Search Results

Search found 16050 results on 642 pages for 'linq to objects'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 69/642 | < Previous Page | 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76  | Next Page >

  • C# Linq: Can you merge DataContexts?

    - by Andreas Grech
    Say I have one database, and this database has a set of tables that are general to all Clients and some tables that are specific to certain clients. Now what I have in mind is creating a primary DataContext that includes only the tables that are general to all the clients, and then create separate DataContexts that contain only the tables that are specific to the client. Is there a way to kind of "merge" DataContexts so that it becomes one context? So for Client A, I need one DataContext that includes both the general tables and also the tables for that specific client (retrieved from two different DataContexts) ? [Update] What I think I can do is, from the Partial Class of the DataContext instead of letting my DataContext inherit from DataContext I make it inherit from MyDataContext; that way, the tables from MyDataContext and the other DataContext will be available in one DataContext class. What do you think about this approach? Of course with something like this you can only merge two datacontexts at once though...

    Read the article

  • LINQ extention SelectMany in 3.5 vs 4.0?

    - by Moberg
    Hi When I saw Darins suggestion here .. IEnumerable<Process> processes = new[] { "process1", "process2" } .SelectMany(Process.GetProcessesByName); ( http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3059667/process-getprocessesbyname/3059733#3059733 ) .. I was a bit intrigued and I tried it in VS2008 with .NET 3.5 - and it did not compiling unless I changed it to .. IEnumerable<Process> res = new string[] { "notepad", "firefox", "outlook" } .SelectMany(s => Process.GetProcessesByName(s)); Having read some Darins answers before I suspected that it was me that were the problem, and when I later got my hands on a VS2010 with.NET 4.0 - as expected - the original suggestion worked beautifully. My question is : What have happend from 3.5 to 4.0 that makes this (new syntax) possible? Is it the extentionmethods that have been extended(hmm) or new rules for lambda syntax or? I've tried to search but my google-fu was not strong enough. Please forgive if the question is a bit naive and note that I've taged it as beginner :)

    Read the article

  • nested join linq-to-sql queries

    - by ile
    var result = ( from contact in db.Contacts where contact.ContactID == id join referContactID in db.ContactRefferedBies on contact.ContactID equals referContactID.ContactID join referContactName in db.Contacts on contact.ContactID equals referContactID.ContactID orderby contact.ContactID descending select new ContactReferredByView { ContactReferredByID = referContactID.ContactReferredByID, ContactReferredByName = referContactName.FirstName + " " + referContactName.LastName }).Single(); Problem is in this line: join referContactName in db.Contacts on contact.ContactID equals referContactID.ContactID where referContactID.ContactID is called from the above join line. How to nest these two joins? Thanks in advance! Ile

    Read the article

  • Sort List by occurrence of a word by LINQ C#

    - by Thomas
    i have stored data in list like List<SearchResult> list = new List<SearchResult>(); SearchResult sr = new SearchResult(); sr.Description = "sample description"; list.Add(sr); suppose my data is stored in description field like "JCB Excavator - ECU P/N: 728/35700" "Geo Prism 1995 - ABS #16213899" "Geo Prism 1995 - ABS #16213899" "Geo Prism 1995 - ABS #16213899" "Wie man BBA reman erreicht" "this test JCB" "Ersatz Airbags, Gurtstrammer und Auto Körper Teile" now i want to query the list with my search term like geo jcb if you look then the word geo has stored many times in the description field. so i want to sort my list in such way that the word in search term found maximum that data will come first. please help me to do so. thanks

    Read the article

  • Linq 2 SQL Grouping Question

    - by Jack Marchetti
    var groups = from p in dc.Pool join pm in dc.PoolMembers on p.ID equals pm.PoolID group p by p.Group into grp select new { grp.ID }; This isn't working. Basically I want to do the grouping, and then select certain columns, but when I do select new { grp. } I get no intellisense, so I'm obviously doing something wrong. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Business Objects ver 3 Alternate Row/Column Colors not active

    - by boxeo47
    I am converting reports from version 2 to version 3. When I select the vertical table in the report, the propeties box appears but any changes I make is not reflected in the table. If I change any attributes at the column or cell level however, the changes are taken. The problem is that some attributes like alternate row coloring are not available at the column level.

    Read the article

  • Linq, should I join those two queries together?

    - by 5YrsLaterDBA
    I have a Logins table which records when user is login, logout or loginFailed and its timestamp. Now I want to get the list of loginFailed after last login and the loginFailed happened within 24 hrs. What I am doing now is get the last login timestamp first. then use second query to get the final list. do you think I should join those two queris together? why not? why yes? var lastLoginTime = (from inRecord in db.Logins where inRecord.Users.UserId == userId && inRecord.Action == "I" orderby inRecord.Timestamp descending select inRecord.Timestamp).Take(1); if (lastLoginTime.Count() == 1) { DateTime lastInTime = (DateTime)lastLoginTime.First(); DateTime since = DateTime.Now.AddHours(-24); String actionStr = "F"; var records = from record in db.Logins where record.Users.UserId == userId && record.Timestamp >= since && record.Action == actionStr && record.Timestamp > lastInTime orderby record.Timestamp select record; }

    Read the article

  • Strange LINQ to SQL Behavior

    - by mcass20
    What is wrong with the last query? Is it a bug or am I missing something? This query returns 2 records (correct): query = query.Where(Log => SqlMethods.Like(Log.FormattedMessage, "%<key>Name</key><value>David</value>%")); This query returns 2 records (correct): query = query.Where(Log => SqlMethods.Like(Log.FormattedMessage, "%<key>Name</key><value>%David%</value>%")); This query returns 0 records (correct): query = query.Where(Log => SqlMethods.Like(Log.FormattedMessage, "%<key>Name</key><value>av</value>%")); This query returns 2 records (correct): query = query.Where(Log => SqlMethods.Like(Log.FormattedMessage, "%<key>Name</key><value>%av%</value>%")); This query returns 0 records (correct): query = query.Where(Log => SqlMethods.Like(Log.FormattedMessage, "%<key>Name</key><value>v</value>%")); This query returns 15 records (incorrect, should return 2): query = query.Where(Log => SqlMethods.Like(Log.FormattedMessage, "%<key>Name</key><value>%v%</value>%"));

    Read the article

  • LINQ Left Join And Right Join

    - by raja
    Hi, I need a help, I have two dataTable called A and B , i need all rows from A and matching row of B Ex: A: B: User | age| Data ID | age|Growth 1 |2 |43.5 1 |2 |46.5 2 |3 |44.5 1 |5 |49.5 3 |4 |45.6 1 |6 |48.5 I need Out Put: User | age| Data |Growth ------------------------ 1 |2 |43.5 |46.5 2 |3 |44.5 | 3 |4 |45.6 |

    Read the article

  • remove a duplicate element(with specific value) from xml using linq

    - by Q8Y
    If I have this xml <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <super> <A value="1234"> <a1 xx="000" yy="dddddd" /> <a1 xx="111" yy="eeeeee" /> <a1 xx="222" yy="ffffff"/> </A> </super> and I need to remove a1 element (that have xx=222) completely. why this won't happen using my code?? i realized that it will delete it only if it was placed the first element(i.e, if i want to delete a1 that have x=000 , it will delete it since its the first one), why is that?? what wrong with the code ?? var employee = from emp in element.Elements("A") where (string)emp.Element("a1").Attribute("xx") == "222" select emp.Element("a1"); foreach (var empployee_1 in employee) { empployee_1.Remove(); } element.Save(@"TheLocation"); thanks alot

    Read the article

  • c# Convert LINQ var result to actual type

    - by DrBob
    In c#, Given the following code: public class Person { public int PersonID { get; set; } public int Age { get; set; } public string Name { get; set; } } and List<Person> people = new List<Person>(); for (int i = 0; i != 15; i++) { Person p = new Person(); p.PersonID = i; p.Age = i * 12; p.Name = "Name " + i; people.Add(p); } var sortedPeople = from qPeople in people where qPeople.Age > 0 && qPeople.Age < 25 || qPeople.Age > 100 orderby qPeople.Age descending select qPeople; Can I load the results of sortedPeople back into a List<Person without a loop? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Custom sort logic in OrderBy using LINQ

    - by Bala R
    What would be the right way to sort a list of strings where I want items starting with an underscore '_', to be at the bottom of the list, otherwise everything is alphabetical. Right now I'm doing something like this, autoList.OrderBy(a => a.StartsWith("_") ? "ZZZZZZ"+a : a ) EDIT: I ended up using something like this; optimization suggestions welcome! private class AutoCompleteComparer : IComparer<String> { public int Compare(string x, string y) { if (x.StartsWith("_") && y.StartsWith("_") || (!x.StartsWith("_") && !y.StartsWith("_"))) { return x.CompareTo(y); } else if (x.StartsWith("_")) { return 1; } else if (y.StartsWith("_")) { return -1; } return 0; } }

    Read the article

  • Creating objects makes the VM faster?

    - by Sudhir Jonathan
    Look at this piece of code: MessageParser parser = new MessageParser(); for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { parser.parse(plainMessage, user); } For some reason, it runs SLOWER (by about 100ms) than for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { MessageParser parser = new MessageParser(); parser.parse(plainMessage, user); } Any ideas why? The tests were repeated a lot of times, so it wasn't just random. How could creating an object 10000 times be faster than creating it once?

    Read the article

  • JS assignment order of properties in objects

    - by devdev
    Just had a quick question about why a certain order of assignment works and another doesn't. I wanted to create a simple "inherit" / "copy" function (just for testing it) that copies properties from one object to another: var cat = { tail:"yes", hairy:"yes, hairy" }; var dog = { sick:"extremely ill"}; function inherit(obj1, obj2) { for (var p in obj1) { obj2[p] = obj1[p]; // this works, but "obj1[p] = obj2[p];" doesn't. Why?? } } inherit(cat, dog); console.log(dog.tail);

    Read the article

  • Entity framework with Linq to Entities performance

    - by mare
    If I have a static method like this public static string GetTicClassificationTitle(string classI, string classII, string classIII) { using (TicDatabaseEntities ticdb = new TicDatabaseEntities()) { var result = from classes in ticdb.Classifications where classes.ClassI == classI where classes.ClassII == classII where classes.ClassIII == classIII select classes.Description; return result.FirstOrDefault(); } } and use this method in various places in foreach loops or just plain calling it numerous times, does it create and open new connection every time? If so, how can I tackle this? Should I cache the results somewhere, like in this case, I would cache the entire Classifications table in Memory Cache? And then do queries vs this cached object? Or should I make TicDatabaseEntities variable static and initialize it at class level? Should my class be static if it contains only static methods? Because right now it is not.. Also I've noticed that if I return result.First() instead of FirstOrDefault() and the query does not find a match, it will issue an exception (with FirstOrDefault() there is no exception, it returns null). Thank you for clarification.

    Read the article

  • Use of where in multiple joins to remove rows - linq

    - by bergin
    hi, I have a table of orders. the status is on the soilorders which is joined to the orders. I only want to return orders where the joined soilorder does not have status "Removed". I had thought that join sso in db.SoilSamplingOrders on ord.order_id equals sso.order_id where sso.status.Equals("Removed")!=true but then no records are returned! thanks for any help (query below) var query = from ord in db.Orders join sso in db.SoilSamplingOrders on ord.order_id equals sso.order_id where sso.status.Equals("Removed")!=true join cust in db.Customers on ord.customer_id equals cust.customer_id select new Listing { assigned_to = sso.assigned_to, company = cust.company, order_id = ord.order_id, order_created = ord.order_created, customer_id = ord.customer_id, order_created_by_employ_id = ord.order_created_by_employ_id, first_farm_on_order = (from f in db.SoilSamplingSubJobs where f.order_id == ord.order_id select new ListingSubJob { first_farm_on_order = f.farm }). AsEnumerable().First().first_farm_on_order, total_fields = (from f in db.SoilSamplingSubJobs where f.order_id == ord.order_id select new { f.sssj_id }).AsEnumerable().Count(), total_area = (float?) (from f in db.SoilSamplingSubJobs where f.order_id == ord.order_id && f.area_ha != null select f.area_ha ).Sum() ?? 0 , total_area_ph_density = (float?)(from f in db.SoilSamplingSubJobs where f.order_id == ord.order_id && f.ph != null select f.ph).Sum() ?? 0, };

    Read the article

  • Can i use join with let in linq - c#

    - by uno
    let order= _relationContext.Orders .Where(x => x.OrderNumber == orderNo) .Select(x => new { x.OrderNo, x.OrderDate }).Single() I want to try and do something like this let order = _relationContext.Orders join _relationContext.Products .Where(x => x.OrderNumber == orderNo && x.ProductId == Products.ProductID) .Select(x => new { x.OrderNo, x.OrderDate }).Single() Is this even possible?

    Read the article

  • Conditional Join In LINQ?

    - by Soo
    I am trying to write a query that grabs information from one database and joins it to information in a different database. TableA idA valueA idB TableB idB valueB The tricky part is that in TableA, idB isn't always defined, so when I do a normal join, I only get results where TableA has a idB value. What I want is to be able to grab all of the information from TableA even if it doesn't have a corresponding idB value.

    Read the article

  • LINQ to Entites: How should I handle System.InvalidOperationException when checking for existance of

    - by chris
    I have a many-to-one relationship that users can edit via checkboxes. PK of Foo is ID, and fid contains the id from the checkbox. I'm checking to see if an element exists with: Foo ent; try { ent = ctx.Foo.First(f => f.ID == fid); } catch (System.InvalidOperationException ioe) { ent = new Foo(); } It seems to me that I should be able to do this without throwing an exception. What would be the best way to do this?

    Read the article

  • Problematic behavior of Linq Union?!

    - by Foxfire
    Hi, consider the following example: public IEnumerable<String> Test () { IEnumerable<String> lexicalStrings = new List<String> { "test", "t" }; IEnumerable<String> allLexicals = new List<String> { "test", "Test", "T", "t" }; IEnumerable<String> lexicals = new List<String> (); foreach (String s in lexicalStrings) lexicals = lexicals.Union (allLexicals.Where (lexical => lexical == s)); return lexicals; } I'd hoped for it to produce "test", "t" as output, but it does not (The output is only "t"). I'm not sure, but may have to do something with the deferred processing. Any ideas how to get this to work or for a good alternative?

    Read the article

  • Displaying text in C# from XML via LINQ

    - by xscape
    Is there a way to display "Test" value as bold just like the implementation of newline? <testElement>Test &#xD; Test</testElement> The output of the above line when you display it is: TEST TEST I want to know what/how to make the second line as bold just line by using expressions. Thank you

    Read the article

  • Linq DBML multiple sql servers

    - by Hurricanepkt
    I have an archive system that had to be on two sql databases for simplicity one is Archive2009 and the other Archive2010 they are both on the same sql server and instance and have identical structures however I have a page that needs to view the old one and the new one (I can make two seperate pages) How best would I go about doing this? Dynamically changing the connection string etc?

    Read the article

  • Storing values in the DataValueField and DataTextField of a dropdownlist using a linq query

    - by user1318369
    I have a website for dance academy where Users can register and add/drop dance classes. In the web page to drop a particular dance, for a particular user, the dropdown displays her registered dances. Now I want to delete one of the dances from the list. So I'll remove the row from the table and also from the dropdownlist. The problem is that everytime the item with the lowest ID (index) is getting deleted, no matter which one the user selects. I think I am storing the DataTextField and DataValueField for the dropdown incorrectly. The code is: private void PopulateDanceDropDown() { // Retrieve the username MembershipUser currentUser = Membership.GetUser(); var username = currentUser.UserName; // Retrive the userid of the curren user var dancerIdFromDB = from d in context.DANCER where d.UserName == username select d.UserId; Guid dancerId = new Guid(); var first = dancerIdFromDB.FirstOrDefault(); if (first != null) { dancerId = first; } dances.DataSource = (from dd in context.DANCER_AND_DANCE where dd.UserId == dancerId select new { Text = dd.DanceName, Value = dd.DanceId }).ToList(); dances.DataTextField = "Text"; dances.DataValueField = "Value"; dances.DataBind(); } protected void dropthedance(object o, EventArgs e) { String strDataValueField = dances.SelectedItem.Value; int danceIDFromDropDown = Convert.ToInt32(strDataValueField); var dancer_dance = from dd in context.DANCER_AND_DANCE where dd.DanceId == danceIDFromDropDown select dd; foreach (var dndd in dancer_dance) { context.DANCER_AND_DANCE.DeleteOnSubmit(dndd); } try { context.SubmitChanges(); } catch (Exception ex) { Console.WriteLine(ex); } } The problem is in the line: String strDataValueField = dances.SelectedItem.Value; The strDataValueField is always getting the minimum id from the list of dance item ids in the dropdown (which happens by default). I want this to hold the id of the dance selected by the user.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76  | Next Page >