Search Results

Search found 10060 results on 403 pages for 'column'.

Page 60/403 | < Previous Page | 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67  | Next Page >

  • Subsonic : Same column name different tables

    - by John Transformer
    Hi, I have a query where I need to do a "Where" clause for two different columns in two different tables but subsonic creates the same parametrized parameter name for both which is causing an issue. How can I fix this? string _RawSql = new Select() .From(Tables.Table1) .InnerJoin(Tables.Table2) .InnerJoin(Table3.SidColumn, Table2.Table3SidColumn) .Where(Table1.SidColumn).IsEqualTo(2) .And(Table3.SidColumn).IsEqualTo(1) .BuildSqlStatement(); The query this is creating is SELECT .... FROM [dbo].[Table1] INNER JOIN [dbo].[Table2] ON [dbo].[Table1].[Table2Sid] = [dbo].[Table2].[Sid] INNER JOIN [dbo].[Table3] ON [dbo].[Table2].[Table3Sid] = [dbo].[Table3].[Sid] WHERE [dbo].[Table1].[Sid] = @Sid AND [dbo].[Table3].[Sid] = @Sid Note that in the last two lines its using @Sid for both Table1 and Table3. How go I do it so it uses @Sid0 and @Sid1? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Non-auto-increment rails/postgresql column

    - by Redian
    I'm trying to have a model/table with duplicate information in it. The reason for this is so that the same data can be written to the table under different users and found for each user. However, I want a quick easy way to identify which information is a duplicate of other information. I think the best way to do this would be to have an item_id of sorts that increments with each "set" of entries to the table. Is there a way to do this without including another table that stores the information without attributing it to users?

    Read the article

  • making an SQL date column visible to a Drupal view

    - by Donal
    I'm trying to make a table visible to Views. One of the columns has type date (as opposed to a Unix timestamp). The example I initially tried to copy from is in modules/comment.views.inc in the Views module: // timestamp (when comment was posted) $data['comments']['timestamp'] = array( 'title' => t('Post date'), 'help' => t('Date and time of when the comment was posted.'), 'field' => array( 'handler' => 'views_handler_field_date', 'click sortable' => TRUE, ), 'sort' => array( 'handler' => 'views_handler_sort_date', ), 'filter' => array( 'handler' => 'views_handler_filter_date', ), ); This makes the dates, which are all in the past year or so, show up as "1 Jan 1970 00:33", so evidently a value of '2010-05-12', for example, is being interpreted as 2010 seconds past 1 Jan 1970 00:00. Can anyone point me to a correct way of exporting date columns? EDIT: I'm following up on some clues found at http://drupal.org/node/476774 .

    Read the article

  • MS Excel 03 - Deleting rows that have live string identifiers in column A, while concatenating other

    - by Justin
    I have this xml document that is provided as a data feed (right off the bat I can not modify the source of the data feed) and i import it into excel with the xml import. there is no schema that comes with this xml so i get a table that ends up having a whole bunch of duplicates for an identifier, because of the unique values spread throughout the spreadsheet. XML in XLS Col1(IDnum) Col2(name) Col3(Type) Col4(Category) Col(etc) ================================================================= 0011 Item 01 6B 0011 Item xxj9 7B 0011 Item xxj9 0011 Item 02 0011 Item 01 xxj9 6B 0012 etc I need to delete all rows where columnA string/number matches while concatenating all potential values from Col3, Col4 & Col5 together so it looks like this Col1(IDnum) Col2(name) Col3(Type) Col4(Category) Col(etc) ================================================================= 0011 Item 01, 02 xxj9 6B, 7B what visual basic method would allow me to accomplish this? thanks

    Read the article

  • Postgresql Output column from another table

    - by muffin
    i'm using Postgresql, my question is specifically about querying from a table that's in another table and i'm really having trouble with this one. In fact, i'm absolutely mentally blocked. I'll try to define the relations of the tables as much as I can. I have a table entry which is like this: Each of the entries has a group_id; when they are 'advanced' to the next stage, the old entries are marked is_active = false, and a new assignment is done, so C & D are advanced stages of A & B. I have another table (which acts as a record keeper) , in which the storage_log_id refers to, this is the storage_log table : But then I have another table, to really find out where the entries are actually stored - storage table : To define my problem properly. Each entry has a storage_log_id (but some doesn't have yet), and a storage_log has a storage_id to refer to the actual table and find the storage label. The sql query i'm trying to do should output this one: Where The actual storage label is shown instead of the log id. This is so far what i've done: select e.id, e.group_id, e.name, e.stage, s.label from operational.entry e, operational.storage_log sl, operational.storage s where e.storage_log_id = sl.id and sl.storage_id = s.id But this just returns 3 rows, showing only the ones that have the seed_storage_log_id set; I should be able to see even those without logs, and especially the active ones. adding e.is_active = true to the condition makes the results empty. So, yeah i'm stuck. Need help, Thanks guys!

    Read the article

  • SQL code to display counts() of value retrieved from another column

    - by Doctor Trout
    I have three tables (these are the relevant columns): Table1 bookingid, person, role Table2 bookingid, projectid Table3 projectid, project, numberofrole1, numberofrole2 Table1.role can take two values: "role1" or "role2". What I want to do is to show which projects don't have the correct number of roles in Table1. The number of roles there there should be for each role is in Table3. For example, if Table1 contains these three rows: bookingid, person, role 7, Tim, role1 7, Bob, role1, 7, Charles, role2 and Table2 bookingid, projectid 7, 1 and Table3 projectid, project, numberofrole1, numberofrole2 1, Test1, 2, 2 I would like the results to show that there are not the correct number of role2s for project Test1. To be honest, something like this is a bit beyond my ability, so I'm open to suggestions on the best way to do this. I'm using sqlite and php (it's only a small project). I suppose I could do something with the php at the end once I've got my results, but I wondered if there was a better way to do it with sqlite. I started by doing something like this: SELECT project, COUNT(numberofrole1) as "Role" FROM Table1 JOIN Table2 USING (projectid) JOIN Table3 USING (bookingid) WHERE role="role1" GROUP BY project But I can't work out how to compare the value returned as "Role" with the value got from numberofrole1 Any help is gratefully received.

    Read the article

  • mysql to xls sheet genration problemI(getting html code along with records ,unable get column names)

    - by pmms
    <?php if($_POST['Submit']=='Generatexml') { $tblname=$_GET['genratexml']; //mysql_connect("localhost","root",""); //mysql_select_db("hitnrunf_db"); global $obj_mysql; $result = mysql_query("SELECT * FROM tbl_js_login"); while($row = mysql_fetch_array($result)) { $csv_output .= "$row[fld_id],$row[fld_fname],$row[fld_lname]"; $csv_output .="\015\012"; } header("Content-type: application/vnd.ms-excel"); header("Content-disposition: csv; filename= Student_Data_". date("Y-m-d") . ".csv"); print $csv_output; exit; } include_once $path."includes/jobseeker_form.php"; ?> In the above we are getting html code along wtih id, firstname, lastname columns. we are unable to get the heading of the columns also How to remove Html code from xls file also need to get headers

    Read the article

  • MS-Access: SQL for updating a column in a table

    - by tecnodude
    Hi, I have the following table in an access database id VisitNo Weight 1 1 100 1 2 95 1 3 96 1 4 94 1 5 93 Now row 2 and 4 are deleted. So i have... id VisitNo Weight 1 1 100 1 3 96 1 5 93 However what i need is... id VisitNo Weight 1 1 100 1 2 96 1 3 93 What is the SQL query i need to accomplish the above? thanks

    Read the article

  • computed column with aggregate function

    - by Kindson
    I have seven columns in my table: hours, weight, status, total_hours, total_weight and percentage total_weight = weight where status = 'X' total_hours = hours where status = 'X' percentage = total_hours/sum(weight) sum(weight) is an aggregate function I would like to specify formula to generate the three computed columns. What do i do?

    Read the article

  • Dynamic Column lookup with different pages in excel

    - by CinCity
    I have a multi page spread sheet in excel that needs to read information dynamically from columns on other pages and have these values show up on a main page. This is the formula I'm using: =IF(VLOOKUP($B:$B,'CP01'!$B:$BN,3,FALSE)="r","r", IF(VLOOKUP($B:$B,'CP01'!$B:$BN,3,FALSE)="a","a","")) CP01 is a sheet in the excel file and instead of look at the specific sheet I want it to look at all of the sheets in the file. Is there a way to do this as an excel formula or with excel-VBA? Edit: I also tried CP* (* being a wildcard character) and it didn't work. Edit2: Is there a way to match the value where the 'CP' is placed with its a other columns value?

    Read the article

  • right click values for Gridview column

    - by peter
    I have grid named 'GridView1' and displaying columns like this <asp:GridView ID="GridView1" OnRowCommand="ScheduleGridView_RowCommand" runat="server" AutoGenerateColumns="False" Height="60px" Style="text-align: center" Width="869px" EnableViewState="False"> <Columns> <asp:BoundField HeaderText="Topic" DataField="Topic" /> <asp:BoundField DataField="Moderator" HeaderText="Moderator" /> <asp:BoundField DataField="Expert" HeaderText="Expert" /> <asp:BoundField DataField="StartTime" HeaderText="Start" > <HeaderStyle Width="175px" /> </asp:BoundField> <asp:BoundField DataField="EndTime" HeaderText="End" > <HeaderStyle Width="175px" /> </asp:BoundField> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="Join" ShowHeader="False"> <ItemTemplate> <asp:Button ID="JoinBT" runat="server" CommandArgument="<%# Container.DataItemIndex %>" CommandName="Join" Text="Join" Width="52px" /> </ItemTemplate> <HeaderStyle Height="15px" /> </asp:TemplateField> </Columns> </asp:GridView> Here what is my requirement is whenever we right click on each row in gridview ,it should display three option join meeting(if we click it will go to meeting.aspx),,view details(will go to detail.aspx),,Subscribe(subscribe.aspx) just like when we click right any where we can see view,sortby,refresh like that..Do we need to implement javascript here

    Read the article

  • group by with value of another column

    - by phenevo
    Hi, I've got table Articles ID identity autoincement, IDArticle: nvarchar(100) ,IDCar nvarchar(100), createddate How to convert this: SELECT IDCar , MAX(createddate) FROM Articles GROUP BY IDCar to get IDArticle eg: 1 art1 BWM 5-21-2010 2 art2 BMW 5-24-2010 3 art3 BMW 5-31-2010 4 art4 Porshe 5-31-2010 5 art5 Porshe 6-1-2010 Expecting result is: art3 art5 It's not duplicated with: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2736769/sql-query-number-of-occurance/2736809#2736809

    Read the article

  • LINQ2SQL: How to let a column accept null values as zero (0) in Self-Relation table

    - by Remon
    As described in the img, I got a parent-Children relation and since the ParentID not accepting null values (and I can't change to nullabel due to some restriction in the UI I have), how can I remove an existence relation between ReportDataSources in order to change the parent for them (here i want to set the parentId for one of them = 0) how could i do that since i cant change the ParentID directly and setting Parent = null is not valid public void SetReportDataSourceAsMaster(ReportDataSource reportDataSource) { //Some logic - not necessarily for this scenario //Reset Master this.ReportDataSources.ToList().ForEach(rds => rds.IsMaster = false); //Set Master reportDataSource.IsMaster = true; //Set Parent ID for the rest of the Reports data sources this.ReportDataSources.Where(rds => rds.ID != reportDataSource.ID).ToList().ForEach(rds => { //Change Parent ID rds.Parent = reportDataSource; //Remove filttering data rds.FilteringDataMembers.Clear(); //Remove Grouping Data rds.GroupingDataMembers.Clear(); }); //Delete parent HERE THE EXCEPTION THROWN AFTER CALLING SUBMITCHANGES() reportDataSource.Parent = null; //Other logic } Exception thrown after calling submitChanges An attempt was made to remove a relationship between a ReportDataSource and a ReportDataSource. However, one of the relationship's foreign keys (ReportDataSource.ParentID) cannot be set to null.

    Read the article

  • InfoPath: How to display a third column of a datasource?

    - by Michael Bray
    I have an InfoPath 2007 browser-enabled form that has a datasource with three columns, let's say columns A, B, and C. I have a dropdown that is keyed to column A and displays column B. Column C contains some data that I want to display in an expression box, and that I also want to use in some data validation against another field on the form. I'm looking for some help on how to reference that column C for displaying and use in validation. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Multi "column" DataGridView C#

    - by Wesley
    I have a DataGridView that's bound to a DataSet. It has columns DateCreated, Weight, DateUsed. Those three columns do not take up much horizontal space on DataGridView that is nearly full screen. Is it possible to have those columns wrap back to the top if the view is wide enough to support a second group of those colums. So across the header it would read DateCreated, Weight, DateUsed, DateCreated, Weight, DateUsed. Then when a row is clicked, only 3 cells would be highlighted, not all six. Is there something that can provide this functionality?

    Read the article

  • PHP and MySQL - Printing rows matching a column value

    - by Michael
    Hello, I need to write a PHP script that will print out results from a MySQL database. For example, say I have 9 fields. Field 1 is an auto increasing number, field two is a three digit number. I need to be able to have a script read, find the matching number (it'll be from a POST), and then display all matching three digit results, and the 7 other fields as well. I am already logged in to the database in this script. I guess I'm really at a loss of where to begin. How would one start something like this? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Mysql Left join with condition on column

    - by skicster
    Hi, can you help me with sql query? I have this problem: I have two tables "Join" table: Reservation_has_meal +----------------+ | id_reservation | | id_meal | | pieces | +----------------+ and table with data: Meal +-------------+ | id_meal | | name | +-------------+ Sample data for Meal: 1 | carrot 2 | potatoe 3 | cucumber Reservation_has_meal 1 | 2 | 5230 1 | 3 | 1203 How can I get this result for reservation with id_reservation=1: id_meal | id_Reservation | name | pcs | -------------------------------------------- 1 | 1 | carrot | null| 2 | 1 | potatoe | 5230| 3 | 1 | cucumber | 1203| -------------------------------------------- And result for id_reservation = 2: id_meal | id_Reservation | name | pcs | -------------------------------------------- 1 | 2 | carrot | null| 2 | 2 | potatoe | null| 3 | 2 | cucumber | null| -------------------------------------------- Thanks for advice.

    Read the article

  • Multiple column foreign key contraints

    - by eugene4968
    I want to setup table constraints for the following scenario and I’m not sure how to do it or if it’s even possible in SQL Server 2005. I have three tables A,B,C. C is a child of B. B will have a optional foreign key(may be null) referencing A. For performance reasons I also want table C to have the same foreign key reference to table A. The constraint on table C should be that C must reference its parent (B) and also have the same foreign key reference to A as its parent. Anyone have any thoughts on how to do this?

    Read the article

  • row convert to column in sql 2008

    - by jay
    create table #cusphone(cusid int,cusph1 int) insert into #cusphone values(1,48509) insert into #cusphone values(1,48508) insert into #cusphone values(1,48507) insert into #cusphone values(2,48100) out put 1 48509 48508 48507 2 48100 null null

    Read the article

  • Updating an integer defined column in a MySQL DB with PHP

    - by Zloy Smiertniy
    I have a table defined like this: create table users ( id int(10), age int(3), name varchar (50) ) I want to use a query to update just age, which is an integer, that comes from an html form. When it arrives to the method that updates it, it comes as a string, so I change it to integer with PHP and try to update the table, but it doesn't work $age = intval($age); $q2 = "UPDATE users SET age='$age' where username like '$username';"; mysql_query($q2,$con);

    Read the article

  • how to copy from one column to another but with different format

    - by Bob
    I hv a table like this:- Item Model Remarks ----------------------------------------- A 10022009 B 10032006 C 05081997 I need to copy the info from "Model" to "Remarks" with the following format:- Item Model Remarks ----------------------------------------- A 10022009 20090210 B 10032006 20060310 C 05081997 19970805 Thanks

    Read the article

  • MySQL table with similar column info - HELP!!!

    - by George Garman
    I have a DB with a table that is named "victim". The form that dumps the info into the table has room for two victims and therefore there is vic1_fname, vic1_lname, vic2_fname, vic2_lname, etc.. (business name, person first, person last, address, city, state, zip) a "1" and "2" of each. Now I want to search the DB and locate listed victims. This is what I have so far: $result = mysql_query( "SELECT victim.* FROM victim WHERE vic1_business_name OR vic2_business_name LIKE '%$search_vic_business_name%' AND vic1_fname OR vic2_fname LIKE '%$search_vic_fname%' AND vic1_lname OR vic2_lname LIKE '%$search_vic_lname%' AND vic1_address OR vic2_address LIKE '%$search_vic_address%' AND vic1_city OR vic2_city LIKE '%$search_vic_city%' AND vic1_state OR vic2_state LIKE '%$search_vic_state%' AND vic1_dob OR vic2_dob LIKE '%$search_vic_dob%' "); <table width="960" style="border: groove;" border=".5"> <tr><th colspan=10>You search results are listed below:</th></tr> <tr> <th>Case Number</th> <th>Business Name</th> <th>First Name</th> <th>Last Name</th> <th>DOB / Age</th> <th>Address</th> <th>City</th> <th>State</th> </tr> <?php while($row = mysql_fetch_array($result)) { ?> <tr> <td align="center"><?php print $row['vic_business_name']; ?></td> <td align="center"><?php print $row['vic_fname']; ?></td> <td align="center"><?php print $row['vic_lname']; ?></td> <td align="center"><?php print $row['vic_dob']; ?></td> <td align="center"><?php print $row['vic_adress']; ?></td> <td align="center"><?php print $row['vic_city']; ?></td> <td align="center"><?php print $row['vic_state']; ?></td> </tr> <?php } ?> </table> The info did not display in the table until I changed the table to this: <tr> <td align="center"><?php print $row['vic1_business_name']; ?></td> <td align="center"><?php print $row['vic1_fname']; ?></td> <td align="center"><?php print $row['vic1_lname']; ?></td> <td align="center"><?php print $row['vic1_dob']; ?></td> <td align="center"><?php print $row['vic1_adress']; ?></td> <td align="center"><?php print $row['vic1_city']; ?></td> <td align="center"><?php print $row['vic1_state']; ?></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center"><?php print $row['vic2_business_name']; ?></td> <td align="center"><?php print $row['vic2_fname']; ?></td> <td align="center"><?php print $row['vic2_lname']; ?></td> <td align="center"><?php print $row['vic2_dob']; ?></td> <td align="center"><?php print $row['vic2_adress']; ?></td> <td align="center"><?php print $row['vic2_city']; ?></td> <td align="center"><?php print $row['vic2_state']; ?></td> </tr> Now it displays both rows, even if its empty. It doesn't matter if the victim was listed originally as vic1 or vic2, i just want to know if they are a victim. I hope this makes sense. I can't get it to display the way I want, line-by-line, irregardless of whether you are vic1 or vic2.

    Read the article

  • excluding a column in csv file with regex

    - by JPro
    Is there any way to exclude/delete/replace one field from a csv file with some regexp in notepad++? I have a csv file with some data like this: '1','data1','data2','data3','data4','data5','data6','data7','data8','data9', 'data10','data11','data12','data13','data14','data15','data16','data17','data18', 'data19','data20','data21','data22','data23','\'data24 with some commas, here and there and some "double quotes", and fullstops.','data25','data26' The only problem I am facing is with data24 WHERE I encounter \' and then "" and some wild characters like , and .. This is particularly fixed at 24 field. For the purpose of clarity, I have entered a newline here. But the entire text above is in juts one line. Any ideas on how to solve? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • 3 column html template - content overflows though there is clear both and height is 100%

    - by MeltingDog
    I have 3 divs within a wrapper: <div id="wrapper"> <div id="leftbar"> Lorem ipsum dolar sit amet </div><!--LEFTBAR--> <div id="middle"> Lorem ipsum dolar sit amet </div><!--middle--> <div id="rightbar"> Lorem ipsum dolar sit amet </div><!--RIGHTBAR--> </div><!--wrapper--> Both 'leftbar' and 'middle' are floating left, whilst 'rightbar' is floating right. 'wrapper' has height:100%; clear:both; set. However, if there is a large amount of text or content in 'middle' it overflows the 'wrapper' div. I am struggling to figure out why this is occurring. My CSS is: #wrapper { width: 1000px; height: 100%; margin:auto; padding: 30px; margin-top: 40px; background-color:#FFF; color:#000; border: 2px solid #828fc4; clear:both; } #leftbar { float:left; width: 150px; min-height: 450px; padding: 5px; } #middle { float:left; height: 100%; width: 580px; padding-left: 20px; padding-right: 20px; border-right: 1px dotted #2B308C; border-left: 1px dotted #2B308C; } #rightbar { float:right; width: 200px; min-height: 450px; padding: 5px; } Any advice is appreciated! EDIT: here is the issue on a test server: http://host.pixelframe.net.au/~pptestco/index.php?id=20

    Read the article

  • MySQL Join/Comparison on a DATETIME column (<5.6.4 and > 5.6.4)

    - by Simon
    Suppose i have two tables like so: Events ID (PK int autoInc), Time (datetime), Caption (varchar) Position ID (PK int autoinc), Time (datetime), Easting (float), Northing (float) Is it safe to, for example, list all the events and their position if I am using the Time field as my joining criteria? I.e.: SELECT E.*,P.* FROM Events E JOIN Position P ON E.Time = P.Time OR, even just simply comparing a datetime value (taking into consideration that the parameterized value may contain the fractional seconds part - which MySQL has always accepted) e.g. SELECT E.* FROM Events E WHERE E.Time = @Time I understand MySQL (before version 5.6.4) only stores datetime fields WITHOUT milliseconds. So I would assume this query would function OK. However as of version 5.6.4, I have read MySQL can now store milliseconds with the datetime field. Assuming datetime values are inserted using functions such as NOW(), the milliseconds are truncated (<5.6.4) which I would assume allow the above query to work. However, with version 5.6.4 and later, this could potentially NOT work. I am, and only ever will be interested in second accuracy. If anyone could answer the following questions would be greatly appreciated: In General, how does MySQL compare datetime fields against one another (consider the above query). Is the above query fine, and does it make use of indexes on the time fields? (MySQL < 5.6.4) Is there any way to exclude milliseconds? I.e. when inserting and in conditional joins/selects etc? (MySQL 5.6.4) Will the join query above work? (MySQL 5.6.4) EDIT I know i can cast the datetimes, thanks for those that answered, but i'm trying to tackle the root of the problem here (the fact that the storage type/definition has been changed) and i DO NOT want to use functions in my queries. This negates all my work of optimizing queries applying indexes etc, not to mention having to rewrite all my queries. EDIT2 Can anyone out there suggest a reason NOT to join on a DATETIME field using second accuracy?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67  | Next Page >