Search Results

Search found 10170 results on 407 pages for 'regression testing'.

Page 63/407 | < Previous Page | 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70  | Next Page >

• Watin testing of FckEditor

  - by Iyyengar

  I have been working on the integration testing of a webapp using watin. The webapp uses fckeditor as one of the richtext controls. Here is the piece of html of the viewsource of my webapp that includes fckeditor iframe id="ctl00_HeaderMain_txtSafetyNetDescription___Frame" src="/FCKEditor/editor/fckeditor.html?InstanceName=ctl00_HeaderMain_txtSafetyNetDescription&Toolbar=myApp" width="100%" height="200px" frameborder="no" scrolling="no" /iframe By using the watin script ... i am able to get the frame object with the following code. Frame frame = ie.Frame(Find.ById("ctl00_HeaderMain_txtSafetyNetDescription___Frame")) ; Now I want to write some text to the fckeditor. But i am not sure how to write to the fckeditor as it is a frame -- can someone help me on this. Thanks. Iyyengar.

  Read the article

• Thread testing for time

  - by DanielFH

  Hi there :) I'm making a thread for my application that's going to do an exit operation at a given time (only hours and minutes, day/month doesn't matter). Is this the right way to do it, and also the right way to test for time? I'm testing for a 24 hour clock by the way, not AM / PM. I'm then in another class going to call this something like new Thread(new ExitThread()).start(); public class ExitThread implements Runnable { @Override public void run() { Date date = new Date(System.currentTimeMillis()); String time = new SimpleDateFormat("HHmmss").format(date); int currentTime = Integer.parseInt(time); int exitTime = 233000; while(true) { try { Thread.sleep(10000); } catch (InterruptedException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } if(currentTime >= exitTime ) { // do exit operation here } } } Thanks. //D

  Read the article

• Good tool to test WCF service (not SOAP/HTTP webservice)

  - by Kangkan

  I recently found SOAPUI and discovered that it is just a great tool for testing any SOAP/HTTP service. Conventionally, we have been developing our own driver to test our services (WCF based netTCP binding) so far. But with SOAPUI experience, I am really looking for some such tool that can be used with such ease with built-in facilities for load testing, functional testing etc. The other thought in my mind is that for services that I wish to deploy with netTCP can be first tested using a HTTP binding using SOAPUI. Once found suitable, the binding can be changed for the intended one. I shall like the views from all the experts here. Thanks.

  Read the article

• Enabling depth testing when using CAOpenGLLayer

  - by Andrew

  If one is using a subclass of NSOpenGLView then one enables depth testing by selecting a 16/24/32 bit buffer from the attributes menu in Xcode, and then adding glEnable(GL_DEPTH_TEST); glClear(GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT); to the drawRect method. However, in the application I'm creating I'm rendering OpenGL content via the drawInCGLContext method of a CAOpenGLLayer which is contained within a subclass of NSView. This means that it is no longer possible to create a depth buffer via the inspector. Does anyone know how I can achieve this in such a situation?

  Read the article

• Testing for the existence of a field in a class

  - by Brett

  Hi, i have a quick question. I have a 2D array that stores an instance of a class. The elements of the array are assigned a particular class based on a text file that is read earlier in the program. Since i do not know without looking in the file what class is stored at a particular element i could refer to a field that doesn't exist at that index (referring to appearance when an instance of temp is stored in that index). i have come up with a method of testing this, but it is long winded and requires a second matrix. Is there a function to test for the existence of a field in a class? class temp(): name = "default" class temp1(): appearance = "@"

  Read the article

• Unittest and mock

  - by user1410756

  I'm testing with unittest in python and it's ok. Now, I have introduced mock and I need to resolve a question. This is my code: from mock import Mock import unittest class Matematica(object): def __init__(self, op1, op2): self.op1 = op1 self.op2 = op2 def adder(self): return self.op1 + self.op2 def subs(self): return abs(self.op1 - self.op2) def molt(self): return self.op1 * self.op2 def divid(self): return self.op1 / self.op2 class TestMatematica(unittest.TestCase): """Test della classe Matematica""" def testing(self): """Somma""" mat = Matematica(10,20) self.assertEqual(mat.adder(),30) """Sottrazione""" self.assertEqual(mat.subs(),10) class test_mock(object): def __init__(self, matematica): self.matematica = matematica def execute(self): self.matematica.adder() self.matematica.adder() self.matematica.subs() if __name__ == "__main__": result = unittest.TextTestRunner(verbosity=2).run(TestMatematica('testing')) a = Matematica(10,20) b = test_mock(a) b.execute() mock_foo = Mock(b.execute)#return_value = 'rafa') mock_foo() print mock_foo.called print mock_foo.call_count print mock_foo.method_calls This code is functionally and result of print is: True, 1, [] . Now, I need to count how many times are called self.matematica.adder() and self.matematica.subs() . THANKS

  Read the article

• Performance testing on .xap files...

  - by Radhi

  Hi All, I want to know that can i use profiler to do performance testing of .xap files. if you have any articles for the same topic please provide it to me. and if there are any other tools available to do this please tell me. in my project we have to check that when we logged into the Silverlight 4 .0 application. the screen takes 5 seconds to load. so i have to check which method is taking time to do this. in our project there are services which calls other services too,, and we have used CAL. so need to identify the bottleneck... please help...

  Read the article

• Does isolation frameworks (Moq, RhinoMock, etc) lead to test overspecification?

  - by Marius

  In Osherove's great book "The Art of Unit Testing" one of the test anti-patterns is over-specification which is basically the same as testing the internal state of the object instead of some expected output. To my experience, using Isolation frameworks can cause the same unwanted side effects as testing internal behavior because one tends to only implement the behavior necessary to make your stub interact with the object under test. Now if your implementation changes later on (but the contract remains the same), your test will suddenly break because you are expecting some data from the stub which was not implemented. So what do you think is the best approach to counter this? 1) Implement your stubs/mocks fully, this has the negative side-effect of potentially making your test less readable and also specifying more than necessary to make your test pass. 2) Favor manual, fully implemented fakes. 3) Implement your stubs/fakes so that they make your test just pass, and then deal with the brittleness that this might introduce.

  Read the article

• Interview Question: .Any() vs if (.Length > 0) for testing if a collection has elements

  - by Chris

  In a recent interview I was asked what the difference between .Any() and .Length > 0 was and why I would use either when testing to see if a collection had elements. This threw me a little as it seems a little obvious but feel I may be missing something. I suggested that you use .Length when you simply need to know that a collection has elements and .Any() when you wish to filter the results. Presumably .Any() takes a performance hit too as it has to do a loop / query internally.

  Read the article

• Multiple arrangements/asserts per unit test?

  - by lance

  A group of us (.NET developers) are talking unit testing. Not any one framework (we've hit on MSpec, NUint, MSTest, RhinoMocks, TypeMock, etc) -- we're just talking generally. We see lots of syntax that forces a distinct unit test per scenario, but we don't see an avenue to re-using one unit test with various inputs or scenarios. Also, we don't see an avenue to multiple asserts in a given test without an early assert's failure threatening the testing of later asserts (in the same test). Is there anything like that happening in .NET unit testing (state- or behavior-based) today?

  Read the article

• What's a unit test? [closed]

  - by Tyler

  Possible Duplicates: What is unit testing and how do you do it? What is unit testing? I recognize that to 95% of you, this is a very WTF question. So. What's a unit test? I understand that essentially you're attempting to isolate atomic functionality but how do you test for that? When is it necessary? When is it ridiculous? Can you give an example? (Preferably in C? I mostly hear about it from Java devs on this site so maybe this is specific to Object Oriented languages? I really don't know.) I know many programmers swear by unit testing religiously. What's it all about? EDIT: Also, what's the ratio of time you typically spend writing unit tests to time spent writing new code?

  Read the article

• Python unittest with expensive setup

  - by Staale

  My test file is basically: class Test(unittest.TestCase): def testOk(): pass if __name__ == "__main__": expensiveSetup() try: unittest.main() finally: cleanUp() However, I do wish to run my test through Netbeans testing tools, and to do that I need unittests that don't rely on an environment setup done in main. Looking at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/402483/caching-result-of-setup-using-python-unittest - it recommends using Nose. However, I don't think Netbeans supports this. I didn't find any information indicating that it does. Additionally, I am the only one here actually writing tests, so I don't want to introduce additional dependencies for the other 2 developers unless they are needed. How can I do the setup and cleanup once for all the tests in my TestSuite? The expensive setup here is creating some files with dummy data, as well as setting up and tearing down a simple xml-rpc server. I also have 2 test classes, one testing locally and one testing all methods over xml-rpc.

  Read the article

• testing an in app purchase??

  - by hemant

  i developed a application with in app purchases..when user buys the subscription it gets stored on my server..after testing it few times i deleted the data from server to test it again but when i buy it the sandbox environment says u you already purchased this.TAP OK to download it again for free also i have used this test account on my previous application?? does it means i will have to create a new test account for this application?? also by mistake i used this account on apple store..i read somewhere that doing this will make your test account invalid...is it true?? should i create a new account for it??

  Read the article

• Test plans and how best to write them

  - by Karim

  We're trying to figure out the best way to write tests in our test plan. Specifically, when writing a test that is meant to be used by anyone including QA staff, should the steps in the test be very specific or more broad giving the tester more leeway in how the task can be accomplished. As a very simple example, if you're testing opening a document in word processing document, should the test read: Using the mouse, open the file menu Choose "Open File..." in the file menu In the open file dialog that appears, navigate to x and double-click the document called y OR Bring up the file open dialog Open the file y Now I realize one answer is probably going to be "it depends on what you're trying to test" but I'm trying to answer a broader question here: If the test steps are too specific do we risk a) making the testing process to laborious and tedious and more importantly b) do we risk missing something because we wrote down too specific a path to achieve a goal. Alternatively, if we make it broad do we depend too much on the whims of the tester at the time and lose crucial testing of paths that are more common to customers/clients?

  Read the article

• Grails Services / Transactions / RuntimeException / Testing

  - by Rob

  I'm testing come code in a service with transactional set to true , which talks to a customer supplied web service the main part of which looks like class BarcodeService { .. /// some stuff ... try{ cancelBarCodeResponse = cancelBarCode(cancelBarcodeRequest) } catch(myCommsException e) { throw new RuntimeException(e) } ... where myCommsException extends Exception .. I have a test which looks like // As no connection from my machine, it should fail .. shouldFailWithCause(RuntimeException){ barcodeServices.cancelBarcodeDetails() } The test fails cause it's catching a myCommsException rather than the RuntimeException i thought i'd converted it to .. Anyone care to point out what i'm doing wrong ? Also will the fact that it's not a RuntimeException mean any transaction related info done before my try/catch actually be written out rather than thrown away ?? Thanks

  Read the article

• Simple performance testing tool in C#?

  - by Tomas

  Hi, At first -I need to do it as my university project so I am not interested in using existing tools. I would like to know whether it is even possible to write a very simple tool that I could use for performance testing of web applications. It would only record actions (I do not know, maybe just packet sniffering?) and then replay. However I have basic idea (record packets on port 80 and sending them again), I do not know how to measure time for each transaction as they are not differentiated. Any help is greatly appreciated, thank you!

  Read the article

• What to use to write tests? [Rails]

  - by yuval

  I asked a question about different testing frameworks yesterday. This question can be found here. Now that I have a better understanding of the different frameworks, I have a very simple question: With a basic understanding, but very limited experience with writing tests with rails' built in testing framework (basic assertions), would it be okay for me to jump directly to testing with RSpec, Webrat, and Cucamber? Thank you! As a side note: yes, this is an opinion based question, but I feel that the input received to this question is valuable enough to the community to keep this question open. Thanks.

  Read the article

• Selenium testing with checksums (md5)

  - by Peter

  I am new at selenium testing and am writing a bunch of tests for a webpage that relies heavily on javascript user interaction. At first I wrote a lot of assertions of the style If I press button A" then assert number of visible rows = x, assert checkboxes checked are such assert title = bar .... [20 more] and so on. Then I switched to checksumming the HTML using MD5: If I press button A" then assert md5(html) = 8548bccac94e35d9836f1fec0da8115c. And it made my life a whole lot easier... But is this a bad practice in any way?

  Read the article

• C#: How to unit test a method that relies on another method within the same class?

  - by michael paul

  I have a class similar to the following: public class MyProxy : ClientBase<IService>, IService { public MyProxy(String endpointConfiguration) : base(endpointConfiguration) { } public int DoSomething(int x) { int result = DoSomethingToX(x); //This passes unit testing int result2 = ((IService)this).DoWork(x) //do I have to extract this part into a separate method just //to test it even though it's only a couple of lines? //Do something on result2 int result3 = result2 ... return result3; } int IService.DoWork(int x) { return base.Channel.DoWork(x); } } The problem lies in the fact that when testing I don't know how to mock the result2 item without extracting the part that gets result3 using result2 into a separate method. And, because it is unit testing I don't want to go that deep as to test what result2 comes back as... I'd rather mock the data somehow... like, be able to call the function and replace just that one call.

  Read the article

• Tests that are 2-3 times bigger than the testable code

  - by HeavyWave

  Is it normal to have tests that are way bigger than the actual code being tested? For every line of code I am testing I usually have 2-3 lines in the unit test. Which ultimately leads to tons of time being spent just typing the tests in (mock, mock and mock more). Where are the time savings? Do you ever avoid tests for code that is along the lines of being trivial? Most of my methods are less than 10 lines long and testing each one of them takes a lot of time, to the point where, as you see, I start questioning writing most of the tests in the first place. I am not advocating not unit testing, I like it. Just want to see what factors people consider before writing tests. They come at a cost (in terms of time, hence money), so this cost must be evaluated somehow. How do you estimate the savings created by your unit tests, if ever?

  Read the article

• Perfmon: which counter identifies that threads are waiting?

  - by frankadelic

  While load testing an ASP.NET app, we find that the pages are taking 20-30 sec under heavy load. We suspect this is because the pages are waiting for database calls or web services. Is there a particular perfmon counter that can identify this sort of bottleneck on the web servers? CPU, Memory, and Disk are normal. Or must we use a tool other than perfmon to track down this bottleneck?

  Read the article

• How to: mirror a staging server from a production server

  - by Zombies

  We want to mirror our current production app server (Oracle Application Server) onto our staging server. As it stands right now, various things are out of sync, and what may work in testing/QA can easily fail in production because of settings/patch/etc inconsistencies. I was thinking what would be best is to clone the entire disk daily and push it onto the staging server... Would this be the best method...? (note: these are all windows servers)

  Read the article

• Generate a limited amount of random network traffic between 2 hosts

  - by Andrew S

  I'm trying to find a utility that will allow me to generate a constant flow of random network traffic at a specified rate between 2 hosts. The utility needs to run on Windows and OSX. I've tried iperf but it seems to be more oriented toward short-term testing/statistics and it really taxes the CPU even at slower rates. I want something that will generate traffic for a few weeks at say 10Mbps while I use other tools to monitor the impact of that level of traffic on the network.

  Read the article

• Testing smart card minidriver

  - by user352792

  when testing smart card minidriver in windows 7, got the following errors: "cmck exec Reconnect" always show that Testing through CAPI calls Submitting CSP PIN for reader \.\DMWZ ESAFE 0\ CryptAcquireContext - CRYPT_NEWKEYSET CryptGenKey Reconnecting CryptAcquireContext - CRYPT_DELETEKEYSET CryptAcquireContext failed unexpectedly d:\5429t\testsrc\dstest\security\core\credentials\smartcard\cmck\cmck\fnreconnect.cpp Line: 264 WIN32 0x80090016 Keyset does not exist. in windows xp, it always passed. i have no idea! this is my log. in XP: /* P:608 T:3380 8-30-203 CardAcquireContext(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 8-30-203 CardAcquireContext(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-30-203 CardAcquireContext(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 8-30-203 CardAcquireContext(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-750 CardAcquireContext(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-765 CardAcquireContext(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-765 CardDeleteContext(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-765 CardDeleteContext(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-765 CardAcquireContext(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-765 CardAcquireContext(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-765 CardDeleteContext(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-781 CardDeleteContext(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-781 CardAcquireContext(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-781 CardAcquireContext(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-781 CardGetChallenge(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardGetChallenge(): Challenge = CE568537C1BC9318 / / P:608 T:3380 8-31-781 CardGetChallenge(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-796 CardAuthenticateChallenge(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardAuthenticateChallenge(): Response = B99E85F50E1F5C29 / / P:608 T:3380 8-31-796 CardAuthenticateChallenge(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-812 CardDeauthenticate(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-812 CardDeauthenticate(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-812 CardAuthenticatePin(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardAuthenticatePin(): User PIN = 0000 / / P:608 T:3380 8-31-828 CardAuthenticatePin(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-828 CardDeauthenticate(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-843 CardDeauthenticate(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-843 CardDeleteContext(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-843 CardDeleteContext(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-859 CardAcquireContext(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-859 CardAcquireContext(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-859 CardAuthenticatePin(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardAuthenticatePin(): User PIN = 0000 / / P:608 T:3380 8-31-875 CardAuthenticatePin(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-875 CardQueryCapabilities(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-875 CardQueryCapabilities(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-890 CardAuthenticatePin(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardAuthenticatePin(): User PIN = 0000 / / P:608 T:3380 8-31-906 CardAuthenticatePin(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-906 CardDeauthenticate(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-921 CardDeauthenticate(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-921 CardDeleteContext(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 8-31-921 CardDeleteContext(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-32-0 CardAcquireContext(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 8-32-0 CardAcquireContext(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-32-0 CardReadFile(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardReadFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardid / / P:608 T:3380 CardReadFile(): cardid = 34646533393531342D643465662D3432 / / P:608 T:3380 8-32-46 CardReadFile(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-32-62 CardReadFile(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardReadFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardcf / / P:608 T:3380 CardReadFile(): cardcf = 000000000000 / / P:608 T:3380 8-32-109 CardReadFile(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-32-109 CardReadFile(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardReadFile(): Dir Name = mscp, File Name = cmapfile / / P:608 T:3380 8-32-187 CardReadFile(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardReadFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardcf / / P:608 T:3380 CardReadFile(): cardcf = 000000000000 / / P:608 T:3380 8-32-234 CardReadFile(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-32-250 CardAuthenticatePin(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardAuthenticatePin(): User PIN = 0000 / / P:608 T:3380 8-32-265 CardAuthenticatePin(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-32-265 CardDeauthenticate(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 8-32-281 CardDeauthenticate(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-32-281 CardReadFile(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardReadFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardcf / / P:608 T:3380 CardReadFile(): cardcf = 000000000000 / / P:608 T:3380 8-32-328 CardReadFile(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-32-343 CardQueryFreeSpace(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 8-32-359 CardQueryFreeSpace(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-32-375 CardReadFile(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardReadFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardcf / / P:608 T:3380 CardReadFile(): cardcf = 000000000000 / / P:608 T:3380 8-32-421 CardReadFile(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-32-421 CardAuthenticatePin(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardAuthenticatePin(): User PIN = 0000 / / P:608 T:3380 8-32-453 CardAuthenticatePin(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-32-453 CardWriteFile(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardWriteFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardcf / / P:608 T:3380 CardWriteFile(): cardcf = 000000000100 / / P:608 T:3380 8-32-531 CardWriteFile(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-32-531 CardWriteFile(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardWriteFile(): Dir Name = mscp, File Name = cmapfile / / P:608 T:3380 CardWriteFile(): cmapfile = 660031006500300035003000300030002D0031003600380038002D0034006200380063002D0039006500300066002D003000310061006200300066006200340062003800660037000000000000000000010000000000 / / P:608 T:3380 8-32-921 CardWriteFile(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-32-921 CardWriteFile(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardWriteFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardcf / / P:608 T:3380 CardWriteFile(): cardcf = 000000000200 / / P:608 T:3380 8-33-0 CardWriteFile(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-33-0 CardWriteFile(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardWriteFile(): Dir Name = mscp, File Name = cmapfile / / P:608 T:3380 CardWriteFile(): cmapfile = 660031006500300035003000300030002D0031003600380038002D0034006200380063002D0039006500300066002D003000310061006200300066006200340062003800660037000000000000000000030000000000 / / P:608 T:3380 8-33-109 CardWriteFile(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-33-125 CardQueryCapabilities(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 8-33-125 CardQueryCapabilities(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-33-125 CardWriteFile(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardWriteFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardcf / / P:608 T:3380 CardWriteFile(): cardcf = 000001000200 / / P:608 T:3380 8-33-203 CardWriteFile(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-33-203 CardCreateContainer(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 8-35-515 CardCreateContainer(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-35-531 CardWriteFile(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardWriteFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardcf / / P:608 T:3380 CardWriteFile(): cardcf = 000001000300 / / P:608 T:3380 8-35-609 CardWriteFile(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-35-609 CardWriteFile(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardWriteFile(): Dir Name = mscp, File Name = cmapfile / / P:608 T:3380 CardWriteFile(): cmapfile = 660031006500300035003000300030002D0031003600380038002D0034006200380063002D0039006500300066002D003000310061006200300066006200340062003800660037000000000000000000030000040000 / / P:608 T:3380 8-35-734 CardWriteFile(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-35-734 CardGetContainerInfo(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 8-35-796 CardGetContainerInfo(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:5764 8-37-296 CardDeauthenticate(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:5764 8-37-312 CardDeauthenticate(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-37-312 CardReadFile(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardReadFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardcf / / P:608 T:3380 CardReadFile(): cardcf = 000001000300 / / P:608 T:3380 8-37-375 CardReadFile(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-37-375 CardReadFile(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardReadFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardcf / / P:608 T:3380 CardReadFile(): cardcf = 000001000300 / / P:608 T:3380 8-37-437 CardReadFile(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-37-437 CardAuthenticatePin(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardAuthenticatePin(): User PIN = 0000 / / P:608 T:3380 8-37-468 CardAuthenticatePin(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-37-484 CardWriteFile(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardWriteFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardcf / / P:608 T:3380 CardWriteFile(): cardcf = 000001000400 / / P:608 T:3380 8-37-546 CardWriteFile(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-37-562 CardDeleteFile(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardDeleteFile(): Dir Name = mscp, File Name = ksc00 / / P:608 T:3380 8-37-625 CardDeleteFile(): SCARD_E_FILE_NOT_FOUND (0x80100024) /* P:608 T:3380 CardDeleteFile(): FAILED /* P:608 T:3380 8-37-625 CardReadFile(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardReadFile(): Dir Name = mscp, File Name = cmapfile / / P:608 T:3380 CardReadFile(): cmapfile = 660031006500300035003000300030002D0031003600380038002D0034006200380063002D0039006500300066002D003000310061006200300066006200340062003800660037000000000000000000030000040000 / / P:608 T:3380 8-37-718 CardReadFile(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-37-718 CardWriteFile(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardWriteFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardcf / / P:608 T:3380 CardWriteFile(): cardcf = 000001000500 / / P:608 T:3380 8-37-796 CardWriteFile(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-37-796 CardDeleteFile(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardDeleteFile(): Dir Name = mscp, File Name = kxc00 / / P:608 T:3380 8-37-875 CardDeleteFile(): SCARD_E_FILE_NOT_FOUND (0x80100024) /* P:608 T:3380 CardDeleteFile(): FAILED /* P:608 T:3380 8-37-875 CardWriteFile(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardWriteFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardcf / / P:608 T:3380 CardWriteFile(): cardcf = 000002000500 / / P:608 T:3380 8-37-953 CardWriteFile(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-37-953 CardDeleteContainer(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 8-38-578 CardDeleteContainer(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-38-593 CardReadFile(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardReadFile(): Dir Name = mscp, File Name = cmapfile / / P:608 T:3380 CardReadFile(): cmapfile = 660031006500300035003000300030002D0031003600380038002D0034006200380063002D0039006500300066002D003000310061006200300066006200340062003800660037000000000000000000030000040000 / / P:608 T:3380 8-38-687 CardReadFile(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-38-687 CardWriteFile(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardWriteFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardcf / / P:608 T:3380 CardWriteFile(): cardcf = 000002000600 / / P:608 T:3380 8-38-781 CardWriteFile(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-38-781 CardWriteFile(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 CardWriteFile(): Dir Name = mscp, File Name = cmapfile / / P:608 T:3380 CardWriteFile(): cmapfile = 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 / / P:608 T:3380 8-38-906 CardWriteFile(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:5764 8-40-406 CardDeauthenticate(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:5764 8-40-421 CardDeauthenticate(): SUCCESS /* P:608 T:3380 8-40-671 CardDeleteContext(): BEGIN /* P:608 T:3380 8-40-687 CardDeleteContext(): SUCCESS in windows 7: /* P:3368 T:3800 17-39-515 CardAcquireContext(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-39-515 CardAcquireContext(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-39-515 CardAcquireContext(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-39-515 CardAcquireContext(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-39-531 CardAcquireContext(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-39-531 CardAcquireContext(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-39-531 CardAcquireContext(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-39-531 CardAcquireContext(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-187 CardAcquireContext(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-187 CardAcquireContext(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-187 CardDeleteContext(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-187 CardDeleteContext(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-187 CardAcquireContext(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-187 CardAcquireContext(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-187 CardDeleteContext(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-203 CardDeleteContext(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-203 CardAcquireContext(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-203 CardAcquireContext(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-203 CardDeleteContext(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-203 CardDeleteContext(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-203 CardAcquireContext(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-203 CardAcquireContext(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-218 CardDeleteContext(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-218 CardDeleteContext(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-218 CardAcquireContext(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-218 CardAcquireContext(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-218 CardGetChallenge(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 CardGetChallenge(): Challenge = BF830855CDCA4F0D / / P:3368 T:3800 17-41-234 CardGetChallenge(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-234 CardAuthenticateChallenge(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 CardAuthenticateChallenge(): Response = A2DB6F882D402D94 / / P:3368 T:3800 17-41-234 CardAuthenticateChallenge(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-234 CardDeauthenticate(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-250 CardDeauthenticate(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-250 CardAuthenticatePin(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 CardAuthenticatePin(): User PIN = 0000 / / P:3368 T:3800 17-41-265 CardAuthenticatePin(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-265 CardDeauthenticate(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-265 CardDeauthenticate(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-265 CardDeleteContext(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-281 CardDeleteContext(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-281 CardAcquireContext(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-281 CardAcquireContext(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-281 CardAuthenticatePin(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 CardAuthenticatePin(): User PIN = 0000 / / P:3368 T:3800 17-41-296 CardAuthenticatePin(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-296 CardQueryCapabilities(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-296 CardQueryCapabilities(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-296 CardAuthenticatePin(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 CardAuthenticatePin(): User PIN = 0000 / / P:3368 T:3800 17-41-312 CardAuthenticatePin(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-312 CardDeauthenticate(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-328 CardDeauthenticate(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-328 CardDeleteContext(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-328 CardDeleteContext(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-359 CardAcquireContext(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-359 CardAcquireContext(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-359 CardReadFile(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 CardReadFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardid / / P:3368 T:3800 CardReadFile(): cardid = 34363438653733652D346430342D3463 / / P:3368 T:3800 17-41-406 CardReadFile(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-406 CardReadFile(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 CardReadFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardcf / / P:3368 T:3800 CardReadFile(): cardcf = 000000000000 / / P:3368 T:3800 17-41-453 CardReadFile(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-453 CardReadFile(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 CardReadFile(): Dir Name = mscp, File Name = cmapfile / / P:3368 T:3800 17-41-531 CardReadFile(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 CardReadFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardcf / / P:3368 T:3800 CardReadFile(): cardcf = 000000000000 / / P:3368 T:3800 17-41-593 CardReadFile(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-593 CardAuthenticatePin(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 CardAuthenticatePin(): User PIN = 0000 / / P:3368 T:3800 17-41-609 CardAuthenticatePin(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-609 CardDeauthenticate(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-609 CardDeauthenticate(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-609 CardDeleteContext(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-625 CardDeleteContext(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-625 CardAcquireContext(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-625 CardAcquireContext(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-625 CardReadFile(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 CardReadFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardid / / P:3368 T:3800 CardReadFile(): cardid = 34363438653733652D346430342D3463 / / P:3368 T:3800 17-41-671 CardReadFile(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-687 CardReadFile(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 CardReadFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardcf / / P:3368 T:3800 CardReadFile(): cardcf = 000000000000 / / P:3368 T:3800 17-41-734 CardReadFile(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-734 CardQueryFreeSpace(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-750 CardQueryFreeSpace(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-750 CardAuthenticatePin(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 CardAuthenticatePin(): User PIN = 0000 / / P:3368 T:3800 17-41-765 CardAuthenticatePin(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-765 CardWriteFile(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 CardWriteFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardcf / / P:3368 T:3800 CardWriteFile(): cardcf = 000000000100 / / P:3368 T:3800 17-41-828 CardWriteFile(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-41-828 CardWriteFile(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 CardWriteFile(): Dir Name = mscp, File Name = cmapfile / / P:3368 T:3800 CardWriteFile(): cmapfile = 370062003800640030006200390031002D0063003600650064002D0034003000650033002D0062006100610037002D006200620032003800640063003800610035003300330032000000000000000000010000000000 / / P:3368 T:3800 17-42-218 CardWriteFile(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-42-234 CardWriteFile(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 CardWriteFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardcf / / P:3368 T:3800 CardWriteFile(): cardcf = 000000000200 / / P:3368 T:3800 17-42-296 CardWriteFile(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-42-296 CardWriteFile(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 CardWriteFile(): Dir Name = mscp, File Name = cmapfile / / P:3368 T:3800 CardWriteFile(): cmapfile = 370062003800640030006200390031002D0063003600650064002D0034003000650033002D0062006100610037002D006200620032003800640063003800610035003300330032000000000000000000030000000000 / / P:3368 T:3800 17-42-390 CardWriteFile(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-42-406 CardQueryCapabilities(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-42-406 CardQueryCapabilities(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-42-406 CardWriteFile(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 CardWriteFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardcf / / P:3368 T:3800 CardWriteFile(): cardcf = 000001000200 / / P:3368 T:3800 17-42-468 CardWriteFile(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-42-468 CardCreateContainer(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-48-421 CardCreateContainer(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-48-437 CardWriteFile(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 CardWriteFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardcf / / P:3368 T:3800 CardWriteFile(): cardcf = 000001000300 / / P:3368 T:3800 17-48-484 CardWriteFile(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-48-500 CardWriteFile(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 CardWriteFile(): Dir Name = mscp, File Name = cmapfile / / P:3368 T:3800 CardWriteFile(): cmapfile = 370062003800640030006200390031002D0063003600650064002D0034003000650033002D0062006100610037002D006200620032003800640063003800610035003300330032000000000000000000030000040000 / / P:3368 T:3800 17-48-593 CardWriteFile(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-48-593 CardGetContainerInfo(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 17-48-640 CardGetContainerInfo(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:288 17-50-140 CardDeauthenticate(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:288 17-50-140 CardDeauthenticate(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-50-140 CardReadFile(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 CardReadFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardid / / P:3368 T:3800 CardReadFile(): cardid = 34363438653733652D346430342D3463 / / P:3368 T:3800 17-50-187 CardReadFile(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-50-187 CardReadFile(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 CardReadFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardcf / / P:3368 T:3800 CardReadFile(): cardcf = 000001000300 / / P:3368 T:3800 17-50-234 CardReadFile(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-50-234 CardReadFile(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 CardReadFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardid / / P:3368 T:3800 CardReadFile(): cardid = 34363438653733652D346430342D3463 / / P:3368 T:3800 17-50-296 CardReadFile(): SUCCESS /* P:3368 T:3800 17-50-296 CardReadFile(): BEGIN /* P:3368 T:3800 CardReadFile(): Dir Name = ROOT, File Name = cardid / / P:3368 T:3800 CardReadFile(): cardid = 34363438653733652D346430342D3463 / / P:3368 T:3800 17-50-343 CardReadFile(): SUCCESS Comparing the two logs, it seems that in win 7 cmck always read file, read file, read file... and fail, never get into CardDeleteContainer or CardWriteFile :( Please help me!!!! Many thanks!

  Read the article

• RhinoMocks Testing callback method

  - by joblot

  Hi All I have a service proxy class that makes asyn call to service operation. I use a callback method to pass results back to my view model. Doing functional testing of view model, I can mock service proxy to ensure methods are called on the proxy, but how can I ensure that callback method is called as well? With RhinoMocks I can test that events are handled and event raise events on the mocked object, but how can I test callbacks? ViewModel: public class MyViewModel { public void GetDataAsync() { // Use DI framework to get the object IMyServiceClient myServiceClient = IoC.Resolve<IMyServiceClient>(); myServiceClient.GetData(GetDataAsyncCallback); } private void GetDataAsyncCallback(Entity entity, ServiceError error) { // do something here... } } ServiceProxy: public class MyService : ClientBase, IMyServiceClient { // Constructor public NertiAdminServiceClient(string endpointConfigurationName, string remoteAddress) : base(endpointConfigurationName, remoteAddress) { } // IMyServiceClient member. public void GetData(Action<Entity, ServiceError> callback) { Channel.BeginGetData(EndGetData, callback); } private void EndGetData(IAsyncResult result) { Action<Entity, ServiceError> callback = result.AsyncState as Action<Entity, ServiceError>; ServiceError error; Entity results = Channel.EndGetData(out error, result); if (callback != null) callback(results, error); } } Thanks

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70  | Next Page >