Search Results

Search found 20799 results on 832 pages for 'software protection'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 52/832 | < Previous Page | 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59  | Next Page >

  • Why I Am Against Software Patents

    <b>Redmonk:</b> "I am against software patents because it is not reasonable to expect that the current patent system, nor even one designed to improve or replace it, will ever be able to accurately determine what might be considered legitimately patentable..."

    Read the article

  • Career Advice: finding challenging work in software and web development

    - by dianovich
    Having left my physics degree early, I started out in the realm of web design / front end web development and was able to get work quite quickly. I moved on to spend a chunk of my time on servers and gained experience with frameworks like Wordpress and Drupal, then the likes of Codeigniter and CakePHP and became comfortable in Debian-based and RHEL/CentOS environments. I ventured in to iOS development and published a couple of native apps to the app store too! I have started to spend a good deal of my time writing Python and have invested a little time in Django. The problem is, I still spend a fair chunk of my time doing more front end web development (writing markup and CSS for site themes, design-lead JavaScript, small applications for which application architecture and software engineering are relatively unimportant or too time consuming to invest in) in my job. What I want to do is really exercise the systematic/logical portion of my brain and tackle challenging problems on a daily basis. I want to have to care about big-oh running times, modularity in software, DRY, performance tuning and development methodologies. I want to work for a firm whose clients say: "Yes, these things are important to us and we'll pay you to get them right." But it is difficult: I have no formal training and am potentially becoming a jack of all trades. Not that being a jack of many trades is necessarily a bad thing, but the scope of work I find myself involved in is far too broad. And, there are only so many hours in a day outside of work! My question is: where do I go from here? I am starting to work on a few open source projects and have started to publish content to my blog. But this isn't likely to make it past the recruitment consultants and HR departments of many-a-firm. And I do not, for example, work in a team that practices agile methodologies, so how do I get work in such a team to gain experience? While I have been responsible for implementing version control and some solid working practices into our current environment, there is only so far I can go in this context. What would convince you that i'm worth taking a risk? What would convince you that i'll have caught up the other guys in your employ in next to no time?

    Read the article

  • Is Error Recovery Control or TLER necessary for software RAID5 using LVM

    - by Vincent Davis
    I ave been told that for RAID configurations you don't what to use standard desktop drives because they when/if they enter a error recovery mode they might time out and get dropped from the raid. Is this true for LVM software RAID or this this a hardware RAID issue primarily?. We are running this server primarily as a backup server and would like to take advantage of the lower price of the desktop drives.

    Read the article

  • Good Software Architecture book or material?

    - by Inder Kumar Rathore
    I am a programmer and there is always a word going around about the architecture of the application/software. I want to gain some knowledge about how to develop good architecture. I know it is something that comes with the experience but I need some start so that I can practice it and get some good experience. So Please refer a good book for architecture. I know "Head first design patterns" is there, should I go for it or is there some good books also. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Encouraging software engineers to track time

    - by M. Dudley
    How can I encourage my coworkers to track the time they spend resolving issues and implementing features? We have software to do this, but they just don't enter the numbers. I want the team to get better at providing project estimates by comparing our past estimates to actual time spent. I suspect that my coworkers don't see the personal benefit, since they're not often involved in project scheduling.

    Read the article

  • Agile and different facet of software development

    - by arjun
    It is said that the Kanban methodology is suited for software maintenance and support areas, whereas Scrum is more suited for new product development. No process or methods are complete. Using the right one will help you succeed, but they will not guarantee success. Which agile approach is best suited for a project which is basically a re-platforming from one technology to another (say from Java to .NET).

    Read the article

  • The Case for Complimentary Software Copies

    - by GGBlogger
    As the Geriatric Geek you can understand that I’ve been writing and studying for over 60 years. That means that I’ve seen insane changes in the computer software industry. I’ve made the joke that I get a new college education every 6 months or so. Of course that’s an exaggeration but it doesn’t make the feeling go away. I have a long standing and strong relationship with Microsoft so I’m armed with virtually every tool they make. It also means that I have access to tons of training material. But here’s the rub… Last year I started a definitive read of Professional Visual Basic 2008. The purpose was to fill in holes in my understanding of various things. I’m currently on page 1119 of some 1400 pages. During this sojourn I’ve decided that the future is web related which is to say that the future of “thick client” applications running as Windows applications is likely to slowly disappear. To that end I’ve taken a side trip or two into the world of ASP (including XML), Silverlight and cloud development. After carefully avoiding (that’s tongue in cheek) XML for years I finally had to bite the bullet, so to speak, and start learning XML in earnest. The most recent result of that was trail downloads of Altova’s MissionKit 2010 for Software Architects and Liquid Technologies Liquid XML Studio Developer Edition. These are both beautiful products and I want to learn them and write about them. Now comes the rub… While 30 day evaluations are generous in allowing casual users to assess these technologies for purchase they are NOT long enough to allow an author to evaluate, learn and ultimately write about them. Even if I devoted the full 30 days to learning, using and writing about say Altova’s suite I wouldn’t have enough time. Liquid XML may be a little easier to learn (one product as opposed to 8).  Add to that the fact that I frequently get sidetracked to add to my kit and it really blows out. It can be extremely frustrating when I’ve devoted hours to a project and suddenly discover that to complete it I will either need to purchase a license or abandon the project. Since my life blood does not depend on the product I end up abandoning the project and moving on. So to the folks from whom I request complimentary copies… I guarantee that if I convert your product to doing paid development work I will purchase a license to do that but as long as I am using your product to study for the purpose of writing samples, teaching use or otherwise promoting your product to other paying customers I will ask that you give me a license so that I can do that without facing the dread expiration of a 30 day trial.

    Read the article

  • Use of c89 in GNU software

    - by Federico Culloca
    In GNU coding standard it is said that free software developer should use C89 because C99 is not widespread yet. 1999 Standard C is not widespread yet, so please do not require its features in programs. Reference here. Are they talking about developers knowledge of C99, or about compilers supporting it? Also, is this statement plausible as of today or is it somewhat "obsolete" or at least obsolescent.

    Read the article

  • "Package dependencies cannot be resolved" error when installing software

    - by Savitha
    Iam getting a problem while install media player packages. Package dependencies cannot be resolved This error could be caused by required additional software packages which are missing or not installable. Furthermore there could be a conflict between software packages which are not allowed to be installed at the same time. Depends: libc6 (>= 2.7) but 2.13-0ubuntu13 is to be installed Depends: libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.24.0) but 2.28.6-0ubuntu1 is to be installed Depends: libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 (>= 0.10.22) but 0.10.32-1ubuntu5 is to be installed Depends: libgstreamer0.10-0 (>= 0.10.26) but 0.10.32-3ubuntu3 is to be installed Depends: liborc-0.4-0 (>= 1:0.4.10) but 1:0.4.11-2 is to be installed Depends: libpostproc-extra-51 (>= 4:0.6-1~) but 4:0.6.4-1ubuntu1+medibuntu1 is to be installed Depends: libswscale-extra-0 (>= 4:0.6-1~) but 4:0.6.4-1ubuntu1+medibuntu1 is to be installed gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad: Depends: libc6 (>= 2.7) but 2.13-0ubuntu13 is to be installed Depends: libcairo2 (>= 1.2.4) but 1.10.2-2ubuntu2 is to be installed Depends: libcdaudio1 (>= 0.99.12p2) but 0.99.12p2-9 is to be installed Depends: libdc1394-22 but it is not going to be installed Depends: libdirectfb-1.2-9 but it is not going to be installed Depends: libflite1 but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1) but 1:4.5.2-8ubuntu4 is to be installed Depends: libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.26.0) but 2.28.6-0ubuntu1 is to be installed Depends: libgsm1 (>= 1.0.13) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 (>= 0.10.32) but 0.10.32-1ubuntu5 is to be installed Depends: libgstreamer0.10-0 (>= 0.10.32) but 0.10.32-3ubuntu3 is to be installed Depends: libjasper1 (>= 1.900.1) but 1.900.1-7ubuntu2 is to be installed Depends: libmodplug1 but it is not going to be installed Depends: libmpcdec6 (>= 1:0.1~r435) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libmusicbrainz4c2a (>= 2.1.5) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libofa0 (>= 0.9.3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: liborc-0.4-0 (>= 1:0.4.10) but 1:0.4.11-2 is to be installed Depends: libpng12-0 (>= 1.2.13-4) but 1.2.44-1ubuntu3 is to be installed Depends: librsvg2-2 (>= 2.26.0) but 2.32.1-0ubuntu3 is to be installed Depends: librtmp0 (>= 2.3) but 2.3-2 is to be installed Depends: libschroedinger-1.0-0 (>= 1.0.9) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libsndfile1 (>= 1.0.20) but 1.0.23-1build1 is to be installed Depends: libstdc++6 (>= 4.1.1) but 4.5.2-8ubuntu4 is to be installed Depends: libvpx0 (>= 0.9.0) but it is not going to be installed gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly: Depends: libc6 (>= 2.7) but 2.13-0ubuntu13 is to be installed Depends: libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1) but 1:4.5.2-8ubuntu4 is to be installed Depends: libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.24.0) but 2.28.6-0ubuntu1 is to be installed Depends: libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 (>= 0.10.26) but 0.10.32-1ubuntu5 is to be installed Depends: libgstreamer0.10-0 (>= 0.10.26) but 0.10.32-3ubuntu3 is to be installed Depends: libid3tag0 (>= 0.15.1b) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libmad0 (>= 0.15.1b-3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: liborc-0.4-0 (>= 1:0.4.10) but 1:0.4.11-2 is to be installed Depends: libstdc++6 (>= 4.1.1) but 4.5.2-8ubuntu4 is to be installed

    Read the article

  • Software monetization that is not evil

    - by t0x1n
    I have a free open-source project with around 800K downloads to date. I've been contacted by some monetization companies from time to time and turned them down, since I didn't want toolbar malware associated with my software. I was wondering however, is there a non-evil way to monetize software ? Here are the options as I know them: Add a donation button. I don't feel comfortable with that as I really don't need "donations" - I'm paid quite well. Donating users may feel entitled to support etc. (see the second to last bullet) Add ads inside your application. In the web that may be acceptable, but in a desktop program it looks incredibly lame. Charge a small amount for each download. This model works well in the mobile world, but I suspect no one will go for it on the desktop. It doesn't mix well with open source, though I suppose I could charge only for the binaries (most users won't go to the hassle of compiling the sources). People may expect support etc. after having explicitly paid (see next bullet). Make money off a service / community / support associated with the program. This is one route I definitely don't want to take, I don't want any sort of hassle beyond coding. I assure you, the program is top notch (albeit simple) and I'm not aware of any bugs as of yet (there are support forums and blog comments where users may report them). It is also very simple, documented, and discoverable so I do think I have a case for supplying it "as is". Add affiliate suggestions to your installer. If you use a monetization company, you lose control over what they propose. Unless you can establish some sort of strong trust with the company to supply quality suggestions (I sincerely doubt it), I can't have that. Choosing your own affiliate (e.g. directly suggesting Google Toolbar) is possibly the only viable solution to my mind. Problem is, where do I find a solid affiliate that could actually give value to the user rather than infect his computer with crapware? I thought maybe Babylon (not the toolbar of course, I hate toolbars)?

    Read the article

  • Open-Source Software: Bad, Evil and Un-American

    OS Roundup: So says the International Intellectual Property Alliance, a group of trade bodies that includes the MPAA and the RIAA. In its eyes, countries that encourage the use of open-source software are in the same league as those with rampant copyright piracy.

    Read the article

  • Open-Source Software: Bad, Evil and Un-American

    OS Roundup: So says the International Intellectual Property Alliance, a group of trade bodies that includes the MPAA and the RIAA. In its eyes, countries that encourage the use of open-source software are in the same league as those with rampant copyright piracy.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59  | Next Page >