Search Results

Search found 27905 results on 1117 pages for 'sql authority'.

Page 603/1117 | < Previous Page | 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610  | Next Page >

• MySQL Column Value Pivot

  - by manyxcxi

  I have a MySQL InnoDB table laid out like so: id (int), run_id (int), element_name (varchar), value (text), line_order, column_order `MyDB`.`MyTable` ( `id` bigint(20) NOT NULL, `run_id` int(11) NOT NULL, `element_name` varchar(255) NOT NULL, `value` text, `line_order` int(11) default NULL, `column_order` int(11) default NULL It is used to store data generated by a Java program that used to output this in CSV format, hence the line_order and column_order. Lets say I have 2 entries (according to the table description): 1,1,'ELEMENT 1','A',0,0 2,1,'ELEMENT 2','B',0,1 I want to pivot this data in a view for reporting so that it would look like more like the CSV would, where the output would look this: --------------------- |ELEMENT 1|ELEMENT 2| --------------------- | A | B | --------------------- The data coming in is extremely dynamic; it can be in any order, can be any of over 900 different elements, and the value could be anything. The Run ID ties them all together, and the line and column order basically let me know where the user wants that data to come back in order.

  Read the article

• outer join for parent child chain

  - by dotnetcoder

  Considering below tables and relationships: parent --1:Many-- children --1:Many-- shubchildren Parent may or many not have children records. children always have subchildren records. I wan to write a qiery to select parent names where any if matched parent.name,children.name or subchildren.name Here i understand I have to do a left outer join between parent and children. But what kind of join should I put between children and subchildren ?

  Read the article

• Embedding generic sql queries into c# program

  - by Pooja Balkundi

  Okay referring to my first question code in the main, I want the user to enter employee name at runtime and then i take this name which user has entered and compare it with the e_name of my emp table , if it exists i want to display all information of that employee , how can I achieve this ? using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Windows.Forms; using MySql.Data.MySqlClient; namespace ConnectCsharppToMySQL { public class DBConnect { private MySqlConnection connection; private string server; private string database; private string uid; private string password; string name; //Constructor public DBConnect() { Initialize(); } //Initialize values private void Initialize() { server = "localhost"; database = "test"; uid = "root"; password = ""; string connectionString; connectionString = "SERVER=" + server + ";" + "DATABASE=" + database + ";" + "UID=" + uid + ";" + "PASSWORD=" + password + ";"; connection = new MySqlConnection(connectionString); } //open connection to database private bool OpenConnection() { try { connection.Open(); return true; } catch (MySqlException ex) { //When handling errors, you can your application's response based //on the error number. //The two most common error numbers when connecting are as follows: //0: Cannot connect to server. //1045: Invalid user name and/or password. switch (ex.Number) { case 0: MessageBox.Show("Cannot connect to server. Contact administrator"); break; case 1045: MessageBox.Show("Invalid username/password, please try again"); break; } return false; } } //Close connection private bool CloseConnection() { try { connection.Close(); return true; } catch (MySqlException ex) { MessageBox.Show(ex.Message); return false; } } //Insert statement public void Insert() { string query = "INSERT INTO emp (e_name, age) VALUES('Pooja R', '21')"; //open connection if (this.OpenConnection() == true) { //create command and assign the query and connection from the constructor MySqlCommand cmd = new MySqlCommand(query, connection); //Execute command cmd.ExecuteNonQuery(); //close connection this.CloseConnection(); } } //Update statement public void Update() { string query = "UPDATE emp SET e_name='Peachy', age='22' WHERE e_name='Pooja R'"; //Open connection if (this.OpenConnection() == true) { //create mysql command MySqlCommand cmd = new MySqlCommand(); //Assign the query using CommandText cmd.CommandText = query; //Assign the connection using Connection cmd.Connection = connection; //Execute query cmd.ExecuteNonQuery(); //close connection this.CloseConnection(); } } //Select statement public List<string>[] Select() { string query = "SELECT * FROM emp where e_name=(/*I WANT USER ENTERED NAME TO GET INSERTED HERE*/)"; //Create a list to store the result List<string>[] list = new List<string>[3]; list[0] = new List<string>(); list[1] = new List<string>(); list[2] = new List<string>(); //Open connection if (this.OpenConnection() == true) { //Create Command MySqlCommand cmd = new MySqlCommand(query, connection); //Create a data reader and Execute the command MySqlDataReader dataReader = cmd.ExecuteReader(); //Read the data and store them in the list while (dataReader.Read()) { list[0].Add(dataReader["e_id"] + ""); list[1].Add(dataReader["e_name"] + ""); list[2].Add(dataReader["age"] + ""); } //close Data Reader dataReader.Close(); //close Connection this.CloseConnection(); //return list to be displayed return list; } else { return list; } } public static void Main(String[] args) { DBConnect db1 = new DBConnect(); Console.WriteLine("Initializing"); db1.Initialize(); Console.WriteLine("Search :"); Console.WriteLine("Enter the employee name"); db1.name = Console.ReadLine(); db1.Select(); Console.ReadLine(); } } }

  Read the article

• Aggregate Functions on subsets of data based on current row values with SQL

  - by aasukisuki

  Hopefully that title makes sense... Let's say I have an employee table: ID | Name | Title | Salary ---------------------------- 1 | Bob | Manager | 15285 2 | Joe | Worker | 10250 3 | Al | Worker | 11050 4 | Paul | Manager | 16025 5 | John | Worker | 10450 What I'd like to do is write a query that will give me the above table, along with an averaged salary column, based on the employee title: ID | Name | Title | Salary | Pos Avg -------------------------------------- 1 | Bob | Manager | 15285 | 15655 2 | Joe | Worker | 10250 | 10583 3 | Al | Worker | 11050 | 10583 4 | Paul | Manager | 16025 | 15655 5 | John | Worker | 10450 | 10583 I've tried doing this with a sub-query along the lines of: Select *, (select Avg(e2.salary) from employee e2 where e2.title = e.title) from employee e But I've come to realize that the sub-query is executed first, and has no knowledge of the table alias'd e I'm sure I'm missing something REALLY obvious here, can anyone point me in the right diretion?

  Read the article

• Linked Measure Groups and Local Dimensions

  - by ekoner

  Mulling over something I've been reading up on. According to Chris Webb, A linked measure group can only be used with dimensions from the same database as the source measure group. So I took this to mean as long as two cubes share a database, a linked measure group can be used with a dimension. So I created a new cube and added a local measure group, a local dimension and a linked measure group. However, I can't create a relationship between the linked measure group and the local dimension even though they are within the same database. I get the message below: Regular relationships in the current database between non-linked (local) dimensions and linked measure groups cannot be edited. These relationship can only be created through the wizard. This dialog can be used to delete these relationships. I see that I can go to the original cube and add the dimension there, but does the message below mean I have an alternative? I just know it's going to be something simple and trivial! Thanks for reading.

  Read the article

• MySQL - display rows of names and addresses grouped by name, where name occures more than once

  - by Stoob

  I have two tables, "name" and "address". I would like to list the last_name and joined address.street_address of all last_name in table "name" that occur more than once in table "name". The two tables are joined on the column "name_id". The desired output would appear like so: 213 | smith | 123 bluebird | 14 | smith | 456 first ave | 718 | smith | 12 san antonia st. | 244 | jones | 78 third ave # 45 | 98 | jones | 18177 toronto place | Note that if the last_name "abernathy" appears only once in table "name", then "abernathy" should not be included in the result. This is what I came up with so far: SELECT name.name_id, name.last_name, address.street_address, count(*) FROM `name` JOIN `address` ON name.name_id = address.name_id GROUP BY `last_name` HAVING count(*) > 1 However, this produces only one row per last name. I'd like all the last names listed. I know I am missing something simple. Any help is appreciated, thanks!

  Read the article

• question about frequency of updating access

  - by I__

  i have a table in an access database this access database is used on a regular basis, basically from 9-5 someone else has a copy of this exact table. sometimes records are added, sometimes deleted, and sometimes data within the records is updated. i need to update the access database table with the offsite table every hour or so. what is the best algorithm of updating the data? there are about 5000 records. would it severely lock up the table for a few seconds every hour? i would like to publicly apologize for my rude comment to david fenton

  Read the article

• Two different tables or just one with bool column?

  - by Aidas

  We have two tables: OriginalDocument and ProcessedDocument. In the first one we put an original, not processed document. After it's validated and processed (converted to our xml format and parsed), it's put into Document table. Processed document can be valid or invalid. Which makes more sense: have two different tables for valid and invalid documents or just have one with 'Valid' column? Some of the columns (~5-7) are irrelevant for invalid document. Storing both invalid and valid documents would also make Document table filled with 'NULL' columns (if document is invalid, information like document number, receiver can be unknown). What else should we consider and weigh, when making this decision?

  Read the article

• Help on understanding multiple columns on an index?

  - by Xaisoft

  Assume I have a table called "table" and I have 3 columns, a, b, and c. What does it mean to have a non-clustered index on columns a,b? Is a nonclustered index on columns a,b the same as a nonclustered index on columns b,a? (Note the order). Also, Is a nonclustered index on column a the same as a nonclustered index on a,c? I was looking at the website sqlserver performance and they had these dmv scripts where it would tell you if you had overlapping indexes and I believe it was saying that having an index on a is the same as a,b, so it is redundant. Is this true about indexes? One last question is why is the clustered index put on the primary key. Most of the time the primary key is not queried against, so shouldn't the clustered index be on the most queried column. I am probably missing something here like having it on the primary key speeds up joins? Great explanations. Should I turn this into a wiki and change the title index explanation?

  Read the article

• Mssql dilemma, performance

  - by Woland

  Hello I am creating app where user can save options witch one is better? 1) to save into user table varchar feeld smthing like ('1,23,4354,34,3') query for this is select * from data where CHARINDEX ( 'L', Providers , 0 ) 0 2) create other table where user options are and just add rows select * from data where Providers in (select Providers from userdata where userid=100) thanks for help

  Read the article

• Database Modeling - Either/Or in Many-to-Many

  - by EkoostikMartin

  I have an either/or type of situation in a many-to-many relationship I'm trying to model. So I have these tables: Message ---- *MessageID MessageText Employee ---- *EmployeeID EmployeeName Team ---- *TeamID TeamName MessageTarget ---- MessageID EmployeeID (nullable) TeamID (nullable) So, a Message can have either a list of Employees, or a list of Teams as a MessageTarget. Is the MessageTarget table I have above the best way to implement this relationship? What constraints can I place on the MessageTarget effectively? How should I create a primary key on MessageTarget table?

  Read the article

• access: print report question

  - by I__

  here's the design view of my report: how do i force it to print only one set of these per page, because currently it is printing like this: i want it it print only one set of these controls per page

  Read the article

• Need some serious help with self join issue.

  - by kralco626

  Well as you may know, you cannot index a view with a self join. Well actually even two joins of the same table, even if it's not technically a self join. A couple of guys from microsoft came up with a work around. But it's so complicated I don't understand it!!! The solution to the problem is here: http://jmkehayias.blogspot.com/2008/12/creating-indexed-view-with-self-join.html The view I want to apply this work around to is: create VIEW vw_lookup_test WITH SCHEMABINDING AS select count_big(*) as [count_all], awc_txt, city_nm, str_nm, stru_no, o.circt_cstdn_nm [owner], t.circt_cstdn_nm [tech], dvc.circt_nm, data_orgtn_yr from ((dbo.dvc join dbo.circt on dvc.circt_nm = circt.circt_nm) join dbo.circt_cstdn o on circt.circt_cstdn_user_id = o.circt_cstdn_user_id) join dbo.circt_cstdn t on dvc.circt_cstdn_user_id = t.circt_cstdn_user_id group by awc_txt, city_nm, str_nm, stru_no, o.circt_cstdn_nm, t.circt_cstdn_nm, dvc.circt_nm, data_orgtn_yr go Any help would be greatly apreciated!!! Thanks so much in advance!

  Read the article

• How to report DataContext.SubmitChanges() progress with LINQ2SQL

  - by kzen

  If there is a foreach loop that contains DataContext.Customer.InsertOnSubmit(cust) for example: foreach (Object obj in collection) { Customer cust = new Customer { Id = obj.Id, Name = obj.Name ... }; DataContext.Customer.InsertOnSubmit(cust); } And outside of the loop there is a call to: DataContext.SubmittChanges(); Is there a way to obtain the SubmittChanges progress in order to report the progress back to the user (or a different approach without moving the SubmittChanges into the loop)?

  Read the article

• Jasper error: Caused by SQLServerException: Transaction (Process ID 58) was deadlocked on thread | c

  - by Saky

  I got the above error in my jasper report mail. The query that is used in the report is quite complicated (for me). Reading different posts I conclude that to solve this the I have to change the query to SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL REPEATABLE READ GO BEGIN TRANSACTION ... my query ... COMMIT TRANSACTION ? I wonder if this is the correct way to solve the error and that if it has any side effects? Has it happened to anyone in the Jasper reports? Does anyone know if there is a better solution exist to the problem? (Although that I have not yet tested the above solution, if anyone can give any insight on this will be helpful.)

  Read the article

• Error in Postgres execute

  - by RAJA

  I'm using this function... -- Function: dbo.sp_acc_createaccount(character varying, integer, integer, character varying, character varying, character varying, character varying) -- DROP FUNCTION dbo.sp_acc_createaccount(character varying, integer, integer, character varying, character varying, character varying, character varying); CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION dbo.sp_acc_createaccount(IN in_orgmgrtype character varying, INOUT in_parentid integer, IN in_levelid integer, IN in_name character varying, IN in_phone character varying, IN in_webpage character varying, IN in_owner character varying, OUT out_accountid integer) RETURNS record AS $BODY$ DECLARE l_CoID int; l_CurrID int; l_OrgMgrId int; errmsg varchar(250); BEGIN IF in_ParentID = -1 THEN errmsg := 'execute sp_Acc_GetCompanyIDForUser failed'; l_CoID := dbo.sp_Acc_GetCompanyIDForUser(in_user); IF l_CoID = -2 THEN RAISE EXCEPTION 'execute sp_Acc_GetCompanyIDForUser failed'; END IF; errmsg := 'execute sp_Acc_GetOrgMgrIDForCompany failed'; l_OrgMgrID := dbo.sp_Acc_GetOrgMgrIDForCompany(in_OrgMgrType, l_CoID); IF l_OrgMgrID = -2 THEN RAISE EXCEPTION 'execute sp_Acc_GetOrgMgrIDForCompany failed'; END IF; in_ParentID := l_OrgMgrID; ELSE errmsg := 'Select orgmgrid failed'; SELECT OrgMgrID INTO l_CurrID FROM dbo.OrgMgr WHERE Name = in_Name AND ParentID = in_ParentID; END IF; -- if not, add it IF l_CurrID IS NULL THEN errmsg := 'Insert into orgmgr(account creation) failed'; INSERT INTO dbo.OrgMgr (ParentID, LevelID, Name, PrimaryPhone, WebPage, Owner) VALUES (in_ParentID, in_LevelID, in_Name, in_Phone, in_WebPage, in_Owner); out_AccountID := currval('dbo.OrgMgr_accountid_seq'); ELSE out_AccountID := -1; END IF; COMMIT; EXCEPTION WHEN RAISE_EXCEPTION THEN out_AccountID := 99; RAISE NOTICE 'ERROR : %',errmsg; WHEN OTHERS THEN out_AccountID := 99; RAISE EXCEPTION 'ERROR : %',errmsg; END $BODY$ LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' VOLATILE COST 100; ALTER FUNCTION dbo.sp_acc_createaccount(character varying, integer, integer, character varying, character varying, character varying, character varying) OWNER TO postgres; But.. it's showing error in execute time .. ERROR: SPI_execute_plan failed executing query "ROLLBACK": SPI_ERROR_TRANSACTION

  Read the article

• Is there a way to optimize this update query?

  - by SchlaWiener

  I have a master table called "parent" and a related table called "childs" Now I run a query against the master table to update some values with the sum from the child table like this. UPDATE master m SET quantity1 = (SELECT SUM(quantity1) FROM childs c WHERE c.master_id = m.id), quantity2 = (SELECT SUM(quantity2) FROM childs c WHERE c.master_id = m.id), count = (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM childs c WHERE c.master_id = m.id) WHERE master_id = 666; Which works as expected but is not a good style because I basically make multiple SELECT querys on the same result. Is there a way to optimize that? (Making a query first and storing the values is not an option. I tried this: UPDATE master m SET (quantity1, quantity2, count) = ( SELECT SUM(quantity1), SUM(quantity2), COUNT(*) FROM childs c WHERE c.master_id = m.id ) WHERE master_id = 666; but that doesn't work.

  Read the article

• Combining the UNIQUE and CHECK constraints

  - by Bobby

  I have a table with columns a b and c, and if c is false then I only want to allow insertions if columns a and b are unique, but if c is true then a and b do not need to be unique. Example: There can only be one (foo, bar, false) in the table, but no limit on how many (foo, bar, true) there can be. I tried something like CONSTRAINT blah UNIQUE (a,b) AND CHECK (C is TRUE) but I can't figure out the correct syntax.

  Read the article

• counting rows that date hasn't yet passed

  - by AdRock

  I am trying to count the number of rows whose date has not yet passed so i can get only the current records I get an error sayng MySQL error #111 Invalid use of group function SELECT COUNT(festivalid) FROM festivals WHERE min(datefrom) > now()

  Read the article

• How do you compare dates in a LINQ query?

  - by Gina

  I am tring to compare a date from a asp calendar control to a date in the table.... here's what i have... it doesn't like the == ? var query = from details in db.TD_TravelCalendar_Details where details.StartDate == calStartDate.SelectedDate && details.EndDate == calEndDate.SelectedDate select details;

  Read the article

• Problem using Embarcadero ER/Studio with Postgres (With Serial PK)

  - by Paul

  Hello ... I created a table using ER/STudio 8.0.3 ... The table has a serial pk (SERIAL/INTEGER in ER/Studio)... But the ER/Studio Physical Model generated convert the Serial to Integer... And The generated table in database has a integer pk, without auto-increment functionality... Any idea? Table generated : CREATE TABLE test ( id integer NOT NULL ) Should be : CREATE TABLE test ( id serial NOT NULL )

  Read the article

• Replace into equivalent for postgresql and then autoincrementing an int

  - by Mohamed Ikal Al-Jabir

  Okay no seriously, if a postgresql guru can help out I'm just getting started. Basically what I want is a simple table like such: CREATE TABLE schema.searches ( search_id serial NOT NULL, search_query character varying(255), search_count integer DEFAULT 1, CONSTRAINT pkey_search_id PRIMARY KEY (search_id) ) WITH ( OIDS=FALSE ); I need something like REPLACE INTO for mysql. I don't know if I have to write my own procedure or something? Basically: check if the query already exists if so, just add 1 to the count it not, add it to the db I can do this in my php code but I'd rather all that be done in postgres C engine Thanks for helping

  Read the article

• ODBC vs MySQLClient

  - by Matt

  I'm currently using ODBC to connect to my MySQL database, using C#. I've been told that using the MySql Connector would be better, and faster, and not dependent on Windows. Can someone shed some light on this please? I've been unable to find anything on the net so far

  Read the article

• make multiple, composite query in oracle

  - by Meloun

  How can i make multiple, composite query in oracle? for example this several queries in one step? 1 CREATE TABLE test (id NUMBER PRIMARY KEY, name VARCHAR2(30)); 2 CREATE SEQUENCE test_sequence START WITH 1 INCREMENT BY 1; 3 CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER test_trigger BEFORE INSERT ON test REFERENCING NEW AS NEW FOR EACH ROW BEGIN SELECT test_sequence.nextval INTO :NEW.ID FROM dual; END; 4 INSERT INTO test (name) VALUES ('Jon'); 5 INSERT INTO test (name) VALUES ('Meloun');

  Read the article

• Many to Many Association Tables - Is it customary to put additional columns in these tables?

  - by Randy Minder

  We've encountered the following situation in our database. We have table 'A' and table 'B' which have a M2M relationship. The association table is named 'AB' and contains a FK column to table 'A' and a FK column to table 'B'. Now we've identified a need to store additional data about this association. For example, a date when the association occurred, and who made the association etc. We've decided to put these additional columns in the 'AB' association table. However, something tells me this is frowned upon by database purists. On the other hand, it makes no sense to us to create yet an additional table to store this associated data. What's the prevailing thought on this?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610  | Next Page >