Search Results

Search found 5625 results on 225 pages for 'sean foo'.

Page 65/225 | < Previous Page | 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72  | Next Page >

• How to append a tag after a link with BeaufitulSoup

  - by systempuntoout

  Starting from an Html input like this: <p> <a href="http://www.foo.com">this if foo</a> <a href="http://www.bar.com">this if bar</a> </p> using BeautifulSoup, i would like to change this Html in: <p> <a href="http://www.foo.com">this if foo</a><b>OK</b> <a href="http://www.bar.com">this if bar</a><b>OK</b> </p> Is it possible to do this using BeautifulSoup?

  Read the article

• CodeContracts: Possibly calling a method on a null reference

  - by dtb

  I'm having an argument with the CodeContracts static analysis tool. My code: class Foo { private static Foo instance = new Foo(); private string bar; public Foo() { bar = "Hello World"; } public static int BarLength() { return instance.bar.Length; // <<-- } } The tool tells me that instance.bar may be a null reference. I believe the opposite. Who is right? How can I prove it wrong?

  Read the article

• Is read-only auto-imlemented property possible?

  - by abatishchev

  Hello. I found a topic on MSDN that talks that yes, this is possible. I did a test that seems to break this statement: using System; namespace Test { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { Foo f = new Foo("1"); Console.WriteLine(f.Bar); // prints 1 f.Test("2"); Console.WriteLine(f.Bar);// successfully prints 2 } } class Foo { public Foo(string b) { this.Bar = b; } public string Bar { get; private set; } public void Test(string b) { // this would be impossible for readonly field! // next error would be occur: CS0191 or CS0191 // A readonly field cannot be assigned to (except in a constructor or a variable initializer) this.Bar = b; } } } Where am I wrong?

  Read the article

• Python: What does _("str") do?

  - by Rosarch

  I see this in the Django source code: description = _("Comma-separated integers") description = _("Date (without time)") What does it do? I try it in Python 3.1.3 and it fails: >>> foo = _("bar") Traceback (most recent call last): File "<pyshell#0>", line 1, in <module> foo = _("bar") NameError: name '_' is not defined No luck in 2.4.4 either: >>> foo = _("bar") Traceback (most recent call last): File "<pyshell#1>", line 1, in -toplevel- foo = _("bar") NameError: name '_' is not defined What's going on here?

  Read the article

• C++: Validate a pointer?

  - by Rosarch

  If I have a pointer, like char* foo, is there any way to determine if foo points to a valid location in memory? (So, foo is not NULL, and delete has not yet been called on it.)

  Read the article

• C++ - Creating a god object

  - by Greg Kritzman

  Hypothetical situation that I'm struggling to get my head past. HoldsFooBar.h: #include "foo.h" #include "bar.h" class HoldsFooBar{ foo F; bar B; }; foo.h: //includes? class foo{ HoldsFooBar *H; void Baz(); }; bar.h: //includes? class bar{ HoldsFooBar *H; void Qux(); }; I'm trying to get F to get a hold of B. In all other languages I've worked with, I would be able to H->B.Qux();, but I'm totally lost in C++. At the includes lines in foo.h and bar.h, it seems like my options are to forward-declare class HoldsFooBar; but then I can only access H, and F and B cannot see each other. Likewise, I can #include "HoldsFooBar.h" but because of my include guards, something ends up not getting linked properly, so the program doesn't run. Is what I'm trying to do even possible? Thank you very much! Any help would be appreciated!

  Read the article

• Lucene Search for documents that have a particular field?

  - by RP

  Lucene.Net - Is there a way to query for documents that contain a particular field. Lets say some of my documents have a field 'foo' and some do not. I want to find all documents that have the field 'foo' - regardless of what the value of foo is. How do I do this? Is it some sort of TermQuery?

  Read the article

• Strange macro declaration in C

  - by Andrey Atapin

  Exploring libusb-1.0.9 source code, I have found such line (./os/poll_windows.c:78): #define CHECK_INIT_POLLING do {if(!is_polling_set) init_polling();} while(0) As for me this is the same like: #define CHECK_INIT_POLLING if(!is_polling_set) init_polling(); Is there any reason to loop that expression? UPDATE: I couldn't still realize what'd be wrong after the answers, and the following example helped: #include <stdio.h> #define TEST if(test) foo(); #define TEST_DO do { if(test) foo(); } while(0) int test = 1; void foo() { printf("%s", "Foo called"); } int main(int argc, char** argv) { if(argc > 1) TEST_DO; /* LINE 12 */ else printf("%s", "skipping..."); return 0; } If you put TEST at line 12, a compiler will give an error "error: ‘else’ without a previous ‘if’". Hope, this will help someone.

  Read the article

• what to use in place of std::map::emplace?

  - by kfmfe04

  For containers such as std::map< std::string, std::unique_ptr< Foo >>, it looks like emplace() has yet to be implemented in stdc++ as of gcc 4.7.2. Unfortunately, I can't store Foo directly by value as it is an abstract super-class. As a simple, but inefficient, place-holder, I've just been using std::map< std::string, Foo* > in conjunction with a std::vector< std::unique_ptr< Foo >> for garbage collection. Do you have a interim solution that is more efficient and more easily replaced once emplace() is available?

  Read the article

• How do I return '' for an empty node's text() in XPath?

  - by joeforker

  <td></td><td>foo</td> I would like to return ['', 'foo'] but libxml's xpath //td/text() returns just ['foo']. How do I find the empty tag as '' instead of (not matched)?

  Read the article

• Why there is no static structs in C#, but static methods within them exists?

  - by sfedorov1982

  // OK struct MyStruct { static void Foo() { } } // Error static struct MyStruct { }

  Read the article

• How to do inline paste from system buffer in Vim?

  - by yetapb

  When pasting from the system buffer in a line like foo( someVal , <cursor is here>, someVal3); If I use "*p I get foo( someVal, , someVal3); <pasted text> If I use "*P I get <pasted text> foo( someVal, , someVal3); but I want foo( someVal, <pasted text>, someVal3 ); How can I get the result I want? edit If there is a newline in the buffer as @amardeep suspects, is there a way I can tell vim to ignore it?

  Read the article

• What kind of memory reclamation algorithm does MRI Ruby 1.8 use?

  - by Foo

  In other languages you have a number of possibilities usually for memory reclamation: Mark objects and then remove them Explicit retain and release Count references to objects Internal heap disposition How does Ruby work?

  Read the article

• R: How to replace elements of a data.frame?

  - by John

  I'm trying to replace elements of a data.frame containing "#N/A" with "NULL", and I'm running into problems: foo <- data.frame("day"= c(1, 3, 5, 7), "od" = c(0.1, "#N/A", 0.4, 0.8)) indices_of_NAs <- which(foo == "#N/A") replace(foo, indices_of_NAs, "NULL") Error in [<-.data.frame(*tmp*, list, value = "NULL") : new columns would leave holes after existing columns I think that the problem is that my index is treating the data.frame as a vector, but that the replace function is treating it differently somehow, but I'm not sure what the issue is?

  Read the article

• WCF: Is there a way to return an object that is able to execute on the server?

  - by mafutrct

  Coming from a Java background, this is the way I'm thinking: The server provides an object to the client. This object should be able to execute on the server. Server: private string _S = "A"; public interface IFoo { void Bar(); } private class Foo : IFoo { void Bar() { _S = "B";} } public IFoo GetFoo() { return new Foo(); } Client: IFoo foo = serverChannel.GetFoo(); foo.Bar(); Is this possible? Or is my understanding wrong and this is not how it works in WCF? What would be a better design?

  Read the article

• Prototype with a callback problem

  - by Lisio

  function Foo() { this.bar = false; } Foo.prototype={ onLoad: function() { this.bar=true; }, create: function(id) { SomeClass.someMethod({ id: id, onWorkIsDone: this.onLoad }); } }; var temp=new Foo(); temp.create(); This sample has a logic error in string 'onWorkIsDone: this.onLoad'. What I have to place instead of 'this.onLoad' to make SomeClass call exactly the temp.onLoad method when it finishes it's work?

  Read the article

• Reload Method or Object in IDLE

  - by GSto

  when using idle, I know you can reload a module if it's changed like this: import foo reload(foo) if I only import part of a module, is there a way to reload it in a similar matter? from foo import bar

  Read the article

• Convert to lowercase in a mod_rewrite rule.

  - by dreeves

  I would like URLs like server.com/foo to be case-insensitive. But server.com/foo actually gets mod_rewrite'd to server.com/somedir/foo (Assume that all the files in "somedir" are lower case.) So the question is, how to accomplish a mod_rewrite like the following: RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/?$ somedir/convert_to_lowercase($1)

  Read the article

• Is it worth setting pointers to NULL in a destructor?

  - by Rob

  Imagine I have a class that allocates memory (forget about smart pointers for now): class Foo { public: Foo() : bar(new Bar) { } ~Foo() { delete bar; } void doSomething() { bar->doSomething(); } private: Bar* bar; }; As well as deleting the objects in the destructor is it also worth setting them to NULL? I'm assuming that setting the pointer to NULL in the destructor of the example above is a waste of time.

  Read the article

• How do I remove unnecessary options from a select field in a Drupal form?

  - by thismax

  I'm using the better_exposed_filters module to create a set of exposed filters for a view. One of the filters is being displayed as a select field, and I would like the field to only display options that are actually associated with content in the database. Currently, I am doing this using the hook_form_alter() method. For simplification, in the following example the field is called 'foo' and the content type with that field is called 'bar': function my_module_form_alter(&$form, $form_state, $form_id) { // Get all the values of foo that matter $resource = db_query('select distinct field_foo_value from {content_type_bar}'); $foo = array(); while($row = db_fetch_object($resource)) { $foo[$row->field_foo_value] = $row->field_foo_value; } $form['foo']['#options'] = $manufacturers; } This works great -- the form displays only the options I want to display. Unfortunately, the view doesn't actually display anything initially and I also get the following error message: An illegal choice has been detected. Please contact the site administrator. After I filter options with the form once, everything seems to work fine. Does anyone know how I can solve this problem? I'm open to an entirely different way of weeding out filter options, if need be, or a way that I can figure out how to address that error.

  Read the article

• C++: Assign L"" string to WCHAR?

  - by Rosarch

  I have a WCHAR: WCHAR foo[200]; I want to copy values into it: if (condition) { foo = L"bar"; } else { foo = L"odp"; } What is the best way to do this?

  Read the article

• Rails Scope for association of 0 size.

  - by MissingHandle

  I'm having trouble figuring out the scope method for all the Foos that have no Bars. That is: class Foo < ActiveRecord::Base has_may :bars end class Bar < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :foo end I'd like to write a scope method that returns me all the foos that have no bars. Something like: class Foo < ActiveRecord::Base has_may :bars scope :has_no_bars, includes(:bars).where("COUNT(foo.bars) = 0") end But I don't understand the appropriate syntax. Any help? Happy to use a MetaWhere solution if easier.

  Read the article

• what's this jquery syntax?

  - by all-R

  I see that quite often in some Jquery plugins $('#foo').myPlugin({ foo: 'bar', bar: 'foo' }); I'm talking about the {} in the .myPlugin() part. I see quite often anonymous functions like .click(function(){ }); but the above syntax looks different thanks for your help!

  Read the article

• php array_filter without key preservation

  - by pistacchio

  Hi, if i filter an array with array_filter to eliminate null values, keys are preserved and this generated "holes" in the array. Eg: The filtered version of [0] => 'foo' [1] => null [2] => 'bar' is [0] => 'foo' [2] => 'bar' How can i get, instead [0] => 'foo' [1] => 'bar' ? Thanks

  Read the article

• how to get all objects of a given type in javascript

  - by FenchKiss Dev

  I want to retrieve all objects (not DOM elements) of a given type created with the "new" keyword. Is it possible ? function foo(name) { this.name = name; } var obj = new foo(); How can I retrieve a reference to all the foo objects ?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72  | Next Page >