Search Results

Search found 10455 results on 419 pages for 'ruby on rails 3 2'.

Page 50/419 | < Previous Page | 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57  | Next Page >

  • Rails: creating a custom data type / creating a shorthand

    - by Shyam
    Hi, I am wondering how I could create a custom data type to use within the rake migration file. Example: if you would be creating a model, inside the migration file you can add columns. It could look like this: def self.up create_table :products do |t| t.column :name, :string t.timestamps end end I would like to know how to create something like this: t.column :name, :my_custom_data_type The reason for this to create for example a "currency" type, which is nothing more than a decimal with a precision of 8 and a scale of 2. Since I use only MySQL, the solution for this database is sufficient enough. Thank you for your feedback and comments!

    Read the article

  • Rails 3.2 Ajax Update Div when Text Field Populated

    - by ctilley79
    In the end I would like a text field that passes a client_id to the partial. I would like to do this asynchronously so the shipment_products partial would dynamically change when the textfield value was updated. What is the best way to do this? In index.html.erb <!-- Text Field Here--> <div id="available_products"> <%= render "shipment_products" %> </div> In _shipment_products.html.erb <div id="shipment_products_container"> <h3>Assign Products to Ship<\h3> <ul class="shipment_products" id="shipment_products"> <% Product.by_client(client_id).each do |product|%> <!-- TextField value passed here --> <%= content_tag_for :li, product, :value => product.id do %> <%= hidden_field_tag("shipment[product_ids][]", product.id) %> <%= product.product_name %> <% end %> <% end %> <\ul> </div> This is similar to what I want in the end.

    Read the article

  • Memcached and Rails Fragment Caching Issue

    - by Michael Waxman
    When I have 2 views that fragment cache the same query BUT display them differently, there is only one fragment and they both display it the same way. Is there any way around this? For example... #views/posts/list - cache(@posts) do - for p in @posts = p.title #views/posts/list_with_images - cache(@posts) do - for p in @posts = p.title = p.content = image_tag(p.image_url) #controllers/posts_controller def list ... @posts = Post.all end def list_with_images ... @posts = Post.all end

    Read the article

  • help with rails render action vs routing

    - by Stacia
    I was using some image cropping example that I found online and now I got confused. There is actually no "crop" method in my controller. Instead (following the guide) I put a render :action => 'cropping', :layout=> "admin" In my create method. That renders a page the view called cropping.html.erb . It works fine but I have no idea how to link or render that page otherwise, like if I wanted to hit a URL directly or press a button to recrop an image. Should I actually create a crop method in my controller and hook it up via routing if I want to be able to do this, or is there a way within my view to link to the same place that renders the cropping action? Sorry about the confusion :) It doesn't help that the first version of the tutorial did have a cropping method and he removed it!! Any explanation on why one method is better over the other would be great. Thanks!!

    Read the article

  • Nasty deep nested loop in Rails

    - by CalebHC
    I have this nested loop that goes 4 levels deep to find all the image widgets and calculate their sizes. This seems really inefficient and nasty! I have thought of putting the organization_id in the widget model so I could just call something like organization.widgets.(named_scope), but I feel like that's a bad short cut. Is there a better way? Thanks class Organization < ActiveRecord::Base ... def get_image_widget_total total_size = 0 self.trips.each do |t| t.phases.each do |phase| phase.pages.each do |page| page.widgets.each do |widget| if widget.widget_type == Widget::IMAGE total_size += widget.image_file_size end end end end end return total_size end ... end

    Read the article

  • Rails - Multiple top level domains and a single session/cookie

    - by Thadius B
    Hello all, I've been struggling with this for quite awhile and haven't been able to find a solution. I need a user to be able to view multiple top level domains with a single login. My understanding is that this needs to be set in environment.rb and called with before_dispatch. This is what I've come up with: require 'activesupport' require 'dispatcher' module ActionController class Dispatcher def set_session_domain ActionController::Base.session_options.update :session_domain => "#{@request.host}" end before_dispatch :set_session_domain end end However, this does not seem to be working when I try and pull the values from session[:session_domain]. Any help is greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Rails find over multiple models

    - by kgb
    I think I'm missing something very obvious and its making my brain hurt. class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :profile class Profile < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :user belongs_to :team I have a partial that loops through the users and print some basic info, I'm using this partial in my team show page. I had originally written this to return users who's profiles were a member of a team. def show @team = Team.find_by_id(params[:id]) @profiles= Profile.find(:all, :conditions => ['team_id = ?', @team.id]) @users = User.find_by_id(@profiles.user_id) end But quickly realized @profiles was an array, and it looks messy as hell. Stuck as to what my find should look like to select all User who have a profile that is a member of a team. The partial that is working elsewhere for displaying users looks like this <% for user in @users%> <table> <tr> <td> <%= image_tag user.profile.picture.url %> </td> <td> <a href="/users/<%= user.id %>"><%= user.login %></a> </td> <td> <%= user.profile.first_name %> <%= user.profile.second_name %> </td> <td> <%= user.profile.status %> </td> </tr> </table> <% end %> Development log output with updated show and relationships Processing TeamsController#show (for 127.0.0.1 at 2010-03-30 22:06:31) [GET] Parameters: {"id"=>"1"} User Load (1.3ms) SELECT * FROM "users" WHERE ("users"."id" = 3) LIMIT 1 Team Load (1.0ms) SELECT * FROM "teams" WHERE ("teams"."id" = 1) Rendering template within layouts/main Rendering teams/show Completed in 75ms (View: 11, DB: 2) | 200 OK [http://localhost/teams/1]

    Read the article

  • How to do case-insensitive order in Rails with postgresql

    - by brad
    I am in the process of switching my development environment from sqlite3 to postgresql 8.4 and have one last hurdle. In my original I had the following line in a helper method; result = Users.find(:all, :order => "name collate NOCASE") which provided a very nice case-insensitive search. I can't replicate this for postgresql. Should be easy - any ideas? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • rails date field format on error

    - by ash34
    Hi, I have an input field that captures a date in my form <%= f.text_field :from_date, :style => 'width:80px;' %> The user enters the date in the following format MM/DD/YYYY. However, when there is a validation error in the model and the form is displayed back to the user with the entered values, the date format is converted to YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS UTC. Where do I format this to show MM/DD/YYYY, when the form is displayed to the user. thanks.

    Read the article

  • check params['Filedata'] in rails.

    - by krunal shah
    How to check that my params['Filedata'] is corrupted or not? I have function it's reading file from params['Filedata'] and writing it to the other file. File.open(upload_file, "wb") { |f| f.write(params['Filedata'].read) } this line working fine for me.. But when i am calling this function with delayed job funtion send_later than I am getting error with params['Filedata'].read.

    Read the article

  • Getting Paperclip to work in Rails

    - by Danny McClelland
    Hi Everyone, I have installed the Paperclip plugin to attempt to upload an avatar for my kase model. For some reason, the select the file button shows, and I can choose a file - but then when I click update the kase - it takes me to the show page, but the missing.png rather than the selected image. kase.rb class Kase < ActiveRecord::Base def self.all_latest find(:all, :order => 'created_at DESC', :limit => 5) end def self.search(search, page) paginate :per_page => 5, :page => page, :conditions => ['name like ?', "%#{search}%"], :order => 'name' end # Paperclip has_attached_file :avatar, :styles => { :medium => "300x300>", :thumb => "100x100>" } end kases_controller.rb # GET /kases/new # GET /kases/new.xml def new @kase = Kase.new respond_to do |format| format.html # new.html.erb format.xml { render :xml => @kase } end end new.html.erb <% content_for :header do -%> Cases <% end -% <% form_for(@kase) do |f| %> <%= f.error_messages %> <ul id="kases_new"> <li> <%= f.file_field :avatar %></li> <li>Job Ref.<span><%= f.text_field :jobno %></span></li> <li>Case Subject<span><%= f.text_field :casesubject %></span></li> <li>Transport<span><%= f.text_field :transport %></span></li> <li>Goods<span><%= f.text_field :goods %></span></li> <li>Date Instructed<span><%= f.date_select :dateinstructed %></span></li> <li>Case Status<span><%= f.select "kase_status", ['Active', 'On Hold', 'Archived'] %> </span></li> <li>Client Company Name<span><%= f.text_field :clientcompanyname %></span></li> <li>Client Company Address<span><%= f.text_field :clientcompanyaddress %></span></li> <li>Client Company Fax<span><%= f.text_field :clientcompanyfax %></span></li> <li>Case Handler Name<span><%= f.text_field :casehandlername %></span></li> <li>Case Handler Tel<span><%= f.text_field :casehandlertel %></span></li> <li>Case Handler Email<span><%= f.text_field :casehandleremail %></span></li> <li>Claimant Name<span><%= f.text_field :claimantname %></span></li> <li>Claimant Address<span><%= f.text_field :claimantaddress %></span></li> <li>Claimant Contact<span><%= f.text_field :claimantcontact %></span></li> <li>Claimant Tel<span><%= f.text_field :claimanttel %></span></li> <li>Claimant Mob<span><%= f.text_field :claimantmob %></span></li> <li>Claimant Email<span><%= f.text_field :claimantemail %></span></li> <li>Claimant URL<span><%= f.text_field :claimanturl %></span></li> <li>Comments<span><%= f.text_field :comments %></span></li> </ul> <div class="js_option"> <%= link_to_function "Show financial options.", "Element.show('finance_showhide');" %> </div> <div id="finance_showhide" style="display:none"> <ul id="kases_new_finance"> <li>Invoice Number<span><%= f.text_field :invoicenumber %></span></li> <li>Net Amount<span><%= f.text_field :netamount %></span></li> <li>VAT<span><%= f.text_field :vat %></span></li> <li>Gross Amount<span><%= f.text_field :grossamount %></span></li> <li>Date Closed<span><%= f.date_select :dateclosed %></span></li> <li>Date Paid<span><%= f.date_select :datepaid %></span></li> </ul> <div class="js_option"> <%= link_to_function "I'm confused! Hide financial options.", "Element.hide('finance_showhide');" %> </div> </div> <p> <%= f.submit "Create" %> </p> <% end %> <%= link_to 'Back', kases_path %> I have tried putting the <%= f.file_field :avatar % in it's own form on the same page, but that didn't make a difference. Thanks in advanced! Thanks, Danny

    Read the article

  • How can I serialize and communicate ActiveRecord instances across identical Rails apps?

    - by Blaine LaFreniere
    The main idea is that I have several worker instances of a Rails app, and then a main aggregate I want to do something like this with the following pseudo pseudo-code posts = Post.all.to_json( :include => { :comments => { :include => :blah } }) # send data to another, identical, exactly the same Rails app # ... # Fast forward to the separate but identical Rails app: # ... # remote_posts is the posts results from the first Rails app posts = JSON.parse(remote_posts) posts.each do |post| p = Post.new p = post p.save end I'm shying away from Active Resource because I have thousands of records to create, which would mean thousands of requests for each record. Unless there is a way to do it all in one request with Active Resource that is simple, I'd like to avoid it. Format doesn't matter. Whatever makes it convenient. The IDs don't need to be sent, because the other app will just be creating records and assigning new IDs in the "aggregate" system. The hierarchy would need to be preserved (E.g. "Hey other Rails app, I have genres, and each genre has an artist, and each artist has an album, and each album has songs" etc.)

    Read the article

  • Rails: Using form tags inside lib

    - by jaycode
    So I have this code inside my lib/ folder: class GlobalConfig::SetHelper def self.yes_no_input(configuration) value = configuration.value name = configuration.name "#{radio_button_tag name, true, (value == true), {:id => "#{name}_yes"}} #{label_tag "#{name}_yes", 'yes'} #{radio_button_tag name, false, (value.blank? or value == false), {:id => "#{name}_no"}} #{label_tag "#{name}_no", 'no'}" end end But it returned: undefined method `radio_button_tag' for GlobalConfig::SetHelper:Class when I run the code. How do I fix this. Anyone? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Rails Multiple Models per Form, Optional FK Association

    - by ckarbass
    Given the following pseudo-code: Company has_many :jobs Job belongs_to :company I'm creating a form to post a new job. In the form, I want to have two fields for an optional company. On submission, if a company was entered, I want to either create or update the company and associate it with the new job. I know if the company exists by searching the companies table for the company's url. Is it possible to do this using form_for, fields_for, and accepts_nested_attributes_for given the company may not exist?

    Read the article

  • Model Validation for record creation in rails

    - by Elliot
    Hey Guys, Lets say the model for books is: created_at user_id (int) author_id (int) genre_id (int) pages (int) I want to let people change the "created_at" field upon record creation. I also want to make sure that a record can't have the exact same created_at, user_id, and author_id as any other record (i.e. each needs its own date). Whats the best to perform this type of validation, and how should I go about doing it? Best, Elliot

    Read the article

  • Dynamic Attachment Size for Paperclip (Rails)

    - by CalebHC
    Is there anyway to have the validates_attachment_size except a dynamic file size limit? Here's an example: class Document < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :folder has_attached_file :document validates_attachment_size :document, :less_than => get_current_file_size_limit private def get_current_file_size_limit 10.megabytes # This will dynamically change end end I've tried this but I keep getting an error saying "unknown method". Lambdas and Procs don't work either. Has anyone ever tried this? Thanks

    Read the article

  • rails arguments to after_save observer

    - by ash34
    Hi, I want users to enter a comma-delimited list of logins on the form, to be notified by email when a new comment/post is created. I don't want to store this list in the database so I would use a form_tag_helper 'text_area_tag' instead of a form helper text_field. I have an 'after_save' observer which should send an email when the comment/post is created. As far as I am aware, the after_save event only takes the model object as the argument, so how do I pass this non model backed list of logins to the observer to be passed on to the Mailer method that uses them in the cc list. thanks

    Read the article

  • Rails preventing duplicates in polymorphic has_many :through associations

    - by seaneshbaugh
    Is there an easy or at least elegant way to prevent duplicate entries in polymorphic has_many through associations? I've got two models, stories and links that can be tagged. I'm making a conscious decision to not use a plugin here. I want to actually understand everything that's going on and not be dependent on someone else's code that I don't fully grasp. To see what my question is getting at, if I run the following in the console (assuming the story and tag objects exist in the database already) s = Story.find_by_id(1) t = Tag.find_by_id(1) s.tags << t s.tags << t My taggings join table will have two entries added to it, each with the same exact data (tag_id = 1, taggable_id = 1, taggable_type = "Story"). That just doesn't seem very proper to me. So in an attempt to prevent this from happening I added the following to my Tagging model: before_validation :validate_uniqueness def validate_uniqueness taggings = Tagging.find(:all, :conditions => { :tag_id => self.tag_id, :taggable_id => self.taggable_id, :taggable_type => self.taggable_type }) if !taggings.empty? return false end return true end And it works almost as intended, but if I attempt to add a duplicate tag to a story or link I get an ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid: Validation failed exception. It seems that when you add an association to a list it calls the save! (rather than save sans !) method which raises exceptions if something goes wrong rather than just returning false. That isn't quite what I want to happen. I suppose I can surround any attempts to add new tags with a try/catch but that goes against the idea that you shouldn't expect your exceptions and this is something I fully expect to happen. Is there a better way of doing this that won't raise exceptions when all I want to do is just silently not save the object to the database because a duplicate exists?

    Read the article

  • Rails: three most recent comments with unique users

    - by Dennis Collective
    what would I put in the named scope :by_unique_users so that I can do Comment.recent.by_unique_users.limit(3), and only get one comment per user? class User has_many :comments end class Comment belongs_to :user named_scope :recent, :order => 'comments.created_at DESC' named_scope :limit, lambda { |limit| {:limit => limit}} named_scope :by_unique_users end on sqlite named_scope :by_unique_user, :group = "user_id" works, but makes it freak out on postgres, which is deployed on production PGError: ERROR: column "comments.id" must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used in an aggregate function

    Read the article

  • Avoiding Duplicate Data in DB (for use with Rails)

    - by ants
    I have five tables that I am trying to get to work nicely together but may need some help. I have three main tables: accounts members and roles. With two join tables account_members and account_member_roles. The accounts and members table are joined by account_members (fk account_id and member_id) table. The other 2 tables are the problem (roles and account_member_roles). A member of an account can have more than one role and I have the account_member_roles (fk account_member_id and role_id) table joining the account_members join table and the roles table. That seems logical but can you have a relationship with a join table? What I'd like to be able to do is when creaeting an account, for instance, I would like @account.save to include the roles and update the account_member_roles table neatly ..... but through the account_members join table. I've tried ..... accept_nested_attributes_for :members, :account_member_roles in the account.rb but I get ..... ActiveRecord::HasManyThroughCantAssociateThroughHasManyReflection (Cannot modify association 'Account#account_member_roles' because the source reflection class 'AccountMemberRole' is associated to 'AccountMember' via :has_many.) upon trying to save a record. Any advice on how I should approach this? CIA -ants

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57  | Next Page >