Search Results

Search found 2149 results on 86 pages for 'peter di cecco'.

Page 6/86 | < Previous Page | 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13  | Next Page >

  • Dependency injection: How to sell it

    - by Mel
    Let it be known that I am a big fan of dependency injection (DI) and automated testing. I could talk all day about it. Background Recently, our team just got this big project that is to built from scratch. It is a strategic application with complex business requirements. Of course, I wanted it to be nice and clean, which for me meant: maintainable and testable. So I wanted to use DI. Resistance The problem was in our team, DI is taboo. It has been brought up a few times, but the gods do not approve. But that did not discourage me. My Move This may sound weird but third-party libraries are usually not approved by our architect team (think: "thou shalt not speak of Unity, Ninject, NHibernate, Moq or NUnit, lest I cut your finger"). So instead of using an established DI container, I wrote an extremely simple container. It basically wired up all your dependencies on startup, injects any dependencies (constructor/property) and disposed any disposable objects at the end of the web request. It was extremely lightweight and just did what we needed. And then I asked them to review it. The Response Well, to make it short. I was met with heavy resistance. The main argument was, "We don't need to add this layer of complexity to an already complex project". Also, "It's not like we will be plugging in different implementations of components". And "We want to keep it simple, if possible just stuff everything into one assembly. DI is an uneeded complexity with no benefit". Finally, My Question How would you handle my situation? I am not good in presenting my ideas, and I would like to know how people would present their argument. Of course, I am assuming that like me, you prefer to use DI. If you don't agree, please do say why so I can see the other side of the coin. It would be really interesting to see the point of view of someone who disagrees. Update Thank you for everyone's answers. It really puts things into perspective. It's nice enough to have another set of eyes to give you feedback, fifteen is really awesome! This are really great answers and helped me see the issue from different sides, but I can only choose one answer, so I will just pick the top voted one. Thanks everyone for taking the time to answer. I have decided that it is probably not the best time to implement DI, and we are not ready for it. Instead, I will concentrate my efforts on making the design testable and attempt to present automated unit testing. I am aware that writing tests is additional overhead and if ever it is decided that the additional overhead is not worth it, personally I would still see it as a win situation since the design is still testable. And if ever testing or DI is a choice in future, the design can easily handle it.

    Read the article

  • Why do I need an IoC container as opposed to straightforward DI code?

    - by Vadim
    I've been using Dependency Injection (DI) for awhile, injecting either in a constructor, property, or method. I've never felt a need to use an Inversion of Control (IoC) container. However, the more I read, the more pressure I feel from the community to use an IoC container. I played with .NET containers like StructureMap, NInject, Unity, and Funq. I still fail to see how an IoC container is going to benefit / improve my code. I'm also afraid to start using a container at work because many of my co-workers will see code which they don't understand. Many of them may be reluctant to learn new technology. Please, convince me that I need to use an IoC container. I'm going to use these arguments when I talk to my fellow developers at work.

    Read the article

  • What is the business case for a dependency injection (DI) framework?

    - by kalkie
    At my company we want to start using a dependency injection (DI) framework for managing our dependencies. I have some difficulty with explaining the business value of such a framework. Currently I have come up with these reasons. Less source code, delete all the builder patterns in the code. Increase in flexibility. Easier to switch dependencies. Better separation of concern. The framework is responsible for creating instances instead of our code. Has anybody else had to persuade management? How did you do that? What reasons did you use?

    Read the article

  • Problem with command line in windows

    - by Hoang Pham
    I copy the cmd.exe to a new location, then I run it to get the current directory location at that folder. But just recently, there is always this message: Impossibile trovare il testo del messaggio per il numero di messaggio 0x2350 nel file di messaggio per Application. Impossibile trovare il testo del messaggio per il numero di messaggio 0x2334 nel file di messaggio per Application. C:\cygwin\home\Hoang> Someone know how to solve it?

    Read the article

  • Which single IoC/DI container would you recommend using and why?

    - by Rob G
    I'm asking this question because it's a good way to gauge how the community at large feels about the various containers/frameworks and why. Also, whilst my expertise may lie in .Net development, I am very interested in which frameworks are popular (and why) in other languages. If I feel the need to start digging into Java for instance, then I'd like to hit the ground running with good (comfortable) knowledge that I'm starting in the right direction. Does Ruby even need one with all its magnificent dynamicism? I have my own opinions on the .Net front, and will probably add my own personal favourite in an answer below, but I'm interested in all languages and opinions here. With all that in mind, could you please state only one IoC/DI framework that you use and recommend with the language of choice (Java/Ruby/.Net/Smalltalk etc.) and your reasoning for your choice, and if someone has already answered your particular flavour, then you can just vote it up and add comments to it so that anyone looking for advice in future and see which frameworks are more than likely to work for them once they read your reasoning. I'm hoping that over time, the best ones will bubble up to the top. I realise that this question doesn't have only one correct answer, so I won't be choosing one - the community will decide which framework gets the most votes and why. Of course, if you really feel strongly opposed to a particular brand, you could take the reputation hit and vote it down too, and this question can serve as a true wiki-style entry for research into this field. Remember, only one IoC per answer you write please - if you feel the need to promote two frameworks, then write two answers with your reasoning inside for each choice - then others in the community can agree or disagree with you.

    Read the article

  • Gestire la relazione con il fornitore: strategie, processi, strumenti

    - by antonella.buonagurio(at)oracle.com
    Si é svolto il 3 Marzo un interessante incontro sul tema delle relazioni fra fornitori ed ufficio acquisti. Cesare Businelli , Direttore Generale Italia dell' European Institute of Purchasing Management ha illustrato, in un tempo purtoppo inferiore al necessario, come gestire le relazioni e la collaborazione con i fornitori strategici per creare valore, portando numerosi esempi di successo e stimolando l'uditorio, composto dai responsabili acquisti di piu di 20 aziende. A seguire Lino Campofiorito - Procurement Solutions Sales Consultant di Oracle ha illustrato alcune delle soluzioni informatiche a supporto. Qui potrete trovare le slides. Al termine dell'incontro molte domande per i relatori a conferma dell'interesse del tema.  Oracle Procurement Channel View more presentations from antobng82.

    Read the article

  • Oracle Hyperion Customer Briefing 2011

    - by antonella.buonagurio(at)oracle.com
    Lo scorso 24 febbraio a Milano e il 9 marzo a Roma si è tenuto l'Oracle Hyperion Customer Briefing 2011 un workshop riservato ai clienti Oracle su tutte le novità Oracle Hyperion EPM SYstem 11.1.2. La giornata si è sviluppata attraverso un percorso guidato di quattro sessioni tematiche su  come poter migliorare ulteriormente processi di management nelle  aziende in tutti gli ambiti di interesse.  

    Read the article

  • Windows Embedded in Padua

    - by Valter Minute
    Martedì 8 Giugno, presso l’università di Padova terrò un intervento su Windows CE all’interno dell’evento: “Workshop sulle nuove architetture per sistemi embedded”. All’interno dello stesso evento altre sessioni tratteranno dell’architettura ARM e in particolare dei nuovi core Cortex A8, di applicazioni avanzate e di Linux Embedded. L’agenda (fitta e interessante) e il link per le iscrizioni potete trovarli qui: http://www.arrowitaly.it/training-events/training-events/dettaglio-training/article/workshop-sulle-nuove-architetture-per-sistemi-embedded/?tx_ttnews[backPid]=1336&cHash=ae34e269e1

    Read the article

  • Seminario "ABC - Activity Based Costing in Italia"

    - by claudiac.caramelli
    Martedì 5 novembre si è svolto un interessante seminario organizzato da Oracle in collaborazione con Assocontroller. Sono stati approfonditi temi riguardanti la metodologia ABC ed è stato discusso in modo oggettivo sulle problematiche, le esperienze e le evoluzioni di tale approccio. Il primo intervento, a cura di Giorgio Cinciripini (consulente e presidente di Assocontroller) ha aperto la strada alla presentazione del Prof. Alberto Bubbio, professore in economia aziendale presso l'Università Liuc. Sono stati successivamente presentati 3 case history (il caso Sandvik, Atac Patrimonio e Marazzi Group), che hanno permesso di approfondire e meglio spiegare come questa metodologia possa aiutare un'azienda a controllare i costi, per arrivare a gestirli in modo dinamico e finalizzato a seguire razionalmente l'andamento del mercato e del valore che il mercato attribuisce al prodotto o servizio che si desidera vendere. Una sala interessata e attenta agli interventi, responsi più che ottimi... Ci sono tutte le premesse per ripetere l'evento!

    Read the article

  • OCAD 2013, rassegna stampa&more

    - by claudiac.caramelli
    Vi segnaliamo un interessante articolo su ImpresaCity sull'Oracle Cloud Applications Day 2013: http://bit.ly/1eE3a5Q Roberto Bonino ci racconta come il Cloud si stia sempre di più diffondendo nelle aziende italiane e la visione degli esperti che sono intervenuti. E' stato anche aggiornato il canale youtube di Oracle Italia con due nuovi video registrati il 28 ottobre. Paola Provvisier ci racconta QUI la completezza delle soluzioni HCM, mentre Giovanni Ravasio, Country Leader di Oracle Applications Italia, insieme a Fabrizio Pessina (Boston Consulting Group) e a Paolo Daperno (Illycaffè), fanno QUI il punto della situazione sull'offerta Cloud di Oracle, sul panorama Cloud in Italia e perchè le aziende scelgono nuovi servizi per implementare e migliorare la propria realtà.

    Read the article

  • How to do dependency Injection and conditional object creation based on type?

    - by Pradeep
    I have a service endpoint initialized using DI. It is of the following style. This end point is used across the app. public class CustomerService : ICustomerService { private IValidationService ValidationService { get; set; } private ICustomerRepository Repository { get; set; } public CustomerService(IValidationService validationService,ICustomerRepository repository) { ValidationService = validationService; Repository = repository; } public void Save(CustomerDTO customer) { if (ValidationService.Valid(customer)) Repository.Save(customer); } Now, With the changing requirements, there are going to be different types of customers (Legacy/Regular). The requirement is based on the type of the customer I have to validate and persist the customer in a different way (e.g. if Legacy customer persist to LegacyRepository). The wrong way to do this will be to break DI and do somthing like public void Save(CustomerDTO customer) { if(customer.Type == CustomerTypes.Legacy) { if (LegacyValidationService.Valid(customer)) LegacyRepository.Save(customer); } else { if (ValidationService.Valid(customer)) Repository.Save(customer); } } My options to me seems like DI all possible IValidationService and ICustomerRepository and switch based on type, which seems wrong. The other is to change the service signature to Save(IValidationService validation, ICustomerRepository repository, CustomerDTO customer) which is an invasive change. Break DI. Use the Strategy pattern approach for each type and do something like: validation= CustomerValidationServiceFactory.GetStratedgy(customer.Type); validation.Valid(customer) but now I have a static method which needs to know how to initialize different services. I am sure this is a very common problem, What is the right way to solve this without changing service signatures or breaking DI?

    Read the article

  • Is dependency injection by hand a better alternative to composition and polymorphism?

    - by Drake Clarris
    First, I'm an entry level programmer; In fact, I'm finishing an A.S. degree with a final capstone project over the summer. In my new job, when there isn't some project for me to do (they're waiting to fill the team with more new hires), I've been given books to read and learn from while I wait - some textbooks, others not so much (like Code Complete). After going through these books, I've turned to the internet to learn as much as possible, and started learning about SOLID and DI (we talked some about Liskov's substitution principle, but not much else SOLID ideas). So as I've learned, I sat down to do to learn better, and began writing some code to utilize DI by hand (there are no DI frameworks on the development computers). Thing is, as I do it, I notice it feels familiar... and it seems like it is very much like work I've done in the past using composition of abstract classes using polymorphism. Am I missing a bigger picture here? Is there something about DI (at least by hand) that goes beyond that? I understand the possibility of having configurations not in code of some DI frameworks having some great benefits as far as changing things without having to recompile, but when doing it by hand, I'm not sure if it's any different than stated above... Some insight into this would be very helpful!

    Read the article

  • Oracle Business Intelligence Applications

    Scopri le caratteristiche di Oracle BI Applications, la strategia, l'offerta e i vantaggi delle applicazioni di analitiche di Oracle. Con Oracle BI Applications è possibile valorizzare al meglio il patrimonio informativo delle applicazioni Oracle E-Business Suite, PeopleSoft, Siebel e SAP, ottenendo le informazioni necessarie a prendere le decisioni migliori.

    Read the article

  • Rassegna stampa: JD Edwards e 01net.CIO

    - by Claudia Caramelli-Oracle
    Hai sete di notizie?01net.CIO dedica ampio spazio a Oracle JD Edwards Enterprise One. Ti segnaliamo due articoli con le interviste a Gianluca De Cristofaro, Sales Director Applications MSE Italy, e Paolo Borriello, Master Principal Sales Consultant, circa l'importanza e la forza di questa soluzione.26 Maggio02 Giugno Il 26 Giugno ti aspettiamo all'evento E' Ora di Jd Edwards! al Salone dei Tessuti a Milano e in diretta streaming dagli uffici Oracle di Roma. Per maggiori informazioni e iscrizione, collegati QUI. Stay connected! Se sei un utente twitter cerca #oraJDE per rimanere sempre informato.

    Read the article

  • Unconventional webapps con GWT/Elemental WebRTC e WebGL (parte 2)

    Unconventional webapps con GWT/Elemental WebRTC e WebGL (parte 2) Seconda parte del'intervento di Alberto Mancini del GDG Firenze: realizzata l'app di base, grazie a GWT e NyARToolkit, sarà possibile aggiungere della realtà aumentata direttamente sullo streaming video utilizzando dei marker. Post con esempi di codice all'indirizzo jooink.blogspot.it From: GoogleDevelopers Views: 28 2 ratings Time: 19:08 More in Science & Technology

    Read the article

  • Woolrich Prezzi che sono perfetti per tutte le donne

    - by WoolrichParka
    Gli strati Parka Woolrich Prezzi Woolrich sono realizzati con il 100% verso il basso e con la miscela remove ragionevole sull'area rivestimento esterno che tiene i siti per più innovativi clienti.L Woolrich Arctic strati sono sviluppati con la tonalità tradizionale che può essere anche in aggiunta al cappuccio Woolrich Parka e creare femmine in reasonable.Now prospettiva elegante, si mostra una vasta gamma Woolrich Outlet Bologna di disegni di Woolrich Parka Men per la vostra scelta, che sono tutti un valore di acquisto nel design e prezzo.wufengfengmaple36

    Read the article

  • GDL Italy 20121107 - Unconvential webapp con GWT/Elemental, WebRCT e WebGL

    GDL Italy 20121107 - Unconvential webapp con GWT/Elemental, WebRCT e WebGL In questo video Alberto Mancini del GDG Firenze ci spiega come realizzare applicazioni web con GWT ed Elemental, capaci di acquisire il flusso video di una webcam sfruttando le nuove API WebRTC ed in grado di aggiungere effetti 3D grazie a WebGL. From: GoogleDevelopers Views: 39 3 ratings Time: 23:01 More in Science & Technology

    Read the article

  • Webcast su Fusion CRM – il primo appuntamento è adesso on demand!

    - by Silvia Valgoi
    Se non hai potuto seguire il webcast su Fusion CRM (in italiano!) o se lo vuoi rivedere, ecco qui il link. Il webcast rappresenta il primo appuntamento dedicato ad approfondire le novità di Fusion CRM, il nuovo standard per gestire Vendite e Marketing e per scoprire in che modo una revisione dei processi commerciali possa garantire produttività del team di vendita ed una efficace integrazione con i processi di marketing. Il prossimo appuntamento è per il 3 luglio sempre alle 12:00. In quell’occasione ci si focalizzerà più su un modulo specifico di Fusion CRM: Oracle Fusion Territory Management che rappresenta la più completa soluzione per la gestiore dei territori e delle aree. Registrati qui. Non perdere l’ultimo appuntamento prima delle vacanze!

    Read the article

  • Is there a better way to organize my module tests that avoids an explosion of new source files?

    - by luser droog
    I've got a neat (so I thought) way of having each of my modules produce a unit-test executable if compiled with the -DTESTMODULE flag. This flag guards a main() function that can access all static data and functions in the module, without #including a C file. From the README: -- Modules -- The various modules were written and tested separately before being coupled together to achieve the necessary basic functionality. Each module retains its unit-test, its main() function, guarded by #ifdef TESTMODULE. `make test` will compile and execute all the unit tests, producing copious output, but importantly exitting with an appropriate success or failure code, so the `make test` command will fail if any of the tests fail. Module TOC __________ test obj src header structures CONSTANTS ---- --- --- --- -------------------- m m.o m.c m.h mfile mtab TABSZ s s.o s.c s.h stack STACKSEGSZ v v.o v.c v.h saverec_ f.o f.c f.h file ob ob.o ob.c ob.h object ar ar.o ar.c ar.h array st st.o st.c st.h string di di.o di.c di.h dichead dictionary nm nm.o nm.c nm.h name gc gc.o gc.c gc.h garbage collector itp itp.c itp.h context osunix.o osunix.c osunix.h unix-dependent functions It's compile by a tricky bit of makefile, m:m.c ob.h ob.o err.o $(CORE) itp.o $(OP) cc $(CFLAGS) -DTESTMODULE $(LDLIBS) -o $@ $< err.o ob.o s.o ar.o st.o v.o di.o gc.o nm.o itp.o $(OP) f.o where the module is compiled with its own C file plus every other object file except itself. But it's creating difficulties for the kindly programmer who offered to write the Autotools files for me. So the obvious way to make it "less weird" would be to bust-out all the main functions into separate source files. But, but ... Do I gotta?

    Read the article

  • NHibernate - joining on a subquery using ICriteria

    - by owensymes.mp
    I have a SQL query that I need to represent using NHibernate's ICriteria API. SELECT u.Id as Id, u.Login as Login, u.FirstName as FirstName, u.LastName as LastName, gm.UserGroupId_FK as UserGroupId, inner.Data1, inner.Data2, inner.Data3 FROM dbo.User u inner join dbo.GroupMember gm on u.Id = gm.UserAnchorId_FK left join ( SELECT di.UserAnchorId_FK, sum(di.Data1) as Data1, sum(di.Data2) as Data2, sum(di.Data3) as Data3 FROM dbo.DailyInfo di WHERE di.Date between '2009-04-01' and '2009-06-01' GROUP BY di.UserAnchorId_FK ) inner ON inner.UserAnchorId_FK = u.Id WHERE gm.UserGroupId_FK = 195 Attempts so far have included mapping 'User' and 'DailyInfo' classes (my entities) and making a DailyInfo object a property of the User object. However, how to map the foreign key relationship between them is still a mystery, ie <one-to-one></one-to-one> <one-to-many></one-to-many> <generator class="foreign"><param name="property">Id</param></generator> (!) Solutions on the web are generally to do with subqueries within a WHERE clause, however I need to left join on this subquery instead to ensure NULL values are returned for rows that do not join. I have the feeling that I should be using a Criteria for the outer query, then forming a 'join' with a DetachedCriteria to represent the subquery?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13  | Next Page >