Search Results

Search found 13160 results on 527 pages for 'response redirect'.

Page 5/527 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

• Redirect an Apache2 SSL VirtualHost with mod_alias

  - by Jeff

  I want to make sure there aren't any odd behaviors that I don't know about when redirecting a SSL VirtualHost with mod_alias Redirect as outlined by Apache here. My code seems to work, but since SSL virtual hosts are restricted to just one IP address, I want to make sure there aren't any problems eluding me. Explicitly not using TLS. I'm stuck with Apache 2.2 for now. <VirtualHost *:443> ServerName example.com SSLEngine On Redirect 301 / https://www.example.com/ </VirtualHost> <VirtualHost *:443> ServerName www.example.com SSLEngine On # Do stuff # </VirtualHost> So I guess my question is, should SSL VirtualHost redirection with mod_alias Redirect work the same as non-SSL redirection?

  Read the article

• Changing Servers - Redirect to new IP = No Downtime?

  - by Denis Pshenov

  I am changing servers of my website. The IP of old server cannot be moved to the new one. To have no downtime I am planing to do the following, please someone confirm it will work: Setup the new server and listen on the new IP Old server redirect all traffic to the new IP Change DNS records to point to the new IP My logic tells me that when I redirect to the new IP from my old box, the user will not see the domain name in the browser but will see the new IP. Is there a way to redirect to the new IP and send along the HOSTNAME with it so that the user will see the domain name in the browser? Im doing this because the site is in constant use and simply changing DNS settings won't do as database won't be synced between the new and old servers during propagation.

  Read the article

• Apache Redirect from https to https

  - by Nikolaos Kakouros

  I am trying to redirect without a rewrite rule from eg https://www.domain.com to https://www.domain.net . I have a wildcard certificate for *.domain.net . This yields the following warning in my error_log [warn] RSA server certificate wildcard CommonName (CN) `*.domain.net' does NOT match server name!? This makes sense and I understand why the warning. I would like to ask if there is a way to use the Redirect directive to accomplish the above without the warnings. Here is my virtual hosts in ssl.conf: <VirtualHost *:443> SSLEngine on ServerName www.domain.net DocumentRoot /var/www/html/domain SSLOptions -FakeBasicAuth -ExportCertData +StrictRequire +OptRenegotiate -StdEnvVars SSLStrictSNIVHostCheck off </VirtualHost> <VirtualHost *:443> SSLEngine on ServerName www.domain.com ServerAlias www.domain.info Redirect permanent / https://www.domain.net </VirtualHost> Also, if there is a solution, can it be used for redirection from htps://domain.com to htps://www.domain.com? Thanks a lot!

  Read the article

• Nginx redirect one domain to another

  - by Bob

  Hello, I have two domain's set up on my server. Domain 1 is configured with google apps so that mail.domain1.com goes to google's mail. However, I would like domain1.com to redirect to domain2.com. Currently in my nginx.conf file I had server { listen 80; server_name domain2.com .domain1.com; rewrite ^/(.*) http://domain2.com permanent; root /home/demo/apps/cjl/public; passenger_enabled on; rails_spawn_method smart; } When I did this Firefox popped up a "Redirect not configured correctly" error and said that it thought that the redirect would create a never ending loop. I'm wondering how to set this up and any help would be appreciated. Thank you!

  Read the article

• htaccess redirect from wordpress page to a php page

  - by JustAnil

  I have recently had to change a URL on a website (in PHP on Apache). The old URL is: http://content.mywebsite.org.uk/hidden/discounts/ When a user visits the above link. The new URL is: http://www.mywebsite.org.uk/charity_benefits.php I have tried variants of the following (and some others), but its just not working for me. RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/hidden/discounts/$ [NC] RewriteRule ^/hidden/discounts/$ /charity_benefits.php [R=302,L,NC] I need the redirect to redirect to www mywebsite.org.uk. (Notice the www! Its important!). So basically, a simple redirect from the old page to the new page. (Which are on different subdomains (OLD: content., NEW: www.) which are hosted on the same server).

  Read the article

• Iptables REDIRECT + openvpn problem

  - by Emilio

  I want to redirect connection to port 22 to my openvpn binded port, on 60001. Openvpn is running on server on 60001 server:~$ sudo netstat -apn | grep openvpn udp 0 0 67.xx.xx.137:60001 0.0.0.0:* 4301/openvpn I redirect on server port 22 to 60001 server:~$ sudo iptables -F -t nat server:~$ sudo iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -p udp --dport 22 -j REDIRECT --to-ports 60001 I start openvpn client (openvpn.conf is correct, it works with remote IP 22 replaced with remote IP 60001) client:~$ ./openvpn openvpn.conf Tue Apr 27 00:42:50 2010 OpenVPN 2.1.1 i686-pc-linux-gnu [SSL] [EPOLL] built on Mar 23 2010 Tue Apr 27 00:42:50 2010 UDPv4 link local (bound): [undef]:1194 Tue Apr 27 00:42:50 2010 UDPv4 link remote: 67.xx.xx.137:22 Tue Apr 27 00:42:52 2010 read UDPv4 [ECONNREFUSED]: Connection refused (code=111) Tue Apr 27 00:42:55 2010 read UDPv4 [ECONNREFUSED]: Connection refused (code=111) ... It doesn't connect. iptables shows requests from client to server but no answers. What's wrong with it?

  Read the article

• Migrating domains - 301 Redirect of all contents of directory

  - by Trufa

  I need to do a 301 redirect with apache since I'm migrating domains. What I would need to do is the following, from certain directories, redirect all of it's content to a different damin (where the file already exists). Let's say I have one.com/files/something.doc or one.com/files/other.php I have already "copied" or "backed up" all the contents of the directory, so the following already exist: two.com/old/files/something.doc and two.com/old/files/other.php So I would just need to redirect anything in the directory "files" (or whatever). I hope the question is clear enough, if not please ask for any clarification needed!! Thanks in advance!!

  Read the article

• .htaccess redirect not preserving http_referer header

  - by CodeToaster

  We're merging with another company, and we want to redirect content from their (Apache) website to our (IIS) site. When traffic arrives at our site, we inspect the HTTP_REFERER, and if the visitor was just redirected from the company's site that we just merged with, they'll be presented with a "splash" page announcing the merger. I've added the line... Redirect / http://www.oursite.com/ ...to their .htaccess, which works fine, except that when the browser is redirected it doesn't send the HTTP_REFERER header. I've tried redirecting with redirect codes 301, 302 and 307 (the default, I believe, is 302) and all have the same effect (redirects fine, but no HTTP_REFERER). Can anyone provide some insight into why HTTP_REFERER wouldn't be included?

  Read the article

• request response with activemq - always send double response.

  - by Chris Valley

  Hi, I'm new at activeMq. I tried to create a simple request response like this. public Listener(string destination) { // set factory ConnectionFactory factory = new ConnectionFactory(URL); IConnection connection; try { connection = factory.CreateConnection(); connection.Start(); ISession session = connection.CreateSession(); // create consumer for designated destination IMessageConsumer consumer = session.CreateConsumer(new Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ.Commands.ActiveMQQueue(destination)); consumer.Listener += new MessageListener(consumer_Listener); Console.ReadLine(); } catch (Exception ex) { Console.WriteLine(ex.ToString()); throw new Exception("Exception in Listening ", ex); } } The OnMessage static void consumer_Listener(IMessage message) { IConnectionFactory factory = new ConnectionFactory("tcp://localhost:61616/"); using (IConnection connection = factory.CreateConnection()) { //Create the Session using (ISession session = connection.CreateSession()) { //Create the Producer for the topic/queue // IMessageProducer prod = session.CreateProducer(new Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ.Commands.ActiveMQTempQueue(message.NMSDestination)); IMessageProducer producer = session.CreateProducer(message.NMSDestination); // Create Response // IMessage response = session.CreateMessage(); ITextMessage response = producer.CreateTextMessage("Replied from VS2010 Test"); //response.NMSReplyTo = new Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ.Commands.ActiveMQQueue("testQ1"); response.NMSCorrelationID = message.NMSCorrelationID; if (message.NMSReplyTo != null) { producer.Send(message.NMSReplyTo, response); Console.WriteLine("Receive: " + ((ITextMessage)message).NMSCorrelationID); Console.WriteLine("Received from : " + message.NMSDestination.ToString()); Console.WriteLine("----------------------------------------------------"); } } } } Every time i tried to send a request to the listener, the response always send repeatedly. The first response will have NMSReplyTo properties while the other not. My workaround to stop this situation by cheking the NMSReplyTo properties if (message.NMSReplyTo != null) { producer.Send(message.NMSReplyTo, response); Console.WriteLine("Receive: " + ((ITextMessage)message).NMSCorrelationID); Console.WriteLine("Received from : " + message.NMSDestination.ToString()); Console.WriteLine("----------------------------------------------------"); } In my understanding, this happened because there was a circular send response in the listener to the same Queue. Could you guys help me how to fix this? Many Thanks, Chris

  Read the article

• AJAX response not valid in C++ but Apache

  - by fehergeri

  I want to make a server written in C++ to power my game. I learned the basics of sockets and wrote a basic chat program that worked well. Now I want to create an HTTP server like Apache, but only for the AJAX request-response part. I think just for the beginning i copied one Apache response text, and i sent the exact response with the C++ server program. The problem that is that the browser (Firefox) connnects to the apache and everything works fine, except all of the requests get a correct response. But if i send this with the C++ client, then FireBug tells me that the response status is OK (200) but there is no actual response text. (How is this possible?) This response-text is exactly the same what apache sends. I made a bit-bit comparison and they were the same. The php file wich is the original response <?php echo "AS";echo rand(0,9); ?> And the origional source code: Socket.h http://pastebin.com/bW9qxtrR Socket.cpp http://pastebin.com/S3c8RFM7 main.cpp http://pastebin.com/ckExuXsR index.html http://pastebin.com/mcfEEqPP < this is the requester file. ajax.js http://pastebin.com/uXJe9hVC benchmark.js http://pastebin.com/djSYtKg9 jQuery is not needed. The main.cpp there is lot of trash code like main3 and main4 functions, these do not affect the result. I know that the response stuff in the C++ code is not really good because the connection closing is not the best; I will fix that later now I want to send a success response first. UPDATE: now i tested today a lot again and i find out there is no problem with the socket. I used the fiddler program to capture the the good answer and to capture the bad. They were the same. After this i turned off my socket application, and forced fiddler to auto respond, and the answer from the 'bad' answer still bat. So after that i replaced the bad with the good and nothing happedned. The bad answer with the good text still bad on the :8888 port but the other on the original :80 port was good, but they were absolutly the same and the same program sended it (fiddler) i think there is something missing if the response is not on the same server address (even not the same port). UPDATE: oh my god! i cant send ajax request to a remote server. now i know this.

  Read the article

• java servlet:response.sendRedirect() not giving illegal state exception if called after commit of re

  - by sahil garg

  after commit of response as here redirect statement should give exception but it is not doing so if this redirect statemnet is in if block.but it does give exception in case it is out of if block.i have shown same statement(with marked stars ) at two places below.can u please tell me reason for it. protected void doPost(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response) throws ServletException, IOException { // TODO Auto-generated method stub synchronized (noOfRequests) { noOfRequests++; } PrintWriter pw=null; response.setContentType("text/html"); response.setHeader("foo","bar"); //response is commited because of above statement pw=response.getWriter(); pw.print("hello : "+noOfRequests); //if i remove below statement this same statement is present in if block.so statement in if block should also give exception as this one do, but its not doing so.why? ***response.sendRedirect("http://localhost:8625/ServletPrc/login% 20page.html"); if(true) { //same statement as above ***response.sendRedirect("http://localhost:8625/ServletPrc/login%20page.html"); } else{ request.setAttribute("noOfReq", noOfRequests); request.setAttribute("name", new Name().getName()); request.setAttribute("GmailId",this.getServletConfig().getInitParameter("GmailId") ); request.setAttribute("YahooId",this.getServletConfig().getInitParameter("YahooId") ); RequestDispatcher view1=request.getRequestDispatcher("HomePage.jsp"); view1.forward(request, response); } }

  Read the article

• LiteSpeed enable Access-Control-Allow-Origin (no response header on CORS request)

  - by Joe Coder Guy

  Seriously, I can't find a single page discussing this for litespeed. Using this format in the htaccess "Header set Access-Control-Allow-Origin http://aSite.com" (and https) sends the setting in the http response header, but I still get the "XMLHttpRequest cannot load https://aSite.com/aFile.php. Origin aSite.com is not allowed by Access-Control-Allow-Origin" error when trying to access https from http origin. Also, I receive no response header for https, only that message shows up in Chrome. Is the server still blocking it even though I've sent the proper headers? I read elsewhere that it helps to add these terms Access-Control-Allow-Headers X-Requested-With Access-Control-Allow-Methods OPTIONS, GET, POST Access-Control-Allow-Headers Content-Type, Depth, User-Agent, X-File-Size, X-Requested-With, If-Modified-Since, X-File-Name, Cache-Control but I don't see these in my headers. Using these, my PHP files aren't even reached (because they register no errors or anything), so it looks like it comes from the server only, but what do I know. Thanks in advance! Update Since no response header, Prashant seems to suggest it's a server issue in his error since it worked on another server. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11953132/no-response-obtained-while-implementing-cors Anyone know how to flip this switch? Headers work now Bad litespeed format. Should look like this. Still being denied though. Header set Access-Control-Allow-Headers X-Requested-With Header set Access-Control-Allow-Methods OPTIONS Header set Access-Control-Allow-Methods GET Header set Access-Control-Allow-Methods POST Header set Access-Control-Allow-Headers Content-Type Header set Access-Control-Allow-Headers Depth Header set Access-Control-Allow-Headers User-Agent Header set Access-Control-Allow-Headers X-File-Size Header set Access-Control-Allow-Headers X-Requested-With Header set Access-Control-Allow-Headers If-Modified-Since Header set Access-Control-Allow-Headers X-File-Name Header set Access-Control-Allow-Headers Cache-Control

  Read the article

• FTP timing out after login

  - by Imran

  For some reasons I cant access any of my accounts on my dedicated server via FTP. It simply times out when it tried to display the directories. Heres a log from FileZila... Status: Resolving address of testdomain.com Status: Connecting to 64.237.58.43:21... Status: Connection established, waiting for welcome message... Response: 220---------- Welcome to Pure-FTPd [TLS] ---------- Response: 220-You are user number 3 of 50 allowed. Response: 220-Local time is now 19:39. Server port: 21. Response: 220-This is a private system - No anonymous login Response: 220-IPv6 connections are also welcome on this server. Response: 220 You will be disconnected after 15 minutes of inactivity. Command: USER testaccount Response: 331 User testaccount OK. Password required Command: PASS ******** Response: 230-User testaccount has group access to: testaccount Response: 230 OK. Current restricted directory is / Command: SYST Response: 215 UNIX Type: L8 Command: FEAT Response: 211-Extensions supported: Response: EPRT Response: IDLE Response: MDTM Response: SIZE Response: REST STREAM Response: MLST type*;size*;sizd*;modify*;UNIX.mode*;UNIX.uid*;UNIX.gid*;unique*; Response: MLSD Response: ESTP Response: PASV Response: EPSV Response: SPSV Response: ESTA Response: AUTH TLS Response: PBSZ Response: PROT Response: 211 End. Status: Connected Status: Retrieving directory listing... Command: PWD Response: 257 "/" is your current location Command: TYPE I Response: 200 TYPE is now 8-bit binary Command: PASV Response: 227 Entering Passive Mode (64,237,58,43,145,153) Command: MLSD Response: 150 Accepted data connection Response: 226-ASCII Response: 226-Options: -a -l Response: 226 18 matches total Error: Connection timed out Error: Failed to retrieve directory listing I have restarted the FTP service serveral times but still It doesnt loads. I only have this problem when my server is reaching it peak usage which is still only 1.0 (4 cores), 40% of 4GB ram. The ftp connections isnt maxed out because only me and my colleague have access to FTP on the server.

  Read the article

• 301 redirect: Is this good or bad for 2 domains?

  - by Tim

  Since i couldn't find any appropriate answer to my specific question, I wanted to ask you. I've read alot of things about the 301-redirect for moving pages and so on. A customer of mine has booked a new domain last year for better search results (he included his main keyword into the domain. Before he had only a domain with his business name, which had nothing to say about what he does). I told him, that he should do a 301-redirect so he doesn't loose his position in Google and to redirect all new customers coming from the old domain to the new domain. After about one year where his site hat a good amount of traffic the search results of Google for his keywords are getting more worse. Since he didn't maintain his website (no new content, bad content on all pages and so on) I assumed this would be the problem. He gave his website to another company which also makes websites. They told him, that this 301-redirection is very bad for his website. They removed it, and also updated his content and the template so now he has the same meta keywords on every page (instead of the specific ones I put there before). He also removed the canonical-tag which I placed there to ensure no duplicate content. What I am now afraid of is, that without this redirect Google now will find duplicate content and therefore kick him out of the index, which would be a nightmare, since most of his customers come over his website. I need verification of the fact, that the 301 isn't bad but in fact the correct way of working with 2 domains. If possible with good sources I can point out to him since he don't wants to hear anything about this. If someone also has a few words about the keywords and the canonical-tag I would really appreciate it! Thank you very much!

  Read the article

• 301 redirect, conflicting with RewriteRule

  - by user569711

  We did some maintenance today, and moved our web forums from /forums into the root folder of the domain. We put in a redirect 301 in a .htaccess file: Redirect 301 /forums/ http://www.ourforums.com/ However, we used to have some links that contained duplicate /forums folders. I.e. www.ourforums.com/forums/forums/forum.1 Obviously the redirect from above now leads to /forum.1, which odes not exist. I would like the old link to actually point to www.ourforums.com/boards/forum.1. I attempted to use something like: RewriteRule ^/forums/forums http://www.ourforums.com/boards/ [NC,R=301,L] Regardless of what I tried though, the Redirect seems to supersede any RewriteRules I put in the same file, regardless of whether I place them before the Redirect. Is there any way I can somehow ensure the RewriteRule is handled before the Redirect?

  Read the article

• Redirect request from https domain to https subdomain with only one certificate

  - by Sean K.

  I'm trying to redirect users to a subdomain in server2 if they make an https request to server1. I only have one certificate, and that's installed on server2. So for instance, from (server1) https://www.example.com to (server2) https://ssl.example.com My best guess is that I will need a certificate for https://www.example.com as the hostname is encrypted inside the HTTP header so my server won't know to redirect until it's decrypted. However, I'm curious if this is possible without two certificates?

  Read the article

• 301 Redirect and query strings

  - by icelizard

  I am looking to create a 301 redirect based purely on a query string see b OLD URL: olddomain.com/?pc=/product/9999 New URL: newurl.php?var=yup My normal way of doing this would be redirect 301 pc=/product/9999 newurl.php?var=yup But this time I am trying to match a URL that that only contains the domain and a query string... What is the best way of doing this? Thanks

  Read the article

• Apache redirect multiple domain names from https

  - by Cyril N.

  My server distribute two main websites, says : www.google.com & www.facebook.com (yeah I know :p) I want them to be distributed via https. Using Apache, I defined a vhost file in sites-available/enabled containing this : <VirtualHost *:80> ServerName google.com Redirect / https://www.google.com/ </VirtualHost> <VirtualHost *:80> ServerName facebook.com Redirect / https://www.facebook.com/ </VirtualHost> <VirtualHost *:80> DocumentRoot /srv/www/google/www/ ServerName www.google.com ServerAlias www.facebook.com <Directory ... /> # Google & Facebook points to the same directory (crazy right ?) # Next of the config </VirtualHost> <VirtualHost *:443> SSLEngine On SSLCertificateFile /path/to/google.crt SSLCertificateKeyFile /path/to/google.key DocumentRoot "/srv/www/google/www/" ServerName www.google.com <Directory .../> # Next of the config </VirtualHost> <VirtualHost *:443> SSLEngine On SSLCertificateFile /path/to/facebook.crt SSLCertificateKeyFile /path/to/facebook.key DocumentRoot "/srv/www/google/www/" ServerName www.facebook.com <Directory .../> # Next of the config </VirtualHost> If I access to https://www.google.com, the httpS works correctly If I access to https://www.facebook.com, the httpS works correctly. If I access to http://www.google.com, the http works correctly # Without https ! If I access to http://www.facebook.com, the http works correctly # Without https ! BUT : If I access to https://facebook.com, it fails saying that the SSL connection is not what expected : Google.com instead of facebook.com Based on my configuration file, I understand why, so I tried to add : <VirtualHost *:443> SSLEngine On ServerName facebook.com Redirect / https://www.facebook.com/ </VirtualHost> But then, I can't even access facebook.com nor www.facebook.com via http/https. So my question is quite simple : how can I redirect all https access to facebook.com (and eventually all sub facebooks : facebook.fr, www.facebook.fr, etc) to www.facebook.com (redirecting to www domain) in HTTPS ? Thanks for your help ! :)

  Read the article

• Redirect all traffic to specified hosts behind NAT

  - by biesiad

  Is there a possibility to redirect all traffic to specified hosts behind NAT? For example i have a server, a domain "mydomain.com" and 3 hosts behind NAT. I wish to configure 3 subdomains: host1.mydomain.com host2.mydomain.com host2.mydomain.com and each of them to redirect all ports to specified host in local net. That redirection should provide funcionality like this: http://host1.mydomain.com (can be achieved using apache) ssh [email protected] (???) and other protocols on diferent ports Thanks for any help.

  Read the article

• ExpressionEngine Segment Variables Lost on Site Index Page

  - by Jesse Bunch

  Hey Everyone, I've been messing with this for days now and can't seem to figure it out. I am trying to pass a 2nd segment variable to my client's index page. The URL I'm trying is: http://www.compupay.com/site/CSCPA/. The problem is, rather than showing the site's index page with the segment variable of "CSCPA" still in the URL, it shows the index page with no segment variables. Initially, I thought it was a .htaccess problem but I couldn't find anything in it that seemed out of whack. Any ideas? I am posting the .htaccess file so another pair of eyes can see it. Thanks for the help! # -- LG .htaccess Generator Start -- # .htaccess generated by LG .htaccess Generator v1.0.0 # http://leevigraham.com/cms-customisation/expressionengine/addon/lg-htaccess-generator/ # secure .htaccess file <Files .htaccess> order allow,deny deny from all </Files> # Dont list files in index pages IndexIgnore * #URL Segment Support AcceptPathInfo On Options +FollowSymLinks #Redirect old incoming links Redirect 301 /contactus.cfm http://www.compupay.com/about_compupay/contact_us/ Redirect 301 /Internet_Payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/c/online_payroll/ Redirect 301 /Internet_Payroll_XpressPayroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/xpresspayroll/ Redirect 301 /about_compupay.cfm http://www.compupay.com/about_compupay/news/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /news101507.cfm http://www.compupay.com/about_compupay/news/ Redirect 301 /quote.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/get_a_free_quote/ Redirect 301 /solution_finder_sm.cfm http://www.compupay.com/ Redirect 301 /state_payroll/mississippi_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/resource_center/state_resources/ Redirect 301 /state_payroll/washington_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/resource_center/state_resources/ #Redirect for old top linked to pages Redirect 301 /Payroll_Services.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /About_CompuPay.cfm http://www.compupay.com/about_compupay/ Redirect 301 /Partnerships.cfm http://www.compupay.com/business_partner_solutions/ Redirect 301 /about_compupay.cfm?subpage=393 http://www.compupay.com/about_compupay/ Redirect 301 /quote.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/get_a_free_quote/ Redirect 301 /After_Payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /Accountant_Services.cfm http://www.compupay.com/accountant_solutions/ Redirect 301 /careers/careers_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/about_compupay/careers/ Redirect 301 /Industry_Resources.cfm http://www.compupay.com/resource_center/ Redirect 301 /Client_Resources.cfm http://www.compupay.com/resource_center/client_login/ Redirect 301 /client_resources.cfm?subpage=375 http://www.compupay.com/resource_center/client_login/ Redirect 301 /solution_finder_sm.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /Internet_Payroll_PowerPayroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/powerpayroll/ Redirect 301 /Payroll_Outsourcing.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/why_outsource/ Redirect 301 /Phone_Payroll_Fax_Payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/phone_fax_payroll/ Redirect 301 /contactus.cfm http://www.compupay.com/about_compupay/contact_us/ Redirect 301 /state_payroll/iowa_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/resource_center/state_resources/ Redirect 301 /Construction_Payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/specialty_payroll/ Redirect 301 /PC_Payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/c/pc_payroll/ Redirect 301 /state_payroll/washington_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/resource_center/state_resources/ Redirect 301 /Internet_Payroll_XpressPayroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/xpresspayroll/ Redirect 301 /accountant_services.cfm?subpage=404 http://www.compupay.com/accountant_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=361 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=362 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=363 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=364 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=365 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=366 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=367 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=368 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=369 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=416 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /payload_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/payload/ Redirect 301 /payroll_services.cfm?subpage=358 http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /payroll_services.cfm?subpage=399 http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /payroll_services.cfm?subpage=409 http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /payroll_services.cfm?subpage=413 http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /payroll_services.cfm?subpage=418 http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /state_payroll/mississippi_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/resource_center/state_resources/ <IfModule mod_rewrite.c> RewriteEngine On RewriteBase / # Remove the www # RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.(.+)$ [NC] # RewriteRule ^ http://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301] # Force www RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www.compupay.com$ [NC] RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.compupay.com/$1 [R=301,L] # Add a trailing slash to paths without an extension RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(\.[a-zA-Z0-9]{1,5}|/)$ RewriteRule ^(.*)$ $1/ [L,R=301] #Legacy Partner Link Redirect RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} partnerCode=(.*) [NC] RewriteRule compupay_payroll.cfm site/%1? [R=301,L] # Catch any remaining requests for .cfm files RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} \.cfm RewriteRule ^.*$ http://www.compupay.com/ [R=301,L] #Expression Engine RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /index.php?/$1 [L] AcceptPathInfo On </IfModule> # Remove IE image toolbar <FilesMatch "\.(html|htm|php)$"> Header set imagetoolbar "no" </FilesMatch> # enable gzip compression <FilesMatch "\.(js|css|php)$"> SetOutputFilter DEFLATE </FilesMatch> #Deal with ETag <IfModule mod_headers.c> <FilesMatch "\.(ico|flv|jpg|jpeg|png|gif)$"> Header unset Last-Modified </FilesMatch> <FilesMatch "\.(ico|flv|jpg|jpeg|png|gif|js|css|swf)$"> Header unset ETag FileETag None Header set Cache-Control "public" </FilesMatch> </IfModule> <IfModule mod_expires.c> <FilesMatch "\.(ico|flv|jpg|jpeg|png|gif|css|js)$"> ExpiresActive on ExpiresDefault "access plus 1 year" </FilesMatch> </IfModule> #Force Download PDFs <FilesMatch "\.(?i:pdf)$"> ForceType application/octet-stream Header set Content-Disposition attachment </FilesMatch> #Increase Upload Size php_value upload_max_filesize 5M php_value post_max_size 5M # -- LG .htaccess Generator End --

  Read the article

• HTTP response time profiling

  - by Sparsh Gupta

  Hello I have a nginx reverse proxy. The server is close to serving 600-700 requests per second. I have a Munin HTTP load time plugin which is outputting this: http://monitor.wingify.com/munin/visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/lb1.visualwebsiteoptimizer.com-http_loadtime.html Now, the problem is I am seeing some spikes in the graph. Expected response times should always be under 200ms. I am keeping an eye on syslog and messages but I am unable to figure out the actual cause of this. I was wondering if there is any good HTTP response time profiling system which I can install / embed with this nginx server and get a detailed reports / logs on the breakup of time taken by different things and what exactly is the cause of the spikes. The profiling system would also help me understand bottlenecks and how can I further optimize the latency. Most important right now is to investigate the cause of the spikes in the HTTP load time graphs (similar pattern is reported by external monitors - Pingdom) and to fix it to get consistent response times Thanks

  Read the article

• IIS is overriding my response content, if i manually set the Response.StatusCode

  - by Pure.Krome

  Hi Folks, Problem when i manually set the HTTP Status of my Response stream to .. say 404 or 503, IIS renders up the stock IIS content/view, instead of my custom view. When I do this with the Web Development Server (aka. Casinni), it works correctly (ie. my content is displayed and the response.statuscode == my entered data. Is there anyway I can override this behaviour? How To Replicate Make a default ASP.NET MVC1 web app. Add the following route public static void RegisterRoutes(RouteCollection routes) { routes.IgnoreRoute("{resource}.axd/{*pathInfo}"); routes.MapRoute( "Default", "{*catchall}", new { controller = "Home", action = "Index" } ); } Now replace the the HomeController's Index method with... [HandleError] public class HomeController : Controller { public ActionResult Index() { Response.StatusCode = 404; return View(); } } :( Please help!

  Read the article

• Max ping response time?

  - by DougN

  I'm wondering what a maximum (practical) ping response time might be. As far as I know, there isn't a max defined anywhere (TTL, but that's hops, not time). As I think about it, I'm not sure I've ever seen a ping response time of more than a second or so. But as far as I know, there is nothing to stop a remote host from waiting (or being really busy) and not sending the response back for a few seconds. As a simple data point, I just pinged a number of servers around the world and the worst time I could find was 350ms.

  Read the article

• Nginx redirect all request that does not match a file to a php file

  - by cyrbil

  I'm trying to get all request to: http://mydomain.com/downloads/* redirect to http://mydomain.com/downloads/index.php except if the requested file exist in /downloads/ ex: http://mydomain.com/downloads = /downloads/index.php http://mydomain.com/downloads/unknowfile = /downloads/index.php http://mydomain.com/downloads/existingfile = /downloads/existingfile My current problem is I have either the redirection to php working but static files not served or the opposite. Here is my current vhost conf: (which redirect fine but static files are send to php and fail) server { listen 80; ## listen for ipv4; this line is default and implied server_name domain.com; root /data/www; index index.php index.html; location / { try_files $uri $uri/ /index.html; } error_page 404 /404.html; # redirect server error pages to the static page /50x.html error_page 500 502 503 504 /50x.html; location = /50x.html { root /usr/share/nginx/www; } location ^~ /downloads { fastcgi_pass unix:/var/run/php5-fpm.sock; fastcgi_split_path_info ^(.+\.php)(/.+)$; fastcgi_index index.php; include fastcgi_params; try_files $uri @downloads; } location @downloads { rewrite ^ /downloads/index.php; } # pass the PHP scripts to FastCGI server # location ~ \.php$ { try_files $uri =404; fastcgi_split_path_info ^(.+\.php)(/.+)$; fastcgi_pass unix:/var/run/php5-fpm.sock; fastcgi_index index.php; include fastcgi_params; } } Precision: static files are symlinks created by /downloads/index.php Thank you for your help.

  Read the article

• Do I need Response.End() in ASP.Net 2.0

  - by Hamish Grubijan

  Hi, I am just starting with ASP.Net. I copied a ex-co-worker's code (from .Net 1.1 era) and it has a Response.End(); in case of an error. There is also a: catch (Exception ex) { Response.Write(ex.Message); Response.End(); } at the end of Page_Load(object sender, System.EventArgs e) which always appends "Thread was aborted." or something like that at the end. I suspect that this worked differently before, or the error conditions were not tested very well. Anyhow, I was able to stop using Response.End(); in case when I do not like the GET parameters, and use return; instead. It seemed to do the right think in a simple case. Is this Ok in general? There are some problems with the code I copied, but I do not want to do a rewrite; I just want to get it running first and find wrinkles later. The Response.End(); caused a mental block for me, however, so I want to figure it out. I want to keep the catch all clause just in case, at least for now. I could also end the method with: catch (System.Threading.ThreadAbortException) { Response.End(); } catch (Exception ex) { Response.Write(ex.Message); Response.End(); } but that just seems extremely stupid, once you think about all of the exceptions being generated. Please give me a few words of wisdom. Feel free to ask if something is not clear. Thanks! P.S. Ex-coworker was not fired and is a good coder - one more reason to reuse his example.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >