Search Results

Search found 6523 results on 261 pages for 'route planning'.

Page 49/261 | < Previous Page | 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56  | Next Page >

  • trying to figure out how to bridge two virtual networks together and in turn bridge that to the internet for a virtual inline IDS/IPS system

    - by Tony robinson
    I'm trying to figure out how to bridge two vmware (server or workstation, workstation) or virtualbox networks together with a linux IDS/IPS system transparently inline between both the virtual networks. How do I accomplish this? I understand how to bridge to virtual networks together, but how to I make the linux virtual machine sit between them and force traffic to go across the transparent bridge? I would like to have something along the lines of: vmnet a various vms host-only network ---- inline linux box vmnet a boxes forced to go through here to get to the internet --- vmnet b network with internet access configured as either NAT or bridged -- internet I know that basically the linux box needs two virtual nics, one on vmnet a and vmnet b, but other than that, I don't know how to force all the traffic to go across the "transparent" bridging linux box on its way to the internet. Do vmnet a and b have to be the same ip network with the same default route? does vmnet a not have a default route and vmnet b have a default route? I've read in vmware forums that on the linux host you need to change permissions on the vmnet files for promiscuous mode? is this true? how do you configure this scenario on a windows box?

    Read the article

  • Cannot connect to windows server by name over vpn connection

    - by ErocM
    I have a rented dedicated windows server on a public ip that is acting as a SQL Server and VPN server. I need to connect to this server via computer name to get replication in place. I cannot use an ip address due to this issue: So, due to this, we are going the VPN route. That is my primary issue: After I am connected to this server's vpn, I can connect to SQL Server using the ip address but I cannot connect by the computer's name as you can see below... Right now, there is no hardware firewall on it since I had it removed to test this issue. I am running Windows 2008 Enterprise Server as the VPN server. I am not sure if the route print will help any from the workstation trying to connect but here is the info: IPv4 Route Table Active Routes: Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 21 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.0.0.2 276 Any other info needed? Thanks for the help! ========= CLARIFICATION ON A FEW THINGS #1 ========= This is the server's info: This is the workstation that is trying to connect: I connect to the server via "Control Panel\Network and Internet\Network and Sharing Center\Connect or Disconnect" You can see here that I am connected: ========= CLARIFICATION ON A FEW THINGS #2 ========= I've tried to connect directly to the Sql Server as I did above but with the computers name and I couldn't get to it. Here I am trying to net view it from the workstation and it couldn't find it:

    Read the article

  • Amazon EC2 Nat Instance - goes out but not back in

    - by nocode
    I've followed Amazon's steps and list what I've done. I've created 6 subnets (4 private SN1: 10.50.1.0/24, SN2: 10.50.2.0/24, SN3: 10.50.3.0/24, SN4: 10.50.4.0/24) and 2 public (SN5: 10.50.101.0/24 and SN6: 10.50.102.0/24) -I have a Bastion host and a NAT instance on SN5 and assigned EIP's to both. I created a test instance on SN1. edit: -NAT instance has source/destination check disabled -On the NAT instance, I had enabled the following commands to be bootstrapped: echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.0.0.0/16 -j MASQUERADE -In my VPC, the private subnets have their own route table and configured 0.0.0.0/0 to the NAT instance with 4 subnets being associated with the route table. I have a second route table for my public subnets and 0.0.0.0/16 is pointed towards the IGW (with the other 2 subnets associated with it). -For Security Groups, I have the NAT instance accepting all traffic on each of the 4 subnets and all OUTBOUND traffic is allowed. For my test server, I have allowed all outbound access and have allowed all traffic from the public subnet of the NAT host. I can ping internally with no issues. On my test instance, if I try to ping google.com, DNS resolves however I don't get a reply back. On my NAT instance, I run a tcpdump and can see the request being requested to google.com but it's not sending the reply back. My NAT host can ping and receive a reply from google. From the test host, when I ping the NAT instance, the tcpdump shows a request and receive. Is there something I'm missing? EDIT: I've figured it out - I had to save the iptable config and restart the service.

    Read the article

  • How to prevent asymmetric routing with multiple eBGP routers?

    - by Andy Shinn
    I have 2 routers announcing a /22 subnet to different providers (one providers connects to each of the 2 routers). I have split the /22 in two /23 to announce one /23 on each of the routers plus the /22 (the providers will take the more specific route). This allows me to fail over and keep traffic inside the /23 in and out the same provider. What are other ways in which I could announce just the /22 with both routers and have packets from servers on the network behind the routers go back out the same router in which they came in from? EDIT: The main problem I come across, which end users and clients complain about the most, is that the least hop route is sometimes not the "optimal" route. In my case, I know that Provider B may have better latency to X nation. But when packets come in from provider B, they may go out Provider A or provider B. The reverse is also true. If I send a packet to X nation out provider A, even though it may have more hops back, the packet will likely come in from Provider B (which may have higher latency, packet loss, etc. to this nation)

    Read the article

  • iptables firewall rules not allowing ssh from lan to DMZ

    - by ageis23
    Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination REJECT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:www reject-with tcp-reset REJECT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:telnet reject-with tcp-reset ACCEPT 0 -- anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED DROP udp -- anywhere anywhere udp dpt:route DROP udp -- anywhere anywhere udp dpt:route ACCEPT udp -- anywhere anywhere udp dpt:route logdrop icmp -- anywhere anywhere logdrop igmp -- anywhere anywhere ACCEPT udp -- anywhere anywhere udp dpt:5060 ACCEPT 0 -- anywhere anywhere state NEW logaccept 0 -- anywhere anywhere state NEW ACCEPT 0 -- anywhere anywhere ACCEPT 0 -- anywhere anywhere ACCEPT 0 -- anywhere anywhere logdrop 0 -- anywhere anywhere Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination REJECT 0 -- 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.2.0/24 reject-with icmp-port-unreachable ACCEPT tcp -- choister 192.168.2.142 tcp dpt:ssh state NEW REJECT 0 -- 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.3.0/24 reject-with icmp-port-unreachable ACCEPT gre -- 192.168.1.0/24 anywhere ACCEPT tcp -- 192.168.1.0/24 anywhere tcp dpt:1723 ACCEPT 0 -- anywhere anywhere ACCEPT 0 -- anywhere anywhere ACCEPT 0 -- anywhere anywhere ACCEPT 0 -- anywhere anywhere TCPMSS tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp flags:SYN,RST/SYN TCPMSS clamp to PMTU lan2wan 0 -- anywhere anywhere ACCEPT 0 -- anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED logaccept tcp -- anywhere choister tcp dpt:www TRIGGER 0 -- anywhere anywhere TRIGGER type:in match:0 relate:0 trigger_out 0 -- anywhere anywhere logaccept 0 -- anywhere anywhere state NEW logdrop 0 -- anywhere anywhere The ssh server I'm trying to connect to is in the DMZ(192.168.0.145). It's mainly used as a web server. I need access to it from my room 192.168.2.142. I don't get why ssh can't forward onto the 192.168.2.0 subnet? I'm sure it's the reject rule that causing this because it works without it.

    Read the article

  • Different external ip addresses from different sites

    - by user630286
    My router is ClearOS 6(Centos 6). In my router, I have two external (internet) network connections from two ISP's. The primary connection is eth2 connected to a cable modem and the second one is ppp0 connected to a dsl modem. I have assigned eth2 as the primary connection (with a high metric value). In fact this is done through clearos's multiwan web interface. I have a test in my Nagios to monitor whether the primary connection. This connection is done based on the result of curl ifconfig.me But it seems that ifconfig.me is always giving the ip address of my secondary connection. I tested it through a browser. Yes ifconfig.me gives the secondary internet's(ppp0) ip address. But whatismyipaddress.[com|org] give my primary ip address (eth2). I checked the default route on the router through ip route list 0/0 which also shows the primary connection (eth2) as the default route. The traceroute www.google.com and traceroute ifconfig.me both seems to trace through the primary connection (eth2). As our secondary internet connection has only got a limited download, I don't want to end up having to pay a large sum at the end of the month. Has somebody got an idea why the ifconfig.me shows my secondary address? What is the best way to ensure that my router(and thus the lan) use the right internet connection.

    Read the article

  • Vmware Workstation, Win7 host, Ubuntu guests with Nat + Host-only networks but they cannot connect to the Internet

    - by Ikon
    I have a Win7 host machine with Vmware Workstation. In the workstation I have 3 Ubuntu installed. All 3 Ubuntu guests have a Nat network - to access the internet without asking the router for a local address - and a Host-only network - to connect all Ubuntu quests and the host in a private network for internal communication, without touching the router. When I try to make any of the Ubuntu quests to get data from the internet - assuming that they would figure out that the Nat-ed interface can access the requested data - they fail and report that there is no route to my query. If I disconnect the 2nd interface on the Ubuntu guests with the Host-only network and restart networking, they start to know the route to the internet. Odd, during the installation of the guests they asked which of the 2 given interfaces - with Nat and Host-only config - should be used to get updates during installation and they oddly managed to get the updates. Not so after the installation has finished and rebooted. I have checked the Virtual Network Editor that the Nat interface should use my real network card to access the net, so there should be no problem. I wish not to use the router's dhcp service to give the Ubuntu quests an address, and also I don't want the guests to be accessable from the local network directly, but only by the host - that's the Host-only network is for. Any suggestions? Edit: 192.168.189.0 is the Nat interface and 192.168.7.0 is the Host-only. $ route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 192.168.189.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 192.168.189.2 0.0.0.0 UG 100 0 0 eth0

    Read the article

  • Remote network traffic not passing through VPN

    - by John Virgolino
    We have the following topology: LAN A LAN B LAN C 10.14.0.0/16 <-VPN-> 10.18.0.0/16 --- SONICWALL <-VPN-> M0N0WALL --- 10.32.0.0/16 Traffic between LAN A and LAN B works perfectly. Traffic between LAN C and LAN B works perfectly. Traffic between LAN A and LAN C, not so much. LAN A's gateway has a route to LAN C that points to the Sonicwall. The Sonicwall has a route to LAN A pointing to the VPN gateway connecting LAN B to LAN A. Tracing packets on the Sonicwall shows the LAN C destined traffic to arrive on the Sonicwall, but it does not forward the traffic, it dies there. Traffic from LAN B gets forwarded. Tracing packets on the Sonicwall while sending traffic from LAN C destined for LAN A shows nothing. This tells me that the M0N0WALL is not forwarding traffic for the 10.14.0.0 network and the Sonicwall is not forwarding from 10.14.0.0. The SA on the Sonicwall terminates on the WAN ZONE and is defined to use an address group that incorporates both the 10.14.0.0 and 10.18.0.0 networks. The M0N0WALL is configured for the 10.18.0.0 network and I have tried with both a static route to 10.14.0.0 and without on the M0N0WALL. I tried manually adding the 10.14.0.0 network to the SA on the M0N0WALL, but that really aggravated it and the SA never came up, so I reverted. I have checked all the firewall rules to make sure nothing is blocked. All of the Sonicwall auto-added rules look right. Specs: Sonicwall TZ200, Enhanced OS M0N0WALL v1.32 I'm at a loss at this point. Any help would be appreciated.

    Read the article

  • How to secure a group of Amazon EC2 instances

    - by ks78
    I have several Amazon EC2 instances running Ubuntu 10.04 and I've recently started using Amazon's Route 53 as my DNS. The purpose of doing that was to allow the instances to refer to each other by name rather than private IP (which can change). I've pointed my domain name (via GoDaddy) to Amazon's name servers, allowing me to access my EC2 webservers. However, I noticed I can now access the EC2 instances which I don't want to be public, such as the dedicated MySQL Server. I was thinking Amazon's Security Groups would still be in effect when using Route 53, but that doesn't seem to be the case. Before I started using Route 53, I was thinking of having one instance run a reverse proxy, which would help protect the web servers behind it. Then IP-restrict all the other instances. I know IP restricting can be done using the firewall within each instance, but should I ever need to access them from another IP address, I'd need a way in. Amazon's control panel made it a breeze to open a port when necessary. Does anyone have any suggestions for keeping EC2 instances secure, but also accessible to their administrator? Also, what's the best topology for a group of EC2 instances, consisting of web servers and a dedicated database server, from a security perspective? Does having a reverse proxy server even make sense?

    Read the article

  • Help with routing table

    - by user68752
    I have tried to find the answer to my question but not really found a clean and easy solution. I have a box (Ubuntu headless 10.04.1 server, with one Ethernet port) on LAN behind a router (running m0n0wall), that I have successfully installed a PPTP device (ppp0) on, this is working flawlessly (following this link) The thing is I want this box to route all it's internet traffic through the VPN tunnel (ppp0 device) but also being able to access the local LAN on 192.168.1.* subnet. I've succeeded a bit with this, but my problem right now is that I have port forwards (e.g. SSH) done in the m0n0wall pointing to this specific box which forces me to do "add routes" to all boxes that want to access this machine through this specific port. For instance a machine with ip xyz.xyz.xyz.xyz needs to have a static route setup in the routing table on the box to be able to access the box. This is the result of route -n xxx.xxx.137.2 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0 xxx.xxx.137.2 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 yyy.yyy.0.0 192.168.1.1 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 ppp0 Where xxx is the IPs provided from VPN server. yyy.yyy.0.0 is a net that i want to have access to the box, without this I can't access the box from outside the LAN (via port-forwards done in router software, m0n0wall) is there away round this ugly solution?

    Read the article

  • How to modify MapRoute (add new dir)

    - by LuRsT
    How can I change my map route so I can have another dir, and not just the controllers and actions. What I want is to have another directory before the controller so that way I can separate controller per "module" routes.MapRoute( "Default", // Route name "{module}/{controller}/{action}/{id}", // URL with params new { module = "module", controller = "controller", action = "Index", id = ""} This is what I want, but the code doesn't work. What more do I need to change to change the MapRoute?

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC Html.RouteLink

    - by gilbertc
    I am trying to understand what this RouteLink does. Say, in my Global.asax, I have the default route for MVC routes.MapRoute( "Default", // Route name "{controller}/{action}/{id}", // URL with parameters new { controller = "Home", action = "Index", id = "" } // Parameter defaults ); and on a View page, I do <%=Html.RouteLink("Dinners", "Default", new { controller="Dinners", action="Details", id="1"} %> Why it does not generate the link /Dinners/Details/1 but thrown an exception? Thanks. Gil.

    Read the article

  • Fatal Exception : AsyncTask #1

    - by Nadirah Ibtisam
    help help..huu Im having a problem here..seems there was no error in codes..but when I run it...and click button to view map consist routing the map..It appers to be close all of sudden..why is that? Please help me friends.. Im developing an app to read my current location and creating route to A position.. here are the codes: public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.map); onNewIntent(getIntent()); Drawable marker = getResources().getDrawable(R.drawable.marker); Drawable marked_places = getResources().getDrawable(R.drawable.feringgi_map); mymap = (MapView)findViewById(R.id.mymap); controller = mymap.getController(); // extract MapView from layout mymap.getController().setZoom(15); mymap.setBuiltInZoomControls(true); mymap.setSatellite(false); // create an overlay that shows our current location myLocationOverlay = new MyLocationOverlay(this, mymap); // add this overlay to the MapView and refresh it mymap.getOverlays().add(myLocationOverlay); mymap.postInvalidate(); myLocationOverlay.runOnFirstFix(new Runnable() { @Override public void run() { controller.setZoom(10); controller.animateTo(myLocationOverlay.getMyLocation()); } }); zoomToMyLocation(); switch(selecteditem) { case 0: switch(selectedsubitem){ case 0://Place A locationManager = (LocationManager) this.getSystemService(Context.LOCATION_SERVICE); locationManager.requestLocationUpdates(LocationManager.NETWORK_PROVIDER, 0, 0, this); Location location = locationManager.getLastKnownLocation(LocationManager.NETWORK_PROVIDER); if (location !=null) { loc=location; } GeoPoint destination = getPoint(3.144341, 101.69541800000002); new BackgroundTask(this, loc, destination).execute(); break; } } class BackgroundTask extends AsyncTask<Void, Void, Void> { private Location location; private GeoPoint dest; private Route route; private Activity activity; private ProgressDialog dialog; private RouteOverlay routeOverlay; public BackgroundTask(Activity activity, Location loc, GeoPoint dest) { location=loc; this.dest=dest; this.activity=activity; dialog = new ProgressDialog(activity); } @Override protected void onPreExecute() { dialog.setCancelable(false); dialog.setTitle("Loading..."); dialog.setMessage("Calculating Route..."); dialog.setButton("Cancel", new DialogInterface.OnClickListener() { public void onClick(final DialogInterface dialog, final int id) { cancel(true); MyMap.this.finish(); }}); dialog.show(); } protected Void doInBackground(Void... params) { if(isNetworkAvailable()) { if(haveInternet()) { try{ route = directions(new GeoPoint((int)(location.getLatitude()*1.0E6),(int)(location.getLongitude()*1.0E6)), dest); } catch (NullPointerException e){ } } else { return null; } } else { return null; } return null; } And this is the log cat (updated).. : 12-10 12:21:15.527: E/AndroidRuntime(10146): FATAL EXCEPTION: AsyncTask #1 12-10 12:21:15.527: E/AndroidRuntime(10146): java.lang.RuntimeException: An error occured while executing doInBackground() 12-10 12:21:15.527: E/AndroidRuntime(10146): at android.os.AsyncTask$3.done(AsyncTask.java:278) 12-10 12:21:15.527: E/AndroidRuntime(10146): at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerSetException(FutureTask.java:273) 12-10 12:21:15.527: E/AndroidRuntime(10146): at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.setException(FutureTask.java:124) 12-10 12:21:15.527: E/AndroidRuntime(10146): at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:307) 12-10 12:21:15.527: E/AndroidRuntime(10146): at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:137) 12-10 12:21:15.527: E/AndroidRuntime(10146): at android.os.AsyncTask$SerialExecutor$1.run(AsyncTask.java:208) 12-10 12:21:15.527: E/AndroidRuntime(10146): at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1076) 12-10 12:21:15.527: E/AndroidRuntime(10146): at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:569) 12-10 12:21:15.527: E/AndroidRuntime(10146): at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:856) 12-10 12:21:15.527: E/AndroidRuntime(10146): Caused by: java.lang.SecurityException: ConnectivityService: Neither user 10228 nor current process has android.permission.ACCESS_NETWORK_STATE. 12-10 12:21:15.527: E/AndroidRuntime(10146): at android.os.Parcel.readException(Parcel.java:1327) 12-10 12:21:15.527: E/AndroidRuntime(10146): at android.os.Parcel.readException(Parcel.java:1281) 12-10 12:21:15.527: E/AndroidRuntime(10146): at android.net.IConnectivityManager$Stub$Proxy.getActiveNetworkInfo(IConnectivityManager.java:728) 12-10 12:21:15.527: E/AndroidRuntime(10146): at android.net.ConnectivityManager.getActiveNetworkInfo(ConnectivityManager.java:378) 12-10 12:21:15.527: E/AndroidRuntime(10146): at com.madcatworld.testtesttest.MyMap$BackgroundTask.isNetworkAvailable(MyMap.java:488) 12-10 12:21:15.527: E/AndroidRuntime(10146): at com.madcatworld.testtesttest.MyMap$BackgroundTask.doInBackground(MyMap.java:411) 12-10 12:21:15.527: E/AndroidRuntime(10146): at com.madcatworld.testtesttest.MyMap$BackgroundTask.doInBackground(MyMap.java:1) 12-10 12:21:15.527: E/AndroidRuntime(10146): at android.os.AsyncTask$2.call(AsyncTask.java:264) 12-10 12:21:15.527: E/AndroidRuntime(10146): at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:305) 12-10 12:21:15.527: E/AndroidRuntime(10146): ... 5 more This is my manifest file: <manifest xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android" package="com.madcatworld.testtesttest" android:versionCode="1" android:versionName="1.0" > <uses-sdk android:minSdkVersion="8" android:targetSdkVersion="15" /> <uses-permission android:name="android.permission.ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION"/> <uses-permission android:name="android.permission.ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION"/> <uses-permission android:name="android.permission.INTERNET"/> <uses-permission android:name="android.permission.CALL_PHONE"/> <uses-permission android:name="android.permission.ACCESS_NETWORK_STATE"/> <application android:icon="@drawable/ic_launcher" android:label="@string/app_name" android:theme="@style/AppTheme" > <com.google.android.maps.MapView android:id="@+id/mymap" android:clickable="true" android:layout_width="fill_parent" android:layout_height="fill_parent" android:apiKey="XXXX" /> <activity android:theme="@style/StyledIndicators" android:name=".MainTest" android:label="@string/title_activity_main" android:screenOrientation="portrait"> <intent-filter> <action android:name="android.intent.action.MAIN" /> <category android:name="android.intent.category.LAUNCHER" /> </intent-filter> </activity> <uses-library android:name="com.google.android.maps"/> <activity android:name="A" android:screenOrientation="portrait"></activity> <activity android:name="B" android:screenOrientation="portrait"></activity> <activity android:name="C" android:screenOrientation="portrait"></activity> </application> </manifest> For your information, I already put ACCESS_NETWORK_STATE in my manifest.. Can u discover what cause the error? No error in code..but it failed to review my route map..:( Thanks Friends

    Read the article

  • Traceroute Theory

    - by Hamza Yerlikaya
    I am toying with trace route, my application send a ICMP echo request with a ttl of 0 every time i receive a time exceeded message i increment the ttl by one and resent the package, but what happens is I have 2 routers on my network i can trace the route through these router but third hop always ends up being one of the open dns servers same ip every time no matter where i traceroute to. AFAIK this is the correct traceroute implementation, can anyone tell me what i am doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC Routing Via Method Attributes

    - by TorgoGuy
    In the StackOverflow Podcast #54, Jeff mentions they register their URL routes in the StackOverflow codebase via an attribute above the method that handles the route. Sounds like a good concept (with the caveat that Phil Haack brought up regarding route priorities). Could someone provide some sample to to make this happen? Also, any "best practices" for using this style of routing?

    Read the article

  • Codeigniter Routes regex

    - by esryl
    want to route all underscored urls to the dashed equivalent. what would be the codeigniter route regex. url /controller-name/method-name-which-is-long/ would speak to /controller_name/method_name_which_is_long/ see: http://codeigniter.com/forums/viewreply/696690/ which gave me the idea to ask :)

    Read the article

  • Account for simple url rewriting in ASP.NET MVC redirect

    - by Kevin Montrose
    How would you go about redirecting in ASP.NET MVC to take into account some external URL rewriting rules. For example: What the user enters: http://www.example.com/app/route What ASP.NET MVC sees: /route What I want to redirect to: http://www.example.com/app/other_route What actually happens when I do a simple RedirectToAction: http://www.example.com/other_route (which doesn't exist, from the outside anyway) This seems like it should be simple, but I'm drawing a blank.

    Read the article

  • Symfony 1.4 require a domain name in routing

    - by Sunjalo
    I need to require a domain name in my symfony routing, my route looks like the following: domain_example: url: /routing/example/:domain_name param: { module: myModule, action: index, sf_format: json } requirements: { domain_name: '/^[a-z0-9]+([\-\.]{1}[a-z0-9]+)*\.[a-z]{2,5}$/' } I have also tried: requirements: { domain_name: '[/^[a-z0-9]+([\-\.]{1}[a-z0-9]+)*\.[a-z]{2,5}$/]' } If I call my route like so: mydomain.com/routing/example/otherdomain.com - I just get the module/action does not exist exception. Any advice appreciated - thanks everyone ^_^

    Read the article

  • Ruby on Rails wildcard routing such as /foo.htm /foo.php /foo.something

    - by fregas
    I'm trying to create a routing situation where by default, any URL's such as this: /foo /something /foo.php /somethingelse.xml /something.something.else etc. will all route to one controller, assuming they don't route anywhere else. i can get this to work with the following code in my routes: map.myroute '/:file_or_folder', :controller = 'mycontroller' this works fine as long as there are no dots in the URL: /something but this wont work: /something.foo any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Using the Google Maps API in a Android application.

    - by Tarmon
    Hey, I was looking at the Google Map API for the first time and I had a quick question. I am woking on an Android application and I was wondering if there is a good way to take a route that I have created using Google Maps (snapping to roads) and use the API display this route on an Android application? I see that there is a way to generate images overlayed with polylines created with coordinates but it seems like it would be tought to create a polyline for something like a curved road. Thanks, Rob

    Read the article

  • Rails Pretty URL with Decimals

    - by Kevin Sylvestre
    I have a rails application that allows searches using longitude and latitude. I have added a 'pretty' route with: map.connect 'stores/near/:longitude/:latitude', :controller => 'stores', :action => 'index' This works for integer latitude and longitude values (http://localhost:3000/stores/near/-88/49) but fails for decimal values (http://localhost:3000/stores/near/-88.341/49.123) giving: Routing Error No route matches "/stores/near/-88/49.0" with {:method=>:get} Any ideas how to use pretty URLs in rails with decimals?

    Read the article

  • How can I match a twitter username with angular ui router

    - by user3929999
    I need to be able to match a path like '/@someusername' with angular ui router but can't figure out the regex for it. What I have are routes like the following $stateProvider .state('home', {url:'/', templateUrl:'/template/path.html'}) .state('author', {url:'/{username:[regex-to-match-@username-here]}'}) .state('info', {url:'/:slug', templateUrl:'/template/path.html'}) .state('entry', {url:'/:type/:slug', templateUrl:'/template/path.html'}); I need a bit of regex for the 'author' route that will match @usernames. Currently, everything I try is caught by the 'entry' route.

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC AcceptVerbs and registering routes

    - by Pure.Krome
    Hi Folks, do I have to register the HttpVerb constraint in my route definition (when i'm registering routes) if i have decorated my action method with the [AcceptVerbs(..)] attribute already? eg. i have this. [AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)] public ActionResult Create(FormCollection formCollection) { .. } do i need to add this to the route that refers to this action, as a constraint?

    Read the article

  • ASP MVC - Getting Controller Level error handling

    - by RP
    How to get Controller-Level error handling: This is my map-route: routes.MapRoute( "Default", // Route name "{controller}/{action}/{id}", // URL with parameters new { controller = "Home", action = "Index", id = "" } // Parameter defaults ); And I have 2 controllers - HomeController and AwayController I want both both controllers to handle their own errors For example, a call to /Home/InvalidAction would be handled by one method and /Away/InvalidAction would be handled by another method Where InvalidAction currently results in a 404 as there's no Action method with that name

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56  | Next Page >