Search Results

Search found 5243 results on 210 pages for 'mirror drivers'.

Page 56/210 | < Previous Page | 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63  | Next Page >

• How do I fix my installation of ATI Catalyst Video Drivers in 12.04 LTS?

  - by Boris

  My graphic card is a Mobility Radeon HD 4200 Series. I tried these 2 answers from What is the correct way to install ATI Catalyst Video Drivers in 12.04 LTS? But unfortunately, it does not work for me: When running the amd script, I get this error message: $ sudo sh ./amd-driver-installer-12-4-x86.x86_64.run ... DKMS part of installation failed. Please refer to /usr/share/ati/fglrx-install.log for details When checking this log file, I get: Uninstalling any previously installed drivers. Creating symlink /var/lib/dkms/fglrx/8.961/source -> /usr/src/fglrx-8.961 DKMS: add completed. Kernel preparation unnecessary for this kernel. Skipping... Building module: cleaning build area.... cd /var/lib/dkms/fglrx/8.961/build; sh make.sh --nohints --uname_r=3.2.0-24-generic-pae --norootcheck......(bad exit status: 1) [Error] Kernel Module : Failed to build fglrx-8.961 with DKMS [Error] Kernel Module : Removing fglrx-8.961 from DKMS Deleting module version: 8.961 completely from the DKMS tree. Done. [Reboot] Kernel Module : update-initramfs When checking with fglrxinfo, I get: $ fglrxinfo X Error of failed request: BadRequest (invalid request code or no such operation) Major opcode of failed request: 138 (ATIFGLEXTENSION) Minor opcode of failed request: 66 () Serial number of failed request: 13 Current serial number in output stream: 13

  Read the article

• Ubuntu 12.10 and nVidia drivers don't like each other?

  - by mingos

  I decided to upgrade both my computers from Precise to Quantal. What a mistake that was. My laptop has a nVidia GT 330M card, while the desktop has an nVidia 9600 GT. In both cases everything goes great as long as I use the Nouveau driver (ugh!). Can't really play games (Amnesia... and hoping for Steam Beta participation...), even though it's OK for work. Now, ever since 9.04 or so, I just installed nvidia-current and all just worked. Since 12.10, after installing nVidia drivers, Unity won't start at all (hangs with only the wallpaper displayed, no cursor or widgets), Gnome Shell is permanently in fallback mode. Now, I have tried on both computers, with multiple clean installs on Ubuntu (two separate downloads, just in case), one from Ubuntu Gnome Remix. And additionally, Fedora 17, which seems to suffer from the same issue. Tried all nVidia driver suggestions available in Software Sources, and even compiled the drivers myself. I tried several versions of the driver to exclude an issue with the newest one. In my frustration, I have switched to Windows (which, ironically, "just works" with my hardware), but still hold a twin OS configuration on the desktop and would like to use Ubuntu again. So, can anyone point me to where the issue might lie?

  Read the article

• How do I fix the Dash search not being able to find "additional drivers" nor "update"?

  - by Dronz

  I am a fairly new user of Ubuntu, and currently have two 12.04 installations, one of which seems to work ok but I have two problems. The problem I'm asking about in this question, is that the Dash search seems unable to find things, such as "additional drivers" or "update". On my working machine, searching for "additional drivers" there finds an icon for the driver program, but on the problem machine, it gives "Sorry, there is nothing that matches your search." Dash also only shows sections for Recent Files, and Downloads, on that machine. The account I'm running is an admin account. This installation also has a stuck Ubuntu Software Center (it loads and hangs) as in threads like this one. I don't think I've done very much to this computer that could cause a problem. I installed g++ and Wt to do some programming. The biggest change I can remember is uninstalling the newfangled scrollbars with "sudo apt-get remove liboverlay-scrollbar3-0.2-0", but re-installing that module seems to have no effect on these issues. Anyone have any ideas? Both machines have been updated with all recommended updates and say they are up to date.

  Read the article

• How to install RAID drivers on already installed Windows 7?

  - by happysencha

  64-bit Windows 7 Ultimate 6GB RAM Intel i7 920 Intel X25-M SSD 80GB 2,5" Club 3D Radeon HD5750 GA-EX58-UD4P Motherboard I've been running fine with Windows 7 installed on the SSD. I wanted to create an mirrored Raid-1 setup for backups using two hard disks, so I ordered two Samsung HD203WI. This motherboard supports two different RAID controllers, the Intel's ICH10R and Gigabyte's SATA2 SATA controller. There are 6 SATA ports behind the ICH10R and 2 SATA ports for the Gigabyte controller. I googled around and seemed that the ICH10R is a better choice and since then I've been trying to make it work. When I activate the [RAID] mode from BIOS, the Windows 7 gives BSOD exactly as described by this guy: "Windows 7 will start to boot, it gets to the screen where there are 4 colors coming together and it blue screens and restarts no matter what I do." First thing I did: turned off the RAID and booted to Windows and tried to install the SATA RAID drivers from Gigabyte. I launch the driver installation program and it gives "This computer does not meet the minimum requirements for installing the software" error. I then tried Intel's Rapid Storage Technology drivers (which apparently is the same as the one offered at Gigabyte's site), but it resulted in exactly the same error. I then detached the new Samsung hard disks from the SATA ports, but left the [RAID] enabled in BIOS. To my surprise, it still BSOD'd, so at this point I knew it is an OS/driver issue. Also, I tried with the Gigabyte's RAID enabled (while the ICH10R RAID disabled) and it booted just fine. So then I thought, that maybe I can't install the RAID drivers from within the OS. So I caused the BSOD on purpose once again, and then with ICH10R RAID activated and Samsung hard disks attached, I choose the Windows 7 Recovery mode in the boot menu. It sees some problem(s), tries to repair, does not succeed and does not ask for drivers (which I put on a USB stick) to install. I also tried to use the command-line in the recovery: "rundll32 syssetup, SetupInfObjectInstallAction DefaultInstall 128 iaStor.inf" but it gave "Installation failed." So I'm clueless how should I proceed. Do I really need to re-install Windows 7 and load RAID drivers in the Win7 setup? I don't want to install any OS on the RAID, the Windows 7 is and will be on the SSD. I just want to have a RAID-1 backup using those two hard disks. I mean why would I need to re-install operating system to add RAID setup?

  Read the article

• Nautilus can't start due to segmentation fault

  - by Dmitriy Sukharev

  Out of the blue I can't start nautilus today. When I try to open any directory it tries to open it, and sometimes I even can see the content of directory, but finally it's closed, after that there are no icons on desktop. When I tried to launch nautilus from terminal, I got: $ nautilus . Initializing nautilus-dropbox 0.7.1 Initializing nautilus-gdu extension Segmentation fault (core dumped) I've tried to move ~/.local/share/gvfs-metadata folder, I don't have nautilus-open-terminal package and don't have file /usr/local/lib/libgtk-3.so.0 Also I can't update system right now. All the time I'm getting the the same hash-sum error: $ sudo apt-get update [sudo] password for dmitriy: Ign http://mirror.mirohost.net precise InRelease Ign http://mirror.mirohost.net precise-updates InRelease Ign http://mirror.mirohost.net precise-security InRelease Hit http://mirror.mirohost.net precise Release.gpg ... Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en Hit http://mirror.mirohost.net precise-security/restricted Translation-en Hit http://mirror.mirohost.net precise-security/universe Translation-en Fetched 1 B in 1s (0 B/s) W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/mirror.mirohost.net_ubuntu_dists_precise_universe_source_Sources Hash Sum mismatch E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead. Any ideas how to rescue my system? UPD: In syslog I have the following errors: Jul 7 21:35:02 dmitriy-desktop kernel: [ 58.059141] nautilus[1991]: segfault at 7fc09d9bb700 ip 00007fc0abb5feb6 sp 00007fff6caa4cf8 error 4 in libc-2.15.so[7fc0aba24000+1b3000] Jul 7 21:35:39 dmitriy-desktop kernel: [ 94.356490] update-notifier[3358]: segfault at 7f6507611700 ip 00007f64cc221eb6 sp 00007fffbcc0dd88 error 4 in libc-2.15.so[7f64cc0e6000+1b3000] Jul 7 21:37:45 dmitriy-desktop kernel: [ 220.501859] nautilus[3629]: segfault at 7f9b9744c700 ip 00007f9b7c9c6eb6 sp 00007fff72e990f8 error 4 in libc-2.15.so[7f9b7c88b000+1b3000] UPD2: Ubuntu version is 12.04.

  Read the article

• Having extreme issues getting Compiz working on Ubuntu 11.10 (32-bit)

  - by Josh Hornell

  I have been working very hard the past few days to try to get Compiz configured and working correctly but I have been running into a lot of issues. I first installed the CompizConfig Settings Manager and tried different features such as the desktop cube and couldn't get any of them to work. Then I read that I may not have the right graphics card drivers installed (Nvidia GT540m). So I went into the Additional Drivers tool and it shows that 'no proprietary drivers are in use on this system', which struck me as a bit odd as when I very first installed Ubuntu it showed that my Nvidia drivers were installed an active until I downloaded and installed the updates to Ubuntu and since then it's shown empty. I then tried to install my graphics card drivers manually via this article How do I install the latest Nvidia drivers via the Additional Drivers tool?. I rebooted and had no issue although I tried to go back into the CompizConfig Settings Manager and couldn't get anything to work as well as my Additional Drivers tool still showed no drivers installed. I feel like I've tried about everything I can think of and any help would be much appreciated!

  Read the article

• Lubuntu 13.04, kernel still 3.8.0-32-generic

  - by Blue Ice

  My question is very similar to Ubuntu 13.10, kernel still 3.8.0-31-generic. Recently was updating to Saucy and the ethernet cable got unplugged. So I decided to run Software Update again, to reinstall files. It returned that "everything is up to date". But according to these command-line searches, that is incorrect. How can I install Saucy now safely from the command line? sudo apt-get install lubuntu-desktop Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done lubuntu-desktop is already the newest version. The following package was automatically installed and is no longer required: linux-image-extra-3.8.0-19-generic Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove it. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. sudo apt-get dist-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. sudo apt-get update Get:1 http://extras.ubuntu.com raring Release.gpg [72 B] Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com raring Release Get:2 http://az-1.hpcloud.mirror.websitedevops.com raring Release.gpg Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com raring/main Sources Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com raring/main i386 Packages Get:3 http://az-1.hpcloud.mirror.websitedevops.com raring-updates Release.gpg Get:4 http://az-1.hpcloud.mirror.websitedevops.com raring-backports Release.gpg Get:5 http://az-1.hpcloud.mirror.websitedevops.com raring-security Release.gpg Get:6 http://az-1.hpcloud.mirror.websitedevops.com raring Release Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com raring/main Translation-en_US Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com raring/main Translation-en Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net raring Release.gpg Ign http://az-1.hpcloud.mirror.websitedevops.com raring Release E: GPG error: http://az-1.hpcloud.mirror.websitedevops.com raring Release: The following signatures were invalid: NODATA 1 NODATA 2 lsb_release -rd Description: Ubuntu 13.04 Release: 13.04 uname -r 3.8.0-32-generic

  Read the article

• How do I configure nVidia drivers on a Portable Ubuntu setup?

  - by Nicholas Flynt

  I've been pulling my hair out over this one for a couple of days now, google is no help. I've created a wonderful (until this issue) portable copy of Ubuntu linux that will boot on mostly anything by using a USB enclosure for my laptop's 80GB SATA drive. So far so good, it boots and runs on everything, and on non-nVidia card setups was even detecting the drivers, or letting me install the required drivers for hardware acceleration and compiz. Because you know, the wobble windows are the most awesome thing ever. Anyway, my desktop machine had an nVidia card, so I'm thinking, sure, I'll just install the nVidia drivers like before and everything will work happily. Not so-- now the desktop and any other nVidia cards work great, but it seems to have completely disabled any other graphics cards. When the kernel module detects that an nVidia card isn't present, it shoots up this nasty little dialog box giving me the option to boot into "low graphics" mode, which doesn't even allow me to use the correct screen resolution, much less see the installed graphics card and try to configure a driver for it. Is there any way to configure Ubuntu (with the dreaded nVidia kernel module) so that it can use nVidia's drivers when an nVidia card is present, and default to the normal (not low-graphics) setup in other cases, so that it has a fair chance of using what's actually present? I'm not afraid to much with config files, I just don't know the underlying system well enough to feel comfortable diving in without a push in the right direction. Thanks guys!

  Read the article

• How do I set up dual monitors on Kubuntu 10.04 using the latest nVidia drivers with a 9800M video ca

  - by NoCatharsis

  I'm a Linux newb so please try to keep the lingo low-key. I installed the latest nVidia drivers on my laptop using the 9800M card. The laptop is a Gateway P-7805u and I'm connected to the second monitor using VGA. Also, before installing the nVidia drivers (and just using the basic drivers included with Kubuntu 10.04), basic dual monitor support worked, except I could not enable compositing features for some reason. So I thought the proprietary drivers would fix this. Several issues have arisen since installation: 1) I've clicked through all of the display settings to activate the second screen with absolutely no change. 2) When I try to apply settings and Save Configuration as the nVidia help suggests, I am told that I cannot save to the X.conf file. I assume this is due to innate permissions on my user settings, which I have no idea how to properly configure. 3) I have no idea where to go from here, as most of the fixes I found online involve Linux syntax and verbiage, to which I'm totally clueless after spending over half my life with Windows.

  Read the article

• Can't log in to GNOME after upgrade (raring -> saucy)

  - by x-yuri

  I've just upgraded my ubuntu (raring to saucy) and I now can't log in to GNOME. As opposed to virtual consoles (Ctrl-Alt-F1, for example). I set it up to log in automatically. But it asks for password now. I type in the password, press Enter, the screen blinks and here I am again at the login screen. Then I looked into /var/log/Xorg.0.log: [ 33.956] Initializing built-in extension DRI2 [ 33.956] (II) LoadModule: "glx" [ 33.956] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so [ 33.956] (II) Module glx: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 33.956] compiled for 1.14.3, module version = 1.0.0 [ 33.956] ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 7.0 [ 33.956] (==) AIGLX enabled [ 33.956] Loading extension GLX [ 33.956] (==) Matched fglrx as autoconfigured driver 0 [ 33.956] (==) Matched ati as autoconfigured driver 1 [ 33.956] (==) Matched fglrx as autoconfigured driver 2 [ 33.956] (==) Matched ati as autoconfigured driver 3 [ 33.956] (==) Matched vesa as autoconfigured driver 4 [ 33.956] (==) Matched modesetting as autoconfigured driver 5 [ 33.956] (==) Matched fbdev as autoconfigured driver 6 [ 33.956] (==) Assigned the driver to the xf86ConfigLayout [ 33.956] (II) LoadModule: "fglrx" [ 33.957] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module fglrx [ 33.957] (II) UnloadModule: "fglrx" [ 33.957] (II) Unloading fglrx [ 33.957] (EE) Failed to load module "fglrx" (module does not exist, 0) [ 33.957] (II) LoadModule: "ati" [ 33.957] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module ati [ 33.957] (II) UnloadModule: "ati" [ 33.957] (II) Unloading ati [ 33.957] (EE) Failed to load module "ati" (module does not exist, 0) [ 33.957] (II) LoadModule: "vesa" [ 33.957] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.so [ 33.957] (II) Module vesa: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 33.957] compiled for 1.14.1, module version = 2.3.2 [ 33.957] Module class: X.Org Video Driver [ 33.957] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 14.1 [ 33.957] (II) LoadModule: "modesetting" [ 33.957] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/modesetting_drv.so [ 33.957] (II) Module modesetting: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 33.957] compiled for 1.14.1, module version = 0.8.0 [ 33.957] Module class: X.Org Video Driver [ 33.957] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 14.1 [ 33.957] (II) LoadModule: "fbdev" [ 33.957] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.so [ 33.958] (II) Module fbdev: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 33.958] compiled for 1.14.1, module version = 0.4.3 [ 33.958] Module class: X.Org Video Driver [ 33.958] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 14.1 [ 33.958] (==) Matched fglrx as autoconfigured driver 0 [ 33.958] (==) Matched ati as autoconfigured driver 1 [ 33.958] (==) Matched fglrx as autoconfigured driver 2 [ 33.958] (==) Matched ati as autoconfigured driver 3 [ 33.958] (==) Matched vesa as autoconfigured driver 4 [ 33.958] (==) Matched modesetting as autoconfigured driver 5 [ 33.958] (==) Matched fbdev as autoconfigured driver 6 [ 33.958] (==) Assigned the driver to the xf86ConfigLayout [ 33.958] (II) LoadModule: "fglrx" [ 33.958] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module fglrx [ 33.958] (II) UnloadModule: "fglrx" [ 33.958] (II) Unloading fglrx [ 33.958] (EE) Failed to load module "fglrx" (module does not exist, 0) [ 33.958] (II) LoadModule: "ati" [ 33.958] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module ati [ 33.958] (II) UnloadModule: "ati" [ 33.958] (II) Unloading ati [ 33.958] (EE) Failed to load module "ati" (module does not exist, 0) [ 33.958] (II) LoadModule: "vesa" [ 33.958] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.so [ 33.958] (II) Module vesa: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 33.958] compiled for 1.14.1, module version = 2.3.2 [ 33.958] Module class: X.Org Video Driver [ 33.958] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 14.1 [ 33.958] (II) UnloadModule: "vesa" [ 33.958] (II) Unloading vesa [ 33.958] (II) Failed to load module "vesa" (already loaded, 0) [ 33.958] (II) LoadModule: "modesetting" [ 33.959] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/modesetting_drv.so [ 33.959] (II) Module modesetting: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 33.959] compiled for 1.14.1, module version = 0.8.0 [ 33.959] Module class: X.Org Video Driver [ 33.959] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 14.1 [ 33.959] (II) UnloadModule: "modesetting" [ 33.959] (II) Unloading modesetting [ 33.959] (II) Failed to load module "modesetting" (already loaded, 0) [ 33.959] (II) LoadModule: "fbdev" [ 33.959] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.so [ 33.959] (II) Module fbdev: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 33.959] compiled for 1.14.1, module version = 0.4.3 [ 33.959] Module class: X.Org Video Driver [ 33.959] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 14.1 [ 33.959] (II) UnloadModule: "fbdev" [ 33.959] (II) Unloading fbdev [ 33.959] (II) Failed to load module "fbdev" (already loaded, 0) [ 33.959] (II) VESA: driver for VESA chipsets: vesa [ 33.959] (II) modesetting: Driver for Modesetting Kernel Drivers: kms [ 33.959] (II) FBDEV: driver for framebuffer: fbdev [ 33.959] (++) using VT number 7 If I install fglrx, it reads: [ 37.152] Initializing built-in extension DRI2 [ 37.152] (II) LoadModule: "glx" [ 37.152] (II) Loading /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/xorg/extra-modules/modules/extensions/libglx.so [ 37.152] (II) Module glx: vendor="Advanced Micro Devices, Inc." [ 37.152] compiled for 6.9.0, module version = 1.0.0 [ 37.152] Loading extension GLX [ 37.153] (==) Matched fglrx as autoconfigured driver 0 [ 37.153] (==) Matched ati as autoconfigured driver 1 [ 37.153] (==) Matched vesa as autoconfigured driver 2 [ 37.153] (==) Matched modesetting as autoconfigured driver 3 [ 37.153] (==) Matched fbdev as autoconfigured driver 4 [ 37.153] (==) Assigned the driver to the xf86ConfigLayout [ 37.153] (II) LoadModule: "fglrx" [ 37.153] (II) Loading /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/xorg/extra-modules/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so [ 37.168] (II) Module fglrx: vendor="FireGL - AMD Technologies Inc." [ 37.168] compiled for 1.4.99.906, module version = 13.10.10 [ 37.168] Module class: X.Org Video Driver [ 37.168] (II) Loading sub module "fglrxdrm" [ 37.168] (II) LoadModule: "fglrxdrm" [ 37.168] (II) Loading /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/xorg/extra-modules/modules/linux/libfglrxdrm.so [ 37.169] (II) Module fglrxdrm: vendor="FireGL - AMD Technologies Inc." [ 37.169] compiled for 1.4.99.906, module version = 13.10.10 [ 37.169] (II) LoadModule: "ati" [ 37.169] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module ati [ 37.169] (II) UnloadModule: "ati" [ 37.169] (II) Unloading ati [ 37.169] (EE) Failed to load module "ati" (module does not exist, 0) [ 37.169] (II) LoadModule: "vesa" [ 37.169] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.so [ 37.169] (II) Module vesa: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 37.169] compiled for 1.14.1, module version = 2.3.2 [ 37.169] Module class: X.Org Video Driver [ 37.169] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 14.1 [ 37.169] (II) LoadModule: "modesetting" [ 37.170] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/modesetting_drv.so [ 37.170] (II) Module modesetting: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 37.170] compiled for 1.14.1, module version = 0.8.0 [ 37.170] Module class: X.Org Video Driver [ 37.170] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 14.1 [ 37.170] (II) LoadModule: "fbdev" [ 37.170] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.so [ 37.170] (II) Module fbdev: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 37.170] compiled for 1.14.1, module version = 0.4.3 [ 37.170] Module class: X.Org Video Driver [ 37.170] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 14.1 [ 37.170] (==) Matched fglrx as autoconfigured driver 0 [ 37.170] (==) Matched ati as autoconfigured driver 1 [ 37.170] (==) Matched vesa as autoconfigured driver 2 [ 37.170] (==) Matched modesetting as autoconfigured driver 3 [ 37.170] (==) Matched fbdev as autoconfigured driver 4 [ 37.170] (==) Assigned the driver to the xf86ConfigLayout [ 37.170] (II) LoadModule: "fglrx" [ 37.170] (II) Loading /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/xorg/extra-modules/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so [ 37.170] (II) Module fglrx: vendor="FireGL - AMD Technologies Inc." [ 37.170] compiled for 1.4.99.906, module version = 13.10.10 [ 37.170] Module class: X.Org Video Driver [ 37.170] (II) LoadModule: "ati" [ 37.170] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module ati [ 37.170] (II) UnloadModule: "ati" [ 37.171] (II) Unloading ati [ 37.171] (EE) Failed to load module "ati" (module does not exist, 0) [ 37.171] (II) LoadModule: "vesa" [ 37.171] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.so [ 37.171] (II) Module vesa: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 37.171] compiled for 1.14.1, module version = 2.3.2 [ 37.171] Module class: X.Org Video Driver [ 37.171] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 14.1 [ 37.171] (II) UnloadModule: "vesa" [ 37.171] (II) Unloading vesa [ 37.171] (II) Failed to load module "vesa" (already loaded, 0) [ 37.171] (II) LoadModule: "modesetting" [ 37.171] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/modesetting_drv.so [ 37.171] (II) Module modesetting: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 37.171] compiled for 1.14.1, module version = 0.8.0 [ 37.171] Module class: X.Org Video Driver [ 37.171] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 14.1 [ 37.171] (II) UnloadModule: "modesetting" [ 37.171] (II) Unloading modesetting [ 37.171] (II) Failed to load module "modesetting" (already loaded, 0) [ 37.171] (II) LoadModule: "fbdev" [ 37.171] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.so [ 37.171] (II) Module fbdev: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 37.171] compiled for 1.14.1, module version = 0.4.3 [ 37.171] Module class: X.Org Video Driver [ 37.171] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 14.1 [ 37.171] (II) UnloadModule: "fbdev" [ 37.171] (II) Unloading fbdev [ 37.171] (II) Failed to load module "fbdev" (already loaded, 0) [ 37.171] (II) AMD Proprietary Linux Driver Version Identifier:13.10.10 [ 37.171] (II) AMD Proprietary Linux Driver Release Identifier: UNSUPPORTED-13.101 [ 37.171] (II) AMD Proprietary Linux Driver Build Date: May 23 2013 15:49:35 [ 37.171] (II) VESA: driver for VESA chipsets: vesa [ 37.171] (II) modesetting: Driver for Modesetting Kernel Drivers: kms [ 37.171] (II) FBDEV: driver for framebuffer: fbdev [ 37.171] (++) using VT number 7 I did more installing/removing packages than that. There were a moment when it said: (EE) Failed to load /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so: undefined symbol: _glapi_tls_Context Also there is init: not found in ~/.xsession-errors: /usr/sbin/lightdm-session: 5: exec: init: not found Actually, I'm out of ideas. What about you? :)

  Read the article

• How to take backup mirror copies of C: drive?

  - by metal gear solid

  I've installed everything on my C: Drive . Whatever i need Windows 7, updated drivers and utilities and software etc i need. I now i want to take a backup mirror of everything in a DVD or i can keep backup in another USB HDD. so in case if i face any windows or hard-drive failure in future then i can restore everything as it is as all are today. I don't want to reinstall everything again Windows, Drivers all utilities and all needed soft-wares. My C: Drive's total capacity is 108 GB but data on c: drive is only 12 GB. What Should i do ? What is the best solution for me? I need free solution.

  Read the article

• How do install graphics drivers for radeon HD 6380g on a HP pavilion g6?

  - by Ryan

  I installed ubuntu from wubi using a live cd but when i booted i just got a black screen so i followed the instructions from this forum http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=10089820&postcount=8 which successfully completed the ubuntu installation but now when i boot ubuntu i just get a command prompt. when i type in startx it comes up with an error. I am told i need to install graphics drivers, how do i do this? Thanks in advance Ryan

  Read the article

• Wondering How Good The Radeon 9700 Pro Drivers Are? Then Just Read Along

  The Radeon 9700 pro drivers is a high-quality card that is at the zenith of the charts based on 3D ground and is a strong competitor to the NVIDIA card. This is the epitome of all the gaming cards an... [Author: Sunny Makkar - Computers and Internet - March 20, 2010]

  Read the article

• How are video card\graphics drivers written exactly? [closed]

  - by Bigyellow Bastion

  I was thinking, since I want an application layer for my operating system, how or what would be the best way to write, or better understand how to write, my own graphics device drivers or software to enable application layered software to request data through my graphics system (I.e. windows, icons, mouse pointers). I don't need every little detail, I'd just like some possible insight on the procedure one may accomplish this feat in, perhaps the best way to understand the interaction between the graphics GUI rendering software to the hardware interaction directly, and the application software requesting the graphics driver itself.

  Read the article

• How to use Unity 3d and Gnome Shell without any drivers?

  - by user49523

  Currently I don't have any driver available for the laptop that I use , and because of this I only can use Unity 2d and Gnome Panel. I have Ubuntu 11.10 and Ubuntu 12.04 installed and no drivers for both. I would like to use Unity 3d and Gnome Shell..instead of Unity and Gnome Panel or at least have that option even if computer became a little slower. Is there a way of enabling Unity 3d and gnome without any driver had been installed?

  Read the article

• its possible to use unity 3d and gnome3 without any drivers?

  - by user49523

  currently i don't have any driver available for the laptop that i use , and cause of this i only can use unity2d and gnome2. i have ubuntu 11.10 and ubuntu 12.04 installed and no drivers for both. i would like to use unity3d and gnome3..instead of unity and gnome2 or at least have that option even if computer became a lit slower. so there is a way of enabling unity 3d and gnome without any driver had been installed?

  Read the article

• Nvidia GTX250( Ubuntu 12.10 64) after install drivers video change to 1600x1200(without left panel, without borders(file,help,go))

  - by NvidiaTroble

  Nvidia GTX250( Ubuntu 12.10 64) after install drivers - 304.51.really.304.43-0ubuntu1(there was x3 point of 96, 173, current- video change to 1600x1200(without left panel, without borders(file,help,go)). I opened (by right mouse lick) and changed to 1024x768 = lines and nothing else(but ubuntu works! So how repair it back to normal? Thank's for all how will tell me how to! (Sorry about my English).

  Read the article

• How does one extract the Canon ip4600 drivers in inf form?

  - by Trix

  I have a x64 machine which needs "additional drivers" for x86 clients. The problem I have is I cannot get the proper .inf files so I can use them. Canon only provides an .exe file, which when extracted has other .exe files and some dll files. I believe Canon changed their drivers, because I did have them extracted at one point, but sadly did not save them :(. The drivers are available here. Hopefully I am clear in what I am trying to do. Canon provides the .exe file. The .exe file when extracted does not produce any .inf driver files. Thanks!

  Read the article

• Are there HP Infinihost III ex drivers for windows available?

  - by Matt

  I picked up some infiniband cards off ebay for development/testing purposes. I was hoping that there would be some drivers available under windows 7, but it doesn't seem to be recognised by the OFED software which would seem to contain windows drivers. They are however immediately picked up by Ubuntu and drivers are loaded. Are these cards supported under windows 7 at all? mstflint under linux reports: Image type: Failsafe FW Version: 4.8.930 I.S. Version: 1 Device ID: 25208 Chip Revision: A0 Description: Node Port1 Port2 Sys image GUIDs: 001a4bffff0c9374 001a4bffff0c9375 001a4bffff0c9376 001a4bffff0c9377 Board ID: (HP_0060000001) VSD: PSID: HP_0060000001 From what I can tell they are the following: HP IB 4X DDR PCI-e DUAL PORT HCA (HP part number 409376-B21)

  Read the article

• Why does apt-get fail to resolve the mirror?

  - by Jake Kubisiak

  I know this has been covered before, but I can't seem to resolve my issue. Here is my output. jake@KUBIE-SERVER:~$ sudo apt-get update Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise InRelease Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates InRelease Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports InRelease Err http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security InRelease Err http://archive.canonical.com precise InRelease Err http://ppa.launchpad.net precise InRelease Err http://archive.canonical.com precise Release.gpg Temporary failure resolving 'archive.canonical.com' Err http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release.gpg Temporary failure resolving 'ppa.launchpad.net' Err http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security Release.gpg Temporary failure resolving 'security.ubuntu.com' Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise Release.gpg Temporary failure resolving 'us.archive.ubuntu.com' Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates Release.gpg Temporary failure resolving 'us.archive.ubuntu.com' Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports Release.gpg Temporary failure resolving 'us.archive.ubuntu.com' Reading package lists... Done W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/InRelease W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise- updates/InRelease W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise- backports/InRelease W: Failed to fetch http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/InRelease W: Failed to fetch http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/InRelease W: Failed to fetch http://ppa.launchpad.net/webupd8team/java/ubuntu/dists/precise/InRelease W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/Release.gpg Temporary failure resolving 'us.archive.ubuntu.com' W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise- updates/Release.gpg Temporary failure resolving 'us.archive.ubuntu.com' W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise- backports/Release.gpg Temporary failure resolving 'us.archive.ubuntu.com' W: Failed to fetch http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise- security/Release.gpg Temporary failure resolving 'security.ubuntu.com' W: Failed to fetch http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/Release.gpg Temporary failure resolving 'archive.canonical.com' W: Failed to fetch http://ppa.launchpad.net/webupd8team/java/ubuntu/dists/precise/Release.gpg Temporary failure resolving 'ppa.launchpad.net' W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead. Any help is greatly appreciated.

  Read the article

• why i failed to build rtorrent?

  - by hugemeow

  i am not root, so i have to build rtorrent from source and hope to install it in my home directory, but failed, why? [mirror@hugemeow rtorrent]$ ls AUTHORS autogen.sh ChangeLog configure.ac COPYING doc INSTALL Makefile.am NEWS rak README scripts src test [mirror@hugemeow rtorrent]$ ./autogen.sh aclocal... aclocal:configure.ac:7: warning: macro `AM_PATH_CPPUNIT' not found in library autoheader... libtoolize... using libtoolize automake... configure.ac: installing `./install-sh' configure.ac: installing `./missing' src/Makefile.am: installing `./depcomp' autoconf... configure.ac:7: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PATH_CPPUNIT If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. though autoge failed, configure script is created. [mirror@hugemeow rtorrent]$ ls aclocal.m4 autogen.sh ChangeLog config.h.in configure COPYING doc install-sh Makefile.am missing rak scripts test AUTHORS autom4te.cache config.guess config.sub configure.ac depcomp INSTALL ltmain.sh Makefile.in NEWS README src run configure, and fail for syntax error near unexpected token `1.9.6', what's wrong? what i should do in order to build this rtorrent for my centos? [mirror@hugemeow rtorrent]$ ./configure checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes ./configure: line 2016: syntax error near unexpected token `1.9.6' ./configure: line 2016: `AM_PATH_CPPUNIT(1.9.6)' [mirror@hugemeow rtorrent]$ git branch * master [mirror@hugemeow rtorrent]$ git branch -a * master remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master remotes/origin/c++11 remotes/origin/master [mirror@hugemeow rtorrent]$ git tag 0.9.0 0.9.1 [mirror@hugemeow rtorrent]$ git clean -dfx Removing Makefile.in Removing aclocal.m4 Removing autom4te.cache/ Removing config.guess Removing config.h.in Removing config.log Removing config.sub Removing configure Removing depcomp Removing doc/Makefile.in Removing install-sh Removing ltmain.sh Removing missing Removing src/Makefile.in Removing src/core/Makefile.in Removing src/display/Makefile.in Removing src/input/Makefile.in Removing src/rpc/Makefile.in Removing src/ui/Makefile.in Removing src/utils/Makefile.in Removing test/Makefile.in Edit 1: details about libtool and libtools [mirror@hugemeow rtorrent]$ libtoolize --version libtoolize (GNU libtool) 1.5.22 Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. [mirror@hugemeow rtorrent]$ libtool --version ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.22 (1.1220.2.365 2005/12/18 22:14:06) Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

  Read the article

• How to add a mirror-disk to my OpenSolaris?

  - by Sanoj

  I have a machine with two harddrives. I have installed OpenSolaris on one of them and now I want to add the other one as a mirror-drive in my zpool rpool. I guess I have to format the second disk first and then add it to the pool. How can I do this?

  Read the article

• Upgrading 10.04LTS -> 10.10 using custom sources

  - by Boatzart

  I'm trying to upgrade to 10.10 from 10.04 LTS using a custom sources.list file that points to an unofficial mirror*. The mirror does have maverick, but I get the following output when upgrading: boatzart@somecomputer: > sudo do-release-upgrade Checking for a new ubuntu release Done Upgrade tool signature Done Upgrade tool Done downloading extracting 'maverick.tar.gz' authenticate 'maverick.tar.gz' against 'maverick.tar.gz.gpg' tar: Removing leading `/' from member names Reading cache Checking package manager Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Building data structures... Done Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Building data structures... Done Updating repository information WARNING: Failed to read mirror file No valid mirror found While scanning your repository information no mirror entry for the upgrade was found. This can happen if you run a internal mirror or if the mirror information is out of date. Do you want to rewrite your 'sources.list' file anyway? If you choose 'Yes' here it will update all 'lucid' to 'maverick' entries. If you select 'No' the upgrade will cancel. Continue [yN] y WARNING: Failed to read mirror file 96% [Working] Checking package manager Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Building data structures... Done Calculating the changes Calculating the changes Could not calculate the upgrade An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade: The package 'update-manager-kde' is marked for removal but it is in the removal blacklist. This can be caused by: * Upgrading to a pre-release version of Ubuntu * Running the current pre-release version of Ubuntu * Unofficial software packages not provided by Ubuntu If none of this applies, then please report this bug against the 'update-manager' package and include the files in /var/log/dist-upgrade/ in the bug report. Restoring original system state Aborting Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Building data structures... Done Here is the relevant section from /var/log/dist-upgrade/main.log: 2010-11-18 14:05:52,117 DEBUG The package 'update-manager-kde' is marked for removal but it's in the removal blacklist 2010-11-18 14:05:52,136 ERROR Dist-upgrade failed: 'The package 'update-manager-kde' is marked for removal but it is in the removal blacklist.' 2010-11-18 14:05:52,136 DEBUG abort called *I'm located inside of USC, and for some crazy reason any sustained downloads to anywhere outside of the University are throttled down to 5kbps inside of my lab. Because of this I need to use the following sources.list: deb http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/ubuntu/ lucid main restricted universe multiverse deb http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/ubuntu/ lucid-updates main restricted universe multiverse deb http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/ubuntu/ lucid-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/ubuntu/ lucid-security main restricted universe multiverse I've tried adding four more entries to the sources.list with s/lucid/maverick/ but that didn't help. Does anyone know how to fix this? Thanks!

  Read the article

• Clear OS always showing "Operation too slow. Less than 1 bytes/sec"

  - by Blue Gene

  Have been trying to install clear os addon but nothing is working as i am facing this error on every mirror in the .repo file. Yum install squid http://mirror2-dallas.clearsdn.com/clearos/core/6/x86_64/repodata/primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno 12] Timeout on http://mirror2-dallas.clearsdn.com/clearos/core/6/x86_64/repodata/primary.sqlite.bz2: (28, 'Operation too slow. Less than 1 bytes/sec transfered the last 30 seconds') Trying other mirror. mirror2-dc.clearsdn.com/clearos/core/6/x86_64/repodata/primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno 12] Timeout on mirror2-dc.clearsdn.com/clearos/core/6/x86_64/repodata/primary.sqlite.bz2: (28, 'Operation too slow. Less than 1 bytes/sec transfered the last 30 seconds') Trying other mirror. mirror1.timburgess.net/clearos/core/6/x86_64/repodata/primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno 12] Timeout on mirror1.timburgess.net/clearos/core/6/x86_64/repodata/primary.sqlite.bz2: (28, 'Operation too slow. Less than 1 bytes/sec transfered the last 30 seconds') Trying other mirror. mirror2-houston.clearsdn.com/clearos/core/6/x86_64/repodata/primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno 12] Timeout on mirror2-houston.clearsdn.com/clearos/core/6/x86_64/repodata/primary.sqlite.bz2: (28, 'Operation too slow. Less than 1 bytes/sec transfered the last 30 seconds') Trying other mirror. mirror3-toronto.clearsdn.com/clearos/core/6/x86_64/repodata/primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno 12] Timeout on mirror3-toronto.clearsdn.com/clearos/core/6/x86_64/repodata/primary.sqlite.bz2: (28, 'Operation too slow. Less than 1 bytes/sec transfered the last 30 seconds') Trying other mirror. mirror2-dallas.clearsdn.com/clearos/core/6/x86_64/repodata/primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno 12] Timeout on mirror2-dallas.clearsdn.com/clearos/core/6/x86_64/repodata/primary.sqlite.bz2: (28, 'O*peration too slow. Less than 1 bytes/sec transfered the last 30 seconds'*) Trying other mirror. mirror2-dc.clearsdn.com/clearos/core/6/x86_64/repodata/primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno 12] Timeout on mirror2-dc.clearsdn.com/clearos/core/6/x86_64/repodata/primary.sqlite.bz2: (28, 'Operation too slow. Less than 1 bytes/sec transfered the last 30 seconds') Trying other mirror. mirror1.timburgess.net/clearos/core/6/x86_64/repodata/primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno 12] Timeout on mirror1.timburgess.net/clearos/core/6/x86_64/repodata/primary.sqlite.bz2: (28, 'Operation too slow. Less than 1 bytes/sec transfered the last 30 seconds') Trying other mirror. mirror3-toronto.clearsdn.com/clearos/core/6/x86_64/repodata/primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno 12] Timeout on mirror3-toronto.clearsdn.com/clearos/core/6/x86_64/repodata/primary.sqlite.bz2: (28, 'Operation too slow. Less than 1 bytes/sec transfered the last 30 seconds') Trying other mirror. Error: failure: repodata/primary.sqlite.bz2 from clearos-core: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. How can i fix this.i am able to access repo through web,and it seems nothing wrong with the repo.Where can be the problem. Tried yum clean all but it also didnt help. Is there a way to fix it as i am not able to install any package in it.

  Read the article

• How can I clone or mirror a site without SEO penalties for duplicate content?

  - by Amanda

  I am a web developer and I want to create clones of the sites I've developed for clients, so that I have an "original copy" on a subdomain of my own website, so that I can showcase my work to new clients. What is the best way to not get my clients original websites penalised for duplicate content? I am planning to have a robots.txt file that disallows all robots, as well as using <link href="http://www.client-canonical-site.com/" rel="canonical" /> in the <head> of the pages. Is that sufficient? Should I use rel=nofollow on all the links as well?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63  | Next Page >