Search Results

Search found 27342 results on 1094 pages for 'sql denali'.

Page 677/1094 | < Previous Page | 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684  | Next Page >

  • Problems with mysql syntax

    - by user368453
    Hello everyone !! I´m trying to create a trigger on MySQL but I´m having a sintaxe problem, which I was not able to find. If someone more experient could help me it would be great (it´s the first time I use MySQL!)... The reason why I´m creating this trigger is for deleting all the orphan "labels", which has a many-to-many relation with "service_descriptor" (this two entities are linked by service_labels). The code I have is: CREATE TRIGGER trg_delete_orphan_label AFTER DELETE FOR EACH ROW ON restdb.service_labels DELETE FROM restdb.labels WHERE EXISTS (SELECT * FROM old D LEFT_JOIN restdb.service_labels SL ON SL.id_label = D.id_label AND D.id_service = SL.id_service WHERE SL.id_label IS NULL restdb.labels.id = D.SL.id_label ); Thanks in advance !

    Read the article

  • R equivalent of SELECT DISTINCT on two or more fields/variables

    - by wahalulu
    Say I have a dataframe df with two or more columns, is there an easy way to use unique() or other R function to create a subset of unique combinations of two or more columns? I know I can use sqldf() and write an easy "SELECT DISTINCT var1, var2, ... varN" query, but I am looking for an R way of doing this. It occurred to me to try ftable coerced to a dataframe and use the field names, but I also get the cross tabulations of combinations that don't exist in the dataset: uniques <- as.data.frame(ftable(df$var1, df$var2))

    Read the article

  • conditions on count in a select

    - by Luca Romagnoli
    Hi, i have a table like this: Table(MissioneID, Type) Type can be 1,2 or 3 i have to count missions by type value: ex. if table's content is: MissioneID Type 1,1 1,2 1,1 2,3 1,2 The result of query is MissioneID,Count1,Count2,Count3 1, 2,2,0 2,0,0,1 How can i do? thanks

    Read the article

  • Limiting Subscriptions to be emailed using SSRS

    - by Graeme
    Currently, our system will do a "foreach" over all Subscriptions which are returned from the ListSubscriptions method of ReportingService and fire a Timed Subscription event so that they receive the report as an email. In our dev environment, I don't want every subscription of these reports to be sent out when we are testing. Is there a way I can create a new subscription with my own email address being used so that I receive the report? The temp subscription could then be deleted after sending. Any ideas on how to do this?

    Read the article

  • limiting mysql results by range of a specific key INCLUDING DUPLICATES

    - by aVC
    I have a query SELECT p.*, m.*, (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM newPhotoonAlert n WHERE n.userIDfor='$id' AND n.threadID=p.threadID and n.seen='0') AS unReadCount FROM posts p JOIN myMembers m ON m.id = p.user_id LEFT JOIN following f ON (p.user_id = f.user_id AND f.follower_id='$id' AND f.request='0' AND f.status='1') JOIN myMembers searcher ON searcher.id = '$id' WHERE ((f.follower_id = searcher.id) OR m.id='$id') AND p.flagged <'5' ORDER BY p.threadID DESC,p.positionID It brings result as expected but I want to add Another CLAUSE to limit the results. Say a sample (minimal shown) set of data looks like this with the above query. threadID postID positionID url 564 1254 2 a.com 564 1245 1 a1.com 541 1215 3 b1.com 541 1212 2 b2.com 541 1210 1 b3.com 523 745 1 c1.com 435 689 2 d2.com 435 688 1 a4.com 256 345 1 s3.com 164 316 1 f1.com . . I want to get ROWS corresponding to 2 DISTINCT threadIDs starting from MAX, but I want to include duplicates as well. Something like AND p.threadID IN (Select just Two of all threadIDs currently selected, but include duplicate rows) So my result should be threadID postID positionID url 564 1254 2 a.com 564 1245 1 a1.com 541 1215 3 b1.com 541 1212 2 b2.com 541 1210 1 b3.com

    Read the article

  • IS NULL vs = NULL in where clause + MSSQL

    - by Nev_Rahd
    Hello How to check a value IS NULL [or] = @param (where @param is null) Ex: Select column1 from Table1 where column2 IS NULL = works fine If I want to replace comparing value (IS NULL) with @param. How can this be done Select column1 from Table1 where column2 = @param = this works fine until @param got some value in it and if is null never finds a record. How can this achieve?

    Read the article

  • Most efficient way to Update with Linq2Sql

    - by pranay
    can I update my employee record as given in below function or i have to make query of employee collection first and than i update data public int updateEmployee(App3_EMPLOYEE employee) { DBContextDataContext db = new DBContextDataContext(); db.App3_EMPLOYEEs.Attach(employee); db.SubmitChanges(); return employee.PKEY; } or i have to do this public int updateEmployee(App3_EMPLOYEE employee) { DBContextDataContext db = new DBContextDataContext(); App3_EMPLOYEE emp = db.App3_EMPLOYEEs.Single(e => e.PKEY == employee.PKEY); db.App3_EMPLOYEEs.Attach(employee,emp); db.SubmitChanges(); return employee.PKEY; } But i dont want to use second option is there any efficient way to update data

    Read the article

  • dbo in SqlServer

    - by ala
    I'm converting database from Teradata to SqlServer. I've noticed all tables and procedures are named by the prefix "dbo." (e.g. "dbo.Table1"). I would like to know if and how I can get rid of "dbo" because it would make the conversion task a lot more easier.

    Read the article

  • Oracle query with LOWER

    - by Nickolodeon
    Hi. Why this returns 0 rows SELECT GARTUSERID, USER_CODE, UNITID, RANKCODE, RANKID, FIO, LOGINNAME, START_DATE, EXPIR_DATE, NOTE, POSITION, ISCHGPASSWORD, IS_EXPIRDATE, IS_BLOCKED, ROW_ID FROM ACONTROL.GARTUSERS WHERE LOWER(LOGINNAME)=LOWER(:LOGIN) AND ROW_ID=:MD5PSWD and this returns 1 row (as I wanted for the first query)? SELECT GARTUSERID, USER_CODE, UNITID, RANKCODE, RANKID, FIO, LOGINNAME, START_DATE, EXPIR_DATE, NOTE, POSITION, ISCHGPASSWORD, IS_EXPIRDATE, IS_BLOCKED, ROW_ID FROM ACONTROL.GARTUSERS WHERE LOGINNAME=:LOGIN AND ROW_ID=:MD5PSWD

    Read the article

  • Firebird 2.1 + EXISTS = query bug?

    - by Atlas
    Using Delphi 2009 + Firebird 2.1.3. Database is ODS 11.1, default char set is UTF8. My prepared query is as follows: SELECT a.po_id, a.po_no FROM purchase_order a WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM sales_order_item z1 JOIN purchase_order_item z2 ON z2.so_item_id = z1.so_item_id AND z2.po_id = a.po_id WHERE z1.so_id = :soid) ORDER BY a.po_no Now when I loop this say 1000 times because I have 1000 x so_id, the CPU usage get at 100% for FBSERVER.EXE Anyone encountered this problem?

    Read the article

  • Help doing a dynamic sort?

    - by Kevin
    I have a notifications table which contains different types of notifications for different events. Inside the table is a notifications_type:string column that contains the type of notification, i.e. "foo" or "bar" or "oof" I want the user to be able to select what notifications they want to display, so there are checkboxes below the result that correspond to prefs_display_foo:boolean, prefs_display_bar:boolean in the User model. What is an elegant way for me to set the :conditions in the find to properly display the sorted results? Also, currently I have it as a method in the user, but how would I do it as a has_many :notifications, :conditions = .....

    Read the article

  • Query to check the consistency of records

    - by orunner
    I have four tables TableA: id1 id2 id3 value TableB: id1 desc TableC: id2 desc TableD: id3 desc What I need to do is to check if all combinations of id1 id2 id3 from table B C and D exist in the TableA. In other words, table A should contain all possible combinations of id1 id2 and id3 which are stored in the other three tables.

    Read the article

  • Copying Primary key to another field in Access.

    - by BashLover
    Hey, I'm struggling to copy the Primary Key to another field in Access. This is irrelevant , but clarifying on what I'm comparing. ... WHERE Tunniste=" & [Tarkiste] & "" Tunniste = Primary Key , Autonumber , ID (Generated by Access.) Tarkiste = This is the field I want to copy it to compare it. I'm open to suggestions, I've already try'ed with Form_Load, using the following code. Private Sub Form_Load() DoCmd.RunSQL "UPDATE Korut SET [Tarkiste]=('" & Tunniste & "');" End Sub But this copied the same key to all the entries in "Tarkiste" field. In simplicity I want 1:1 copy of field "Tunniste" to "Tarkiste" , whichever method it takes. Started from this question. File Picker Replaces All Rows With The Same Choice.

    Read the article

  • MySQL: group by and IF statement

    - by notset
    By default, parent_id = 0. I want to select all records with parent_id = 0 and only the last ones with parent_id 0. I tried this, but it didn't work: SELECT * FROM `articles` IF `parent_id` > 0 THEN GROUP BY `parent_id` HAVING COUNT(`parent_id`) >= 1 END; ORDER BY `time` DESC What could be the solution?

    Read the article

  • Creating a multi-row "table" as part of a SELECT

    - by Chad Birch
    I'm not really sure how to describe my question (thus the awful title), but it's related to this recent question. The problem would be easily solved if there was some way for me to create a "table" with 4 rows as part of my SELECT (to use with NOT IN or MINUS). What I mean is, I can do this: SELECT 1, 2, 3, 4; And will receive one row from the database: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | But is there any way to receive the following (without using UNION, I don't really want a query that's potentially thousands of lines long with a long list)? | 1 | | 2 | | 3 | | 4 |

    Read the article

  • Counting the instances of customers

    - by Mikae Combarado
    Say that I have a table with one column named CustomerId. The example of the instance of this table is : CustomerId 14 12 11 204 14 204 I want to write a query that counts the number of occurences of customer IDs. At the end, I would like to have a result like this : CustomerId NumberOfOccurences 14 2 12 1 11 1 204 2 14 1 I cannot think of a way to do this.

    Read the article

  • Errors with parameter datatype in PostgreSql query

    - by John
    Im trying to execute a query to postgresql using the following code. It's written in C/C++ and I keep getting the following error when declaring a cursor: DECLARE CURSOR failed: ERROR: could not determine data type of parameter $1 Searching on here and on google, I can't find a solution. Can anyone find where I have made and error and why this is happening? thanks! void searchdb( PGconn *conn, char* name, char* offset ) { // Will hold the number of field in table int nFields; // Start a transaction block PGresult *res = PQexec(conn, "BEGIN"); if (PQresultStatus(res) != PGRES_COMMAND_OK) { printf("BEGIN command failed: %s", PQerrorMessage(conn)); PQclear(res); exit_nicely(conn); } // Clear result PQclear(res); printf("BEGIN command - OK\n"); //set the values to use const char *values[3] = {(char*)name, (char*)RESULTS_LIMIT, (char*)offset}; //calculate the lengths of each of the values int lengths[3] = {strlen((char*)name), sizeof(RESULTS_LIMIT), sizeof(offset)}; //state which parameters are binary int binary[3] = {0, 0, 1}; res = PQexecParams(conn, "DECLARE emprec CURSOR for SELECT name, id, 'Events' as source FROM events_basic WHERE name LIKE '$1::varchar%' UNION ALL " " SELECT name, fsq_id, 'Venues' as source FROM venues_cache WHERE name LIKE '$1::varchar%' UNION ALL " " SELECT name, geo_id, 'Cities' as source FROM static_cities WHERE name LIKE '$1::varchar%' OR FIND_IN_SET('$1::varchar%', alternate_names) != 0 LIMIT $2::int4 OFFSET $3::int4", 3, //number of parameters NULL, //ignore the Oid field values, //values to substitute $1 and $2 lengths, //the lengths, in bytes, of each of the parameter values binary, //whether the values are binary or not 0); //we want the result in text format // Fetch rows from table if (PQresultStatus(res) != PGRES_COMMAND_OK) { printf("DECLARE CURSOR failed: %s", PQerrorMessage(conn)); PQclear(res); exit_nicely(conn); } // Clear result PQclear(res); res = PQexec(conn, "FETCH ALL in emprec"); if (PQresultStatus(res) != PGRES_TUPLES_OK) { printf("FETCH ALL failed"); PQclear(res); exit_nicely(conn); } // Get the field name nFields = PQnfields(res); // Prepare the header with table field name printf("\nFetch record:"); printf("\n********************************************************************\n"); for (int i = 0; i < nFields; i++) printf("%-30s", PQfname(res, i)); printf("\n********************************************************************\n"); // Next, print out the record for each row for (int i = 0; i < PQntuples(res); i++) { for (int j = 0; j < nFields; j++) printf("%-30s", PQgetvalue(res, i, j)); printf("\n"); } PQclear(res); // Close the emprec res = PQexec(conn, "CLOSE emprec"); PQclear(res); // End the transaction res = PQexec(conn, "END"); // Clear result PQclear(res); }

    Read the article

  • Find Consecutive Rows & Calculate Duration

    - by MannyKo
    I have a set a of data that tells me if a couple of systems are available or not every 5 or 15 minutes increments. For now, the time increment shouldn't matter. The data looks like this: Status Time System_ID T 10:00 S01 T 10:15 S01 F 10:30 S01 F 10:45 S01 F 11:00 S01 T 11:15 S01 T 11:30 S01 F 11:45 S01 F 12:00 S01 F 12:15 S01 T 12:30 S01 F 10:00 S02 F 10:15 S02 F 10:30 S02 F 10:45 S02 F 11:00 S02 T 11:15 S02 T 11:30 S02 I want to create a view that tells when a system is NOT available (i.e. when it is F), from what time, to what time, and duration which is to - from. Desired results: System_ID From To Duration S01 10:30 11:00 00:30 S01 11:45 12:15 00:30 S02 10:00 11:00 01:00 Here is the script data: DROP SCHEMA IF EXISTS Sys_data CASCADE; CREATE SCHEMA Sys_data; CREATE TABLE test_data ( status BOOLEAN, dTime TIME, sys_ID VARCHAR(10), PRIMARY KEY (dTime, sys_ID) ); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (TRUE, '10:00:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (TRUE, '10:15:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '10:30:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '10:45:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '11:00:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (TRUE, '11:15:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (TRUE, '11:30:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '11:45:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '12:00:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '12:15:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (TRUE, '12:30:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '10:00:00', 'S02'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '10:15:00', 'S02'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '10:30:00', 'S02'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '10:45:00', 'S02'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '11:00:00', 'S02'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (TRUE, '11:15:00', 'S02'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (TRUE, '11:30:00', 'S02'); Thank you in advance!

    Read the article

  • wanted to get all dates in mysql result

    - by PankajK
    I have mysql table called user(id, name, join_on) join on is a date field what I want is to show in each day how many uses has been created I can use group by but it will only give me the dates when users get added like if date 4/12/10 5 users added 4/13/10 2 users added 4/15/10 7 users added here date 4/14/10 is missing and I want listing of all dates in one month. I have one solution for it by creating another table only for adding date and that table will left join my users table on join_on and will give total result but I don't want to do that as for creating that I need to create and add entries in date table please suggest the different approach for doing so. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Best way to get distinct values from large table

    - by derivation
    I have a db table with about 10 or so columns, two of which are month and year. The table has about 250k rows now, and we expect it to grow by about 100-150k records a month. A lot of queries involve the month and year column (ex, all records from march 2010), and so we frequently need to get the available month and year combinations (ie do we have records for april 2010?). A coworker thinks that we should have a separate table from our main one that only contains the months and years we have data for. We only add records to our main table once a month, so it would just be a small update on the end of our scripts to add the new entry to this second table. This second table would be queried whenever we need to find the available month/year entries on the first table. This solution feels kludgy to me and a violation of DRY. What do you think is the correct way of solving this problem? Is there a better way than having two tables?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684  | Next Page >