Search Results

Search found 13429 results on 538 pages for 'model reject'.

Page 63/538 | < Previous Page | 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70  | Next Page >

• auto focus camera on model

  - by bob

  I have the following model <MeshGeometry3D x:Key="SphereOR10GR13" Positions="121.4130 33.9882 64.3701 85.0383 102.2932 168.1890 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 68.8637 96.3488 159.4094 82.9020 105.2468 168.1890 36.2556 196.8622 64.3701 85.0383 138.7499 159.4094 148.6907 0.0000 23.3858 148.6907 260.7480 23.3858 89.4149 143.2779 146.1417 133.5125 17.5473 43.2677 55.2861 66.8433 108.0315 103.1995 66.8433 108.0315 45.2233 183.7492 108.0315 95.7690 82.0510 146.1417 73.5422 138.7499 168.1890 73.5422 102.2932 159.4094 95.7690 82.0510 127.6378 113.5304 183.7492 108.0315 141.4439 9.9759 23.3858 133.5125 17.5473 64.3701 45.2233 50.9146 85.5906 141.4439 238.9917 43.2677 82.9020 105.2468 188.7008 62.2651 82.0510 146.1417 113.5304 50.9146 85.5906 22.8432 220.2245 43.2677 55.2861 167.1189 108.0315 148.6907 260.7480 23.3858 121.4130 196.8622 85.5906 103.1995 167.1189 108.0315 121.4130 33.9882 64.3701 148.6907 0.0000 23.3858 89.4149 96.3488 159.4094 82.9020 135.2862 168.1890 82.9020 105.2468 188.7008 103.1995 66.8433 108.0315 0.0000 260.7480 23.3858 10.2234 238.9917 23.3858 89.4149 96.3488 146.1417 85.0383 138.7499 168.1890 121.4130 196.8622 64.3701 95.7690 153.5077 146.1417 133.5125 17.5473 43.2677 22.8432 220.2245 43.2677 55.2861 66.8433 127.6378 45.2233 50.9146 108.0315 95.7690 153.5077 127.6378 0.0000 260.7480 0.0000 73.5422 102.2932 168.1890 113.5304 183.7492 85.5906 62.2651 82.0510 146.1417 113.5304 50.9146 108.0315 85.0383 138.7499 168.1890 68.8637 143.2779 159.4094 55.2861 167.1189 108.0315 133.5125 220.2245 43.2677 133.5125 220.2245 64.3701 22.8432 220.2245 64.3701 89.4149 143.2779 159.4094 148.6907 0.0000 23.3858 62.2651 82.0510 127.6378 10.2234 9.9759 43.2677 77.1146 105.2468 168.1890 82.9020 135.2862 168.1890 73.5422 138.7499 159.4094 10.2234 9.9759 23.3858 62.2651 153.5077 146.1417 36.2556 33.9882 85.5906 133.5125 220.2245 64.3701 85.0383 102.2932 168.1890 22.8432 220.2245 43.2677 113.5304 183.7492 108.0315 36.2556 33.9882 85.5906 22.8432 17.5473 43.2677 141.4439 238.9917 43.2677 36.2556 196.8622 64.3701 82.9020 135.2862 168.1890 45.2233 183.7492 108.0315 148.6907 260.7480 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 23.3858 73.5422 102.2932 159.4094 82.9020 105.2468 188.7008 55.2861 66.8433 127.6378 103.1995 66.8433 127.6378 22.8432 220.2245 64.3701 36.2556 33.9882 64.3701 77.1146 105.2468 188.7008 62.2651 153.5077 127.6378 0.0000 260.7480 0.0000 22.8432 17.5473 64.3701 10.2234 238.9917 43.2677 55.2861 66.8433 108.0315 103.1995 66.8433 108.0315 73.5422 102.2932 159.4094 77.1146 105.2468 188.7008 85.0383 138.7499 159.4094 45.2233 50.9146 85.5906 133.5125 17.5473 43.2677 0.0000 0.0000 23.3858 89.4149 143.2779 146.1417 103.1995 66.8433 127.6378 22.8432 17.5473 43.2677 85.0383 102.2932 168.1890 55.2861 167.1189 127.6378 22.8432 220.2245 64.3701 68.8637 96.3488 146.1417 103.1995 167.1189 127.6378 148.6907 260.7480 23.3858 95.7690 153.5077 146.1417 133.5125 220.2245 43.2677 62.2651 82.0510 127.6378 77.1146 135.2862 188.7008 10.2234 238.9917 43.2677 141.4439 238.9917 23.3858 82.9020 105.2468 168.1890 89.4149 96.3488 159.4094 45.2233 183.7492 85.5906 73.5422 102.2932 168.1890 85.0383 102.2932 159.4094 121.4130 33.9882 85.5906 55.2861 167.1189 127.6378 77.1146 135.2862 188.7008 95.7690 153.5077 146.1417 121.4130 33.9882 85.5906 141.4439 238.9917 23.3858 133.5125 17.5473 64.3701 10.2234 9.9759 43.2677 45.2233 50.9146 108.0315 133.5125 220.2245 64.3701 89.4149 96.3488 146.1417 113.5304 50.9146 108.0315 121.4130 196.8622 64.3701 95.7690 153.5077 127.6378 133.5125 17.5473 64.3701 82.9020 105.2468 168.1890 73.5422 138.7499 159.4094 62.2651 153.5077 146.1417 89.4149 143.2779 146.1417 68.8637 143.2779 146.1417 121.4130 33.9882 64.3701 103.1995 167.1189 108.0315 141.4439 9.9759 43.2677 141.4439 9.9759 23.3858 95.7690 82.0510 146.1417 36.2556 33.9882 85.5906 77.1146 135.2862 168.1890 10.2234 238.9917 43.2677 77.1146 105.2468 188.7008 10.2234 9.9759 43.2677 62.2651 153.5077 127.6378 85.0383 102.2932 159.4094 113.5304 50.9146 85.5906 113.5304 183.7492 108.0315 55.2861 66.8433 127.6378 103.1995 66.8433 127.6378 36.2556 33.9882 64.3701 10.2234 9.9759 23.3858 36.2556 196.8622 85.5906 0.0000 260.7480 23.3858 82.9020 135.2862 188.7008 22.8432 17.5473 43.2677 62.2651 153.5077 146.1417 68.8637 96.3488 159.4094 148.6907 260.7480 0.0000 73.5422 138.7499 168.1890 85.0383 138.7499 168.1890 68.8637 96.3488 146.1417 121.4130 196.8622 85.5906 68.8637 143.2779 146.1417 141.4439 238.9917 23.3858 89.4149 143.2779 159.4094 22.8432 17.5473 64.3701 73.5422 138.7499 168.1890 45.2233 183.7492 85.5906 77.1146 105.2468 168.1890 68.8637 96.3488 146.1417 148.6907 260.7480 0.0000 141.4439 9.9759 43.2677 0.0000 260.7480 23.3858 113.5304 183.7492 85.5906 148.6907 0.0000 0.0000 55.2861 167.1189 108.0315 22.8432 17.5473 64.3701 121.4130 196.8622 64.3701 103.1995 167.1189 108.0315 10.2234 238.9917 23.3858 68.8637 143.2779 159.4094 36.2556 196.8622 85.5906 45.2233 50.9146 108.0315 77.1146 105.2468 168.1890 0.0000 260.7480 0.0000 141.4439 238.9917 43.2677 95.7690 153.5077 127.6378 95.7690 82.0510 146.1417 95.7690 82.0510 127.6378 103.1995 167.1189 127.6378 77.1146 135.2862 168.1890 36.2556 196.8622 64.3701 45.2233 183.7492 108.0315 89.4149 96.3488 159.4094 82.9020 135.2862 188.7008 121.4130 196.8622 85.5906 89.4149 143.2779 159.4094 77.1146 135.2862 168.1890 148.6907 0.0000 0.0000 45.2233 50.9146 85.5906 62.2651 153.5077 127.6378 85.0383 138.7499 159.4094 10.2234 9.9759 23.3858 141.4439 9.9759 43.2677 77.1146 135.2862 188.7008 85.0383 102.2932 159.4094 73.5422 138.7499 159.4094 95.7690 82.0510 127.6378 113.5304 50.9146 85.5906 133.5125 220.2245 43.2677 73.5422 102.2932 168.1890 141.4439 9.9759 23.3858 82.9020 135.2862 188.7008 121.4130 33.9882 85.5906 62.2651 82.0510 146.1417 62.2651 82.0510 127.6378 148.6907 0.0000 0.0000 55.2861 66.8433 108.0315 89.4149 96.3488 146.1417 55.2861 167.1189 127.6378 68.8637 143.2779 146.1417 10.2234 238.9917 23.3858 45.2233 183.7492 85.5906 68.8637 96.3488 159.4094 36.2556 33.9882 64.3701 113.5304 183.7492 85.5906 103.1995 167.1189 127.6378 36.2556 196.8622 85.5906 113.5304 50.9146 108.0315 68.8637 143.2779 159.4094 " TextureCoordinates="33.9882 64.3701 85.0383 102.2932 0.0000 0.0000 -96.3488 159.4094 82.9020 105.2468 -36.2556 64.3701 85.0383 138.7499 148.6907 0.0000 260.7480 23.3858 89.4149 143.2779 17.5473 43.2677 55.2861 66.8433 103.1995 66.8433 -45.2233 108.0315 95.7690 82.0510 -138.7499 168.1890 73.5422 159.4094 95.7690 127.6378 -113.5304 108.0315 9.9759 23.3858 17.5473 64.3701 45.2233 85.5906 238.9917 43.2677 82.9020 188.7008 -82.0510 146.1417 50.9146 85.5906 22.8432 220.2245 55.2861 167.1189 -148.6907 23.3858 -121.4130 85.5906 103.1995 167.1189 121.4130 33.9882 148.6907 23.3858 89.4149 96.3488 135.2862 168.1890 105.2468 188.7008 66.8433 108.0315 0.0000 23.3858 10.2234 238.9917 89.4149 146.1417 85.0383 138.7499 -121.4130 64.3701 -95.7690 146.1417 133.5125 17.5473 -220.2245 43.2677 -66.8433 127.6378 -50.9146 108.0315 95.7690 153.5077 -260.7480 0.0000 -102.2932 168.1890 183.7492 85.5906 62.2651 82.0510 113.5304 50.9146 -85.0383 168.1890 -68.8637 159.4094 -55.2861 108.0315 220.2245 43.2677 133.5125 220.2245 -220.2245 64.3701 89.4149 143.2779 0.0000 23.3858 62.2651 127.6378 10.2234 43.2677 77.1146 105.2468 -82.9020 168.1890 -138.7499 159.4094 10.2234 9.9759 -153.5077 146.1417 36.2556 33.9882 220.2245 64.3701 102.2932 168.1890 -22.8432 43.2677 113.5304 183.7492 36.2556 85.5906 -17.5473 43.2677 -141.4439 43.2677 36.2556 196.8622 82.9020 135.2862 -183.7492 108.0315 -148.6907 260.7480 0.0000 0.0000 73.5422 102.2932 82.9020 105.2468 55.2861 66.8433 103.1995 66.8433 -22.8432 64.3701 36.2556 64.3701 77.1146 188.7008 62.2651 153.5077 0.0000 260.7480 -17.5473 64.3701 -238.9917 43.2677 55.2861 108.0315 103.1995 108.0315 -102.2932 159.4094 -105.2468 188.7008 -85.0383 159.4094 45.2233 50.9146 133.5125 43.2677 0.0000 23.3858 143.2779 146.1417 66.8433 127.6378 22.8432 17.5473 85.0383 168.1890 55.2861 167.1189 22.8432 220.2245 68.8637 96.3488 103.1995 167.1189 148.6907 260.7480 153.5077 146.1417 -133.5125 43.2677 -82.0510 127.6378 -77.1146 188.7008 10.2234 238.9917 141.4439 238.9917 82.9020 168.1890 89.4149 159.4094 45.2233 183.7492 73.5422 102.2932 102.2932 159.4094 121.4130 33.9882 -55.2861 127.6378 -135.2862 188.7008 95.7690 153.5077 121.4130 85.5906 238.9917 23.3858 133.5125 64.3701 -9.9759 43.2677 45.2233 108.0315 -133.5125 64.3701 96.3488 146.1417 50.9146 108.0315 121.4130 196.8622 -95.7690 127.6378 133.5125 17.5473 105.2468 168.1890 73.5422 138.7499 -62.2651 146.1417 -89.4149 146.1417 68.8637 143.2779 121.4130 64.3701 -103.1995 108.0315 141.4439 43.2677 141.4439 9.9759 82.0510 146.1417 -33.9882 85.5906 77.1146 135.2862 -10.2234 43.2677 77.1146 105.2468 10.2234 9.9759 -153.5077 127.6378 85.0383 159.4094 113.5304 85.5906 183.7492 108.0315 55.2861 127.6378 103.1995 127.6378 -33.9882 64.3701 10.2234 23.3858 36.2556 196.8622 -260.7480 23.3858 82.9020 135.2862 22.8432 43.2677 62.2651 153.5077 68.8637 96.3488 260.7480 0.0000 73.5422 138.7499 138.7499 168.1890 68.8637 146.1417 196.8622 85.5906 -143.2779 146.1417 -141.4439 23.3858 143.2779 159.4094 22.8432 64.3701 -73.5422 168.1890 -45.2233 85.5906 77.1146 168.1890 -96.3488 146.1417 -148.6907 0.0000 9.9759 43.2677 0.0000 260.7480 -113.5304 85.5906 148.6907 0.0000 -167.1189 108.0315 22.8432 17.5473 196.8622 64.3701 167.1189 108.0315 -238.9917 23.3858 68.8637 143.2779 -196.8622 85.5906 45.2233 50.9146 -105.2468 168.1890 0.0000 0.0000 141.4439 238.9917 153.5077 127.6378 95.7690 146.1417 95.7690 82.0510 -103.1995 127.6378 -77.1146 168.1890 -196.8622 64.3701 45.2233 183.7492 96.3488 159.4094 135.2862 188.7008 121.4130 196.8622 -89.4149 159.4094 -135.2862 168.1890 0.0000 0.0000 -50.9146 85.5906 -62.2651 127.6378 138.7499 159.4094 -9.9759 23.3858 141.4439 9.9759 77.1146 135.2862 85.0383 102.2932 -73.5422 159.4094 82.0510 127.6378 113.5304 50.9146 133.5125 220.2245 73.5422 168.1890 141.4439 23.3858 -82.9020 188.7008 33.9882 85.5906 62.2651 146.1417 62.2651 82.0510 -148.6907 0.0000 -66.8433 108.0315 89.4149 96.3488 -167.1189 127.6378 -68.8637 146.1417 -10.2234 23.3858 -183.7492 85.5906 68.8637 159.4094 36.2556 33.9882 113.5304 183.7492 167.1189 127.6378 -36.2556 85.5906 113.5304 108.0315 -143.2779 159.4094 " TriangleIndices="79 2 89 2 79 223 80 66 179 66 80 7 66 7 143 143 7 114 179 38 108 38 179 66 108 38 114 108 114 7 32 2 181 2 32 99 159 2 99 2 159 48 37 177 191 177 37 28 164 60 205 60 164 8 149 102 113 102 149 210 102 210 43 43 210 216 113 26 192 26 113 102 192 26 216 192 216 210 91 209 127 209 91 186 142 157 218 157 142 62 125 178 19 178 125 22 147 170 228 170 147 75 183 231 105 231 183 134 231 134 31 31 134 132 105 76 57 76 105 231 57 76 132 57 132 134 58 74 90 74 58 44 126 161 98 161 126 172 56 20 10 20 56 69 85 110 71 110 85 129 68 97 158 97 68 120 97 120 215 215 120 232 158 117 202 117 158 97 202 117 232 202 232 120 184 220 0 220 184 168 234 41 5 41 234 29 188 156 145 156 188 198 124 86 140 86 124 73 189 11 199 11 189 52 11 52 12 12 52 30 199 27 72 27 199 11 72 27 30 72 30 52 235 21 152 21 235 128 50 131 25 131 50 153 13 180 174 180 13 18 78 206 46 206 78 229 83 222 104 222 83 84 222 84 195 195 84 47 104 88 107 88 104 222 107 88 47 107 47 84 155 92 93 92 155 154 185 101 36 101 185 233 121 141 55 141 121 196 226 224 45 224 226 182 51 106 162 106 51 14 106 14 225 225 14 9 162 139 123 139 162 106 123 139 9 123 9 14 194 61 17 61 194 221 193 144 214 144 193 109 137 133 207 133 137 42 67 111 24 111 67 150 163 81 187 81 163 33 81 33 212 212 33 6 187 136 59 136 187 81 59 136 6 59 6 33 236 176 3 176 236 169 116 167 39 167 116 230 100 200 130 200 100 171 54 138 227 138 54 203 118 63 165 63 118 1 63 1 4 4 1 77 165 146 40 146 165 63 40 146 77 40 77 1 173 96 213 96 173 53 15 94 49 94 15 65 103 16 151 16 103 217 208 70 119 70 208 166 82 211 148 211 82 160 23 175 115 175 23 87 34 35 135 35 34 201 112 64 197 64 112 219 122 190 95 190 122 204 " /> My grid size is MaxHeight="1000" MaxWidth="1000" How can I make the camera in the viewport3d show all the model something like fit view? Thank you

  Read the article

• CakePHP 3-level-deep model associatons

  - by user357452

  Hi, I am relatively new to CakePHP, I am doing fine with the documentation, but I've been trying to find a way out to this problem for weeks and I don't seem to find the solution, I am sure it is easy and maybe even automagicaly doable, but I just don't know how to find it (maybe I don't know the jargon for these kind of things) My model structure is like this: <?php class Trip extends AppModel { var $belongsTo = array( 'User' => array( 'className' => 'User', 'foreignKey' => 'user_id' ), 'Start' => array( 'className' => 'Place', 'foreignKey' => 'start_id' ), 'End' => array( 'className' => 'Place', 'foreignKey' => 'end_id' ), 'Transport' => array( 'className' => 'Transport', 'foreignKey' => 'transport_id' ) ); } ?> <?php class Place extends AppModel { var $belongsTo = array( 'User' => array( 'className' => 'User', 'foreignKey' => 'user_id' ), 'Country' => array( 'className' => 'Country', 'foreignKey' => 'country_id' ), 'State' => array( 'className' => 'State', 'foreignKey' => 'state_id' ), 'City' => array( 'className' => 'City', 'foreignKey' => 'city_id' ) ); var $hasMany = array( 'PlaceStart' => array( 'className' => 'trip', 'foreignKey' => 'start_id', 'dependent' => false ), 'PlaceEnd' => array( 'className' => 'trip', 'foreignKey' => 'end_id', 'dependent' => false ) ); } ?> <?php class State extends AppModel { var $belongsTo = array( 'Country' => array( 'className' => 'Country', 'foreignKey' => 'country_id', 'conditions' => '', 'fields' => '', 'order' => '' ) ); var $hasMany = array( 'City' => array( 'className' => 'City', 'foreignKey' => 'city_id', 'dependent' => false ) ); } ?> ... and so forth with User, City, Country, and Transport Models. What I am trying to achieve is to get all the information of the whole tree when I search for a Trip. <?php class TripController extends AppController { function index() { debug($this->Trip->find('first')); } } Outputs Array ( [Trip] => Array ( [id] => 6 [created] => 2010-05-04 00:23:59 [user_id] => 4 [start_id] => 2 [end_id] => 1 [title] => My trip [transport_id] => 1 ) [User] => Array ( [id] => 4 [name] => John Doe [email] => [email protected] ) [Start] => Array ( [id] => 2 [user_id] => 4 [country_id] => 1 [state_id] => 1 [city_id] => 1 [direccion] => Lincoln Street ) [End] => Array ( [id] => 1 [user_id] => 4 [country_id] => 1 [state_id] => 1 [city_id] => 4 [address] => Fifth Avenue ) [Transport] => Array ( [id] => 1 [name] => car ) ) Here is the question: How do I get in one query all the information down the tree? I would like to have something like Array ( [Trip] => Array ( [id] => 6 [created] => 2010-05-04 00:23:59 [User] => Array ( [id] => 4 [name] => John Doe [email] => [email protected] ) [Start] => Array ( [id] => 2 [user_id] => 4 [Country] => Array ( [id] => 1 [name] = Spain ) [State] => Array ( [id] => 1 [name] = Barcelona ) [City] => Array ( [id] => 1 [name] = La Floresta ) [address] => Lincoln Street ) [End] => (same as Start) [title] => My trip [Transport] => Array ( [id] => 1 [name] => car ) ) ) Can CakePHP create this kind of data? Not only for $this->Model->find() but also for $this->paginate() as for example: // filter by start if(isset($this->passedArgs['start'])) { //debug('isset '.$this->passedArgs['start']); $start = $this->passedArgs['start']; $this->paginate['conditions'][] = array( 'OR' => array( 'Start.address LIKE' => "%$start%", 'Start.State.name LIKE' => "%$start%", 'Start.City.name LIKE' => "%$start%", 'Start.Country.name LIKE' => "%$start%" ) ); $this->data['Search']['start'] = $start; } It seems like a rough question but I am sure this is extensively done and documented, I'd really appreciate any help. Thanks Cheers Naoise

  Read the article

• Entity Framework with MySQL - Timeout Expired while Generating Model

  - by Nathan Taylor

  I've constructed a database in MySQL and I am attempting to map it out with Entity Framework, but I start running into "GenerateSSDLException"s whenever I try to add more than about 20 tables to the EF context. An exception of type 'Microsoft.Data.Entity.Design.VisualStudio.ModelWizard.Engine.ModelBuilderEngine+GenerateSSDLException' occurred while attempting to update from the database. The exception message is: 'An error occurred while executing the command definition. See the inner exception for details.' Fatal error encountered during command execution. Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding. There's nothing special about the affected tables, and it's never the same table(s), it's just that after a certain (unspecific) number of tables have been added, the context can no longer be updated without the "Timeout expired" error. Sometimes it's only one table left over, and sometimes it's three; results are pretty unpredictable. Furthermore, the variance in the number of tables which can be added before the error indicates to me that perhaps the problem lies in the size of the query being generated to update the context which includes both the existing table definitions, and also the new tables that are being added to it. Essentially, the SQL query is getting too large and it's failing to execute for some reason. If I generate the model with EdmGen2 it works without any errors, but the generated EDMX file cannot be updated within Visual Studio without producing the aforementioned exception. In all likelihood the source of this problem lies in the tool within Visual Studio given that EdmGen2 works fine, but I'm hoping that perhaps others could offer some advice on how to approach this very unique issue, because it seems like I'm not the only person experiencing it. One suggestion a colleague offered was maintaining two separate EBMX files with some table crossover, but that seems like a pretty ugly fix in my opinion. I suppose this is what I get for trying to use "new technology". :(

  Read the article

• Set focus on textbox in WPF from view model (C#) & wPF

  - by priyanka.sarkar

  I have a TextBox and a Button in my view. Now I am checking a condition upon button click and if the condition turns out to be false, displaying the message to the user, and then I have to set the cursor to the text box control. if (companyref == null) { Lipper.Nelson.AdminClient.Main.Views.ContactPanels.CompanyAssociation cs = new Lipper.Nelson.AdminClient.Main.Views.ContactPanels.CompanyAssociation(); MessageBox.Show("Company does not exist.", "Error", MessageBoxButton.OK, MessageBoxImage.Exclamation); cs.txtCompanyID.Focusable = true; System.Windows.Input.Keyboard.Focus(cs.txtCompanyID); } The above code is in the view model. The CompanyAssociation is the view name. But the cursor is not getting set in the TextBox. The xaml is as under <igEditors:XamTextEditor KeyDown="xamTextEditorAllowOnlyNumeric_KeyDown" Name="txtCompanyID" ValueChanged="txtCompanyID_ValueChanged" Text="{Binding Company.CompanyId, Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}" Width="{Binding ActualWidth, ElementName=border}" Grid.Column="1" Grid.Row="0" VerticalAlignment="Top" Margin="0,5,0,0" HorizontalAlignment="Stretch" IsEnabled="{Binding Path=IsEditable}" /> <Button Template="{StaticResource buttonTemp1}" Command="{Binding ContactCommand}" CommandParameter="searchCompany" Content="Search" Width="80" Grid.Column="2" Grid.Row="0" VerticalAlignment="Top" Margin="0" HorizontalAlignment="Left" IsEnabled="{Binding Path=IsEditable}" /> Please help

  Read the article

• How to clone a Model using Entity Framework and ASP.Net Mvc 2

  - by Picflight

  I have the following class: [MetadataType(typeof(PortalMetaData))] [System.Web.Mvc.Bind(Exclude = "PortalId")] public partial class Portal { public Portal() { this.Created = DateTime.Now; } } public class PortalMetaData { [Required(ErrorMessage = "Portal name is required")] [StringLength(50, ErrorMessage = "Portal name must be under 50 characters")] public object PortalName { get; set; } [Required(ErrorMessage = "Description is required")] public object Description { get; set; } } I have a corresponding Table in the database Portal I use the Portal table with a PortalController for the Site Admin to update the records in the Portal Table. I want another user with a different Role (AsstAdmin) to be able to update this table as well. To facilitate that I am thinking of creating a separate partial class that somehow links back to the Portal Model. This would allow me to display limited Fields for update by the AsstAdmin and I can display a different name for the Field as well. How can I accomplish this task? If I add the following class which inherits from Portal than I get an exception: Unable to cast object of type 'Project1.Mvc.Models.Portal' to type 'Prpject1.Mvc.Models.Site'. [MetadataType(typeof(SiteMetaData))] public class Site : Portal { public Site() { } } public class SiteMetaData { [Required(DisplayName = "Site Description")] public object Description { get; set; } }

  Read the article

• Cannot create list in SharePoint 2010 using Client Object Model

  - by Boris

  I am trying to utilize SharePoint 2010 Client Object Model to create a List based on a custom template. Here's my code: public void MakeList(string title, string listTemplateGUID, int localeIdentifier) { string message; string listUrl; List newList; Guid template; ListCreationInformation listInfo; Microsoft.SharePoint.Client.ListCollection lists; try { listUrl = title.Replace(spaceChar, string.Empty); template = GetListTemplate((uint)localeIdentifier, listTemplateGUID); listInfo = new ListCreationInformation(); listInfo.Url = listUrl; listInfo.Title = title; listInfo.Description = string.Empty; listInfo.TemplateFeatureId = template; listInfo.QuickLaunchOption = QuickLaunchOptions.On; clientContext.Load(site); clientContext.ExecuteQuery(); lists = site.Lists; clientContext.Load(lists); clientContext.ExecuteQuery(); newList = lists.Add(listInfo); clientContext.ExecuteQuery(); } catch (ServerException ex) { //... } } Now, this particular part, newList = lists.Add(listInfo); clientContext.ExecuteQuery(); the one that is supposed to create the actual list, throws an exception: Message: Cannot complete this action. Please try again. ServerErrorCode: 2130239231 ServerErrorTypeName: Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException Could anyone please help me realize what am I doing wrong? Thanks.

  Read the article

• Error handling in Rails Controller for adding embedded Mongoid documents to Model

  - by Dragonfly

  I have a Item model that has embedded documents. Currently, the following comments_controller code will add a comment to the item successfully. However, if pushing the comment document onto the comments array on item fails, I will not know this. #this does work, but i do not know if the push fails def create comment = Comment.new(:text => params[:text]) @item.comments << comment render :text => comment end I would like to have something like this, but @item.comments << comment does not return true or false: #this does not work def create comment = Comment.new(:text => params[:text]) if @item.comments << comment render :text => comment else render :text => 'oh no' end end Nor does it throw an exception when the document push fails: #this does not work def create begin comment = Comment.new(:text => params[:text]) @item.comments << comment render :text => comment rescue Exception => e render :text => 'oh no' end end Thanks!

  Read the article

• Objective-C memory model

  - by TofuBeer

  I am attempting to wrap my head around one part of the Objective-C memory model (specifically on the iPhone, so no GC). My background is C/C++/Java, and I am having an issue with the following bit of code (also wondering if I am doing this in an "Objective-C way" or not): - (NSSet *) retrieve { NSMutableSet *set; set = [NSMutableSet new]; // would normally fill the set in here with some data return ([set autorelease]); } - (void) test { NSSet *setA; NSSet *setB; setA = [self retrieve]; setB = [[self retrieve] retain]; [setA release]; [setB release]; } start EDIT Based on comments below, the updated retrieve method: - (NSSet *) retrieve { NSMutableSet *set; set = [[[NSMutableSet alloc] initWithCapacity:100] autorelease]; // would normally fill the set in here with some data return (set); } end EDIT The above code gives a warning for [setA release] "Incorrect decrement of the reference count of an object is not owned at this point by the caller". I though that the "new" set the reference count to 1. Then the "retain" call would add 1, and the "release" call would drop it by 1. Given that wouldn't setA have a reference count of 0 at the end and setB have a reference count of 1 at the end? From what I have figured out by trial and error, setB is correct, and there is no memory leak, but I'd like to understand why that is the case (what is wrong with my understanding of "new", "autorelease", "retain", and "release").

  Read the article

• How to prepopulate an Outlook MailItem and avoiding a com Exception from the object model guard

  - by torrente

  Hi, I work for a company that develops a CRM tool and offers integration with MS Office(2003 & 2007) from windows XP to 7. (I'm working using Win7) My task is to call an Outlook instance (using C#) from this CRM tool when the user wants to send an email and prepopulate with data of the CRM tool (email, recipient, etc..) All of this already works just fine. The problem I'm having is that Outlook's "object model guard" is throwing com Exception (Operation aborted (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80004004 (E_ABORT))) the moment I try to read a protected value from the mailItem (such as mail.bodyHTML). Example Snippet: using MSOutlook = Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook; //untrusted Instance _outlook = new MSOutlook.Application(); MSOutlook.MailItem mail = (MSOutlook.MailItem)_outlook.CreateItem(MSOutlook.OlItemType.olMailItem); //this where the Exception occurs string outlookStdHTMLBody = mail.HTMLBody; I've done quite a bit of reading and know that my Outlook Instance (derived by using new Application) is considered untrusted and therefore the "omg" kicks in. I do have a workaround for development: I'm running VS2010 as Administrator and if I run Outlook as Administrator as well - all is good. I suppose this is due to them having the same integrity levels(high) and the UAC(?) is not complaining. But that just ain't the way to go for deployment. Now the question is: Is there a way to obtain a trusted instance of Outlook so that I can avoid this exception? I've already read that when developing an Office Add-In using VSTO one can obtain a trusted Instance from the OnComplete event and/or using "ThisAddin" But I "merely" want to start an outlook instance and preopulate it, and do not want to develop an Add-In since this is not the requirement. And to make it clear - I have no problem with pop ups informing the user that outlook is being accessed - I just want to get rid of the exception! So how can I get around this problem using code? Any help is highly appreciated! Thomas

  Read the article

• Adapting existing HTML/Javascript model to Titanium's latest release (v 0.9)

  - by Alan Neal

  In pre-0.9 versions of Titanium, one could simply specify an .html file (local or remote) in the tiapp.xml file and interact with it in the same manner as one would on a website. As of version 0.9, that is no the longer case. One creates their entire app dynamically. Unfortunately, this broke my previous implementation and, other than an updated Kitchen Sink, much of the new model and API calls are not covered in the documentation (e.g., createLabel). So, my question is this... What are the simplest steps for re-creating the previous effect (knowingly forgoing some of the advantages of the Titanium's latest approach if necessary)? My previous implementation was exactly as it functions on the website. The website has a single index.html file with no content other than links to JavaScript and style files. The document body's onload event called the first JavaScript function (located in the main script) and, from that point forth, the entire content was dynamically created. How can I set up the latest version of Titanium so that I am poised to do the exact same thing? BTW: Whereas I previously had the choice to keep the files local or remote, I don't believe that remote access (e.g., simply using the webView widget to point to the website) is viable. That's because pages displayed via the webView do not have access to most of the API. Since the iPhone and Safari browsers do not support the file input type, the only means for uploading files (something my app requires) is calling Titanium's function. Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• How to implement two way binding between an ActiveX control and a WPF MVVM View Model

  - by Zamboni

  I have a WPF application implemented using the MVVM framework that uses an ActiveX control and I need to keep the WPF and ActiveX UI synchronised. So far I can update the ActiveX UI when I change the WPF UI using the code at the bottom of the question that I got from the article Hosting an ActiveX Control in WPF and this question. But I cannot update the WPF UI when I make a change in the ActiveX UI. I suspect that I need to fire the PropertyChanged event from my ActiveX control but I have no idea how to do this or if it is even possible. The ActiveX controls I have written are in VB6 and MFC as I am just prototying at this time for the eventual integration of VB6 ActiveX controls in a WPF contaner application. Here is a code snipet that indicates the work done so far: System.Windows.Forms.Integration.WindowsFormsHost host = new System.Windows.Forms.Integration.WindowsFormsHost(); // Create the ActiveX control. AxTEXTBOXActiveXLib.AxTEXTBOXActiveX axWmp = new AxTEXTBOXActiveXLib.AxTEXTBOXActiveX(); // Assign the ActiveX control as the host control's child. host.Child = axWmp; axWmp.DataBindings.Add(new System.Windows.Forms.Binding("ActiveXStatus", (MainWindowViewModel)this.DataContext, "ModelStatus", true, DataSourceUpdateMode.OnPropertyChanged )); // Add the interop host control to the Grid // control's collection of child controls. this.activexRow.Children.Add(host); How to implement two way binding between an ActiveX control and a WPF MVVM View Model?

  Read the article

• Cannot return view model after POST

  - by Interfector

  HI, I am trying to return a model after a POST but I receive the following error: Exception Details: System.InvalidOperationException: Operation is not valid due to the current state of the object. Line 29: public UsersModel getUser(Int32 id) { Line 30: return ( Line 31: from users in db.NUsers Line 32: join userSettings in db.NUsersSettings The code in the controller looks like this: [AcceptVerbs( HttpVerbs.Post )] public ActionResult Edit( NUsers user ) { //Other code that doesn't affect the error :) UsersModel userDetails = this.usersObj.getUser( user.UserID ); return View( userDetails ); } The getUser method looks like this: public UsersModel getUser(Int32 id) { return ( from users in db.NUsers join userSettings in db.NUsersSettings on users.UserID equals userSettings.UserID where users.UserID == id select new UsersModel { UserId = Convert.ToInt32( users.UserID ), Email = Convert.ToString( users.Email ), FirstName = Convert.ToString( users.FirstName ), LastName = Convert.ToString( users.LastName ), Language = Convert.ToString( userSettings.Language ), Phone = Convert.ToString( users.Phone ) } ).First(); } and finally the UsersModel if you think it is relevant: public class UsersModel { public int UserId; public string Email; public string FirstName; public string LastName; public string Language; public string Phone; public List<NLanguages> Languages; public UsersModel() { Models.Languages languagesObj = new Models.Languages(); Languages = languagesObj.getLanguages(); } } Any thoughts on what might be causing the error and what can I do to fix it? Thx

  Read the article

• Magento resource model for table with compound primary key

  - by sdek

  I am creating a custom module for a Magento ecommerce site, and the module will center around a new (ie, custom) table that has a compound/composite primary key, or rather the table has two columns that make up the primary key. Does anybody know how to create your models/resource models based on a table with a compound key? To give a few more details, I have looked up several tutorials and also used the excellent moduleCreator script. But it seems like all the tutorials revolve around the table having a PK with just one column in it. Something like this: class <Namespace>_<Module>_Model_Mysql4_<Module> extends Mage_Core_Model_Mysql4_Abstract { public function _construct(){ $this->_init('<module_alias>/<table_alias>', '<table_primary_key_id>'); } } Also, I just noticed that looking at the database model almost all tables have a single primary key. I understand this has much to do with the EAV-style db structure, but still is it possible to use a table with a compound PK? I want to stick with the Magento framework/conventions if possible. Is it discouraged? Should I just change the structure of my custom table to have some dummy id column? I do have the ability to do that, but geez! (Another side note that I thought I would mention is that it looks like the Zend Framework provides a way to base a class on a table with compound primary key (see Example #20 on this page - about half-way down), so it seems that the Magento framework should also provide for it... I just don't see how.)

  Read the article

• Rails Polymorphic Association with multiple associations on the same model

  - by Matt Rogish

  My question is essentially the same as this one: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1168047/polymorphic-association-with-multiple-associations-on-the-same-model However, the proposed/accepted solution does not work, as illustrated by a commenter later. I have a Photo class that is used all over my app. A post can have a single photo. However, I want to re-use the polymorphic relationship to add a secondary photo. Before: class Photo belongs_to :attachable, :polymorphic => true end class Post has_one :photo, :as => :attachable, :dependent => :destroy end Desired: class Photo belongs_to :attachable, :polymorphic => true end class Post has_one :photo, :as => :attachable, :dependent => :destroy has_one :secondary_photo, :as => :attachable, :dependent => :destroy end However, this fails as it cannot find the class "SecondaryPhoto". Based on what I could tell from that other thread, I'd want to do: has_one :secondary_photo, :as => :attachable, :class_name => "Photo", :dependent => :destroy Except calling Post#secondary_photo simply returns the same photo that is attached via the Photo association, e.g. Post#photo === Post#secondary_photo. Looking at the SQL, it does WHERE type = "Photo" instead of, say, "SecondaryPhoto" as I'd like... Thoughts? Thanks!

  Read the article

• Sweave/R - Automatically generating an appendix that contains all the model summaries/plots/data pro

  - by John Horton

  I like the idea of making research available at multiple levels of detail i.e., abstract for the casually curious, full text for the more interested, and finally the data and code for those working in the same area/trying to reproduce your results. In between the actual text and the data/code level, I'd like to insert another layer. Namely, I'd like to create a kind of automatically generated appendix that contains the full regression output, diagnostic plots, exploratory graphs data profiles etc. from the analysis, regardless of whether those plots/regressions etc. made it into the final paper. One idea I had was to write a script that would examine the .Rnw file and automatically: Profile all data sets that are loaded (sort of like the Hmisc(?) package) Summarize all regressions - i.e., run summary(model) for all models Present all plots (regardless of whether they made it in the final version) The idea is to make this kind of a low-effort, push-button sort of thing as opposed to a formal appendix written like the rest of a paper. What I'm looking for is some ideas on how to do this in R in a relatively simple way. My hunch is that there is some way of going through the namespace, figuring out what something is and then dumping into a PDF. Thoughts? Does something like this already exist?

  Read the article

• Rails model relations depending on count of nested relations

  - by Lowgain

  I am putting together a messaging system for a rails app I am working on. I am building it in a similar fashion to facebook's system, so messages are grouped into threads, etc. My related models are: MsgThread - main container of a thread Message - each message/reply in thread Recipience - ties to user to define which users should subscribe to this thread Read - determines whether or not a user has read a specific message My relationships look like class User < ActiveRecord::Base #stuff... has_many :msg_threads, :foreign_key => 'originator_id' #threads the user has started has_many :recipiences has_many :subscribed_threads, :through => :recipiences, :source => :msg_thread #threads the user is subscribed to end class MsgThread < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :messages has_many :recipiences belongs_to :originator, :class_name => "User", :foreign_key => "originator_id" end class Recipience < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :user belongs_to :msg_thread end class Message < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :msg_thread belongs_to :author, :class_name => "User", :foreign_key => "author_id" end class Read < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :user belongs_to :message end I'd like to create a new selector in the user sort of like: has_many :updated_threads, :through => :recipiencies, :source => :msg_thread, :conditions => {THREAD CONTAINS MESSAGES WHICH ARE UNREAD (have no 'read' models tying a user to a message)} I was thinking of either writing a long condition with multiple joins, or possibly writing giving the model an updated_threads method to return this, but I'd like to see if there is an easier way first. Any ideas? Also, if there is something fundamentally wrong with my structure for this functionality let me know! Thanks!!

  Read the article

• Mimic remote API or extend existing django model

  - by drozzy

  I am in a process of designing a client for a REST-ful web-service. What is the best way to go about representing the remote resource locally in my django application? For example if the API exposes resources such as: List of Cars Car Detail Car Search Dealership summary So far I have thought of two different approaches to take: Try to wrangle the django's models.Model to mimic the native feel of it. So I could try to get some class called Car to have methods like Car.objects.all() and such. This kind of breaks down on Car Search resources. Implement a Data Access Layer class, with custom methods like: Car.get_all() Car.get(id) CarSearch.search("blah") So I will be creating some custom looking classes. Has anyone encoutered a similar problem? Perhaps working with some external API's (i.e. twitter?) Any advice is welcome. PS: Please let me know if some part of question is confusing, as I had trouble putting it in precise terms.

  Read the article

• MVC Localization of Default Model Binder

  - by Dai Bok

  Hi, I am currently trying to figure out how to localize the error messages generated by MVC. Let me use the default model binder as an example, so I can explain the problem. Assuming I have a form, where a user enters thier age. The user then enters "ten" in to the form, but instead of getting the expected error of "Age must be beween 18 and 25." the message "The value 'ten' is not valid for Age." is displayed. The entity's age property is defined below: [Range(18, 25, ErrorMessageResourceType = typeof (Errors), ErrorMessageResourceName = "Age", ErrorMessage = "Range_ErrorMessage")] public int Age { get; set; } After some digging, I notice that this error text comes from the System.Web.Mvc.Resources.DefaultModelBinder_ValueInvalid in the MvcResources.resx file. Now, how can create localized versions of this file? As A solution, for example, should I download MVC source and add MvcResources.en_GB.resx, MvcResources.fr_FR.resx, MvcResources.es_ES.resx and MvcResources.de_DE.resx, and then compile my own version of MVC.dll? But I don't like this idea. Any one else know a better way?

  Read the article

• .Net Architecture challenge: The Change-prone Frankestein Model

  - by SDReyes

  Good Morning SO! We've been scratching our heads with with this interesting scenario at the office, and we're anxious to hear your ideas and approaches: We have a database, whose schema is prone to changes -lets call it Prony-. (is used to store configuration parameters for embedded devices. so if the embedded devices guy need a new table, property or relationship for the model, he should be able to adapt the schema in a easy way -happens so often- ). Prony needs a web interface to create/edit its data. We have another database containing data that also need to be loaded to the devices, after making some transformations - lets call this one Oddy- (this data it's generated by an already existent administrative web application). Finally we have Tracy, a server that communicates our DBs and our embedded devices. She should to auto-adapt herself, to our dbs schema changes and serialize the data to the devices. Nice puzzle, don't think so? : ) Our current candidates: Rady: The fast Lets create some views in Prony that make the data transformation from Oddy. then use DynamicData (or some RAD tool) to create/update a simple web interface for Prony (so he can even consult the transformated data from coming from Prony : ). About Tracy, she will need to be recompiled to update her DB schema (Entity framework should work) and use Reflection to explore recursively the schema and serialize data. Cons: We would have to recompile Tracy and the Prony's web interface. What do you think of the candidate(s)? What would you do?

  Read the article

• Error while uploading file method in Client Object Model Sharepoint 2010

  - by user1481570

  Error while uploading file method in Client Object Model + Sharepoint 2010. Once the file got uploaded. After that though the code compiles with no error I get the error while executing "{"Value does not fall within the expected range."} {System.Collections.Generic.SynchronizedReadOnlyCollection} I have a method which takes care of functionality to upload files /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// public void Upload_Click(string documentPath, byte[] documentStream) { String sharePointSite = "http://cvgwinbasd003:28838/sites/test04"; String documentLibraryUrl = sharePointSite +"/"+ documentPath.Replace('\\','/'); //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //Get Document List List documentsList = clientContext.Web.Lists.GetByTitle("Doc1"); var fileCreationInformation = new FileCreationInformation(); //Assign to content byte[] i.e. documentStream fileCreationInformation.Content = documentStream; //Allow owerwrite of document fileCreationInformation.Overwrite = true; //Upload URL fileCreationInformation.Url = documentLibraryUrl; Microsoft.SharePoint.Client.File uploadFile = documentsList.RootFolder.Files.Add( fileCreationInformation); //uploadFile.ListItemAllFields.Update(); clientContext.ExecuteQuery(); } ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// In the MVC 3.0 application in the controller I have defined the following method to invoke the upload method. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// public ActionResult ProcessSubmit(IEnumerable<HttpPostedFileBase> attachments) { System.IO.Stream uploadFileStream=null; byte[] uploadFileBytes; int fileLength=0; foreach (HttpPostedFileBase fileUpload in attachments) { uploadFileStream = fileUpload.InputStream; fileLength=fileUpload.ContentLength; } uploadFileBytes= new byte[fileLength]; uploadFileStream.Read(uploadFileBytes, 0, fileLength); using (DocManagementService.DocMgmtClient doc = new DocMgmtClient()) { doc.Upload_Click("Doc1/Doc2/Doc2.1/", uploadFileBytes); } return RedirectToAction("SyncUploadResult"); } ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Please help me to locate the error

  Read the article

• Bi-directional view model syncing with "live" collections and properties (MVVM)

  - by Schneider

  I am getting my knickers in a twist recently about View Models (VM). Just like this guy I have come to the conclusion that the collections I need to expose on my VM typically contain a different type to the collections exposed on my business objects. Hence there must be a bi-directional mapping or transformation between these two types. (Just to complicate things, on my project this data is "Live" such that as soon as you change a property it gets transmitted to other computers) I can just about cope with that concept, using a framework like Truss, although I suspect there will be a nasty surprise somewhere within. Not only must objects be transformed but a synchronization between these two collections is required. (Just to complicate things I can think of cases where the VM collection might be a subset or union of business object collections, not simply a 1:1 synchronization). I can see how to do a one-way "live" sync, using a replicating ObservableCollection or something like CLINQ. The problem then becomes: What is the best way to create/delete items? Bi-directinal sync does not seem to be on the cards - I have found no such examples, and the only class that supports anything remotely like that is the ListCollectionView. Would bi-directional sync even be a sensible way to add back into the business object collection? All the samples I have seen never seem to tackle anything this "complex". So my question is: How do you solve this? Is there some technique to update the model collections from the VM? What is the best general approach to this?

  Read the article

• Association and model data saving problem

  - by Zhlobopotam

  Developing with cakephp 1.3 (latest from github). There are 2 models bind with hasAndBelongsToMany: documents and tags. Document can have many tags in other words. I've add a new document submitting form there user can enter a list of tags separated with commas (new tag will be added, if not exist already). I looked at cakephp bakery 2.0 source code on github and found the solution. But it seems that something is wrong. class Document extends AppModel { public $hasAndBelongsToMany = array('Tag'); public function beforeSave($options = array()) { if (isset($this->data[$this->alias]['tags']) && !empty($this- >data[$this->alias]['tags'])) { $tagIds = $this->Tag->saveDocTags($this->data[$this->alias] ['tags']); unset($this->data[$this->alias]['tags']); $this->data[$this->Tag->alias][$this->Tag->alias] = $tagIds; } return true; } } class Tag extends AppModel { public $hasAndBelongsToMany = array ('Document'); public function saveDocTags($commalist = '') { if ($commalist == '') return null; $tags = explode(',',$commalist); if (empty($tags)) return null; $existing = $this->find('all', array( 'conditions' => array('title' => $tags) )); $return = Set::extract($existing,'/Tag/id'); if (sizeof($existing) == sizeof($tags)) { return $return; } $existing = Set::extract($existing,'/Tag/title'); foreach ($tags as $tag) { if (!in_array($tag, $existing)) { $this->create(array('title' => $tag)); $this->save(); $return[] = $this->id; } } return $return; } } So, new tags creation works well but document model can't save association data and tells: SQL Error: 1054: Unknown column 'Array' in 'field list' Query: INSERT INTO documents (title, content, shortnfo, date, status) VALUES ('Document with tags', '', '', Array, 1) Any ideas how to solve this problem?

  Read the article

• set a default saving data in a selection box in HABTM model

  - by vincent low

  here is my problem which in my system. my system allow user to add event, which include date, time, places. In the other hand, user are allow to choose the "Event sharing to" some of other user. So i successful to created and share to other user, when the user login which are being choose to share with the event, he is able to view for that particular event. But the problem is, when user add the event, he must choose for his own name also in the select box. If not he will be unable to read the event that he had created. So i need to save a default data to my model, which is whenever the user got choose the sharing event or not, it also will save the data to his user id. here is my code for select box, what can i edit and do to let it set a default saving value which is always save with the user own data?? input('User',array( 'label' = 'Select Related Potential', 'options' = $users, //'id'='user', 'style'='width:250px;height:100px', //'selected' = $ownUserId )); ? i try to solve by adding 1 more row to the add.ctp, but the permission just set to the own user who created it, the other user i choose is unable to read. $form-input('User',array( 'label' = 'Select Related Potential', 'options' = $users, //'id'='user', 'style'='width:250px;height:100px', 'selected' = $ownUserId )); $form-input('User',array('type'='hidden','value'=$ownUserId));

  Read the article

• Problem with Railscast #197 - Nested Model Form Part 2

  - by sscirrus

  I'm trying to implement Ryan's Railscast #197 in a system with Questions, Answers, and (multiple choice) Options. http://railscasts.com/episodes/197-nested-model-form-part-2. I have successfully implemented the nesting among these forms/partials. The simpler 'check box' way to delete records works properly. The problem occurs when I try to add/delete records. I have copied the code exactly as it appears in his Railscast: #new.html.erb <%= javascript_include_tag :defaults, :cache => true %> <% f.fields_for :in_options do |builder| %> <%= render "option_fields", :f => builder %> <% end %> #_option_fields.html.erb partial <%= f.hidden_field :_destroy %> <%= link_to_function "remove", "remove_fields(this)" %> #application_helper.rb (exact same as #197) def link_to_remove_fields(name, f) f.hidden_field(:_destroy) + link_to_function(name, "remove_fields(this)") end def link_to_add_fields(name, f, association) new_object = f.object.class.reflect_on_association(association).klass.new fields = f.fields_for(association, new_object, :child_index => "new_#{association}") do |builder| render(association.to_s.singularize + "_fields", :f => builder) end link_to_function(name, h("add_fields(this, \"#{association}\", \"#{escape_javascript(fields)}\")")) end #application.js (exact same as #197. I have an Event.addbehavior below this code.) function remove_fields(link) { $(link).previous("input[type=hidden]").value = "1"; $(link).up(".fields").hide(); } function add_fields(link, association, content) { var new_id = new Date().getTime(); var regexp = new RegExp("new_" + association, "g") $(link).up().insert({ before: content.replace(regexp, new_id) }); } 2 problems: When I click on the 'remove' link it doesn't remove - it just shifts the page up or down. When I include link_to_add_fields "Add Answer", f, :answers, I get undefined method `klass' for nil:NilClass. Thanks everyone.

  Read the article

• Active Record two belongs_to calls to the same model

  - by ethyreal

  In linking a sports event to two teams, at first this seemed to make since: events - id:integer - integer:home_team_id - integer:away_team_id teams - integer:id - string:name However I am troubled by how I would link that up in the active record model: class Event belongs_to :home_team, :class_name => 'Team', :foreign_key => "home_team_id" belongs_to :away_team, :class_name => 'Team', :foreign_key => "away_team_id" end Is that the best solution? In an answer to a similar question I was pointed to single table inheritance, and then later found polymorphic associations. Neither of which seemed to fit this association. Perhaps I am looking at this wrong, but I see no need to subclass a team into home and away teams since the distinction is only in where the game is played. I thought also about a has_many through association but that seems two much as I will only ever need two teams, but those two teams don't belong to any one event. event_teams - integer:event_id - integer:team_id - boolean:is_home Is there a cleaner more semantic way for making these associations in active record? Thanks

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70  | Next Page >