Search Results

Search found 26438 results on 1058 pages for 'calendar table'.

Page 520/1058 | < Previous Page | 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527  | Next Page >

  • How to get these values with BeautifulSoup?

    - by Damiano
    Hello everybody, I have this html table: <table> <tr> <td class="datax">a</td> <td class="datax">b</td> <td class="datax">c</td> <td class="datax">d</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="datax">e</td> <td class="datax">f</td> <td class="datax">g</td> <td class="datax">h</td> </tr> </table> How to get the second and the fourth value of each <tr> ? If i do: bs.findAll('td', {'class':'datax'}) I get: <td class="datax">a</td> <td class="datax">b</td> <td class="datax">c</td> <td class="datax">d</td> <td class="datax">e</td> <td class="datax">f</td> <td class="datax">g</td> <td class="datax">h</td> it's correct! but I would like to have this result: <td class="datax">b</td> <td class="datax">d</td> <td class="datax">f</td> <td class="datax">h</td> so, the values I want are - b - d - f - h (the second and the forth <td> of each <tr>) Is it possible with BeautifulSoup module? Thank you very much!

    Read the article

  • Need a Count, but Multiple other fields

    - by user3727752
    I have a table that looks like this: person trip_id date home destination joe 1 3/10 chicago new york joe 2 4/10 chicago l.a. joe 3 5/10 chicago boston luther 4 3/12 new york chicago luther 5 3/18 new york boston I want to get a result like person trips firstDate home joe 3 3/10 chicago luther 2 3/12 new york Currently I've got Select person, count(trip_id) as trips, min(date) as firstDate from [table] group by person order by firstDate I can't figure out how to get home in there as well. Home is always unique to the person. But my DBMS doesn't know that. Is there an easy way around this problem? Appreciate it.

    Read the article

  • MySQL Join issue

    - by mouthpiec
    Hi, I have the following tables: --table sportactivity-- sport_activity_id, home_team_fk, away_team_fk, competition_id_fk, date, time (tuple example) - 1, 33, 41, 5, 2010-04-14, 05:40:00 --table teams-- team_id, team_name (tuple example) - 1, Algeria Now I have the following SQL statment that I use to extract Team A vs Team B SELECT sport_activity_id, T1.team_name AS TeamA, T2.team_name AS TeamB, DATE_FORMAT( DATE, '%d/%m/%Y' ) AS DATE, DATE_FORMAT( TIME, '%H:%i' ) AS TIME FROM sportactivity JOIN teams T1 ON home_team_fk = T1.team_id JOIN teams T2 ON ( away_team_fk = T2.team_id OR away_team_fk = '0' ) WHERE DATE( DATE ) >= CURDATE( ) ORDER BY DATE( DATE ) My problem is that when team B is empty, I am having irrelevant information .... it seems that it is returning all the combinations. I need a query that when team B is equal to 0, (this can occur in my scenario) I get only Team A - Team B (as 0) once.

    Read the article

  • SQLite problem with some parameterized queries

    - by Trevor Balcom
    I am having some trouble using SQLite and parameterized queries with a few tables. I have noticed some queries using the "SELECT * FROM Table WHERE row=?" are returning 1 row when there should be more rows returned. If I change the parameterized query to "SELECT * FROM Table WHERE row='row'" then the correct number of rows is returned. Does anyone know why sqlite3_step would return only 1 row when using a parameterized query vs. using the same query in a traditional non-parameterized way? I am using a very thin C++ wrapper around SQLite3. I suspect there could be a problem with the wrapper, but this problem only exists on a few tables. It makes me wonder if there is something wrong with the way those tables are setup. Any advice is appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Empty dict-like collection problem in SQLAlchemy

    - by maksymko
    I have a mapping in SQLAlchemy that looks like this: t_property_value = sa.Table('property_value', MetaData, autoload = True, autoload_with = engine) orm.mapper(PropertyValue, t_property_value) t_estate = sa.Table('estate', MetaData, autoload = True, autoload_with = engine) orm.mapper(Estate, t_estate, properties = dict( property_hash = orm.relation(PropertyValue, collection_class = column_mapped_collection(t_property_value.c.property_id)) )) Now, everything seems to be fine, when I load the Estate object and it has some relations to PropertyValue objects. However, when it does not, then property_hash attribute is None, instead of being something dict-like, so I can not add new relations like this: estate.property_hash[prop_id] = PropertyValue(...) because I get the "'NoneType' object does not support item assignment" error. So, is there any way to force SQLAlchemy to create proper empty collection?

    Read the article

  • Need help optimizing MYSQL query with join

    - by makeee
    I'm doing a join between the "favorites" table (3 million rows) the "items" table (600k rows). The query is taking anywhere from .3 seconds to 2 seconds, and I'm hoping I can optimize it some. Favorites.faver_profile_id and Items.id are indexed. Instead of using the faver_profile_id index I created a new index on (faver_profile_id,id), which eliminated the filesort needed when sorting by id. Unfortunately this index doesn't help at all and I'll probably remove it (yay, 3 more hours of downtime to drop the index..) Any ideas on how I can optimize this query? In case it helps: Favorite.removed and Item.removed are "0" 98% of the time. Favorite.collection_id is NULL about 80% of the time. SELECT `Item`.`id`, `Item`.`source_image`, `Item`.`cached_image`, `Item`.`source_title`, `Item`.`source_url`, `Item`.`width`, `Item`.`height`, `Item`.`fave_count`, `Item`.`created` FROM `favorites` AS `Favorite` LEFT JOIN `items` AS `Item` ON (`Item`.`removed` = 0 AND `Favorite`.`notice_id` = `Item`.`id`) WHERE ((`faver_profile_id` = 1) AND (`collection_id` IS NULL) AND (`Favorite`.`removed` = 0) AND (`Item`.`removed` = '0')) ORDER BY `Favorite`.`id` desc LIMIT 50;

    Read the article

  • Mysql query: count and distinct

    - by Azevedo
    I have this hypotetical MySQL table: TABLE cars: (year, color, brand) How do I count # of cars grouped by brand and year? I mean, how can I get to know how many colors are there grouped by brand like: brand "GM": total # of colors: 8. brand "GM": total # of years (grouped together): 14 (meaning there are count of 14 different years). brand "TOYOTA": total # of colors: 3. brand "TOYOTA": total # of years (grouped together): 10 (meaning there are count of 14 different years) I tried playing some queries with COUNT, DISTINCT, GROUP BY but I can't get to it. Actually I'm trying to get the 2 queries... +-------+---------------+ | brand | count(colors) | +-------+---------------+ +-------+--------------+ | brand | count(years) | +-------+--------------+ thanks a lot!

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET - Update Dataset directly to DB

    - by karthik
    Hi, Description: I wanted to update dataset to database in Asp.NET. Instead of retrieving the entire table, I am retrieving only one record using the following statement :- select * from Products where ProductID=3 Now I wanted to update dataset directly in to DB by using following statements (DAP 4.1) db.UpdateDataSet(ds, ds.Tables[0].TableName, null, cmdupdate, null, UpdateBehavior.Standard); Questions Can I Retrieve only one row from DB while a lot of other records are there and update back using Adapter update? ( In other words, I am not selecting all records from table) I am using Data Application Block 4.1? It will work there right? If anyone can give example for update will be great ( with Procedures). Thanks Ka

    Read the article

  • Select latest group by in nhibernate

    - by Kendrick
    I have Canine and CanineHandler objects in my application. The CanineHandler object has a PersonID (which references a completely different database), an EffectiveDate (which specifies when a handler started with the canine), and a FK reference to the Canine (CanineID). Given a specific PersonID, I want to find all canines they're currently responsible for. The (simplified) query I'd use in SQL would be: Select Canine.* from Canine inner join CanineHandler on(CanineHandler.CanineID=Canine.CanineID) inner join (select CanineID,Max(EffectiveDate) MaxEffectiveDate from caninehandler group by CanineID) as CurrentHandler on(CurrentHandler.CanineID=CanineHandler.CanineID and CurrentHandler.MaxEffectiveDate=CanineHandler.EffectiveDate) where CanineHandler.HandlerPersonID=@PersonID Edit: Added mapping files below: <class name="CanineHandler" table="CanineHandler" schema="dbo"> <id name="CanineHandlerID" type="Int32"> <generator class="identity" /> </id> <property name="EffectiveDate" type="DateTime" precision="16" not-null="true" /> <property name="HandlerPersonID" type="Int64" precision="19" not-null="true" /> <many-to-one name="Canine" class="Canine" column="CanineID" not-null="true" access="field.camelcase-underscore" /> </class> <class name="Canine" table="Canine"> <id name="CanineID" type="Int32"> <generator class="identity" /> </id> <property name="Name" type="String" length="64" not-null="true" /> ... <set name="CanineHandlers" table="CanineHandler" inverse="true" order-by="EffectiveDate desc" cascade="save-update" access="field.camelcase-underscore"> <key column="CanineID" /> <one-to-many class="CanineHandler" /> </set> <property name="IsDeleted" type="Boolean" not-null="true" /> </class> I haven't tried yet, but I'm guessing I could do this in HQL. I haven't had to write anything in HQL yet, so I'll have to tackle that eventually anyway, but my question is whether/how I can do this sub-query with the criterion/subqueries objects. I got as far as creating the following detached criteria: DetachedCriteria effectiveHandlers = DetachedCriteria.For<Canine>() .SetProjection(Projections.ProjectionList() .Add(Projections.Max("EffectiveDate"),"MaxEffectiveDate") .Add(Projections.GroupProperty("CanineID"),"handledCanineID") ); but I can't figure out how to do the inner join. If I do this: Session.CreateCriteria<Canine>() .CreateCriteria("CanineHandler", "handler", NHibernate.SqlCommand.JoinType.InnerJoin) .List<Canine>(); I get an error "could not resolve property: CanineHandler of: OPS.CanineApp.Model.Canine". Obviously I'm missing something(s) but from the documentation I got the impression that should return a list of Canines that have handlers (possibly with duplicates). Until I can make this work, adding the subquery isn't going to work... I've found similar questions, such as http://stackoverflow.com/questions/747382/only-get-latest-results-using-nhibernate but none of the answers really seem to apply with the kind of direct result I'm looking for. Any help or suggestion is greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • slow record deletion with large ntext values

    - by asking
    I'm having trouble deleting some records via a stored procedure from a table in SQLServer 2008R2 that has ntext columns. The stored proc is timing out and running the query directly takes a very long time. The initial query was a straight "delete from y where x = z" and I've also tried running it in batches of 1000 with transactions but it is still slow and timing out in a stored proc. The majority of the records in the table will not be deleted each time (it's not just a once-off query but will be run other times). The ntext columns are not used in the where clause and I can't change the column types. Any suggestions on the quickest way to delete records with large ntext values? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Search row with highest number of cells in a row with colspan

    - by user593029
    What is the efficient way to search highest number of cells in big table with numerous colspan (merge cells ** colspan should be ignored so in below example highest number of cells is 4 in first row). Is it js/jquery with reg expression or just the loop with bubble sorting. I got one link as below explainig use of regex is it ideal way ... can someone suggest pseudo code for this. High cpu consumption due to a jquery regex patch <table width="156" height="84" border="0" > <tbody> <tr style="height:10px"> <td width="10" style="width:10px; height:10px"/> <td width="10" style="width:10px; height:10px"/> <td width="10" style="width:10px; height:10px"/> <td width="10" style="width:10px; height:10px"/> </tr> <tr style="height:10px"> <td width="10" style="width:10px; height:10px" colspan="2"/> <td width="10" style="width:10px; height:10px"/> <td width="10" style="width:10px; height:10px"/> </tr> <tr style="height:10px"> <td width="10" style="width:10px; height:10px"/> <td width="10" style="width:10px; height:10px"/> <td width="10" style="width:10px; height:10px" colspan="2"/> </tr> <tr style="height:10px"> <td width="10" style="width:10px; height:10px" colspan="2"/> <td width="10" style="width:10px; height:10px"/> <td width="10" style="width:10px; height:10px"/> </tr> </tbody> </table>

    Read the article

  • Why SELECT N + 1 with no foreign keys and LINQ?

    - by Daniel Flöijer
    I have a database that unfortunately have no real foreign keys (I plan to add this later, but prefer not to do it right now to make migration easier). I have manually written domain objects that map to the database to set up relationships (following this tutorial http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/43025/A-LINQ-Tutorial-Mapping-Tables-to-Objects), and I've finally gotten the code to run properly. However, I've noticed I now have the SELECT N + 1 problem. Instead of selecting all Product's they're selected one by one with this SQL: SELECT [t0].[id] AS [ProductID], [t0].[Name], [t0].[info] AS [Description] FROM [products] AS [t0] WHERE [t0].[id] = @p0 -- @p0: Input Int (Size = -1; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [65] Controller: public ViewResult List(string category, int page = 1) { var cat = categoriesRepository.Categories.SelectMany(c => c.LocalizedCategories).Where(lc => lc.CountryID == 1).First(lc => lc.Name == category).Category; var productsToShow = cat.Products; var viewModel = new ProductsListViewModel { Products = productsToShow.Skip((page - 1) * PageSize).Take(PageSize).ToList(), PagingInfo = new PagingInfo { CurrentPage = page, ItemsPerPage = PageSize, TotalItems = productsToShow.Count() }, CurrentCategory = cat }; return View("List", viewModel); } Since I wasn't sure if my LINQ expression was correct I tried to just use this but I still got N+1: var cat = categoriesRepository.Categories.First(); Domain objects: [Table(Name = "products")] public class Product { [Column(Name = "id", IsPrimaryKey = true, IsDbGenerated = true, AutoSync = AutoSync.OnInsert)] public int ProductID { get; set; } [Column] public string Name { get; set; } [Column(Name = "info")] public string Description { get; set; } private EntitySet<ProductCategory> _productCategories = new EntitySet<ProductCategory>(); [System.Data.Linq.Mapping.Association(Storage = "_productCategories", OtherKey = "productId", ThisKey = "ProductID")] private ICollection<ProductCategory> ProductCategories { get { return _productCategories; } set { _productCategories.Assign(value); } } public ICollection<Category> Categories { get { return (from pc in ProductCategories select pc.Category).ToList(); } } } [Table(Name = "products_menu")] class ProductCategory { [Column(IsPrimaryKey = true, Name = "products_id")] private int productId; private EntityRef<Product> _product = new EntityRef<Product>(); [System.Data.Linq.Mapping.Association(Storage = "_product", ThisKey = "productId")] public Product Product { get { return _product.Entity; } set { _product.Entity = value; } } [Column(IsPrimaryKey = true, Name = "products_types_id")] private int categoryId; private EntityRef<Category> _category = new EntityRef<Category>(); [System.Data.Linq.Mapping.Association(Storage = "_category", ThisKey = "categoryId")] public Category Category { get { return _category.Entity; } set { _category.Entity = value; } } } [Table(Name = "products_types")] public class Category { [Column(Name = "id", IsPrimaryKey = true, IsDbGenerated = true, AutoSync = AutoSync.OnInsert)] public int CategoryID { get; set; } private EntitySet<ProductCategory> _productCategories = new EntitySet<ProductCategory>(); [System.Data.Linq.Mapping.Association(Storage = "_productCategories", OtherKey = "categoryId", ThisKey = "CategoryID")] private ICollection<ProductCategory> ProductCategories { get { return _productCategories; } set { _productCategories.Assign(value); } } public ICollection<Product> Products { get { return (from pc in ProductCategories select pc.Product).ToList(); } } private EntitySet<LocalizedCategory> _LocalizedCategories = new EntitySet<LocalizedCategory>(); [System.Data.Linq.Mapping.Association(Storage = "_LocalizedCategories", OtherKey = "CategoryID")] public ICollection<LocalizedCategory> LocalizedCategories { get { return _LocalizedCategories; } set { _LocalizedCategories.Assign(value); } } } [Table(Name = "products_types_localized")] public class LocalizedCategory { [Column(Name = "id", IsPrimaryKey = true, IsDbGenerated = true, AutoSync = AutoSync.OnInsert)] public int LocalizedCategoryID { get; set; } [Column(Name = "products_types_id")] private int CategoryID; private EntityRef<Category> _Category = new EntityRef<Category>(); [System.Data.Linq.Mapping.Association(Storage = "_Category", ThisKey = "CategoryID")] public Category Category { get { return _Category.Entity; } set { _Category.Entity = value; } } [Column(Name = "country_id")] public int CountryID { get; set; } [Column] public string Name { get; set; } } I've tried to comment out everything from my View, so nothing there seems to influence this. The ViewModel is as simple as it looks, so shouldn't be anything there. When reading this ( http://www.hookedonlinq.com/LinqToSQL5MinuteOVerview.ashx) I started suspecting it might be because I have no real foreign keys in the database and that I might need to use manual joins in my code. Is that correct? How would I go about it? Should I remove my mapping code from my domain model or is it something that I need to add/change to it? Note: I've stripped parts of the code out that I don't think is relevant to make it cleaner for this question. Please let me know if something is missing.

    Read the article

  • Problem with altering model attributes in controller

    - by SpawnCxy
    Hi all, Today I've got a problem when I tried using following code to alter the model attribute in the controller function userlist($trigger = 1) { if($trigger == 1) { $this->User->useTable = 'betausers'; //'betausers' is completely the same structure as table 'users' } $users = $this->User->find('all'); debug($users); } And the model file is class User extends AppModel { var $name = "User"; //var $useTable = 'betausers'; function beforeFind() //only for debug { debug($this->useTable); } } The debug message in the model showed the userTable attribute had been changed to betausers.And It was supposed to show all records in table betausers.However,I still got the data in the users,which quite confused me.And I hope someone can show me some directions to solve this problem. Regards

    Read the article

  • alter mysqldump file before import

    - by julio
    Hi-- I have a mysqldump file created from an earlier version of a product that can't be imported into a new version of the product, since the db structure has changed slightly (mainly altering a column that was NOT NULL DEFAULT 0 to UNIQUE KEY DEFAULT NULL). If I just import the old dump file, it will error out since the column that has default values of 0 now breaks the UNIQUE constraint. It would be easy enough to either manually alter the mysqldump file, or import into a temp table and change it, then copy to the new table. However, is there a way to do this programatically, so it will be repeatable and not manual? (this will need to happen for many instances of this product). I'm thinking something like disabling key constraints for the import, then setting all values that = 0 to NULL, then re-enabling the key constraints? Is this possible? Any help appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Does it make sense to use BOTH mongodb and mysql in the same rails application?

    - by Brian Armstrong
    I have a good reason to use mongodb for part of my app. But people generally describe it as not a good fit for "transactional" applications like a bank where transactions have to be exact/consistent, etc. Does it make sense to split the models up in Rails and have some of them use MySql and others mongo? Or will this generally cause more problems than it's worth? I'm not building a banking app or anything, but was thinking it might make sense for my users table or or transactions table (recording revenue) to do that part in MySql.

    Read the article

  • Select Columns Only if String length is greater than 2

    - by Zee-pro
    Similar Question may be asked but I am unable to find anything that fits my needs. How can I select only columns where string length is greater than 2 This is how much has done yet. SELECT * FROM Table1 WHERE (Table1.ID = @ID) Or something like WHERE (Table1.ID = @ID) AND (LEN(*) > 2) Thank for all of your help I have a Table, in which I have 35 columns and a User ID column, now I want to select and display information from only those columns which have 2 string. I Like to Select only columns which have 2 string and the defined ID by User not the Whole Row !! I hope I am making sense. Table Desired Result DI 35 Lesson 4 Maths Lesson 9 ICT Lesson 12 English

    Read the article

  • [JQuery] Highlight a Radio field and then pop up an input text box field

    - by kwokwai
    Hi all, I am trying to make some dynamic effect to a HTML page using JQuery. 1. When the user clicks a Radio feild, the field will be highlighted. 2. When the user clicks the Radio 'Man', a Input text box will be provided immeditely just below it. Here is my simple HTML page, but I don't know how to do with the JQuery part: <Table> <TR> <TD>Gender</TD> <TD> Man: <INPUT type=radio name="gender" value="M"><Br/> Woman: <INPUT type=radio name="gender" value="F"> </TD> </TR> <?Table>

    Read the article

  • Why does this work in Firefox but not IE and how can I fix it?

    - by bstullkid
    I want to show and hide rows of a table based on the value of a select box and this works in Firefox but not IE: <select onChange="javascript: toggle(this.value);"> <option value="cat0">category 0</option> <option value="cat1">category 1</option> </select> <table> <tr name="cat0"> <td>some stuff v</td> <td>some stuff v</td> </tr> <tr name="cat0"> <td>some stuff d</td> <td>some stuff d</td> </tr> <tr name="cat1"> <td>some stuff a</td> <td>some stuff a</td> </tr> <tr name="cat1"> <td>some stuff b</td> <td>some stuff b</td> </tr> </table> <script type="text/javascript"> function toggle(category) { // turn everything off for (var i = 0; i < 2; i++) { var cat = document.getElementsByName('cat' + i); for (var j = 0; j < cat.length; j++) cat[j].style.display = 'none'; } // turn on category chosen var cat = document.getElementsByName(category); for (var i = 0; i < cat.length; i++) cat[i].style.display = ''; } // start by showing cat0 toggle('cat0'); </script>

    Read the article

  • How to perform a join with CodeIgniter's Active Record class on a multicolumn key?

    - by Scott Southworth
    I've been able to make this code work using CodeIgniter's db->query as follows: $sql = 'SELECT mapping_code,zone_name,installation_name FROM installations,appearances,zones WHERE installations.installation_id = zones.installation_fk_id AND appearances.installation_fk_id = installations.installation_id AND appearances.zone_fk_id = zones.zone_id AND appearances.barcode = ? '; return $this->db->query($sql,array($barcode)); The 'appearances' table throws a 'not unique table' error if I try this using the Active Record class. I need to join appearances on both the zone and installations tables. How can I do this?

    Read the article

  • CoreData and many NSArrayController

    - by unixo
    In my CoreData Application, I've an outline view on left of main window, acting as source list (like iTunes); on the right I display a proper view, based on outline selection. Each view has its components, such as table view, connected to array controller, owned by the specific view. Very often different views display same data, for example, a table view of the same entity. From a performance point of view, is better to have a single array controller per entity and share it between all views or does CoreData cache avoid memory waste?

    Read the article

  • Insert new row with data computed from other rows

    - by Tyler McHenry
    Suppose I have a MySQL table called MyTable, that looks like this: +----+------+-------+ | Id | Type | Value | +----+------+-------+ | 0 | A | 1 | | 0 | B | 1 | | 1 | A | 2 | | 1 | B | 3 | | 2 | A | 5 | | 2 | B | 8 | +----+------+-------+ And, for each Id, I want to insert a new row with type C whose Value is the sum of the type A and B values for the rows of the same Id. The primary key on this table is (Id, Type), so there's no question of duplication of Id,Type pairs. I can create the rows I want with this query: SELECT MyTable_A.Id AS Id, 'C' AS Type, (A_Val + B_Val) AS Value FROM (SELECT Id, Value AS A_Val FROM MyTable WHERE Type='A') AS MyTable_A JOIN (SELECT Id, Value AS B_Val FROM MyTable WHERE Type='B') AS MyTable_B ON MyTable_A.Id = MyTable_B.Id Giving: +----+------+-------+ | Id | Type | Value | +----+------+-------+ | 0 | C | 2 | | 1 | C | 5 | | 2 | C | 13 | +----+------+-------+ But the question is: How do I use this result to insert the generated type-C rows into MyTable? Is there a relatively simple way to do this with a query, or do I need to write a stored procedure? And if the latter, guidance would be helpful, as I'm not too well versed in them.

    Read the article

  • mySQL & Relational databases: How to handle sharding/splitting on application level?

    - by Industrial
    Hi everybody, I have thought a bit about sharding tables, since partitioning cannot be done with foreign keys in a mySQL table. Maybe there's an option to switch to a different relational database that features both, but I don't see that as an option right now. So, the sharding idea seems like a pretty decent thing. But, what's a good approach to do this on a application level? I am guessing that a take-off point would be to prefix tables with a max value for the primary key in each table. Something like products_4000000 , products_8000000 and products_12000000. Then the application would have to check with a simple if-statement the size of the id (PK) that will be requested is smaller then four, eight or twelve million before doing any actual database calls. So, is this a step in the right direction or are we doing something really stupid?

    Read the article

  • Adding animation to my images with JQuery

    - by slandau
    Here is my home page: <%@ Page Language="C#" MasterPageFile="~/Views/Home/Home.Master" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewPage" %> <asp:Content ID="Content2" ContentPlaceHolderID="IndicationContentPlaceHolder" runat="server"> <table id="home" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right:auto;"> <td id="homeLinks"> <div style="padding-left:35px;" id="homeListing" class="containerMid"> <div id="homeView"> <table style="margin-left: auto; margin-right:auto;"> <tr> <tr> <td id="btnIcOld" style="text-align:center;cursor:pointer;"> <img src="<%= VirtualPathUtility.ToAbsolute("~/img/chic/Load.png")%>" /> </td> <td id="btnIc" style="text-align:center;cursor:pointer;"> <img src="<%= VirtualPathUtility.ToAbsolute("~/img/chic/Bar_Chart.png")%>" /> </td> <td id="btnPricing" style="text-align:center;cursor:pointer;"> <img src="<%= VirtualPathUtility.ToAbsolute("~/img/chic/Pie_Chart_disabled.png")%>" /> </td> <td id="btnSheets" style="text-align:center;cursor:pointer;"> <img src="<%= VirtualPathUtility.ToAbsolute("~/img/chic/Line_Chart_disabled.png")%>" /> </td> <td id="btnPort" style="text-align:center;cursor:pointer;"> <img src="<%= VirtualPathUtility.ToAbsolute("~/img/chic/Modify_disabled.png")%>" /> </td> <td id="btnAdmin" style="text-align:center;cursor:pointer;"> <img src="<%= VirtualPathUtility.ToAbsolute("~/img/chic/Profile_disabled.png")%>" /> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="Td1"> <b>Indications Calculator | </b> </td> <td id="lblIc"> <b>Indications Calculator - Beta | </b> </td> <td id="lblPricing"> <b>Managing Pricing Triggers | </b> </td> <td id="lblSheets"> <b>Creating Pricing Sheets | </b> </td> <td id="lblPort"> <b>Portfolio Analysis | </b> </td> <td id="lblAdmin"> <b>Administration</b> </td> </tr> </tr> </table> </div> </div> </td> </table> <div id="pageMessage"></div> <script> $(document).ready(function () { $('#btnIc').live('click', function () { window.location.href = "<%=Url.Action("Indications") %>"; }); $('#btnIcOld').live('click', function () { window.location.href = 'https://extranetint/swap'; }); $('#btnPricing').live('click', function () { //window.location.href = "<%=Url.Action("Triggers") %>"; }); $('#btnSheets').live('click', function () { //window.location.href = "<%=Url.Action("Sheets") %>"; }); $('#btnPort').live('click', function () { //window.location.href = "<%=Url.Action("Analysis") %>"; }); $('#btnAdmin').live('click', function () { //window.location.href = "<%=Url.Action("Admin") %>"; }); }); </script> </asp:Content> How can I, with JQuery (or really anything), achieve a mouse-over effect on my images where they will grow a little bit as you hover over them? I tried using JQuery animate but for some reason I couldn't get it to work. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • How to remove an element without id

    - by Bryan
    I have the following code: <table> <tr width="100%"> <td width="130" /> <td id="BottomCell" width="100%" /> <tr> </table> <input type="button"/> I want the first td to be removed from tr when the button is clicked. How can I do this? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Pushing View from UITableView Problem

    - by golfromeo
    Basically, what I want is to be able to press a record in a table, and have it push to another view. To do this, I created a nib file and a UIViewController subclass (for the "pushed" view). I set the nib file's "File Owner" to be the controller I created. Then, in the view controller of the table that will push that view, I set the didSelectRowIndexAtPath: method to include the following: SearchTableController *vc = [[SearchTableController alloc] initWithNibName:@"SearchTable" bundle:[NSBundle mainBundle]]; [self.navigationController pushViewController:vc animated:YES]; [vc release]; (where "SearchTableController" is the name of the UIViewController subclass and "SearchTable" is the name of the nib file) However, when I run this code and click on the record, nothing happens- the app doesn't crash, but the view doesn't get pushed. The code is getting run, because it works when I NSLog(), but it doesn't seem to be pushing the view. Thanks for any help in advance.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527  | Next Page >