Search Results

Search found 1805 results on 73 pages for 'varchar'.

Page 47/73 | < Previous Page | 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54  | Next Page >

  • reclaim unsued space in sql 2008

    - by opensas
    I have a table with more than 300.000 records, that weights approximately 1.5 GB In that table I have three varchar(5000) fields, the rest are small fields I issue an update, setting those three fields to '' An after a shrink (database and files) the database uses almost the same space as before... DBCC SHRINKDATABASE(N'DataBase' ) DBCC SHRINKFILE (N'DataBase' , 1757) DBCC SHRINKFILE (N'DataBase_log' , 344) any idea?

    Read the article

  • use a variable for table name in mysql sproc

    - by Kyle
    I'm trying to pass a table name into my mysql stored procedure to use this sproc to select off of different tables but it's not working... this is what I"m trying: CREATE PROCEDURE `usp_SelectFromTables`( IN TableName varchar(100) ) BEGIN SELECT * FROM @TableName; END I've also tried it w/o the @ sign and that just tells me that TableName doesn't exist...which I know :)

    Read the article

  • inserting only date in a column in sql server

    - by sam
    hi! Is there a way to insert only date in a datetime column in sql server without the time? for example date (datetime) =============== 12-01-2000 16-02-2000 or i should store this as a varchar and cast it when retriving so that i can convert to whatever form i need.

    Read the article

  • Can MySQL reasonably perform queries on billions of rows?

    - by haxney
    I am planning on storing scans from a mass spectrometer in a MySQL database and would like to know whether storing and analyzing this amount of data is remotely feasible. I know performance varies wildly depending on the environment, but I'm looking for the rough order of magnitude: will queries take 5 days or 5 milliseconds? Input format Each input file contains a single run of the spectrometer; each run is comprised of a set of scans, and each scan has an ordered array of datapoints. There is a bit of metadata, but the majority of the file is comprised of arrays 32- or 64-bit ints or floats. Host system |----------------+-------------------------------| | OS | Windows 2008 64-bit | | MySQL version | 5.5.24 (x86_64) | | CPU | 2x Xeon E5420 (8 cores total) | | RAM | 8GB | | SSD filesystem | 500 GiB | | HDD RAID | 12 TiB | |----------------+-------------------------------| There are some other services running on the server using negligible processor time. File statistics |------------------+--------------| | number of files | ~16,000 | | total size | 1.3 TiB | | min size | 0 bytes | | max size | 12 GiB | | mean | 800 MiB | | median | 500 MiB | | total datapoints | ~200 billion | |------------------+--------------| The total number of datapoints is a very rough estimate. Proposed schema I'm planning on doing things "right" (i.e. normalizing the data like crazy) and so would have a runs table, a spectra table with a foreign key to runs, and a datapoints table with a foreign key to spectra. The 200 Billion datapoint question I am going to be analyzing across multiple spectra and possibly even multiple runs, resulting in queries which could touch millions of rows. Assuming I index everything properly (which is a topic for another question) and am not trying to shuffle hundreds of MiB across the network, is it remotely plausible for MySQL to handle this? UPDATE: additional info The scan data will be coming from files in the XML-based mzML format. The meat of this format is in the <binaryDataArrayList> elements where the data is stored. Each scan produces = 2 <binaryDataArray> elements which, taken together, form a 2-dimensional (or more) array of the form [[123.456, 234.567, ...], ...]. These data are write-once, so update performance and transaction safety are not concerns. My naïve plan for a database schema is: runs table | column name | type | |-------------+-------------| | id | PRIMARY KEY | | start_time | TIMESTAMP | | name | VARCHAR | |-------------+-------------| spectra table | column name | type | |----------------+-------------| | id | PRIMARY KEY | | name | VARCHAR | | index | INT | | spectrum_type | INT | | representation | INT | | run_id | FOREIGN KEY | |----------------+-------------| datapoints table | column name | type | |-------------+-------------| | id | PRIMARY KEY | | spectrum_id | FOREIGN KEY | | mz | DOUBLE | | num_counts | DOUBLE | | index | INT | |-------------+-------------| Is this reasonable?

    Read the article

  • Restrict update Column

    - by Kushan Hasithe Fernando
    Is it possible to restrict updating a column in SQL without using a trigger ? If so how ? (need the query) PS: I mean, I have a table CREATE TABLE MYBUDGET.tbl_Income ( [IncomeID] INT NOT NULL IDENTITY(1,1), [IncomeCatID] INT NOT NULL, [IncomeAmnt] MONEY NOT NULL, [IncomeCurrencyID] INT NOT NULL, [ExchangeRateID] INT NOT NULL, [IncomeAmnt_LKR] MONEY NOT NULL, [AddedOn] DATETIME NOT NULL, [Remark] VARCHAR(250), ) I need to allow users to update only [ExchangeRateID] and [IncomeAmnt_LKR] fields. All other fields can not be updated. only insert.

    Read the article

  • help with generating models from database for many to many in doctrine

    - by ajsie
    im using doctrine and i have set up some test tables to be generated into models: I want a many-to-many relationship models (3 tables converted into 3 models) (things are simplified to make the point clear) mysql tables: user: id INT // primary key name VARCHAR group: id INT // primary key name VARCHAR user_group: user_id INT // primary and foreign key to user.id group_id INT // primary and foreign key to group.id i thought that it would generate these models (from the documentation): // User.php class User extends Doctrine_Record { public function setTableDefinition() { $this->hasColumn('id'); $this->hasColumn('name); } public function setUp() { $this->hasMany('Group as Groups', array( 'refClass' => 'UserGroup', 'local' => 'user_id', 'foreign' => 'group_id' ) ); } } // Group.php class Group extends Doctrine_Record { public function setTableDefinition() { $this->hasColumn('id'); $this->hasColumn('name); } public function setUp() { $this->hasMany('User as Users', array( 'refClass' => 'UserGroup', 'local' => 'group_id', 'foreign' => 'user_id' ) ); } } // UserGroup.php class UserGroup extends Doctrine_Record { public function setTableDefinition() { $this->hasColumn('user_id') ); $this->hasColumn('group_id') ); } } but it generated this: // User.php abstract class BaseUser extends Doctrine_Record { public function setTableDefinition() { $this->hasColumn('id'); $this->hasColumn('name'); } public function setUp() { $this->hasMany('UserGroup', array( 'local' => 'id', 'foreign' => 'user_id')); } } // Group.php abstract class BaseGroup extends Doctrine_Record { public function setTableDefinition() { $this->hasColumn('id'); $this->hasColumn('name'); } public function setUp() { $this->hasMany('UserGroup', array( 'local' => 'id', 'foreign' => 'group_id')); } } // UserGroup.php abstract class BaseUserGroup extends Doctrine_Record { public function setTableDefinition() { $this->hasColumn('user_id'); $this->hasColumn('group_id'); } public function setUp() { $this->hasOne('User', array( 'local' => 'user_id', 'foreign' => 'id')); $this->hasOne('Group', array( 'local' => 'group_id', 'foreign' => 'id')); } } as you can see, there is no 'refClass' in the 'User' and 'Group' models pointing to the 'UserGroup'. the 'UserGroup' table in this case is just another table from Doctrine's perspective not a reference table. I've checked my table definitions in mysql. They are correct. user_group has 2 columns (primary keys and foreign keys), each one pointing to the primary key in either User or Group. But i want the standard many-to-many relationship models in Doctrine models. I'd appreciate some help. I have struggled to figure it out for a half day now. What is wrong? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • mySQL: Order by field size/length

    - by Sadi
    Here is a table structure (e.g. test): __________________________________________ | Field Name | Data Type | |________________|_________________________| | id | BIGINT (20) | |________________|_________________________| | title | varchar(25) | |________________|_________________________| | description | text | |________________|_________________________| A query like: SELECT * FROM TEST ORDER BY description; But I would like to order by the field size/length of the field description. The field type will be TEXT or BLOB.

    Read the article

  • MySQL counting question

    - by gew
    How do I find out which user entered the most articles and then count how many articles that user entered using PHP & MySQL. Here is my MySQL tables. CREATE TABLE users_articles ( id INT UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, user_id INT UNSIGNED NOT NULL, title TEXT NOT NULL, acontent LONGTEXT NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (id) ); CREATE TABLE users ( user_id INT UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, username VARCHAR(255) DEFAULT NULL, pass CHAR(40) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (user_id) );

    Read the article

  • SQL datetime LIKE select - why do I need an extra %?

    - by tomsullivan1989
    Can someone explain to me why when I perform a LIKE select in SQL (T-SQL) on a varchar column I can do the following: SELECT * FROM Table WHERE Name LIKE 'Th%' to get names beginning with Th, but when I do the same on a datetime column I need a % before the year, like: SELECT * FROM Table WHERE Date LIKE '%2013%' to get dates in 2013. The datetimes are stored in yyyy-MM-dd hh:mm:ss format. I know I could use a DATEPART style query but I was just interested in why I need the extra % here.

    Read the article

  • MySQL DATE_FORMAT comparison to CURDATE() query...

    - by Crazy Serb
    Hey guys, I am just trying to pull all the records from my database who have a rec_date (varchar) stored as m/d/Y and are expired (as in, less than curdate()), and this call isn't giving me what I want: SELECT member_id, status, DATE_FORMAT(STR_TO_DATE(rec_date, '%m/%d/%Y'), '%Y-%m-%d') AS rec FROM members WHERE rec_date CURDATE() AND status = '1' I'm obviously doing something wrong, so can you help? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • output parameter into label

    - by MyHeadHurts
    instead of returning my output paremeter value in my stored procedure to my label it returns the default value i set my output parameter to. why cant i put my output parameter into my text label Dim reader As SqlDataReader cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("@tour", "2365") cmd.Parameters.Add("@tourname", SqlDbType.VarChar) cmd.Parameters("@tourname").Direction = ParameterDirection.Output cmd.CommandText = "test" cmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure cmd.Connection = conn conn.Open() reader = cmd.ExecuteReader() Dim myTable As DataTable = New DataTable() myTable.Load(reader) DropDownList1.DataSource = myTable DropDownList1.DataTextField = "ddate7" DropDownList1.DataBind() Label1.Text = cmd.Parameters("@tourname").ToString conn.Close()

    Read the article

  • In NHibernate (Fluent), How do you map a property on referenced object into parent object?

    - by JChristian
    I want to map the Name column from the Child table into the Parent object. How do you do this (using Fluent NHibernate)? public class Parent { public int Key { get; set; } public string ChildName { get; set; } } Tables +--------------+ +------------------+ | Parent | | Child | +--------------+ +------------------+ | Key INT | +--->| Key INT | | ChildKey INT |-----+ | Name VARCHAR(20) | +--------------+ +------------------+

    Read the article

  • Query performs poorly unless a temp table is used

    - by Paul McLoughlin
    The following query takes about 1 minute to run, and has the following IO statistics: SELECT T.RGN, T.CD, T.FUND_CD, T.TRDT, SUM(T2.UNITS) AS TotalUnits FROM dbo.TRANS AS T JOIN dbo.TRANS AS T2 ON T2.RGN=T.RGN AND T2.CD=T.CD AND T2.FUND_CD=T.FUND_CD AND T2.TRDT<=T.TRDT JOIN TASK_REQUESTS AS T3 ON T3.CD=T.CD AND T3.RGN=T.RGN AND T3.TASK = 'UPDATE_MEM_BAL' GROUP BY T.RGN, T.CD, T.FUND_CD, T.TRDT (4447 row(s) affected) Table 'TRANSACTIONS'. Scan count 5977, logical reads 7527408, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0. Table 'TASK_REQUESTS'. Scan count 1, logical reads 11, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0. SQL Server Execution Times: CPU time = 58157 ms, elapsed time = 61437 ms. If I instead introduce a temporary table then the query returns quickly and performs less logical reads: CREATE TABLE #MyTable(RGN VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL, CD VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY([RGN],[CD])); INSERT INTO #MyTable(RGN, CD) SELECT RGN, CD FROM TASK_REQUESTS WHERE TASK='UPDATE_MEM_BAL'; SELECT T.RGN, T.CD, T.FUND_CD, T.TRDT, SUM(T2.UNITS) AS TotalUnits FROM dbo.TRANS AS T JOIN dbo.TRANS AS T2 ON T2.RGN=T.RGN AND T2.CD=T.CD AND T2.FUND_CD=T.FUND_CD AND T2.TRDT<=T.TRDT JOIN #MyTable AS T3 ON T3.CD=T.CD AND T3.RGN=T.RGN GROUP BY T.RGN, T.CD, T.FUND_CD, T.TRDT (4447 row(s) affected) Table 'Worktable'. Scan count 5974, logical reads 382339, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0. Table 'TRANSACTIONS'. Scan count 4, logical reads 4547, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0. Table '#MyTable________________________________________________________________000000000013'. Scan count 1, logical reads 2, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0. SQL Server Execution Times: CPU time = 1420 ms, elapsed time = 1515 ms. The interesting thing for me is that the TASK_REQUEST table is a small table (3 rows at present) and statistics are up to date on the table. Any idea why such different execution plans and execution times would be occuring? And ideally how to change things so that I don't need to use the temp table to get decent performance? The only real difference in the execution plans is that the temp table version introduces an index spool (eager spool) operation.

    Read the article

  • VB.NET SqlException Was Unhandled

    - by Daniel
    I am trying some SQL code but I get an error when I try this code. Main.database.ExecuteCommand("UPDATE Contacts SET first_name='" + c.first_name + _ "', middle='" + c.middle + _ "', last_name='" + c.last_name + _ "', age='" + c.age + _ "', mobile_phone='" + c.mobile_phone + _ "', home_phone='" + c.home_phone + _ "', work_phone='" + c.work_phone + _ "', home_street='" + c.home_street + _ "', home_city='" + c.home_city + _ "', home_state='" + c.home_state + _ "', home_zip='" + c.home_zip + _ "', work_street='" + c.work_street + _ "', work_city='" + c.work_city + _ "', work_state='" + c.work_state + _ "', work_zip='" + c.work_zip + _ "', home_www='" + c.home_www + _ "', work_www='" + c.work_www + _ "', home_email='" + c.home_email + _ "', work_email='" + c.work_email + _ "' WHERE first_name='" + c.first_name + _ "' AND last_name='" + c.last_name + "'") I get the following error Sql Exception was unhandled The data types text and varchar are incompatible in the equal to operator.

    Read the article

  • Regular Expression to parse SQL Structure

    - by user351429
    I am trying to parse the MySQL data types returned by "DESCRIBE [TABLE]". It returns strings like: int(11) float varchar(200) int(11) unsigned float(6,2) I've tried to do the job using regular expressions but it's not working. PHP CODE: $string = "int(11) numeric"; $regex = '/(\w+)\s*(\w+)/'; var_dump( preg_split($regex, $string) );

    Read the article

  • MySQL get variable from SELECT

    - by rlb.usa
    MySQL keeps saying my syntax is incorrect. I want to do this: DELIMITER $$ DROP PROCEDURE IF EXISTS `myprocedure` $$ CREATE DEFINER=`db`@`%` PROCEDURE `myprocedure`( var_name varchar(10) ) BEGIN /* syntax errors below */ DECLARE countTemp integer; SET countTemp=(SELECT COUNT(Name) FROM mytable WHERE Name= var_name); /* more stuff */ END $$ DELIMITER ; What's the correct syntax?

    Read the article

  • How to Limit Text Characters in PHP?

    - by hateMe
    I was wondering how can I limit a users input like HTML maxlength attribute but with PHP, example would be nice? Is MySQL varchar(255) one way to limit a users character input? What are the cons of just counting on MySQL to do this?

    Read the article

  • hibernate annotation- extending base class - values are not being set - strange error

    - by gt_ebuddy
    I was following Hibernate: Use a Base Class to Map Common Fields and openjpa inheritance tutorial to put common columns like ID, lastModifiedDate etc in base table. My annotated mappings are as follow : BaseTable : @MappedSuperclass public abstract class BaseTable { @Id @GeneratedValue @Column(name = "id") private int id; @Column(name = "lastmodifieddate") private Date lastModifiedDate; ... Person table - @Entity @Table(name = "Person ") public class Person extends BaseTable implements Serializable{ ... Create statement generated : create table Person (id integer not null auto_increment, lastmodifieddate datetime, name varchar(255), primary key (id)) ; After I save a Person object to db, Person p = new Person(); p.setName("Test"); p.setLastModifiedDate(new Date()); .. getSession().save(p); I am setting the date field but, it is saving the record with generated ID and LastModifiedDate = null, and Name="Test". Insert Statement : insert into Person (lastmodifieddate, name) values (?, ?) binding parameter [1] as [TIMESTAMP] - <null> binding parameter [2] as [VARCHAR] - Test Read by ID query : When I do hibernate query (get By ID) as below, It reads person by given ID. Criteria c = getSession().createCriteria(Person.class); c.add(Restrictions.eq("id", id)); Person person= c.list().get(0); //person has generated ID, LastModifiedDate is null select query select person0_.id as id8_, person0_.lastmodifieddate as lastmodi8_, person0_.name as person8_ from Person person0_ - Found [1] as column [id8_] - Found [null] as column [lastmodi8_] - Found [Test] as column [person8_] ReadAll query : //read all Query query = getSession().createQuery("from " + Person.class.getName()); List allPersons=query.list(); Corresponding SQL for read all select query select person0_.id as id8_, person0_.lastmodifieddate as lastmodi8_, person0_.name as person8_ from Person person0_ - Found [1] as column [id8_] - Found [null] as column [lastmodi8_] - Found [Test] as column [person8_] - Found [2] as column [id8_] - Found [null] as column [lastmodi8_] - Found [Test2] as column [person8_] But when I print out the list in console, its being more weird. it is selecting List of Person object with ID fields = all 0 (why all 0 ?) LastModifiedDate = null Name fields have valid values I don't know whats wrong here. Could you please look at it? FYI, My Hibernate-core version : 4.1.2, MySQL Connector version : 5.1.9 . In summary, There are two issues here Why I am getting All ID Fields =0 when using read all? Why the LastModifiedDate is not being inserted?

    Read the article

  • Help getting the following create table function to work with mysql and C#

    - by Matt
    string createTable = "CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS " + m_strDatabase + "_TimeLogs (logName VARCHAR(16), logTime INTEGER, logCountry TEXT, UNIQUE(logName)) TYPE=MyISAM;"; When this runs, no table is created. No errors either. Im using an ODBC connector. the variable passes in the db name, so that the table created would be users_TimeLogs if the database was called users for example. Am I doing something wrong?

    Read the article

  • How can I change column length using HQL query?

    - by gmugmu
    I tried session.createSQLQuery("ALTER TABLE People MODIFY address VARCHAR(1000);").executeUpdate(); but this throws org.hibernate.exception.SQLGrammarException: could not execute native bulk manipulation query After a lot of googling, the recommendation is to use HQL instead of SQL query to do bulk updates. Not sure how to use HQL to accomplish this. There seems to be no decent HQL documentation for updating column length in a table. Thanks so much for the help.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54  | Next Page >