Search Results

Search found 5131 results on 206 pages for 'gung foo'.

Page 61/206 | < Previous Page | 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68  | Next Page >

• PHP Simplify a ternary operation

  - by Obay

  In PHP, is there a way to simplify this even more, without using an if()? $foo = $bar!==0 ? $foo : ''; I was wondering if there was a way to not reassign $foo to itself if the condition is satisfied. I understand there is a way to do this in Javascript (using &&, right?), but was wondering if there was a way to do this in PHP.

  Read the article

• How to access a superclass method from a nested class?

  - by m01

  I hope this code explains the problem: class Foo { void a() { / *stuff */ } } class Bar extends Foo { void a() { throw new Exception("This is not allowed for Bar"); } class Baz { void blah() { // how to access Foo.a from here? } } } I know that I may be doing something wrong, because inheritance perhaps shouldn't be used in such way. But it's the easiest way in my situation. And, beside that, I'm just curious. Is it possible?

  Read the article

• jquery, attaching objects (instead of string attribute) to an element

  - by binaryLV

  Hi! I'm trying to build DOM with jQuery and fill it with data that is received with AJAX (data type = json). I'd like to also store this data as an object, attached to a specific DOM element. Does jQuery provide any method for this? The reason I want to do it is because only part of data is initially displayed; other data might be needed later, depending on user actions. I tried using attr(), but it stores a string "[object Object]" instead of an actual object: var div = $('<div/>'); div.attr('foo', {bar: 'foobar'}); alert(div.attr('foo')); // gives "[object Object]" alert(typeof div.attr('foo')); // gives "string" alert(div.attr('foo').bar); // gives "undefined" Another way to do this would be by "bypassing" jQuery (div[0].foo = {bar: 'foobar'};), though this seems to be a "dirty workaround", if jQuery happens to already support attaching objects. Any ideas? Thanks in advance!

  Read the article

• Xcode method navigation

  - by Bill

  In Xcode 4, I can press Ctrl-6 to get a list of all the methods in the current file. The problem is, if I have private methods declared at the top of my implementation file, say: @interface Foo () -(void)tap:(id)sender; @end @implementation Foo ... -(void)tap:(id)sender { ... } then starting to type "tap" while the method list is visible will just take me to the declaration, since it comes first in the file, when what I really want is the implementation. Is there any way to exclude these declarations from the method list or do I need to resort to separate Foo.h and Foo+Private.h headers? Thanks!

  Read the article

• Ruby on Rails: temporarily update an attribute into cache without saving it?

  - by randombits

  I have a bit of code that depicts this hypothetical setup below. A class Foo which contains many Bars. Bar belongs to one and only one Foo. At some point, Foo can do a finite loop that lapses 2+ iterations. In that loop, something like the following happens: bar = Bar.find_where_in_use_is_zero bar.in_use = 1 Basically what find_where_in_use_is_zero does something like this in as far as SQL goes: SELECT * from bars WHERE in_use = 0 Now the problem I'm facing is that I cannot run the following line of code after bar.in_use =1 is invoked: bar.save The reason is clear, I'm still looping and the new Foo hasn't been created, so we don't have a foo_id to put into bars.foo_id. Even if I set to allow foo_id to be NULL, we have a problem where one of the bars can fail validation and the existing one was saved to the database. In my application, that doesn't work. The entire request is atomic, either all succeeds or fails together. What happens next, is that in my loop, I have the potential to select the same exact bar that I did on a previous iteration of the loop since the in_use flag will not be set to 1 until @foo.save is called. Is there anyway to work around this condition and temporarily set the in_use attribute to 1 for subsequent iterations of the loop so that I retrieve an available bar instance?

  Read the article

• python copytree with negated ignore pattern

  - by Chris H

  I'm trying to use python to copy a tree of files/directories. is it possible to use copytree to copy everything that ends in foo? There is an ignore_patterns patterns function, can I give it a negated regular expression? Are they supported in python? eg. copytree(src, dest, False, ignore_pattern('!*.foo')) Where ! means NOT anything that ends in foo. thanks.

  Read the article

• How do I return an object that is able to execute on the server?

  - by mafutrct

  Coming from a Java background, this is the way I'm thinking: The server provides an object to the client. This object should be able to execute on the server. Server: private string _S = "A"; public interface IFoo { void Bar(); } private class Foo : IFoo { void Bar() { _S = "B";} } public IFoo GetFoo() { return new Foo(); } Client: IFoo foo = serverChannel.GetFoo(); foo.Bar(); Remoting is legacy (everyone keeps pointing to WCF instead) and WCF does not support this at all basically ( http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2431510 ), so how should I implement this kind of behavior? Using 3rd party components is possible iff required. I searched on SO but found no similar question. If this has indeed been answered before, just let me know and I'll delete.

  Read the article

• How to append a tag after a link with BeaufitulSoup

  - by systempuntoout

  Starting from an Html input like this: <p> <a href="http://www.foo.com">this if foo</a> <a href="http://www.bar.com">this if bar</a> </p> using BeautifulSoup, i would like to change this Html in: <p> <a href="http://www.foo.com">this if foo</a><b>OK</b> <a href="http://www.bar.com">this if bar</a><b>OK</b> </p> Is it possible to do this using BeautifulSoup?

  Read the article

• How do you like to define your module-wide variables in drupal 6?

  - by sprugman

  I'm in my module file. I want to define some complex variables for use throughout the module. For simple things, I'm doing this: function mymodule_init() { define('SOME_CONSTANT', 'foo bar'); } But that won't work for more complex structures. Here are some ideas that I've thought of: global: function mymodule_init() { $GLOBALS['mymodule_var'] = array('foo' => 'bar'); } variable_set: function mymodule_init() { variable_set('mymodule_var', array('foo' => 'bar')); } property of a module class: class MyModule { static $var = array('foo' => 'bar'); } Variable_set/_get seems like the most "drupal" way, but I'm drawn toward the class setup. Are there any drawbacks to that? Any other approaches out there?

  Read the article

• CodeContracts: Possibly calling a method on a null reference

  - by dtb

  I'm having an argument with the CodeContracts static analysis tool. My code: class Foo { private static Foo instance = new Foo(); private string bar; public Foo() { bar = "Hello World"; } public static int BarLength() { return instance.bar.Length; // <<-- } } The tool tells me that instance.bar may be a null reference. I believe the opposite. Who is right? How can I prove it wrong?

  Read the article

• Python: What does _("str") do?

  - by Rosarch

  I see this in the Django source code: description = _("Comma-separated integers") description = _("Date (without time)") What does it do? I try it in Python 3.1.3 and it fails: >>> foo = _("bar") Traceback (most recent call last): File "<pyshell#0>", line 1, in <module> foo = _("bar") NameError: name '_' is not defined No luck in 2.4.4 either: >>> foo = _("bar") Traceback (most recent call last): File "<pyshell#1>", line 1, in -toplevel- foo = _("bar") NameError: name '_' is not defined What's going on here?

  Read the article

• C++ - Creating a god object

  - by Greg Kritzman

  Hypothetical situation that I'm struggling to get my head past. HoldsFooBar.h: #include "foo.h" #include "bar.h" class HoldsFooBar{ foo F; bar B; }; foo.h: //includes? class foo{ HoldsFooBar *H; void Baz(); }; bar.h: //includes? class bar{ HoldsFooBar *H; void Qux(); }; I'm trying to get F to get a hold of B. In all other languages I've worked with, I would be able to H->B.Qux();, but I'm totally lost in C++. At the includes lines in foo.h and bar.h, it seems like my options are to forward-declare class HoldsFooBar; but then I can only access H, and F and B cannot see each other. Likewise, I can #include "HoldsFooBar.h" but because of my include guards, something ends up not getting linked properly, so the program doesn't run. Is what I'm trying to do even possible? Thank you very much! Any help would be appreciated!

  Read the article

• Is read-only auto-imlemented property possible?

  - by abatishchev

  Hello. I found a topic on MSDN that talks that yes, this is possible. I did a test that seems to break this statement: using System; namespace Test { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { Foo f = new Foo("1"); Console.WriteLine(f.Bar); // prints 1 f.Test("2"); Console.WriteLine(f.Bar);// successfully prints 2 } } class Foo { public Foo(string b) { this.Bar = b; } public string Bar { get; private set; } public void Test(string b) { // this would be impossible for readonly field! // next error would be occur: CS0191 or CS0191 // A readonly field cannot be assigned to (except in a constructor or a variable initializer) this.Bar = b; } } } Where am I wrong?

  Read the article

• Strange macro declaration in C

  - by Andrey Atapin

  Exploring libusb-1.0.9 source code, I have found such line (./os/poll_windows.c:78): #define CHECK_INIT_POLLING do {if(!is_polling_set) init_polling();} while(0) As for me this is the same like: #define CHECK_INIT_POLLING if(!is_polling_set) init_polling(); Is there any reason to loop that expression? UPDATE: I couldn't still realize what'd be wrong after the answers, and the following example helped: #include <stdio.h> #define TEST if(test) foo(); #define TEST_DO do { if(test) foo(); } while(0) int test = 1; void foo() { printf("%s", "Foo called"); } int main(int argc, char** argv) { if(argc > 1) TEST_DO; /* LINE 12 */ else printf("%s", "skipping..."); return 0; } If you put TEST at line 12, a compiler will give an error "error: ‘else’ without a previous ‘if’". Hope, this will help someone.

  Read the article

• C++: Validate a pointer?

  - by Rosarch

  If I have a pointer, like char* foo, is there any way to determine if foo points to a valid location in memory? (So, foo is not NULL, and delete has not yet been called on it.)

  Read the article

• Lucene Search for documents that have a particular field?

  - by RP

  Lucene.Net - Is there a way to query for documents that contain a particular field. Lets say some of my documents have a field 'foo' and some do not. I want to find all documents that have the field 'foo' - regardless of what the value of foo is. How do I do this? Is it some sort of TermQuery?

  Read the article

• what to use in place of std::map::emplace?

  - by kfmfe04

  For containers such as std::map< std::string, std::unique_ptr< Foo >>, it looks like emplace() has yet to be implemented in stdc++ as of gcc 4.7.2. Unfortunately, I can't store Foo directly by value as it is an abstract super-class. As a simple, but inefficient, place-holder, I've just been using std::map< std::string, Foo* > in conjunction with a std::vector< std::unique_ptr< Foo >> for garbage collection. Do you have a interim solution that is more efficient and more easily replaced once emplace() is available?

  Read the article

• How to do inline paste from system buffer in Vim?

  - by yetapb

  When pasting from the system buffer in a line like foo( someVal , <cursor is here>, someVal3); If I use "*p I get foo( someVal, , someVal3); <pasted text> If I use "*P I get <pasted text> foo( someVal, , someVal3); but I want foo( someVal, <pasted text>, someVal3 ); How can I get the result I want? edit If there is a newline in the buffer as @amardeep suspects, is there a way I can tell vim to ignore it?

  Read the article

• What kind of memory reclamation algorithm does MRI Ruby 1.8 use?

  - by Foo

  In other languages you have a number of possibilities usually for memory reclamation: Mark objects and then remove them Explicit retain and release Count references to objects Internal heap disposition How does Ruby work?

  Read the article

• R: How to replace elements of a data.frame?

  - by John

  I'm trying to replace elements of a data.frame containing "#N/A" with "NULL", and I'm running into problems: foo <- data.frame("day"= c(1, 3, 5, 7), "od" = c(0.1, "#N/A", 0.4, 0.8)) indices_of_NAs <- which(foo == "#N/A") replace(foo, indices_of_NAs, "NULL") Error in [<-.data.frame(*tmp*, list, value = "NULL") : new columns would leave holes after existing columns I think that the problem is that my index is treating the data.frame as a vector, but that the replace function is treating it differently somehow, but I'm not sure what the issue is?

  Read the article

• How do I return '' for an empty node's text() in XPath?

  - by joeforker

  <td></td><td>foo</td> I would like to return ['', 'foo'] but libxml's xpath //td/text() returns just ['foo']. How do I find the empty tag as '' instead of (not matched)?

  Read the article

• WCF: Is there a way to return an object that is able to execute on the server?

  - by mafutrct

  Coming from a Java background, this is the way I'm thinking: The server provides an object to the client. This object should be able to execute on the server. Server: private string _S = "A"; public interface IFoo { void Bar(); } private class Foo : IFoo { void Bar() { _S = "B";} } public IFoo GetFoo() { return new Foo(); } Client: IFoo foo = serverChannel.GetFoo(); foo.Bar(); Is this possible? Or is my understanding wrong and this is not how it works in WCF? What would be a better design?

  Read the article

• Why there is no static structs in C#, but static methods within them exists?

  - by sfedorov1982

  // OK struct MyStruct { static void Foo() { } } // Error static struct MyStruct { }

  Read the article

• Reload Method or Object in IDLE

  - by GSto

  when using idle, I know you can reload a module if it's changed like this: import foo reload(foo) if I only import part of a module, is there a way to reload it in a similar matter? from foo import bar

  Read the article

• Prototype with a callback problem

  - by Lisio

  function Foo() { this.bar = false; } Foo.prototype={ onLoad: function() { this.bar=true; }, create: function(id) { SomeClass.someMethod({ id: id, onWorkIsDone: this.onLoad }); } }; var temp=new Foo(); temp.create(); This sample has a logic error in string 'onWorkIsDone: this.onLoad'. What I have to place instead of 'this.onLoad' to make SomeClass call exactly the temp.onLoad method when it finishes it's work?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68  | Next Page >