Search Results

Search found 10719 results on 429 pages for 'temp tables'.

Page 47/429 | < Previous Page | 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54  | Next Page >

  • How to do a join with ttwo tables ??

    - by bahamut100
    HI, I try to translate this query : SELECT * FROM `reunion` , lieu WHERE reunion.lieu_reunion = lieu.id_lieu to propel query : $c=new Criteria(); $c->addJoin(ReunionPeer::LIEU_REUNION,LieuPeer::ID_LIEU, Criteria::LEFT_JOIN); $this->reunions = ReunionPeer::doSelect($c); But in my template, when I made a print_r($reunions), the field "ville" (from the table 'lieu') is not present. Why ??

    Read the article

  • SQL Server (2008) Creating link tables with unique rows

    - by peteski22
    Hi guys, I'm having trouble getting in touch with SQL Server Managemen Studio 2008! I want to create a link-table that will link an Event to many Audiences (EventAudience). An example of the data that could be contained: EventId | AudienceId 4 1 5 1 4 2 However, I don't want this: EventId | AudienceId 4 1 4 1 I've been looking at relationships and constraints.. but no joy so far! As a sneaky second part to the question, I would like to set up the Audience table such that if a row is deleted from Audience, it will clear down the EventAudience link table in a cascading manner. As always, ANY help/advice appreciated! Thanks Pete

    Read the article

  • In MYSQL is it better to have one big table or many smaller tables

    - by user307922
    Hi All, I am making a database of my client's customers to send email promotions to. The database will include all about 12 of my clients and each of them has an average of 2100 customers. I was wondering if it would be better to have a table in the db for each one of my clients that contains a list of their customers or if I should just make one big table... The customers will be queried daily. I know it is a broad question but any advice would be appreciated. Cheers, Chuck

    Read the article

  • c++ tables of unions and structures

    - by newbDeveloper
    I was told to write a program, that creates a union and structure, then creates two-element arrays of unions and structures and fills their fields. I have created a union and a structure, but how to fill their fields in arrays ? #include <iostream> #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdio.h> using namespace std; union complex; union complex{ int i1; long double ld1; } u; struct Person { char* name; int age; bool sex; void show(){ printf("name %s, age %2.0d, sex %1d\n", name , age, sex); }; } person; int main(void) { Person *o = new Person[2]; complex *un = new complex[2]; un[0]->i1=i; system("pause"); return 0; } I've tried un[0]-i1=i; but it's not the proper way to do this.

    Read the article

  • Deleting rows from different tables

    - by Ross
    Here is what i'm trying to do: Delete the project from projects table and all the images associated with that project in the images table Lets say $del_id = 10 DELETE FROM projects, images WHERE projects.p_id = '$del_id' AND images.p_id = '$del_id' What is wrong with this query

    Read the article

  • django forms from two tables referencial integrity

    - by dana
    i have a class named cv,and a class named university, and each user that completes his cv, should choose a University he studyes at. My problem is: one student can study at one or 2 or three universities, or may be a user that is not student. I need to take this data into a form, and i use ModelForm. The data from the Cv class, and from the University class in the same form, and the user can add one or more universities, or no university. (in the same form) How should i do it? Should i use ModelForm? if i have a foreign key in the CV class, and the user is not a student (so he is at zero universities), i may get an referencial integrity error. thanks a lot

    Read the article

  • Tables in LaTeX

    - by rosalia
    When I try centering my table & getting a caption so that it reads something like "Table 1. This is the caption." the table appears at the top of the page no matter what I do. If I don't do the caption then I can get it in the part of the document that I want. How do I fix this problem? \begin{table} \caption{This is the caption.} \begin{center} \begin{tabular}{ | l | l | l | l |} \hline ... \hline \end{tabular} \end{center} \end{table}

    Read the article

  • ssrs 2008 programmatically add tables rows

    - by davethecoder
    Above is how my report looks, the part in yellow in hidden, and is only shown when the user clicks the + icon on the [name]. the result is basically the percentage difference from the Past [X] - [TERM] i.e there is a dropdown with, [weeks, months, days, hours] and a textbox of qty. so choosing qty = 4 and term = weeks will delivery a result set spread over 4 weeks based on the parent result sets date range and name ID I wish to populate here the number of rows, dependant on the value set by the user and the data will be from a dataset. Is it possible to dynamically add more sub rows ( like on row data bound ) if my first row is ID 123 [name], is it possible to send this value [123] to a dataset in order that all subrows are only relevant to the name with ID of 123? this is my first bash at SSRS so please no half cut answers, that just lead to more questions about the answer given :-) if this makes sense. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Referencing outer query's tables in a subquery

    - by soulmerge
    Is it possible to reference an outer query in a subquery with MySQL? I know there are some cases where this is possible: SELECT * FROM table t1 WHERE t1.date = ( SELECT MAX(date) FROM table t2 WHERE t2.id = t1.id)` ); But I'm wondering if something like this could work: SELECT u.username, c._postCount FROM User u INNER JOIN ( SELECT p.user, COUNT(*) AS _postCount FROM Posting p --# This is the reference I would need: WHERE p.user = u.id ) c ON c.user = u.id WHERE u.joinDate < '2009-10-10'; I know I could achieve the same using a GROUP BY or by pulling the outer WHERE clause into the sub-query, but I need this for automatic SQL generation and cannot use either alternative for various other reasons.

    Read the article

  • Two Different Types of Associatons on the Same Two Tables in Rails

    - by tmo256
    I have two models, users and themes, that I'm currently joining in a HABTM association in a themes_users table. Basically, after a user creates a new theme, it becomes available to other users to select for their own use. However, only the original creator of the theme should have the ability to edit it. So, I need to have some other kind of association to handle that relationship, something like an created_by_id field in the theme. In this way, the user model acts as two different roles: they can be an implementer of a theme AND/OR the owner of the theme. The implementer relationship is handled by the themes_users join table; the question is: What is the right way to handle this secondary association? Do I need to make users polymorphic and then make the created_by_id reference an "owner"? Or is there something easier? Thanks so much for your help!

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC4: How do I keep from having multiple identical results in my lookup tables

    - by sehummel
    I'm new to ASP.NET so this may be an easy question. I'm seeding my database with several rows of dummy data. Here is one of my rows: new Software { Title = "Microsoft Office", Version = "2012", SerialNumber = "12346231434543", Platform = "PC", Notes = "Macs really rock!", PurchaseDate = "2011-12-04", Suite = true, SubscriptionEndDate = null, SeatCount = 0, SoftwareTypes = new List<SoftwareType> { new SoftwareType { Type="Suite" }}, Locations = new List<Location> { new Location { LocationName = "Paradise" }}, Publishers = new List<SoftwarePublisher> { new SoftwarePublisher { Publisher = "Microsoft" }}} But when I do this, a new row is created for each location, with the LocationName being set in each row like this. We only have two locations. How do I get it to create a LocationID property for the Software class and in my Locations class. Here is my Location class: public class Location { public int Id { get; set; } [Required] [StringLength(20)] public string LocationName { get; set; } public virtual Software Software { get; set; } } I have this line in my Software class to reference this table: public virtual List<Location> Locations { get; set; } Again, what I want when I am done is a Locations table with two entries, and a LocationID field in my Software table. How do I do this?

    Read the article

  • designing database tables using JDBC

    - by Noona
    I am creating a users table using JDBC and mysql, each user has a permissions list that comprises Integer values, I am wondering if I should use an array for storing these values and then have only 1 record for this user in the table, or simply create a new table that comprises 2 columns: user ID and permissions, and then have multiple records for each user that specify the user name in one columns and one permission value in the second column, the second option seems to be redundant since a permission value is a simple object that isn't associated with any other objects (like a student and courses list for example, because the course is associated with many other objects, like grade, teacher, etc, so in this case it is natural to have multiple records), but the first one seems to be a bit unnatural to me, so if someone has experience with these things and direct me? thanks

    Read the article

  • Joining 3 tables - doing joins how to

    - by Kieran
    This is my current query - its not getting the required result. I want it do display all of the "resources" even if they dont have a connection. SELECT * FROM (`user_permissions`) JOIN `user_groups` ON `user_groups`.`id` = `user_permissions`.`role` JOIN `user_resources` ON `user_resources`.`id` = `user_permissions`.`resource` WHERE `role` = '4' When I try left join or right join it still returns the same result. The result I get is: id | role | resource | name 5 | 4 | 2 | Changelog I want id | role | resource | name 5 | 4 | 2 | Changelog null | null | null | Resource2 null | null | null | Resource3 Is this possible?

    Read the article

  • Query for Joining Two Tables With Possible Multiple Mapping

    - by Dharmendra Mohapatra
    First_table srno wono Actual_Start_Date Actual_End_Date 1 31 2012-06-02 2012-06-05 2 32 2012-06-05 2012-06-22 3 33 2012-06-11 2012-06-23 4 34 2012-06-23 2012-06-30 5 A-2 2012-06-24 2012-06-25 6 BU 2012-06-24 2012-06-26 7 40 2012-06-25 2012-06-27 second_table srno wono Base_start_date Base_end_date uploadhistoryid 1 31 2012-06-05 2012-06-05 1 2 32 2012-06-11 2012-06-12 2 3 32 2012-06-15 2012-06-17 3 4 32 2012-06-18 2012-06-20 4 5 33 2012-06-22 2012-06-25 5 5 33 2012-06-23 2012-06-25 5 Result Required SET ANSI_NULLS ON GO SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON GO ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[Reports_Subanalysis] ( @WONo VARCHAR(20) ) AS BEGIN SELECT 'SAT' AS stage, s.Base_start_date AS start_date, s.Base_end_date AS end_date, f.Actual_Start_Date AS Actual_Start_Date, f.Actual_end_Date AS Actual_End_Date FROM First_table f, second_table B WHERE A.wOno=B.nOno AND f.uploadhistoryid in (SELECT min(uploadhistoryid) FROM second_table C WHERE f.wono = C.wono) AND b.wono=@WONo END when I pass '32' Result stage start_date end_date Actual_Start_Date Actual_End_Date SAT 2012-06-11 2012-06-12 2012-06-05 2012-06-05 how Can I get the result like this when I pass non matching value like 'BU' stage start_date end_date Actual_Start_Date Actual_End_Date SAT NULL NULL 2012-06-24 2012-06-26 What modification do I need in my routine?

    Read the article

  • Between-request Garbage Collection using Passenger

    - by raphaelcm
    We're using Rails 3.0.7 and REE 1.8.7. Long-term, we will be upgrading, but at the moment it's not feasible. Following the advice of several blog posts, we've been tuning our GC, and have settings that work pretty well. But we would really like to run GC outside of the request-response cycle. I've tried patching Passenger per this post, and using the code supplied in this SO question. In both cases, GC does indeed happen between requests. However, every time the between-request GC happens, I see a bunch of this: MONGODB [INFO] Connecting... MONGODB admin['$cmd'].find({:ismaster=>1}).limit(-1) MONGODB admin['$cmd'].find({:ismaster=>1}).limit(-1) MONGODB admin['$cmd'].find({:ismaster=>1}).limit(-1) Starting the New Relic Agent. Installed New Relic Browser Monitoring middleware SQL (0.0ms) SHOW TABLES SQL (0.0ms) SHOW TABLES RefinerySetting Load (0.0ms) SELECT `refinery_settings`.* FROM `refinery_settings` WHERE `refinery_settings`.`scoping` = 'pages' AND `refinery_settings`.`name` = 'use_marketable_urls' LIMIT 1 SQL (0.0ms) BEGIN RefinerySetting Load (0.0ms) SELECT `refinery_settings`.* FROM `refinery_settings` WHERE `refinery_settings`.`id` = 1 LIMIT 1 AREL (0.0ms) UPDATE `refinery_settings` SET `value` = '--- \"false\"\n', `callback_proc_as_string` = NULL WHERE `refinery_settings`.`id` = 1 SQL (0.0ms) SHOW TABLES RefinerySetting Load (0.0ms) SELECT `refinery_settings`.* FROM `refinery_settings` SQL (0.0ms) COMMIT SQL (0.0ms) SHOW TABLES RefinerySetting Load (4.0ms) SELECT `refinery_settings`.* FROM `refinery_settings` WHERE `refinery_settings`.`scoping` IS NULL AND `refinery_settings`.`name` = 'user_image_sizes' LIMIT 1 SQL (0.0ms) BEGIN RefinerySetting Load (0.0ms) SELECT `refinery_settings`.* FROM `refinery_settings` WHERE `refinery_settings`.`id` = 17 LIMIT 1 AREL (0.0ms) UPDATE `refinery_settings` SET `value` = '--- \n:small: 120x120>\n:medium: 280x280>\n:large: 580x580>\n', `callback_proc_as_string` = NULL WHERE `refinery_settings`.`id` = 17 SQL (0.0ms) SHOW TABLES RefinerySetting Load (0.0ms) SELECT `refinery_settings`.* FROM `refinery_settings` SQL (0.0ms) COMMIT ******** Engine Extend: app/helpers/blog_posts_helper SQL (0.0ms) SHOW TABLES SQL (0.0ms) SHOW TABLES SQL (0.0ms) SHOW TABLES SQL (4.0ms) SHOW TABLES SQL (0.0ms) SHOW TABLES SQL (0.0ms) SHOW TABLES SQL (0.0ms) SHOW TABLES ******** Engine Extend: app/models/user SQL (0.0ms) describe `roles_users` SQL (0.0ms) SHOW TABLES SQL (0.0ms) SHOW TABLES SQL (4.0ms) describe `roles_users` SQL (0.0ms) SHOW TABLES SQL (4.0ms) SHOW TABLES SQL (0.0ms) SHOW TABLES SQL (0.0ms) SHOW TABLES (etc, etc, etc) Which is what happens when rails "loads the world" when the app starts up. Basically, GC.start is re-loading the app for some reason. Because of this, between-request GC is much slower than inline GC. Is there a way around this? I would love to have snappy, between-request GC if possible. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • TSQL - compare tables

    - by Rya
    I want to create a stored procedure that compares the results of two queries. If the results of the 2nd table can be found in the first, print 'YES', otherwise, print 'No'. Table 1: SELECT dbo.Roles.RoleName, dbo.UserRoles.RoleID FROM dbo.Roles LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.UserRoles ON dbo.Roles.RoleID = dbo.UserRoles.RoleID WHERE (dbo.Roles.PortalID = 0) AND (dbo.UserRoles.UserID = 2) Table 2: Declare @RowData as nvarchar(2000) Set @RowData = ( SELECT EditPermissions FROM vw_XMP_DMS_Documents where DocumentID = 2) Select Data from dbo.split(@RowData, ',') For example. Table 1: John Jack James Table 2: John Sally Jane Print 'YES' Is this possible??? Thank you all very much. -R

    Read the article

  • [c++] How to create a std::ofstream to a temp file?

    - by dehmann
    Okay, mkstemp is the preferred way to create a temp file in POSIX. But it opens the file and returns an int, which is a file descriptor. From that I can only create a FILE*, but not an std::ofstream, which I would prefer in C++. (Apparently, on AIX and some other systems, you can create an std::ofstream from a file descriptor, but my compiler complains when I try that.) I know I could get a temp file name with tmpnam and then open my own ofstream with it, but that's apparently unsafe due to race conditions, and results in a compiler warning (g++ v3.4. on Linux): warning: the use of `tmpnam' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp' So, is there any portable way to create an std::ofstream to a temp file?

    Read the article

  • dymanic columns in mysql tables?

    - by fayer
    i want to add dynamic columns in a mysql table. but i dont know exactly how. i want to let the user add some columns (fields) in a thread. eg. let him add a integer field and a value (eg. price: 199) or a string field and a value (eg. name: teddybear). the user can add as many field/value-pairs as he wants. i thought i could create a many-to-many table: thread <- thread_field <- field thread: id, title thread_field: field_id, thread_id, value field: id, name is this a good structure? but in this way i have to set a specific column type of thread_field.value. either its an integer or a string. i want to have the possibility to have it dymanic, let the user choose. how can i do this? thanks!

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to use bindModel to bind 3 different nested tables in CakePHP

    - by paullb
    I have a segment which can have many comments and each comment can have many tags. I can bind the comments to the segments using code like the below which is a function in the segment model class. function prepareForGettingSegmentsWithComments() { $this->bindModel( array('hasMany' => array( 'Comment' => array( 'className' => 'Comment', 'foreignKey' => 'segmentID' ) ) ) ); } However how can I bind in the Tags as well?

    Read the article

  • Custom Drupal Module not creating any tables

    - by Anthony
    Anything specific I need in the module file? Install File function module_install() { //lets create the school database $create_table_sql = "CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `table1` ( id int(11) NOT NULL, principal_name varchar(300) NOT NULL, school_name varchar(300) NOT NULL, address1 varchar(300) NOT NULL, address2 varchar(300) NOT NULL, city varchar(300) NOT NULL, computer_serial_no varchar(300) NOT NULL, state varchar(200) NOT NULL, uid int(200) NOT NULL ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1"; db_query($create_table_sql); //lets create the student database $create_table_sql = "CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS table2 ( id int(11) NOT NULL, principal_name varchar(300) NOT NULL, school_name varchar(300) NOT NULL, address1 varchar(300) NOT NULL, address2 varchar(300) NOT NULL, city varchar(300) NOT NULL, computer_serial_no varchar(300) NOT NULL, state varchar(200) NOT NULL, uid int(200) NOT NULL ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1"; db_query($create_table_sql); } /** * _UNINSTALL hook * * This function is run to uninstall the module. * */ function module_uninstall() { // Delete the DB db_query("drop table table1"); db_query("drop table table2"); } Info File Just in Case ; $Id$ name = My Module description = This module deals with blah blah package = Somepackage core = 6.x version = "6.x-1.0" core = "6.x"

    Read the article

  • Field contains foreign IDs for different tables

    - by Rich
    I am developing a php/mysql driven facebook game. I am stuck on an element the table design. When a user completes a task I want to trigger any number of events. I was thinking of something like so: tbl_events *event_id - serogate primary ID *task_id - foreign ID of the task just completed *event_type - what type of event e.g is it a facebook stream publish or a message to the user or does it unlock a new element of the game? *event_param - this is where it gets tricky... the event parameter is a problem for two reasons, 1) it will contain different foreign ids... dependent on the event_type and thus it will not be possible to join to x table. Meaning I would have to call two queries. 2) Most events require a single id or text, however some events require multiple parameters - like the facebook stream publish.

    Read the article

  • Firefox can not layout nested tables properly?

    - by ooplidi
    I want to implement a collapsible menu. I plan to use table component to simulate a menu, and nest a sub table into a table cell to simulate a sub menu. Below is my code, it works as expected in IE, Chrome and Safari, but it doesn't work well in Firefox: <html> <body> <div id="menu" style="position:absolute; left:150px; top:100px; z-index:1"> <table width="200px" height="90" border=1 cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tr> <td colspan=2>Money</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan=2>Tool</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Food <table style="position:absolute; left:200px; top:60px; z-index:1" width="200px" height="60px" border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tr> <td>Cookie</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Fruit <table style="position:absolute; left:200px; top:30px; z-index:1" width="200px" height="60px" border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tr> <td>Apple</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Banana</td> </tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table> </div> </body> </html> It seems that Firefox think the "left" and "top" attribute for the level 3 menu is relative to the level 1 menu, so it layout the level 3 menu incorrectly. Other browsers will calculate the offset base on the level 2 menu, that works as expected. Is it a bug in Firefox? If so how can I work around it? I want my code to have the same behavior in all major browsers.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54  | Next Page >