Search Results

Search found 11699 results on 468 pages for 'css selectors'.

Page 50/468 | < Previous Page | 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57  | Next Page >

  • Chrome not displaying Class set by jQuery or a Direct CSS property

    - by user186128
    This might seem like a bit of a design/css question but i really need some help. This is the page http://library.permilia.com/Gavin/version2.0_beta/lead.html It works on every browsers imaginable except chrome. By it works i mean it applies a class .error that sets the borders to 1px solid #f00 which is a red border. In chrome for some reason you cannot change it no matter what! Anybody got any ideas?

    Read the article

  • CSS Unwanted padding in IE using floats.

    - by user564176
    It's been a long day of designing and I ran into a problem today. The website www.dcninc.com/newtest/security_testing.php is a new design I'm working on at work right now. If you view it in Firefox you will notice there is no padding on the 2 right boxes (I did that on purpose to trouble shoot my problem) However if you view that same page in IE, it adds padding to the right side. Here is my CSS and HTML below. http://pastebin.com/hRxZp9ub http://pastebin.com/YwSYn7ti

    Read the article

  • html/css: set div bounding box to window height

    - by noamtm
    It looks like I'm missing something basic. I want a certain DIV to have the height of the window. The effect should be that there's never any need to scroll down. Do I have to use JavaScript? I was told that it's possible with css, but I can't find the relevant property - or I'm doing something wrong.

    Read the article

  • CSS: a:link vs just a (without the :link part)

    - by Rob
    So we're required to use the following order for CSS anchor pseudo-classes a:link { color: red } a:visited { color: blue } a:hover { color: yellow } a:active { color: lime } But my question is why bother with the a:link part? Rather, is there any advantage to the above (other than perhaps clarity) over: a { color:red; } /* notice no :link part */ a:visited { color: blue; } etc.,etc.

    Read the article

  • Magento CSS not Loading in New Template

    - by vulgarbulgar
    I have posted on the template creator's site, as well as Magento support, but no one has responded. The CSS is not loading at all on the custom theme I have installed, which is supposedly compatible with the current version of Magento. You can view the page here: shop.dearearth.net This is a fresh installation of Magento and the theme, with a fresh database. I have a feeling it should be a relatively quick fix. Thanks for looking.

    Read the article

  • Apply css to AREA MAP

    - by PeterCPWong
    I'm created a very large map with many poly areas (over 20 coordinates each) for regions within the map. However, you can't add css to the AREA tag as I was told it's not a visible element. What I want to do is when the user hovers over an area on the map, I want it to be "highlighted" by applying a 1px border to the specific AREA element. Is there a way of doing this? No, I'm not going to resort using rectangles.

    Read the article

  • YUI vs jQuery, for css style layouts

    - by tony
    Hi Complete novice question. I've used jQuery a bit, YUI not at all and know very little about it. I work on a website thats IE specific, we're now looking at making it cross browser. jQuery seems great at hiding the differences between browsers from a javascript point of view. However in terms of css layout is it YUI that I should really be looking at? thanks

    Read the article

  • CSS single property classes

    - by user1490379
    As more presentational html properties get deprecated the natural response for me was to make single property CSS classes such as .text-align-left{text-align:left}. My question is, is this preferred versus inline styles? Stackoverflow actually uses quite a bit of inline styles. PS: I know this isn't really a coding question and it is likely to incite debate but stackoverflow is the largest stack exchange for code and this question does have some use for future individuals.

    Read the article

  • How to make this CSS design of words in headings look clean and well desinged? [closed]

    - by kacalapy
    I am trying to get the lipstick on the pig and not wearing my UI developer hat often is making this impossible. Can someone give me nice alternatives to the code below. this is what i have now. <style> .FirstLetter:first-letter{font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; font-weight: bold;color:White; background:Blue; border:1px black solid; padding-top:8px; padding-left:8px; padding-bottom:3px;} .Spaced{letter-spacing: 5px;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; font-weight: bold;} </style> <div class="FirstLetter Spaced headerFont"> Executive Summary </div> Here is the ugly result of the above code- i am lookign to make the header section look better ONLY that's where the first letter is blue:

    Read the article

  • 3 column layout with css display table, with first row having multiple rows?

    - by Damainman
    I am working on a new website which: Has 3 columns - Each Column being a cell First column has 3 rows (Logo, Nav, icons) - Has a Div with display: table which wraps arround 3 divs with display:table-row. Other two columns only have 1 row. With the middle column being the content area. However since this is my first time using display:table, I am running into some things that aren't so clear to me. I was trying to avoid floating divs. If I need multiple rows with one cell in each row per column, do I embed each cell in a row or just create each row and not declare cells. I understand that browsers automatically create the missing elements but I want to make sure I do this properly to avoid any side effects that might occur due to the browser automatically creating the missing elements. Edit: I think my brain is just over worked, I guess I can accomplish this by just using 3 divs in the first column instead of using a nested table div with the rows. This just popped into my head.

    Read the article

  • css - use universal '*' selector vs. html or body selector?

    - by Michael Durrant
    Applying styles to the body tag will be applied to the whole page, so body { font-family: Verdana } will be applied to the whole page. This could also be done with * {font-family: Verdana} which would apply to all elements and so would seem to have the same effect. I understand the principle that in the first instance the style is being applied to one tag, body for the whole page whereas in the second example the font is being applied against each individual html elements. What I am asking is what is the practical difference in doing that, what are the implications and what is a reason, situation or best practice that leads to using one over another. One side-effect is certainly speed (+1 Rob). I am most interested in the actual reason to choose one over the other in terms of functionality.

    Read the article

  • css & horizontal scrolling

    - by zen
    One of my most favorite websites is that of the Oxford Hotel in Romania. I like the simplicity of the site and how it flows. I am trying to create a similar scrolling effect using jquery and I've been somewhat successful to a point. My trouble is with css... I am not a wizard in that department. Anyway,...my questions! 1. How can I first make sure that the ".box" class will be in the center of the page when the corresponding link is clicked? Right now it positions itself on the left. 2. Then, how can I tweak this code so that the user only can see the width of the screen and not the browser scroller/the rest of my ".box" divs? Refer to the oxford link if you need to see an example of what I'd like to achieve. This is a portion of my current CSS. body { background: #f2f2f2; text-align:left; color:#666; font-size:14px; font-family:georgia, 'time new romans', serif; margin:0 auto; padding:0; } #menu { background: #333333; position: fixed; top: 0px; left: 0; border: 1px solid #000; clear: both; float: left; font-family: helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; text-transform: uppercase; margin: 0; padding: 18px; z-index: 500; filter: alpha(opacity=75); opacity: .75; } #menu ul{ list-style-type: none; margin: 0; padding: 0; } #menu ul li{ list-style-type: none; color: #777; display: inline; margin: 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; } #menu ul li a{ text-decoration: none; list-style-type: none; color: #777; display: inline; margin: 0; padding: 0; } #menu ul li a:hover{ text-decoration: none; list-style-type: none; color: #fff; display: inline; margin: 0; padding: 0; } #container { position: absolute; top: 120px; width: 70000px; margin: 0; padding: 0; } .box { background: white; border: 3px dashed #f2f2f2; width: 600px; float: left; font-size: 10px; line-height: 15px; margin: 0; padding: 5px 30px 30px 30px; }

    Read the article

  • css ul li gap in ie7

    - by Gidon
    I have a css ul li nested menu that works perfectly in ie 8 and firefox but in ie7 it produces a small gap between the elements. this is my css: #nav, #nav ul { margin: 0; padding: 0; list-style-type: none; list-style-position: outside; position:static;/*the key for ie7*/ line-height: 1.5em; } #nav li { float: inherit; position: relative; width: 12em; } #nav ul { position: absolute; width: 12em; top: 1.5em; display: none; left: auto; } #nav a:link, #nav a:active, #nav a:visited { display: block; padding: 0px 5px; border: 1px solid #258be8; /*#333;*/ color: #fff; text-decoration: none; background-color: #258be8; /*#333;*/ } #nav a:hover { background-color: #fff; color: #333; } #nav ul li a { display: block; top: -1.5em; position: relative; width: 100%; overflow: auto; /*force hasLayout in IE7 */ right: 12em; padding:0.5em; } #nav ul ul { position: absolute; } #nav ul li ul { right: 13em; margin: 0px 0 0 10px; top: 0; position: absolute; } #nav li:hover ul ul, #nav li:hover ul ul ul, #nav li:hover ul ul ul ul { display: none; } #nav li:hover ul, #nav li li:hover ul, #nav li li li:hover ul, #nav li li li li:hover ul { display: block; } #nav li { background: url(~/Scripts/ourDDL/ddlArrow.gif) no-repeat center left; } #divHead, #featuresDivHead { padding: 5px 10px; width: 12em; cursor: pointer; position: relative; background-color: #99ccFF; margin: 1px; } /* Holly Hack for IE \*/ * html #nav li { float: left; height: 1%; } * html #nav li a { height: 1%; } /* End */ and here is an example for a menu: <ul id='nav'><li><a href="#">Bookstore Online</a></li> <li><a href="#">Study Resources</a></li> <li><a href="#">Service Information</a></li> <li><a href="#">TV Broadcast</a></li> <li><a href="#">Donations</a></li></ul>

    Read the article

  • complex css image centering help?

    - by Tenshiko
    My problem is a bit more complex than the title says. Sorry, I don't know how to be more specific... I'm working on a website and I came across a part where I should display some thumbnails. The thing is, the thumbnails are not matching in dimensions. (I know, it sounds ridiculous, since this is thumbnails are for, right?) No, there is simply NO WAY to create them in the same dimensions!! I've managed to create a HTML+CSS structure to fix this problem, and the images are not stretching to fit their containers if they are smaller while keeping their aspect ratio. The only issue remaining, is to center the images. Since setting margin to "0 auto" or "auto 0" are not helping, I've tried setting up multiple containers and setting the margins to position the images. This is also not working: if I put a 120x120 picture in a 120x80 inner container, and I set the container's top and left margin to -50%, the margins become -60px both. Can this be fixed? Or is there yet another way to center images? I'm open to any suggestions! HTML: <div id="roll"> <div class="imgfix"> <div class="outer"> <div class="inner"> @if (ImageDimensionHelper.WhereToAlignImg(item.Width, item.Height, 120, 82) == ImgAlign.Width) <!-- ImageDimensionHelper tells me if the image should fit the container with its width or height. I set the class of the img accordingly. --> { <img class="width" src="@Url.Content(item.URL)" alt="@item.Name"/> } else { <img class="height" src="@Url.Content(item.URL)" alt="@item.Name"/> } </div> </div> </div> </div> CSS: .imgfix{ overflow:hidden; } .imgfix .outer { width:100%; height:100%;} .imgfix .inner { width:100%; height:100%; margin-top:-50%; margin-left:-50%; } /*This div (.inner) gets -60px for both margins every time, regardless of the size of itself, or the image inside it*/ #roll .imgfix { width:120px; height:82px; border: 1px #5b91ba solid; } #roll .imgfix .outer { margin-top:41px; margin-left:60px; } /*since I know specificly what these margins should be, I set them explicitly, because 50% got the wrong size.*/ #roll .imgfix img.width { width:120px; height:auto; margin: auto 0; } #roll .imgfix img.height { height:82px; width:auto; margin: 0 auto; }

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57  | Next Page >