Search Results

Search found 28052 results on 1123 pages for 't sql tuesday'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 627/1123 | < Previous Page | 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634  | Next Page >

  • How to use a data type (table) defined in another database in SQL2k8?

    - by Victor Rodrigues
    I have a Table Type defined in a database. It is used as a table-valued parameter in a stored procedure. I would like to call this procedure from another database, and in order to pass the parameter, I need to reference this defined type. But when I do DECLARE @table dbOtherDatabase.dbo.TypeName , it tells me that The type name 'dbOtherDatabase.dbo.TypeName' contains more than the maximum number of prefixes. The maximum is 1. How could I reference this table type?

    Read the article

  • Date and time Query - problem

    - by Gold
    hi i try to run this query: select * from WorkTbl where ((Tdate = '20100414' AND Ttime = '06:00') and (Tdate <= '20100415' AND Ttime <= '06:00')) i have this date: 14/04/2010 and time: 14:00 i cant see hem, how to fix the query ? thank's in advance

    Read the article

  • Complicated conditional SQL query

    - by DevAno1
    I'm not even sure if it's possible but I need it for my Access database. So I have following db structure : Now I need to perform a query that takes category_id from my product and do the magic : - let's say product belongs to console (category_id is in table Console) - from console_types take type_id, where category_id == category_id - but if product belongs to console_game (category_id is in table console_game) - from console_game take game_cat_id, where category_id == category_id I'm not sure if mysql is capable of such thing. If not I'm really f&%ranked up. Maybe there is a way to split this into 2,3 separate queries ?

    Read the article

  • Writing a query to find MAX number in PL/SQL

    - by user2461116
    I am suppose to Write a query that will display the largest number of movies rented by one member and that member's name. Give the output column a meaningful name such as MAXIMUM NUMBER. This is what I have. select max(maximum_movies) from (select count(*)maximum_movies from mm_member join mm_rental on mm_rental.member_id = mm_member.member_id group by first, last); I got the maximum number but the output should be like this. First Last Maximum_movies John Doe 4 But the output is Maximum_movies 4 Any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • Insert Stored Procedure, Using Asp.Net WebForm to Insert new [Customer]

    - by user2953815
    Can someone please help me create a stored procedure to insert a new customer from a web form. I am having difficulty making the state a drop down list for customer to pick a state from the list and having that inserted into the database. INSERT INTO Customer ( Cust_First, Cust_Middle, Cust_Last, Cust_Phone, Cust_Alt_Phone, Cust_Email, Add_Line1, Add_Line2, Add_Bill_Line1, Add_Bill_Line2, City, State_Prov_Name, Postal_Zip_Code, Country_ID ) VALUES ( @Cust_First, @Cust_Middle, @Cust_Last, @Cust_Phone, @Cust_Alt_Phone, @Cust_Email, @Add_Line1, @Add_Line2, @Add_Bill_Line1, @Add_Bill_Line2, @City, @State_Prov_Name, @Postal_Zip_Code, @Country_ID )"> <InsertParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="Cust_First" Type="String"></asp:Parameter> <asp:Parameter Name="Cust_Middle" Type="String"></asp:Parameter> <asp:Parameter Name="Cust_Last" Type="String"></asp:Parameter> <asp:Parameter Name="Cust_Phone" Type="String"></asp:Parameter> <asp:Parameter Name="Cust_Alt_Phone" Type="String"></asp:Parameter> <asp:Parameter Name="Cust_Email" Type="String"></asp:Parameter> <asp:Parameter Name="Add_Line1" Type="String"></asp:Parameter> <asp:Parameter Name="Add_Line2" Type="String"></asp:Parameter> <asp:Parameter Name="Add_Bill_Line1" Type="String"></asp:Parameter> <asp:Parameter Name="Add_Bill_Line2" Type="String"></asp:Parameter> <asp:Parameter Name="City" Type="String"></asp:Parameter> <asp:Parameter Name="Postal_Zip_Code" Type="String"></asp:Parameter> <asp:Parameter Name="Cust_ID" Type="Int32"></asp:Parameter> <asp:Parameter Name="State_Prov_Name" Type="String"></asp:Parameter> <asp:Parameter Name="Country_Name" Type="String"></asp:Parameter> </InsertParameters>

    Read the article

  • MySQL: Count occurrences of known (or enumerated) distinct values

    - by Eilidh
    After looking at how to count the occurrences of distinct values in a field, I am wondering how to count the occurrences of each distinct value if the distinct values are known (or enumerated). For example, if I have a simple table - TrafficLight Colour ------------ ------ 1 Red 2 Amber 3 Red 4 Red 5 Green 6 Green where one column (in this case Colour) has known (or enumerated) distinct values, how could I return the count for each colour as a separate value, rather than as an array, as in the linked example. To return an array with a count of each colour (using the same method as in the linked example), the query would be something like SELECT Colour COUNT(*) AS ColourCount FROM TrafficLights GROUP BY Colour, and return an array - Colour ColourCount ------ ----------- Red 3 Amber 1 Green 2 What I would like to do is to return the count for each Colour AS a separate total (e.g. RedCount). How can I do this?

    Read the article

  • Generate dynamic UPDATE command from Expression<Func<T, T>>

    - by Rui Jarimba
    I'm trying to generate an UPDATE command based on Expression trees (for a batch update). Assuming the following UPDATE command: UPDATE Product SET ProductTypeId = 123, ProcessAttempts = ProcessAttempts + 1 For an expression like this: Expression<Func<Product, Product>> updateExpression = entity => new Product() { ProductTypeId = 123, ProcessAttempts = entity.ProcessAttempts + 1 }; How can I generate the SET part of the command? SET ProductTypeId = 123, ProcessAttempts = ProcessAttempts + 1

    Read the article

  • data type mismatch when comparing dates in MS-Access

    - by jonos
    I have dates stored in an MS-Access table in the 'General Date' format. I'm trying to create a query that returns records between a specific date range (all records from March 2010) however I encounter a 'data type mismatch in critera expression' message. Here is my statement; SELECT Loan.loan_datetimeLeant, product_name, [product_artist/director], product_category, loanItem_cost FROM Loan INNER JOIN ((Product INNER JOIN Item ON Product.[product_id] = Item.[product_id]) INNER JOIN Loan_Items ON Item.[item_id] = Loan_Items.[item_id]) ON (Loan.[cust_id] = Loan_Items.[cust_id]) AND (Loan.[loan_datetimeLeant] = Loan_Items.[loan_datetimeLeant]) WHERE Loan.loan_datetimeLeant = '01/03/2010' AND Loan.loan_datetimeLeant <= '31/03/2010' ORDER BY Loan.loan_datetimeLeant ; I have tried variations on the date format (mm/dd/yyyy, dd/mm/yyyy 00:00:00)

    Read the article

  • Database indexes and their Big-O notation

    - by miket2e
    I'm trying to understand the performance of database indexes in terms of Big-O notation. Without knowing much about it, I would guess that: Querying on a primary key or unique index will give you a O(1) lookup time. Querying on a non-unique index will also give a O(1) time, albeit maybe the '1' is slower than for the unique index (?) Querying on a column without an index will give a O(N) lookup time (full table scan). Is this generally correct ? Will querying on a primary key ever give worse performance than O(1) ? My specific concern is for SQLite, but I'd be interested in knowing to what extent this varies between different databases too.

    Read the article

  • select all values from a dimension for which there are facts in all other dimensions

    - by ideasculptor
    I've tried to simplify for the purposes of asking this question. Hopefully, this will be comprehensible. Basically, I have a fact table with a time dimension, another dimension, and a hierarchical dimension. For the purposes of the question, let's assume the hierarchical dimension is zip code and state. The other dimension is just descriptive. Let's call it 'customer' Let's assume there are 50 customers. I need to find the set of states for which there is at least one zip code in which EVERY customer has at least one fact row for each day in the time dimension. If a zip code has only 49 customers, I don't care about it. If even one of the 50 customers doesn't have a value for even 1 day in a zip code, I don't care about it. Finally, I also need to know which zip codes qualified the state for selection. Note, there is no requirement that every zip code have a full data set - only that at least one zip code does. I don't mind making multiple queries and doing some processing on the client side. This is a dataset that only needs to be generated once per day and can be cached. I don't even see a particularly clean way to do it with multiple queries short of simply brute-force iteration, and there are a heck of a lot of 'zip codes' in the data set (not actually zip codes, but the there are approximately 100,000 entries in the lower level of the hierarchy and several hundred in the top level, so zipcode-state is a reasonable analogy)

    Read the article

  • CakePHP adding columns to a table

    - by vette982
    I have a Profile model/controller in my cake app as well as an index.ctp view in /views/profiles. Now, when I go to add a column to my table that is already filled with data, and then add the corresponding code to the view to pick up this column's data, it just gives me an empty result. My model: <?php class Profile extends AppModel { var $name = 'Profile'; } ?> My controller: <?php class ProfilesController extends AppController { var $name = 'Profiles'; function index() { $this->set('profiles', $this->Profile->find('all')); } } ?> My views printing (stripped down): <?php foreach ($profiles as $profile): ?> <?php echo $profile['Profile']['id']; ?> <?php echo $profile['Profile']['username']; ?> <?php echo $profile['Profile']['created']; ?> <?php echo $profile['Profile']['thumbnail'];?> <?php echo $profile['Profile']['account'];?> <?php endforeach; ?> Basically, the columns id, username, column, thumbnail always have been printing fine, but when I add a column called accountit returns no information (nothing prints, but no errors). Any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • How to Generate XML from Database

    - by Nisarg Mehta
    Hi , I am fetching data from two tables CARRIER_IFTA ,IFTA_NAME. My Select Query is like below.. SELECT t1.IFTA_LICENSE_NUMBER,t1.IFTA_BASE_STATE,t2.NAME_TYPE,t2.NAME from CARRIER_IFTA t1 inner join IFTA_NAME t2 on t1.IFTA_LICENSE_NUMBER=t2.IFTA_LICENSE_NUMBER My Data is coming in this way... IFTA_LICENSE_NUMBER IFTA_BASE_STATE NAME_TYPE NAME -------------------------------------------------------- 630908333 US LG XYZ 630908333 US MG PQR 730908344 US LG ABC Now using XSLT I want to generate XML like this <T0019> <IFTA_ACCOUNT> <IFTA_LICENSE_NUMBER>630908333</IFTA_LICENSE_NUMBER> <IFTA_BASE_STATE>US</IFTA_BASE_STATE> <IFTA_NAME> <NAME_TYPE>LG<NAME_TYPE> <NAME>XYZ</NAME> </IFTA_NAME> <IFTA_NAME> <NAME_TYPE>MG<NAME_TYPE> <NAME>PQR</NAME> <IFTA_NAME> </IFTA_ACCOUNT> <IFTA_ACCOUNT> <IFTA_LICENSE_NUMBER>730908344</IFTA_LICENSE_NUMBER> <IFTA_BASE_STATE>US</IFTA_BASE_STATE> <IFTA_NAME> <NAME_TYPE>LG<NAME_TYPE> <NAME>ABC</NAME> </IFTA_NAME> </IFTA_ACCOUNT> </T0019> i have used below xslt but it is not giveng me desire result ... <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" version="2.0"> <xsl:template match="/ROWSET"> <xsl:element name="T0019"> <xsl:apply-templates select="IFTAACCOUNT"/> </xsl:element> </xsl:template> <xsl:template match="IFTAACCOUNT"> <xsl:element name="IFTAACCOUNT"> <xsl:apply-templates select="IFTA_CARRIER_ID_NUMBER"/> </xsl:element> </xsl:template> <xsl:template match="IFTA_LICENSE_NUMBER"> <xsl:element name="IFTA_LICENSE_NUMBER"> <xsl:apply-templates /> </xsl:element> </xsl:template> <xsl:template match="IFTA_BASE_STATE"> <xsl:element name="IFTA_BASE_STATE"> <xsl:apply-templates /> </xsl:element> </xsl:template> <xsl:template match="IRP_NAME"> <IRP_NAME> <xsl:apply-templates select="NAME"/> <xsl:apply-templates select="NAME_TYPE"/> </IRP_NAME> </xsl:template> <xsl:template match="NAME"> <xsl:element name="NAME"> <xsl:value-of select="." /> </xsl:element> </xsl:template> <xsl:template match="NAME_TYPE"> <xsl:element name="NAME_TYPE"> <xsl:apply-templates /> </xsl:element> </xsl:template> </xsl:stylesheet> but it is not giving desire result ... Please help me ... Thanks in Advance...

    Read the article

  • how to rotate around each record in linq and show that in view

    - by Sadegh
    Hi, I have four tables in my database and i want to join that's and return record's and show that into searchController! My query is this: public IQueryable PerformSearch(string query) { if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(query)) { var results = from tbl1 in context.Table1 join tbl2 in context.Table2 on tbl1.Id equals tbl2.Id join tbl3 in context.Table3 on tbl2.Id equals tbl3.Id join tbl4 in context.Table4 on tbl3.Id equals tbl4.Id where tbl1.col2.Contains(query) orderby tbl1.Count descending select new { col1 = tbl1.Col1, col1 = tbl1.Col1, col1 = tbl1.Col1, . . . }; return results.AsQueryable(); } else return null; } And this method called in SearchController as below: public class SearchController : System.Web.Mvc.Controller { public System.Web.Mvc.ActionResult Search(System.String query) { var search = new Search(); ViewData["result"] = search.PerformSearch(query); return View("Search"); } } I don't know how i can rotate around each record (plus vs intellisense feature) returned by PeformSeach method and show that in view! Also is this a good way? thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Meaning of tA tC and tP

    - by Greg Wiley
    If this is a duplicate I appoligize, but looking for two-letter strings is quite hard in any search. I'm looking for the meaning of tA tC and tP in the context of a mysql query. And in the spirit of "teaching a man how to fish" it would be great if you could point me in the right direction of where to find this info in the future. Edit: The Query $wpdb->get_row($wpdb->prepare("SELECT tA.* FROM ".AMYLITE_ADS." tA, ".AMYLITE_ADS_CAMPAIGNS." tC, ".AMYLITE_PACKAGES." tP WHERE tA.id=tC.ad_id AND tC.campaign_id=tP.campaign_id AND tP.zone_id=%d AND tP.date_end>CURDATE() GROUP BY tA.id ORDER BY RAND()", $zone->id));

    Read the article

  • Accessing non-related entities in LinqToSql entity classes

    - by Chris Johnson
    In LinqToSql, if I want to access a non-related entity in an entity partial class, how do I do this without creating a new DataContext? Here's the scenario: I have the tables Client, IssueType and ClientIssueType. A Client may specify a list of IssueTypes if they do not want to use the default IssueTypes. I have the default IssueTypes in the ClientIssueType table with a ClientId of null. In my Client partial I'd like to try to retrieve all IssueTypes, and if none are found, return all default IssueTypes. The only way I can see of accessing the IssueTypes with a null ClientId is by accessing the table through a new DataContext, which is problematic once I want to start assigning them to Issues. Where am I going wrong?

    Read the article

  • rails include with options

    - by holden
    Is it possible to limit an AR :include to say only pull in one record... Item.find(:all, :include => [ :external_ratings, :photos => LIMIT 1 ]) I have a list of items and each item has between 5 and 15 photos. I want to load a photo id into memory, but i don't need all of them, I just want to preview the first one. Is there a way to do this?

    Read the article

  • Nested query to find details in table B for maximum value in table A

    - by jpatokal
    I've got a huge bunch of flights travelling between airports. Each airport has an ID and (x,y) coordinates. For a given list of flights, I want to find the northernmost (highest x) airport visited. Here's the query I'm currently using: SELECT name,iata,icao,apid,x,y FROM airports WHERE y=(SELECT MAX(y) FROM airports AS a , flights AS f WHERE (f.src_apid=a.apid OR f.dst_apid=a.apid) ) This works beautifully and reasonably fast as long as y is unique, but fails once it isn't. What I'd want to do instead is find the MAX(y) in the subquery, but return the unique apid for the airport with the highest y. Any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • Removing "Using temporary; Using filesort" from this MySQL select+join+group by query

    - by claytontstanley
    I have the following query: select t.Chunk as LeftChunk, t.ChunkHash as LeftChunkHash, q.Chunk as RightChunk, q.ChunkHash as RightChunkHash, count(t.ChunkHash) as ChunkCount from chunksubset as t join chunksubset as q on t.ID = q.ID group by LeftChunkHash, RightChunkHash And the following explain table: id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra 1 SIMPLE subsets ref PRIMARY,IDIndex,SubsetIndex SubsetIndex 767 const 522014 "Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort" 1 SIMPLE subsets eq_ref PRIMARY,IDIndex,SubsetIndex PRIMARY 771 sotero.subsets.Id,const 1 "Using where; Using index" 1 SIMPLE c ref IDIndex IDIndex 4 sotero.subsets.Id 12 "Using where" 1 SIMPLE c ref IDIndex IDIndex 4 sotero.subsets.Id 12 note the "using temporary; using filesort". When this query is run, I quickly run out of RAM (presumably b/c of the temp table), and then the HDD kicks in, and the query slows to a halt. I thought it might be an index issue, so I started adding a few that sort of made sense: Table Non_unique Key_name Seq_in_index Column_name Collation Cardinality Sub_part Packed Null Index_type Comment Index_comment chunks 0 PRIMARY 1 ChunkId A 17796190 NULL NULL BTREE chunks 1 ChunkHashIndex 1 ChunkHash A 243783 NULL NULL BTREE chunks 1 IDIndex 1 Id A 1483015 NULL NULL BTREE chunks 1 ChunkIndex 1 Chunk A 243783 NULL NULL BTREE chunks 1 ChunkTypeIndex 1 ChunkType A 2 NULL NULL BTREE chunks 1 chunkHashByChunkIDIndex 1 ChunkHash A 243783 NULL NULL BTREE chunks 1 chunkHashByChunkIDIndex 2 ChunkId A 17796190 NULL NULL BTREE chunks 1 chunkHashByChunkTypeIndex 1 ChunkHash A 243783 NULL NULL BTREE chunks 1 chunkHashByChunkTypeIndex 2 ChunkType A 261708 NULL NULL BTREE chunks 1 chunkHashByIDIndex 1 ChunkHash A 243783 NULL NULL BTREE chunks 1 chunkHashByIDIndex 2 Id A 17796190 NULL NULL BTREE But still using the temporary table. The db engine is MyISAM. How can I get rid of the using temporary; using filesort in this query? Just changing to InnoDB w/o explaining the underlying cause is not a particularly satisfying answer. Besides, if the solution is to just add the proper index, then that's much easier than migrating to another db engine.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634  | Next Page >