Search Results

Search found 25589 results on 1024 pages for 'software developers'.

Page 45/1024 | < Previous Page | 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52  | Next Page >

  • Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 avec MSDN est désormais disponible chez SOS developers

    Mise à jour du 29/04/10 Visual Studio 2010 et .NET 4 disponibles en français Documentation comprise Il y a deux semaines, Visual Studio 2010 sortait officiellement. Officiellement. Mais en anglais. Mais aujourd'hui les choses changent puisque le célèbre IDE de Microsoft (documentation comprise) est disponible dans plusieurs autres langues, dont le français. Plus d'informations sur Visual Studio 2010 et .NET 4 en français.

    Read the article

  • Team Software Development using Ruby on Rails

    - by Panoy
    I used to work alone on small to medium sized programming projects before and have no experience working in a team environment. Currently, there will be 3 of us in an in-house software development team that is tasked to develop a number of software for an academic institution. We have decided to use the web for the majority of the projects and are planning to choose Ruby on Rails for this and I would like to ask for your inputs, advices and approaches with regards to software development as a team using the RoR web framework. One thing that has really confounded me is how you divide the programming tasks of a project if there are 3 of you that are really doing the coding. It’s obvious that we as developers approach a problem in a modular way and finish it one after another. If the project consists of 3 modules, should each one of us focus on each of those modules? Would it be faster that way? How about if the 3 of us would focus on one module first (that’s what I really prefer). Is using a distributed version control system such as Git the answer to this type of problem? Please don’t forget to put your tips and experiences with regards to team software development. Cheers!

    Read the article

  • Regulation of the software industry

    - by Flexo
    Every few years someone proposes tighter regulation for the software industry. This IEEE article has been getting some attention lately on the subject. If software engineers who write programs for systems that expose the public to physical or financial risk knew they would be tested on their competence, the thinking goes, it would reduce the flaws and failures in code—and maybe save a few lives in the bargain. I'm skeptical about the value and merit of this. To my mind it looks like a land grab by those that proposed it. The quote that clinches that for me is: The exam will test for basic knowledge, not mastery of subject matter because the big failures (e.g. THERAC-25) seem to be complex, subtle issues that "basic knowledge" would never be sufficient to prevent. Ignoring any local issues (such as existing protections of the title Engineer in some jurisdictions): The aims are noble - avoid the quacks/charlatans1 and make that distinction more obvious to those that buy their software. Can tighter regulation of the software industry ever achieve it's original goal? 1 Exactly as regulation of the medical profession was intended to do.

    Read the article

  • WP7 Developers at Washington University

    - by Scott Spradlin
    This is Easter weekend, and the end of the school year is looming closer! Our developer sessions at WashU end today. Students will turn their spare time focus to finals and getting home for the summer. Over this short course of time, we’ve had a bit over 50 students show some level of interest in developing apps for Windows Phone. Currently the total apps submitted by students is approaching about 20. Several students have received new phones as part of their agreement to submit applications.

    Read the article

  • Easter eggs as IP protection in software

    - by Simon
    I work in embedded software, and for some reason, management wants to hide an Easter egg as means of IP protection. They call it a watermark, and since our software interact with the video preview feed (the image displayed on a screen before you take a photo), they want me to implement a trigger which will react to some unusual video input (a video konami code like dark - bright - dark - bright - whatever). When this trigger fires, something strange happens (which is outside of the normal behavior of the software). The goal is to check whether our software is included in a device. Does it sound like a good idea? I have many argument against this move: What if the konami code is too sensitive and user triggers it? Does this kind of watermark have any legal value? What if this "feature" is discovered by the client? The performance penalty should be very small, since the soft run on small devices. I am the one developping this trigger. If things go wrong, what is my responsibility? What is your opinion about this method? I can't find a link, but I remember seeing an answer on this site suggesting that putting Easter eggs for protection purpose was a good idea. Has anyone tried it with good results?

    Read the article

  • Focus On Systems Admins and Developers

    - by rickramsey
    Even if you're not going to Oracle Open World, you might find it interesting to hear what the different technology groups at Oracle are going to be talking about. And if you are going, here's your Systems schedule: Note: all links go to PDF files. Focus On: Oracle Linux Focus On: Oracle Solaris Focus On: Oracle Solaris Cluster Focus On: Oracle Solaris Studio Focus On: Desktop Virtualization Focus On: Oracle VM Server Virtualization Focus On: SPARC Servers Focus On: Storage Focus On: SPARC Supercluster - Rick Website Newsletter Facebook Twitter

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52  | Next Page >