Search Results

Search found 38807 results on 1553 pages for 'foreach value'.

Page 570/1553 | < Previous Page | 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577  | Next Page >

  • PHP Doctrine: filtering data which is already loaded?

    - by ropstah
    I'm new to Doctrine and ActiveRecord. How should I filter a table after it has been loaded? (i suppose this is preferred over sending multiple queries?) Is this 'good' or 'bad'? class UserTable extends Doctrine_Table { function filterByGroup($group) { $ut = new UserTable(); foreach($this as $u) { if($u->group = $group) $ut->add($u); } return $ut; } }

    Read the article

  • Update Multiple records in SQL Server

    - by Yongwei Xing
    Hi all Here is my situation: I use the SqlCommond to update some records in the SQL Server in a ASP.NET web site. Users can choose which records they want to update. Sometimes they may choose 40 or 60 records to update at a time.Is there any good way to do it? I do not want to do like it foreach(string ID in List) { Update here } Best Regards,

    Read the article

  • Stringbuilder ignores last space

    - by chead23
    I am initialising a StringBuilder as follows: StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder("Symptoms are "); After this I loop through a list and add each string item to the end using foreach(var item in list) { builder.Append(item); } An example item would be something like "headache" but once i've appended it to "Symptoms are " and called builder.ToString() it shows: "Symptoms areHeadache...etc" as opposed to "Symptoms are Headache...etc" Why is it ignoring the space?

    Read the article

  • What is your reporting tool of choice?

    - by jms
    Every project invariably needs some type of reporting functionality. From a foreach loop in your language of choice to a full blow BI platform. To get the job done what tools, widgets, platforms has the group used with success, frustration and failure?

    Read the article

  • ASP.Net MVC - Models and User Controls

    - by cdotlister
    Hi guys, I have a View with a Master Page. The user control makes use of a Model: <%@ Control Language="C#" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewUserControl<BudgieMoneySite.Models.SiteUserLoginModel>" %> This user control is shown on all screens (Part of the Master Page). If the user is logged in, it shows a certain text, and if the user isn't logged in, it offers a login box. That is working OK. Now, I am adding my first functional screen. So I created a new view... and, well, i generated the basic view code for me when I selected the controller method, and said 'Create View'. My Controller has this code: public ActionResult Transactions() { List<AccountTransactionDetails> trans = GetTransactions(); return View(trans); } private List<AccountTransactionDetails> GetTransactions() { List<AccountTransactionDto> trans = Services.TransactionServices.GetTransactions(); List<AccountTransactionDetails> reply = new List<AccountTransactionDetails>(); foreach(var t in trans) { AccountTransactionDetails a = new AccountTransactionDetails(); foreach (var line in a.Transactions) { AccountTransactionLine l = new AccountTransactionLine(); l.Amount = line.Amount; l.SubCategory = line.SubCategory; l.SubCategoryId = line.SubCategoryId; a.Transactions.Add(l); } reply.Add(a); } return reply; } So, my view was generated with this: <%@ Page Language="C#" MasterPageFile="~/Views/Shared/Site.Master" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewPage<System.Collections.Generic.List<BudgieMoneySite.Models.AccountTransactionDetails>>" %> Found <%=Model.Count() % Transactions. All I want to show for now is the number of records I will be displaying. When I run it, I get an error: "The model item passed into the dictionary is of type 'System.Collections.Generic.List`1[BudgieMoneySite.Models.AccountTransactionDetails]', but this dictionary requires a model item of type 'BudgieMoneySite.Models.SiteUserLoginModel'." It looks like the user control is being rendered first, and as the Model from the controller is my List<, it's breaking! What am I doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • Chrome not displaying a div

    - by Kyle Sevenoaks
    Click here to see a simple example of what I want. It's really easy, but for some reason Google won't display the "subTotalCaption2" div. It's part of a foreach loop, if needed I can add other codes. There is nothing else in the rest of the css to mess with this, I have checked about 10 times. See it live at euroworker.no/order (add items to basket) In FF and Chrome. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Is Linq Faster, Slower or the same?

    - by Vaccano
    Is this: Box boxToFind = AllBoxes.Where(box => box.BoxNumber == boxToMatchTo.BagNumber); Faster or slower than this: Box boxToFind ; foreach (Box box in AllBoxes) { if (box.BoxNumber == boxToMatchTo.BoxNumber) { boxToFind = box; } } Both give me the result I am looking for (boxToFind). This is going to run on a mobile device that I need to be performance conscientious of.

    Read the article

  • Method-Object pairs in Java

    - by John Manak
    I'd like to create a list of method-object pairs. Each method is a function returning a boolean. Then: foreach(pair) { if method evaluates to true { do something with the object } } One way of modelling this that I can think of is to have a class Constraint with a method isValid() and for each constraint produce an anonymous class (overriding the isValid() method). I feel like there could be a nicer way. Can you think of any?

    Read the article

  • Dictionary w/ null key?

    - by Ralph
    Firstly, why doesn't Dictionary<TKey, TValue> support a single null key? Secondly, is there an existing dictionary-like collection that does? I want to store an "empty" or "missing" or "default" System.Type, thought null would work well for this. More specifically, I've written this class: class Switch { private Dictionary<Type, Action<object>> _dict; public Switch(params KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>>[] cases) { _dict = new Dictionary<Type, Action<object>>(cases.Length); foreach (var entry in cases) _dict.Add(entry.Key, entry.Value); } public void Execute(object obj) { var type = obj.GetType(); if (_dict.ContainsKey(type)) _dict[type](obj); } public static void Execute(object obj, params KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>>[] cases) { var type = obj.GetType(); foreach (var entry in cases) { if (entry.Key == null || type.IsAssignableFrom(entry.Key)) { entry.Value(obj); break; } } } public static KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>> Case<T>(Action action) { return new KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>>(typeof(T), x => action()); } public static KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>> Case<T>(Action<T> action) { return new KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>>(typeof(T), x => action((T)x)); } public static KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>> Default(Action action) { return new KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>>(null, x => action()); } } For switching on types. There are two ways to use it: Statically. Just call Switch.Execute(yourObject, Switch.Case<YourType>(x => x.Action())) Precompiled. Create a switch, and then use it later with switchInstance.Execute(yourObject) Works great except when you try to add a default case to the "precompiled" version (null argument exception).

    Read the article

  • How to optimize perl code for directory exists or not ?

    - by SCNCN2010
    sub DirectoryExists { my $param = shift; # Remove first element of the array shift @{$param}; # Loop through each directory to see if it exists foreach my $directory (@{$param}) { unless (-e $directory && -d $directory) { return 0; } } # True return 1; } is there any way to optimize this code ? is there any good way to optimize this code

    Read the article

  • Creating Tests at Runtime

    - by James Thigpen
    Are there any .NET testing frameworks which allow dynamic creation of tests without having to deal with a hokey Attribute syntax? Something like: foreach (var t in tests) { TestFx.Run(t.Name, t.TestDelegate); } But with the test reporting as you would expect... I could do something like this with RowTests et al, but that seems hokey.

    Read the article

  • Copy a Doctrine object with all relations

    - by elManolo
    I want to copy a record with all his relations. I'm trying with: $o = Doctrine::getTable('Table')->Find(x); $copy = $object->copy(); $relations = $o->getRelations(); foreach ($relations as $name => $relation) { $copy->$relation = $object->$relation->copy(); } $copy->save(); This code doesn't works, but I think it's on the way.

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET lisbox - Selected first item, always

    - by Lijo
    I have a list box which is populated using a dictioanry. When I iterate throught the selected items using the following code, it always show only the first items as selected - even if the first item is not selected. Have you ever encountered this scenario? Could you please help on this? foreach (ListItem item in lstProcessName.Items) { if (item.Selected == true) { selectedNewSales.Add(item.Text); } }

    Read the article

  • [C#] Startup List

    - by Power-Mosfet
    Hi, How do I gat the the full .exe path ManagementClass mangnmt = new ManagementClass("Win32_StartupCommand"); ManagementObjectCollection mcol = mangnmt.GetInstances(); foreach (ManagementObject strt in mcol) { string[] lv = new String[4]; lv[0] = strt["Caption"].ToString(); lv[1] = strt["Location"].ToString(); lv[2] = strt["Command"].ToString(); lv[3] = strt["Description"].ToString(); listView1.Items.Add(new ListViewItem(lv, 0)); }

    Read the article

  • Convert multiquery to a query using group by and so on

    - by ffffff
    -schema CREATE TABLE `ratings` ( `id` int(11) NOT NULL default '0', `rating` int(11) NOT NULL default '1', `rating_start` datetime NOT NULL default '0000-00-00 00:00:00', PRIMARY KEY (`id`) ) TYPE=MyISAM -myprogram.php foreach($ids as $id){ $sql = "SELECT rating FROM ratings WHERE id = '$id' AND rating_start >= NOW()"; $sql .= "ORDER BY rating_start DESC LIMIT 1;" $ret = $db->execute($id); } Can I teke same date from a Query? by using id IN (".implode(",",$ids).") and GROUP BY id

    Read the article

  • using Hibernate to loading 20K products, modifying the entity and updating to db

    - by Blankman
    I am using hibernate to update 20K products in my database. As of now I am pulling in the 20K products, looping through them and modifying some properties and then updating the database. so: load products foreach products session begintransaction productDao.MakePersistant(p); session commit(); As of now things are pretty slow compared to your standard jdbc, what can I do to speed things up? I am sure I am doing something wrong here.

    Read the article

  • how List<string> become AutoCompleteStringCollection

    - by aeruL
    I have list, i want to convert it to autoCompleteStringCollection.. And I don't want use foreach. _textbox.AutoCompleteMode = AutoCompleteMode.Append; _textbox.AutoCompleteSource = AutoCompleteSource.CustomSource; _textbox.AutoCompleteCustomSource = user.GetNameUsers() as AutoCompleteStringCollection; Note user.GetNameUsers() is list. Code doesn't work, it become null. Thank you

    Read the article

  • Convert Object Hierachey to Object Array

    - by Killercam
    All, I want to create an object array foo[], where the constructor for Foo is public Foo(string name, string discription){} I have a database object which has a structure (not incuding stored procedures, functions or views for simplicity) like public class Database { public string name { get; set; } public string filename { get; set; } public List<Table> tables { get; set; } public Database(string name, string filename) { this.name = name; this.filename = filename; } } protected internal class Table { public string name { get; set; } public List<Column> columns { get; set;} public Table(string name, List<Column> columns) { this.name = name; this.columns = columns; } } protected internal class Column { public string name { get; set; } public string type { get; set; } public Column(string name, string type, int maxLength, bool isNullable) { this.name = name; this.type = type; } } I would like to know the quickest way to add Column and Table information to the Foo[] object array? Clearly I can do List<Foo> fooList = new List<Foo>(); foreach (Table t in database.tables) { fooList.Add(new Foo(t.Name, "Some Description")); foreach (Column c in t.columns) fooList.Add(new Foo(c.Name, "Some Description")); } Foo[] fooArr = fooList.ToArray<Foo>(); But is there a quicker way? Clearly LINQ is likely to be slower for a query that does a simalar operation, but I care allot about speed here so any advice would be appreciated. Perhaps the use of a HashSet would be the way to go as there will not be duplicate entries... Thanks for your time.

    Read the article

  • yield returns within lock statement

    - by DayOne
    Hi eveybody, if i have a yield return in a lock statement does the lock get taken out on each yield (5 times in the example below) or only once for all the items in the list? Thanks private List<string> _data = new List<string>(){"1","2","3","4","5"}; private object _locker =new object(); public IEnumerable<string> GetData() { lock (_locker) { foreach (string s in _data) { yield return s; } } }

    Read the article

  • Inspecting values using the debugger in C#

    - by JC
    How do I inspect the return value of this GetItems() function using the debugger? Do I have to create a local variable for the results to accomplish this? foreach (string item in GetItems()) { // some code } private List<string> GetItems() { // return some list }

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577  | Next Page >