Search Results

Search found 10795 results on 432 pages for 'firefox extensions'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 58/432 | < Previous Page | 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65  | Next Page >

  • Enumerating the Future With Reactive Extensions

    Iterating over a collection of items seems like a pretty straightforward mundane concept. I dont know about you, but I dont spend the typical day thinking about the mechanics of iteration, much like I dont spend a lot of time thinking about how a roll of toilet paper is made. At least I didnt until watching Elmo Potty Time with my son. Now I think about it all the time, but I digress. Historically, Ive always thought of iteration as an action over a static set of items. You have this collection...Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

    Read the article

  • Stop bots from crawling old links with extensions

    - by Jared
    I've recently switched to MVC3 which is extension-less for the URL's, but Google and Bing have a wealth of links that they are crawling which no longer exist. So I'm trying to find out if there is a way to format robots.txt (or by some other method) to tell google/bing that any link that ends in an extension isn't a valid link... Is this possible? On pages that I'm concerned about a User having saved as a fav I'm displaying a 404 page that lists the links to take once they are redirected to the new page (I decided to not just redirect them as I don't want to maintain these forever). For Google/Bing sake I do have the canonical tag in the header. User-agent: * Allow: / Disallow: /*.* EDIT: I just added the 3rd line (in text above) and it APPEARS to do what I'm wanting. Allow a path, but disallow a file. Can anyone confirm this?

    Read the article

  • Firefox pour Android introduit la « navigation en tant qu'invité » et le support de l'API Web Audio

    Firefox pour Android introduit la « navigation en tant qu'invité » et le support de l'API Web AudioA la suite de la sortie de Firefox 25, Mozilla a également publié une mise à jour de son navigateur pour les possesseurs de terminaux sous Android.Firefox pour Android hérite de quelques fonctionnalités de version desktop, notamment la prise en charge de l'API Web Audio, une spécification du W3C pour les effets audio avancés à partir de HTML5. Cette nouvelle API permettra, par exemple, aux ingénieurs...

    Read the article

  • MEF, IServiceProvider and Testing Visual Studio Extensions

    - by Daniel Cazzulino
    In the latest and greatest version of Visual Studio, MEF plays a critical role, one that makes extending VS much more fun than it ever was. So typically, you just [Export] something, and then someone [Import]s it and that's it. MEF in all its glory kicks in and gets all your dependencies satisfied. Cool, you say, so let's now import ITextTemplating and have some T4-based codegen going! Ah, if only it was that easy. Turns out by default, none of the VS built-in services are exposed to MEF, apparently because there wasn't enough time to analyze the lifetime, initialization, dependencies, etc. for each one before launch, which makes perfect sense. You don't want to blindly export everything now just in case. There's also the whole VS package initialization thing which in this version of VS is not so transparently integrated with the MEF publishing side (i.e. a MEF export from a package can get instantiated before its owning package, and in fact, the package can remain unloaded forever and the export will continue to be visible to anyone)....Read full article

    Read the article

  • SQL ADO.NET shortcut extensions (old school!)

    - by Jeff
    As much as I love me some ORM's (I've used LINQ to SQL quite a bit, and for the MSDN/TechNet Profile and Forums we're using NHibernate more and more), there are times when it's appropriate, and in some ways more simple, to just throw up so old school ADO.NET connections, commands, readers and such. It still feels like a pain though to new up all the stuff, make sure it's closed, blah blah blah. It's pretty much the least favorite task of writing data access code. To minimize the pain, I have a set of extension methods that I like to use that drastically reduce the code you have to write. Here they are... public static void Using(this SqlConnection connection, Action<SqlConnection> action) {     connection.Open();     action(connection);     connection.Close(); } public static SqlCommand Command(this SqlConnection connection, string sql){    var command = new SqlCommand(sql, connection);    return command;}public static SqlCommand AddParameter(this SqlCommand command, string parameterName, object value){    command.Parameters.AddWithValue(parameterName, value);    return command;}public static object ExecuteAndReturnIdentity(this SqlCommand command){    if (command.Connection == null)        throw new Exception("SqlCommand has no connection.");    command.ExecuteNonQuery();    command.Parameters.Clear();    command.CommandText = "SELECT @@IDENTITY";    var result = command.ExecuteScalar();    return result;}public static SqlDataReader ReadOne(this SqlDataReader reader, Action<SqlDataReader> action){    if (reader.Read())        action(reader);    reader.Close();    return reader;}public static SqlDataReader ReadAll(this SqlDataReader reader, Action<SqlDataReader> action){    while (reader.Read())        action(reader);    reader.Close();    return reader;} It has been awhile since I've really revisited these, so you will likely find opportunity for further optimization. The bottom line here is that you can chain together a bunch of these methods to make a much more concise database call, in terms of the code on your screen, anyway. Here are some examples: public Dictionary<string, string> Get(){    var dictionary = new Dictionary<string, string>();    _sqlHelper.GetConnection().Using(connection =>        connection.Command("SELECT Setting, [Value] FROM Settings")            .ExecuteReader()            .ReadAll(r => dictionary.Add(r.GetString(0), r.GetString(1))));    return dictionary;} or... public void ChangeName(User user, string newName){    _sqlHelper.GetConnection().Using(connection =>         connection.Command("UPDATE Users SET Name = @Name WHERE UserID = @UserID")            .AddParameter("@Name", newName)            .AddParameter("@UserID", user.UserID)            .ExecuteNonQuery());} The _sqlHelper.GetConnection() is just some other code that gets a connection object for you. You might have an even cleaner way to take that step out entirely. This looks more fluent, and the real magic sauce for me is the reader bits where you can put any kind of arbitrary method in there to iterate over the results.

    Read the article

  • Handy Javascript array Extensions &ndash; distinct()

    - by Liam McLennan
    The following code adds a method to javascript arrays that returns a distinct list of values. Array.prototype.distinct = function() { var derivedArray = []; for (var i = 0; i < this.length; i += 1) { if (!derivedArray.contains(this[i])) { derivedArray.push(this[i]) } } return derivedArray; }; and to demonstrate: alert([1,1,1,2,2,22,3,4,5,6,7,5,4].distinct().join(',')); This produces 1,2,22,3,4,5,6,7

    Read the article

  • Useful Extensions for SecurityToken Handling - Convert a SecurityToken to Claims

    - by Your DisplayName here!
    That’s a very common one: public static IClaimsPrincipal ToClaimsPrincipal( this SecurityToken token, X509Certificate2 signingCertificate) {     var configuration = CreateStandardConfiguration(signingCertificate);     return token.ToClaimsPrincipal(configuration.CreateDefaultHandlerCollection()); }   public static IClaimsPrincipal ToClaimsPrincipal(this SecurityToken token, X509Certificate2 signingCertificate, string audienceUri) {     var configuration = CreateStandardConfiguration(signingCertificate);     configuration.AudienceRestriction.AudienceMode = AudienceUriMode.Always;     configuration.AudienceRestriction.AllowedAudienceUris.Add(new Uri(audienceUri));     return token.ToClaimsPrincipal(configuration.CreateDefaultHandlerCollection()); }   public static IClaimsPrincipal ToClaimsPrincipal( this SecurityToken token, SecurityTokenHandlerCollection handler) {     var ids = handler.ValidateToken(token);     return ClaimsPrincipal.CreateFromIdentities(ids); }   private static SecurityTokenHandlerConfiguration CreateStandardConfiguration( X509Certificate2 signingCertificate) {     var configuration = new SecurityTokenHandlerConfiguration();     configuration.AudienceRestriction.AudienceMode = AudienceUriMode.Never;     configuration.IssuerNameRegistry = signingCertificate.CreateIssuerNameRegistry();     configuration.IssuerTokenResolver = signingCertificate.CreateSecurityTokenResolver();     configuration.SaveBootstrapTokens = true;     return configuration; }  private static IssuerNameRegistry CreateIssuerNameRegistry(this X509Certificate2 certificate) {     var registry = new ConfigurationBasedIssuerNameRegistry();     registry.AddTrustedIssuer(certificate.Thumbprint, certificate.Subject);     return registry; }   private static SecurityTokenResolver CreateSecurityTokenResolver( this X509Certificate2 certificate) {     var tokens = new List<SecurityToken>     {         new X509SecurityToken(certificate)     };     return SecurityTokenResolver.CreateDefaultSecurityTokenResolver(tokens.AsReadOnly(), true); }   private static SecurityTokenHandlerCollection CreateDefaultHandlerCollection( this SecurityTokenHandlerConfiguration configuration) {     return  SecurityTokenHandlerCollection.CreateDefaultSecurityTokenHandlerCollection(configuration); }  

    Read the article

  • Script language native extensions - avoiding name collisions and cluttering others' namespace

    - by H2CO3
    I have developed a small scripting language and I've just started writing the very first native library bindings. This is practically the first time I'm writing a native extension to a script language, so I've run into a conceptual issue. I'd like to write glue code for popular libraries so that they can be used from this language, and because of the design of the engine I've written, this is achieved using an array of C structs describing the function name visible by the virtual machine, along with a function pointer. Thus, a native binding is really just a global array variable, and now I must obviously give it a (preferably good) name. In C, it's idiomatic to put one's own functions in a "namespace" by prepending a custom prefix to function names, as in myscript_parse_source() or myscript_run_bytecode(). The custom name shall ideally describe the name of the library which it is part of. Here arises the confusion. Let's say I'm writing a binding for libcURL. In this case, it seems reasonable to call my extension library curl_myscript_binding, like this: MYSCRIPT_API const MyScriptExtFunc curl_myscript_lib[10]; But now this collides with the curl namespace. (I have even thought about calling it curlmyscript_lib but unfortunately, libcURL does not exclusively use the curl_ prefix -- the public APIs contain macros like CURLCODE_* and CURLOPT_*, so I assume this would clutter the namespace as well.) Another option would be to declare it as myscript_curl_lib, but that's good only as long as I'm the only one who writes bindings (since I know what I am doing with my namespace). As soon as other contributors start to add their own native bindings, they now clutter the myscript namespace. (I've done some research, and it seems that for example the Perl cURL binding follows this pattern. Not sure what I should think about that...) So how do you suggest I name my variables? Are there any general guidelines that should be followed?

    Read the article

  • Why doesn't the Gtalk plugin work in Firefox 3.6 betas? [closed]

    - by etlovett
    I've done a quick Google search, Bugzilla search, and glanced at Google's site for the GTalk plugin, but I can't find an answer, so I thought I'd pose the question here: On OS X, in the Firefox 3.6 betas (I'm now on beta 5, but it's been happening since at least beta 3), the GTalk plugin doesn't work for me. I've been completely unable to use video chat in GChat, which forces me to open Firefox 3.5 whenever I want to use it. This happens even after I uninstall/reinstall the GTalk plugin. Anyone know why this is happening?

    Read the article

  • Mozilla Firefox : sortie de la deuxième bêta du SDK de JetPack, la nouvelle technologie de développement d'extensions pour Firefox

    Mozilla Firefox : sortie de la deuxième bêta du SDK de JetPack La nouvelle technologie de développement d'extensions pour Firefox Mise à jour du 31/01/2011 par Idelways L'équipe de Jetpack vient d'annoncer la disponibilité de la deuxième bêta de son SDK. Un kit de développement destiné à offrir un moyen plus simple pour créer des extensions pour Firefox (lire ci-devant) En plus de la résolution de certains bugs, cette version embarque un ensemble d'améliorations architecturales. La plus notable étant l'intégration du support de l'API « CommonJS Asynchronous Module » du projet CommonJS. Cette API of...

    Read the article

  • Source Browsing in FireFox

    - by lavanyadeepak
    Source Browsing in FireFox Just casually observed this a few minutes back with my Mozilla Firefox 3.6.3. When you do a view source of any  page in Internet Explorer it just renders as editable inoperative HTML. However in Firefox the hyperlinks are shown clickable and active. When you click on any hyperlink the most obvious and expected output would be that the target page would appear in one of the new tab in the parent browser. However the View Source window refreshed with the HTML source of the new page. I believe this gesture of Firefox would help us to take a journey back into Lynx Text Browsing in a way.

    Read the article

  • Recent Hotmail Update is crashing FireFox. Is there a fix available

    - by hcabnettek
    I have latest version of FireFox. It has always worked fine using HOTMAIL until recently. I check a checkbox on my items list and FireFox chokes. Thinking back it seems to have started after a recent FireBug update so that may be related. I am liking the older version of Firebug better by the way but thats another post alltogether. Is anyone else having this problem? Is there a fix available? Thanks, ~ck in San Diego

    Read the article

  • Firefox 16 disponible : ajout du Developer Toolbar et d'un ramasse-miettes incrémental pour JavaScript

    Firefox s'offre une ligne de commande le Developer Toolbar permet d'interagir avec une page, la bêta de la version 16 sort Ce sont les vacances pour certains, mais pas pour la fondation Mozilla qui reste fidèle à son cycle de développement rapide de Firefox. À peine la version 15 du navigateur disponible, son successeur pointe déjà le bout de son nez. Mozilla vient de faire passer Firefox 16 du Canal Aurora au Canal bêta, et vante déjà la nouveauté phare qui sera disponible au sein du navigateur. Firefox 16 dispose d'une nouvelle ligne de commande, permettant aux développeurs d'interagir de façon ...

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65  | Next Page >