Possible Duplicate:
What's wrong with always being root?
All modern brands of Linux highly discourage (or disable) one from running as root instead of a normal user.
I do not understand why.
As a "normal" user, one could
Download a rouge program from the internet.
Run it (After all, one isn't root, what can it do).
It installs itself in .bashrc or .xinitrc
It writes a rouge "sudo" and "su" and adds . to the path
Not noticing that . is in path, one runs sudo.
The rouge program now has root password and can do anything it wants in the system.
Even if 3-6 doesn't happen, the program could still
Be part of a botnet.
Read all files in the home directory and send them back (mine for SS#, Credit Card numbers, bank account numbers, etc).
Send spam.
Run a backdoor server to allow an attacker a chance to connect to the machine to determine vulnerabilities.
It seems that the whole "permissions" thing (root/non-root) is just to prevent amateur crackers from getting into the system, so the question is:
Is there a point in avoiding running as root, and is there a way to protect oneself if one wants to run unsafe code?
