Search Results

Search found 13523 results on 541 pages for 'group selection'.

Page 65/541 | < Previous Page | 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72  | Next Page >

  • LINQ to SQL join when there aren't results

    - by Boarder2
    Given the following database structure I'm trying to write a LINQ query that will return images grouped by tags it's associated with. So far I've got this: var images = from img in db.Images join imgTags in db.ImageTags on img.idImage equals imgTags.idImage join t in db.Tags on imgTags.idTag equals t.idTag where img.OCRData.Contains(searchText.Text) group img by new { t.TagName } into aGroup select new { GroupName = aGroup.Key.TagName, Items = from x in aGroup select new ImageFragment() { ImageID = x.idImage, ScanDate = x.ScanTime } }; Which works great. However, I also want to return Images that do not have any tags associated with them in a group of "(Untagged)" or something. I can't wrap my head around how I would do this without inserting a default tag for every image and that seems like generally not a very good solution.

    Read the article

  • MySQL GROUP BY and JOIN

    - by christian
    Guys what's wrong with this SQL query: $sql = "SELECT res.Age, res.Gender, answer.*, $get_sum, SUM(CASE WHEN res.Gender='Male' THEN 1 else 0 END) AS males, SUM(CASE WHEN res.Gender='Female' THEN 1 else 0 END) AS females FROM Respondents AS res INNER JOIN Answers as answer ON answer.RespondentID=res.RespondentID INNER JOIN Questions as question ON answer.Answer=question.id WHERE answer.Question='Q1' GROUP BY res.Age ORDER BY res.Age ASC"; the $get_sum is an array of sql statement derived from another table: $sum[]= "SUM(CASE WHEN answer.Answer=".$db->f("id")." THEN 1 else 0 END) AS item".$db->f("id"); $get_sum = implode(', ', $sum); the query above return these values: Age: 20 item1 0 item2 1 item3 1 item4 1 item5 0 item6 0 Subtotal for Age 20 3 Age: 24 item1 2 item2 2 item3 2 item4 2 item5 1 item6 0 Subtotal for Age 24 9 It should return: Subtotal for Age 20 1 Subtotal for Age 24 2 In my sample data there are 3 respondents 2 are 24 yrs of age and the other one is 20 years old.

    Read the article

  • Replace named group in regex

    - by Tomas Voracek
    I want to use regular expression same way as string.Format. I will explain I have: string pattern = "^(?<PREFIX>abc_)(?<ID>[0-9])+(?<POSTFIX>_def)$"; string input = "abc_123_def"; Regex regex = new Regex(pattern, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase); string replacement = "456"; Console.WriteLine(regex.Replace(input, string.Format("${{PREFIX}}{0}${{POSTFIX}}", replacement))); This works, but i must provide "input" to regex.Replace. I do not want that. I want to use pattern for matching but also for creating strings same way as with string format, replacing named group "ID" with value. Is that possible? I'm looking for something like: string pattern = "^(?<PREFIX>abc_)(?<ID>[0-9])+(?<POSTFIX>_def)$"; string result = ReplaceWithFormat(pattern, "ID", 999); Result will contain "abc_999_def". How to accomplish this?

    Read the article

  • Group SQL tables in SQL Server Management Studio object explorer

    - by MainMa
    I have a table which has approximately sixty tables, and other tables are added constantly. Each table is a part of a schema. A such quantity of tables makes it difficult to use Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio 2008. For example, I must scroll up in object explorer to access database related functions, or scroll down each time I need to access Views or Security features. Is it possible to group several tables to be able to expand or collapse them in Object Explorer? Maybe a folder may be displayed for each schema, letting collapse the folders I don't need to use?

    Read the article

  • Django query: Count and Group BY

    - by Tyler Lane
    I have a query that I'm trying to figure the "django" way of doing it: I want to take the last 100 calls from Call. Which is easy: calls = Call.objects.all().order_by('-call_time')[:100] However the next part I can't find the way to do it via django's ORM. I want to get a list of the call_types and the number of calls each one has WITHIN that previous queryset i just did. Normally i would do a query like this: "SELECT COUNT(id),calltype FROM call WHERE id IN ( SELECT id FROM call ORDER BY call_time DESC LIMIT 100 ) GROUP BY calltype;" I can't seem to find the django way of doing this particular query. Here are my 2 models: class Call( models.Model ): call_time = models.DateTimeField( "Call Time", auto_now = False, auto_now_add = False ) description = models.CharField( max_length = 150 ) response = models.CharField( max_length = 50 ) event_num = models.CharField( max_length = 20 ) report_num = models.CharField( max_length = 20 ) address = models.CharField( max_length = 150 ) zip_code = models.CharField( max_length = 10 ) geom = models.PointField(srid=4326) calltype = models.ForeignKey(CallType) objects = models.GeoManager() class CallType( models.Model ): name = models.CharField( max_length = 50 ) description = models.CharField( max_length = 150 ) active = models.BooleanField() time_init = models.DateTimeField( "Date Added", auto_now = False, auto_now_add = True ) objects = models.Manager()

    Read the article

  • How to group rules in jquery

    - by Daniele
    Hi I've got a simple question. I've this code below, i use ajax three times in very similiar ways the only things that change are the data passed and the id of the target. Is there a way to group these instructions in a simple one? Thx D. $('#fld_email').focusout(function() { var request_email = $(this).val(); $.ajax({type:"GET", url: "autocomplete.asp", data: "fld=firstname&email="+request_email, beforeSend: function(){$('#fld_firstname').addClass('ac_loading');}, success: function(msg){$('#fld_firstname').val(msg);$('#fld_firstname').removeClass('ac_loading'); } }); $.ajax({type:"GET", url: "autocomplete.asp", data: "fld=lastname&email="+request_email, beforeSend: function(){$('#fld_lastname').addClass('ac_loading');}, success: function(msg){$('#fld_lastname').val(msg);$('#fld_lastname').removeClass('ac_loading');} }); $.ajax({type:"GET", url: "autocomplete.asp", data: "fld=phone&email="+request_email, beforeSend: function(){$('#fld_phone').addClass('ac_loading');}, success: function(msg){$('#fld_phone').val(msg);$('#fld_phone').removeClass('ac_loading');} }); } );

    Read the article

  • mysql query performance help

    - by Stefano
    Hi I have a quite large table storing words contained in email messages mysql> explain t_message_words; +----------------+---------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +----------------+---------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | mwr_key | int(11) | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment | | mwr_message_id | int(11) | NO | MUL | NULL | | | mwr_word_id | int(11) | NO | MUL | NULL | | | mwr_count | int(11) | NO | | 0 | | +----------------+---------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ table contains about 100M rows mwr_message_id is a FK to messages table mwr_word_id is a FK to words table mwr_count is the number of occurrencies of word mwr_word_id in message mwr_message_id To calculate most used words, I use the following query SELECT SUM(mwr_count) AS word_count, mwr_word_id FROM t_message_words GROUP BY mwr_word_id ORDER BY word_count DESC LIMIT 100; that runs almost forever (more than half an hour on the test server) mysql> show processlist; +----+------+----------------+--------+---------+------+----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- | Id | User | Host | db | Command | Time | State | Info +----+------+----------------+--------+---------+------+----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- processlist | 41 | root | localhost:3148 | tst_db | Query | 1955 | Copying to tmp table | SELECT SUM(mwr_count) AS word_count, mwr_word_id FROM t_message_words GROUP BY mwr_word_id | +----+------+----------------+--------+---------+------+----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- 3 rows in set (0.00 sec) Is there anything I can do to "speed up" the query (apart from adding more ram, more cpu, faster disks)? thank you in advance stefano

    Read the article

  • SQL where clause to work with Group by clause after performing a count()

    - by Matt
    Tried my usual references at w3schools and google. No luck I'm trying to produce the following results. QTY is a derived column | Position | QTY -------------------- 1 Clerk 2 2 Mgr 2 Here's what I'm not having luck with: SELECT Position, Count(position) AS 'QTY' FROM tblemployee Where ('QTY' != 1) GROUP BY Position I know that my Position is set up as varchar(255) Count produces a integer data and my where clasue is accurate so that leads me to believe that that Count() is jamming me up. Please throw up an example so I can reference later. Thanks for the help!

    Read the article

  • Grouping data in an NSMutable array

    - by padatronic
    Hi guys, I have an array i load with lots of data from an xml file. I am displaying this on a tableview and then when you click on say an author it goes through to display all their books. At the minute my NSMutableArray has an entry for every each book with title, author and so on. So in the table of authors it display the authors name as many times as they have books. I want to group the array data so the table only displays each author once but the author contains an array of his books. Seems simple but I can't find a group method for arrays. thanks peeps

    Read the article

  • Hos to group the complex list objects by using Linq

    - by Daoming Yang
    I want to select and group the products, and rank them by the number of times they occur. For example, I have an OrderList each of order object has a OrderProductVariantList(OrderLineList), and each of OrderProductVariant object has ProductVariant, and then the ProductVariant object will have a Product object which contains product information. A friend helped me with the following code. It could be compiled, but it did not return any value/result. I used the watch window for the query and it gave me "The name 'query' does not exist in the current context". Can anyone help me? Many thanks. var query = orderList.SelectMany( o => o.OrderLineList ) // results in IEnumerable<OrderProductVariant> .Select( opv => opv.ProductVariant ) .Select( pv => p.Product ) .GroupBy( p => p ) .Select( g => new { Product = g.Key, Count = g.Count() });

    Read the article

  • UAC on Win2k8/VIsta x64 - local "Administrator" works but domain account in Administrators group fai

    - by deltanine
    I have come across a strange problem in one of our applications on win2k8/Vista x64 with UAC enabled. It is a process which hosts the UI for our service and runs in the context of the logged on user. When logged in as a domain user who is a member of the "Administrators" group, writing to the registry under HKLM fails due to UAC with access denied. But when logged in as the local "Administrator" account (non-domain) then writing to the registry succeeds. Both accounts are adminstrators - is there a distinction between domain and non-domain accounts with UAC? What gives?

    Read the article

  • Group SQL tables in Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio object explorer

    - by MainMa
    I have a table which has approximately sixty tables, and other tables are added constantly. Each table is a part of a schema. A such quantity of tables makes it difficult to use Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio 2008. For example, I must scroll up in object explorer to access database related functions, or scroll down each time I need to access Views or Security features. Is it possible to group several tables to be able to expand or collapse them in Object Explorer? Maybe a folder may be displayed for each schema, letting collapse the folders I don't need to use?

    Read the article

  • Problem getting value from "Checkbox group value prompt"

    - by Veer
    Hi, I've value prompt with ui:checkbox group parameter: p_IsLastMonth Name: Prompt_IsLastMonth ItemCount: 1; UseValue:Yes, DisplayValue: LastMonth? and two Date Prompts. Whenever the checkbox is checked, the UseValue 'Yes' is passed to the parameter 'p_IsLastMonth'. But whenever the checkbox is left as it is, it results in an error. Element 'selectOptions' is not valid for content model: 'All(style,defaultSelections,conditionalStyles,conditionalRender,XMLAttributes)' I also tried giving a default value. But the default value has to be in the collection. But i want only one checkbox to be displayed. I tried with html checkbox. But i'm not able to send the value 'either yes or no' to the parameter through javascript because however the finish button overrides the value. Any help?

    Read the article

  • Best practice for web server user/group permissions

    - by Poe
    What's the best practice in a secure manner to setup the user/group and permissions? Here's what we currently have; web server runs as www/www. Fastcgi Php runs as www/www. User's shell/ftp account is username/username. We want the user to be able to have full access to all files, including those created by the web server 'www' from the shell or ftp. Similarly, we want the scripts run by fastcgi/php to be able to create files in user created directories and modify user created files.

    Read the article

  • access custom group

    - by Carlos
    I have my Access 2007 database configured to use "Custom" groups in the navigation pane. I've grouped all my tables in a way that makes sense. However, whenever I update a link table, it loses its grouping. I have not been able to find a way to avoid this. Since it seems to be unavoidable, I'd like to simply have a macro that adds the table back to the right group programatically. I have not found any examples on how to do this. Any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • A simple group-by (no count) in Django

    - by Daniel Quinn
    If this were raw-SQL, it'd be a no-brainer, but in Django, this is proving to be quite difficult to find. What I want is this really: SELECT user_id FROM django_comments WHERE content_type_id = ? AND object_pk = ? GROUP BY user_id It's those last two lines that're the problem. I'd like to do this the "Django-way" but the only thing I've found is mention of aggregates and annotations, which I don't think solve this issue... do they? If someone could explain this to me, I'd really appreciate it.

    Read the article

  • MySQL Query Join Table Selecting Highest Date Value

    - by ALHUI
    Here is the query that I run SELECT cl.cl_id, cc_rego, cc_model, cl_dateIn, cl_dateOut FROM courtesycar cc LEFT JOIN courtesyloan cl ON cc.cc_id = cl.cc_id Results: 1 NXI955 Prado 2013-10-24 11:48:38 NULL 2 RJI603 Avalon 2013-10-24 11:48:42 2013-10-24 11:54:18 3 RJI603 Avalon 2013-10-24 12:01:40 NULL The results that I wanted are to group by the cc_rego values and print the most recent cl_dateIn value. (Only Display Rows 1,3) Ive tried to use MAX on the date and group by clause, but it combines rows, 2 & 3 together showing both the highest value of dateIn and dateOut. Any help will be appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Find Group size in active directory

    - by Ilya Biryukov
    Hey I have the following code. I get a directory entry for a user (strpath). And then I get the groups where the user is listed. How can I get the number of users in each group? DirectoryEntry myDE = new System.DirectoryServices.DirectoryEntry(strpath); object obGroups = myDE.Invoke("Groups"); foreach (object ob in (IEnumerable)obGroups) { DirectoryEntry obGpEntry = new DirectoryEntry(ob); GroupsListBox.Items.Add(obGpEntry.Name ); }

    Read the article

  • Best Practice: Accessing radio button group

    - by seth
    Looking for the best, standards compliant, cross browser compatible, forwards compatible way to access a group of radio buttons in the DOM (this is closely related to my other most recent post...), without the use of any external libraries. <input type="radio" value="1" name="myRadios" />One<br /> <input type="radio" value="2" name="myRadios" />Two<br /> I've read conflicting information on getElementsByName(), which seems like the proper way to do this, but I'm unclear if this is a standards compliant, forwards compatible solution. Perhaps there is a better way?

    Read the article

  • LINQ - group specific types of classes

    - by Nelson
    This question is similar to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2835192/linq-group-one-type-of-item but handled in a more generic way. I have a List that has various derived classes. I may have something like this: List<BaseClass> list = new List<BaseClass>() { new Class1(1), new Class2(1), new Class1(2), new Class3(1), new Class2(2), new Class4(1), new Class3(2) }; I am trying to use LINQ to semi-sort the list so that the natural order is maintained EXCEPT for certain classes which have base.GroupThisType == true. All classes with GroupThisType should be grouped together at the place that the first class of the same type occurs. Here is what the output should be like: List<BaseClass> list = new List<BaseClass>() { new Class1(1), new Class1(2), new Class2(1), new Class3(1), new Class3(2) new Class2(2), new Class4(1), };

    Read the article

  • lookahead and group

    - by Istao
    Hi, In Java, on a text like foo <on> bar </on> thing <on> again</on> now, I should want a regex with groups wich give me with a find "foo", "bar", empty string, then "thing", "again", "now". If I do (.*?)<on>(.*?)</on>(?!<on>), I get only two group (foo bar, thing again, and I've not the end "now"). if I do (.*?)<on>(.*?)</on>((?!<on>)) I get foo bar empty string, then thing again and empty string (here I should want "now"). Please what is the magical formula ? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Group and count in Rails

    - by alamodey
    I have this bit of code and I get an empty object. @results = PollRoles.find( :all, :select => 'option_id, count(*) count', :group => 'option_id', :conditions => ["poll_id = ?", @poll.id]) Is this the correct way of writing the query? I want a collection of records that have an option id and the number of times that option id is found in the PollRoles model. EDIT: This is how I''m iterating through the results: <% @results.each do |result| %> <% @option = Option.find_by_id(result.option_id) %> <%= @option.question %> <%= result.count %> <% end %>

    Read the article

  • Codeigniter view file looping query

    - by user2505513
    Right, I'm unsure about how to code my view file to generate following query results WITHOUT compromising the principles of mvc. Query in model: SELECT * FROM events GROUP BY country, area ORDER BY country, area View: <?php if (isset($query)):?> <?php foreach ($query as $row):?> <h2><?=$row->country?></h2> <h3><?=$row->area?></h3> <?php endforeach;?> <?php endif;?> I want the results to display: England North South West - utilising the GROUP BY parameter As opposed to: England North England South England West Has anybody any advice as to how to achieve this?

    Read the article

  • InfoPath Getting SharePoint Group Information

    - by anon
    I have an InfoPath form embedded in an aspx page on a SharePoint site. How do I bind the SharePoint user groups to a drop-down list on my form? What I've tried so far is to create a data connection to a web service (method GetGroupCollectionFromWeb) to pull the data. Next, I open the list box properties, select "Look up values from an external data source", select the data source, assign the entries, and I get the following error: "You must select a repeating group or field." What I don't understand is that since the method I am calling is called GetGroupCollectionFromWeb, isn't the return value a collection? And aren't collections repeating by definition? What am I missing, and is there a workaround? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • group by, order by, with join

    - by Scarface
    Hey guys, quick question, I have this query, and I am trying to get the latest comment for each topic and then sort those results in descending order (therefore one comment per topic). I have what I think should work, but my join always messes my results up. Somehow, it seems to have sorted the end results properly, but has not taken the latest comment from each topic instead it seems to have just taken a random comment. If anyone has any ideas, would really appreciate any advice SELECT * FROM comments JOIN topic ON topic.topic_id=comments.topic_id WHERE topic.creator='admin' GROUP BY comments.topic_id ORDER BY comments.time DESC table comments is structured like id time user message topic_id table topic is structured like topic_id subject_id topic_title creator timestamp description

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72  | Next Page >