Search Results

Search found 31328 results on 1254 pages for 'sql join'.

Page 542/1254 | < Previous Page | 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549  | Next Page >

• Mysql query help needed

  - by Me-and-Coding

  Hi, i have two tables category and hotels where category.id should be equal to hotels.catid. Now how do i select 3 rows from each different category from the hotels table. I have this query: select h.* from hotels h inner join category c on h.catid = c.id order by h.catid, h.hid this selects all records, but i want to select three rows per different category so in all it should return 9 rows with 3 rows for each category. If this can not be done in mysql, you could also suggest php code please. Thanks

  Read the article

• How can I improve the below query?

  - by Newbie

  I have the following input. INPUT: TableA ID Sentences --- ---------- 1 I am a student 2 Have a nice time guys! What I need to do is to extract the words from the sentence(s) and insert each individual word in another table OUTPUT: SentenceID WordOccurance Word ---------- ------------ ----- 1 1 I 1 2 am 1 3 a 1 4 student 2 1 Have 2 2 a 2 3 nice 2 4 time 2 5 guys! I was able to get the answer by using the below query ;With numCTE As ( Select rn = 1 Union all Select rn+1 from numCTE where rn<1000) select SentenceID=id, WordOccurance=row_number()over(partition by TableA.ID order by rn), Word = substring(' '+sentences+' ', rn+1, charindex(' ',' '+sentences+' ', rn+1)-rn-1) from TableA join numCTE on rn <= len(' '+sentences+' ') where substring(' '+sentences+' ', rn,1) = ' ' order by id, rn How can I improve this query of mine.? Basically I am looking for a better solution than the one presented Thanks

  Read the article

• Why is Postgres doing a Hash in this query?

  - by Claudiu

  I have two tables: A and P. I want to get information out of all rows in A whose id is in a temporary table I created, tmp_ids. However, there is additional information about A in the P table, foo, and I want to get this info as well. I have the following query: SELECT A.H_id AS hid, A.id AS aid, P.foo, A.pos, A.size FROM tmp_ids, P, A WHERE tmp_ids.id = A.H_id AND P.id = A.P_id I noticed it going slowly, and when I asked Postgres to explain, I noticed that it combines tmp_ids with an index on A I created for H_id with a nested loop. However, it hashes all of P before doing a Hash join with the result of the first merge. P is quite large and I think this is what's taking all the time. Why would it create a hash there? P.id is P's primary key, and A.P_id has an index of its own.

  Read the article

• Property changing null whilst updating a value.

  - by dinesh

  retreiveing the Data object through a class which is partial class in linq to sql. i am using the same object model to update the changes. but proprertychanging is always null for this object. An anonoymoustype has been converted into strong object type. This strong type is updated again. any one can expalin reason for this? Sample Code: var questions = from Question in _db.CheckListInstanceQuestionDataSource join Question in _db.QuestionDataSource on CheckListInstanceQuestion.UI_QuestionID equals Question.UI_QuestionID where CheckListInstanceQuestion.UI_CheckListInstanceID == instanceID && CheckListInstanceForm.UI_TemplateCheckListFormID == selectedFormID orderby CheckListInstanceQuestion.IN_Order, CheckListInstanceQuestion.VC_Code select new { Question .UI_QuestionID, Question.VC_Description, }; ICollection checkListQuestions = new List(); foreach (var question in questions) { checkListQuestions.Add(new CheckListInstanceQuestion { UI_QuestionID = question.UI_QuestionID, VC_Description = question.VC_Description, });

  Read the article

• How can I write this Table Valued Function as a Stored Procedure?

  - by Alex

  I have the following TVF for fulltext search: FUNCTION [dbo].[Fishes_FullTextSearch] (@searchtext nvarchar(4000), @limitcount int) RETURNS TABLE AS RETURN SELECT * FROM Fishes INNER JOIN CONTAINSTABLE(Fishes, *, @searchtext, @limitcount) AS KEY_TBL ON Fishes.Id = KEY_TBL.[KEY] When I'm using this TVF, it doesn't return a collection of objects of type Fish (which I want!) - instead LINQ creates a new result type which includes all "Fish" fields and the fields Key and Rank. In another question, it was suggested that I rewrite this TVF into a stored procedure for it to return Fish objects only. Can someone help me do this please? Also, it needs to be ordered by Rank. Thank you!

  Read the article

• MySQL: Select pages that are not tagged?

  - by lauthiamkok

  Hi, I have a db with two tables like these below, page table pg_id title 1 a 2 b 3 c 4 d tagged table tagged_id pg_id 1 1 2 4 I want to select the pages which are tagged, I tried with this query below but doesn't work, SELECT * FROM root_pages LEFT JOIN root_tagged ON ( root_tagged.pg_id = root_pages.pg_id ) WHERE root_pages.pg_id != root_tagged.pg_id It returns zero - Showing rows 0 - 1 (2 total, Query took 0.0021 sec) But I want it to return pg_id title 2 b 3 c My query must have been wrong?? How can I return the pages which are not tagged correctly? Thanks.

  Read the article

• How Do I Update a Table From Another Table Only If the Result Count is 1?

  - by Russ Bradberry

  I have a table of 2 tables in a one to many relationship. I want to run an update script that will update the table with the FK of the related table only if there is one result (because if there is multiple then we need to decide which one to use, in another method) Here is what I have so far: UPDATE import_hourly_event_reports i SET i.banner_id = b.banner_id FROM banner b JOIN plan p ON b.plan_id = p.id WHERE b.campain_id = i.campaign_id AND b.size_id = i.size_id AND p.site_id = i.site_id HAVING COUNT(b.banner_id) = 1 As you can see, the HAVING clause doesn't quite work as I'd expect it. I only want to update the row in the import table with the id of the banner from the banner table if the count is equal to 1.

  Read the article

• How to get rid of this error in asp.net-mvc?

  - by Pandiya Chendur

  I am using Linq-to-sql as an ORM. I wrote this innerjoin public IQueryable<Material> FindAllMaterials() { var materials=from m in db.Materials join Mt in db.MeasurementTypes on m.MeasurementTypeId equals Mt.Id select new { m.Mat_id, m.Mat_Name, Mt.Name, m.Mat_Type }; return materials; } But when i compile this i got an error Cannot implicitly convert type 'System.Linq.IQueryable<AnonymousType#1>' to 'System.Linq.IQueryable<CrMVC.Models.Material>'. An explicit conversion exists (are you missing a cast?) Am i missing some thing... Any suggestion....

  Read the article

• Complicated Order By Clause?

  - by Todd

  Hi. I need to do what to me is an advanced sort. I have this two tables: Table: Fruit fruitid | received | basketid 1 20100310 2 2 20091205 3 3 20100220 1 4 20091129 2 Table: Basket id | name 1 Big Discounts 2 Premium Fruit 3 Standard Produce I'm not even sure I can plainly state how I want to sort (which is probably a big part of the reason I can't seem to write code to do it, lol). I do a join query and need to sort so everything is organized by basketid. The basketid that has the oldest fruit.received date comes first, then the other rows with the same basketid by date asc, then the basketid with the next earliest fruit.received date followed by the other rows with the same basketid, and so on. So the output would look like this: Fruitid | Received | Basket 4 20091129 Premuim Fruit 1 20100310 Premuim Fruit 2 20091205 Standard Produce 3 20100220 Big Discounts Any ideas how to accomplish this in a single execution?

  Read the article

• Converting delimited string to multiple values in mysql

  - by epo

  I have a mysql legacy table which contains an client identifier and a list of items, the latter as a comma-delimited string. E.g. "xyz001", "foo,bar,baz". This is legacy stuff and the user insists on being able to edit a comma delimited string. They now have a requirement for a report table with the above broken into separate rows, e.g. "xyz001", "foo" "xyz001", "bar" "xyz001", "baz" Breaking the string into substrings is easily doable and I have written a procedure to do this by creating a separate table, but that requires triggers to deal with deletes, updates and inserts. This query is required rarely (say once a month) but has to be absolutely up to date when it is run, so e.g. the overhead of triggers is not warranted and scheduled tasks to create the table might not be timely enough. Is there any way to write a function to return a table or a set so that I can join the identifier with the individual items on demand?

  Read the article

• ora-30926 error

  - by user1331181

  I am trying to execute the following merge statement but is is showing me ora-30926 error merge into test_output target_table USING (SELECT c.test_code, c.v_report_id, upper_score, CASE WHEN c.test_code = 1 THEN b.mean_diff WHEN c.test_code = 2 THEN b.norm_dist WHEN c.test_code = 3 THEN b.ks_stats WHEN c.test_code = 4 THEN b.ginni WHEN c.test_code = 5 THEN b.auroc WHEN c.test_code = 6 THEN b.info_stats WHEN c.test_code = 7 THEN b.kl_stats END val1 FROM combined_approach b inner join test_output c on b.v_report_id = c.v_report_id and c.upper_score = b.band_code WHERE c.v_report_id = lv_report_id ORDER BY c.test_code) source_table on(target_table.v_report_id = source_table.v_report_id and target_table.v_report_id = lv_report_id) when matched then update SET target_table.upper_value = source_table.val1;

  Read the article

• Fulltext search not returning expected results

  - by Puneet

  I am experimenting with SQL Server full text search. I have a simple Categories table with Id as the primary key: CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Category]( [Id] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, [CategoryName] [varchar](100) NOT NULL, ) My Query is: SELECT * FROM FREETEXTTABLE (Category, CategoryName, 'music') AS F INNER JOIN Category C ON F.[Key] = C.Id ORDER BY F.Rank DESC This returns me several records with the word music in them, but it does NOT return any record with word ‘musical’. Although, it can be said that the string being searched is not very big and using the LIKE operator will resolve it. I would like to use fulltext search because this simple example is going to be extended to include other tables and fileds.

  Read the article

• Linq query with Array in where clause?

  - by Matt Dell

  I have searched for this, but still can't seem to get this to work for me. I have an array of Id's associated with a user (their Organization Id). These are placed in an int[] as follows: int[] OrgIds = (from oh in this.Database.OrganizationsHierarchies join o in this.Database.Organizations on oh.OrganizationsId equals o.Id where (oh.Hierarchy.Contains(@OrgId)) || (oh.OrganizationsId == Id) select o.Id).ToArray(); The code there isn't very important, but it shows that I am getting an integer array from a Linq query. From this, though, I want to run another Linq query that gets a list of Personnel, that code is as follows: List<Personnel> query = (from p in this.Database.Personnels where (search the array) select p).ToList(); I want to add in the where clause a way to select only the users with the OrganizationId's in the array. So, in SQL where I would do something like "where OrganizationId = '12' or OrganizationId = '13' or OrganizatonId = '17'." Can I do this fairly easily in Linq / .NET?

  Read the article

• How can I use an array within a SQL query

  - by ThinkingInBits

  So I'm trying to take a search string (could be any number of words) and turn each value into a list to use in the following IN statement) in addition, I need a count of all these values to use with my having count filter $search_array = explode(" ",$this->search_string); $tag_count = count($search_array); $db = Connect::connect(); $query = "select p.id from photographs p left join photograph_tags c on p.id = c.photograph_id and c.value IN ($search_array) group by p.id having count(c.value) >= $tag_count"; This currently returns no results, any ideas?

  Read the article

• How to save to two tables using one SQLAlchemy model

  - by Oatman

  I have an SQLAlchemy ORM class, linked to MySQL, which works great at saving the data I need down to the underlying table. However, I would like to also save the identical data to a second archive table. Here's some psudocode to try and explain what I mean my_data = Data() #An ORM Class my_data.name = "foo" #This saves just to the 'data' table session.add(my_data) #This will save it to the identical 'backup_data' table my_data_archive = my_data my_data_archive.__tablename__ = 'backup_data' session.add(my_data_archive) #And commits them both session.commit() Just a heads up, I am not interested in mapping a class to a JOIN, as in: http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/05/mappers.html#mapping-a-class-against-multiple-tables

  Read the article

• filter queryset based on list, including None

  - by jujule

  Hi all I dont know if its a django bug or a feature but i have a strange ORM behaviour with MySQL. class Status(models.Model): name = models.CharField(max_length = 50) class Article(models.Model) status = models.ForeignKey(status, blank = True, null=True) filters = Q(status__in =[0, 1,2] ) | Q(status=None) items = Article.objects.filter(filters) this returns Article items but some have other status than requested [0,1,2,None] looking at the sql query : SELECT [..] FROM `app_article` LEFT OUTER JOIN `app_status` ON (`app_article`.`status_id` = `app_status`.`id`) WHERE (`app_article`.`status_id` IN (1, 2) OR `app_status`.`id` IS NULL) ORDER BY [...] the OR app_status.id IS NULL part seems to be the cause. if i change it to OR app_article.status_id IS NULL it works correctly. How to deal with this ? Thanx.

  Read the article

• Select rows where column LIKE dictionary word

  - by Gerve

  I have 2 tables: Dictionary - Contains roughly 36,000 words CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `dictionary` ( `word` varchar(255) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`word`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1; Datas - Contains roughly 100,000 rows CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `datas` ( `ID` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, `hash` varchar(32) NOT NULL, `data` varchar(255) NOT NULL, `length` int(11) NOT NULL, `time` int(11) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`ID`), UNIQUE KEY `hash` (`hash`), KEY `data` (`data`), KEY `length` (`length`), KEY `time` (`time`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 AUTO_INCREMENT=105316 ; I would like to somehow select all the rows from datas where the column data contains 1 or more words. I understand this is a big ask, it would need to match all of these rows together in every combination possible, so it needs the best optimization. I have tried the below query, but it just hangs for ages: SELECT `datas`.*, `dictionary`.`word` FROM `datas`, `dictionary` WHERE `datas`.`data` LIKE CONCAT('%', `dictionary`.`word`, '%') AND LENGTH(`dictionary`.`word`) > 3 ORDER BY `length` ASC LIMIT 15 I have also tried something similar to the above with a left join, and on clause that specified the like statement.

  Read the article

• LinqToSql Sub Entiity Multiple And Operators

  - by halit

  Hi I have an Array of Featureset Id , My Vehicles table has got sub table as FeatureSets I wrote Sql Query Like SELECT [t0].[ID] FROM [dbo].[SearchResultView] AS [t0] Join [dbo].[VehicleFeatureSet] AS [t1] on t0.ID = t1.VehicleID where t1.FeatureSetID = 1 and t1.FeatureSetID= 2 and t1.FeatureSetID= 3 I tried. But I Couldn't var features = Request.QueryString["FeatureSets"].Split(',').ToList().ConvertAll(new Converter<string, int>(StrinToint)); IQueryable<SearchResultView> result = db.SearchResultViews.Where(m => m.Active == true); foreach (var featuree in features) { result = result.Where(m => m.VehicleFeatureSets.Any(c => c.FeatureSetID == featuree)); } How Can I write this LINQ Query

  Read the article

• How are people using virtualisation with SQL Server? Part 2

  - by GavinPayneUK

  This is part two of an article reviewing the results of a virtualisation with SQL Server survey I performed. Part one can be found here. How do you size a new virtual server? When deploying a new virtual server you want to size it according to its predicted workload knowing that additional resource can be allocated as required. Unlike physical servers giving your virtual server more resource than it actually needs can actually be a bad thing, if nothing else if you’ve got resource you’re not using...(read more)

  Read the article

• Index View Index Creation Failing

  - by aBetterGamer

  I'm trying to create an index on a view and it keeps failing, I'm pretty sure its b/c I'm using an alias for the column. Not sure how or if I can do it this way. Below is a simplified scenario. CREATE VIEW v_contracts WITH SCHEMABINDING AS SELECT t1.contractid as 'Contract.ContractID' t2.name as 'Customer.Name' FROM contract t1 JOIN customer t2 ON t1.contractid = t2.contractid GO CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX v_contracts_idx ON v_contracts(t1.contractid) GO --------------------------- Incorrect syntax near '.'. CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX v_contracts_idx ON v_contracts(contractid) GO --------------------------- Column name 'contractid' does not exist in the target table or view. CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX v_contracts_idx ON v_contracts(Contract.ContractID) GO --------------------------- Incorrect syntax near '.'. Anyone know how to create an indexed view using aliased columns please let me know.

  Read the article

• The member [class] has no supported translation to SQL

  - by Code Sherpa

  Hi, I am getting the following error: Error Message:The member 'Company.ProductCore.Core.Domain.Account.Email' has no supported translation to SQL. My method looks like this: public Account GetAccountByEmail(string email) { Account account; using (WorkbookDataContext dc = _conn.GetContext()) { account = ( from a in dc.Accounts join em in dc.Emails on a.AccountId equals em.AccountId where a.Email.EmailAddress == email select a).FirstOrDefault(); } return account; } My Account class has a getter / setter that exposes Email: public Email Email { get { return _email; } set { _email = value; } } And my Email is a LINQ object. I have a feeling that the problem is that I am using a LINQ object for me Email property? I am new to LINQ and am not really sure why this is happening. Help appreciated, thanks...

  Read the article

• php and SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS

  - by Lizard

  I am trying to add the SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS into a query (Please note this isn't for pagination) please note I am trying to add this to a cakePHP query the code I currently have is below: return $this->find('all', array( 'conditions' => $conditions, 'fields'=>array('SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS','Category.*','COUNT(`Entity`.`id`) as `entity_count`'), 'joins' => array('LEFT JOIN `entities` AS Entity ON `Entity`.`category_id` = `Category`.`id`'), 'group' => '`Category`.`id`', 'order' => $sort, 'limit'=>$params['limit'], 'offset'=>$params['start'], 'contain' => array('Domain' => array('fields' => array('title'))) )); Note the 'fields'=>array('SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS',' this obviously doesn't work as It tries to apply the SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS to the table e.g. SELECTCategory.SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS, Is there anyway of doing this? Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks.

  Read the article

• Stairway to Transaction Log Management in SQL Server, Level 6: Managing the Log in BULK_LOGGED Recovery Model

  A DBA may consider switching a database to the BULK_LOGGED recovery model in the short term during, for example, bulk load operations. When a database is operating in the BULK_LOGGED model these, and a few other operations such as index rebuilds, can be minimally logged and will therefore use much less space in the log NEW! Never waste another weekend deployingDeploy SQL Server changes and ASP .NET applications fast, frequently, and without fuss, using Deployment Manager, the new tool from Red Gate. Try it now.

  Read the article

• Index out of range exception when using this query from C#

  - by jenifa

  I am using a calculation in my SQL query. How can I use that calculated field in C#? When I try, I get an index out of range exception. My query is: Select OwnerCompanyLog.olog_name,inlt_companyid,inlt_childcompid,inlt_effectinterest,inlt_percent,inlt_sharetype,inlt_shares,inlt_childbase,inlt_effdate, (inlt_percent * inlt_effectinterest)/100)eff from InterestLogTable INNER JOIN OwnerCompanyLog ON InterestLogTable.inlt_childcompid = OwnerCompanyLog.olog_companyid where inlt_companyid=5 Order By inlt_childcompid I want to use inlt_percent * inlt_effectinterest)/100 in my C# code: entity.ParentCompany = new List<Company>(); while (parentCompanyReader.Read()) { ParentCompany.Effect = parentCompanyReader["eff"].ToString(); entity.ParentCompany.Add(ParentCompany); } parentCompanyReader.Close(); But I got the error above.

  Read the article

• Problem with Nulls and an UPDATE statement

  - by Dave

  UPDATE TableA SET Value = a.Value * b.AnotherValue FROM TableA AS a INNER JOIN TableB AS b WHERE (Condition is true); Here is the problem. The Value field for TableA does not allow nulls. If the calculation of a.Value * b.AnotherValue yields a null, an error is thrown. Now the question. Is there any way to tell the UPDATE to ignore the SET phase when the result of the calculation is a null and delete the record rather than updating it. This UPDATE is intended to update hundreds of records at a time but will fail if a single null is encountered. Also, please note that using the ISNULL() function and setting the Value to zero is not acceptable. I would like the record to be dropped if a null is encountered. Many thanks in advance for any help rendered.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549  | Next Page >