Search Results

Search found 3266 results on 131 pages for 'san certificate'.

Page 51/131 | < Previous Page | 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58  | Next Page >

  • System Account Logon Failures ever 30 seconds

    - by floyd
    We have two Windows 2008 R2 SP1 servers running in a SQL failover cluster. On one of them we are getting the following events in the security log every 30 seconds. The parts that are blank are actually blank. Has anyone seen similar issues, or assist in tracking down the cause of these events? No other event logs show anything relevant that I can tell. Log Name: Security Source: Microsoft-Windows-Security-Auditing Date: 10/17/2012 10:02:04 PM Event ID: 4625 Task Category: Logon Level: Information Keywords: Audit Failure User: N/A Computer: SERVERNAME.domainname.local Description: An account failed to log on. Subject: Security ID: SYSTEM Account Name: SERVERNAME$ Account Domain: DOMAINNAME Logon ID: 0x3e7 Logon Type: 3 Account For Which Logon Failed: Security ID: NULL SID Account Name: Account Domain: Failure Information: Failure Reason: Unknown user name or bad password. Status: 0xc000006d Sub Status: 0xc0000064 Process Information: Caller Process ID: 0x238 Caller Process Name: C:\Windows\System32\lsass.exe Network Information: Workstation Name: SERVERNAME Source Network Address: - Source Port: - Detailed Authentication Information: Logon Process: Schannel Authentication Package: Kerberos Transited Services: - Package Name (NTLM only): - Key Length: 0 Second event which follows every one of the above events Log Name: Security Source: Microsoft-Windows-Security-Auditing Date: 10/17/2012 10:02:04 PM Event ID: 4625 Task Category: Logon Level: Information Keywords: Audit Failure User: N/A Computer: SERVERNAME.domainname.local Description: An account failed to log on. Subject: Security ID: NULL SID Account Name: - Account Domain: - Logon ID: 0x0 Logon Type: 3 Account For Which Logon Failed: Security ID: NULL SID Account Name: Account Domain: Failure Information: Failure Reason: An Error occured during Logon. Status: 0xc000006d Sub Status: 0x80090325 Process Information: Caller Process ID: 0x0 Caller Process Name: - Network Information: Workstation Name: - Source Network Address: - Source Port: - Detailed Authentication Information: Logon Process: Schannel Authentication Package: Microsoft Unified Security Protocol Provider Transited Services: - Package Name (NTLM only): - Key Length: 0 EDIT UPDATE: I have a bit more information to add. I installed Network Monitor on this machine and did a filter for Kerberos traffic and found the following which corresponds to the timestamps in the security audit log. A Kerberos AS_Request Cname: CN=SQLInstanceName Realm:domain.local Sname krbtgt/domain.local Reply from DC: KRB_ERROR: KDC_ERR_C_PRINCIPAL_UNKOWN I then checked the security audit logs of the DC which responded and found the following: A Kerberos authentication ticket (TGT) was requested. Account Information: Account Name: X509N:<S>CN=SQLInstanceName Supplied Realm Name: domain.local User ID: NULL SID Service Information: Service Name: krbtgt/domain.local Service ID: NULL SID Network Information: Client Address: ::ffff:10.240.42.101 Client Port: 58207 Additional Information: Ticket Options: 0x40810010 Result Code: 0x6 Ticket Encryption Type: 0xffffffff Pre-Authentication Type: - Certificate Information: Certificate Issuer Name: Certificate Serial Number: Certificate Thumbprint: So appears to be related to a certificate installed on the SQL machine, still dont have any clue why or whats wrong with said certificate. It's not expired etc.

    Read the article

  • How do I bypass pkgadd signature verification?

    - by Brian Knoblauch
    Trying to install CollabNet Subversion Client on Solaris x64, but I'm hung up with: ## Verifying signature for signer <Alexander Thomas(AT)> pkgadd: ERROR: Signature verification failed while verifying certificate <subject=Alexander Thomas(AT), issuer=Alexander Thomas(AT)>:<self signed certificate>. Any way to just bypass the certificate check? None of the options listed in the man page seemed appropriate.

    Read the article

  • Exchange 2010 OWA with Client Certificates

    - by Christian
    I have enabled Client Certificate Authentication for Exchange 2010 through IIS7 and the users are prompted to choose their User Certificate when they log in, but they are all then presented with the following error message Request Url: https://<domain_name>:443/owa/ User host address: <server_ip_address> OWA version: 14.1.355.2 Exception Exception type: System.NullReferenceException Exception message: Object reference not set to an instance of an object. Call stack Microsoft.Exchange.Clients.Owa.Core.RequestDispatcher.GetUserIdentities(OwaContext owaContext, OwaIdentity& logonIdentity, OwaIdentity& mailboxIdentity, Boolean& isExplicitLogon, Boolean& isAlternateMailbox, ExchangePrincipal& logonExchangePrincipal) Microsoft.Exchange.Clients.Owa.Core.RequestDispatcher.InternalDispatchRequest(OwaContext owaContext) Microsoft.Exchange.Clients.Owa.Core.RequestDispatcher.DispatchRequest(OwaContext owaContext) Microsoft.Exchange.Clients.Owa.Core.OwaRequestEventInspector.OnPostAuthorizeRequest(Object sender, EventArgs e) System.Web.HttpApplication.SyncEventExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute() System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) The method I followed to enable Certificate authentiaction was from this post: http://www.miru.ch/2011/04/how-to-enable-certificate-based-authentication-on-exchange-2010/ Any ideas? Google isn't being very helpful

    Read the article

  • One domain, dedicated SSL IP on whm

    - by Vanja D.
    It's long, but please read carefully. I am trying to install an SSL certificate on my dedicated server with WHM/cPanel. I have a dedicated IP to use with the SSL certificate. My main domain is example.com (NOT www.example.com), and I have an account and website already running on it. I bought the certificate for the main domain (example.com without www.). I installed the certificate (successfully). I used the example.com domain, the dedicated IP and the same cPanel user which owns example.com (non-ssl) I double checked ConfigServer for port 443 being open. RESULT: https://example.com won't open, ssl check tool returns a "SSL is not configured on this port (443)" error. I have three questions: where did I go wrong, wht did I miss? is it possible to have one domain on two ips (one for http, one for https)? is it possible to have an ssl host with the same user as the regular one?

    Read the article

  • Makecert.exe hangs

    - by Robert
    I was following the steps in Scott Hanselman's blog post describing how to create a certificate authority and code signing certificate for PowerShell scripts. Initially, I created the certificate authority and a personal certifcate and used it to sign a powershell script successfully. All went as described in the blog post. The problem starts (as most do) when I did something that was (probably) stupid, although it seemed reasonable at the time. I wanted to start over and repeat the process again with a clean slate, so from the mmc certificates snap-in console, I deleted the personal certificate and the certificate authority I created previously. After that any time I try to use makecert, (just as I did the first time around), makecert either hangs or faults (which prompts to end or debug). Did I hose something up by deleting via the certificates snap-in? It didn't complain or warn me that it could be potentially hazardous. Is this just coincidence and something else entirely could be hosed? I have Event Log entries from the times when makecert crashed, which all look very similar; here is one: Log Name: Application Source: Application Error Date: 8/5/2009 3:55:04 PM Event ID: 1000 Task Category: (100) Level: Error Description: Faulting application makecert.exe, version 6.0.6000.16384, time stamp 0x4545910b, faulting module ntdll.dll, version 6.0.6002.18005, time stamp 0x49e03821, exception code 0xc0000005, fault offset 0x00067409, process id 0xe58, application start time 0x01ca160efdf30625. Anyone have any ideas as to what exactly caused this and/or what I can do to fix it. I'm on 32-bit Vista Enterprise w/SP2.

    Read the article

  • migrating puppet clients to a new puppet master (old puppet master server gone, only using backup)

    - by user47650
    My puppet master server had a hardware failure, and I have restored to another box. However this box has different hardware and hostname. If I restore the existing /etc/puppet directory to the new server, the puppetmaster will not start with the following error; # puppetmasterd --debug --verbose Could not prepare for execution: Retrieved certificate does not match private key; please remove certificate from server and regenerate it with the current key So what steps do I need to take to allow the new puppetmaster to start, and to generate a new puppetmaster certificate using the old ca.. Also will the puppet clients actually report in to a different puppet server using a server certificate that has been generated with the old CA?

    Read the article

  • OpenSSL response 404 issue on centOS 6

    - by dsp_099
    I followed this tutorial (though it's for 5.2, I figured I'd be alright). The changes I had to make that seemed to have worked: Rename ca.csr to ca.cslr (that's the one the command generated) List it in the ssl.conf as ca.cslr instead of ca.csr I have the following in the httpd.conf <VirtualHost *:80> DocumentRoot /etc/test ServerName site.com </VirtualHost> <VirtualHost *:433> SSLEngine on SSLCertificateFile /etc/pki/tls/certs/ca.crt SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/pki/tls/private/ca.key <Directory /etc/test> AllowOverride All </Directory> DocumentRoot /etc/test ServerName cryptokings.com </VirtualHost> /test contains a folder inside of it, accessible via http://site.com/test/foo, however attempting to access it via https://site.com/test/foo results in warning that the certificate is untrusted (self-signed, no biggie) a 404 error. Chrome's complains about the certificate are the following: The identity of this website has not been verified. • Server's certificate does not match the URL. • Server's certificate is not trusted. I think those warnings are a side-effect of a self-signed certificate - or is the first one something that needs to be addressed? I seem to be able fetch the root page via https just fine though, it shows a standard CentOS setup page. (That said, I haven't added a VirtualHost entry for it so I suppose that makes sense) I think I've made a mistake somewhere during the setup as I'm not too familiar with the process. During setup, I was prompted for a type of password that would be required when apache restarts but running service httpd restart does not seem to prompt me for one. Any help would be appreciated.

    Read the article

  • SSL certificates that works with nginx

    - by jpartogi
    All, After thinking about it, we are planning to buy an SSL certificate. Because an SSL certificate is quite costly, would you be able to share an SSL certificate that works with nginx? I am planning to run Ruby on Rails application. Apache2 will be my last resort. Thank you for sharing. Really appreciate it.

    Read the article

  • Postfix enable SSL 465 failed

    - by user221290
    I have installed the Postfix and enabled SSL/TLS, just tested, I can sent email from port 25, 578, but cannot sent email from port 465, the log is: May 26 17:24:06 mail postfix/smtpd[28721]: SSL_accept:SSLv3 write server hello A May 26 17:24:06 mail postfix/smtpd[28721]: SSL_accept:SSLv3 write certificate A May 26 17:24:06 mail postfix/smtpd[28721]: SSL_accept:SSLv3 write server done A May 26 17:24:06 mail postfix/smtpd[28721]: SSL_accept:SSLv3 flush data May 26 17:24:06 mail postfix/smtpd[28721]: SSL3 alert read:fatal:certificate unknown May 26 17:24:06 mail postfix/smtpd[28721]: SSL_accept:failed in SSLv3 read client certificate A May 26 17:24:06 mail postfix/smtpd[28721]: SSL_accept error from unknown[10.155.36.240]: 0 May 26 17:24:06 mail postfix/smtpd[28721]: warning: TLS library problem: 28721:error:14094416:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:sslv3 alert certificate unknown:s3_pkt.c:1197:SSL alert number 46: May 26 17:24:06 mail postfix/smtpd[28721]: lost connection after CONNECT from unknown[10.155.36.240] May 26 17:24:06 mail postfix/smtpd[28721]: disconnect from unknown[10.155.36.240] My email server is: 10.155.34.117, and email client is: 10.155.36.240, the client error is: Could not connect to SMTP host: 10.155.34.117, port: 465. My Master.cf: smtps inet n - n - - smtpd -o smtpd_tls_wrappermode=yes My main.cf: smtpd_use_tls = yes smtpd_tls_auth_only = no smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/pki/myca/mail.key smtpd_tls_cert_file = /etc/pki/myca/mail.crt smtpd_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/myca/cacert_new.pem smtpd_tls_loglevel = 2 smtpd_tls_received_header = yes smtpd_tls_session_cache_timeout = 3600s smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/etc/postfix/smtpd_scache Seems it's my certificate issue, but I have tried to grant the file many times...I have no idea on this, please help!

    Read the article

  • SQl server 2008 permission and encryption

    - by Paranjai
    i have made columns in some of the tables encrypted in sql server 2008. Now as i am a db owner i have the access to encode and decode the data using the symmetric key and certificate. But some other users have only currently datareader and datawriter rights ,and when they execute any SP referring the logic which uses the key and certificate "User does has not right on the certificate to execute". What rights / exact permission should i grant them just to solve this problem

    Read the article

  • nginx: override global ssl directives for specific servers

    - by alkar
    In my configuration I have placed the ssl_* directives inside the http block and have been using a wildcard certificate certified by a custom CA without any problems. However, I now want to use a new certificate for a new subdomain (a server), that has been certified by a recognized CA. Let's say the TLD is blah.org. I want my custom certificate with CN *.blah.org to be used on all domains except for new.blah.org that will use its own certificate/key pair of files with CN new.blah.org. How would one do that? Adding new ssl_* directives inside the server block doesn't seem to override the global settings.

    Read the article

  • Client-side certificates

    - by walshms
    My company purchased a wildcard certificate from a vendor. This certificate was successfully configured with Apache 2.2 to secure a subdomain. Everything on the SSL side works. Now I'm required to generate x509 client-side certificates to issue for this subdomain. I'm following along this page: (http://www.vanemery.com/Linux/Apache/apache-SSL.html), starting with "Creating Client Certificates for Authentication". I've generated the p12 files and successfully imported them into Firefox. When I browse to the site now, I get an error in FireFox that says "The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading." I think my problem is coming from not signing the client-side correctly. When I sign the client-side certificate, I'm using the PEM file (RapidSSL_CA_bundle.pem) from RapidSSL (who we bought the certificate from) for the -CA argument. For the -CAkey argument, I'm using the private key of the server. Is this correct?

    Read the article

  • Setting up IIS 7.5 for AD Client Certificates for iOS devices

    - by vonsch
    I am working on getting an iPad to auth to an IIS7.5 website using a local certificate mapped to a user in AD. I am not, in any sense of the word, an IIS admin. I essentially need to setup a proof of concept. I believe that this may work, but I just have no idea how to do it. What I have so far is an iPad with a user certificate installed. I have this user certificate added the correlating user account in AD. What I would like is a basic text webpage to load showing the user that it is authenticating. I would like this page to not be viewable unless it is client certificate authenticated. I don't mind doing the legwork, but I really don't know where to begin on the IIS side. Can anyone point me in the right direction?

    Read the article

  • jQuery Autocomplete problem - Shift Key behaves same as Return Key

    - by user237005
    See: http://www.airbnb.com/ In the search bar, start typing "san f" (no quotes, all lowercase), then hit Return (or Enter). "San Francisco" is autocompleted. This is good! Now clear the search field and start over. type "San F" and boom - "San Francisco" is autocompleted as soon as you hit Shift. This is not expected. This happens in FF & Safari, but is untested elsewhere. I've looked through the jQuery Autocomplete Source Code and everything looks normal. Has anyone experienced this before?

    Read the article

  • Why is phpseclib producing incompatible certs?

    - by chacham15
    Why is it that when I try to use a certificate/key pair generated from phpseclib, the OpenSSL server code errors out? Certs/Keys generated from OpenSSL work fine. How do I fix this? Certificate/Key Generation taken straight from phpseclib documentation: <?php include('File/X509.php'); include('Crypt/RSA.php'); // create private key / x.509 cert for stunnel / website $privKey = new Crypt_RSA(); extract($privKey-createKey()); $privKey-loadKey($privatekey); $pubKey = new Crypt_RSA(); $pubKey-loadKey($publickey); $pubKey-setPublicKey(); $subject = new File_X509(); $subject-setDNProp('id-at-organizationName', 'phpseclib demo cert'); //$subject-removeDNProp('id-at-organizationName'); $subject-setPublicKey($pubKey); $issuer = new File_X509(); $issuer-setPrivateKey($privKey); $issuer-setDN($subject-getDN()); $x509 = new File_X509(); //$x509-setStartDate('-1 month'); // default: now //$x509-setEndDate('+1 year'); // default: +1 year $result = $x509-sign($issuer, $subject); echo "the stunnel.pem contents are as follows:\r\n\r\n"; echo $privKey-getPrivateKey(); echo "\r\n"; echo $x509-saveX509($result); echo "\r\n"; ? OpenSSL sample SSL server taken straight from OpenSSL example code: #include <stdio.h #include <unistd.h #include <stdlib.h #include <memory.h #include <errno.h #include <sys/types.h #include <sys/socket.h #include <netinet/in.h #include <arpa/inet.h #include <netdb.h #include <openssl/rsa.h /* SSLeay stuff */ #include <openssl/crypto.h #include <openssl/x509.h #include <openssl/pem.h #include <openssl/ssl.h #include <openssl/err.h #define CHK_NULL(x) if ((x)==NULL) exit (1) #define CHK_ERR(err,s) if ((err)==-1) { perror(s); exit(1); } #define CHK_SSL(err) if ((err)==-1) { ERR_print_errors_fp(stderr); exit(2); } int main (int argc, char *argv[]) { int err; int listen_sd; int sd; struct sockaddr_in sa_serv; struct sockaddr_in sa_cli; size_t client_len; SSL_CTX* ctx; SSL* ssl; X509* client_cert; char* str; char buf [4096]; SSL_METHOD *meth; /* SSL preliminaries. We keep the certificate and key with the context. */ SSL_load_error_strings(); SSLeay_add_ssl_algorithms(); meth = SSLv23_server_method(); ctx = SSL_CTX_new (meth); if (!ctx) { ERR_print_errors_fp(stderr); exit(2); } if (SSL_CTX_use_certificate_file(ctx, argv[1], SSL_FILETYPE_PEM) <= 0) { ERR_print_errors_fp(stderr); exit(3); } if (SSL_CTX_use_PrivateKey_file(ctx, argv[2], SSL_FILETYPE_PEM) <= 0) { ERR_print_errors_fp(stderr); exit(4); } if (!SSL_CTX_check_private_key(ctx)) { fprintf(stderr,"Private key does not match the certificate public key\n"); exit(5); } /* ----------------------------------------------- */ /* Prepare TCP socket for receiving connections */ listen_sd = socket (AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0); CHK_ERR(listen_sd, "socket"); memset (&sa_serv, '\0', sizeof(sa_serv)); sa_serv.sin_family = AF_INET; sa_serv.sin_addr.s_addr = INADDR_ANY; sa_serv.sin_port = htons (1111); /* Server Port number */ err = bind(listen_sd, (struct sockaddr*) &sa_serv, sizeof (sa_serv)); CHK_ERR(err, "bind"); /* Receive a TCP connection. */ err = listen (listen_sd, 5); CHK_ERR(err, "listen"); client_len = sizeof(sa_cli); sd = accept (listen_sd, (struct sockaddr*) &sa_cli, (unsigned int*)&client_len); CHK_ERR(sd, "accept"); close (listen_sd); printf ("Connection from %lx, port %x\n", sa_cli.sin_addr.s_addr, sa_cli.sin_port); /* ----------------------------------------------- */ /* TCP connection is ready. Do server side SSL. */ ssl = SSL_new (ctx); CHK_NULL(ssl); SSL_set_fd (ssl, sd); err = SSL_accept (ssl); CHK_SSL(err); /* Get the cipher - opt */ printf ("SSL connection using %s\n", SSL_get_cipher (ssl)); /* Get client's certificate (note: beware of dynamic allocation) - opt */ client_cert = SSL_get_peer_certificate (ssl); if (client_cert != NULL) { printf ("Client certificate:\n"); str = X509_NAME_oneline (X509_get_subject_name (client_cert), 0, 0); CHK_NULL(str); printf ("\t subject: %s\n", str); OPENSSL_free (str); str = X509_NAME_oneline (X509_get_issuer_name (client_cert), 0, 0); CHK_NULL(str); printf ("\t issuer: %s\n", str); OPENSSL_free (str); /* We could do all sorts of certificate verification stuff here before deallocating the certificate. */ X509_free (client_cert); } else printf ("Client does not have certificate.\n"); /* DATA EXCHANGE - Receive message and send reply. */ err = SSL_read (ssl, buf, sizeof(buf) - 1); CHK_SSL(err); buf[err] = '\0'; printf ("Got %d chars:'%s'\n", err, buf); err = SSL_write (ssl, "I hear you.", strlen("I hear you.")); CHK_SSL(err); /* Clean up. */ close (sd); SSL_free (ssl); SSL_CTX_free (ctx); return 1; } /* EOF - serv.cpp */ This program errors with: (the error is printed out on the call to SSL_write) Connection from 100007f, port a7ff SSL connection using (NONE) Client does not have certificate. Got 0 chars:'' 82673:error:1409E0E5:SSL routines:SSL3_WRITE_BYTES:ssl handshake failure:/SourceCache/OpenSSL098/OpenSSL098-44/src/ssl/s3_pkt.c:539: Here is the relevant code referenced by the error: int ssl3_write_bytes(SSL *s, int type, const void *buf_, int len) { const unsigned char *buf=buf_; unsigned int tot,n,nw; int i; s-rwstate=SSL_NOTHING; tot=s-s3-wnum; s-s3-wnum=0; if (SSL_in_init(s) && !s-in_handshake) { i=s-handshake_func(s); if (i < 0) return(i); if (i == 0) { SSLerr(SSL_F_SSL3_WRITE_BYTES,SSL_R_SSL_HANDSHAKE_FAILURE); return -1; } } ...etc

    Read the article

  • TFS 2010 and SSL Configuration: Part 1 Certificates in Place

    - by Enrique Lima
    What is needed?  For starters, an understanding on the how to properly configure a certificate in IIS. Many people have found challenges in working with certificates in IIS 7 First thing is to get your certificate created, and then proceed to add it to IIS 7 By clicking on Server Certificates, we will get to this And we will be able to see the certificate or certificates installed. What options do we have to get certificates? They can be generated “in-house” or purchase them from certification authorities.  If it is “in-house”, you will those options in the Server Certificates area of IIS Manager.

    Read the article

  • Database Security Events in April

    - by Troy Kitch
    Wed, Apr 18, Executive Oracle Database Security Round Table - Tampa, FL Tue, Apr 24, ISC(2) Leadership Regional Event Series - San Diego, CA April 24 - May 17,  Independent Oracle Users Group Enterprise Data at Risk Seminar Series Tue, Apr 24 IOUG Enterprise Data at Risk Seminar Series - Toronto Wed, Apr 25 IOUG Enterprise Data at Risk Seminar Series - New York Thu, Apr 26 IOUG Enterprise Data at Risk Seminar Series - Boston Thu, Apr 26 ISC(2) Leadership Regional Event Series - San Jose, CA

    Read the article

  • Special Reminder for Oracle OpenWorld Attendees: Oracle Account Credentials

    - by Bob Rhubart
    A special reminder from the event organizers for those attending Oracle OpenWorld: "Please make sure you have your Oracle.com account log in details with you when you arrive onsite in San Francisco. This is the username and password you used/created for your Oracle OpenWorld San Francisco 2012 registration. These details will be required to check-in and receive your badge as well as to gain access to My Account and Schedule Builder onsite at the event."

    Read the article

  • How to switch from developer to dba? [on hold]

    - by lamwaiman1988
    I am working as a developer for 3 years and I am thinking of switch to dba. I do not own any certificate nor received any training regarding the daily job of dba. My company also do not offer any chance of work/training related to a dba. If I want to be a dba ( because of the salary and a much stable job than developer ), should I go to get some oracle certificates? I've also heard that you can't be a good dba if you cannot get a good understanding about the working OS such as windows/unix ( and to do that you also need to get some certificate on windows administration or unix administration ) but they recommend book of Rich Stevens over certificate. I am confused on what should I do to make this happen.

    Read the article

  • Oracle OpenWorld Preview

    Learn. Develop. Explore. Here’s a sneak peak at Oracle OpenWorld San Francisco, which offers hundreds of learning opportunities, special programs, and networking events. Make plans to be in San Francisco October 11 through 14.

    Read the article

  • Oracle OpenWorld Preview

    Learn. Develop. Explore. Here’s a sneak peak at Oracle OpenWorld San Francisco, which offers hundreds of learning opportunities, special programs, and networking events. Make plans to be in San Francisco October 11 through 14.

    Read the article

  • Oracle OpenWorld Preview

    Learn. Develop. Explore. Here’s a sneak peak at Oracle OpenWorld San Francisco, which offers hundreds of learning opportunities, special programs, and networking events. Make plans to be in San Francisco October 11 through 14.

    Read the article

  • Reminder: JavaOne Call For Papers Closing April 9th, 11:59pm

    - by arungupta
    JavaOne 2012 Call For Papers is closing on April 9th. Make sure to get your submissions in time and make the reviewers job exciting. Submit now! Read tips for paper submission here and an insight into the review process and more tips here. The conference will be held in San Francisco from September 30th to October 4th, 2012. And between now and this JavaOne in San Francisco, the conference is also going to Japan, Russia, and India.

    Read the article

  • What is the best certification for the self-taught ASP.Net programmer? [closed]

    - by Wahid Bitar
    I learned the C#.Net language from books and many other resources then i did some good projects with ASP.Net "Web Forms & MVC". But i wanna a good certificate to get a better work out of my country as i suppose. I've two choices: Apply for a " college / institute " and start study academic courses to be more professional and maybe in two years I'll "hopefully" graduate with this college certificate. Apply for kind of " Certifications by Companies " like MCTS from Microsoft or something like that and study their straightforward courses then maybe with three or four months I'll get this "Not official Certificate". Is the second type of certifications good for learning and work or the best is the hard way ?. Please give me advises with certifications names please. ======================= Update: This is not related to certain country or region. I'm asking about a good certification and courses for an ASP.Net and C# in general programmer.

    Read the article

  • The Windows Store... why did I sign up with this mess again?

    - by FransBouma
    Yesterday, Microsoft revealed that the Windows Store is now open to all developers in a wide range of countries and locations. For the people who think "wtf is the 'Windows Store'?", it's the central place where Windows 8 users will be able to find, download and purchase applications (or as we now have to say to not look like a computer illiterate: <accent style="Kentucky">aaaaappss</accent>) for Windows 8. As this is the store which is integrated into Windows 8, it's an interesting place for ISVs, as potential customers might very well look there first. This of course isn't true for all kinds of software, and developer tools in general aren't the kind of applications most users will download from the Windows store, but a presence there can't hurt. Now, this Windows Store hosts two kinds of applications: 'Metro-style' applications and 'Desktop' applications. The 'Metro-style' applications are applications created for the new 'Metro' UI which is present on Windows 8 desktop and Windows RT (the single color/big font fingerpaint-oriented UI). 'Desktop' applications are the applications we all run and use on Windows today. Our software are desktop applications. The Windows Store hosts all Metro-style applications locally in the store and handles the payment for these applications. This means you upload your application (sorry, 'app') to the store, jump through a lot of hoops, Microsoft verifies that your application is not violating a tremendous long list of rules and after everything is OK, it's published and hopefully you get customers and thus earn money. Money which Microsoft will pay you on a regular basis after customers buy your application. Desktop applications are not following this path however. Desktop applications aren't hosted by the Windows Store. Instead, the Windows Store more or less hosts a page with the application's information and where to get the goods. I.o.w.: it's nothing more than a product's Facebook page. Microsoft will simply redirect a visitor of the Windows Store to your website and the visitor will then use your site's system to purchase and download the application. This last bit of information is very important. So, this morning I started with fresh energy to register our company 'Solutions Design bv' at the Windows Store and our two applications, LLBLGen Pro and ORM Profiler. First I went to the Windows Store dashboard page. If you don't have an account, you have to log in or sign up if you don't have a live account. I signed in with my live account. After that, it greeted me with a page where I had to fill in a code which was mailed to me. My local mail server polls every several minutes for email so I had to kick it to get it immediately. I grabbed the code from the email and I was presented with a multi-step process to register myself as a company or as an individual. In red I was warned that this choice was permanent and not changeable. I chuckled: Microsoft apparently stores its data on paper, not in digital form. I chose 'company' and was presented with a lengthy form to fill out. On the form there were two strange remarks: Per company there can just be 1 (one, uno, not zero, not two or more) registered developer, and only that developer is able to upload stuff to the store. I have no idea how this works with large companies, oh the overhead nightmares... "Sorry, but John, our registered developer with the Windows Store is on holiday for 3 months, backpacking through Australia, no, he's not reachable at this point. M'yeah, sorry bud. Hey, did you fill in those TPS reports yesterday?" A separate Approver has to be specified, which has to be a different person than the registered developer. Apparently to Microsoft a company with just 1 person is not a company. Luckily we're with two people! *pfew*, dodged that one, otherwise I would be stuck forever: the choice I already made was not reversible! After I had filled out the form and it was all well and good and accepted by the Microsoft lackey who had to write it all down in some paper notebook ("Hey, be warned! It's a permanent choice! Written down in ink, can't be changed!"), I was presented with the question how I wanted to pay for all this. "Pay for what?" I wondered. Must be the paper they were scribbling the information on, I concluded. After all, there's a financial crisis going on! How could I forget! Silly me. "Ok fair enough". The price was 75 Euros, not the end of the world. I could only pay by credit card, so it was accepted quickly. Or so I thought. You see, Microsoft has a different idea about CC payments. In the normal world, you type in your CC number, some date, a name and a security code and that's it. But Microsoft wants to verify this even more. They want to make a verification purchase of a very small amount and are doing that with a special code in the description. You then have to type in that code in a special form in the Windows Store dashboard and after that you're verified. Of course they'll refund the small amount they pull from your card. Sounds simple, right? Well... no. The problem starts with the fact that I can't see the CC activity on some website: I have a bank issued CC card. I get the CC activity once a month on a piece of paper sent to me. The bank's online website doesn't show them. So it's possible I have to wait for this code till October 12th. One month. "So what, I'm not going to use it anyway, Desktop applications don't use the payment system", I thought. "Haha, you're so naive, dear developer!" Microsoft won't allow you to publish any applications till this verification is done. So no application publishing for a month. Wouldn't it be nice if things were, you know, digital, so things got done instantly? But of course, that lackey who scribbled everything in the Big Windows Store Registration Book isn't that quick. Can't blame him though. He's just doing his job. Now, after the payment was done, I was presented with a page which tells me Microsoft is going to use a third party company called 'Symantec', which will verify my identity again. The page explains to me that this could be done through email or phone and that they'll contact the Approver to verify my identity. "Phone?", I thought... that's a little drastic for a developer account to publish a single page of information about an external hosted software product, isn't it? On Facebook I just added a page, done. And paying you, Microsoft, took less information: you were happy to take my money before my identity was even 'verified' by this 3rd party's minions! "Double standards!", I roared. No-one cared. But it's the thought of getting it off your chest, you know. Luckily for me, everyone at Symantec was asleep when I was registering so they went for the fallback option in case phone calls were not possible: my Approver received an email. Imagine you have to explain the idiot web of security theater I was caught in to someone else who then has to reply a random person over the internet that I indeed was who I said I was. As she's a true sweetheart, she gave me the benefit of the doubt and assured that for now, I was who I said I was. Remember, this is for a desktop application, which is only a link to a website, some pictures and a piece of text. No file hosting, no payment processing, nothing, just a single page. Yeah, I also thought I was crazy. But we're not at the end of this quest yet. I clicked around in the confusing menus of the Windows Store dashboard and found the 'Desktop' section. I get a helpful screen with a warning in red that it can't find any certified 'apps'. True, I'm just getting started, buddy. I see a link: "Check the Windows apps you submitted for certification". Well, I haven't submitted anything, but let's see where it brings me. Oh the thrill of adventure! I click the link and I end up on this site: the hardware/desktop dashboard account registration. "Erm... but I just registered...", I mumbled to no-one in particular. Apparently for desktop registration / verification I have to register again, it tells me. But not only that, the desktop application has to be signed with a certificate. And not just some random el-cheapo certificate you can get at any mall's discount store. No, this certificate is special. It's precious. This certificate, the 'Microsoft Authenticode' Digital Certificate, is the only certificate that's acceptable, and jolly, it can be purchased from VeriSign for the price of only ... $99.-, but be quick, because this is a limited time offer! After that it's, I kid you not, $499.-. 500 dollars for a certificate to sign an executable. But, I do feel special, I got a special price. Only for me! I'm glowing. Not for long though. Here I started to wonder, what the benefit of it all was. I now again had to pay money for a shiny certificate which will add 'Solutions Design bv' to our installer as the publisher instead of 'unknown', while our customers download the file from our website. Not only that, but this was all about a Desktop application, which wasn't hosted by Microsoft. They only link to it. And make no mistake. These prices aren't single payments. Every year these have to be renewed. Like a membership of an exclusive club: you're special and privileged, but only if you cough up the dough. To give you an example how silly this all is: I added LLBLGen Pro and ORM Profiler to the Visual Studio Gallery some time ago. It's the same thing: it's a central place where one can find software which adds to / extends / works with Visual Studio. I could simply create the pages, add the information and they show up inside Visual Studio. No files are hosted at Microsoft, they're downloaded from our website. Exactly the same system. As I have to wait for the CC transcripts to arrive anyway, I can't proceed with publishing in this new shiny store. After the verification is complete I have to wait for verification of my software by Microsoft. Even Desktop applications need to be verified using a long list of rules which are mainly focused on Metro-style applications. Even while they're not hosted by Microsoft. I wonder what they'll find. "Your application wasn't approved. It violates rule 14 X sub D: it provides more value than our own competing framework". While I was writing this post, I tried to check something in the Windows Store Dashboard, to see whether I remembered it correctly. I was presented again with the question, after logging in with my live account, to enter the code that was just mailed to me. Not the previous code, a brand new one. Again I had to kick my mail server to pull the email to proceed. This was it. This 'experience' is so beyond miserable, I'm afraid I have to say goodbye for now to the 'Windows Store'. It's simply not worth my time. Now, about live accounts. You might know this: live accounts are tied to everything you do with Microsoft. So if you have an MSDN subscription, e.g. the one which costs over $5000.-, it's tied to this same live account. But the fun thing is, you can login with your live account to the MSDN subscriptions with just the account id and password. No additional code is mailed to you. While it gives you access to all Microsoft software available, including your licenses. Why the draconian security theater with this Windows Store, while all I want is to publish some desktop applications while on other Microsoft sites it's OK to simply sign in with your live account: no codes needed, no verification and no certificates? Microsoft, one thing you need with this store and that's: apps. Apps, apps, apps, apps, aaaaaaaaapps. Sorry, my bad, got carried away. I just can't stand the word 'app'. This store's shelves have to be filled to the brim with goods. But instead of being welcomed into the store with open arms, I have to fight an uphill battle with an endless list of rules and bullshit to earn the privilege to publish in this shiny store. As if I have to be thrilled to be one of the exclusive club called 'Windows Store Publishers'. As if Microsoft doesn't want it to succeed. Craig Stuntz sent me a link to an old blog post of his regarding code signing and uploading to Microsoft's old mobile store from back in the WinMo5 days: http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2006/10/11/28357/. Good read and good background info about how little things changed over the years. I hope this helps Microsoft make things more clearer and smoother and also helps ISVs with their decision whether to go with the Windows Store scheme or ignore it. For now, I don't see the advantage of publishing there, especially not with the nonsense rules Microsoft cooked up. Perhaps it changes in the future, who knows.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58  | Next Page >