Search Results

Search found 9764 results on 391 pages for 'cross join'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 68/391 | < Previous Page | 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75  | Next Page >

  • query SQL how to check all records from a three table join share the same value

    - by Stefano
    Hello Since i'm a poor sql developer, i need support to write a sql query for the following scenario (just a simplified example of my situation): i've got 3 tables, say employe table,department table and companybranch table. the dept column , on the employe table is a fk on the department table; the branch column on the department table is a fk on the companybranch table. Finally more employee are "marked" with the same value . There's a way to select all employes with the same "mark" and, in the same query, check that they work in the same company branch ? thank you in advance Stefano

    Read the article

  • How can join two django querysets in one?

    - by diegueus9
    I need order a Queryset by date in desc order, but i need put in the end the objects at the end, I do this: qs1 = Model.objects.exclude(date=None).order_by('-date') qs2 = Model.objects.filter(date=None).order_by('-date') and my list is: l = list(qs1)+list(qs2) There is a more efficiently way for this?

    Read the article

  • Storing a set of criteria in another table

    - by bendataclear
    I have a large table with sales data, useful data below: RowID Date Customer Salesperson Product_Type Manufacturer Quantity Value 1 01-06-2004 James Ian Taps Tap Ltd 200 £850 2 02-06-2004 Apple Fran Hats Hats Inc 30 £350 3 04-06-2004 James Lawrence Pencils ABC Ltd 2000 £980 ... Many rows later... ... 185352 03-09-2012 Apple Ian Washers Tap Ltd 600 £80 I need to calculate a large set of targets from table containing values different types, target table is under my control and so far is like: TargetID Year Month Salesperson Target_Type Quantity 1 2012 7 Ian 1 6000 2 2012 8 James 2 2000 3 2012 9 Ian 2 6500 At present I am working out target types using a view of the first table which has a lot of extra columns: SELECT YEAR(Date) , MONTH(Date) , Salesperson , Quantity , CASE WHEN Manufacturer IN ('Tap Ltd','Hats Inc') AND Product_Type = 'Hats' THEN True ELSE False END AS IsType1 , CASE WHEN Manufacturer = 'Hats Inc' AND Product_Type IN ('Hats','Coats') THEN True ELSE False END AS IsType2 ... ... , CASE WHEN Manufacturer IN ('Tap Ltd','Hats Inc') AND Product_Type = 'Hats' THEN True ELSE False END AS IsType24 , CASE WHEN Manufacturer IN ('Tap Ltd','Hats Inc') AND Product_Type = 'Hats' THEN True ELSE False END AS IsType25 FROM SalesTable WHERE [some stuff here] This is horrible to read/debug and I hate it!! I've tried a few different ways of simplifying this but have been unable to get it to work. The closest I have come is to have a third table holding the definition of the types with the values for each field and the type number, this can be joined to the tables to give me the full values but I can't work out a way to cope with multiple values for each field. Finally the question: Is there a standard way this can be done or an easier/neater method other than one column for each type of target? I know this is a complex problem so if anything is unclear please let me know. Edit - What I need to get: At the very end of the process I need to have targets displayed with actual sales: Type Year Month Salesperson TargetQty ActualQty 2 2012 8 James 2000 2809 2 2012 9 Ian 6500 6251 Each row of the sales table could potentially satisfy 8 of the types. Some more points: I have 5 different columns that need to be defined against the targets (or set to NULL to include any value) I have between 30 and 40 different types that need to be defined, several of the columns could contain as many as 10 different values For point 2, if I am using a row for each permutation of values, 2 columns with 10 values each would give me 100 rows for each sales person for each month which is a lot but if this is the only way to define multiple values I will have to do this. Sorry if this makes no sense!

    Read the article

  • Address Match Key Algorithm

    - by sestocker
    I have a list of addresses in two separate tables that are slightly off that I need to be able to match. For example, the same address can be entered in multiple ways: 110 Test St 110 Test St. 110 Test Street Although simple, you can imagine the situation in more complex scenerios. I am trying to develop a simple algorithm that will be able to match the above addresses as a key. For example. the key might be "11TEST" - first two of 110, first two of Test and first two of street variant. A full match key would also include first 5 of the zipcode as well so in the above example, the full key might look like "11TEST44680". I am looking for ideas for an effective algorithm or resources I can look at for considerations when developing this. Any ideas can be pseudo code or in your language of choice. We are only concerned with US addresses. In fact, we are only looking at addresses from 250 zip codes from Ohio and Michigan. We also do not have access to any postal software although would be open to ideas for cost effective solutions (it would essentially be a one time use). Please be mindful that this is an initial dump of data from a government source so suggestions of how users can clean it are helpful as I build out the application but I would love to have the best initial I possibly can by being able to match addresses as best as possible.

    Read the article

  • Join column with different collation issue

    - by George2
    Hello everyone, I am using SQL Server 2005. I have two tables, and they are using different collations. It is not allowed to concatenate columns from tables with different collations, for example the following SQL is not allowed, select table1column1 + table2column2 from ... My question is, why concatenation of two columns from different collations is not allowed from database engine design perspective? I do not know why collation will impact results, the result is just concatenating strings -- should be simple enough and not dependent on collation... thanks in advance, George

    Read the article

  • Rows dropping when I try to join data from two tables

    - by blcArmadillo
    I have a fairly simple query I'm try to write. If I run the following query: SELECT parts.id, parts.type_id FROM parts WHERE parts.type_id=1 OR parts.type_id=2 OR parts.type_id=4 ORDER BY parts.type_id; I get all the rows I expect to be returned. Now when I try to grab the parent_unit from another table with the following query six rows suddenly drop out of the result: SELECT parts.id, parts.type_id, sp.parent_unit FROM parts, serialized_parts sp WHERE (parts.type_id=1 OR parts.type_id=2 OR parts.type_id=4) AND sp.parts_id = parts.id ORDER BY parts.type_id In the past I've never really dealt with ORs in my queries so maybe I'm just doing it wrong. That said I'm guessing it's just a simple mistake. Let me know if you need sample data and I'll post some. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How to make custom join query with Django ?

    - by xRobot
    I have these 2 models: genre = ( ('D', 'Dramatic'), ('T', 'Thriller'), ('L', 'Love'), ) class Book(models.Model): title = models.CharField(max_length=100) genre = models.CharField(max_length=1, choices=genre) class Author(models.Model): user = models.ForeignKey(User, unique=True) born = models.DateTimeField('born') book = models.ForeignKey(Book) I need to retrieve first_name and last_name of all authors of dramatic's books. How can I do this in django ?

    Read the article

  • Grails - Self Join

    - by WaZ
    Hi, When I write the following class, I get the following compilation error: could not resolve property How can I achive the following: class Employee{ String Name String Email Employee Manager static hasMany = [desginations:Designation] static constraints = { Name(unique:true) Email(unique:true) } Thanks, Much appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Join collection of objects into comma-separated string

    - by Helen Toomik
    In many places in our code we have collections of objects, from which we need to create a comma-separated list. The type of collection varies: it may be a DataTable from which we need a certain column, or a List<Customer>, etc. Now we loop through the collection and use string concatenation, for example: string text = ""; string separator = ""; foreach (DataRow row in table.Rows) { text += separator + row["title"]; separator = ", "; } Is there a better pattern for this? Ideally I would like an approach we could reuse by just sending in a function to get the right field/property/column from each object.

    Read the article

  • MongoDB-PHP: JOIN-like query

    - by mdm414
    Here are the objects: courses { "name" : "Biology", "_id" : ObjectId("4b0552b0f0da7d1eb6f126a1") } students { "name" : "Joe", "classes" : [ { "$ref" : "courses", "$id" : ObjectId("4b0552b0f0da7d1eb6f126a1") } ], "_id" : ObjectId("4b0552e4f0da7d1eb6f126a2") } Using the PHP Mongo Class, how do I get all the students that has a biology course? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Transitive SQL query on same table

    - by MiKu
    Hey. consider d following table and data... in_timestamp | out_timestamp | name | in_id | out_id | in_server | out_server | status timestamp1 | timestamp2 | data1 |id1 | id2 | others-server1 | my-server1 | success timestamp2 | timestamp3 | data1 | id2 | id3 | my-server1 | my-server2 | success timestamp3 | timestamp4 | data1 | id3 | id4 | my-server2 | my-server3 | success timestamp4 | timestamp5 | data1 | id4 | id5 | my-server3 | others-server2 | success the above data represent log of a execution flow of some data across servers. e.g. some data has flowed from some 'outside-server1' to bunch of 'my-servers' and finally to destined 'others-server2'. Question : 1) I need to give this log in representable form to client where he doesn't need to know anything about the bunch of 'my-servers'. All i am supposed to give is timestamp of the data entered my infrastructure and when it left; drilling down to following info. in_timestamp (of 'others_server1' to 'my-server1') out_timestamp (of 'my-server3' to 'others-server2') name status I want to write sql for the same! Can someone help? NOTE : there might not be 3 'my-servers' all the time. It differs from situation to situation. e.g. there might be 4 'my-server' involved for, say, data2! 2) Are there any other alternatives to SQL? I mean stored procs/etc? 3) Optimizations? (The records are huge in number! As of now, it is around 5 million a day. And we are supposed to show records that are upto a week old.) In advance, THANKS FOR THE HELP! :)

    Read the article

  • SQL Join Problem

    - by Harley
    Table one contains ID|Name 1 Mary 2 John Table two contains ID|Color 1 Red 1 Blue 2 Green 2 Blue 2 Black I want to end up with is ID|Name|Red|Blue|Green|Black 1 Mary    Y      Y 2 John            Y        Y       Y Thanks for and help.

    Read the article

  • DB2 SQL count in join or where clause

    - by Pat
    This is probably an amateur question but I'm an amateur ! ;o) I have several tables: Account table, Officer table, Location table, Web table... The Officer table doesn't give me the number of officers per account. I need to retrieve only the accounts that have more than 20 officers. Should I use the COUNT ? If so, how ? Your help is greatly appreciated. Thanks. Pat

    Read the article

  • Left Join 3 Tables and Show True or False on Empty Cells

    - by Jason Shultz
    Ok, this may be confusing so I hope I explain it correctly. I have 4 tables: business photos video category I want to display "featured" businesses on the home page (or elsewhere) and I want to show a Yes or No in the table row based upon whether or not there are photos or videos for that business. Example: Joes Crab Shack has no videos or photos but is featured. So, when his row is echoed out it will show the Business Name and Business Owner but there will be no data in the photo or video cells thus in the video and photos column it will say No. Otherwise, if the opposite was true, it would say Yes. Here's my pastebin

    Read the article

  • mysql prevent displaying a row ONE which has reference in another row TWO but no reference in row THREE

    - by Jayapal Chandran
    I have a table like the following id | name | pid 1 | sam | NULL 2 | sams ref | 1 3 | pam | NULL For the first time the first row gets inserted which will have pid as null I insert a row which is related to the first row and then i insert a row which is new and which may be referred by another row in future. now i want only the third row to be displayed and not the first and second row as the second row contains the reference of first row. so if any row has a reference to another row then both the rows should not be displayed. Only rows which is not having any reference should be displayed. BESIDES, IS IT A GOOD PRACTICE? PLEASE ADVICE ON THIS. Edited When i updated in server the query is always giving empty result. here is what i have and this one When pid is NULL then that row should appear but when another entry in the same table with pid as its parent id or any other rows id appears then both the rows should not appear. so if any pid has been referred then both the rows should not appear. here only one row will refer another row and not more than that. in my localhost i have mysql version 5.0.1 or something like that but when i installed xampp in another system it had 5.5 and in the live server it was 5.3 so in version around 5.0 the query is returning rows but in higher versions it is returning empty rows. so now i this case how to make a query?

    Read the article

  • Many-to-Many Relationships in MySQL

    - by Kaji
    I've been reading up on foreign keys and joins recently, and have been pleasantly surprised that many of the basic concepts are things I'm already putting into practice. For example, with one project I'm currently working on, I'm organizing word lists, and have a table for the sets, like so: `words` Table `word_id` `headword` `category_id` `categories` Table `category_id` `category_name` Now, generally speaking this would be a one-to-many relationship, with several words being placed under a single category with the foreign key category_id. Let's assume for a moment, however, that a user chooses to add another category to a word, making it many-to-many—Is there a way to set up my words table to handle additional categories for words without creating extra columns like category_2, category_3, etc.?

    Read the article

  • What are appropriate ways to represent relationships between people in a database table?

    - by Emilio
    I've got a table of people - an ID primary key and a name. In my application, people can have 0 or more real-world relationships with other people, so Jack might "work for" Jane and Tom might "replace" Tony and Bob might "be an employee of" Rob and Bob might also "be married to" Mary. What's the best way to represent this in the database? A many to many intersect table? A series of self joins? A relationship table with one row per relationship pair and type, where I insert records for the relationship in both directions?

    Read the article

  • SQL Query syntax, I want to use INNER JOIN

    - by amol kadam
    Hi . I'm working on a windows application project using front end "vb.net" & back end "Ms Access" I have problem in wrinting sql query Actually there are 5 tables Transaction,items,itemtitle,itemtype & userinfo. check the following query & with this referance if u get idea then plz change in correct query Thanking You SELECT TRANSACTIONS.ACCESSIONNO AS ACCESSIONNO,TRANSACTIONS.TYPEID, TRANSACTIONS.CHECKOUTDATE AS CHECKOUTDATE,ITEMTITLE.ITEMTITLE, TRANSACTIONS.CHECKEDOUTBY, USERINFO.FULLNAME_ENG, USERINFO.FULLNAME_MAR, TRANSACTIONS.ACCOUNTNO, ITEMTYPE.TYPES_MAR, ITEMTYPE.TYPES_ENG FROM TRANSACTIONS,ITEMTYPE, ITEMTITLE, USERINFO WHERE TRANSACTIONS.ACCOUNTNO=USERINFO.ACCOUNTNO AND TRANSACTIONS.ACCESSIONNO=ITEMS.ACCESSIONNO AND ITEMS.ITEMTITLEID=ITEMTITLE.ITEMTITLEID AND TRANSACTIONS.TYPEID=ITEMTYPE.TYPEID AND TRANSACTIONS.STATUS='Enabled'

    Read the article

  • HABTM and belongsTo at the same join, cakePhp

    - by Cynthia
    Hello everyone. I have a model Fix with a relationship HABTM Device model. Device model has a belongsTo to Device_type model, like this, for only getting the device type name: var $belongsTo = array('Device_type'=>array('fields'=>'name')); So, I need every Fix, its devices and its Device_types. When I make a Fix->find('all', array('recursive' => 2)) I expect to get every Device related to Fix (this works ok) and ALSO for every device, its Device_type.name (which is not working). This is what I get instead for every Device in the result (an empty array): ["Device_type"]=> array(0) { } Besides this, when I make this query for testing: Fix->Device->find('all'), it returns the current Device_type.names for every device related to fixes, which means models are related propertly. Any help? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How to make an entity out of a join table without primary key

    - by tputkonen
    I'm trying to generate JPA entities out of an existing database having an "interesting" design. Database has a table called UserSet, which can have links to several other UserSets. There is a one to many relation between UserSets and LinkedUserSets. LinkedUserSets also has one to one relation to UserSets. I tried to generate a JPA Entity out of the database structure using Dali JPA Tools. The resulting entity Linkeduserset misses @Id or @EmbeddedId annotation and thus failes to compile. As the resulting entity contains only two @JoinColumns (which cannot be marked as @Id), I have not so far found a way around this issue. Database structure can not be modified in any way. Is there a way to overcome this somehow? Relevant pars of create table statements: CREATE TABLE `LinkedUserSets` ( `UsrSetID` INT(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' , `ChildID` INT(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' , CONSTRAINT `fk_LinkedUserSets_UserSet1` FOREIGN KEY (`UsrSetID` ) REFERENCES `UserSet` (`UsrSetID` )); CREATE TABLE `UserSet` ( `UsrSetID` INT(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT , PRIMARY KEY (`UsrSetID`), CONSTRAINT `fk_UserSet_LinkedUserSets1` FOREIGN KEY (`UsrSetID` ) REFERENCES `LinkedUserSets` (`ChildID` )); Generated entities: @Entity @Table(name="linkedusersets") public class Linkeduserset { //bi-directional many-to-one association to Userset @ManyToOne @JoinColumn(name="UsrSetID") private Userset userset1; //bi-directional one-to-one association to Userset @OneToOne @JoinColumn(name="ChildID") private Userset userset2; } @Entity @Table(name="userset") public class Userset { private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L; @Id @Column(name="UsrSetID") private int jngSetID; //bi-directional many-to-one association to Linkeduserset @OneToMany(mappedBy="userset1") private Set<Linkeduserset> linkedusersets; //bi-directional one-to-one association to Linkeduserset @OneToOne(mappedBy="userset2") private Linkeduserset linkeduserset; } Error message: Entity "Linkeduserset" has no Id or EmbeddedId

    Read the article

  • SQL Server Select Distinct

    - by homam
    I want to write a query like this: For a table that has these columns: ColA ColB ColC, ColD select first(ColA, ColB, ColC, ColD) distinct(ColB, ColC) from table order by ColD The query is supposed to order the table by ColD, then group the results by the combination of ColB and ColC (they may have different data types) and returns the first rows (with all the columns of the table) in the groups. How is it possible in MS SQL Server 2005?

    Read the article

  • Porting join from Oracle to Postgres

    - by Grasper
    INSERT INTO MISSION_OBJECTIVE( MSN_INT_ID, MO_INT_ID, MO_MSN_CLASS_NM, MO_MSN_CLASS_CD, MO_MSN_TYPE, MO_PRIORITY, MO_COMMENT, MO_START_DT, MO_END_DT, ASP_AIRSPACE_NM, MO_OBJ_LOCATION, MO_ALO_LEG_ID, MO_ALO_ARRIVE_LOC) SELECT '1025', '1', 'AIRDROP', 'ADP', 'LAPES', NULL, COALESCE( NULL, ' '), TO_TIMESTAMP( '1002260900', 'YYMMDDHH24MI'), TO_TIMESTAMP( '1002260915', 'YYMMDDHH24MI'), 'TRANSIT ALPHA', 'TRANSIT ALPHA', '1', 'TRANSIT ALPHA' FROM AIRSPACE ASP, apsmain .MISSION_CLASS MC WHERE ASP.ASP_AIRSPACE_NM(+)= 'TRANSIT ALPHA' AND MC.MCS_MISSION_CLASS_NAME= 'AIRDROP' AND 'TRANSIT ALPHA' IS NOT NULL Is that exactly the same as: INSERT INTO MISSION_OBJECTIVE( MSN_INT_ID, MO_INT_ID, MO_MSN_CLASS_NM, MO_MSN_CLASS_CD, MO_MSN_TYPE, MO_PRIORITY, MO_COMMENT, MO_START_DT, MO_END_DT, ASP_AIRSPACE_NM, MO_OBJ_LOCATION, MO_ALO_LEG_ID, MO_ALO_ARRIVE_LOC) SELECT '1025', '1', 'AIRDROP', 'ADP', 'LAPES', NULL, COALESCE( NULL, ' '), TO_TIMESTAMP( '1002260900', 'YYMMDDHH24MI'), TO_TIMESTAMP( '1002260915', 'YYMMDDHH24MI'), 'TRANSIT ALPHA', 'TRANSIT ALPHA', '1', 'TRANSIT ALPHA' FROM AIRSPACE ASP, apsmain .MISSION_CLASS MC WHERE ASP.ASP_AIRSPACE_NM = 'TRANSIT ALPHA' AND MC.MCS_MISSION_CLASS_NAME= 'AIRDROP' AND 'TRANSIT ALPHA' IS NOT NULL I just deleted the (+). The part that is confusing me is that ASP.ASP_AIRSPACE_NM is being right joined to a constant.

    Read the article

  • SQL to join to the best matching row

    - by williamjones
    I have a wiki system where there is a central table, Article, that has many Revisions in their own table. The Revisions each contain a created_at time and date column. I want to update the Articles to contain a denormalized field sort_name from the most recent Revision's name field. What SQL command can I issue to fill in each Article's sort_name field with its most recent Revision's name field? For what it's worth, I'm on PostgreSQL.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75  | Next Page >