Search Results

Search found 663 results on 27 pages for 'fork'.

Page 5/27 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • C Named pipe (fifo). Parent process gets stuck

    - by Blitzkr1eg
    I want to make a simple program, that fork, and the child writes into the named pipe and the parent reads and displays from the named pipe. The problem is that it enters the parent, does the first printf and then it gets weird, it doesn't do anything else, does not get to the second printf, it just ways for input in the console. #include <string.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <fcntl.h> void main() { char t[100]; mkfifo("myfifo",777); pid_t pid; pid = fork(); if (pid==0) { //execl("fifo2","fifo2",(char*)0); char r[100]; printf("scrie2->"); scanf("%s",r); int fp; fp = open("myfifo",O_WRONLY); write(fp,r,99); close(fp); printf("exit kid \n"); exit(0); } else { wait(0); printf("entered parent \n"); // <- this it prints // whats below this line apparently its not being executed int fz; printf("1"); fz = open("myfifo",O_RDONLY); printf("2"); printf("fd: %d",fz); char p[100]; int size; printf("------"); //struct stat *info; //stat("myfifo",info); printf("%d",(*info).st_size); read(fz,p,99); close(fz); printf("%s",p); printf("exit"); exit(0); } }

    Read the article

  • Sending floating point values between processes with pipes in C

    - by Alex
    Is there a standard way of sending floating point values from a child process to a parent process in C. I have a some calculations where I want to fork a process, then have the child do some busy work, the parent do something else, and then the child send its values (which are doubles) back to the parent (presumably through a pipe). Clearly the parent could parse the stream, but I'm just wondering if there's a cleaner way?

    Read the article

  • Using Unix Process Controll Methods in Ruby

    - by John F. Miller
    Ryan Tomayko touched off quite a fire storm with this post about using Unix process control commands. We should be doing more of this. A lot more of this. I'm talking about fork(2), execve(2), pipe(2), socketpair(2), select(2), kill(2), sigaction(2), and so on and so forth. These are our friends. They want so badly just to help us. I have a bit of code (a delayed_job clone for DataMapper that I think would fit right in with this, but I'm not clear on how to take advantage of the listed commands. Any Ideas on how to improve this code? def start say "*** Starting job worker #{@name}" t = Thread.new do loop do delay = Update.work_off(self) break if $exit sleep delay break if $exit end clear_locks end trap('TERM') { terminate_with t } trap('INT') { terminate_with t } trap('USR1') do say "Wakeup Signal Caught" t.run end end

    Read the article

  • ptrace'ing of parent process

    - by osgx
    Hello Can child process use the ptrace system call to trace its parent? Os is linux 2.6 Thanks. upd1: I want to trace process1 from "itself". It is impossible, so I do fork and try to do ptrace(process1_pid, PTRACE_ATTACH) from child process. But I can't, there is a strange error, like kernel prohibits child from tracing their parent processes UPD2: such tracing can be prohibited by security policies. Which polices do this? Where is the checking code in the kernel? UPD3: on my embedded linux I have no errors with PEEKDATA, but not with GETREGS: child: getregs parent: -1 errno is 1, strerror is Operation not permitted errno = EPERM

    Read the article

  • Perl unit test - start a tcp server & continue

    - by John
    I am trying to write a unit test for a client server application. To test the client, in my unit test, I want to first start my tcp server (which itself is another perl file). I tried to start the tcp server by forking: if (! fork()) { system ("$^X server.pl") == 0 or die "couldn't start server" } So when I call "make test" after "perl Makefile.PL", this test starts & I can see the server starting but after that the unit test just hangs there. So I guess I need to start this server in background and I tried the "&" at the end to force it to start in background & then test to continue. But, I still couldn't succeed. What am I doing wrong? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Faster forking of large processes on Linux ?

    - by timday
    What's the fastest, best way on modern Linux of achieving the same effect as a fork-execve combo from a large process ? My problem is that the process forking is ~500MByte big, and a simple benchmarking test achieves only about 50 forks/s from the process (c.f ~1600 forks/s from a minimally sized process) which is too slow for the intended application. Some googling turns up vfork as having being invented as the solution to this problem... but also warnings about not to use it. Modern Linux seems to have acquired related clone and posix_spawn calls; are these likely to help ? What's the modern replacement for vfork ? I'm using 64bit Debian Lenny on an i7 (the project could move to Squeeze if posix_spawn would help).

    Read the article

  • How can I start a TCP server in the background during a Perl unit test?

    - by John
    I am trying to write a unit test for a client server application. To test the client, in my unit test, I want to first start my tcp server (which itself is another perl file). I tried to start the TCP server by forking: if (! fork()) { system ("$^X server.pl") == 0 or die "couldn't start server" } So when I call make test after perl Makefile.PL, this test starts and I can see the server starting but after that the unit test just hangs there. So I guess I need to start this server in background and I tried the & at the end to force it to start in background and then test to continue. But, I still couldn't succeed. What am I doing wrong? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • execution of instructions in a child process

    - by ness kh
    I want to exit from a child process when the execution of os.system(comm) will be executed. My code is: pid = os.fork() if pid == 0: #instruction else: comm = "python file.py" os.system(comm) os.exit(error) Now, my file file.py contains a loop, and I can get out from it only if a condition is satisfied. But, even when the condition is not satisfied, the program exits from the loop and displays the message error. Also it doesn't execute the rest of instructions in file.py. file.py is : while 1: if(condition): break # rest of instructions

    Read the article

  • How do I propagate an exception thrown by croak in forked child to parent/foreground process?

    - by Pedro Silva
    Throwing an exception via croak in a forked child process seems to print the error as a background process would. That is, it clobbers the shell prompt. If I die instead of croak, the the error message pops up as a foreground process. I've trying to find out why that is in the Carp documentation without any luck. Here's what I mean. The croak version: $ perl Wrapper.pm $ error: ... does not exist at Wrapper.pm line 624 The die version: $ perl Wrapper.pm error: ... does not exist at Wrapper.pm line 515. I tried trapping the fork and printing $@ to STDERR and exiting, but that didn't have an effect. Any ideas? I'd like to be able to use croak in this particular case.

    Read the article

  • Linux Mint 14 disponible en Release Candidate, "Nadia" sort avec Nemo le fork de Nautilus, les bureaux Cinnamon 1.6 et Mate 1.4

    "Nadia" : Linux Mint 14 disponible en Release Candidate avec Nemo, le fork de Nautilus les bureaux Cinnamon 1.6 et Mate 1.4 [IMG]http://www.franck-depan.fr/images/logo/systemes-exploitation/linux/distribution-mint/mint-logo.png[/IMG] L'équipe de développement de GNU/Linux Mint annonce la Release Candidate de la quatorzième version de sa distribution fondée sur Ubuntu Voici une brève liste des nouveautés :Mate 1.4 Cinnamon 1.6 Mint Desktop Manager Software Manager améliorations système Mate 1.4 Mate 1.4 renforce non seulement la...

    Read the article

  • Nautilus 3.6 est une catastrophe pour le créateur de Linux Mint, qui présente Nemo, le fork du gestionnaire de fichiers

    Nautilus 3.6 est une catastrophe pour le créateur de Linux Mint qui présente Nemo, le fork du gestionnaire de fichiers Le ton est à la provocation dans le monde de l'open source. Après Miguel De Icaza, le créateur de l'environnement de bureau GNOME, qui a déclaré que Linux avait échoué sur le Desktop, s'attirant les foudres de Linus Torvalds, c'est au tour d'un autre acteur de l'open source de faire une déclaration toute aussi controversée. Clement Lefebvre, créateur et responsable du développement de la distribution Linux Mint vient de déclarer dans un billet de blog que Nautilus 3.6 est une catastrophe.

    Read the article

  • Gerrit code review, or Github's fork and pull model?

    - by user1366476
    I am starting a software project that will be team AND community developed. I was previously sold on gerrit, but now github's fork and pull request model seem to almost provide more tools, ways to visualize commits, and ease of use. For someone who has at least a little experience with both, what are the pros/cons of each, and which would be better for a team based project which wants to leave open the possibility for community development?

    Read the article

  • Reading a child process's /proc/pid/mem file from the parent

    - by Amittai Aviram
    In the program below, I am trying to cause the following to happen: Process A assigns a value to a stack variable a. Process A (parent) creates process B (child) with PID child_pid. Process B calls function func1, passing a pointer to a. Process B changes the value of variable a through the pointer. Process B opens its /proc/self/mem file, seeks to the page containing a, and prints the new value of a. Process A (at the same time) opens /proc/child_pid/mem, seeks to the right page, and prints the new value of a. The problem is that, in step 6, the parent only sees the old value of a in /proc/child_pid/mem, while the child can indeed see the new value in its /proc/self/mem. Why is this the case? Is there any way that I can get the parent to to see the child's changes to its address space through the /proc filesystem? #include <fcntl.h> #include <stdbool.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #include <unistd.h> #define PAGE_SIZE 0x1000 #define LOG_PAGE_SIZE 0xc #define PAGE_ROUND_DOWN(v) ((v) & (~(PAGE_SIZE - 1))) #define PAGE_ROUND_UP(v) (((v) + PAGE_SIZE - 1) & (~(PAGE_SIZE - 1))) #define OFFSET_IN_PAGE(v) ((v) & (PAGE_SIZE - 1)) # if defined ARCH && ARCH == 32 #define BP "ebp" #define SP "esp" #else #define BP "rbp" #define SP "rsp" #endif typedef struct arg_t { int a; } arg_t; void func1(void * data) { arg_t * arg_ptr = (arg_t *)data; printf("func1: old value: %d\n", arg_ptr->a); arg_ptr->a = 53; printf("func1: address: %p\n", &arg_ptr->a); printf("func1: new value: %d\n", arg_ptr->a); } void expore_proc_mem(void (*fn)(void *), void * data) { off_t frame_pointer, stack_start; char buffer[PAGE_SIZE]; const char * path = "/proc/self/mem"; int child_pid, status; int parent_to_child[2]; int child_to_parent[2]; arg_t * arg_ptr; off_t child_offset; asm volatile ("mov %%"BP", %0" : "=m" (frame_pointer)); stack_start = PAGE_ROUND_DOWN(frame_pointer); printf("Stack_start: %lx\n", (unsigned long)stack_start); arg_ptr = (arg_t *)data; child_offset = OFFSET_IN_PAGE((off_t)&arg_ptr->a); printf("Address of arg_ptr->a: %p\n", &arg_ptr->a); pipe(parent_to_child); pipe(child_to_parent); bool msg; int child_mem_fd; char child_path[0x20]; child_pid = fork(); if (child_pid == -1) { perror("fork"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } if (!child_pid) { close(child_to_parent[0]); close(parent_to_child[1]); printf("CHILD (pid %d, parent pid %d).\n", getpid(), getppid()); fn(data); msg = true; write(child_to_parent[1], &msg, 1); child_mem_fd = open("/proc/self/mem", O_RDONLY); if (child_mem_fd == -1) { perror("open (child)"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } printf("CHILD: child_mem_fd: %d\n", child_mem_fd); if (lseek(child_mem_fd, stack_start, SEEK_SET) == (off_t)-1) { perror("lseek"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } if (read(child_mem_fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer)) != sizeof(buffer)) { perror("read"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } printf("CHILD: new value %d\n", *(int *)(buffer + child_offset)); read(parent_to_child[0], &msg, 1); exit(EXIT_SUCCESS); } else { printf("PARENT (pid %d, child pid %d)\n", getpid(), child_pid); printf("PARENT: child_offset: %lx\n", child_offset); read(child_to_parent[0], &msg, 1); printf("PARENT: message from child: %d\n", msg); snprintf(child_path, 0x20, "/proc/%d/mem", child_pid); printf("PARENT: child_path: %s\n", child_path); child_mem_fd = open(path, O_RDONLY); if (child_mem_fd == -1) { perror("open (child)"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } printf("PARENT: child_mem_fd: %d\n", child_mem_fd); if (lseek(child_mem_fd, stack_start, SEEK_SET) == (off_t)-1) { perror("lseek"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } if (read(child_mem_fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer)) != sizeof(buffer)) { perror("read"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } printf("PARENT: new value %d\n", *(int *)(buffer + child_offset)); close(child_mem_fd); printf("ENDING CHILD PROCESS.\n"); write(parent_to_child[1], &msg, 1); if (waitpid(child_pid, &status, 0) == -1) { perror("waitpid"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } } } int main(void) { arg_t arg; arg.a = 42; printf("In main: address of arg.a: %p\n", &arg.a); explore_proc_mem(&func1, &arg.a); return EXIT_SUCCESS; } This program produces the output below. Notice that the value of a (boldfaced) differs between parent's and child's reading of the /proc/child_pid/mem file. In main: address of arg.a: 0x7ffffe1964f0 Stack_start: 7ffffe196000 Address of arg_ptr-a: 0x7ffffe1964f0 PARENT (pid 20376, child pid 20377) PARENT: child_offset: 4f0 CHILD (pid 20377, parent pid 20376). func1: old value: 42 func1: address: 0x7ffffe1964f0 func1: new value: 53 PARENT: message from child: 1 CHILD: child_mem_fd: 4 PARENT: child_path: /proc/20377/mem CHILD: new value 53 PARENT: child_mem_fd: 7 PARENT: new value 42 ENDING CHILD PROCESS.

    Read the article

  • Pipe overwrites buffer, don't know how to overcome

    - by Kalec
    I use a simple pipe. I read with a while, 1 char at a time, I think every time I read a char I overwrite something #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #include <string.h> int main () { int pipefd[2]; int cpid; char buf[31]; if (pipe(pipefd) == -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE) } cpid = fork(); if (cpid == -1) P perror("cpid"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } if (cpid == 0) { // child reads from pipe close (pipefd[1]); // close unused write end while (read (pipefd[0], &buf, 1)>0); printf ("Server receives: %s", buf); close (pipefd[0])l exit (EXIT_SUCCESS); } else { // parent writes to pipe close (pipefd[0]); // closing unused read end; char buf2[30]; printf("Server transmits: "); scanf ("%s", buf2); write (pipefd[1], buf2, strlen(buf2)+1); close(pipefd[1]); wait(NULL); exit(EXIT_SUCCESS); } return 0; } For example, if I input: "Flowers" it prints F and then ~6 unprintable characters

    Read the article

  • Variable modification in a child process

    - by teaLeef
    I am working on Bryant and O'Hallaron's Computer Systems, A Programmer's Perspective. Exercise 8.16 asks for the output of a program like (I changed it because they use a header file you can download on their website): #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #include <errno.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <string.h> int counter = 1; int main() { if (fork() == 0){ counter--; exit(0); } else{ Wait(NULL); printf("counter = %d\n", ++counter); } exit(0); } I answered "counter = 1" because the parent process waits for its children to terminate and then increments counter. But the child first decrements it. However, when I tested the program, I found that the correct answer was "counter = 2". Is the variable "counter" different in the child and in the parent process? If not, then why is the answer 2?

    Read the article

  • can't read from stream until child exits?

    - by BobTurbo
    OK I have a program that creates two pipes - forks - the child's stdin and stdout are redirected to one end of each pipe - the parent is connected to the other ends of the pipes and tries to read the stream associated with the child's output and print it to the screen (and I will also make it write to the input of the child eventually). The problem is, when the parent tries to fgets the child's output stream, it just stalls and waits until the child dies to fgets and then print the output. If the child doesn't exit, it just waits forever. What is going on? I thought that maybe fgets would block until SOMETHING was in the stream, but not block all the way until the child gives up its file descriptors. Here is the code: #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { FILE* fpin; FILE* fpout; int input_fd[2]; int output_fd[2]; pid_t pid; int status; char input[100]; char output[100]; char *args[] = {"/somepath/someprogram", NULL}; fgets(input, 100, stdin); // the user inputs the program name to exec pipe(input_fd); pipe(output_fd); pid = fork(); if (pid == 0) { close(input_fd[1]); close(output_fd[0]); dup2(input_fd[0], 0); dup2(output_fd[1], 1); input[strlen(input)-1] = '\0'; execvp(input, args); } else { close(input_fd[0]); close(output_fd[1]); fpin = fdopen(input_fd[1], "w"); fpout = fdopen(output_fd[0], "r"); while(!feof(fpout)) { fgets(output, 100, fpout); printf("output: %s\n", output); } } return 0; }

    Read the article

  • Should I fork for a major re-write that uses a small amount of the original code?

    - by It'sNotALie.
    I'm writing a library. It's a completely rewritten version of another one, to suit my needs (PCL compatibility, mainly). However, the API will be completely rewritten, as I'll need to change a lot of stuff around for PCL compliance. Also, as it is a rewrite, I won't be able to just start from the library and just change it bit by bit, as I typically see with forks. I tried that, but it just didn't work. So what should I do? Should I fork here or should I make a new library?

    Read the article

  • Websockify to wrap a forking server

    - by Gurjeet Singh
    I came across Websockify [1] and the accompanying Websock client-side javascript library. AIUI from the Wrap a Programsection in README, Websockify can help you launch a TCP server and rebind its port so that incoming Websockets-based communication is parsed and forwarded to the server on the proper (rebinded) port. My question is, can this mechanism be used to wrap a server that forks its children which in turn communicate with the client on a different port. Specifically, I am interested in websockifying a Postgres server, which typically listens on port 5432 and for a new incoming connection it forks a child which serves all future request from that client. (If it helps, Oracle RDBMS and many other servers, RDBMS or not, also use similar method.) [1] https://github.com/kanaka/websockify

    Read the article

  • PHP forking and mysql database connection problem

    - by user298819
    I am now trying to do forking in php. I would like to do some query and update in child process.. the problem is that whenever a child process finish, it close the connection which makes the other queries fail. The following is my sample code!! #!/usr/local/bin/php <?php set_time_limit(0); # forever program! $db = mysql_connect("server","user","pwd"); mysql_select_db("schema",$db); $sql = "query"; $res = mysql_query($sql,$db); while($rows = mysql_fetch_array($res)) { $rv = pcntl_fork(); if($rv == -1){ echo "forking failed"; }elseif($rv){ echo "parent process $rv\n"; $db = mysql_connect("192.168.8.112","zwmuser","zwmuser",true); mysql_select_db("schema",$db); }else{ echo "child process $rv\n"; $sql1 = "another query"; $res1 = mysql_query($sql1,$db); while($messages = mysql_fetch_array($res1)) { $sql2 = "update query"; mysql_query($sql2,$db); } exit(0); //it terminates both child process and mysql connection! } } ?>

    Read the article

  • What's the right way to kill child processes in perl before exiting?

    - by rarbox
    I'm running an IRC Bot (Bot::BasicBot) which has two child processes running File::Tail but when exiting, they don't terminate. So I'm killling them using Proc::ProcessTable like this before exiting: my $parent=$$; my $proc_table=Proc::ProcessTable->new(); for my $proc (@{$proc_table->table()}) { kill(15, $proc->pid) if ($proc->ppid == $parent); } It works but I get this warning: 14045: !!! Child process PID:14047 reaped: 14045: !!! Child process PID:14048 reaped: 14045: !!! Your program may not be using sig_child() to reap processes. 14045: !!! In extreme cases, your program can force a system reboot 14045: !!! if this resource leakage is not corrected. What else can I do to kill child processes? The forked process is created using the forkit method in Bot::BasicBot.

    Read the article

  • How can I redirect the output of Perl's system() to a filehandle?

    - by syker
    With the open command in Perl, you can use a filehandle. However I have trouble getting back the exit code with the open command in Perl. With the system command in Perl, I can get back the exit code of the program I'm running. However I want to just redirect the STDOUT to some filehandle (no stderr). My stdout is going to be a line-by-line output of key-value pairs that I want to insert into a mao in perl. That is why I want to redirect only my stdout from my Java program in perl. Is that possible? Note: If I get errors, the errors get printed to stderr. One possibility is to check if anything gets printed to stderr so that I can quite the Perl script.

    Read the article

  • git workflow incorporating many, but not all commits from many forks

    - by becomingGuru
    I have a git repo. It has been forked several times and many independent commits are made on top of it. Everything normal, like what happens in many github hosted projects. Now, what exact workflow should I follow, if I want to see all that commits individually and apply the ones I like. The workflow I followed, which is not the optimal is to create a branch of the name github-username and merge the changes into my master and undo any changes in the commit I dont need manually (there are not many, so it worked). What I want is the ability to see all commits from different forks individually and cherry pick and apply them on top of my master. What is the workflow to follow for that? And what gui (gitk?) enables me to see all different individual commits. I realize that merge should be a primary part of the workflow and not cherry-pick as it creates a different commit (from git's point of view). Even rebasing other's changes on top of mine might not preserve the history on the graph to indicate that it is his commits I have rebased. So then, How do I ignore just a few commits from a lot of them? I think github should have a "apply this commit on top of my master" thing in their graph after each commit node; so I can just pull it, after doing all that.

    Read the article

  • How to "signal" interested child processes (without signals)?

    - by Teddy
    I'm trying to find a good and simple method to signal child processes (created through SocketServer with ForkingMixIn) from the parent process. While Unix signals could be used, I want to avoid them since only children who are interested should receive the signal, and it would be overkill and complicated to require some kind of registration mechanism to identify to the parent process who is interested. (Please don't suggest threads, as this particular program won't work with threads, and thus has to use forks.)

    Read the article

  • Monitor memory usage of child process

    - by Omry
    I have a Linux daemon that forks a few children and monitors them for crashes (restarting as needed). It will be great if the parent could monitor the memory usage of child processes - to detect memory leaks and restart child processes when the go beyond a certain size. How can I do this?

    Read the article

  • How to kill all subprocesses of shell?

    - by depesz
    I'm writing bash script, which does several thing. In the beginning it starts several monitor scripts, each of them runs some other tools. At the end of my main script, I would like to kill all things that spawned from my shell. So, it might looks like this: #!/bin/bash some_monitor1.sh & some_monitor2.sh & some_monitor3.sh & do_some_work ... kill_subprocesses The thing is that most of these monitors spawn their own subprocesses, so doing (for example): killall some_monitor1.sh will not always help. Any other way to handle this situation?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >