directly expose the vendorID. Instead, I can only access it this way: var employee = (from e in context.Employees.Include("tbl_vendors") where e.employeeID = 1 select e).FirstOrDefault(); //this gets the vendor ID int vendorID = employee.tbl_vendors.vendorID; That is just fine and dandy, but it is extra work on the database because it is forcing a join where none is needed. Is there a way to get that key value without being forced to do a join to the tbl_vendors table?

    Read the article

  • Compare two object lists with LINQ on specific property

    - by Niklas
    I have these two lists (where the Value in a SelectListItem is a bookingid): List<SelectListItem> selectedbookings; List<Booking> availableBookings; I need to find the ids from selectedBookings that are not in availableBookings. The LINQ join below will only get me the bookingids that are in availableBookings, and I'm not sure how to do it the other way around. != won't work since I'm comparing strings. results = ( from s in selectedbookings join a in availableBookings on s.bookingID.ToString() equals a.Value select s);

    Read the article

  • Sql join, 2 tables, same fields

    - by Lobuno
    I have 2 tables. To simplify: Table 1, users: userId int, userName nvarchar(50) Table 2 , messages: msgId int, msgFrom int, msgTo int... msg1 and msg2, both contain userId. Now I want to get all messages, but instead of the msgFrom I want the user name. I know what to do here: select tabMessages.*, tabUsers.userName as Sender from tabMessages inner join tabUsers on msgFrom=userId where msgId = @someParameter; Everything works fine and dandy. The same to get the user name instead of msgTo. Now the problem is, how do I do to get BOTH fields in the same call? I want to get the table as msgId, msgFrom, msgTo, Sender, Recipient. I have tried as: select tabMessages.*, tabUsers.userName as Sender, tabUsers.userName as Recipient from tabMessages inner join tabUsers on msgFrom=userId and msgTo=userId where msgId = @someParameter; but that doesn't work. I'm using Ms sql2000 by the way.

    Read the article

  • mysql query to concat information from 3 tables - getting incorrect result count

    - by iPfaffy
    I have 3 tables in my database. ab_contacts id first_name last_name addressbook_id ab_addressbooks name id co_comments id link_id comment I'd like to create a query that will let me select all the contacts and comments related to them in a given addressbook. To select all the people in a given addressbook, I can use: select count(*) from ab_contacts where addressbook_id = '50'; This returns 8152 people. However, when I run my query: select ab_contacts.first_name, ab_contacts.last_name, ab_contacts.email, ab_addressbooks.name, co_comments.comments from ab_contacts JOIN ab_addressbooks ON (ab_contacts.addressbook_id = ab_addressbooks.id) JOIN co_comments ON (ab_contacts.id = co_comments.link_id) WHERE ab_contacts.addressbook_id = '50';` the format works, but I only get 1045 results. I'm sure there is something I am missing, but I cannot figure it out. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • MySQL customized join query using multiple tables

    - by itgeek
    I am searching one student from each class from one group. There are different class groups and every group has different classes and every class has multiple students. See below: Group1 --> Class1, Class2 etc Class1 --> GreenStudent1, GreenStudent2 etc Class2 --> RedStudent1, RedStudent2 etc ------------------------------------------------------ SELECT table1.id, table1.myname, table1.marks table2.studentid, table2.studentname FROM table1 INNER JOIN table3 ON table1.oldid = table3.id INNER JOIN table2 ON table2.studentid = table3.newid WHERE table1.classgroup = 'SCI79' GROUP BY table1.oldid ORDER BY table1.marks DESC There are different joins applied in the query. Above mentioned query giving me correct results but I need little modification in it. Current query returning me one student from each class. What I need? I need one student from each class but only that student who has MAXIMUM table1.marks So I should have one student from each class who has maximum number in their relevant classes. Can anyone suggest some solution or rewrite this query? Thanks :)

    Read the article

  • mysql syntax how to add a third table to $query

    - by IberoMedia
    I have code: $query = "SELECT a.*, c.name as categoryname, c.id as categoryid". " FROM #__table_one as a". " LEFT JOIN #__table_two c ON c.id = a.catid"; $query .= " WHERE a.published = 1" ." AND a.access <= {$aid}" ." AND a.trash = 0" ." AND c.published = 1" ." AND c.access <= {$aid}" ." AND c.trash = 0" ; I would like to add a third table ('__some_table') for the parts of the query where a.publish, a.access and a.trash. In other words, I want these fields to be retrieved from another table, not "#__table_one", but I do not know how to incorporate the #__some_table into the current query I imagine the JOIN command can help me, but I do not know how to code mysql Thank you,

    Read the article

  • Help with MySQL Query?

    - by Devyn
    I have two tables rooms and users. I want to get only rooms.room_id, users.user_name with user_id = 1. I can get the result of all users with following sql... select rooms.room_id, rooms.user_id, users.user_name from rooms LEFT JOIN users ON rooms.user_id = users.user_id When I do like this to filter the result with user_id = 1 ... I got error. select rooms.room_id, rooms.user_id, users.user_name from rooms where rooms.user_id = 1 LEFT JOIN users ON rooms.user_id = users.user_id What should I do?

    Read the article

  • Pattern for unidirectional has_many join?

    - by Kris
    It occurred to me that if I have a has_many join, where the foreign model does not have a belongs_to, and so the join is one way, then I don't actually need a foreign key. We could have a column, category_ids, which stores a marshaled Array of IDs which we can pass to find. So here is an untested example: class page < AR def categories Category.find(self.category_ids) end def categories<<(category) # get id and append to category_ids save! end def category_ids @cat_ids ||= Marshal.load(read_attribute(:category_ids)) rescue [] end def category_ids=(ids) @cat_ids = ids write_attribute(:category_ids, ids) end end page.category_ids = [1,4,12,3] page.categories = Array of Category Is there accepted pattern for this already? Is it common or just not worth the effort?

    Read the article

  • MYSQL - Adding result set A to result set B? Please see my example

    - by BlackberryFan
    I have two mysql tables. They are laid out in this manner: user_info id | emailContact _______________________ 1 | [email protected] 3 | [email protected] user_biz_info id | emailContact _________________________ 8 | [email protected] 9 | [email protected] What kind of join would I use to create a result set of information like this: id | emailContact ________________________________ 1 - [email protected] 3 - [email protected] 8 - [email protected] 9 - [email protected] I have tried the following: SELECT p.id, p.emailContact, b.id, b.emailContact FROM user_info p, user_business_info b But it seems that this is an incorrect approach. Would someone be able to suggest the correct approach in this or possibly point me in the direction of some tutorials that cover this type of mysql join, as this is what I assume is needed in this case. Thanks for your time in reading through my question!!

    Read the article

  • How can I sum a group of sums? SQL-Sever 2008

    - by billynomates
    I have a query with a sum in it like this: SELECT Table1.ID, SUM(Table2.[Number1] + Table2.[Number2]) AS SumColumn FROM Table1 INNER JOIN Table3 ON Table1.ID = Table3.ID INNER JOIN Table2 ON Table3.ID = Table2.ID WHERE (Table2.[Something] = 'Whatever') GROUP BY Table1.ID, Table2.[Number1] , Table2.[Number2] and it gives me a table like this: ID SumColumn 67 1 67 4 70 2 70 6 70 3 70 6 80 5 97 1 97 3 How can I make it give me a table like this, where the SumColumn is summed, grouped by the ID column? ID SumColumn 67 5 70 17 80 5 97 4 I cannot GROUP BY SumColumn because I get an error (Invalid column name 'SumColumn'.) COALESCE doesn't work either. Thanks in advance. EDIT: Just grouping by the ID gives me an error: [Number1, Number2 and the other column names that I'm selecting] is invalid in the select list because it is not contained in either an aggregate function or the GROUP BY clause.

    Read the article

  • How to join the results of two tables in django python

    - by user1787524
    I have two models class Weather(model.model): region = models.ForeignKey(Region) district = models.ForeignKey(District) temp_max = models.IntegerField(blank=True, null=True, verbose_name='Max temperature (C)') temp_min = models.IntegerField(blank=True, null=True, verbose_name='Min temperature (C)') and class Plan(model.model): name = tinymce_models.HTMLField(blank=True, null=True) region = models.ForeignKey(Region) district = models.ForeignKey(District) Provided for every region and district have unique row. I want to combine the result so that i can get all the columns of both tables These two Models are not related to each other. ' I need to make the join like join weather w on w.region = A.region and w.distric = A.district so that result contains all the columns in everyobject like obj.temp_max etc

    Read the article

  • MySQL UPDATE WHERE IN for each listed value separately?

    - by Tom
    Hi, I've got the following type of SQL: UPDATE photo AS f LEFT JOIN car AS c ON f.car_id=c.car_id SET f.photo_status=1 , c.photo_count=c.photo_count+1 WHERE f.photo_id IN ($ids) Basically, two tables (car & photo) are related. The list in $ids contains unique photo ids, such as (34, 87, 98, 12). With the query, I'm setting the status of each photo in that list to "1" in the photo table and simultaneously incrementing the photo count in the car table for the car at hand. It works but there's one snag: Because the list can contain multiple photo ids that relate to the same car, the photo count only ever gets incremented once. If the list had 10 photos associated with the same car, photo_count would become 1 .... whereas I'd like to increment it to 10. Is there a way to make the incrementation occur for each photo individually through the join, as opposed to MySQL overthinking it for me? I hope the above makes sense. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Hibernate and mssql inner join rowcount

    - by ez2sarang
    I am struggling with Hibernate Criteria. My aim is to create the following request using Hibernate Criteria : select count(*) as y0_ from PInterface this_ inner join Product product2_ on this_.product_id=product2_.id where this_.product_interface_type_id=? Here is my code: @Entity @Table(name = "PInterface") public class PInterface { @Id @GeneratedValue @Column(name = "id", nullable = false, insertable = false, updatable = false) private int id; @Column(name = "product_id") private int productId; @Column(name = "product_interface_type_id") private int type; @ManyToOne(optional=false) @JoinColumn(name = "product_id", referencedColumnName = "id", insertable=false, updatable=false) private Product product; } @Entity @Table(name = "Product") public class Product { @Id @GeneratedValue @Column(name = "id", nullable = false, insertable = false, updatable = false) private int id; private String name; } //Criteria is : Object criteria = sessionFactory.getCurrentSession() .createCriteria(PInterface.class) .add(Restrictions.eq("type", 1)) .setProjection(Projections.rowCount()) .uniqueResult() ; However, the results ... select count(*) as y0_ from PInterface this_ where this_.product_interface_type_id=? Where Inner join? Thank you for help!

    Read the article

  • Can i lock a record from a join sql statment using ROWLOCK,UPDLOCK ?

    - by Andrea.Ko
    I have a store procedure to get the data i want: SELECT a.SONum, a.Seq1, a.SptNum, a.Qty1, a.SalUniPriP, a.PayNum, a.InvNum, a.BLNum, c.ETD, c.ShpNum, f.IssBan FROM OrdD a JOIN OrdH b ON a.SONum = b.SONum LEFT JOIN Invh c ON a.InvNum = c.InvNum LEFT JOIN cus d ON b.CusCod = d.CusCod LEFT JOIN BL e ON a.BLNum = e.BLNum LEFT JOIN PayMasH f ON f.PayNum = a.PayNum LEFT JOIN Shipment g ON g.ShpNum = c.ShpNum WHERE b.CusCod IN (SELECT CusCod FROM UsrInc WHERE UseID=@UserID and UseLev=@UserLvl) AND d.CusGrp = @CusGrp After i get those records into cursor, i used RowLock, UpdLock to lock all the related invoice number. SELECT InvNum FROM Invh WITH (ROWLOCK,UPDLOCK) WHERE InvNum = Can i issue locking on the table INVH at the point i select the table from a few table using join command? Any advice, please!

    Read the article

  • C# how to calculate hashcode from an object reference.

    - by Wayne
    Folks, here's a thorny problem for you! A part of the TickZoom system must collect instances of every type of object into a Dictionary< type. It is imperative that their equality and hash code be based on the instance of the object which means reference equality instead of value equality. The challenge is that some of the objects in the system have overridden Equals() and GetHashCode() for use as value equality and their internal values will change over time. That means that their Equals and GetHashCode are useless. How to solve this generically rather than intrusively? So far, We created a struct to wrap each object called ObjectHandle for hashing into the Dictionary. As you see below we implemented Equals() but the problem of how to calculate a hash code remains. public struct ObjectHandle : IEquatable<ObjectHandle>{ public object Object; public bool Equals(ObjectHandle other) { return object.ReferenceEquals(this.Object,other.Object); } } See? There is the method object.ReferenceEquals() which will compare reference equality without regard for any overridden Equals() implementation in the object. Now, how to calculate a matching GetHashCode() by only considering the reference without concern for any overridden GetHashCode() method? Ahh, I hope this give you an interesting puzzle. We're stuck over here. Sincerely, Wayne

    Read the article

  • Improve Log Exceptions

    - by Jaider
    I am planning to use log4net in a new web project. In my experience, I see how big the log table can get, also I notice that errors or exceptions are repeated. For instance, I just query a log table that have more than 132.000 records, and I using distinct and found that only 2.500 records are unique (~2%), the others (~98%) are just duplicates. so, I came up with this idea to improve logging. Having a couple of new columns: counter and updated_dt, that are updated every time try to insert same record. If want to track the user that cause the exception, need to create a user_log or log_user table, to map N-N relationship. Create this model may made the system slow and inefficient trying to compare all these long text... Here the trick, we should also has a hash column of binary of 16 or 32, that hash the message and the exception, and configure an index on it. We can use HASHBYTES to help us. I am not an expert in DB, but I think that will made the faster way to locate a similar record. And because hashing doesn't guarantee uniqueness, will help to locale those similar record much faster and later compare by message or exception directly to make sure that are unique. This is a theoretical/practical solution, but will it work or bring more complexity? what aspects I am leaving out or what other considerations need to have? the trigger will do the job of insert or update, but is the trigger the best way to do it?

    Read the article

  • Is sending a hashed password over the wire a security hole?

    - by Ubiquitous Che
    I've come across a system that is in use by a company that we are considering partnering with on a medium-sized (for us, not them) project. They have a web service that we will need to integrate with. My current understanding of proper username/password management is that the username may be stored as plaintext in the database. Every user should have a unique pseudo-random salt, which may also be stored in plaintext. The text of their password must be concatenated with the salt and then this combined string may be hashed and stored in the database in an nvarchar field. So long as passwords are submitted to the website (or web service) over plaintext, everything should be just lovely. Feel free to rip into my understanding as summarized above if I'm wrong. Anyway, back to the subject at hand. The WebService run by this potential partner doesn't accept username and password, which I had anticipated. Instead, it accepts two string fields named 'Username' and 'PasswordHash'. The 'PasswordHash' value that I have been given does indeed look like a hash, and not just a value for a mis-named password field. This is raising a red flag for me. I'm not sure why, but I feel uncomfortable sending a hashed password over the wire for some reason. Off the top of my head I can't think of a reason why this would be a bad thing... Technically, the hash is available on the database anyway. But it's making me nervous, and I'm not sure if there's a reason for this or if I'm just being paranoid.

    Read the article

  • Hashing Function for Map C++

    - by Josh
    I am trying to determine a hash function which takes an input (i, k) and determines a unique solution. The possible inputs for (i, k) range from 0 to 100. Consider each (i, k) as a position of a node in a trinomial tree. Ex: (0, 0) can diverge to (1, 1) (1, 0) (1, -1). (1, 1) can diverge to (2, 2) (2, 1) (2, 0). Sample given here: http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://sfb649.wiwi.hu-berlin.de/fedc_homepage/xplore/tutorials/stfhtmlimg1156.gif&imgrefurl=http://sfb649.wiwi.hu-berlin.de/fedc_homepage/xplore/tutorials/stfhtmlnode41.html&h=413&w=416&sz=4&tbnid=OegDZu-yeVitZM:&tbnh=90&tbnw=91&zoom=1&usg=__9uQWDNYNLV14YioWWbrqPgfa3DQ=&docid=2hhitNyRWjI_DM&hl=en&sa=X&ei=xAfFUIbyG8nzyAHv2YDICg&ved=0CDsQ9QEwAQ I am using a map map <double, double> hash_table I need a key value to be determined from pairs (i, k) to hash to to value for that (i, k) So far I was only able to come up with linear functions such as: double Hash_function(int i, int k) { //double val = pow(i, k) + i; //return (val % 4294967296); return (i*3.1415 + k*i*9.12341); } However, I cannot determine a unique key with a certain (i, k). What kind of functions can I use to help me do so?

    Read the article

  • The different of SHA512 between openssl and php

    - by solomon_wzs
    Here is C code: #include <openssl/sha.h> #include <stdio.h> char *hash_sha512(char *data){ SHA512_CTX ctx; char *md=malloc(sizeof(char)*(SHA512_DIGEST_LENGTH+1)); SHA512_Init(&ctx); SHA512_Update(&ctx, data, strlen(data)); SHA512_Final(md, &ctx); md[SHA512_DIGEST_LENGTH]='\0'; return md; } int main(int argc, char *argv[]){ str=hash_sha512("GFLOuJnR19881218"); printf("%s\n", str); free(str); return 1; } The output: ?<?4????IIA[r?? ?#? 6p?8jD????J?b9?????^X? Here is PHP code: $hash=hash('sha512', 'GFLOuJnR19881218', TRUE); The output: ?<??4??j??II?-A[r???? ??#??D6p?8jD???????J?b9?????^X? The results of C code and PHP code are different, what is wrong with my code?

    Read the article

  • ROW_NUMBER() VS. DISTINCT

    - by ramadan2050
    Dear All, I have a problem with ROW_NUMBER() , if i used it with DISTINCT in the following Query I have 2 scenarios: 1- run this query direct : give me for example 400 record as a result 2- uncomment a line which start with [--Uncomment1--] : give me 700 record as a result it duplicated some records not all the records what I want is to solve this problem or to find any way to show a row counter beside each row, to make a [where rownumber between 1 and 30] --Uncomment2-- if I put the whole query in a table, and then filter it , it is work but it still so slow waiting for any feedback and I will appreciate that Thanks in advance SELECT * FROM (SELECT Distinct CRSTask.ID AS TaskID, CRSTask.WFLTaskID, --Uncomment1-- ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER By CRSTask.CreateDate asc ) AS RowNum , CRSTask.WFLStatus AS Task_WFLStatus, CRSTask.Name AS StepName, CRSTask.ModifiedDate AS Task_ModifyDate, CRSTask.SendingDate AS Task_SendingDate, CRSTask.ReceiveDate AS Task_ReceiveDate, CRSTask.CreateDate AS Task_CreateDate, CRS_Task_Recipient_Vw.Task_CurrentSenderName, CRS_Task_Recipient_Vw.Task_SenderName, CRS_INFO.ID AS CRS_ID, CRS_INFO.ReferenceNumber, CRS_INFO.CRSBeneficiaries, CRS_INFO.BarCodeNumber, ISNULL(dbo.CRS_FNC_GetTaskReceiver(CRSTask.ID), '') + ' ' + ISNULL (CRS_Organization.ArName, '') AS OrgName, CRS_Info.IncidentID, COALESCE(CRS_Subject.ArSubject, '??? ????') AS ArSubject, COALESCE(CRS_INFO.Subject, 'Blank Subject') AS CRS_Subject, CRS_INFO.Mode, CRS_Task_Recipient_Vw.ReceiverID, CRS_Task_Recipient_Vw.ReceiverType, CRS_Task_Recipient_Vw.CC, Temp_Portal_Users_View.ID AS CRS_LockedByID, Temp_Portal_Users_View.ArabicName AS CRS_LockedByName, CRSDraft.ID AS DraftID, CRSDraft.Type AS DraftType, CASE WHEN CRS_Folder = 1 THEN Task_SenderName WHEN CRS_Folder = 2 THEN Task_SenderName WHEN CRS_Folder = 3 THEN Task_CurrentSenderName END AS SenderName, CRS_Task_Folder_Vw.CRS_Folder, CRS_INFO.Status, CRS_INFO.CRS_Type, CRS_Type.arName AS CRS_Type_Name FROM CRS_Task_Folder_Vw LEFT OUTER JOIN CRSTask ON CRSTask.ID = CRS_Task_Folder_Vw.TaskID LEFT OUTER JOIN CRS_INFO ON CRS_INFO.ID = CRSTask.CRSID LEFT OUTER JOIN CRS_Subject ON COALESCE( SUBSTRING( CRS_INFO.Subject, CHARINDEX('_', CRS_INFO.Subject) + 1, LEN(CRS_INFO.Subject) ), 'Blank Subject' ) = CRS_Subject.ID LEFT OUTER JOIN CRSInfoAttribute ON CRS_INFO.ID = CRSInfoAttribute.ID LEFT OUTER JOIN CRS_Organization ON CRS_Organization.ID = CRSInfoAttribute.SourceID LEFT OUTER JOIN CRS_Type ON CRS_INFO.CRS_Type = CRS_Type.ID LEFT OUTER JOIN CRS_Way ON CRS_INFO.CRS_Send_Way = CRS_Way.ID LEFT OUTER JOIN CRS_Priority ON CRS_INFO.CRS_Priority_ID = CRS_Priority.ID LEFT OUTER JOIN CRS_SecurityLevel ON CRS_INFO.SecurityLevelID = CRS_SecurityLevel.ID LEFT OUTER JOIN Portal_Users_View ON Portal_Users_View.ID = CRS_INFO.CRS_Initiator LEFT OUTER JOIN AD_DOC_TBL ON CRS_INFO.DocumentID = AD_DOC_TBL.ID LEFT OUTER JOIN CRSTask AS Temp_CRSTask ON CRSTask.ParentTask = Temp_CRSTask.ID LEFT OUTER JOIN Portal_Users_View AS Temp_Portal_Users_View ON Temp_Portal_Users_View.ID = AD_DOC_TBL.Lock_User_ID LEFT OUTER JOIN Portal_Users_View AS Temp1_Portal_Users_View ON Temp1_Portal_Users_View.ID = CRS_INFO.ClosedBy LEFT OUTER JOIN CRSDraft ON CRSTask.ID = CRSDraft.TaskID LEFT OUTER JOIN CRS_Task_Recipient_Vw ON CRSTask.ID = CRS_Task_Recipient_Vw.TaskID --LEFT OUTER JOIN CRSTaskReceiverUsers ON CRSTask.ID = CRSTaskReceiverUsers.CRSTaskID AND CRS_Task_Recipient_Vw.ReceiverID = CRSTaskReceiverUsers.ReceiverID LEFT OUTER JOIN CRSTaskReceiverUserProfile ON CRSTask.ID = CRSTaskReceiverUserProfile.TaskID WHERE Crs_Info.SUBJECT <> 'Blank Subject' AND (CRS_INFO.Subject NOT LIKE '%null%') AND CRS_Info.IsDeleted <> 1 /* AND CRSTask.WFLStatus <> 6 AND CRSTask.WFLStatus <> 8 */ AND ( ( CRS_Task_Recipient_Vw.ReceiverID IN (1, 29) AND CRS_Task_Recipient_Vw.ReceiverType IN (1, 3, 4) ) ) AND 1 = 1 )Codes --Uncomment2-- WHERE Codes.RowNum BETWEEN 1 AND 30 ORDER BY Codes.Task_CreateDate ASC

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52  | Next Page >