Search Results

Search found 3673 results on 147 pages for 'pop3 ssl'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 64/147 | < Previous Page | 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71  | Next Page >

  • certificate working on IP but not on URL

    - by Stephan
    I asked this question on stackoverflow, and I've been suggested to repost it here. I have a problem accessing my site (on https) with IEMobile 9 (WP 7.5). It says it's got problem with the certificate, as if it wasn't valid. Everything works on any other browser or platform I tested (android (several phones and a galaxy tab with stock browser, firefox, opera, dolphin), iOS (iphone and ipad with safari and chrome), an old nokia with symbian, windows 7, linux and mac). To try to solve this I saved the certificate (.cer) on the server and accessed it from the phone browser. It always complained except when I accessed it through the server IP (192.168.xx.xx). At that point it (said it) installed correctly the certificate. If then I try to access the index.html still using the IP all works fine and it doesn't complain about the certificate. If, though, I try to access the index using the actual URL (blah.myblah.com), it complains again about the certificate, as if it wasn't installed! It isn't a problem of DNS, cause that's up and serving the right ip, and the phone is correctly setup to use it. The certificate is signed by geotrust/rapidssl for *.myblah.com.

    Read the article

  • TLS-SRP ciphersuites support in browsers

    - by dag
    i'm doing some research on how browsers support TLS-SRP (RFC5054). I know that TLS-SRP is implemented in GnuTLS, OpenSSL as of release 1.0.1, Apache mod_gnutls, cURL, TLS Lite and SecureBlackbox. I don't find any fresh source of information, only this from 2011: http://sim.ivi.co/2011/07/compare-tls-cipher-suites-for-web.html I'm testing them manually at the moment, but as far as i know nobody seems to support it. My interest is then in understanding if browsers are planning to support these ciphersuites in the future, apart from the current state. Actual findings (i'm sorry i can't include more than 2 links): Firefox: BugZilla bug id: 405155 IE: Microsoft connect Bug ID:788412 , date:22/05/2013 (closed) Chromium/Chrome: the interesting work by quinn slack http://qslack.com/2011/04/tls-srp-in-chrome-announcement/ Chromium code review: 6804032 Any other help?

    Read the article

  • Apache: Setting up a reverse proxy configuration with SSL with url rewriting

    - by user1172468
    There is a host: secure.foo.com that exposes a webservice using https I want to create a reverse proxy using Apache that maps a local http port on a server internal.bar.com to the https service exposed by secure.foo.com Since it a web service I need to map all urls so that a path: https://secure.foo.com/some/path/123 is accessible by going to: http://internal.bar.com/some/path/123 Thanks. I've gotten this far: <VirtualHost *:80> ServerName gnip.measr.com SSLProxyEngine On ProxyPass / https://internal.bar.com/ </VirtualHost> I think this is working except for the url rewriting. Some resources I've found on this are: Setting up a complex Apache reverse proxy Apache as reverse proxy for https server

    Read the article

  • Fingerprint of PEM ssh key

    - by Unknown
    I have a PEM file which I add to a running ssh-agent: $ file query.pem query.pem: PEM RSA private key $ ssh-add ./query.pem Identity added: ./query.pem (./query.pem) $ ssh-add -l | grep query 2048 ef:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX ./query.pem (RSA) My question is how I can get the key fingerprint I see in ssh-agent directly from the file. I know ssh-keygen -l -f some_key works for "normal" ssh keys, but not for PEM files. If I try ssh-keygen on the .pem file, I get: $ ssh-keygen -l -f ./query.pem key_read: uudecode PRIVATE KEY----- failed key_read: uudecode PRIVATE KEY----- failed ./query.pem is not a public key file. This key starts with: -----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY----- MIIEp.... etc. as opposed to a "regular" private key, which looks like: -----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY----- Proc-Type: 4,ENCRYPTED DEK-Info: AES-128-CBC,E15F2.... etc.

    Read the article

  • Powershell: Cannot connect via SSL

    - by JSWork
    Am following "secrets to powershell remoting" to setup an SLL account and seem to be missing a step. I ran Winrm create winrm/config/Listener?Address=*+Transport=HTTPS @{Hostname="redacted";CertificateThumbprint="redacted"} and got PS WSMan:\localhost&gt; dir wsman:\localhost\listener\Listener_1184937132 WSManConfig: Microsoft.WSMan.Management\WSMan::localhost\Listener\Listener_1184937132 Name Value Type ---- ----- ---- Address * System.String Transport HTTP System.String Port 5985 System.String Hostname System.String Enabled true System.String URLPrefix wsman System.String CertificateThumbprint System.String ListeningOn_756355952 10.0.0.54 System.String ListeningOn_1201550598 127.0.0.1 System.String PS WSMan:\localhost&gt; dir wsman:\localhost\listener\Listener_1187163138 WSManConfig: Microsoft.WSMan.Management\WSMan::localhost\Listener\Listener_1187163138 Name Value Type ---- ----- ---- Address * System.String Transport HTTP System.String Port 80 System.String Hostname System.String Enabled true System.String URLPrefix wsman System.String CertificateThumbprint System.String ListeningOn_756355952 10.0.0.54 System.String ListeningOn_1201550598 127.0.0.1 System.String PS WSMan:\localhost&gt; dir wsman:\localhost\listener\Listener_220862350 WSManConfig: Microsoft.WSMan.Management\WSMan::localhost\Listener\Listener_220862350 Name Value Type ---- ----- ---- Address * System.String Transport HTTPS System.String Port 5986 System.String Hostname redacted System.String Enabled true System.String URLPrefix wsman System.String CertificateThumbprint redacted System.String ListeningOn_756355952 10.0.0.54 System.String ListeningOn_1201550598 127.0.0.1 System.String Trouble is when i do this PS C:\Users\redacted> enter-pssession -Computername redacted -Credential redacted\redacted -UseSSL I get this Enter-PSSession : Connecting to remote server failed with the following error message : The client cannot connect to th e destination specified in the request. Verify that the service on the destination is running and is accepting requests . Consult the logs and documentation for the WS-Management service running on the destination, most commonly IIS or Win RM. If the destination is the WinRM service, run the following command on the destination to analyze and configure the WinRM service: "winrm quickconfig". For more information, see the about_Remote_Troubleshooting Help topic. At line:1 char:16 + enter-pssession <<<< -Computername redacted -Credential redacted\redacted -UseSSL + CategoryInfo : InvalidArgument: (redacted:String) [Enter-PSSession], PSRemotingTransportException + FullyQualifiedErrorId : CreateRemoteRunspaceFailed This happens even when the firewall is off completely and when the machine tires to connect to itself locally. On top of that, despite the listners eing lsited on wsman, when I run PS WSMan:\localhost&gt; Get-PSSessionConfiguration I get Name PSVersion StartupScript Permission ---- --------- ------------- ---------- Microsoft.PowerShell 2.0 PS WSMan:\localhost&gt; Any ideas what I'm missing/doing wrong? edit: Windows 2003. Powershell v2.0

    Read the article

  • A non interactive alternative to makecert.

    - by mark
    Dear ladies and sirs. I have a need to create a self signed certificate non interactively. Unfortunately, the only tool that I know of (makecert) is interactive - it uses GUI to ask for a password. My OS is Windows (from XP to 2008). The only thing close that I managed to find is http://www.codeproject.com/Tips/125982/How-to-run-Makecert-without-password-window.aspx, however, it is still not good. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Problems serving SVN over HTTPS on Ubuntu 10.04

    - by odd parity
    We've been experiencing some problems with our Subversion server after upgrading to Ubuntu 10.04. When trying to access a repository, regardless of client (I've tried git-svn and svn on Windows as well as svn on Ubuntu 10.04, from different computers and network locations), I get a 400 bad request. Here's the output from svn: svn: Server sent unexpected return value (400 Bad Request) in response to OPTIONS request for 'https://svn.example.org/svn/programs' Here are the relevant entries from the Apache logs (I'm running Apache 2.2): error.log [Mon Jun 14 11:29:31 2010] [error] [client x.x.x.x] request failed: error reading the headers ssl_access.log x.x.x.x - - [14/Jun/2010:11:29:28 +0200] "OPTIONS /svn/programs HTTP/1.1" 401 2643 "-" "SVN/1.6.6 (r40053) neon/0.29.0" x.x.x.x - - [14/Jun/2010:11:29:31 +0200] "ction-set/></D:options>OPTIONS /svn/programs HTTP/1.1" 400 644 "-" "SVN/1.6.6 (r40053) neon/0.29.0" If anyone has run into similar problems or could give me a pointer to track down the cause of this I'd be very grateful - I'd really like to avoid having to downgrade the box again.

    Read the article

  • force https with apache before .htpasswd

    - by johnlai2004
    I have this in my .htaccess file RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://www.myweb.com/phpmyadmin$1 [R,L] AuthUserFile /var/www/myweb/.htpasswd AuthGroupFile /dev/null AuthName "Sovereign Databases" AuthType Basic <Limit GET> require valid-user </Limit> But everytime I go to http://www.myweb.com/phpmyadmin, the .htpasswd prompts me for a credentials BEFORE i'm redirected to https://www.myweb.com/phpmyadmin. After I type in my username and password, I get redirected to https://www.myweb.com/phpmyadmin. The problem is that I don't want anyone to submit their username and password unencrypted via http. How do I force people to login via the https version even if they typed in the http version?

    Read the article

  • Apache 2.2.14: SSLCARevocation location

    - by Doc
    I am installing a .crl in my apache config. It looks like this: VirtualHost default DocumentRoot "web" ServerName example.com SSLEngine on SSLCertificateFile "cert.crt" SSLCertificateKeyFile "key.key" SSLCertificateChainFile "cert.ca-bundle" SSLProtocol -all +SSLv3 SSLCipherSuite SSLv3:+HIGH:+MEDIUM Directory Order deny,allow Allow from all SSLCACertificateFile "ClientRootCert.crt" SSLVerifyClient require SSLVerifyDepth 3 SSLCARevocationFile "CRLList.crl" Directory VirtualHost When Apache is started, I get the error: SSLCARevocationFile not allowed here When I place SSLCARevocationFile above the Directory tag, Apache starts, but all client certs are rejected with the message: ssl_error_expired_cert_alert (both revoked and active certs) How to solve this?

    Read the article

  • with nginx having the base url rewrite to https

    - by jchysk
    I'd like only my base domain www.domain.com to be rewritten to https://www.domain.com By default in my https block I have it reroute to http:// if it's not ~uri = "/" (base domain) or static content. server { listen 443; set $ssltoggle 2; if ($uri ~ ^/(img|js|css|static)/) { set $ssltoggle 1; } if ($uri = '/') { set $ssltoggle 1; } if ($ssltoggle != 1) { rewrite ^(.*)$ http://$server_name$1 permanent; } } So in my http block I need to do the rewrite if it has to https: server { listen 80; if ($uri = '/') { set $ssltoggle 1; } if ($ssltoggle = 1) { rewrite ^(.*)$ https://$server_name$1 permanent; } } If I don't have the $uri = '/' if-statement in the http block, then https works fine if I go directly to it, but I won't get redirected if I go to regular http which is expected. If I do put that in-statement in the http block then everything stops working within minutes. It might work for a few requests, but will always stop within a minute or so. In browsers I just get a blank page for all requests. If I restart nginx it continues to not work until I remove both if-statement blocks in both the https and http blocks and restart nginx. When I look in the error logs I don't see anything logged. When I look in the access log I see this message: "-" 400 0 "-" "-" which I assume means a 400 error. I don't understand why this doesn't work for me. My end goal is to have the base domain be https-only while all other pages default to http. How can I achieve this?

    Read the article

  • Why is mcrypt not included in most Linux distributions?

    - by Daniel Lopez
    libmcrypt is a powerful encryption library that is very popular with PHP-based applications. However, most Linux distributions do not include it. This causes problems for many users that need to download and compile it separately. I am guessing that the reason it is not shipped is related to encryption or patent issues. However, the source code for library itself is hosted and available on sourceforge.net I have been searching unsuccessfully for a document of authoritative post that explains the exact issues why this extension is not bundled with mainstream distributions. Can anyone provide a pointer to such material or provide an explanation?

    Read the article

  • Creating a chain of certificates

    - by StackedCrooked
    This question is a follow up to my previous question, which was, in retrospect, not completely answered: http://superuser.com/questions/126121/how-to-create-my-own-certificate-chain. I'll represent my certificate chain like this: ROOT - A - B - C - ... I am now able to create the ROOT and A certificates, but I didn't succeed in continueing the chain. My command for creating the root certificate is: openssl req -new -newkey rsa:1024 -nodes -out ca.csr -keyout ca.key openssl x509 -trustout -signkey ca.key -days 365 -req -in ca.csr -out ca.pem Certificate A: openssl genrsa -out client.key 1024 openssl req -new -key client.key -out client.csr openssl ca -in client.csr -out client.cer This command depends on the root certificate implicitly using the data found in the openssl config file. Certificate B will only rely on A, so the previous command won't work here. How can I complete the chain?

    Read the article

  • DNS name not on cert

    - by blsub6
    I've got an interesting one... My users have always typed in 'mail' to get to their mail. There was an internal DNS A record that resolved that to the IP of the mail server. I'm putting in an Exchange server to replace that. In order for people to get their mail, I try putting in an A record that does the same thing as the previous one. When I try to get to OWA, it tells me that the certificate on the server is not trusted. I only have the names: mail.mydomain.com autodiscover.mydomain.com autodiscover.mydomain.internal mydomain.internal mailserver.mydomain.internal so when the browser sees that this cert is trying to cover https://mail/owa it says the cert's not trusted. What amy I supposed to do about that?

    Read the article

  • Issues when upgrading OpenSSL?

    - by Zed Said
    We are running an old version of OpenSSL 0.9.7e and would like to upgrade to the most current. Our server is running Debian, and I am wondering if there would be any issues with just upgrading it using apt-get? Would we have to worry about anything breaking, or updating any configurations?

    Read the article

  • Sun Java keytool importing EV certificates into a single keystore

    - by ss0
    At my current job we are using tomcat, customers have custom web portals setup on their own local machines. EV certs are new to me, they have 2 part intermediary and a primary certificate. For our product to work it appears I need to get all three parts installed under a single keystore entry. How can I roll all three parts into a single x.509 compliant file for import? They syntax I am using is as follows: /blah/system/j2sdk/bin/keytool -import -alias foo -keystore /zix/system/jdk1.5.0_06/jre/lib/security/cacerts -file certname.pem -trustcacerts where foo = the keystore name and certname.pem is the main cert. I have tried importing the intermediate certs under their own names into the keystore and I don't know if it's just the product I have to work with (not vanilla tomcat) or what but it doesn't see those. I have seen a working system and all three certs were under the single keystore alias. Anyone have any ideas?

    Read the article

  • How do http proxies determine https traffic with a single port?

    - by badunk
    If a proxy receives the tcp packet, then the destination ip address and port are that of the proxy. In that case, I imagine the only way a proxy can still resolve the intended destination is either through routing the source ip address/port or through the host field in the http header. Is this correct? In both Fiddler and Charles http proxies, I noticed that the tool accepts both http and https connections through a single port that you can specify. What do these tools do to tell the difference between the two types of connections?

    Read the article

  • Setting Up SNI with Apache 2.2.12 and openssl

    - by CCG121
    I am running Apache 2.2.12 and openssl 0.9.8g all of my Apache are in /etc/apache2/sites-available/default and i have 2 domains with certificates www.site.com & d7.site.com my <VirtualHost *:443> DocumentRoot /var/www/domain.com ServerAdmin [email protected] ServerName www.name.tld SSLStrictSNIVHostCheck off SSLVerifyClient None SSLEngine on SSLCertificateFile /var/www/sslcerts/name.tld/www_name_tld.crt SSLCertificateKeyFile /var/www/sslcerts/name.tld/private.key </VirtualHost> <VirtualHost *:443> DocumentRoot /var/www/d7 ServerAdmin [email protected] ServerName d7.domain.tld SSLStrictSNIVHostCheck off SSLVerifyClient None SSLEngine on SSLCertificateFile /var/www/sslcerts/d7.domain.tld/server.crt SSLCertificateKeyFile /var/www/sslcerts/d7.domain.tld/private.key </VirtualHost>

    Read the article

  • Exchange 2003 ActiveSync problem with certificate

    - by colemanm
    We're having problems getting iPhones to sync properly with SBS 2003 Exchange. When you add a new Exchange ActiveSync account on an iPhone and enter all the pertinent information, it shows a "Verifying Exchange account info" message for a minute or so, then says everything's verified and asks what you want to sync, Mail, Contacts, Calendars... so it looks like it's working. However, when you go to the Mail app and select the Exchange email account, it just shows an "Inbox" folder with nothing in it. When you try refreshing, it attempts for a second, then says "Last Updated" with a timestamp, as if it worked, but there's no mail and no error message/feedback at all. I think I've narrowed it down to some sort of certificate issue, but I'm having trouble finding out where to go from here... I ran MS's Exchange connectivity testing tool with these results: Our cert was purchased from Network Solutions, and I'd already added it to the IIS Default Website for OWA purposes. But this report makes it look like the cert is somehow problematic. I don't know what to do now... Here's a shot of the cert details, just in case:

    Read the article

  • Intermediate certificates on NLB load balanced servers

    - by MrVimes
    I am fairly sure I know how to install the 'main' certificate on load balanced servers (install on one, export, import to the others) but I'm not quite sure what to do about the intermediate certificate (the one you install using the certificates snap in in mmc) Do I manually install it using mmc on each server? or is there a similar process involved to the main cert (install, then export, then import on the others?)

    Read the article

  • Web based interface for open SSL client certificates

    - by Felix
    Hi there! We are currently developing a apache2-based web application and want to invite some beta testers to give it a try. To be on the safe side, access should be provided by individual browser certificates (.p12) which are issued using a (fake) CA. Our users should be passing a complete register/login process and some of them will be granted administrative privileges within the application. That's why a preceding simple web-based authentication won't be sufficient. Atm, I am using a serverside shellscript to generate the certificates each time. Do you know about a small, web-based tool to simplify the process of generating / revoking those certificates? Maybe an overview of the CA's index.txt plus the option to revoke a cert and a link to download them directly?

    Read the article

  • Windows 7 will not install a root certificate

    - by Farseeker
    I have a web service that uses a self-signed certificate, so I need to install the certificate as a Trusted Root so that I can avoid all the security errors that having a self-signed certificate brings with it. Using Windows 7, I'm going to: Start > Internet Explorer > Run as Administrator > Tools > Internet Options > Content > Certificates > Trusted Root Certification Authorities > Import > (select file) > Next > OK, and Windows reports Import Successful However, the import is NOT successful. The certificate does not show in the list of trusted roots, and certificate errors still show up. If I import the certificate into the Trusted Publishers container, it imports correctly, but this does not solve my security errors. Any ideas?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71  | Next Page >