Search Results

Search found 13752 results on 551 pages for 'ip protocol'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 6/551 | < Previous Page | 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13  | Next Page >

  • Display maintenance site to requesters based on their IP address

    - by user64294
    Hi all. I would like to set a special configuration in our apache web server. I would like to display sites to the users according to their IP addresses. We plan to upgrade our web sites. During the upgrade we'll put a maintenance site: so all the users which will connect to our web sites will get this site. There are 200 websites affected by the upgrade, so I don't want to change apache settings for each one. In order to test the upgrade i need to set apache to let only my IP address to access to asked site. If my IP address is a.b.c.d and if i ask for test.com i want to see it. but all other users, having a different IP address, should get the maintenane site even if they look for test.com. Our webserver is hosted out of the office (ovh.com france). The testers are the developers at our office and me. We can take some sites and enable them for test in which we implement IP restrictions in each website: the idea is on these websites, if the visitor's IP address is different from our office IP address we redirect this visitor to our maintenance website else we display the website. Is there a way to do this? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • IP addresses not listed for IIS website bindings

    - by Svinn
    Recently purchased a windows cloud server godaddy. Now i installed iis7 and all other required software. And i have 50.62.1.89 and 2 more public ips. Also i have a private ip 10.1.0.2. Now the problem is am unable to access any website through any public ip. All my public ips are opening default website only. also i cant see pubic ips for IIS website bindings. Only my private ip listed for IIS binding. And in my server also public opening only default website. But am able to open websites using private ip. But my public ip addresses pointed to my server correctly. am able to open my server using remote desktop using public ip. Also as i said already public ip opening default website from IIS without problem. Please help me. Am confused for last 2 days.

    Read the article

  • SharePoint 2010 Hosting :: Sending SMS Alerts in SharePoint 2010 Over Office Mobile Service Protocol (OMS)

    - by mbridge
    In this post, I want to share the exciting news of SharePoint's 2010 new feature. Finally it's possible to send SMS directly from SharePoint to mobile phones. The advantages of sending SMS instead of Email messages are obvious: SMS alerts or reminders that are received on mobile phones are more preferred than Email messages that can be lost in the mass of spam. The interface is standard as it's very similar to previous versions of the product. Adjustments are easy to do, simply enter the address of the Office Mobile Service (OMS) web-service which you want to use for sending messages, then specify the connection parameters. Further details on Office Mobile Service is available below. The Test Service button checks if OMS web-service is accessible using provided URL (user name and password are not verified). This check is needed because OMS web-service URL depends on the mobile operator and country. It's now possible to select the method of sending alerts in alerts settings. Email option is selected by default. Alerts delivery method is displayed in the list of existing alerts. Office Mobile Service (OMS) SharePoint 2010 uses exterior servers similar to SMTP servers for sending SMS alerts. However, Microsoft started development and promotion of their own protocol instead of using existing ones. That is how Office Mobile Service (OMS) appeared. This open protocol enables clients to send text and multimedia messages (mobile messages) remotely to the server which processes these messages and delivers them to mobile phones.  Typical scenario of utilizing this protocol is data transfer between computer application and mobile phone. The recipient can answer messages and the server in return will deliver the answer by SMTP protocol, i.e. by email.  Key quality of this protocol is that it's built on base of HTPP(S) and SOAP protocols.     This means that in fact SMS gateway must support typified web-service. What do you get from web-service? What you get is the ability to send SMS from any platform you want.  The protocol is being developed at the moment and version 0.2 from 08/28/2009 was available when the article was published.  For promotion of their protocol and simplifying server search, Microsoft represented web-service http://messaging.office.microsoft.com/HostingProviders.aspx that helps to receive the list of providers, which supports OMS protocol and message delivery to your operator.  All you need to do is decide which provider to use, complete the agreement, then adjust the SharePoint connection parameters and start working.  Some providers advertise themselves not only for clients but for mobile operators as well. They offer automatic adding to the list of the Office Mobile Service Providers.  To view the full specifications of OMS, please go to http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd774103.aspx.

    Read the article

  • Metaobject protocol:Why is it known as an important concept

    - by sushant
    Metaobject protocol is protocol for metaobjects in a programming languages. Although I understand it on simple terms, I want to know the reason and a summary of real world usage patterns of this protocol. So, why exactly is metaobject and more importantly metaobject protocol is such a good idea. I want to know the problem which led to its evolution and also, its high power usage. Opinions as well as general overview/description/alternate explanations are also welcome.

    Read the article

  • protocol parsing in c

    - by nomad.alien
    I have been playing around with trying to implement some protocol decoders, but each time I run into a "simple" problem and I feel the way I am solving the problem is not optimal and there must be a better way to do things. I'm using C. Currently I'm using some canned data and reading it in as a file, but later on it would be via TCP or UDP. Here's the problem. I'm currently playing with a binary protocol at work. All fields are 8 bits long. The first field(8bits) is the packet type. So I read in the first 8 bits and using a switch/case I call a function to read in the rest of the packet as I then know the size/structure of it. BUT...some of these packets have nested packets inside them, so when I encounter that specific packet I then have to read another 8-16 bytes have another switch/case to see what the next packet type is and on and on. (Luckily the packets are only nested 2 or 3 deep). Only once I have the whole packet decoded can I handle it over to my state machine for processing. I guess this can be a more general question as well. How much data do you have to read at a time from the socket? As much as possible? As much as what is "similar" in the protocol headers? So even though this protocol is fairly basic, my code is a whole bunch of switch/case statements and I do a lot of reading from the file/socket which I feel is not optimal. My main aim is to make this decoder as fast as possible. To the more experienced people out there, is this the way to go or is there a better way which I just haven't figured out yet? Any elegant solution to this problem?

    Read the article

  • Server IP Release Time

    - by DanSpd
    Hello, With router IP Address does not change at all as long as you do not touch modem. If computer is connected to modem directly IP changes every hour or so. Whats causing it and how to fix. P.S. I am talking about WAN IP and not LAN IP

    Read the article

  • Server IP Release Time

    - by DanSpd
    Hello, With router IP Address does not change at all as long as you do not touch modem. If computer is connected to modem directly IP changes every hour or so. Whats causing it and how to fix. P.S. I am talking about WAN IP and not LAN IP

    Read the article

  • OpenDNS IP Conflict

    - by Paddy
    I have downloaded the OpenDNS client and it was working great till today. Shows me this error: dynamic IP update failed with message !yours or "Your IP address is taken by another user." I am pretty sure i'll get away with the problem by just restarting my connection as i'll be assigned a new dynamic ip. But I wonder how this is happening in the first place. Shouldn't Dynamic IP be unique for everyone?

    Read the article

  • How to get a static ip address on adsl

    - by user23950
    I tried it before by setting the ip address manually. And I used this IP Address: 192.168.1.33 I reboot and tried if I can connect to the internet, but no luck. It must be set to obtain your ip address automatically. Is there any way on getting a static ip address on an adsl/dsl

    Read the article

  • New IP address with TSOCKS

    - by Matthew Downey
    I am using tsocks on my Ubuntu machine and I have it all set up so that if I run wget -q -O - checkip.dyndns.org|sed -e 's/.*Current IP Address: //' -e 's/<.*$//' in my normal shell I get my real IP address, and if I run tsocks wget -q -O - checkip.dyndns.org|sed -e 's/.*Current IP Address: //' -e 's/<.*$//' I get another IP address like I should. My question is how do I make the tsocks command return with a different 'different address'; in other words establish a new identity.

    Read the article

  • Multiple IP stacks

    - by Aditya Sehgal
    I have a linux box with two ethernet interfaces (eth0 & eth1) with two corresponding IPs. As per my understanding, currently they are served by 1 IP stack. Is it possible to install another IP stack with IP Stack 1 handling ethernet interface eth0 and the other IP stack handling eth1.

    Read the article

  • Redirect all outgoing traffic on port 80 to a different IP on the same server

    - by Spacedust
    I have multiple IP addresses on the same server and I would like to redirect all outgoing traffic on port 80 to a different IP on the same server just no to use always main IP. Currently I'm using this: /sbin/iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j SNAT --to-source IP; and it works well, but it redirects everything and when I make backups over SSH backup it's failing. System: CentOS 5.8 64-bit

    Read the article

  • Assign a secondary IP address to a Windows machine using DHCP

    - by IndigoFire
    Is it possible to configure dhcpd (on a Linux box) to assign a Windows PC 2 separate IP configurations? Right now I've configured the two IP addresses manually and it does exactly what's needed, but I can't figure out how to achieve the same thing with DHCP. For example, is it possible to set up a virtual interface that piggy-backs onto the first interface and gets its own configuration? Alternatively, is it possible to run a script upon getting IP values from DHCP that would then be able to configure the secondary IP?

    Read the article

  • question about IP address

    - by baddogai
    i know how IP basically works, and knows that an IP address composed of a network ID portion and a host ID portion, but when I type a IP address ,say "8.8.8.8" into the web browser, i DIDN'T supply any subnet mask information, so how does the browser know where the dividing line is between the network ID and host ID? since 8.8.8.8 may mean 8.8.8.8/8, 8.8.8.8/24 etc. In a nutshell, the IP address I supplied is ambiguous.

    Read the article

  • How to change IP Location information?

    - by jimm
    How to change IP Location information? Hello, When viewing website whois through whois.domaintools.com, under the Server Stats tab, there is the IP Location information and looks like this: IP Location: - Netherlands - Dedicated/collocated/various Hosting Customers What to do to change the IP Location information after the word Netherlands? Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • How to find the real IP to which IPVS is routing a virtual IP

    - by Wayne Conrad
    I'm trying to find a problem server hiding behind a virtual IP (using LVS/ipvs). I've got a test program that sends requests to the virtual IP until it gets the bad response, but how can I tell to which real IP a request to the virtual IP got routed? On the box doing the virtual IP magic, here's the virtual IP configuration (for the service I care about): IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096) Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn ... TCP 10.1.0.254:5025 nq -> 10.1.0.5:5025 Route 1 0 1 -> 10.1.0.6:5025 Route 1 0 5 -> 10.1.0.7:5025 Route 1 0 2 -> 10.1.0.9:5025 Local 1 0 3 -> 10.1.0.11:5025 Route 1 0 3 ... My client program is sending TCP requests to 10.1.0.254:5025, usually getting a good response but sometimes a bad response. With this few servers, I could send my request to each server in turn until I discover the culprit, but I wonder if that technique will scale as we add servers. What means exist for me to find out where requests got routed? Kernel: Linux 2.6.32 OS: Debian testing (whatever that's called these days). ipvsadm is version 1.25, compiled with ipvs v1.2.1

    Read the article

  • IP to IP forwarding with iptables [centos]

    - by FunkyChicken
    I have 2 servers. Server 1 with ip 1.1.1.1 and server 2 with ip 2.2.2.2 My domain example.com points to 1.1.1.1 at the moment, but very soon I'm going to switch to ip 2.2.2.2. I have already setup a low TTL for domain example.com, but some people will still hit the old ip a after I change the ip address of the domain. Now both machines run centos 5.8 with iptables and nginx as a webserver. I want to forward all traffic that still hits server 1.1.1.1 to 2.2.2.2 so there won't be any downtime. Now I found this tutorial: http://www.debuntu.org/how-to-redirecting-network-traffic-a-new-ip-using-iptables but I cannot seem to get it working. I have enabled ip forwarding: echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward After that I ran these 2 commands: /sbin/iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -s 1.1.1.1 -p tcp --dport 80 -j DNAT --to-destination 2.2.2.2:80 /sbin/iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j MASQUERADE But when I load http://1.1.1.1 in my browser, I still get the pages hosted on 1.1.1.1 and not the content from 2.2.2.2. What am I doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • Android and Protocol Buffers

    - by spaceboy2000
    I am writing an Android application that would both store data and communicate with a server using protocol buffers. However, the stock implementation of protocol buffers compiled with the LITE flag (in both the JAR library and the generated .java files) has an overhead of ~30 KB, where the program itself is only ~30 KB. In other words, protocol buffers doubled the program size. Searching online, I found a reference to an Android specific implementation. Unfortunately, there seems to be no documentation for it, and the code generated from the standard .proto file is incompatible with it. Has anyone used it? How do I generate code from a .proto file for this implementation? Are there any other lightweight alternatives?

    Read the article

  • iPhone: Sharing protocol/delegate code

    - by pion
    I have the following code protocol snippets: @protocol FooDelegate; @interface Foo : UIViewController { id delegate; } ... @protocol FooDelegate ... // method 1 ... // method 2 ... @end Also, the following code which implements FooDelegate: @interface Bar1 : UIViewController { ... } @interface Bar2 : UITableViewController { ... } It turns out the implementation of FooDelegate is the same on both Bar1 and Bar2 classes. I currently just copy FooDelegate implementation code from Bar1 to Bar2. How do I structure/implement in such a way that Bar1 and Bar2 share the same code in a single code base (not as currently with 2 copies) since they are the same? Thanks in advance for your help.

    Read the article

  • Cast an instance of a class to a @protocol in Objective-C

    - by Ford
    I have an object (a UIViewController) which may or may not conform to a protocol I've defined. I know I can determine if the object conforms to the protocol, then safely call the method: if([self.myViewController conformsToProtocol:@protocol(MyProtocol)]) { [self.myViewController protocolMethod]; // <-- warning here } However, XCode shows a warning: warning 'UIViewController' may not respond to '-protocolMethod' What's the right way to prevent this warning? I can't seem to cast self.myViewController as a MyProtocol class. Update Andy's answer below is close, but includes an unneccesary '*'. The following works: [(id<MyProtocol>)self.myViewController protocolMethod];

    Read the article

  • Windows Server: specifying the default IP address when NIC has multiple addresses

    - by Cédric Boivin
    I have a Windows Server which has ~10 IP addresses statically bound. The problem is I don't know how to specify the default IP address. Sometimes when I assign a new address to the NIC, the default IP address changes with the last IP entered in the advanced IP configuration on the NIC. This has the effect (since I use NAT) that the outgoing public IP changes too. Even though this problem is currently on Windows Server 2008, I've had the same problem with a Windows Server 2003. How can you set the default IP address on a NIC when it has multiple IP addresses bound? I remark something. When i check route print i see is it there the problem ? 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.x.x 192.168.99.49 261 if i want the default ip be example : 192.168.99.100 There is my route. Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.99.1 192.168.99.49 261 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 10.10.10.10 261 10.10.10.10 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.10.10.10 261 10.10.10.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.10.10.10 261 192.168.99.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.49 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.51 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.52 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.53 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.54 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.55 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.56 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.57 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.58 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.59 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.60 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.61 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.62 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.64 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.65 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.66 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.67 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.68 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.70 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.71 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.100 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.108 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.109 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.112 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 10.10.10.10 261 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.10.10.10 261 I need to be certain, when i go on internet i go with the 192.168.99.100 how i do that ?

    Read the article

  • Windows Server: specifying the default IP address when NIC has multiple addresses

    - by Cédric Boivin
    I have a Windows Server which has ~10 IP addresses statically bound. The problem is I don't know how to specify the default IP address. Sometimes when I assign a new address to the NIC, the default IP address changes with the last IP entered in the advanced IP configuration on the NIC. This has the effect (since I use NAT) that the outgoing public IP changes too. Even though this problem is currently on Windows Server 2008, I've had the same problem with a Windows Server 2003. How can you set the default IP address on a NIC when it has multiple IP addresses bound? I remark something. When i check route print i see is it there the problem ? 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.x.x 192.168.99.49 261 if i want the default ip be example : 192.168.99.100 There is my route. Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.99.1 192.168.99.49 261 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 10.10.10.10 261 10.10.10.10 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.10.10.10 261 10.10.10.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.10.10.10 261 192.168.99.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.49 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.51 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.52 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.53 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.54 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.55 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.56 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.57 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.58 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.59 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.60 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.61 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.62 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.64 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.65 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.66 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.67 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.68 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.70 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.71 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.100 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.108 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.109 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.112 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 192.168.99.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 10.10.10.10 261 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.99.49 261 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.10.10.10 261 I need to be certain, when i go on internet i go with the 192.168.99.100 how i do that ?

    Read the article

  • memcached append() php ubuntu - bad protocol

    - by awongh
    I am running ubuntu gutsy(7.1) , php5 and I am trying to get memcached running locally. I installed everything as per the docs: memcached daemon, php PECL extension, libevent, etc. But now I can only run half of the example script for memcached append(): <?php $m = new Memcached(); $m->addServer('localhost', 11211); $m->setOption(Memcached::OPT_COMPRESSION, false); $m->set('foo', 'abc'); $m->append('foo', 'def'); var_dump($m->get('foo')); ?> the script terminates @ append() with an RES_BAD_PROTOCOL error message. It still runs the get(). I don't know why memcached would otherwise be working fine (connect, set, get - with the correct value of 'abc') and not work for append. it also doesnt work with prepend. I believe I have the setup correct, but I am not sure. Maybe there are compatibility problems between the versions of the dependecies? thanks much

    Read the article

  • How can I set up multiple dynamic users to update a single network's dynamic IP

    - by d3vid
    On my home network we are allocated a dynamic IP. I want to configure ddclient (or an equivalent) to send IP updates to DNS-O-Matic/OpenDNS only when I am on my home network. I do not want to send IP updates when I'm on my office network. Can this be done? I am prepared to use different FLOSS software or a different free DNS service. Additionally, there are multiple users who may be on the home network or away on other networks. How can we configure ddclient on each machine so that whoever is on the home network updates the IP (i.e. so we don't have to rely on a particular machine being on the network to update the IP). OpenDNS support have said we can't simply install updater software on each machine.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13  | Next Page >