Search Results

Search found 842 results on 34 pages for 'andrea di persio'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 5/34 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • Why doesn't my ACR38 SmartCard Reader work?

    - by Andrea Grandi
    Hello, I've this SmartCard reader: Bus 002 Device 004: ID 072f:90cc Advanced Card Systems, Ltd ACR38 SmartCard Reader I've installed the following packages: pcscd, libacr38u, pcsc-tools, and a driver available on this website http://www.bit4id.com/italiano/download/download_file/Linux.zip the pcscd daemon seems running: andrea@centurion:~$ ps -e | grep pcsc 2799 ? 00:00:00 pcscd when I try to test if the smart card is working, I get no reply: andrea@centurion:~$ pcsc_scan PC/SC device scanner V 1.4.16 (c) 2001-2009, Ludovic Rousseau <[email protected]> Compiled with PC/SC lite version: 1.5.3 Scanning present readers... Waiting for the first reader... how can I fix this?

    Read the article

  • Getting Started with Prism (aka Composite Application Guidance for WPF and Silverlight)

    - by dotneteer
    Overview Prism is a framework from the Microsoft Patterns and Practice team that allow you to create WPF and Silverlight in a modular way. It is especially valuable for larger projects in which a large number of developers can develop in parallel. Prism achieves its goal by supplying several services: · Dependency Injection (DI) and Inversion of control (IoC): By using DI, Prism takes away the responsibility of instantiating and managing the life time of dependency objects from individual components to a container. Prism relies on containers to discover, manage and compose large number of objects. By varying the configuration, the container can also inject mock objects for unit testing. Out of the box, Prism supports Unity and MEF as container although it is possible to use other containers by subclassing the Bootstrapper class. · Modularity and Region: Prism supplies the framework to split application into modules from the application shell. Each module is a library project that contains both UI and code and is responsible to initialize itself when loaded by the shell. Each window can be further divided into regions. A region is a user control with associated model. · Model, view and view-model (MVVM) pattern: Prism promotes the user MVVM. The use of DI container makes it much easier to inject model into view. WPF already has excellent data binding and commanding mechanism. To be productive with Prism, it is important to understand WPF data binding and commanding well. · Event-aggregation: Prism promotes loosely coupled components. Prism discourages for components from different modules to communicate each other, thus leading to dependency. Instead, Prism supplies an event-aggregation mechanism that allows components to publish and subscribe events without knowing each other. Architecture In the following, I will go into a little more detail on the services provided by Prism. Bootstrapper In a typical WPF application, application start-up is controls by App.xaml and its code behind. The main window of the application is typically specified in the App.xaml file. In a Prism application, we start a bootstrapper in the App class and delegate the duty of main window to the bootstrapper. The bootstrapper will start a dependency-injection container so all future object instantiations are managed by the container. Out of box, Prism provides the UnityBootstrapper and MefUnityBootstrapper abstract classes. All application needs to either provide a concrete implementation of one of these bootstrappers, or alternatively, subclass the Bootstrapper class with another DI container. A concrete bootstrapper class must implement the CreateShell method. Its responsibility is to resolve and create the Shell object through the DI container to serve as the main window for the application. The other important method to override is ConfigureModuleCatalog. The bootstrapper can register modules for the application. In a more advance scenario, an application does not have to know all its modules at compile time. Modules can be discovered at run time. Readers to refer to one of the Open Modularity Quick Starts for more information. Modules Once modules are registered with or discovered by Prism, they are instantiated by the DI container and their Initialize method is called. The DI container can inject into a module a region registry that implements IRegionViewRegistry interface. The module, in its Initialize method, can then call RegisterViewWithRegion method of the registry to register its regions. Regions Regions, once registered, are managed by the RegionManager. The shell can then load regions either through the RegionManager.RegionName attached property or dynamically through code. When a view is created by the region manager, the DI container can inject view model and other services into the view. The view then has a reference to the view model through which it can interact with backend services. Service locator Although it is possible to inject services into dependent classes through a DI container, an alternative way is to use the ServiceLocator to retrieve a service on demard. Prism supplies a service locator implementation and it is possible to get an instance of the service by calling: ServiceLocator.Current.GetInstance<IServiceType>() Event aggregator Prism supplies an IEventAggregator interface and implementation that can be injected into any class that needs to communicate with each other in a loosely-coupled fashion. The event aggregator uses a publisher/subscriber model. A class can publishes an event by calling eventAggregator.GetEvent<EventType>().Publish(parameter) to raise an event. Other classes can subscribe the event by calling eventAggregator.GetEvent<EventType>().Subscribe(EventHandler, other options). Getting started The easiest way to get started with Prism is to go through the Prism Hands-On labs and look at the Hello World QuickStart. The Hello World QuickStart shows how bootstrapper, modules and region works. Next, I would recommend you to look at the Stock Trader Reference Implementation. It is a more in depth example that resemble we want to set up an application. Several other QuickStarts cover individual Prism services. Some scenarios, such as dynamic module discovery, are more advanced. Apart from the official prism document, you can get an overview by reading Glen Block’s MSDN Magazine article. I have found the best free training material is from the Boise Code Camp. To be effective with Prism, it is important to understands key concepts of WPF well first, such as the DependencyProperty system, data binding, resource, theme and ICommand. It is also important to know your DI container of choice well. I will try to explorer these subjects in depth in the future. Testimony Recently, I worked on a desktop WPF application using Prism. I had a wonderful experience with Prism. The Prism is flexible enough even in the presence of third party controls such as Telerik WPF controls. We have never encountered any significant obstacle.

    Read the article

  • Mega Trends 4 Financial Services, 21 maggio 2014

    - by Claudia Caramelli-Oracle
    Oracle ha sponsorizzato questo evento dedicato alle Banche e al mondo assicurativo. Il tema principale è stato cercare di capire come esplorare il futuro per migliorare il coinvolgimento dei clienti e le innovazioni in questo mercato. Oracle ha avuto l'opportunità di incontrare i Direttori Generali e i CxO delle più importanti banche italiane, internazionali e assicurazioni in oltre quattro momenti diversi: 1. Cena executive il 20 maggio2. Sessione plenaria3. Sessione parallela con il tema: Social & Digital Engaging4. CRM & Dig Data IntelligenceL'hashtag #mt4financialservices  ha visto un grosso movimento su Twitter: questo dimostra come le tematiche di cui si è discusso durante l'evento devono e trovano un reale riscontro in quello che è il mercato di riferimento. C'è interesse e soprattutto il mercato aspetta solo di essere ingaggiato in queste modalità! Per maggiori informazioni scrivi a Silvia Valgoi

    Read the article

  • Oracle Applications Day 2012 -Experience the Global Innovation of Management Applications

    - by antonella.buonagurio
    Il 10 ottobre a Milano e il 17 ottobre a Roma si sono svolti gli Oracle Applications Day, dedicati alla community di Clienti e Partner Oracle. Le due giornate hanno visto la partecipazione di più di 400 persone che hanno condiviso le loro esperienze e conoscenze in ambito applicativo. Durante la sessione plenaria sono state illustrate tutte le novità relative alle Oracle Applications ed in particolare le Oracle Fusion Applications mentre durante le 2 giornate più di 20 clienti hanno parlato di come utilizzano in modo strategico e con successo le soluzioni Oracle. 15 Business Partner grazie all'iniziativa "Partner Instant Workshop" hanno incontrato direttamente i clienti e discusso delle tematiche più calde del momento. Se non hai potuto partecipare all'evento oppure vuoi rivivere quei momenti qui sotto trovi la presentazione della plenaria mentre cliccando su ciascun titolo delle sessioni parallele puoi trovare le rispettive presentazioni. Innovation for Human Resources Performance Management Excellence Empower Applications with Technology (tenutasi solo a Milano) Applications for Public Sector (tenutasi solo a Roma) Next Generation Global Operations Customer Experience Revolution

    Read the article

  • Il PLM per l'industria Famaceutica

    - by Paolo Leveghi
    Di fronte ad una platea di rappresentanti dell'industria farmaceutica si è svolto Venerdi 9 Novembre a Roma un seminario dal titolo: "INNOVAZIONE TECNOLOGICA ED EFFICENZA OPERATIVA", che si poneva l'obiettivo di stimolare nei presenti la curiosità intorno ai temi del Project Management e del Product Lifecycle Management. Partendo dalla teoria, illustrata dal Prof. Corvaglia, ci si è poi addentrati nel pratico, con esempi e testimonianze di aziende italiane ed estere.Questi gli interventi: L'esperienza nella gestione di vita del prodotto  La nuova sfida del farmaco: rimanere “originali”  Paolo Prandini, Master Principal Sales Consultant, Oracle Italy Pharmaceutical Global Product Data ManagementJean-Pierre Merx | Sales Director Southern Europe, Oracle L'interazione è stata viva, testimoniata dalle tante domande sollevate durante gli interventi ed al proanzo che ha seguito i lavori. Se avete interesse a ricevere copia delle presentazioni, inviate una mail a paolo.leveghi-AT-oracle.com

    Read the article

  • Il CRM è al passo con i tempi?

    - by antonella.buonagurio(at)oracle.com
    Il Social Customer Relationship Management è nato grazie alla rivoluzione portata dal Web 2.0, un cambiamento epocale nelle modalità di comunicazione che ha aggiunto una incredibile ricchezza alle conversazioni tra aziende e consumatori. Le aziende dispongono adesso di strumenti per comprendere il proprio mercato senza precedenti, i consumatori, a loro volta, hanno il potere di utilizzare nuovi canali per esprimere le proprie esigenze e per comunicare e condividere commenti ed esperienze. Ma il Web 2.0 non è il solo fattore che impatta sulle scelte strategiche in ambito CRM  che ogni azienda deve considerare per sostenere  questo nuovo rapporto con i propri consumatori.    Vuoi scoprire quali sono le forze (o fattori) che le aziende devono considerare affinchè i processi di gestione della relazione con i clienti stiano al passo con le mutate condizioni sociali ed economiche?   Per saperne di più:   Il whitepaper realizzato da Oracle, Paul Gillin ed  IT Business Edge  ne delinea alcuni: 1.      Il Business. Come è cambiato in funzione dell'esperienza multicanale ora possible, della centralità del cliente e dei social networking che dominano le relazioni on line? 2.      La tecnologiaLe aziende oggi per guadagnare vantaggio competitivo devono dotarsi delle più innovative tecnologie per dare maggior valore al proprio business e per ridurre al minimo i costi di infrastruttura. Quali sono e quali sono gli effettivi vantaggi?   e altri ancora ...... leggendo il white paper "Is your CRM solution keeping up with the times?"

    Read the article

  • Sales & Marketing Summit 2012. Lo avete perso? Rimediamo subito.

    - by Silvia Valgoi
    Lo scorso 28 marzo si è svolto l'appuntamento dedicato alle aziende che vogliono  ripensare i processi di Vendita, Marketing e Supporto alla Clientela, facendo leva sui nuovi paradigmi quali Social Networking , Web 2.0, e-commerce, mobilità e multinacanalità, Cloud computing. Dello straordinario intervento del Prof. Enrico Finzi sul valore dell'Innovazione e sui 10 fattori di Leadership indispensabili per mantenere la prioria competività sul mercato, soprattutto nei periodi storici negativi, non abbiamo documentazione (è stato fatto a braccio) ma a presto pubblicheremo una sua intervista. Nella documentazione potete ritrovare i temi trattati durante gli speech in plenaria e le sessioni di approfondimento  Oracle Fusion CRM, la soluzione di nuova generazione per migliorare e incrementare l'efficacia dei processi di Vendita e Marketing. Oracle Sales & Marketing Summit - Fusion CRM View more presentations from Oracle Apps - Italia . I processi più innovativi di Customer Experience. Oracle Sales & Marketign Summit - Customer Experience View more presentations from Oracle Apps - Italia . Ask the Expert: e-commerce, Ask the Expert: knowledge management, Oracle Sales & Marketing Summit - Knowledge Management View more presentations from Oracle Apps - Italia . Ask the Expert:marketing & loyalty, Oracle Sales & Marketing Summit - Marketing & Loyalty View more presentations from Oracle Apps - Italia . Ask the Expert: Policy Automation  Ask the Expert: Fusion CRM Oracle Sales & Marketing Summit: Fusion CRM Demo View more presentations from Oracle Apps - Italia .

    Read the article

  • Contexts and Dependency Injection(CDI)??

    - by Masa Sasaki
    WebLogic Server?????????????WebLogic Server????????6?20?????????37?WebLogic Server???@????????Contexts and Dependency Injection(CDI)?(?????????? Fusion Middleware?????? ?? ?)?????????????????Java EE 6????????CDI???????DI(Dependency Injection)?Java EE 5????????????????????CDI??DI????????????????????????????????????????????????????????CDI????????????????????(?????? Fusion Middleware?????? ??? ??) CDI?? ???????CDI???Java EE 6???????JSR299: Contexts Dependency Injection????? ?????Dependency Injection (??????)?Aspect-Oriented Programming (AOP)?Interception ??????????????????????????? CDI?????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????CDI?????????????? CDI?????????????2? ??1???CDI??????????Oracle WebLogic Server 12c????Java EE 6????????? ?????????????????2???beans.xml???????Web??????????WEB-INF/beans.xml? EJB??META-INF/beans.xml????????????CDI????????????????beans.xml???? ?????????????????????? Java EE 5?DI(Dependency Injection) Java EE 5??DI????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????(@EJB? @Resource?@WebServiceRef)??? Java EE 6?CDI Java EE 6?CDI?????????????????@Inject???????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????? @Qualifier????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????@Qualifier? ????????????·??????????????????????@JPN??????????? @Produce???????? ???????????????????? ????????·?????????????? CDI?????????????????????????????????·??????? ????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????? EL(Expression Language) ???????? EL????????????JSF?ManagedBean?????????????·?????????????? ??? Java EE 6?????????CDI???????????Java EE 5?DI????AOP??? ???????????????????DI, AOP???????????????? ?????????????CDI?????????????????????????????? ?????CDI?????????????????????????????????? ?????? WebLogic Server??? WebLogic Server?????????WebLogic Server?????! WebLogic Server??????(???????????) WebLogic Server???????? WebLogic Server??????

    Read the article

  • How can I pass extra parameters to the routeMatch object?

    - by Marcos Garcia
    I'm trying to unit test a controller, but can't figure out how to pass some extra parameters to the routeMatch object. I followed the posts from tomoram at http://devblog.x2k.co.uk/unit-testing-a-zend-framework-2-controller/ and http://devblog.x2k.co.uk/getting-the-servicemanager-into-the-test-environment-and-dependency-injection/, but when I try to dispatch a request to /album/edit/1, for instance, it throws the following exception: Zend\Mvc\Exception\DomainException: Url plugin requires that controller event compose a router; none found Here is my PHPUnit Bootstrap: class Bootstrap { static $serviceManager; static $di; static public function go() { include 'init_autoloader.php'; $config = include 'config/application.config.php'; // append some testing configuration $config['module_listener_options']['config_static_paths'] = array(getcwd() . '/config/test.config.php'); // append some module-specific testing configuration if (file_exists(__DIR__ . '/config/test.config.php')) { $moduleConfig = include __DIR__ . '/config/test.config.php'; array_unshift($config['module_listener_options']['config_static_paths'], $moduleConfig); } $serviceManager = Application::init($config)->getServiceManager(); self::$serviceManager = $serviceManager; // Setup Di $di = new Di(); $di->instanceManager()->addTypePreference('Zend\ServiceManager\ServiceLocatorInterface', 'Zend\ServiceManager\ServiceManager'); $di->instanceManager()->addTypePreference('Zend\EventManager\EventManagerInterface', 'Zend\EventManager\EventManager'); $di->instanceManager()->addTypePreference('Zend\EventManager\SharedEventManagerInterface', 'Zend\EventManager\SharedEventManager'); self::$di = $di; } static public function getServiceManager() { return self::$serviceManager; } static public function getDi() { return self::$di; } } Bootstrap::go(); Basically, we are creating a Zend\Mvc\Application environment. My PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase is enclosed in a custom class, which goes like this: abstract class ControllerTestCase extends TestCase { /** * The ActionController we are testing * * @var Zend\Mvc\Controller\AbstractActionController */ protected $controller; /** * A request object * * @var Zend\Http\Request */ protected $request; /** * A response object * * @var Zend\Http\Response */ protected $response; /** * The matched route for the controller * * @var Zend\Mvc\Router\RouteMatch */ protected $routeMatch; /** * An MVC event to be assigned to the controller * * @var Zend\Mvc\MvcEvent */ protected $event; /** * The Controller fully qualified domain name, so each ControllerTestCase can create an instance * of the tested controller * * @var string */ protected $controllerFQDN; /** * The route to the controller, as defined in the configuration files * * @var string */ protected $controllerRoute; public function setup() { parent::setup(); $di = \Bootstrap::getDi(); // Create a Controller and set some properties $this->controller = $di->newInstance($this->controllerFQDN); $this->request = new Request(); $this->routeMatch = new RouteMatch(array('controller' => $this->controllerRoute)); $this->event = new MvcEvent(); $this->event->setRouteMatch($this->routeMatch); $this->controller->setEvent($this->event); $this->controller->setServiceLocator(\Bootstrap::getServiceManager()); } public function tearDown() { parent::tearDown(); unset($this->controller); unset($this->request); unset($this->routeMatch); unset($this->event); } } And we create a Controller instance and a Request with a RouteMatch. The code for the test: public function testEditActionWithGetRequest() { // Dispatch the edit action $this->routeMatch->setParam('action', 'edit'); $this->routeMatch->setParam('id', $album->id); $result = $this->controller->dispatch($this->request, $this->response); // rest of the code isn't executed } I'm not sure what I'm missing here. Can it be any configuration for the testing bootstrap? Or should I pass the parameters in some other way? Or am I forgetting to instantiate something?

    Read the article

  • Dependency injection: How to sell it

    - by Mel
    Let it be known that I am a big fan of dependency injection (DI) and automated testing. I could talk all day about it. Background Recently, our team just got this big project that is to built from scratch. It is a strategic application with complex business requirements. Of course, I wanted it to be nice and clean, which for me meant: maintainable and testable. So I wanted to use DI. Resistance The problem was in our team, DI is taboo. It has been brought up a few times, but the gods do not approve. But that did not discourage me. My Move This may sound weird but third-party libraries are usually not approved by our architect team (think: "thou shalt not speak of Unity, Ninject, NHibernate, Moq or NUnit, lest I cut your finger"). So instead of using an established DI container, I wrote an extremely simple container. It basically wired up all your dependencies on startup, injects any dependencies (constructor/property) and disposed any disposable objects at the end of the web request. It was extremely lightweight and just did what we needed. And then I asked them to review it. The Response Well, to make it short. I was met with heavy resistance. The main argument was, "We don't need to add this layer of complexity to an already complex project". Also, "It's not like we will be plugging in different implementations of components". And "We want to keep it simple, if possible just stuff everything into one assembly. DI is an uneeded complexity with no benefit". Finally, My Question How would you handle my situation? I am not good in presenting my ideas, and I would like to know how people would present their argument. Of course, I am assuming that like me, you prefer to use DI. If you don't agree, please do say why so I can see the other side of the coin. It would be really interesting to see the point of view of someone who disagrees. Update Thank you for everyone's answers. It really puts things into perspective. It's nice enough to have another set of eyes to give you feedback, fifteen is really awesome! This are really great answers and helped me see the issue from different sides, but I can only choose one answer, so I will just pick the top voted one. Thanks everyone for taking the time to answer. I have decided that it is probably not the best time to implement DI, and we are not ready for it. Instead, I will concentrate my efforts on making the design testable and attempt to present automated unit testing. I am aware that writing tests is additional overhead and if ever it is decided that the additional overhead is not worth it, personally I would still see it as a win situation since the design is still testable. And if ever testing or DI is a choice in future, the design can easily handle it.

    Read the article

  • Why do I need an IoC container as opposed to straightforward DI code?

    - by Vadim
    I've been using Dependency Injection (DI) for awhile, injecting either in a constructor, property, or method. I've never felt a need to use an Inversion of Control (IoC) container. However, the more I read, the more pressure I feel from the community to use an IoC container. I played with .NET containers like StructureMap, NInject, Unity, and Funq. I still fail to see how an IoC container is going to benefit / improve my code. I'm also afraid to start using a container at work because many of my co-workers will see code which they don't understand. Many of them may be reluctant to learn new technology. Please, convince me that I need to use an IoC container. I'm going to use these arguments when I talk to my fellow developers at work.

    Read the article

  • What is the business case for a dependency injection (DI) framework?

    - by kalkie
    At my company we want to start using a dependency injection (DI) framework for managing our dependencies. I have some difficulty with explaining the business value of such a framework. Currently I have come up with these reasons. Less source code, delete all the builder patterns in the code. Increase in flexibility. Easier to switch dependencies. Better separation of concern. The framework is responsible for creating instances instead of our code. Has anybody else had to persuade management? How did you do that? What reasons did you use?

    Read the article

  • Problem with command line in windows

    - by Hoang Pham
    I copy the cmd.exe to a new location, then I run it to get the current directory location at that folder. But just recently, there is always this message: Impossibile trovare il testo del messaggio per il numero di messaggio 0x2350 nel file di messaggio per Application. Impossibile trovare il testo del messaggio per il numero di messaggio 0x2334 nel file di messaggio per Application. C:\cygwin\home\Hoang> Someone know how to solve it?

    Read the article

  • Which single IoC/DI container would you recommend using and why?

    - by Rob G
    I'm asking this question because it's a good way to gauge how the community at large feels about the various containers/frameworks and why. Also, whilst my expertise may lie in .Net development, I am very interested in which frameworks are popular (and why) in other languages. If I feel the need to start digging into Java for instance, then I'd like to hit the ground running with good (comfortable) knowledge that I'm starting in the right direction. Does Ruby even need one with all its magnificent dynamicism? I have my own opinions on the .Net front, and will probably add my own personal favourite in an answer below, but I'm interested in all languages and opinions here. With all that in mind, could you please state only one IoC/DI framework that you use and recommend with the language of choice (Java/Ruby/.Net/Smalltalk etc.) and your reasoning for your choice, and if someone has already answered your particular flavour, then you can just vote it up and add comments to it so that anyone looking for advice in future and see which frameworks are more than likely to work for them once they read your reasoning. I'm hoping that over time, the best ones will bubble up to the top. I realise that this question doesn't have only one correct answer, so I won't be choosing one - the community will decide which framework gets the most votes and why. Of course, if you really feel strongly opposed to a particular brand, you could take the reputation hit and vote it down too, and this question can serve as a true wiki-style entry for research into this field. Remember, only one IoC per answer you write please - if you feel the need to promote two frameworks, then write two answers with your reasoning inside for each choice - then others in the community can agree or disagree with you.

    Read the article

  • Gestire la relazione con il fornitore: strategie, processi, strumenti

    - by antonella.buonagurio(at)oracle.com
    Si é svolto il 3 Marzo un interessante incontro sul tema delle relazioni fra fornitori ed ufficio acquisti. Cesare Businelli , Direttore Generale Italia dell' European Institute of Purchasing Management ha illustrato, in un tempo purtoppo inferiore al necessario, come gestire le relazioni e la collaborazione con i fornitori strategici per creare valore, portando numerosi esempi di successo e stimolando l'uditorio, composto dai responsabili acquisti di piu di 20 aziende. A seguire Lino Campofiorito - Procurement Solutions Sales Consultant di Oracle ha illustrato alcune delle soluzioni informatiche a supporto. Qui potrete trovare le slides. Al termine dell'incontro molte domande per i relatori a conferma dell'interesse del tema.  Oracle Procurement Channel View more presentations from antobng82.

    Read the article

  • Oracle Hyperion Customer Briefing 2011

    - by antonella.buonagurio(at)oracle.com
    Lo scorso 24 febbraio a Milano e il 9 marzo a Roma si è tenuto l'Oracle Hyperion Customer Briefing 2011 un workshop riservato ai clienti Oracle su tutte le novità Oracle Hyperion EPM SYstem 11.1.2. La giornata si è sviluppata attraverso un percorso guidato di quattro sessioni tematiche su  come poter migliorare ulteriormente processi di management nelle  aziende in tutti gli ambiti di interesse.  

    Read the article

  • Windows Embedded in Padua

    - by Valter Minute
    Martedì 8 Giugno, presso l’università di Padova terrò un intervento su Windows CE all’interno dell’evento: “Workshop sulle nuove architetture per sistemi embedded”. All’interno dello stesso evento altre sessioni tratteranno dell’architettura ARM e in particolare dei nuovi core Cortex A8, di applicazioni avanzate e di Linux Embedded. L’agenda (fitta e interessante) e il link per le iscrizioni potete trovarli qui: http://www.arrowitaly.it/training-events/training-events/dettaglio-training/article/workshop-sulle-nuove-architetture-per-sistemi-embedded/?tx_ttnews[backPid]=1336&cHash=ae34e269e1

    Read the article

  • Seminario "ABC - Activity Based Costing in Italia"

    - by claudiac.caramelli
    Martedì 5 novembre si è svolto un interessante seminario organizzato da Oracle in collaborazione con Assocontroller. Sono stati approfonditi temi riguardanti la metodologia ABC ed è stato discusso in modo oggettivo sulle problematiche, le esperienze e le evoluzioni di tale approccio. Il primo intervento, a cura di Giorgio Cinciripini (consulente e presidente di Assocontroller) ha aperto la strada alla presentazione del Prof. Alberto Bubbio, professore in economia aziendale presso l'Università Liuc. Sono stati successivamente presentati 3 case history (il caso Sandvik, Atac Patrimonio e Marazzi Group), che hanno permesso di approfondire e meglio spiegare come questa metodologia possa aiutare un'azienda a controllare i costi, per arrivare a gestirli in modo dinamico e finalizzato a seguire razionalmente l'andamento del mercato e del valore che il mercato attribuisce al prodotto o servizio che si desidera vendere. Una sala interessata e attenta agli interventi, responsi più che ottimi... Ci sono tutte le premesse per ripetere l'evento!

    Read the article

  • OCAD 2013, rassegna stampa&more

    - by claudiac.caramelli
    Vi segnaliamo un interessante articolo su ImpresaCity sull'Oracle Cloud Applications Day 2013: http://bit.ly/1eE3a5Q Roberto Bonino ci racconta come il Cloud si stia sempre di più diffondendo nelle aziende italiane e la visione degli esperti che sono intervenuti. E' stato anche aggiornato il canale youtube di Oracle Italia con due nuovi video registrati il 28 ottobre. Paola Provvisier ci racconta QUI la completezza delle soluzioni HCM, mentre Giovanni Ravasio, Country Leader di Oracle Applications Italia, insieme a Fabrizio Pessina (Boston Consulting Group) e a Paolo Daperno (Illycaffè), fanno QUI il punto della situazione sull'offerta Cloud di Oracle, sul panorama Cloud in Italia e perchè le aziende scelgono nuovi servizi per implementare e migliorare la propria realtà.

    Read the article

  • How to do dependency Injection and conditional object creation based on type?

    - by Pradeep
    I have a service endpoint initialized using DI. It is of the following style. This end point is used across the app. public class CustomerService : ICustomerService { private IValidationService ValidationService { get; set; } private ICustomerRepository Repository { get; set; } public CustomerService(IValidationService validationService,ICustomerRepository repository) { ValidationService = validationService; Repository = repository; } public void Save(CustomerDTO customer) { if (ValidationService.Valid(customer)) Repository.Save(customer); } Now, With the changing requirements, there are going to be different types of customers (Legacy/Regular). The requirement is based on the type of the customer I have to validate and persist the customer in a different way (e.g. if Legacy customer persist to LegacyRepository). The wrong way to do this will be to break DI and do somthing like public void Save(CustomerDTO customer) { if(customer.Type == CustomerTypes.Legacy) { if (LegacyValidationService.Valid(customer)) LegacyRepository.Save(customer); } else { if (ValidationService.Valid(customer)) Repository.Save(customer); } } My options to me seems like DI all possible IValidationService and ICustomerRepository and switch based on type, which seems wrong. The other is to change the service signature to Save(IValidationService validation, ICustomerRepository repository, CustomerDTO customer) which is an invasive change. Break DI. Use the Strategy pattern approach for each type and do something like: validation= CustomerValidationServiceFactory.GetStratedgy(customer.Type); validation.Valid(customer) but now I have a static method which needs to know how to initialize different services. I am sure this is a very common problem, What is the right way to solve this without changing service signatures or breaking DI?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >