Search Results

Search found 45316 results on 1813 pages for 'class literals'.

Page 544/1813 | < Previous Page | 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551  | Next Page >

• Jsf validation error (shown by h:message) while updating Model, why?

  - by Ignacio

  List.xhtml: <h:selectOneMenu value="#{produtosController.selected.codigo}"> <f:selectItems value="#{produtosController.itemsAvailableSelectOne}"/> </h:selectOneMenu> <h:commandButton action="#{produtosController.createByCodigos}" value="Buscar" /> Controller Class method: public String createByCodigos(){ items = new ListDataModel(ejbFacade.findByCodigos(current.getCodigo())); updateCurrentItem(); return "List"; } Facade Class method: public List<Produtos> findByCodigos(Integer codigo){ Query q = em.createNamedQuery("Produtos.findByCodigo"); q.setParameter("codigo", codigo); return q.getResultList(); } Bean Class query: @NamedQuery(name = "Produtos.findByCodigo", query = "SELECT p FROM Produtos p WHERE p.codigo = :codigo") @Column(name = "codigo") private Integer codigo;

  Read the article

• problem with update the counter value

  - by Edan

  Hello, I having problem to update the counter (integer value). this is the definitions of the class: public class Item_Actions { private final int MAX_ITEMS = 100; private Item myItem[]; private int counter; public Item_Actions() { myItem = new Item[MAX_ITEMS]; counter++; } //Constructor add item into the menu (Description, type & price of Item) public void addItem(Item itm) { myItem[counter] = itm; counter++; }....... Now everytime I call the addItem constructor from another class, the counter always stays on zero. What causing it and how do I save the data inside? thanks

  Read the article

• What is the use of reflection in Java/C# etc

  - by zengr

  I was just curious, why should we use reflection in the first place? // Without reflection Foo foo = new Foo(); foo.hello(); // With reflection Class cls = Class.forName("Foo"); Object foo = cls.newInstance(); Method method = cls.getMethod("hello", null); method.invoke(foo, null); We can simply create an object and call the class's method, but why do the same using forName, newInstance and getMthod functions? To make everything dynamic?

  Read the article

• Fastest/One-liner way to list attr_accessors in Ruby?

  - by viatropos

  What's the shortest, one-liner way to list all methods defined with attr_accessor? I would like to make it so, if I have a class MyBaseClass, anything that extends that, I can get the attr_accessor's defined in the subclasses. Something like this: class MyBaseClass < Hash def attributes # ?? end end class SubClass < MyBaseClass attr_accessor :id, :title, :body end puts SubClass.new.attributes.inspect #=> [id, title, body] What about to display just the attr_reader and attr_writer definitions?

  Read the article

• How to have NHibernate persist a String.Empty property value as NULL

  - by Todd

  I have a fairly simple class that I want to save to SQL Server via NHibernate (w/ Fluent mappings). The class is made up mostly of optional string fields. My problem is I default the class fields to string.empty to avoid NullRefExceptions and when NHibernate saves the row to the database each column contains an empty string instead of null. Question: Is there a way for me to get NHibernate to automatically save null when the string property is an empty string? Or do I need to litter my code with if (string.empty) checks?

  Read the article

• Generics and reflection in Java

  - by Ragesh

  This is probably a very basic question, but I'm really new to generics in Java and I'm having a hard time altering my thought process from the way things are done in C#, so bear with me. I'm trying to build a generic repository in Java. I've created an IRepository interface that looks like this: public interface IRepository<T extends IEntity> And a Repository class that looks like this: public class Repository<T extends IEntity> implements IRepository<T> Now, from within the constructor of my Repository class, I'd like to be able to "divine" the exact type of T. For example, if I instantiated a repository like this: IRepository<MyClass> repo = new Repository<MyClass>(); I'd like to know that T is actually MyClass. This is trivial in C#, but obviously generics are a totally different beast in Java and I can't seem to find anything that would help me do this.

  Read the article

• Calculate average in each group

  - by Gokul

  I am using the following class class Country { int CountryID {get; set;} List<City> city {get; set;} } class City { int CountryID {get; set; } string city {get; set;} int sqkm {get; set;} } Here's is some sample data for Country and City Country US UK Canada City CityC CityF CityA CityB CityG CityD CityE I am populating using List<Country> countries = new List<Country> { new Country() { CountryID = "US", city = new List<City> { new City() {CountryID = "US", City ="CityF", sqkm = 2803 }, and so on Question 1: I want to use LINQ to find avg sq. km of land per country Eg: Canada - 2459 UK - 3243 US - 3564

  Read the article

• How to persist and load an object which conforms to NSCoding protocol?

  - by mystify

  I have made an class which conforms to the NSCoding protocol and does all the encode and decode stuff. For my app, I simply want to persist an object from that class to the device and the next time when the app launches, I want to load that object back into memory. Basically it's just an class which holds some user input information. For example the user starts writing a text but then quits the app. Next time I want to load that data object. I guess I need NSKeyedArchiver? Is there a good tutorial on this? How do I do that?

  Read the article

• Which Java library lets me initialize an object's properties from a properties file?

  - by Kjetil Ødegaard

  Is there a Java library that lets you "deserialize" a properties file directly into an object instance? Example: say you have a file called init.properties: username=fisk password=frosk and a Java class with some properties: class Connection { private String username; private String password; public void setUsername(String username) { this.username = username; } public void setPassword(String password) { this.password = password; } } I want to do this: Connection c = MagicConfigurator.configure("init.properties", new Connection()) and have MagicConfigurator apply all the values from the properties file to the Connection instance. Is there a library with a class like this?

  Read the article

• jQuery .parent() does not work

  - by Misha Moroshko

  Why the following code fails with: Error: class_a_jquery_objects[0].parent is not a function ? HTML: <div> <div class='a b'></div> <div class='b c'></div> <div class='c a'></div> </div> <div id='log'></div> JS: $(function() { var class_a_jquery_objects = $(".a"); $("#log").append(class_a_jquery_objects.length + "<br />"); $("#log").append(class_a_jquery_objects[0] + "<br />"); $("#log").append(class_a_jquery_objects[0].parent() + "<br />"); });

  Read the article

• C++ template typedef

  - by Notinlist

  I have a class template<size_t N, size_t M> class Matrix { // .... }; I want to make a typedef which creates a Vector (column vector) which is equivalent to a Matrix with sizes N and 1. Something like that: typedef Matrix<N,1> Vector<N>; Which produces compile error. The following creates something similar, but not exactly what I want: template <int N> class Vector: public Matrix<N,1> { }; Is there a solution or a not too expensive workaround / best-practice for it? Thanks in advance!

  Read the article

• Hibernate - why use many-to-one to represent a one-to-one?

  - by aberrant80

  I've seen people use many-to-one mappings to represent one-to-one relationships. I've also read this in a book by Gavin King and on articles. For example, if a customer can have exactly one shipping address, and a shipping address can belong to only one customer, the mapping is given as: <class name="Customer" table="CUSTOMERS"> ... <many-to-one name="shippingAddress" class="Address" column="SHIPPING_ADDRESS_ID" cascade="save-update" unique="true"/> ... </class> The book reasons as (quoting it): "You don't care what's on the target side of the association, so you can treat it like a to-one association without the many part." My question is, why use many-to-one and not one-to-one? What is it about a one-to-one that makes it a less desirable option to many-to-one? Thanks.

  Read the article

• Dynamic binding in C++

  - by chmike

  I'm implementing a CORBA like server. Each class has remotely callable methods and a dispatch method with two possible input, a string identifying the method or an integer which would be the index of the method in a table. A mapping of the string to the corresponding integer would be implemented by a map. The caller would send the string on the first call and get back the integer with the response so that it simply has to send the integer on subsequent calls. It is just a small optimization. The integer may be assigned dynamically on demand by the server object. The server class may be derived from another class with overridden virtual methods. What could be a simple and general way to define the method binding and the dispatch method ?

  Read the article

• Inheritance: possible to change base reference to something else?

  - by fred

  For example I have two classes, Base and Derived as shown below: class Base { public string Name { get; set; } public Base() { } } class Derived : Base { public Derived(Base b) { base = b; // doesn't compile, but is there any way to do something similar? } } So that they behave like this: Base b = new Base(); b.Name = "Bob"; Derived d = new Derived(b); d.Name = "John"; // b.Name is now "John" also Is this possible? I guess one way would be to keep the Base b reference in Derived and override Derived.Name to point to b.Name? Is there an easier way though, for example if I have like 50 properties to override? class Derived : Base { Base b; public override string Name { get { return b.Name; } set { b.Name = value; } } public Derived(Base b) { this.b = b; } }

  Read the article

• Dynamic validation in jquery

  - by mansoor

  $(document).ready(function(){ $('a[rel=addhint]').click(function(){ var html='<div><label>Hint</label>'; html+='<span class="input"><input type="text" size="30" class="text" name="hint"/><a href="#" rel="delhint">delete</a></span><br class="clear" /></div>'; $('div#hintTextContainer').append(html); bindDelHintAll(); return false; }); I want when a new text area include vadition of required field and max length will also apply on it.

  Read the article

• manage date fields when are int in the db

  - by Luca Romagnoli

  Hi in my db there is a field "date_start" type integer. This is the part of form for this field <div class="editor-label"> <%: Html.LabelFor(model => model.date_start) %> </div> <div class="editor-field"> <%: Html.TextBoxFor(model => model.date_start, new { @class = "calendar" })%> <%: Html.ValidationMessageFor(model => model.date_start) %> </div> In the form i want that the field's format is date type. and memorize it in int type after calling a my function for the convertion. How can i manage it? thanks

  Read the article

• .replace method in jquery

  - by amit

  i want to replace class me to old when user clicks on a tag, i want to do that only with .replace function. My purpose to learn how replace method work. But the function which i have made not working. <head> <script type="text/javascript" src="jquery-1.7.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> $(function(){ $('a').click(function(){ $(this).attr('class').replace('me','old') }) }) </script> </head> <body> <a href="#" class="me">click</a> </body>

  Read the article

• Possible for C++ template to check for a function's existence?

  - by andy

  Is it possible to write a C++ template that changes behavior depending on if a certain member function is defined on a class? Here's a simple example of what I would want to write: template<class T> std::string optionalToString(T* obj) { if (FUNCTION_EXISTS(T->toString)) return obj->toString(); else return "toString not defined"; } So if class T has "toString" defined then it uses it, otherwise it doesn't. The magical part that I don't know how to do is the "FUNCTION_EXISTS" part.

  Read the article

• Forbid public Add and Delete for a List<T>

  - by aaginor

  Hi folks, in my C#-project, I have a class which contains a List public class MyClass { public MyClass parent; public List<MyClass> children; ... } I want to prevent the user of the class from Adding (and Deleting) an Element to the children-List, but he shall still be able to parse its elements. I want to handle the Adding and Deleting within MyClass, providing an AddChild(MyClass item) and DeleteChild(MyClass item) to ensure that, when an item is added to the child list, the parent of that item will be set properly. Any idea how to do this besides implementing my own IList? Thanks in advance, Frank

  Read the article

• Push html attribute to array onClick

  - by Hunkeone

  I'm trying to push number attribute of the element to the array onclick with a simple function, but array contains only empty values separated with commas. Here's html code. <button type="button" class="btn btn-success btn-lg" number="12" onclick="basket.push(this.number)">toBakset</button> <button type="button" class="btn btn-success btn-lg" number="15" onclick="basket.push(this.number)">toBakset</button> <button type="button" class="btn btn-success btn-lg" number="18" onclick="basket.push(this.number)">toBakset</button> from the start "basket" array is empty. Seems this question is so dumb but I can't find a solution :(

  Read the article

• How Do I Select a `td` Element in a Row That Has a Checkbox That is Checked?

  - by Russ Bradberry

  I have a table that looks somethings like this: <table> <tr class="row even"> <td><input type="checkbox" /></td> <td class="name">foo</td> <td class="metric">22</td> </tr> ...etc What I want to do is get an array of all td.metric only in rows that have the checkbox checked. This didn't work out as expected: var ticks = $.map($("tr td input:checked td.metric"), function(v,i){ return ... });

  Read the article

• Can I join 2+ styles together into a superstyle?

  - by Kurru

  Hi I was looking to join 2 styles together to make a super style for easy use and customisation of my page. Is it possible to define something like this? (if so how) .bold { font-weight: bold;} .color1 {color: white;} .boldColor {.bold; .color1;} where .boldColor is effectively .boldColor {font-weight:bold; color:white;} I want this so that I can have styles thoughout the page and be able to easily change the colors in many places in 1 place. I'm currently using <p class="bold color"> but some of my class defs are becoming long so I'd like to be able to use <p class="boldColor"> Thanks

  Read the article

• maintain user login status in express.js

  - by chenliang

  when user login the app the username will be display in the header, this is my header.jade div#header_content input(type='text',name='search',id='globle_search') span#user_status if(req.isAuthenticated()) a(class='user_menu_btn',href='home', target='_blank' ) req.user.username a(class='user_menu_btn',href='logout') Logout else a(id='login_btn',href='login',class='user_status_btn') login run the app i get the error says ReferenceError: F:\shopping\views\includes\header.jade:4 req is not defined this is my index route: app.get('/',index.index); exports.index = function(req, res){ res.render('index', { title: 'Express' }); }; how to maintain login ststus in the heaedr? by the way am using passport to login user

  Read the article

• Beginner questions regarding Python classes.

  - by Andy

  Hi. I am new to Python so please don't flame me if I ask something too noobish :) 1. Consider I have a class: class Test: def __init__(self, x, y): self.x = x self.y = y def wow(): print 5 * 5 Now I try to create an object of the class: x = Test(3, 4) This works as expected. However, when I try to call the method wow(), it returns an error, which is fixed by changing wow() to: def wow(self) Why do I need to include self and if I don't, what does the method mean?2. In the definition of __init__: def __init__(self, x, y): self.x = x self.y = y Why do I need to declare x and y, when I can do this: def __init__(self): self.x = x self.y = y I hope I am being clear... Thanks for your time.

  Read the article

• Beginning with Datampper, Association question

  - by Ian

  I'm just diving into Datamapper (and Sinatra) and have a question about associations. Below are some models I have. This is what I want to implemented. I'm having an issue with Workoutitems and Workout. Workout will be managed separately, but Workoutitems has a single workout associated with each row. Workout - just a list of types of workouts (run, lift, situps, etc) Selected workout - this is the name of a set of workouts, along with notes by the user and trainer. It has a collection of N workoutitems Workoutitems - this takes a workout and a number of repetitions to it that go in the workout set. class Workout include DataMapper::Resource property :id, Serial #PK id property :name, String, :length=50,:required=true # workout name property :description, String, :length=255 #workout description end class Selectedworkout include DataMapper::Resource property :id, Serial property :name, String, :length=50, :required=true property :workout_time, String, :length=20 property :user_notes, String, :length=255 property :coach_notes, String, :length=255 has n, :workoutitems end class Workoutitem include DataMapper::Resource property :id, Serial property :reps, String, :length=50, :required=true belongs_to :selectedworkout end

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551  | Next Page >