Search Results

Search found 9366 results on 375 pages for 'common lisp'.

Page 47/375 | < Previous Page | 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54  | Next Page >

• 10 Free Productivity Tools for Linux

  <b>Linux.com:</b> "Common wisdom says that Linux lacks applications. Fortunately, the common wisdom is dead wrong on this, especially when it comes to productivity applications."

  Read the article

• Becoming the well-integrated content company (and combating AIUTLVFS)

  - by Lance Shaw

  Every single day, each of us create more and more content. Sometimes it is brand new material and many times it is iterations of existing content, but no one would argue that information and content growth is growing at an almost exponential rate. With all this content being created and stored, a number of problems naturally arise. One of the most common issues that users run into is "Am I Using The Latest Version of this File Syndrome", or AIUTLVFS. This insidious syndrome is all too common and results in ineffective, poor or downright wrong business decisions being made.  When content or files are unavailable or incorrect within the scope of key business processes, the chance for erroneous and costly business decisions is magnified even further. For many companies, the ideal scenario is to be able to connect multiple business systems, both old and new, into one common content repository.  Not only does this reduce content duplication, it also helps guarantee that everyone in various departments is working off the proverbial "same page".  Sounds simple - but for many organizations, the proliferation of file shares, SharePoint sites, and other storage silos of content keep the dream of a more efficient business a distant one. We've created some online assets to help you in your evaluation and eventual improvement of your current content management and delivery systems. Take a few minutes to check out our Online Assessment Tool.  It's quick, easy and just might provide you with insights into how you can improve your current content ecosystem. While you are there, check out our new Infographic that outlines common issues faced by companies today. Feel free to save our informative Infographic PDF and share it with business colleagues and your management to help them understand the business costs and impact of inaction. Together we can stop AIUTLVFS in its tracks and run our businesses more effectively than ever. Additionally, we hope you will take a few minutes to visit our new and informative webpages dedicated to the value of a well connected, fully integrated content management system. It's a great place to learn more about how integrating WebCenter Content into your infrastructure can lower your operational costs while boosting process and worker efficiency.

  Read the article

• What's the best way to create a static utility class in python? Is using metaclasses code smell?

  - by rsimp

  Ok so I need to create a bunch of utility classes in python. Normally I would just use a simple module for this but I need to be able to inherit in order to share common code between them. The common code needs to reference the state of the module using it so simple imports wouldn't work well. I don't like singletons, and classes that use the classmethod decorator do not have proper support for python properties. One pattern I see used a lot is creating an internal python class prefixed with an underscore and creating a single instance which is then explicitly imported or set as the module itself. This is also used by fabric to create a common environment object (fabric.api.env). I've realized another way to accomplish this would be with metaclasses. For example: #util.py class MetaFooBase(type): @property def file_path(cls): raise NotImplementedError def inherited_method(cls): print cls.file_path #foo.py from util import * import env class MetaFoo(MetaFooBase): @property def file_path(cls): return env.base_path + "relative/path" def another_class_method(cls): pass class Foo(object): __metaclass__ = MetaFoo #client.py from foo import Foo file_path = Foo.file_path I like this approach better than the first pattern for a few reasons: First, instantiating Foo would be meaningless as it has no attributes or methods, which insures this class acts like a true single interface utility, unlike the first pattern which relies on the underscore convention to dissuade client code from creating more instances of the internal class. Second, sub-classing MetaFoo in a different module wouldn't be as awkward because I wouldn't be importing a class with an underscore which is inherently going against its private naming convention. Third, this seems to be the closest approximation to a static class that exists in python, as all the meta code applies only to the class and not to its instances. This is shown by the common convention of using cls instead of self in the class methods. As well, the base class inherits from type instead of object which would prevent users from trying to use it as a base for other non-static classes. It's implementation as a static class is also apparent when using it by the naming convention Foo, as opposed to foo, which denotes a static class method is being used. As much as I think this is a good fit, I feel that others might feel its not pythonic because its not a sanctioned use for metaclasses which should be avoided 99% of the time. I also find most python devs tend to shy away from metaclasses which might affect code reuse/maintainability. Is this code considered code smell in the python community? I ask because I'm creating a pypi package, and would like to do everything I can to increase adoption.

  Read the article

• Will you share your SQL Server configuration?

  - by Bill Graziano

  I regularly visit client sites and review their SQL Server configurations.  I come across all kinds of strange settings.  I’ve been thinking about a way to aggregate people’s configurations and see what’s common and what’s unique.  I used to do that with polls on SQLTeam.com.  I think we can find out more interesting things if we look at combinations of settings in relation to size and volume. I’ve been working on an application for another project that is similar.  It will be fairly easy to use that code for this.  I can have something up and running in a few days – if people are interested in it.  I admit that I often come up with ideas that just don’t make sense.  This may be one of them.  One of your biggest concerns has be how secure your data is.  My solution is not to store anything identifying.  The instance name and database names can both be “anonymized” and I don’t store the machine name or IP address or anything to do with logins. Some of the questions I’m curious about are: At what size database does the Enterprise Edition become prevalent? Given the total size of the databases how much RAM is common? How many people have multiple data files?  At what size does that become prevalent? How common is database mirroring?  Replication?  Log shipping? How common is full recovery mode?  At what data size does it become prevalent? I think those are all questions that are easy to answer -- with the right data.  The big question is whether or not people will share their SQL Server configurations.  I understand that organizations in regulated or high security environments can’t participate.  But I think that leaves many, many people that can.  Are you willing to share your configuration and learn about others?  I have a simple sign up form here.  It’s actually a mailing list signup that also captures your edition, number of servers and largest database.  The list will only be used for this project.  Is your SQL Server is configured correctly?  Do you wonder what the next step is as your data grows?  Take a second and sign up.

  Read the article

• EJIE usage of Oracle WebLogic Server and Oracle Coherence

  - by rob.misek

  Watch Mike Lehmann, Senior Director of Product Management from Oracle and Oscar Guadilla, Senior Architect from EJIE, Basque Government's IT Company, discuss EJIE's implementation of Oracle WebLogic Server and Oracle Coherence. Hear EJIE's history with Oracle WebLogic Server, how and why they are using it for its web application platform, common services, file services, and intranet and the benefits they are gleaning. In addition, hear how EJIE is using WebLogic JMS for document management common service integration in its Eco-government project. Watch from the beginning or jump to the details of their Coherence usage (10:15)

  Read the article

• 404 when doing safe-upgrade in lucid 64 box?

  - by Millisami

  Why I see 404 when doing sudo aptitude safe-upgrade in my lucid 64 box? deploy@li167-251:~$ sudo aptitude safe-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done The following packages will be upgraded: apache2 apache2-mpm-prefork apache2-threaded-dev apache2-utils apache2.2-bin apache2.2-common apt apt-utils base-files binutils bzip2 dpkg dpkg-dev gzip ifupdown krb5-multidev language-pack-en language-pack-en-base language-selector-common libatk1.0-0 libatk1.0-dev libavahi-client3 libavahi-common-data libavahi-common3 libbz2-1.0 libc-bin libc-dev-bin libc6 libc6-dev libc6-i686 libcups2 libfreetype6 libfreetype6-dev libglib2.0-0 libglib2.0-dev libgssapi-krb5-2 libgssrpc4 libgtk2.0-0 libgtk2.0-common libgtk2.0-dev libk5crypto3 libkadm5clnt-mit7 libkadm5srv-mit7 libkdb5-4 libkrb5-3 libkrb5-dev libkrb5support0 libldap-2.4-2 libldap2-dev libmysqlclient-dev libmysqlclient16 libnotify-dev libnotify1 libpam-modules libpam-runtime libpam0g libparted0debian1 libpng12-0 libpng12-dev libpq-dev libpq5 libssl-dev libssl0.9.8 libtiff4 libudev0 libusb-0.1-4 linux-libc-dev mountall mysql-client mysql-client-5.1 mysql-client-core-5.1 mysql-common mysql-server mysql-server-5.1 mysql-server-core-5.1 openssh-client openssh-server openssl parted python-apt sudo tzdata udev upstart ureadahead wget xulrunner-1.9.2 xulrunner-1.9.2-dev The following packages are RECOMMENDED but will NOT be installed: colibri debhelper fakeroot hicolor-icon-theme libatk1.0-data libglib2.0-data libgtk2.0-bin libhtml-template-perl manpages-dev notification-daemon notify-osd ssl-cert xauth xfce4-notifyd 88 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 85.8MB of archives. After unpacking 1712kB will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] y Writing extended state information... Done Get:1 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main libpam-modules 1.1.1-2ubuntu5 [358kB] Get:2 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main base-files 5.0.0ubuntu20.10.04.2 [70.2kB] Get:3 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main gzip 1.3.12-9ubuntu1.1 [102kB] Err http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main libc-bin 2.11.1-0ubuntu7.2 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.88.37 80] Err http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main libc6 2.11.1-0ubuntu7.2 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.88.37 80] Err http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main libc6-i686 2.11.1-0ubuntu7.2 .........

  Read the article

• Adventures in Windows 8: Working around the navigation animation issues in LayoutAwarePage

  - by Laurent Bugnion

  LayoutAwarePage is a pretty cool add-on to Windows 8 apps, which facilitates greatly the implementation of orientation-aware (portrait, landscape) as well as state-aware (snapped, filled, fullscreen) apps. It has however a few issues that are obvious when you use transformed elements on your page. Adding a LayoutAwarePage to your application If you start with a blank app, the MainPage is a vanilla Page, with no such feature. In order to have a LayoutAwarePage into your app, you need to add this class (and a few helpers) with the following operation: Right click on the Solution and select Add, New Item from the context menu. From the dialog, select a Basic Page (not a Blank Page, which is another vanilla page). If you prefer, you can also use Split Page, Items Page, Item Detail Page, Grouped Items Page or Group Detail Page which are all LayoutAwarePages. Personally I like to start with a Basic Page, which gives me more creative freedom. Adding this new page will cause Visual Studio to show a prompt asking you for permission to add additional helper files to the Common folder. One of these helpers in the LayoutAwarePage class, which is where the magic happens. LayoutAwarePage offers some help for the detection of orientation and state (which makes it a pleasure to design for all these scenarios in Blend, by the way) as well as storage for the navigation state (more about that in a future article). Issue with LayoutAwarePage When you use UI elements such as a background picture, a watermark label, logos, etc, it is quite common to do a few things with those: Making them partially transparent (this is especially true for background pictures; for instance I really like a black Page background with a half transparent picture placed on top of it). Transforming them, for instance rotating them a bit, scaling them, etc. Here is an example with a picture of my two beautiful daughters in the Bird Park in Kuala Lumpur, as well as a transformed TextBlock. The image has an opacity of 40% and the TextBlock a simple RotateTransform. If I create an application with a MainPage that navigates to this LayoutAwarePage, however, I will have a very annoying effect: The background picture appears with an Opacity of 100%. The TextBlock is not rotated. This lasts only for less than a second (during the navigation animation) before the elements “snap into place” and get their desired effect. Here is the XAML that cause the annoying effect: <common:LayoutAwarePage x:Name="pageRoot" x:Class="App13.BasicPage1" xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml" xmlns:common="using:App13.Common" xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008" xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006" mc:Ignorable="d"> <Grid Style="{StaticResource LayoutRootStyle}"> <Grid.RowDefinitions> <RowDefinition Height="140" /> <RowDefinition Height="*" /> </Grid.RowDefinitions> <Image Source="Assets/el20120812025.jpg" Stretch="UniformToFill" Opacity="0.4" Grid.RowSpan="2" /> <Grid> <Grid.ColumnDefinitions> <ColumnDefinition Width="Auto" /> <ColumnDefinition Width="*" /> </Grid.ColumnDefinitions> <Button x:Name="backButton" Click="GoBack" IsEnabled="{Binding Frame.CanGoBack, ElementName=pageRoot}" Style="{StaticResource BackButtonStyle}" /> <TextBlock x:Name="pageTitle" Grid.Column="1" Text="Welcome" Style="{StaticResource PageHeaderTextStyle}" /> </Grid> <TextBlock HorizontalAlignment="Center" TextWrapping="Wrap" Text="Welcome to my Windows 8 Application" Grid.Row="1" VerticalAlignment="Bottom" FontFamily="Segoe UI Light" FontSize="70" FontWeight="Light" TextAlignment="Center" Foreground="#FFFFA200" RenderTransformOrigin="0.5,0.5" UseLayoutRounding="False" d:LayoutRounding="Auto" Margin="0,0,0,153"> <TextBlock.RenderTransform> <CompositeTransform Rotation="-6.545" /> </TextBlock.RenderTransform> </TextBlock> <VisualStateManager.VisualStateGroups> [...] </VisualStateManager.VisualStateGroups> </Grid> </common:LayoutAwarePage> Solving the issue In order to solve this “snapping” issue, the solution is to wrap the elements that are transformed into an empty Grid. Honestly, to me it sounds like a bug in the LayoutAwarePage navigation animation, but thankfully the workaround is not that difficult: Simple change the main Grid as follows: <Grid Style="{StaticResource LayoutRootStyle}"> <Grid.RowDefinitions> <RowDefinition Height="140" /> <RowDefinition Height="*" /> </Grid.RowDefinitions> <Grid Grid.RowSpan="2"> <Image Source="Assets/el20120812025.jpg" Stretch="UniformToFill" Opacity="0.4" /> </Grid> <Grid> <Grid.ColumnDefinitions> <ColumnDefinition Width="Auto" /> <ColumnDefinition Width="*" /> </Grid.ColumnDefinitions> <Button x:Name="backButton" Click="GoBack" IsEnabled="{Binding Frame.CanGoBack, ElementName=pageRoot}" Style="{StaticResource BackButtonStyle}" /> <TextBlock x:Name="pageTitle" Grid.Column="1" Text="Welcome" Style="{StaticResource PageHeaderTextStyle}" /> </Grid> <Grid Grid.Row="1"> <TextBlock HorizontalAlignment="Center" TextWrapping="Wrap" Text="Welcome to my Windows 8 Application" VerticalAlignment="Bottom" FontFamily="Segoe UI Light" FontSize="70" FontWeight="Light" TextAlignment="Center" Foreground="#FFFFA200" RenderTransformOrigin="0.5,0.5" UseLayoutRounding="False" d:LayoutRounding="Auto" Margin="0,0,0,153"> <TextBlock.RenderTransform> <CompositeTransform Rotation="-6.545" /> </TextBlock.RenderTransform> </TextBlock> </Grid> <VisualStateManager.VisualStateGroups> [...] </Grid> Hopefully this will help a few people, I banged my head on the wall for a while before someone at Microsoft pointed me to the solution ;) Happy coding, Laurent   Laurent Bugnion (GalaSoft) Subscribe | Twitter | Facebook | Flickr | LinkedIn

  Read the article

• CommonFilter and CommonData solutions on CodePlex updated

  - by TATWORTH

  The CommonFilter and CommonData solutions on Codeplex have been updated post VS2010 SP1. The respective URLs are: http://commondata.codeplex.com/releases/view/62502 http://commonfilter.codeplex.com/releases/view/62499 CommonFilter is a cut-down version of CommonData containing just the filter functions. Common Data contains a vast number of useful functions for building ASP.NET web sites including: Lightweight reporting to a custome event log Filter functions for common types of data input

  Read the article

• Shared Layout, Style, Images and Javascript

  Nowadays it's very common for a medium/large scale company to have many websites. Users should be presented with the same look and feel in all the wesites for better user experiences. This article shows how to define the common layout, images and styles once and how to use them for all web sites using ASP.NET.Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

  Read the article

• Shared Layout, Style, Images and Javascript

  Nowadays it's very common for a medium/large scale company to have many websites. Users should be presented with the same look and feel in all the wesites for better user experiences. This article shows how to define the common layout, images and styles once and how to use them for all web sites using ASP.NET.

  Read the article

• Interaction of a GUI-based App and Windows Service

  - by psubsee2003

  I am working on personal project that will be designed to help manage my media library, specifically recordings created by Windows Media Center. So I am going to have the following parts to this application: A Windows Service that monitors the recording folder. Once a new recording is completed that meets specific criteria, it will call several 3rd party CLI Applications to remove the commercials and re-encode the video into a more hard-drive friendly format. A controller GUI to be able to modify settings of the service, specifically add new shows to watch for, and to modify parameters for the CLI Applications A standalone (GUI-based) desktop application that can perform many of the same functions as the windows service, expect manually on specific files instead of automatically based on specific criteria. (It should be mentioned that I have limited experience with an application of this complexity, and I have absolutely zero experience with Windows Services) Since the 1st and 3rd bullet share similar functionality, my design plan is to pull the common functionality into a separate library shared by both parts applications, but these 2 components do not need to interact otherwise. The 2nd and 3rd bullets seem to share some common functionality, both will have a GUI, both will have to help define similar parameters (one to send to the service and the other to send directly to the CLI applications), so I can see some advantage to combining them into the same application. On the other hand, the standalone application (bullet #3) really does not need to interact with the service at all, except for possibly sharing a few common default parameters that can easily be put into an XML in a common location, so it seems to make more sense to just keep everything separate. The controller GUI (2nd bullet) is where I am stuck at the moment. Do I just roll this functionality (allow for user interaction with the service to update settings and criteria) into the standalone application? Or would it be a better design decision to keep them separate? Specifically, I'm worried about adding the complexity of communicating with the Windows Service to the standalone application when it doesn't need it. Is WCF the right approach to allow the controller GUI to interact with the Windows Service? Or is there a better alternative? At the moment, I don't envision a need for a significant amount of interaction, maybe just adding a new task once in a while and occasionally tweaking a parameter, but when something is changed, I do expect the windows service to immediately use the new settings.

  Read the article

• To reorganize code, what to choose between library and service?

  - by essbeev

  I want to reorganize a large application with lot of code duplication into multiple components. Plus, some code is also duplicated over other applications. The common set of functionality that can be taken out of main application is clearly defined. Now, do I write a library or do I write a service for this functionality; so that all such applications continue to work and there is only one code-base (of common functionality) to maintain ?

  Read the article

• ubuntu 12.04 installation problem on windows 7 64bit

  - by zakariya

  06-26 20:57 ERROR TaskList: Extraction failed with code: 2 Traceback (most recent call last): File "\lib\wubi\backends\common\tasklist.py", line 197, in __call__ File "\lib\wubi\backends\win32\backend.py", line 450, in extract_diskimage Exception: Extraction failed with code: 2 06-26 20:57 DEBUG TaskList: # Cancelling tasklist 06-26 20:57 DEBUG TaskList: # Finished tasklist 06-26 20:57 ERROR root: Extraction failed with code: 2 Traceback (most recent call last): File "\lib\wubi\application.py", line 58, in run File "\lib\wubi\application.py", line 132, in select_task File "\lib\wubi\application.py", line 158, in run_installer File "\lib\wubi\backends\common\tasklist.py", line 197, in __call__ File "\lib\wubi\backends\win32\backend.py", line 450, in extract_diskimage Exception: Extraction failed with code: 2

  Read the article

• Error during installation of an SQL server Failover Cluster Instance

  A common issue I've run into while helping with SQL Server Failover Cluster (FCI) installations is the failure of the Network Name. In the following post I'll discuss a bit of background, the common root cause, and how to resolve it. Countless happy developers. One award-winning bundle.The SQL Developer Bundle can transform the way you and your team work, aiding collaboration, efficiency, and consistency. Download your free trial now.

  Read the article

• MySQL: Functional Partitioning

  This article contains common different methods of functional partitioning and common considerations for database setup and capacity. Company DBAs, database developers, engineers and architects should consider the pros and cons of any method of sharding or partitioning since compromises will have to be made given the pros and cons of a system setup.

  Read the article

• MySQL: Functional Partitioning

  This article contains common different methods of functional partitioning and common considerations for database setup and capacity. Company DBAs, database developers, engineers and architects should consider the pros and cons of any method of sharding or partitioning since compromises will have to be made given the pros and cons of a system setup.

  Read the article

• MySQL: Functional Partitioning

  <b>Database Journal:</b> "This post contains common different methods of functional partitioning and common considerations for database setup and capacity."

  Read the article

• List of freely available programming books

  - by Karan Bhangui

  I'm trying to amass a list of programming books with opensource licenses, like Creative Commons, GPL, etc. The books can be about a particular programming language or about computers in general. Hoping you guys could help: Languages BASH Advanced Bash-Scripting Guide (An in-depth exploration of the art of shell scripting) C The C book C++ Thinking in C++ C++ Annotations How to Think Like a Computer Scientist C# .NET Book Zero: What the C or C++ Programmer Needs to Know About C# and the .NET Framework Illustrated C# 2008 (Dead Link) Data Structures and Algorithms with Object-Oriented Design Patterns in C# Threading in C# Common Lisp Practical Common Lisp On Lisp Java Thinking in Java How to Think Like a Computer Scientist Java Thin-Client Programming JavaScript Eloquent JavaScript Haskell Real world Haskell Learn You a Haskell for Great Good! Objective-C The Objective-C Programming Language Perl Extreme Perl (license not specified - home page is saying "freely available") The Mason Book (Open Publication License) Practical mod_perl (CreativeCommons Attribution Share-Alike License) Higher-Order Perl Learning Perl the Hard Way PHP Practical PHP Programming Zend Framework: Survive the Deep End PowerShell Mastering PowerShell Prolog Building Expert Systems in Prolog Adventure in Prolog Prolog Programming A First Course Logic, Programming and Prolog (2ed) Introduction to Prolog for Mathematicians Learn Prolog Now! Natural Language Processing Techniques in Prolog Python Dive Into Python Dive Into Python 3 How to Think Like a Computer Scientist A Byte of Python Python for Fun Invent Your Own Computer Games With Python Ruby Why's (Poignant) Guide to Ruby Programming Ruby - The Pragmatic Programmer's Guide Mr. Neighborly's Humble Little Ruby Book SQL Practical PostgreSQL x86 assembly Paul Carter's tutorial Lua Programming In Lua (for v5 but still largely relevant) Algorithms and Data Structures Algorithms Data Structures and Algorithms with Object-Oriented Design Patterns in Java Planning Algorithms Frameworks/Projects The Django Book The Pylons Book Introduction to Design Patterns in C++ with Qt 4 (Open Publication License) Version control The SVN Book Mercurial: The Definitive Guide Pro Git UNIX / Linux The Art of Unix Programming Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Others Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs The Little Book of Semaphores Mathematical Logic - an Introduction An Introduction to the Theory of Computation Developers Developers Developers Developers Linkers and loaders Beej's Guide to Network Programming Maven: The Definitive Guide I will expand on this list as I get comments or when I think of more :D Related: Programming texts and reference material for my Kindle What are some good free programming books? Can anyone recommend a free software engineering book? Edit: Oh I didn't notice the community wiki feature. Feel free to edit your suggestions right in!

  Read the article

• Reading multiple Emacs info files simultaneously

  - by pajato0

  For reading programming (and other) documentation, the Emacs INFO mode is outstanding. So outstanding that I would like to be able to read say, the Emacs Lisp info file and the org-mode info files simultaneously without traversing back up to the beginning of the info tree. Either I've missed something obvious or I will need to hack some Emacs Lisp to achieve the goal. And yet again, someone may have already cracked this nut. So I guess my question is: what is the state of the practice for reading mulitple INFO files in Emacs simultaneously?

  Read the article

• Are there any purely functional Schemes or Lisps?

  - by nickname

  Over the past few months, I've put a lot of effort into learning (or attempting to learn) several functional programming languages. I really like math, so they have been very natural for me to use. Simply to be more specific, I have tried Common Lisp, Scheme, Haskell, OCaml, and (a little bit of) Erlang. I did not like the syntax of OCaml and do not have enough Erlang knowledge to make a judgment on it yet. Because of its consistent and beautiful (non-)syntax, I really like Scheme. However, I really do appreciate the stateless nature of purely functional programming languages such as Haskell. Haskell looks very interesting, but the amount of inconsistent and non-extendable syntax really bothered me. In the interest of preventing a Lisp vs Haskell flame war, just pretend that I can't use Haskell for some other reason. Therefore, my question is: Are there any purely functional Schemes (or Lisps in general)?

  Read the article

• Creating a new buffer with text using EmacsClient

  - by User1

  I have a program that can send text to any other program for further analysis (eg sed, grep, etc). I would like it to send the data to Emacs and do analysis there. How would I do that? EmacsClient takes a filename by default, this is a data string not a file and I really don't want to create and delete files just to send data to Emacs. EmacsClient has an "eval" command-line option that let's you execute lisp code instead of open files. Is there a simple lisp function that will open a new buffer with the given text?

  Read the article

• What is a good programming language for AI?

  - by Mark

  Besides Lisp and Prolog what is a good programming language for programming intelligent systems?

  Read the article

• Configuring Fed Authentication Methods in OIF / IdP

  - by Damien Carru

  In this article, I will provide examples on how to configure OIF/IdP to map OAM Authentication Schemes to Federation Authentication Methods, based on the concepts introduced in my previous entry. I will show examples for the three protocols supported by OIF: SAML 2.0 SSO SAML 1.1 SSO OpenID 2.0 Enjoy the reading! Configuration As I mentioned in my previous article, mapping Federation Authentication Methods to OAM Authentication Schemes is protocol dependent, since the methods are defined in the various protocols (SAML 2.0, SAML 1.1, OpenID 2.0). As such, the WLST commands to set those mappings will involve: Either the SP Partner Profile and affect all Partners referencing that profile, which do not override the Federation Authentication Method to OAM Authentication Scheme mappings Or the SP Partner entry, which will only affect the SP Partner It is important to note that if an SP Partner is configured to define one or more Federation Authentication Method to OAM Authentication Scheme mappings, then all the mappings defined in the SP Partner Profile will be ignored. WLST Commands The two OIF WLST commands that can be used to define mapping Federation Authentication Methods to OAM Authentication Schemes are: addSPPartnerProfileAuthnMethod() to define a mapping on an SP Partner Profile, taking as parameters: The name of the SP Partner Profile The Federation Authentication Method The OAM Authentication Scheme name addSPPartnerAuthnMethod() to define a mapping on an SP Partner , taking as parameters: The name of the SP Partner The Federation Authentication Method The OAM Authentication Scheme name Note: I will discuss in a subsequent article the other parameters of those commands. In the next sections, I will show examples on how to use those methods: For SAML 2.0, I will configure the SP Partner Profile, that will apply all the mappings to SP Partners referencing this profile, unless they override mapping definition For SAML 1.1, I will configure the SP Partner. For OpenID 2.0, I will configure the SP/RP Partner SAML 2.0 Test Setup In this setup, OIF is acting as an IdP and is integrated with a remote SAML 2.0 SP partner identified by AcmeSP. In this test, I will perform Federation SSO with OIF/IdP configured to: Use LDAPScheme as the Authentication Scheme Use BasicScheme as the Authentication Scheme Map BasicSessionScheme  to  the urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:ac:classes:Password Federation Authentication Method Use OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme as the Authentication Scheme Map OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme to  the urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:ac:classes:PasswordProtectedTransport Federation Authentication Method LDAPScheme as Authentication Scheme Using the OOTB settings regarding user authentication in OAM, the user will be challenged via a FORM based login page based on the LDAPScheme. Also the default Federation Authentication Method mappings configuration maps only the urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:ac:classes:PasswordProtectedTransport to LDAPScheme (also marked as the default scheme used for authentication), FAAuthScheme, BasicScheme and BasicFAScheme. After authentication via FORM, OIF/IdP would issue an Assertion similar to: <samlp:Response ...>    <saml:Issuer ...>https://idp.com/oam/fed</saml:Issuer>    <samlp:Status>        <samlp:StatusCode Value="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:status:Success"/>    </samlp:Status>    <saml:Assertion ...>        <saml:Issuer ...>https://idp.com/oam/fed</saml:Issuer>        <dsig:Signature>            ...        </dsig:Signature>        <saml:Subject>            <saml:NameID ...>[email protected]</saml:NameID>            <saml:SubjectConfirmation Method="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:cm:bearer">                <saml:SubjectConfirmationData .../>            </saml:SubjectConfirmation>        </saml:Subject>        <saml:Conditions ...>            <saml:AudienceRestriction>                <saml:Audience>https://acme.com/sp</saml:Audience>            </saml:AudienceRestriction>        </saml:Conditions>        <saml:AuthnStatement AuthnInstant="2014-03-21T20:53:55Z" SessionIndex="id-6i-Dm0yB-HekG6cejktwcKIFMzYE8Yrmqwfd0azz" SessionNotOnOrAfter="2014-03-21T21:53:55Z">            <saml:AuthnContext>                <saml:AuthnContextClassRef>                   urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:ac:classes:PasswordProtectedTransport                </saml:AuthnContextClassRef>            </saml:AuthnContext>        </saml:AuthnStatement>    </saml:Assertion></samlp:Response> BasicScheme as Authentication Scheme For this test, I will switch the default Authentication Scheme for the SP Partner Profile to BasicScheme instead of LDAPScheme. I will use the OIF WLST setSPPartnerProfileDefaultScheme() command and specify which scheme to be used as the default for the SP Partner Profile referenced by AcmeSP (which is saml20-sp-partner-profile in this case: getFedPartnerProfile("AcmeSP", "sp") ): Enter the WLST environment by executing:$IAM_ORACLE_HOME/common/bin/wlst.sh Connect to the WLS Admin server:connect() Navigate to the Domain Runtime branch:domainRuntime() Execute the setSPPartnerProfileDefaultScheme() command:setSPPartnerProfileDefaultScheme("saml20-sp-partner-profile", "BasicScheme") Exit the WLST environment:exit() The user will now be challenged via HTTP Basic Authentication defined in the BasicScheme for AcmeSP. Also, as noted earlier, the default Federation Authentication Method mappings configuration maps only the urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:ac:classes:PasswordProtectedTransport to LDAPScheme (also marked as the default scheme used for authentication), FAAuthScheme, BasicScheme and BasicFAScheme. After authentication via HTTP Basic Authentication, OIF/IdP would issue an Assertion similar to: <samlp:Response ...>    <saml:Issuer ...>https://idp.com/oam/fed</saml:Issuer>    <samlp:Status>        <samlp:StatusCode Value="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:status:Success"/>    </samlp:Status>    <saml:Assertion ...>        <saml:Issuer ...>https://idp.com/oam/fed</saml:Issuer>        <dsig:Signature>            ...        </dsig:Signature>        <saml:Subject>            <saml:NameID ...>[email protected]</saml:NameID>            <saml:SubjectConfirmation Method="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:cm:bearer">                <saml:SubjectConfirmationData .../>            </saml:SubjectConfirmation>        </saml:Subject>        <saml:Conditions ...>            <saml:AudienceRestriction>                <saml:Audience>https://acme.com/sp</saml:Audience>            </saml:AudienceRestriction>        </saml:Conditions>        <saml:AuthnStatement AuthnInstant="2014-03-21T20:53:55Z" SessionIndex="id-6i-Dm0yB-HekG6cejktwcKIFMzYE8Yrmqwfd0azz" SessionNotOnOrAfter="2014-03-21T21:53:55Z">            <saml:AuthnContext>                <saml:AuthnContextClassRef>                   urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:ac:classes:PasswordProtectedTransport                </saml:AuthnContextClassRef>            </saml:AuthnContext>        </saml:AuthnStatement>    </saml:Assertion></samlp:Response> Mapping BasicScheme To change the Federation Authentication Method mapping for the BasicScheme to urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:ac:classes:Password instead of urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:ac:classes:PasswordProtectedTransport for the saml20-sp-partner-profile SAML 2.0 SP Partner Profile (the profile to which my AcmeSP Partner is bound to), I will execute the addSPPartnerProfileAuthnMethod() method: Enter the WLST environment by executing:$IAM_ORACLE_HOME/common/bin/wlst.sh Connect to the WLS Admin server:connect() Navigate to the Domain Runtime branch:domainRuntime() Execute the addSPPartnerProfileAuthnMethod() command:addSPPartnerProfileAuthnMethod("saml20-sp-partner-profile", "urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:ac:classes:Password", "BasicScheme") Exit the WLST environment:exit() After authentication via HTTP Basic Authentication, OIF/IdP would now issue an Assertion similar to (see that the AuthnContextClassRef was changed from PasswordProtectedTransport to Password): <samlp:Response ...>    <saml:Issuer ...>https://idp.com/oam/fed</saml:Issuer>    <samlp:Status>        <samlp:StatusCode Value="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:status:Success"/>    </samlp:Status>    <saml:Assertion ...>        <saml:Issuer ...>https://idp.com/oam/fed</saml:Issuer>        <dsig:Signature>            ...        </dsig:Signature>        <saml:Subject>            <saml:NameID ...>[email protected]</saml:NameID>            <saml:SubjectConfirmation Method="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:cm:bearer">                <saml:SubjectConfirmationData .../>            </saml:SubjectConfirmation>        </saml:Subject>        <saml:Conditions ...>            <saml:AudienceRestriction>                <saml:Audience>https://acme.com/sp</saml:Audience>            </saml:AudienceRestriction>        </saml:Conditions>        <saml:AuthnStatement AuthnInstant="2014-03-21T20:53:55Z" SessionIndex="id-6i-Dm0yB-HekG6cejktwcKIFMzYE8Yrmqwfd0azz" SessionNotOnOrAfter="2014-03-21T21:53:55Z">            <saml:AuthnContext>                <saml:AuthnContextClassRef>                   urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:ac:classes:Password                </saml:AuthnContextClassRef>            </saml:AuthnContext>        </saml:AuthnStatement>    </saml:Assertion></samlp:Response> OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme as Authentication Scheme For this test, I will switch the default Authentication Scheme for the SP Partner Profile to OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme instead of BasicScheme. I will use the OIF WLST setSPPartnerProfileDefaultScheme() command and specify which scheme to be used as the default for the SP Partner Profile referenced by AcmeSP (which is saml20-sp-partner-profile in this case: getFedPartnerProfile("AcmeSP", "sp") ): Enter the WLST environment by executing:$IAM_ORACLE_HOME/common/bin/wlst.sh Connect to the WLS Admin server:connect() Navigate to the Domain Runtime branch:domainRuntime() Execute the setSPPartnerProfileDefaultScheme() command:setSPPartnerProfileDefaultScheme("saml20-sp-partner-profile", "OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme") Exit the WLST environment:exit() The user will now be challenged via FORM defined in the OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme for AcmeSP. Contrarily to LDAPScheme and BasicScheme, the OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme is not mapped by default to any Federation Authentication Methods. As such, OIF/IdP will not be able to find a Federation Authentication Method and will set the method in the SAML Assertion to the OAM Authentication Scheme name. After authentication via FORM, OIF/IdP would issue an Assertion similar to (see the AuthnContextClassRef set to OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme): <samlp:Response ...>    <saml:Issuer ...>https://idp.com/oam/fed</saml:Issuer>    <samlp:Status>        <samlp:StatusCode Value="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:status:Success"/>    </samlp:Status>    <saml:Assertion ...>        <saml:Issuer ...>https://idp.com/oam/fed</saml:Issuer>        <dsig:Signature>            ...        </dsig:Signature>        <saml:Subject>            <saml:NameID ...>[email protected]</saml:NameID>            <saml:SubjectConfirmation Method="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:cm:bearer">                <saml:SubjectConfirmationData .../>            </saml:SubjectConfirmation>        </saml:Subject>        <saml:Conditions ...>            <saml:AudienceRestriction>                <saml:Audience>https://acme.com/sp</saml:Audience>            </saml:AudienceRestriction>        </saml:Conditions>        <saml:AuthnStatement AuthnInstant="2014-03-21T20:53:55Z" SessionIndex="id-6i-Dm0yB-HekG6cejktwcKIFMzYE8Yrmqwfd0azz" SessionNotOnOrAfter="2014-03-21T21:53:55Z">            <saml:AuthnContext>                <saml:AuthnContextClassRef> OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme                </saml:AuthnContextClassRef>            </saml:AuthnContext>        </saml:AuthnStatement>    </saml:Assertion></samlp:Response> Mapping OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme To add the OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme  to the Federation Authentication Method urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:ac:classes:PasswordProtectedTransport mapping, I will execute the addSPPartnerProfileAuthnMethod() method: Enter the WLST environment by executing:$IAM_ORACLE_HOME/common/bin/wlst.sh Connect to the WLS Admin server:connect() Navigate to the Domain Runtime branch:domainRuntime() Execute the addSPPartnerProfileAuthnMethod() command:addSPPartnerProfileAuthnMethod("saml20-sp-partner-profile", "urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:ac:classes:PasswordProtectedTransport", "OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme") Exit the WLST environment:exit() After authentication via FORM, OIF/IdP would now issue an Assertion similar to (see that the method was changed from OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme to PasswordProtectedTransport): <samlp:Response ...>    <saml:Issuer ...>https://idp.com/oam/fed</saml:Issuer>    <samlp:Status>        <samlp:StatusCode Value="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:status:Success"/>    </samlp:Status>    <saml:Assertion ...>        <saml:Issuer ...>https://idp.com/oam/fed</saml:Issuer>        <dsig:Signature>            ...        </dsig:Signature>        <saml:Subject>            <saml:NameID ...>[email protected]</saml:NameID>            <saml:SubjectConfirmation Method="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:cm:bearer">                <saml:SubjectConfirmationData .../>            </saml:SubjectConfirmation>        </saml:Subject>        <saml:Conditions ...>            <saml:AudienceRestriction>                <saml:Audience>https://acme.com/sp</saml:Audience>            </saml:AudienceRestriction>        </saml:Conditions>        <saml:AuthnStatement AuthnInstant="2014-03-21T20:53:55Z" SessionIndex="id-6i-Dm0yB-HekG6cejktwcKIFMzYE8Yrmqwfd0azz" SessionNotOnOrAfter="2014-03-21T21:53:55Z">            <saml:AuthnContext>                <saml:AuthnContextClassRef>                   urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:ac:classes:PasswordProtectedTransport                </saml:AuthnContextClassRef>            </saml:AuthnContext>        </saml:AuthnStatement>    </saml:Assertion></samlp:Response> SAML 1.1 Test Setup In this setup, OIF is acting as an IdP and is integrated with a remote SAML 1.1 SP partner identified by AcmeSP. In this test, I will perform Federation SSO with OIF/IdP configured to: Use LDAPScheme as the Authentication Scheme Use OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme as the Authentication Scheme Map OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme to  the urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:ac:classes:PasswordProtectedTransport Federation Authentication Method Use LDAPScheme as the Authentication Scheme Map LDAPScheme to  the urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:ac:classes:PasswordProtectedTransport Federation Authentication Method LDAPScheme as Authentication Scheme Using the OOTB settings regarding user authentication in OAM, the user will be challenged via a FORM based login page based on the LDAPScheme. Also the default Federation Authentication Method mappings configuration maps only the urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.0:am:password to LDAPScheme (also marked as the default scheme used for authentication), FAAuthScheme, BasicScheme and BasicFAScheme. After authentication via FORM, OIF/IdP would issue an Assertion similar to: <samlp:Response ...>    <samlp:Status>        <samlp:StatusCode Value="samlp:Success"/>    </samlp:Status>    <saml:Assertion Issuer="https://idp.com/oam/fed" ...>        <saml:Conditions ...>            <saml:AudienceRestriction>                <saml:Audience>https://acme.com/sp/ssov11</saml:Audience>            </saml:AudienceRestriction>        </saml:Conditions>        <saml:AuthnStatement AuthenticationInstant="2014-03-21T20:53:55Z" AuthenticationMethod="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.0:am:password">            <saml:Subject>                <saml:NameIdentifier ...>[email protected]</saml:NameIdentifier>                <saml:SubjectConfirmation>                   <saml:ConfirmationMethod>                       urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.0:cm:bearer                   </saml:ConfirmationMethod>                </saml:SubjectConfirmation>            </saml:Subject>        </saml:AuthnStatement>        <dsig:Signature>            ...        </dsig:Signature>    </saml:Assertion></samlp:Response> OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme as Authentication Scheme For this test, I will switch the default Authentication Scheme for the SP Partner to OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme instead of LDAPScheme. I will use the OIF WLST setSPPartnerDefaultScheme() command and specify which scheme to be used as the default for the SP Partner: Enter the WLST environment by executing:$IAM_ORACLE_HOME/common/bin/wlst.sh Connect to the WLS Admin server:connect() Navigate to the Domain Runtime branch:domainRuntime() Execute the setSPPartnerDefaultScheme() command:setSPPartnerDefaultScheme("AcmeSP", "OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme") Exit the WLST environment:exit() The user will be challenged via FORM defined in the OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme for AcmeSP. Contrarily to LDAPScheme, the OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme is not mapped by default to any Federation Authentication Methods (in the SP Partner Profile). As such, OIF/IdP will not be able to find a Federation Authentication Method and will set the method in the SAML Assertion to the OAM Authentication Scheme name. After authentication via FORM, OIF/IdP would issue an Assertion similar to (see the AuthenticationMethod set to OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme): <samlp:Response ...>    <samlp:Status>        <samlp:StatusCode Value="samlp:Success"/>    </samlp:Status>    <saml:Assertion Issuer="https://idp.com/oam/fed" ...>        <saml:Conditions ...>            <saml:AudienceRestriction>                <saml:Audience>https://acme.com/sp/ssov11</saml:Audience>            </saml:AudienceRestriction>        </saml:Conditions>        <saml:AuthnStatement AuthenticationInstant="2014-03-21T20:53:55Z" AuthenticationMethod="OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme">            <saml:Subject>                <saml:NameIdentifier ...>[email protected]</saml:NameIdentifier>                <saml:SubjectConfirmation>                   <saml:ConfirmationMethod>                       urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.0:cm:bearer                   </saml:ConfirmationMethod>                </saml:SubjectConfirmation>            </saml:Subject>        </saml:AuthnStatement>        <dsig:Signature>            ...        </dsig:Signature>    </saml:Assertion></samlp:Response> Mapping OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme To map the OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme  to the Federation Authentication Method urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.0:am:password for this SP Partner only, I will execute the addSPPartnerAuthnMethod() method: Enter the WLST environment by executing:$IAM_ORACLE_HOME/common/bin/wlst.sh Connect to the WLS Admin server:connect() Navigate to the Domain Runtime branch:domainRuntime() Execute the addSPPartnerAuthnMethod() command:addSPPartnerAuthnMethod("AcmeSP", "urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.0:am:password", "OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme") Exit the WLST environment:exit() After authentication via FORM, OIF/IdP would now issue an Assertion similar to (see that the method was changed from OAMLDAPPluginAuthnScheme to password): <samlp:Response ...>    <samlp:Status>        <samlp:StatusCode Value="samlp:Success"/>    </samlp:Status>    <saml:Assertion Issuer="https://idp.com/oam/fed" ...>        <saml:Conditions ...>            <saml:AudienceRestriction>                <saml:Audience>https://acme.com/sp/ssov11</saml:Audience>            </saml:AudienceRestriction>        </saml:Conditions>        <saml:AuthnStatement AuthenticationInstant="2014-03-21T20:53:55Z" AuthenticationMethod="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.0:am:password">            <saml:Subject>                <saml:NameIdentifier ...>[email protected]</saml:NameIdentifier>                <saml:SubjectConfirmation>                   <saml:ConfirmationMethod>                       urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.0:cm:bearer                   </saml:ConfirmationMethod>                </saml:SubjectConfirmation>            </saml:Subject>        </saml:AuthnStatement>        <dsig:Signature>            ...        </dsig:Signature>    </saml:Assertion></samlp:Response> LDAPScheme as Authentication Scheme I will now show that by defining a Federation Authentication Mapping at the Partner level, this now ignores all mappings defined at the SP Partner Profile level. For this test, I will switch the default Authentication Scheme for this SP Partner back to LDAPScheme, and the Assertion issued by OIF/IdP will not be able to map this LDAPScheme to a Federation Authentication Method anymore, since A Federation Authentication Method mapping is defined at the SP Partner level and thus the mappings defined at the SP Partner Profile are ignored The LDAPScheme is not listed in the mapping at the Partner level I will use the OIF WLST setSPPartnerDefaultScheme() command and specify which scheme to be used as the default for this SP Partner: Enter the WLST environment by executing:$IAM_ORACLE_HOME/common/bin/wlst.sh Connect to the WLS Admin server:connect() Navigate to the Domain Runtime branch:domainRuntime() Execute the setSPPartnerDefaultScheme() command:setSPPartnerDefaultScheme("AcmeSP", "LDAPScheme") Exit the WLST environment:exit() After authentication via FORM, OIF/IdP would issue an Assertion similar to (see the AuthenticationMethod set to LDAPScheme): <samlp:Response ...>    <samlp:Status>        <samlp:StatusCode Value="samlp:Success"/>    </samlp:Status>    <saml:Assertion Issuer="https://idp.com/oam/fed" ...>        <saml:Conditions ...>            <saml:AudienceRestriction>                <saml:Audience>https://acme.com/sp/ssov11</saml:Audience>            </saml:AudienceRestriction>        </saml:Conditions>        <saml:AuthnStatement AuthenticationInstant="2014-03-21T20:53:55Z" AuthenticationMethod="LDAPScheme">            <saml:Subject>                <saml:NameIdentifier ...>[email protected]</saml:NameIdentifier>                <saml:SubjectConfirmation>                   <saml:ConfirmationMethod>                       urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.0:cm:bearer                   </saml:ConfirmationMethod>                </saml:SubjectConfirmation>            </saml:Subject>        </saml:AuthnStatement>        <dsig:Signature>            ...        </dsig:Signature>    </saml:Assertion></samlp:Response> Mapping LDAPScheme at Partner Level To fix this issue, we will need to add the LDAPScheme  to the Federation Authentication Method urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.0:am:password mapping for this SP Partner only. I will execute the addSPPartnerAuthnMethod() method: Enter the WLST environment by executing:$IAM_ORACLE_HOME/common/bin/wlst.sh Connect to the WLS Admin server:connect() Navigate to the Domain Runtime branch:domainRuntime() Execute the addSPPartnerAuthnMethod() command:addSPPartnerAuthnMethod("AcmeSP", "urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.0:am:password", "LDAPScheme") Exit the WLST environment:exit() After authentication via FORM, OIF/IdP would now issue an Assertion similar to (see that the method was changed from LDAPScheme to password): <samlp:Response ...>    <samlp:Status>        <samlp:StatusCode Value="samlp:Success"/>    </samlp:Status>    <saml:Assertion Issuer="https://idp.com/oam/fed" ...>        <saml:Conditions ...>            <saml:AudienceRestriction>                <saml:Audience>https://acme.com/sp/ssov11</saml:Audience>            </saml:AudienceRestriction>        </saml:Conditions>        <saml:AuthnStatement AuthenticationInstant="2014-03-21T20:53:55Z" AuthenticationMethod="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.0:am:password">            <saml:Subject>                <saml:NameIdentifier ...>[email protected]</saml:NameIdentifier>                <saml:SubjectConfirmation>                   <saml:ConfirmationMethod>                       urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.0:cm:bearer                   </saml:ConfirmationMethod>                </saml:SubjectConfirmation>            </saml:Subject>        </saml:AuthnStatement>        <dsig:Signature>            ...        </dsig:Signature>    </saml:Assertion></samlp:Response> OpenID 2.0 In the OpenID 2.0 flows, the RP must request use of PAPE, in order for OIF/IdP/OP to include PAPE information. For OpenID 2.0, the configuration will involve mapping a list of OpenID 2.0 policies to a list of Authentication Schemes. The WLST command will take a list of policies, delimited by the ',' character, instead of SAML 2.0 or SAML 1.1 where a single Federation Authentication Method had to be specified. Test Setup In this setup, OIF is acting as an IdP/OP and is integrated with a remote OpenID 2.0 SP/RP partner identified by AcmeRP. In this test, I will perform Federation SSO with OIF/IdP configured to: Use LDAPScheme as the Authentication Scheme Map LDAPScheme to  the http://schemas.openid.net/pape/policies/2007/06/phishing-resistant and http://openid-policies/password-protected policies Federation Authentication Methods (the second one is a custom for this use case) LDAPScheme as Authentication Scheme Using the OOTB settings regarding user authentication in OAM, the user will be challenged via a FORM based login page based on the LDAPScheme. No Federation Authentication Method is defined OOTB for OpenID 2.0, so if the IdP/OP issue an SSO response with a PAPE Response element, it will specify the scheme name instead of Federation Authentication Methods After authentication via FORM, OIF/IdP would issue an SSO Response similar to: https://acme.com/openid?refid=id-9PKVXZmRxAeDYcgLqPm36ClzOMA-&openid.ns=http%3A%2F%2Fspecs.openid.net%2Fauth%2F2.0&openid.mode=id_res&openid.op_endpoint=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.com%2Fopenid&openid.claimed_id=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.com%2Fopenid%3Fid%3Did-38iCmmlAVEXPsFjnFVKArfn5RIiF75D5doorhEgqqPM%3D&openid.identity=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.com%2Fopenid%3Fid%3Did-38iCmmlAVEXPsFjnFVKArfn5RIiF75D5doorhEgqqPM%3D&openid.return_to=https%3A%2F%2Facme.com%2Fopenid%3Frefid%3Did-9PKVXZmRxAeDYcgLqPm36ClzOMA-&openid.response_nonce=2014-03-24T19%3A20%3A06Zid-YPa2kTNNFftZkgBb460jxJGblk2g--iNwPpDI7M1&openid.assoc_handle=id-6a5S6zhAKaRwQNUnjTKROREdAGSjWodG1el4xyz3&openid.ns.ax=http%3A%2F%2Fopenid.net%2Fsrv%2Fax%2F1.0&openid.ax.mode=fetch_response&openid.ax.type.attr0=http%3A%2F%2Fsession%2Fcount&openid.ax.value.attr0=1&openid.ax.type.attr1=http%3A%2F%2Fopenid.net%2Fschema%2FnamePerson%2Ffriendly&openid.ax.value.attr1=My+name+is+Bobby+Smith&openid.ax.type.attr2=http%3A%2F%2Fschemas.openid.net%2Fax%2Fapi%2Fuser_id&openid.ax.value.attr2=bob&openid.ax.type.attr3=http%3A%2F%2Faxschema.org%2Fcontact%2Femail&openid.ax.value.attr3=bob%40oracle.com&openid.ax.type.attr4=http%3A%2F%2Fsession%2Fipaddress&openid.ax.value.attr4=10.145.120.253&openid.ns.pape=http%3A%2F%2Fspecs.openid.net%2Fextensions%2Fpape%2F1.0&openid.pape.auth_time=2014-03-24T19%3A20%3A05Z&openid.pape.auth_policies=LDAPScheme&openid.signed=op_endpoint%2Cclaimed_id%2Cidentity%2Creturn_to%2Cresponse_nonce%2Cassoc_handle%2Cns.ax%2Cax.mode%2Cax.type.attr0%2Cax.value.attr0%2Cax.type.attr1%2Cax.value.attr1%2Cax.type.attr2%2Cax.value.attr2%2Cax.type.attr3%2Cax.value.attr3%2Cax.type.attr4%2Cax.value.attr4%2Cns.pape%2Cpape.auth_time%2Cpape.auth_policies&openid.sig=mYMgbGYSs22l8e%2FDom9NRPw15u8%3D Mapping LDAPScheme To map the LDAP Scheme to the http://schemas.openid.net/pape/policies/2007/06/phishing-resistant and http://openid-policies/password-protected policies Federation Authentication Methods, I will execute the addSPPartnerAuthnMethod() method (the policies will be comma separated): Enter the WLST environment by executing:$IAM_ORACLE_HOME/common/bin/wlst.sh Connect to the WLS Admin server:connect() Navigate to the Domain Runtime branch:domainRuntime() Execute the addSPPartnerAuthnMethod() command:addSPPartnerAuthnMethod("AcmeRP", "http://schemas.openid.net/pape/policies/2007/06/phishing-resistant,http://openid-policies/password-protected", "LDAPScheme") Exit the WLST environment:exit() After authentication via FORM, OIF/IdP would now issue an Assertion similar to (see that the method was changed from LDAPScheme to the two policies): https://acme.com/openid?refid=id-9PKVXZmRxAeDYcgLqPm36ClzOMA-&openid.ns=http%3A%2F%2Fspecs.openid.net%2Fauth%2F2.0&openid.mode=id_res&openid.op_endpoint=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.com%2Fopenid&openid.claimed_id=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.com%2Fopenid%3Fid%3Did-38iCmmlAVEXPsFjnFVKArfn5RIiF75D5doorhEgqqPM%3D&openid.identity=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.com%2Fopenid%3Fid%3Did-38iCmmlAVEXPsFjnFVKArfn5RIiF75D5doorhEgqqPM%3D&openid.return_to=https%3A%2F%2Facme.com%2Fopenid%3Frefid%3Did-9PKVXZmRxAeDYcgLqPm36ClzOMA-&openid.response_nonce=2014-03-24T19%3A20%3A06Zid-YPa2kTNNFftZkgBb460jxJGblk2g--iNwPpDI7M1&openid.assoc_handle=id-6a5S6zhAKaRwQNUnjTKROREdAGSjWodG1el4xyz3&openid.ns.ax=http%3A%2F%2Fopenid.net%2Fsrv%2Fax%2F1.0&openid.ax.mode=fetch_response&openid.ax.type.attr0=http%3A%2F%2Fsession%2Fcount&openid.ax.value.attr0=1&openid.ax.type.attr1=http%3A%2F%2Fopenid.net%2Fschema%2FnamePerson%2Ffriendly&openid.ax.value.attr1=My+name+is+Bobby+Smith&openid.ax.type.attr2=http%3A%2F%2Fschemas.openid.net%2Fax%2Fapi%2Fuser_id&openid.ax.value.attr2=bob&openid.ax.type.attr3=http%3A%2F%2Faxschema.org%2Fcontact%2Femail&openid.ax.value.attr3=bob%40oracle.com&openid.ax.type.attr4=http%3A%2F%2Fsession%2Fipaddress&openid.ax.value.attr4=10.145.120.253&openid.ns.pape=http%3A%2F%2Fspecs.openid.net%2Fextensions%2Fpape%2F1.0&openid.pape.auth_time=2014-03-24T19%3A20%3A05Z&openid.pape.auth_policies=http%3A%2F%2Fschemas.openid.net%2Fpape%2Fpolicies%2F2007%2F06%2Fphishing-resistant+http%3A%2F%2Fopenid-policies%2Fpassword-protected&openid.signed=op_endpoint%2Cclaimed_id%2Cidentity%2Creturn_to%2Cresponse_nonce%2Cassoc_handle%2Cns.ax%2Cax.mode%2Cax.type.attr0%2Cax.value.attr0%2Cax.type.attr1%2Cax.value.attr1%2Cax.type.attr2%2Cax.value.attr2%2Cax.type.attr3%2Cax.value.attr3%2Cax.type.attr4%2Cax.value.attr4%2Cns.pape%2Cpape.auth_time%2Cpape.auth_policies&openid.sig=mYMgbGYSs22l8e%2FDom9NRPw15u8%3D In the next article, I will cover how OIF/IdP can be configured so that an SP can request a specific Federation Authentication Method to challenge the user during Federation SSO.Cheers,Damien Carru

  Read the article

• ASP.NET MVC 3: Layouts and Sections with Razor

  - by ScottGu

  This is another in a series of posts I’m doing that cover some of the new ASP.NET MVC 3 features: Introducing Razor (July 2nd) New @model keyword in Razor (Oct 19th) Layouts with Razor (Oct 22nd) Server-Side Comments with Razor (Nov 12th) Razor’s @: and <text> syntax (Dec 15th) Implicit and Explicit code nuggets with Razor (Dec 16th) Layouts and Sections with Razor (Today) In today’s post I’m going to go into more details about how Layout pages work with Razor.  In particular, I’m going to cover how you can have multiple, non-contiguous, replaceable “sections” within a layout file – and enable views based on layouts to optionally “fill in” these different sections at runtime.  The Razor syntax for doing this is clean and concise. I’ll also show how you can dynamically check at runtime whether a particular layout section has been defined, and how you can provide alternate content (or even an alternate layout) in the event that a section isn’t specified within a view template.  This provides a powerful and easy way to customize the UI of your site and make it clean and DRY from an implementation perspective. What are Layouts? You typically want to maintain a consistent look and feel across all of the pages within your web-site/application.  ASP.NET 2.0 introduced the concept of “master pages” which helps enable this when using .aspx based pages or templates.  Razor also supports this concept with a feature called “layouts” – which allow you to define a common site template, and then inherit its look and feel across all the views/pages on your site. I previously discussed the basics of how layout files work with Razor in my ASP.NET MVC 3: Layouts with Razor blog post.  Today’s post will go deeper and discuss how you can define multiple, non-contiguous, replaceable regions within a layout file that you can then optionally “fill in” at runtime. Site Layout Scenario Let’s look at how we can implement a common site layout scenario with ASP.NET MVC 3 and Razor.  Specifically, we’ll implement some site UI where we have a common header and footer on all of our pages.  We’ll also add a “sidebar” section to the right of our common site layout.  On some pages we’ll customize the SideBar to contain content specific to the page it is included on: And on other pages (that do not have custom sidebar content) we will fall back and provide some “default content” to the sidebar: We’ll use ASP.NET MVC 3 and Razor to enable this customization in a nice, clean way.  Below are some step-by-step tutorial instructions on how to build the above site with ASP.NET MVC 3 and Razor. Part 1: Create a New Project with a Layout for the “Body” section We’ll begin by using the “File->New Project” menu command within Visual Studio to create a new ASP.NET MVC 3 Project.  We’ll create the new project using the “Empty” template option: This will create a new project that has no default controllers in it: Creating a HomeController We will then right-click on the “Controllers” folder of our newly created project and choose the “Add->Controller” context menu command.  This will bring up the “Add Controller” dialog: We’ll name the new controller we create “HomeController”.  When we click the “Add” button Visual Studio will add a HomeController class to our project with a default “Index” action method that returns a view: We won’t need to write any Controller logic to implement this sample – so we’ll leave the default code as-is.  Creating a View Template Our next step will be to implement the view template associated with the HomeController’s Index action method.  To implement the view template, we will right-click within the “HomeController.Index()” method and select the “Add View” command to create a view template for our home page: This will bring up the “Add View” dialog within Visual Studio.  We do not need to change any of the default settings within the above dialog (the name of the template was auto-populated to Index because we invoked the “Add View” context menu command within the Index method).  When we click the “Add” Button within the dialog, a Razor-based “Index.cshtml” view template will be added to the \Views\Home\ folder within our project.  Let’s add some simple default static content to it: Notice above how we don’t have an <html> or <body> section defined within our view template.  This is because we are going to rely on a layout template to supply these elements and use it to define the common site layout and structure for our site (ensuring that it is consistent across all pages and URLs within the site).  Customizing our Layout File Let’s open and customize the default “_Layout.cshtml” file that was automatically added to the \Views\Shared folder when we created our new project: The default layout file (shown above) is pretty basic and simply outputs a title (if specified in either the Controller or the View template) and adds links to a stylesheet and jQuery.  The call to “RenderBody()” indicates where the main body content of our Index.cshtml file will merged into the output sent back to the browser. Let’s modify the Layout template to add a common header, footer and sidebar to the site: We’ll then edit the “Site.css” file within the \Content folder of our project and add 4 CSS rules to it: And now when we run the project and browse to the home “/” URL of our project we’ll see a page like below: Notice how the content of the HomeController’s Index view template and the site’s Shared Layout template have been merged together into a single HTML response.  Below is what the HTML sent back from the server looks like: Part 2: Adding a “SideBar” Section Our site so far has a layout template that has only one “section” in it – what we call the main “body” section of the response.  Razor also supports the ability to add additional "named sections” to layout templates as well.  These sections can be defined anywhere in the layout file (including within the <head> section of the HTML), and allow you to output dynamic content to multiple, non-contiguous, regions of the final response. Defining the “SideBar” section in our Layout Let’s update our Layout template to define an additional “SideBar” section of content that will be rendered within the <div id=”sidebar”> region of our HTML.  We can do this by calling the RenderSection(string sectionName, bool required) helper method within our Layout.cshtml file like below:   The first parameter to the “RenderSection()” helper method specifies the name of the section we want to render at that location in the layout template.  The second parameter is optional, and allows us to define whether the section we are rendering is required or not.  If a section is “required”, then Razor will throw an error at runtime if that section is not implemented within a view template that is based on the layout file (which can make it easier to track down content errors).  If a section is not required, then its presence within a view template is optional, and the above RenderSection() code will render nothing at runtime if it isn’t defined. Now that we’ve made the above change to our layout file, let’s hit refresh in our browser and see what our Home page now looks like: Notice how we currently have no content within our SideBar <div> – that is because the Index.cshtml view template doesn’t implement our new “SideBar” section yet. Implementing the “SideBar” Section in our View Template Let’s change our home-page so that it has a SideBar section that outputs some custom content.  We can do that by opening up the Index.cshtml view template, and by adding a new “SiderBar” section to it.  We’ll do this using Razor’s @section SectionName { } syntax: We could have put our SideBar @section declaration anywhere within the view template.  I think it looks cleaner when defined at the top or bottom of the file – but that is simply personal preference.  You can include any content or code you want within @section declarations.  Notice above how I have a C# code nugget that outputs the current time at the bottom of the SideBar section.  I could have also written code that used ASP.NET MVC’s HTML/AJAX helper methods and/or accessed any strongly-typed model objects passed to the Index.cshtml view template. Now that we’ve made the above template changes, when we hit refresh in our browser again we’ll see that our SideBar content – that is specific to the Home Page of our site – is now included in the page response sent back from the server: The SideBar section content has been merged into the proper location of the HTML response : Part 3: Conditionally Detecting if a Layout Section Has Been Implemented Razor provides the ability for you to conditionally check (from within a layout file) whether a section has been defined within a view template, and enables you to output an alternative response in the event that the section has not been defined.  This provides a convenient way to specify default UI for optional layout sections.  Let’s modify our Layout file to take advantage of this capability.  Below we are conditionally checking whether the “SideBar” section has been defined without the view template being rendered (using the IsSectionDefined() method), and if so we render the section.  If the section has not been defined, then we now instead render some default content for the SideBar:  Note: You want to make sure you prefix calls to the RenderSection() helper method with a @ character – which will tell Razor to execute the HelperResult it returns and merge in the section content in the appropriate place of the output.  Notice how we wrote @RenderSection(“SideBar”) above instead of just RenderSection(“SideBar”).  Otherwise you’ll get an error. Above we are simply rendering an inline static string (<p>Default SideBar Content</p>) if the section is not defined.  A real-world site would more likely refactor this default content to be stored within a separate partial template (which we’d render using the Html.RenderPartial() helper method within the else block) or alternatively use the Html.Action() helper method within the else block to encapsulate both the logic and rendering of the default sidebar. When we hit refresh on our home-page, we will still see the same custom SideBar content we had before.  This is because we implemented the SideBar section within our Index.cshtml view template (and so our Layout rendered it): Let’s now implement a “/Home/About” URL for our site by adding a new “About” action method to our HomeController: The About() action method above simply renders a view back to the client when invoked.  We can implement the corresponding view template for this action by right-clicking within the “About()” method and using the “Add View” menu command (like before) to create a new About.cshtml view template.  We’ll implement the About.cshtml view template like below. Notice that we are not defining a “SideBar” section within it: When we browse the /Home/About URL we’ll see the content we supplied above in the main body section of our response, and the default SideBar content will rendered: The layout file determined at runtime that a custom SideBar section wasn’t present in the About.cshtml view template, and instead rendered the default sidebar content. One Last Tweak… Let’s suppose that at a later point we decide that instead of rendering default side-bar content, we just want to hide the side-bar entirely from pages that don’t have any custom sidebar content defined.  We could implement this change simply by making a small modification to our layout so that the sidebar content (and its surrounding HTML chrome) is only rendered if the SideBar section is defined.  The code to do this is below: Razor is flexible enough so that we can make changes like this and not have to modify any of our view templates (nor make change any Controller logic changes) to accommodate this.  We can instead make just this one modification to our Layout file and the rest happens cleanly.  This type of flexibility makes Razor incredibly powerful and productive. Summary Razor’s layout capability enables you to define a common site template, and then inherit its look and feel across all the views/pages on your site. Razor enables you to define multiple, non-contiguous, “sections” within layout templates that can be “filled-in” by view templates.  The @section {} syntax for doing this is clean and concise.  Razor also supports the ability to dynamically check at runtime whether a particular section has been defined, and to provide alternate content (or even an alternate layout) in the event that it isn’t specified.  This provides a powerful and easy way to customize the UI of your site - and make it clean and DRY from an implementation perspective. Hope this helps, Scott P.S. In addition to blogging, I am also now using Twitter for quick updates and to share links. Follow me at: twitter.com/scottgu

  Read the article

• YUM Update Failed - Error in POSTIN scriptlet in rpm package

  - by Tiffany Walker

  Running "yum update" and it gets to installing and then breaks. Not sure what the problem is. Google shows nothing. Error in POSTIN scriptlet in rpm package gtk2-2.18.9-10.el6.x86_64 error: error creating temporary file /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.NB84HC: Invalid argument error: Couldn't create temporary file for %post(gtk2-2.18.9-10.el6.x86_64): Invalid argument Updating : e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.12-12.el6.x86_64 44/378 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/rpmtrans.py", line 387, in callback self._instCloseFile( bytes, total, h ) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/rpmtrans.py", line 463, in _instCloseFile self.base.history.trans_data_pid_end(pid, state) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/history.py", line 858, in trans_data_pid_end """, ('TRUE', self._tid, pid, state)) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/sqlutils.py", line 168, in executeSQLQmark return cursor.execute(query, params) sqlite3.OperationalError: unable to open database file error: python callback <bound method RPMTransaction.callback of <yum.rpmtrans.RPMTransaction instance at 0x45c2290>> failed, aborting! With a check all: yum check Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, rhnplugin, security MySQL-client-5.5.27-1.cp.1132.x86_64 is obsoleted by MySQL-client-5.5.27-1.cp.1132.x86_64 MySQL-server-5.5.27-1.cp.1132.x86_64 is obsoleted by MySQL-server-5.5.27-1.cp.1132.x86_64 abrt-libs-2.0.8-6.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with abrt-libs-2.0.4-14.el6.centos.x86_64 audit-libs-2.2-2.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with audit-libs-2.1.3-3.el6.x86_64 bandmin-1.6.1-5.noarch has missing requires of perl(bandmin.conf) bandmin-1.6.1-5.noarch has missing requires of perl(bmversion.pl) bandmin-1.6.1-5.noarch has missing requires of perl(services.conf) 32:bind-libs-9.8.2-0.10.rc1.el6_3.3.x86_64 is a duplicate with 32:bind-libs-9.7.3-8.P3.el6_2.2.x86_64 cagefs-safebin-3.6-6.el6.cloudlinux.x86_64 is a duplicate with cagefs-safebin-3.5-1.el6.cloudlinux.x86_64 chkconfig-1.3.49.3-2.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with chkconfig-1.3.49.3-1.el6_2.x86_64 cloudlinux-release-6-6.3.0.x86_64 is a duplicate with cloudlinux-release-6-6.2.2.x86_64 coreutils-8.4-19.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with coreutils-8.4-16.el6.x86_64 coreutils-libs-8.4-19.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with coreutils-libs-8.4-16.el6.x86_64 1:cups-libs-1.4.2-48.el6_3.1.x86_64 is a duplicate with 1:cups-libs-1.4.2-44.el6_2.3.x86_64 1:dbus-libs-1.2.24-7.el6_3.x86_64 is a duplicate with 1:dbus-libs-1.2.24-5.el6_1.x86_64 12:dhcp-common-4.1.1-31.P1.el6_3.1.x86_64 is a duplicate with 12:dhcp-common-4.1.1-25.P1.el6_2.1.x86_64 e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.12-12.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.12-11.el6.x86_64 exim-4.80-0.x86_64 has missing requires of perl(SafeFile) expat-2.0.1-11.el6_2.x86_64 is a duplicate with expat-2.0.1-9.1.el6.x86_64 frontpage-2002-SR1.2.i386 has missing requires of libexpat.so.0 gawk-3.1.7-10.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with gawk-3.1.7-9.el6.x86_64 glib2-2.22.5-7.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with glib2-2.22.5-6.el6.x86_64 glibc-2.12-1.80.el6_3.5.x86_64 is a duplicate with glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64 glibc-common-2.12-1.80.el6_3.5.x86_64 is a duplicate with glibc-common-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64 gtk2-2.18.9-10.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with gtk2-2.18.9-6.el6.centos.x86_64 kernel-firmware-2.6.32-320.4.1.lve1.1.4.el6.noarch is obsoleted by kernel-firmware-2.6.32-320.4.1.lve1.1.4.el6.noarch kernel-firmware-2.6.32-320.4.1.lve1.1.4.el6.noarch is obsoleted by kernel-firmware-2.6.32-379.5.1.lve1.1.9.6.1.el6.noarch kernel-firmware-2.6.32-379.5.1.lve1.1.9.6.1.el6.noarch is a duplicate with kernel-firmware-2.6.32-320.4.1.lve1.1.4.el6.noarch kernel-firmware-2.6.32-379.5.1.lve1.1.9.6.1.el6.noarch is obsoleted by kernel-firmware-2.6.32-320.4.1.lve1.1.4.el6.noarch kernel-firmware-2.6.32-379.5.1.lve1.1.9.6.1.el6.noarch is obsoleted by kernel-firmware-2.6.32-379.5.1.lve1.1.9.6.1.el6.noarch kernel-headers-2.6.32-379.5.1.lve1.1.9.6.1.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with kernel-headers-2.6.32-320.4.1.lve1.1.4.el6.x86_64 keyutils-libs-1.4-4.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with keyutils-libs-1.4-3.el6.x86_64 krb5-libs-1.9-33.el6_3.3.x86_64 is a duplicate with krb5-libs-1.9-22.el6_2.1.x86_64 libblkid-2.17.2-12.7.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with libblkid-2.17.2-12.4.el6.x86_64 libcom_err-1.41.12-12.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with libcom_err-1.41.12-11.el6.x86_64 libgcc-4.4.6-4.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with libgcc-4.4.6-3.el6.x86_64 libselinux-2.0.94-5.3.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with libselinux-2.0.94-5.2.el6.x86_64 libstdc++-4.4.6-4.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with libstdc++-4.4.6-3.el6.x86_64 libtiff-3.9.4-6.el6_3.x86_64 is a duplicate with libtiff-3.9.4-5.el6_2.x86_64 libudev-147-2.42.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with libudev-147-2.40.el6.x86_64 libuuid-2.17.2-12.7.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with libuuid-2.17.2-12.4.el6.x86_64 libxml2-2.7.6-8.el6_3.3.x86_64 is a duplicate with libxml2-2.7.6-4.el6_2.4.x86_64 nspr-4.9.1-2.el6_3.x86_64 is a duplicate with nspr-4.8.9-3.el6_2.x86_64 nss-util-3.13.5-1.el6_3.x86_64 is a duplicate with nss-util-3.13.1-3.el6_2.x86_64 openssl-1.0.0-25.el6_3.1.x86_64 is a duplicate with openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.5.x86_64 python-2.6.6-29.el6_3.3.x86_64 is a duplicate with python-2.6.6-29.el6.x86_64 python-libs-2.6.6-29.el6_3.3.x86_64 is a duplicate with python-libs-2.6.6-29.el6.x86_64 readline-6.0-4.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with readline-6.0-3.el6.x86_64 sed-4.2.1-10.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with sed-4.2.1-7.el6.x86_64 tzdata-2012c-3.el6.noarch is a duplicate with tzdata-2012c-1.el6.noarch xmlrpc-c-1.16.24-1209.1840.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with xmlrpc-c-1.16.24-1200.1840.el6_1.4.x86_64 xmlrpc-c-client-1.16.24-1209.1840.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with xmlrpc-c-client-1.16.24-1200.1840.el6_1.4.x86_64 Error: check all Tried: #rm /var/lib/rpm/__db* #rpm --rebuilddb #yum clean all Tried also running yum-complete-transaction still won't finish the update. ls -ld /var/tmp/ drwxrwxrwt. 20 root root 12288 Oct 3 18:44 /var/tmp/ df -h /var/tmp/ Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /tmp 3.9G 1.2G 2.6G 32% /var/tmp Latest errors: Error: Protected multilib versions: libgcc-4.4.6-4.el6.i686 != libgcc-4.4.6-3.el6.x86_64 Error: Protected multilib versions: glibc-2.12-1.80.el6_3.5.i686 != glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64 EDITED: yum repolist Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, rhnplugin, security Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * cloudlinux-x86_64-server-6: cl.banahosting.com repo id repo name status cloudlinux-x86_64-server-6 CloudLinux Server 6 x86_64 10,948+725 repolist: 10,948 [~]# package-cleanup --dupes Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, rhnplugin xmlrpc-c-client-1.16.24-1209.1840.el6.x86_64 xmlrpc-c-client-1.16.24-1200.1840.el6_1.4.x86_64 bind-libs-9.7.3-8.P3.el6_2.2.x86_64 bind-libs-9.8.2-0.10.rc1.el6_3.3.x86_64 libblkid-2.17.2-12.4.el6.x86_64 libblkid-2.17.2-12.7.el6.x86_64 libtiff-3.9.4-5.el6_2.x86_64 libtiff-3.9.4-6.el6_3.x86_64 audit-libs-2.1.3-3.el6.x86_64 audit-libs-2.2-2.el6.x86_64 libstdc++-4.4.6-3.el6.x86_64 libstdc++-4.4.6-4.el6.x86_64 sed-4.2.1-10.el6.x86_64 sed-4.2.1-7.el6.x86_64 python-libs-2.6.6-29.el6_3.3.x86_64 python-libs-2.6.6-29.el6.x86_64 coreutils-libs-8.4-16.el6.x86_64 coreutils-libs-8.4-19.el6.x86_64 libudev-147-2.40.el6.x86_64 libudev-147-2.42.el6.x86_64 chkconfig-1.3.49.3-2.el6.x86_64 chkconfig-1.3.49.3-1.el6_2.x86_64 keyutils-libs-1.4-4.el6.x86_64 keyutils-libs-1.4-3.el6.x86_64 glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64 glibc-2.12-1.80.el6_3.5.x86_64 tzdata-2012c-3.el6.noarch tzdata-2012c-1.el6.noarch coreutils-8.4-19.el6.x86_64 coreutils-8.4-16.el6.x86_64 dbus-libs-1.2.24-7.el6_3.x86_64 dbus-libs-1.2.24-5.el6_1.x86_64 libxml2-2.7.6-4.el6_2.4.x86_64 libxml2-2.7.6-8.el6_3.3.x86_64 abrt-libs-2.0.8-6.el6.x86_64 abrt-libs-2.0.4-14.el6.centos.x86_64 expat-2.0.1-9.1.el6.x86_64 expat-2.0.1-11.el6_2.x86_64 python-2.6.6-29.el6.x86_64 python-2.6.6-29.el6_3.3.x86_64 gtk2-2.18.9-6.el6.centos.x86_64 gtk2-2.18.9-10.el6.x86_64 libcom_err-1.41.12-12.el6.x86_64 libcom_err-1.41.12-11.el6.x86_64 gawk-3.1.7-10.el6.x86_64 gawk-3.1.7-9.el6.x86_64 readline-6.0-4.el6.x86_64 readline-6.0-3.el6.x86_64 glibc-common-2.12-1.80.el6_3.5.x86_64 glibc-common-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64 libselinux-2.0.94-5.2.el6.x86_64 libselinux-2.0.94-5.3.el6.x86_64 cups-libs-1.4.2-48.el6_3.1.x86_64 cups-libs-1.4.2-44.el6_2.3.x86_64 nspr-4.9.1-2.el6_3.x86_64 nspr-4.8.9-3.el6_2.x86_64 cagefs-safebin-3.5-1.el6.cloudlinux.x86_64 cagefs-safebin-3.6-6.el6.cloudlinux.x86_64 libuuid-2.17.2-12.4.el6.x86_64 libuuid-2.17.2-12.7.el6.x86_64 xmlrpc-c-1.16.24-1209.1840.el6.x86_64 xmlrpc-c-1.16.24-1200.1840.el6_1.4.x86_64 openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.5.x86_64 openssl-1.0.0-25.el6_3.1.x86_64 dhcp-common-4.1.1-25.P1.el6_2.1.x86_64 dhcp-common-4.1.1-31.P1.el6_3.1.x86_64 krb5-libs-1.9-33.el6_3.3.x86_64 krb5-libs-1.9-22.el6_2.1.x86_64 nss-util-3.13.5-1.el6_3.x86_64 nss-util-3.13.1-3.el6_2.x86_64 cloudlinux-release-6-6.2.2.x86_64 cloudlinux-release-6-6.3.0.x86_64 e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.12-11.el6.x86_64 e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.12-12.el6.x86_64 glib2-2.22.5-6.el6.x86_64 glib2-2.22.5-7.el6.x86_64 UPDATE 2 I removed all the dupes and then did update and got this: Updating : sudo-1.7.4p5-13.el6_3.x86_64 79/361 Error in POSTIN scriptlet in rpm package sudo-1.7.4p5-13.el6_3.x86_64 warning: /etc/sudoers created as /etc/sudoers.rpmnew error: error creating temporary file /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.hjTOqJ: Invalid argument error: Couldn't create temporary file for %post(sudo-1.7.4p5-13.el6_3.x86_64): Invalid argument Updating : pcre-7.8-6.el6.x86_64 80/361 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/rpmtrans.py", line 399, in callback self._instCloseFile( bytes, total, h ) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/rpmtrans.py", line 475, in _instCloseFile self.base.history.trans_data_pid_end(pid, state) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/history.py", line 858, in trans_data_pid_end """, ('TRUE', self._tid, pid, state)) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/sqlutils.py", line 168, in executeSQLQmark return cursor.execute(query, params) sqlite3.OperationalError: unable to open database file error: python callback <bound method RPMTransaction.callback of <yum.rpmtrans.RPMTransaction instance at 0x5c7cfc8>> failed, aborting! - [~]# lsattr /var/tmp/ -------------e- /var/tmp/cache_5b07945563e03aec1c44917886fd99a6 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_6edfafda1a191f6986bd020ed945eea0 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_1b837feecdd4c9e6aa6ecd81d41fda75 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_70bec5f392b4f5f75ac444f5c82db2dc -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_24cd226ba0a370a6d3838a37745b2e15 -------------e- /var/tmp/nginx_proxy -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_19fb1dd060e42c9de8786ef34d7fcf6e -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_b4ac777076c5122a6e27d776de0a2fcb -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_5077441775ef8d07a2185e8fd48a4aa8 -------------e- /var/tmp/cache_4e71d930fe8250e222ae4d1dc39646ff -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_eb6eb29b38b55b85303c3137611f0a2faa15c21d -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_81e7e8d93b395f2c8d7e3fe12cc59e56 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_05c7f305bdbf9a4c7af251d33ac59766 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_0ad9369063a37b6b399688a835d69ed2 -------------e- /var/tmp/cache_c780deda617678faeea8f8a34395ac27 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_9773332e3c99ee18dca0b05e8f02a41e -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_1d9b02b068ea81a3975599ddc12bcfb1 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_1ffeff444123e924834dc5e80d07571e -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_aa56725471c84d9a06745c56dc499db7 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_51e19964d7e1a164c63f4c72fa43475c33debbc0 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_a83c7a05bb189a465b8813ff9e566aa8f9124079 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_2f506ba5b77c61107871e8cf80393cdb -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_7bfe1578605b259ec5e4fd2200df4cd0 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_f6e47011789d8d48d56dd78a398d98d5719414a7 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_b7c43a90a8b8d8f02b0fffca77796ce5 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_6c3e7103453ad4daba815bd96a903785 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_86f32a22507d8410b3f0fc7d71a135d5 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_aaf72d3e8cfb2f27ffdff61323f97e7553855a05 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_5de4488e2ee03ac0f99ab9494573ccb1 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_716d97bba4abdb38704a9e4212f6fddc -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_534908a9510a32eda13a5dc95ac022cc -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_626a58203d93427c79621ea4fec0906d -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_827ca92d10d3797f2c187c41764a7036 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_6282962d77f7bead20e785fbdb9a3d8f -------------e- /var/tmp/cache_b012c8a729fc54a296a700ed92930a0e -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_631e5ba769773da056108d3fbd143963 -------------e- /var/tmp/cache_30bb7f1333ba5f96a229c91a3385d8b5 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_93e085706b29c3e4e3593bfe39b1079e -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_abd78bd6c285d681c90de8c617747ab3 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_e144544ed925569018e6607b05f43f253f75e2aa -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_5d3d036c772847a4508d3e100b173d84 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_f35243d1f40bd8d9ce08940fafc00d93 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_761c3ffa811b959638ed0b266741eaa4 -------------e- /var/tmp/mm.sem.sNdxjf -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_006d45dbd807291f7bffbd1db3707ed6 -------------e- /var/tmp/cache_2d0162aac9f87c1978ac644923a5e2fe -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_22c534418c380b72d105935b59713dd1 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_94f72ef408567a15f6287c518e93898e -------------e- /var/tmp/cache_6fe03c83bb87489f3921db1c974dfc0e -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_48bbfa2a2a8793a62c7fd6a389a2763e -------------e- /var/tmp/mm.sem.ERERMV -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_20aba82c03a69b2dc6af66c499c38ee67e27368f -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_f94fe0589a79c934815ef359bcb0a16c7080d937 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_460390801eb004593b4dee83779f414e -------------e- /var/tmp/spamd-52811-init -------------e- /var/tmp/cache_6427fdb235d59b0b2fbd105bf23d2e87 -------------e- /var/tmp/cache_4ce12d8350d7c0361dc1bf15d552a2d8 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_039fec2a643340f118b6355e4c836ae8 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_fa46fa80b26e6cf3d9c7de942d5dbcff -------------e- /var/tmp/cache_664858e614367812148716536e22d030 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_4c8d4c44fbd828dc17415ce6aa213115 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_d231a6c0e5dd4d7bacbf9de3d8bb298f -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_a82f8a088a8e37d375f6a9fede4a54d2 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_604697227ae5359e5783dc9407845338 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_5b4e623536640abe671b40563d03817d -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_2aba0aff64f3c18f22e0b79d591259e2 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_bfd52a2d2d80880f8e26ad460739a0494f0d1e9e -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_ba9f3e3a7c7111930d6b801aaa833b46 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_5cc8c5b620015a465359359a0805fbdd -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_84945c41d604b4653a1bf45d83a1917c -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_5f52569b27430780c07d25cfb8177e5c1ef647f0 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_45896aef9e77f16be1b3e94b3edb2599 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_5a67d0ef8f826a2f103b429c8464bdd5f75d6218 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_1fce98bb32e5b34c79fd5a313de32980 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_f7ea772ff3fbb1eb2ad8712dd2c49ed8 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_a9dc16bc5c1eb2768bb2600f0d102fde -------------e- /var/tmp/mm.sem.3zwRTu -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_e2cad140703338a4b8c9254ec6b0a1a2 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_e7c8e85daf9c5424aecb83e066decf31 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_800f878fa944370f42e76057e7c033e19520bd41 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_4fdae64eb18599521ace18679795568b -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_958fb886b97de2e767b059376c4724b5 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_3c832a31f17744a8bb3c59dde02e561aefbc2e48 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_6d9d7bf04f34e0d82b101f882196a905 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_7231c75ae4fad2ca5fbcb6de430a7b13 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_2eadffa2285def9673ce784395d272d8 -------------e- /var/tmp/cache_2ff353b664d8028df967f807ac18593a -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_4138a267f1f5e3ad93c1d64547c63134ae7c0db3 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_64cd9fa0d6af8e8041aafffbe3db986a -------------e- /var/tmp/tmpg3ycIG -------------e- /var/tmp/cache_b633ac8283d6de8e39d81160d63fc8cd -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_2cee03cf5eafd3ef55d8efa1b0390436 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_608066c609e28621f2a29ac04a3a6441 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_46dfb35cf8266699ba9304e5d8c6869d -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_fb202a0ed54cee8832c5f6e0ca7fc1b3 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_8fe3c5fd8cdda02855e5f9b5a1ea85a4 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_941376d5cb51e0ba73f9a27ee259c159 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_4fa17b1eac1d18341d20d0d8d4991ceb -------------e- /var/tmp/cache_de647c956ca6a1b75744ad194aceaa82 -------------e- /var/tmp/mm.sem.Ugu7Be -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_656e8a50759d5b36b963e7eb85e0bb0d -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_983f77b607bbffa1748d6c49557381e9 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_632860d092e5e374da522ed2f88e83ce -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_030f900b81cc2a4ad095d53ef3ee0791 -------------e- /var/tmp/yum.log -------------e- /var/tmp/cache_810174993c6a2c0efe2edbe4c39a4a81 -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_29e2c781643434e81d189fc41f47fd34 -------------e- /var/tmp/tmpE12ahd -------------e- /var/tmp/sess_935da512fb077e04610266748b3b77f3 - cat /etc/fstab /tmp as: loop,rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54  | Next Page >