Search Results

Search found 24207 results on 969 pages for 'anonymous users'.

Page 5/969 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • access exception when invoking method of an anonymous class using java reflection

    - by Asaf David
    Hello I'm trying to use an event dispatcher to allow a model to notify subscribed listeners when it changes. the event dispatcher receives a handler class and a method name to call during dispatch. the presenter subscribes to the model changes and provide a Handler implementation to be called on changes. Here's the code (I'm sorry it's a bit long). EventDispacther: package utils; public class EventDispatcher<T> { List<T> listeners; private String methodName; public EventDispatcher(String methodName) { listeners = new ArrayList<T>(); this.methodName = methodName; } public void add(T listener) { listeners.add(listener); } public void dispatch() { for (T listener : listeners) { try { Method method = listener.getClass().getMethod(methodName); method.invoke(listener); } catch (Exception e) { System.out.println(e.getMessage()); } } } } Model: package model; public class Model { private EventDispatcher<ModelChangedHandler> dispatcher; public Model() { dispatcher = new EventDispatcher<ModelChangedHandler>("modelChanged"); } public void whenModelChange(ModelChangedHandler handler) { dispatcher.add(handler); } public void change() { dispatcher.dispatch(); } } ModelChangedHandler: package model; public interface ModelChangedHandler { void modelChanged(); } Presenter: package presenter; public class Presenter { private final Model model; public Presenter(Model model) { this.model = model; this.model.whenModelChange(new ModelChangedHandler() { @Override public void modelChanged() { System.out.println("model changed"); } }); } } Main: package main; public class Main { public static void main(String[] args) { Model model = new Model(); Presenter presenter = new Presenter(model); model.change(); } } Now, I except to get the "model changed" message. However, I'm getting an java.lang.IllegalAccessException: Class utils.EventDispatcher can not access a member of class presenter.Presenter$1 with modifiers "public". I understand that the class to blame is the anonymous class i created inside the presenter, however I don't know how to make it any more 'public' than it currently is. If i replace it with a named nested class it seem to work. It also works if the Presenter and the EventDispatcher are in the same package, but I can't allow that (several presenters in different packages should use the EventDispatcher) any ideas?

    Read the article

  • How to open the Select Users, Computers, Service Accounts or Groups

    - by Dave Rook
    The only way I know how to open the Select Users, Computers, Service Accounts or Groups is by right clicking on a folder and selecting Properties - Security Tab - Edit - Advanced. Below is a screen shot of the window I want to access: Is there any other way to view the full list (Find Now)? I am writing documentation and I want the user to check if a user exists before creating it. I would ideally like them to access this via control panel or similar.

    Read the article

  • Domain users sometimes cannot access our NAS

    - by Natalie
    I'm using a QNAP TS-410 Turbo NAS and I've got domain users connecting to it frequently everyday. However, there are times when their connection to the NAS will seem to just drop and, suddenly, they cannot access their network drives (which I had set up our Domain Controller to automatically map to folders on the NAS). Could you please tell me what may cause this? I don't think it is a network issue as everything else seems to work just fine. (If more details are needed, please let me know so I can update this question.)

    Read the article

  • Add users in Windows machine without AD

    - by guillem
    I have several development machines where I am the administrator. We are using AD in my organization but is maintained by and offshore IT group any request takes a long time. We are currently granting access to developers on development machines manually so it's a bit annoying to maintain although at least it's fast. We have also a lot of external consultants that need to use those machines for some time. Is there any tool or method to maintain a set of users synced on those machines without the need add them to an AD group?

    Read the article

  • Django anonymous user in model

    - by jack
    I have a model defined as below: class Example(models.Model): user = models.ForeignKey(User, null=True) other = models.CharField(max_length=100) The problem is Django refuses to assign django.contrib.auth.models.AnonymousUser directly to Example.user as null field so everytime I have to check if request.user.is_authenticated() ans assign Example.user = None manually. Is there a default value for AnonymousUser to use in a model field?

    Read the article

  • CoffeeScript Class Properties Within Nested Anonymous Functions

    - by Aric
    I'm just taking a look at CoffeeScript for the first time so bare with me if this is a dumb question. I'm familiar with the hidden pattern methodology however I'm still wrapping my head around object prototypes. I'm trying to create a basic class for controlling a section on my site. The problem I'm running into is losing defined class variables within a different scope. For example, the code below works fine and creates the properties within the object perfectly. However when I jump into a jQuery callback I lose all knowledge of the class variables storing some of the jQuery objects for multiple uses. Is there a way to grab them from within the callback function? class Session initBinds: -> @loginForm.bind 'ajax:success', (data, status, xhr) -> console.log("processed") return @loginForm.bind 'ajax:before', (xhr, settings) -> console.log @loader // need access to Session.loader return return init: -> @loginForm = $("form#login-form") @loader = $("img#login-loader") this.initBinds() return

    Read the article

  • anonymous function variable scope [js, ajax]

    - by arthurprs
    $(".delete").click( function() { var thesender = this; $(thesender).text("Del..."); $.getJSON("ajax.php", {}, function(data) { if (data["result"]) $(thesender).remove(); // variable defined outside else alert('Error!'); } ); return false; } ); This can cause problems if user clicks on another ".delete" before the ajax callback is called?

    Read the article

  • PHP anonymous functions scope question

    - by Dan
    Hi, I'm trying to sort an array of objects by a common property, however I cannot get my $property parameter to register in the inner function (I can use it in the outer one OK). The way I read the documentation, it sounded like the parameter would be available, have I misunderstood something? Here is what I have: public static function sortObjectsByProperty($objects, $property) { function compare_object($a, $b) { $a = $a->$property; $b = $b->$property; if ($a->$property == $b->$property) { return 0; } return ($a->$property > $b->$property) ? +1 : -1; } usort($objects, 'compare_object'); return $objects; } Any advice appreciated. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Self-Executing Anonymous Function vs Prototype

    - by Robotsushi
    In Javascript there are a few clearly prominent techniques for create and manage classes/namespaces in javascript. I am curious what situations warrant using one technique vs. the other. I want to pick one and stick with it moving forward. I write enterprise code that is maintained and shared across multiple teams, and I want to know what is the best practice when writing maintainable javascript ? I tend to prefer Self-Executing Anonymous Functions however I am curious what the community vote is on these techniques. Prototype : function obj() { } obj.prototype.test = function() { alert('Hello?'); }; var obj2 = new obj(); obj2.test(); Self-Closing Anonymous Function : //Self-Executing Anonymous Function (function( skillet, $, undefined ) { //Private Property var isHot = true; //Public Property skillet.ingredient = "Bacon Strips"; //Public Method skillet.fry = function() { var oliveOil; addItem( "\t\n Butter \n\t" ); addItem( oliveOil ); console.log( "Frying " + skillet.ingredient ); }; //Private Method function addItem( item ) { if ( item !== undefined ) { console.log( "Adding " + $.trim(item) ); } } }( window.skillet = window.skillet || {}, jQuery )); //Public Properties console.log( skillet.ingredient ); //Bacon Strips //Public Methods skillet.fry(); //Adding Butter & Fraying Bacon Strips //Adding a Public Property skillet.quantity = "12"; console.log( skillet.quantity ); //12 //Adding New Functionality to the Skillet (function( skillet, $, undefined ) { //Private Property var amountOfGrease = "1 Cup"; //Public Method skillet.toString = function() { console.log( skillet.quantity + " " + skillet.ingredient + " & " + amountOfGrease + " of Grease" ); console.log( isHot ? "Hot" : "Cold" ); }; }( window.skillet = window.skillet || {}, jQuery )); //end of skillet definition try { //12 Bacon Strips & 1 Cup of Grease skillet.toString(); //Throws Exception } catch( e ) { console.log( e.message ); //isHot is not defined } I feel that I should mention that the Self-Executing Anonymous Function is the pattern used by the jQuery team. Update When I asked this question I didn't truly see the importance of what I was trying to understand. The real issue at hand is whether or not to use new to create instances of your objects or to use patterns which do not require constructors of the use of the new keyword. I added my own answer, because in my opinion we should make use of patterns which don't use the new keyword. For more information please see my answer.

    Read the article

  • How to allow users to transfer files to other users on linux

    - by Jon Bringhurst
    We have an environment of a few thousand users running applications on about 40 clusters ranging in size from 20 compute nodes to 98,000 compute nodes. Users on these systems generate massive files (sometimes 1PB) controlled by traditional unix permissions (ACLs usually aren't available or practical due to the specialized nature of the filesystem). We currently have a program called "give", which is a suid-root program that allows a user to "give" a file to another user when group permissions are insufficient. So, a user would type something like the following to give a file to another user: > give username-to-give-to filename-to-give ... The receiving user can then use a command called "take" (part of the give program) to receive the file: > take filename-to-receive The permissions of the file are then effectively transferred over to the receiving user. This program has been around for years and we'd like to revisit things from a security and functional point of view. Our current plan of action is to remove the bit rot in our current implementation of "give" and package it up as an open source app before we redeploy it into production. Does anyone have another method they use to transfer extremely large files between users when only traditional unix permissions are available?

    Read the article

  • Anonymous functions in C#

    - by Maxim Gershkovich
    The following syntax is valid VB.NET code Dim myCollection As New List(Of Stock) myCollection.Add(New Stock(Guid.NewGuid, "Item1")) myCollection.Add(New Stock(Guid.NewGuid, "Item2")) Dim res As List(Of Stock) = myCollection.FindAll(Function(stock As Stock) As Boolean If stock.Description = "Item2" Then Return True End If Return False End Function) How can I accomplish the same thing in C#? I have tried... myCollection.FindAll(bool delegate(Stock stock) { if (blah blah) { } }); But it appears I have somehow structured it incorrectly as I get the following error. "Error 1 Invalid expression term 'bool'"

    Read the article

  • Anonymous functions IE issue/problem in Javascript

    - by Bragaadeesh
    Hi guys, I am having a javascript written like this. imageDiv.onclick = function(){xyz.deleteImage(param1, param2);return false;}; Now things are fine in Firefox, Chrome and Safari. But I have a strange issue in Internet Explorer. What happens is, when I click on the imageDiv in my page, the deleteImage() method is getting invoked twice. One being the actual deleteimage() method thats given here and another is the deleteimage() method that I have in the page. How to resolve this issue. Please help.

    Read the article

  • How to use robocopy to move Users folder from partition c to d on Windows 7?

    - by Bastian
    I just tried to copy my Users folder from partition C to partition D using the method mentioned in this post. Unfortunately I encountered two problems: When using the command robocopy c:\Users d:\Users /mir /xj /copyall, robocopy says that it can't find the file C:\Users\, although it exists. When using the command robocopy x:\Users d:\Users /mir /xj /copyall, robocopy says that it cannot find the path d:\Users\Administrator\Application Data, error code <0x00000003>. I started the command line mode of my Windows 7 installation disk (repair mode). Does anybody know what the reasons for these errors might be?

    Read the article

  • find users that are following other users

    - by Jakob
    Hi I'm wondering how I can go about this problem I have a DB with a Users Table, and a Followers table. The Followers table contains 2 Columns "FollowerID" and "FollowedID" I have a 1 - * relation in my datamodel between Users.ID -> Followers.FollowerID and Users.ID -> FollowedID How do I in LINQ get a set of users that are following a specific user? I'll express what I'm trying to achieve programatically I can get this far: ctx.Followers.Where(f => f.FollowedID == CurrentUser.ID) so now i have a Followers set where I have the ID of the users that follow the CurrentUser, and I could iterate through this collection and then add users after each iteration to a collection that would be a total USER collection that followed CurrentUser, but isn't there a smarter, or LINQ'er way to do this? Much appreciated Thx

    Read the article

  • Should users be deleted after inactivity on a website?

    - by Hovaness Bartamian
    When you have a social website or a website where you can register, would you eventually delete them after a certain time (after a year of inactivity) or would you rather keep their account records for ever? I know websites like Facebook have large amount of inactive, duplicated and fake accounts. So I'm wondering if after two years of inactivity it would be alright to send the account a warning email of deletion unless they log in. Just thinking of a clean and efficient database management or any implications this may cause to new potential users.

    Read the article

  • Sinatra and XML POST request

    - by user292815
    I don't know is it my mistake or no. So i have that code: <code> post '/singin/get_token' do content_type :xml puts request.body.read puts xmlRequest xmlRequest = REXML::Document.new(request.body.read) ... </code> And when i post something like that: <code> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><request xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><username>adsfasdf</username></request> </code> I receive that in my console: <code> 127.0.0.1 - - [12/Mar/2010 21:18:20] "POST /singin/get_token HTTP/1.1" 500 105872 0.1339 Iconv::InvalidCharacter - ">": /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/encodings/ICONV.rb:7:in `conv' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/encodings/ICONV.rb:7:in `decode_iconv' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/source.rb:58:in `encoding=' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/source.rb:46:in `initialize' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/source.rb:164:in `initialize' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/source.rb:17:in `new' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/source.rb:17:in `create_from' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/parsers/baseparser.rb:146:in `stream=' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/parsers/baseparser.rb:123:in `initialize' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/parsers/treeparser.rb:9:in `new' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/parsers/treeparser.rb:9:in `initialize' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/document.rb:228:in `new' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/document.rb:228:in `build' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/document.rb:43:in `initialize' zaiaku-game-server.rb:70:in `new' zaiaku-game-server.rb:70:in `block in <main>' /Users/andoriyu/.gem/ruby/1.9.1/gems/rack-1.1.0/lib/rack/showexceptions.rb:24:in `call' /Users/andoriyu/.gem/ruby/1.9.1/gems/rack-1.1.0/lib/rack/methodoverride.rb:24:in `call' /Users/andoriyu/.gem/ruby/1.9.1/gems/rack-1.1.0/lib/rack/commonlogger.rb:18:in `call' /Users/andoriyu/.gem/ruby/1.9.1/gems/rack-1.1.0/lib/rack/content_length.rb:13:in `call' /Users/andoriyu/.gem/ruby/1.9.1/gems/rack-1.1.0/lib/rack/chunked.rb:15:in `call' /Users/andoriyu/.gem/ruby/1.9.1/gems/rack-1.1.0/lib/rack/handler/thin.rb:14:in `run'Iconv::InvalidCharacter: ">" /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/encodings/ICONV.rb:7:in `conv' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/encodings/ICONV.rb:7:in `decode_iconv' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/source.rb:58:in `encoding=' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/source.rb:46:in `initialize' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/source.rb:164:in `initialize' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/source.rb:17:in `new' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/source.rb:17:in `create_from' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/parsers/baseparser.rb:146:in `stream=' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/parsers/baseparser.rb:123:in `initialize' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/parsers/treeparser.rb:9:in `new' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/parsers/treeparser.rb:9:in `initialize' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/document.rb:228:in `new' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/document.rb:228:in `build' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rexml/document.rb:43:in `initialize' zaiaku-game-server.rb:70:in `new' zaiaku-game-server.rb:70:in `block in <main>' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sinatra-0.9.6/lib/sinatra/base.rb:811:in `call' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sinatra-0.9.6/lib/sinatra/base.rb:811:in `block in route' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sinatra-0.9.6/lib/sinatra/base.rb:488:in `instance_eval' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sinatra-0.9.6/lib/sinatra/base.rb:488:in `route_eval' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sinatra-0.9.6/lib/sinatra/base.rb:477:in `block (2 levels) in route!' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sinatra-0.9.6/lib/sinatra/base.rb:474:in `catch' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sinatra-0.9.6/lib/sinatra/base.rb:474:in `block in route!' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sinatra-0.9.6/lib/sinatra/base.rb:453:in `each' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sinatra-0.9.6/lib/sinatra/base.rb:453:in `route!' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sinatra-0.9.6/lib/sinatra/base.rb:569:in `dispatch!' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sinatra-0.9.6/lib/sinatra/base.rb:388:in `block in call!' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sinatra-0.9.6/lib/sinatra/base.rb:536:in `instance_eval' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sinatra-0.9.6/lib/sinatra/base.rb:536:in `block in invoke' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sinatra-0.9.6/lib/sinatra/base.rb:536:in `catch' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sinatra-0.9.6/lib/sinatra/base.rb:536:in `invoke' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sinatra-0.9.6/lib/sinatra/base.rb:388:in `call!' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sinatra-0.9.6/lib/sinatra/base.rb:377:in `call' /Users/andoriyu/.gem/ruby/1.9.1/gems/rack-1.1.0/lib/rack/showexceptions.rb:24:in `call' /Users/andoriyu/.gem/ruby/1.9.1/gems/rack-1.1.0/lib/rack/methodoverride.rb:24:in `call' /Users/andoriyu/.gem/ruby/1.9.1/gems/rack-1.1.0/lib/rack/commonlogger.rb:18:in `call' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sinatra-0.9.6/lib/sinatra/base.rb:928:in `block in call' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sinatra-0.9.6/lib/sinatra/base.rb:973:in `synchronize' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sinatra-0.9.6/lib/sinatra/base.rb:928:in `call' /Users/andoriyu/.gem/ruby/1.9.1/gems/rack-1.1.0/lib/rack/content_length.rb:13:in `call' /Users/andoriyu/.gem/ruby/1.9.1/gems/rack-1.1.0/lib/rack/chunked.rb:15:in `call' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/thin-1.2.7/lib/thin/connection.rb:76:in `block in pre_process' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/thin-1.2.7/lib/thin/connection.rb:74:in `catch' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/thin-1.2.7/lib/thin/connection.rb:74:in `pre_process' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/thin-1.2.7/lib/thin/connection.rb:57:in `process' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/thin-1.2.7/lib/thin/connection.rb:42:in `receive_data' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/eventmachine-0.12.10/lib/eventmachine.rb:256:in `run_machine' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/eventmachine-0.12.10/lib/eventmachine.rb:256:in `run' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/thin-1.2.7/lib/thin/backends/base.rb:57:in `start' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/thin-1.2.7/lib/thin/server.rb:156:in `start' /Users/andoriyu/.gem/ruby/1.9.1/gems/rack-1.1.0/lib/rack/handler/thin.rb:14:in `run' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sinatra-0.9.6/lib/sinatra/base.rb:896:in `run!' /Users/andoriyu/.homebrew/Cellar/ruby/1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sinatra-0.9.6/lib/sinatra/main.rb:35:in `block in <top (required)>' !! Unexpected error while processing request: incompatible character encodings: ASCII-8BIT and UTF-8 <code>

    Read the article

  • Exception with RubyAMF and Ruby 1.9 although code works

    - by Tam
    I'm getting an exception with RubyAMF using Ruby 1.9 and Rails 2.3.5. Although code afterward executes normally I'm not very comfortable with seeing such exception in the log file. Do you know what is causing it: >>>>>>>> RubyAMF >>>>>>>>> #<RubyAMF::Actions::PrepareAction:0x0000010139ff48> took: 0.00020 secs >>>>>>>> RubyAMF >>>>>>>>> #<RubyAMF::Actions::RailsInvokeAction:0x0000010139ff10> took: 0.29973 secs You have a nil object when you didn't expect it! You might have expected an instance of Array. The error occurred while evaluating nil.include? /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/attribute_methods.rb:142:in `create_time_zone_conversion_attribute?' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/attribute_methods.rb:75:in `block in define_attribute_methods' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/attribute_methods.rb:71:in `each' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/attribute_methods.rb:71:in `define_attribute_methods' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/attribute_methods.rb:242:in `method_missing' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/base.rb:2832:in `hash' /Users/tammam56/lal/vendor/plugins/ruby_amf/io/amf_serializer.rb:366:in `hash' /Users/tammam56/lal/vendor/plugins/ruby_amf/io/amf_serializer.rb:366:in `hash' /Users/tammam56/lal/vendor/plugins/ruby_amf/io/amf_serializer.rb:366:in `[]=' /Users/tammam56/lal/vendor/plugins/ruby_amf/io/amf_serializer.rb:366:in `store_object' /Users/tammam56/lal/vendor/plugins/ruby_amf/io/amf_serializer.rb:234:in `write_amf3_object' /Users/tammam56/lal/vendor/plugins/ruby_amf/io/amf_serializer.rb:154:in `write_amf3' /Users/tammam56/lal/vendor/plugins/ruby_amf/io/amf_serializer.rb:78:in `write' /Users/tammam56/lal/vendor/plugins/ruby_amf/io/amf_serializer.rb:70:in `block in run' /Users/tammam56/lal/vendor/plugins/ruby_amf/io/amf_serializer.rb:56:in `upto' /Users/tammam56/lal/vendor/plugins/ruby_amf/io/amf_serializer.rb:56:in `run' /Users/tammam56/lal/vendor/plugins/ruby_amf/app/filters.rb:91:in `block in run' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/benchmark.rb:309:in `realtime' /Users/tammam56/lal/vendor/plugins/ruby_amf/app/filters.rb:91:in `run' /Users/tammam56/lal/vendor/plugins/ruby_amf/app/filters.rb:12:in `block in run' /Users/tammam56/lal/vendor/plugins/ruby_amf/app/filters.rb:11:in `each' /Users/tammam56/lal/vendor/plugins/ruby_amf/app/filters.rb:11:in `run' /Users/tammam56/lal/vendor/plugins/ruby_amf/app/rails_gateway.rb:28:in `service' /Users/tammam56/lal/app/controllers/rubyamf_controller.rb:19:in `gateway' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/base.rb:1331:in `perform_action' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/filters.rb:617:in `call_filters' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/filters.rb:610:in `perform_action_with_filters' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/benchmarking.rb:68:in `block in perform_action_with_benchmark' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/activesupport-2.3.5/lib/active_support/core_ext/benchmark.rb:17:in `block in ms' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.1-p378/lib/ruby/1.9.1/benchmark.rb:309:in `realtime' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/activesupport-2.3.5/lib/active_support/core_ext/benchmark.rb:17:in `ms' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/benchmarking.rb:68:in `perform_action_with_benchmark' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/rescue.rb:160:in `perform_action_with_rescue' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/flash.rb:146:in `perform_action_with_flash' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/base.rb:532:in `process' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/filters.rb:606:in `process_with_filters' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/base.rb:391:in `process' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/base.rb:386:in `call' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/routing/route_set.rb:437:in `call' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/dispatcher.rb:87:in `dispatch' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/dispatcher.rb:121:in `_call' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/dispatcher.rb:130:in `block in build_middleware_stack' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/query_cache.rb:29:in `call' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/query_cache.rb:29:in `block in call' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/query_cache.rb:34:in `cache' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/query_cache.rb:9:in `cache' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/query_cache.rb:28:in `call' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/connection_pool.rb:361:in `call' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/string_coercion.rb:25:in `call' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/rack-1.0.1/lib/rack/head.rb:9:in `call' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/rack-1.0.1/lib/rack/methodoverride.rb:24:in `call' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/params_parser.rb:15:in `call' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/session/cookie_store.rb:93:in `call' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/failsafe.rb:26:in `call' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/rack-1.0.1/lib/rack/lock.rb:11:in `block in call' <internal:prelude>:8:in `synchronize' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/rack-1.0.1/lib/rack/lock.rb:11:in `call' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/dispatcher.rb:114:in `block in call' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/reloader.rb:34:in `run' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/dispatcher.rb:108:in `call' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/rails/rack/static.rb:31:in `call' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/rack-1.0.1/lib/rack/urlmap.rb:46:in `block in call' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/rack-1.0.1/lib/rack/urlmap.rb:40:in `each' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/rack-1.0.1/lib/rack/urlmap.rb:40:in `call' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/rails/rack/log_tailer.rb:17:in `call' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/rack-1.0.1/lib/rack/content_length.rb:13:in `call' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/rack-1.0.1/lib/rack/chunked.rb:15:in `call' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/rack-1.0.1/lib/rack/handler/mongrel.rb:64:in `process' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/lib/mongrel.rb:159:in `block in process_client' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/lib/mongrel.rb:158:in `each' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/lib/mongrel.rb:158:in `process_client' /Users/tammam56/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.1-p378/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/lib/mongrel.rb:285:in `block (2 levels) in run '

    Read the article

  • Dovecot Virtual Users and Users Domain Mapping

    - by Stojko
    I have successfully compiled, configured and ran Dovecot with virtual users feature. Here's part of my /etc/dovecot.conf configuration file: mail_location = maildir:/home/%d/%n/Maildir auth default { mechanisms = plain login userdb passwd-file { args = /home/%d/etc/passwd } passdb passwd-file { args = /home/%d/etc/shadow } socket listen { master { path = /var/run/dovecot/auth-worker mode = 0600 } } } I faced one issue I can't resolve myself. Is there anyway to create users' domains mapping and provide username in mail_location? Examples: 1. currently I have /home/domain.com/user/Maildir 2. I'd like to have /home/USER/domain.com/user/Maildir Can I achieve this somehow? Greets, Stojko

    Read the article

  • Take care to unhook Anonymous Delegates

    - by David Vallens
    Anonymous delegates are great, they elimiante the need for lots of small classes that just pass values around, however care needs to be taken when using them, as they are not automatically unhooked when the function you created them in returns. In fact after it returns there is no way to unhook them. Consider the following code.   using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Text; using System.Diagnostics; namespace ConsoleApplication1 { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { SimpleEventSource t = new SimpleEventSource(); t.FireEvent(); FunctionWithAnonymousDelegate(t); t.FireEvent(); } private static void FunctionWithAnonymousDelegate(SimpleEventSource t) { t.MyEvent += delegate(object sender, EventArgs args) { Debug.WriteLine("Anonymous delegate called"); }; t.FireEvent(); } } public class SimpleEventSource { public event EventHandler MyEvent; public void FireEvent() { if (MyEvent == null) { Debug.WriteLine("Attempting to fire event - but no ones listening"); } else { Debug.WriteLine("Firing event"); MyEvent(this, EventArgs.Empty); } } } } If you expected the anonymous delegates do die with the function that created it then you would expect the output Attempting to fire event - but no ones listeningFiring eventAnonymous delegate calledAttempting to fire event - but no ones listening However what you actually get is Attempting to fire event - but no ones listeningFiring eventAnonymous delegate calledFiring eventAnonymous delegate called In my example the issue is just slowing things down, but if your delegate modifies objects, then you could end up with dificult to diagnose bugs. A solution to this problem is to unhook the delegate within the function var myDelegate = delegate(){Console.WriteLine("I did it!");}; MyEvent += myDelegate; // .... later MyEvent -= myDelegate;

    Read the article

  • Temporary users table or legitimate users table?

    - by John
    I have a freelance web application that lets users register for events. In my database, I have a t_events_applicants table with the column t_events_applications.user_id with a foreign key constraint linked to the t_users.user_id column. So this means only users who have registered with my web application can register for my web application's events. My client would now like to allow non-registered users, users who do not have an entry in my t_user table, to register for events. These non-registered users only need to provide their name and email address to register for events. Should I create a t_temporary_user table with columns name and email and then remove the t_events_applicants.user_id fk constraint? Or should I add un-registered users to the t_user table and then add a column called t_user.type where type can be 'registered' or 'non-registered'? How do I decide which approach to go with? A lot of times, I hesitate with either approach. I ask myself, "What if at a later time, a temporary user is allowed to become a fully registered user? Then maybe I should have only a t_user table. But then I also don't feel good about storing a lot of temporary users in t_user."

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >