Search Results

Search found 31321 results on 1253 pages for 'array size'.

Page 7/1253 | < Previous Page | 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14  | Next Page >

• PHP : flatten array - fastest way?

  - by Industrial

  Is there any fast way to flatten an array and select subkeys ('key'&'value' in this case) without running a foreach loop, or is the foreach always the fastest way? Array ( [0] => Array ( [key] => string [value] => a simple string [cas] => 0 ) [1] => Array ( [key] => int [value] => 99 [cas] => 0 ) [2] => Array ( [key] => array [value] => Array ( [0] => 11 [1] => 12 ) [cas] => 0 ) ) To: Array ( [int] => 99 [string] => a simple string [array] => Array ( [0] => 11 [1] => 12 ) )

  Read the article

• what appropriate "Allocation Unit Size" for an exFAT SD card with ReadyBoost

  - by Revolter

  I've brought an 4GB SD card and I'm dedicating it for use by ReadyBoost (on Windows7) Im looking to get the most profit on performance, so i've formatted it with exFAT (as recommended by Microsoft) but I have some doubts to define what best .Allocation Unit Size* I should choose. Since I can't get how ReadyBoost/SD card exactly read/seek the data, can someone tell what make choosing an Allocation Unit Size in favor of another for this scheme ? Apparently, ReadyBoost is allocating all the free space in SD card as one huge file, so a big Allocation Unit Size is advised for fastest reading time. I'm not confusing with ordinary HDD's ?

  Read the article

• Showing folder size in Windows Explorer is a missing feature in Windows 7 [closed]

  - by JamesM

  Why doesn't Microsoft implement Folder Size in the file explorer for Windows 7? When viewing a directory you get a list of files and folders. The files all show their filesize, but the folders do not. To see the folder size you have to use the tooltip, or go to File Properties. Folder Size for Windows is a project that already exists which provides an addon to do this. I cannot believe Microsoft didnt put it in Windows 7! Unless I am wrong. I am sure however, they may have a good reason for which I lack understanding.

  Read the article

• Windows 7: How to display the total size of Recycle Bin

  - by Mehper C. Palavuzlar

  On Windows XP, the total size of Recycle Bin could be seen easily, but I can't see it on Windows 7. Why did Microsoft hide/remove this feature? Am I missing something? REMARK 1: I don't need to see the maximum size that Recyle Bin can contain. REMARK 2: Once you have several files selected in the Recycle Bin, you get a "See more details" link in the status bar, but clicking on that does not display the total file size. Microsoft has apparently changed this.

  Read the article

• wordpress makes duplicate images of different size

  - by Mark

  I have a wordpress website. I upload my pictures to the media library. And when I import a picture in a post, you get the options, one of which ask you what size to display it in. And doing this results in creating a new image file that is a different size, rather than wordpress using html to control the size of the image. The following image shows how different sized picture copies are made of the same one with different resolution. http://imgur.com/uVqTN Thank you everyone in advance.

  Read the article

• Why I lose certain values from array?

  - by blankon91

  I've the code to input the values dynamically, when I use it to add the values for the first time, it's fine, but when I want to edit it, the old values didn't inserted on sql query but the new values inserted Here is the example: http://i.stack.imgur.com/dwugS.jpg here is the code: ============the function================= sub ShowItemfgEdit(query,selItemName,defValue,num,cdisable) response.write "<select " & cdisable & " num=""" & num & """ id=""itemCombo"" name=""" & selItemName & """ class=""label"" onchange=""varUsage.ChangeSatuanDt(this)"">" if NOT query.BOF then query.moveFirst WHILE NOT query.EOF tulis = "" if trim(defValue) = trim(query("ckdbarang")) then tulis = "selected" end if response.write "<option value=""" & trim(query("ckdbarang")) & """" & tulis & ">" & trim(query("ckdbarang")) & " - " & trim(query("vnamabarang")) query.moveNext WEND end if response.write "</select>" end sub ============calling the function================ <td class="rb" align="left"><% call ShowItemfgEdit(qGetItemfgGrp,"fitem",qGetUsageDt("ckdfg"),countLine,readonlyfg) %></td> ==============post the value====================== <input type="hidden" name="fitem" value=""> ================get the value=================== for i = 1 to request.form("hdnOrderNum") if request.form("selOrdItem_" & i) <> "" then 'bla...blaa...blaa... ckdfg = trim(request.form("fitem_" & i)) '<==here is the problem objCommand.commandText = "INSERT INTO IcTrPakaiDt " &_ "(id, id_h, ckdunitkey, cnopakai, dtglpakai, ckdbarang, ckdgudang, nqty1, nqty2, csatuan1, csatuan2, nqtypakai, csatuanpakai, vketerangan, cJnsPakai, ckdprodkey, ckdfg, ncountstart, ncountstop, ncounttotal) " &_ " VALUES " &_ " (" & idDt & ",'" & idHd & "','" & selLoc & "','" & nopakai & "','" & cDate(request.form("hdnUsageDate")) & "','" & trim(ckdbarang) & "','" & trim(ckdgudang) & "'," & nqty1 & "," & nqty2 & ",'" & trim(csatuan1) & "','" & trim(csatuan2) & "'," & nqtypakai & ",'" & csatuanpakai & "','" & trim(keteranganItem) & "','" & trim(cjnspakai) & "','" & ckdprodkey & "','" &ckdfg& "'," & cnt1 & "," & cnt2 & "," & totalcnt & ")" set qInsertPakaiDt = objCommand.Execute end if next problem: old value of ckdfg didn't inserted to query, but the new value inserted. How to fix this bug?

  Read the article

• Combining array values in multilevel array

  - by James Huckabone

  I have an array like so: array( 'a'=>array( 'a'=>3, 'f'=>5, 'sdf'=>0), 't'=>array( 'a'=>1, 'f'=>2, 'sdf'=>5), 'pps'=>array( 'a'=>1, 'f'=>2, 'sdf'=>3) ); Notice how the sub-arrays are the same for each top-level array. If I wanted to, what's the easiest way to combine the sub-arrays so that I'm left with a one-dimensional array like: array( 'a'=>5, 'f'=>9, 'sdf'=>8 );

  Read the article

• Maximum File Size and Pixels for Uploaded Business Documents

  - by webdevguy

  I am creating a php form that accepts an upload of business documents in a variety of formats .pdf, .doc, .tiff, .jpeg, etc. and I need to restrict the size of the files that are uploaded. It's trivial for me to restrict the file size, but I'm not sure if I should also restrict the max height/width, which are also available options. I will need to occasionally print these documents to 8.5 X 11inch paper and have them be legible, but don't really care if images come out. Should I restrict the pixels sizes or is that redundant with restricting the file size? If so, do you guys have a recommendations for max height/width for, say, a 5MB file size limit? I really have no idea what the relationship between pixel size and image size is or what the common pixel sizes are for scanned images. Also, what would be a reasonable size expectation for a legible print per page?

  Read the article

• Slow parity initialization of RAID-5 array on HP Smart Array 411 controller

  - by Rob Nicholson

  On 29th October 2011, I built a RAID-5 array using 4 x 146.8GB Seagate SAS ST3146855SS drives running at 15k connected to a PowerEdge R515 with HP Smart Array P411 controller running Windows 2008 (so nothing particularly unusual). I know that parity initialisation of a RAID-5 array can take some time but it's still running after 2.5 weeks which seems a little unusual. I'd previously built another array on the same controller using 4 x 2TB SATA-2 drives and that did take a while to complete but a) I'm sure it was less than 2.5 weeks, b) that array was ~12 times bigger and c) during initialization, the percentrage slowly increased each day. At the moment, the status display for this new 2nd array simply says "Parity Initialization Status: In Progress" and it's said that since the start. It's this lack of change on the status that worries me the most - feels like it's not actually doing anything. Do you think something has gone wrong or am I being unpatient and for some reason, the status not increasing is normal? I kind of expected a much smaller array on faster drives (15k SAS versus 7.5k SATA-2) to build in a few days. This is our primary SAN running StarWind so my "have a play" options are very limited. This 2nd array is currently in use for one small virtual disk so I could shut the target machine down, move the virtual disk to another drive and try rebuilding.

  Read the article

• PHP Function needed for GENERIC sorting of a recordset array

  - by donbriggs

  Somebody must have come up with a solution for this by now. I wrote a PHP class to display a recordset as an HTML table/datagrid, and I wish to expand it so that we can sort the datagrid by whichever column the user selects. In the below example data, we may need to sort the recordset array by Name, Shirt, Assign, or Age fields. I will take care of the display part, I just need help with sorting the data array. As usual, I query a database to get a result, iterate throught he result, and put the records into an assciateiave array. So, we end up with an array of arrays. (See below.) I need to be able to sort by any column in the dataset. However, I will not know the column names at design time, nor will I know if the colums will be string or numeric values. I have seen a ton of solutions to this, but I have not seen a GOOD and GENERIC solution Can somebody please suggest a way that I can sort the recordset array that is GENERIC, and will work on any recordset? Again, I will not know the fields names or datatypes at design time. The array presented below is ONLY an example. Array ( [0] = Array ( [name] = Kirk [shrit] = Gold [assign] = Bridge ) [1] => Array ( [name] => Spock [shrit] => Blue [assign] => Bridge ) [2] => Array ( [name] => Uhura [shrit] => Red [assign] => Bridge ) [3] => Array ( [name] => Scotty [shrit] => Red [assign] => Engineering ) [4] => Array ( [name] => McCoy [shrit] => Blue [assign] => Sick Bay ) )

  Read the article

• Adding an Array inside an array in a PHP function

  - by bateman_ap

  I have created a function in PHP that calls a webservice and parses through the result, assinging values to variables and returning them all as an Array. This all works perfectly, however I have come across a need to have an "array within my array" I am assigning values as below: $productName = $product->Name; $productID = $product->ID; $productArray = array( 'productName' => "$productName", 'productID' => "$productID" ); return $productArray; However I now have a piece of data that comes back with multiple results so I need to have a additional array to store these, I am getting the values from the returned XML using a foreach loop, however I want to be able to add them to the array with a name so I can reference them in the returned data, this is where I have a problem... $bestForLists = $product->BestFors; foreach( $bestForLists as $bestForList ) { $productBestFors = $bestForList->BestFor; foreach( $productBestFors as $productBestFor ) { $productBestForName = $productBestFor->Name; $productBestForID = $productBestFor->ID; } } I tried creating an array for these using the below code: $bestForArray[] = (array( "productBestForID" => "$productBestForID", "productBestForName" => "$productBestForName" )); And then at the end merging these together: $productArray= array_merge($productArray,$bestForArray); If I print out the returned value I get: Array ( [productName] => Test Product [productID] => 14128 [0] => Array ( [productBestForID] => 56647 [productBestForName] => Lighting ) [1] => Array ( [productBestForID] => 56648 [productBestForName] => Sound ) ) I would like to give the internal Array a name so I can reference it in my code, or is there a better way of doing this, at the moment I am using the following in my PHP page to get values: $productName = $functionReturnedValues['productName']; I would like to use the following to access the array I could then loop through: $bestForArray = $functionReturnedValues['bestForArray']; Hope someone can help

  Read the article

• How to combine these two PHP arrays ?

  - by Annan

  I have two arrays in php that are part of an image management system. weighted_images A multidimensional array. Each sub array is an associative array with keys of 'weight' (for ordering by) and 'id' (the id of the image). array( 156 => array('weight'=>1, 'id'=>156), 784 => array('weight'=>-2, 'id'=>784), ) images This array is user input. It's an array of image ids. array(784, 346, 748) I want to combine them in to a single array of ids ordered by the weight of the image. If an image doesn't have a weight append to the end. It's not a particularly hard problem however my solution is far from elegant and can't help thinking that there must be a better way to do this. $t_images = array(); foreach ($weighted_images as $wi) { if ( in_array($wi['id'], $images) ) { $t_images[$wi['weight']] = $wi['id']; } } foreach ($images as $image) { if ( !$weighted_images[$image] ) { $t_images[] = $image; } } $images = $t_images; Question: Is there a better way to do this?

  Read the article

• How to sort a multidimensional array by a certain key?

  - by Eelke

  This should be really simple, but what is the way to go on this. I want to sort an multidimensional array by a key, like this: Array ( [0] => Array ( [iid] => 1 [invitee] => 174 [nid] => 324343 [showtime] => 2010-05-09 15:15:00 [location] => 13 [status] => 1 [created] => 2010-05-09 15:05:00 [updated] => 2010-05-09 16:24:00 ) [1] => Array ( [iid] => 1 [invitee] => 220 [nid] => 21232 [showtime] => 2010-05-09 15:15:00 [location] => 12 [status] => 0 [created] => 2010-05-10 18:11:00 [updated] => 2010-05-10 18:11:00 )) Say i want to sort this by [status], how would I achieve this? Thanks in advance!

  Read the article

• All possibilities in 2d array

  - by valli-R

  I have this array: $array = array ( array('1', '2', '3'), array('!', '@'), array('a', 'b', 'c', 'd'), ); And I want to know all character combination of sub arrays.. for example : 1!a 1!b 1!c 1!d 1@a 1@b 1@c 1@d 2!a 2!b 2!c 2!d 2@a 2@b ... Currently I am having this code : for($i = 0; $i < count($array[0]); $i++) { for($j = 0; $j < count($array[1]); $j++) { for($k = 0; $k < count($array[2]); $k++) { echo $array[0][$i].$array[1][$j].$array[2][$k].'<br/>'; } } } It works, but I think it is ugly, and when I am adding more arrays, I have to add more for. I am pretty sure there is a way to do this recursively, but I don't know how to start/how to do it. A little help could be nice! Thanks you!

  Read the article

• Zimbra mail server: Changing max message size problem

  - by s4uadmin

  Hello, We are having some issues with changing the maximum message size in zimbra We followed the instructions given on the zimbra wiki zimbra@ZIM1:~$ zmprov modifyConfig zimbraMtaMaxMessageSize 2048000 zimbra@ZIM1:~$ postfix reload postfix/postfix-script: refreshing the Postfix mail system zimbra@ZIM1:~$ postconf | grep message_size_limit message_size_limit = 10240000 Strange thing: The setting displayed in the admin page does change but not to the corresponding size (2000kb) It would be much appreciated if someone can help us. Grtz, Thomas

  Read the article

• Sort files in folders by size (Mac OS X)

  - by Željko Filipin

  I have a folder full of folders and files. I want to sort files by size (so I could remove the largest files). I know how to do that in Windows Explorer, but I can not find a way to do it in Mac OS X Finder. Windows 2003: open folder in Windows Explorer click button Search leave Search for files or folders named and Containing text text fields empty click button Search Now sort by size Is there a way to do something like this in Finder on Mac OS X?

  Read the article

• text size on 15.6" and 17.3" laptop screens

  - by Joshi

  I'm I correct in assuming that the size of text etc will be the same on: 17.3" screen with native resolution of 1600x900 15.6" screen with native resolution of 1366x768 The DPI for screen 1 is 106; for screen 2 it's 100 which is near enough the same. So the only real difference is that I could get more text (of the same size) on each line and more lines on the 17.3" screen???? Have I understood this correctly?

  Read the article

• Volume size doesn't match Disk size after gparted expansion

  - by Cybersylum

  I just expanded a basic disk on a Windows XP VM from 15gb to 40 gb using GPARTED LiveCD (0.5.2-11). I didn't notice anything unusual during the expansion; but after I rebooted back into Windows, the disk capacity doesn't match the disk size as it should (only 1 volume on the disk). The disk shows as 40gb; but the C: volume still shows the original size. I've tried expanding the disk again with GPARTED (no change), and using VMware converter and have it adjust the size of the volume during the process (complains about a lack of space of snapshot error inside the os). The volume has 27% free space so I don't think it is a space issue. Chkdsk doesn't seem to find anything wrong either. The OS seems to run just fine, it doesn't see the additional space however. Any ideas?

  Read the article

• Anyone Know a Great Sparse One Dimensional Array Library in Python?

  - by TheJacobTaylor

  I am working on an algorithm in Python that uses arrays heavily. The arrays are typically sparse and are read from and written to constantly. I am currently using relatively large native arrays and the performance is good but the memory usage is high (as expected). I would like to be able to have the array implementation not waste space for values that are not used and allow an index offset other than zero. As an example, if my numbers start at 1,000,000 I would like to be able to index my array starting at 1,000,000 and not be required to waste memory with a million unused values. Array reads and writes needs to be fast. Expanding into new territory can be a small delay but reads and writes should be O(1) if possible. Does anybody know of a library that can do it? Thanks!

  Read the article

• How to add values in multidimensional array?

  - by vaiji

  I have a array like the bellow. Array ( [1] => Array ( [TotalPosts] => 46 [AgentSchemeNumber] => 11 [AgentName] => Vaiji ) [2] => Array ( [TotalPosts] => 3 [AgentSchemeNumber] => 22 [AgentName] => Vaiji ) [3] => Array ( [TotalPosts] => 0 [AgentSchemeNumber] => 33 [AgentName] => Vicky ) [4] => Array ( [TotalPosts] => 0 [AgentSchemeNumber] => 44 [AgentName] => Raja ) [5] => Array ( [TotalPosts] => 18 [AgentSchemeNumber] => 55 [AgentName] => Rama ) [6] => Array ( [TotalPosts] => 13 [AgentSchemeNumber] => 66 [AgentName] => Udaya ) ) Here AgentName vaiji contain 2 records. I want a output like Array ( [1] => Array ( [TotalPosts] => 49 [AgentSchemeNumber] => 11 or 22 (any number) [AgentName] => Vaiji ) [2] => Array ( [TotalPosts] => 0 [AgentSchemeNumber] => 33 [AgentName] => Vicky ) [3] => Array ( [TotalPosts] => 0 [AgentSchemeNumber] => 44 [AgentName] => Raja ) [4] => Array ( [TotalPosts] => 18 [AgentSchemeNumber] => 55 [AgentName] => Rama ) [5] => Array ( [TotalPosts] => 13 [AgentSchemeNumber] => 66 [AgentName] => Udaya ) ) Please help me how to do it?

  Read the article

• What is the ideal file size for a web page? [closed]

  - by Rob

  Possible Duplicate: Is there a maximum size that web pages should be kept under? What is the ideal file size for a web page? Specifically when it comes to image sizes, what's the total file size for a webpage which includes several images. I tend to compress images down as much as possible before it starts to visually lose quality. We run several CMS website's and the clients tend to ask this question a lot! I'd love to hear another view on it.

  Read the article

• "Simple" sort a nested array using array_multisort or native PHP functions instead of my own foreach loop

  - by Ana Ban

  I have the following array of days of the week, with each day having hours of the day (the whole array represents the schedule of a part-time employee): Array ( [7] => Array ( [0] => 15 [1] => 14 [2] => 13 [3] => 11 [4] => 12 [5] => 10 ) [1] => Array ( [0] => 10 [1] => 13 [2] => 12 ) [6] => Array ( [0] => 14 ) [3] => Array ( [0] => 4 [1] => 5 [2] => 6 ) ) and I simply need to: sort asc each sub-array (2nd dimension) - no need to maintain the numeric keys, values are integers sort asc the 1st dimension and maintain the numeric, integer keys ie: Array ( [1] => Array ( [0] => 10 [1] => 12 [2] => 13 ) [3] => Array ( [0] => 4 [1] => 5 [2] => 6 ) [6] => Array ( [0] => 14 ) [7] => Array ( [0] => 10 [1] => 11 [2] => 12 [3] => 13 [4] => 14 [5] => 15 ) ) Additional info: only the keys of the 1st dimension and the values of the 2nd dimension (and of course their association) are meaningful to my use-case the 1st dimension can have at most 7 values, ranging from 1-7 (days of the week), and will have at least 1 value (1 day) the 2nd dimension can have at most 24 values, ranging from 0-23 (hours of each day), and will have at least 1 value (1 hour per day) I know I can do this with a foreach on the whole ksorted array and sort each 2nd dimension array: ksort($sched); foreach ($sched as &$array) sort($array); unset($array); but I was hoping I could achieve this with native php array function(s) instead. My search led me to try array_multisort(array_values($array), array_keys($array), $array) but I just can't make it work.

  Read the article

• Remove values from array on foreach PHP

  - by user104531

  I have an array like this: Array ( [0] => Array ( [id] => 68 [type] => onetype [type_id] => 131 [name] => name1 ) [1] => Array ( [id] => 32 [type] => anothertype [type_id] => 101 [name] => name2 ) ) I need to remove some arrays from it if the users has permissions or not to see that kind of type. I am thinking on doing it with a for each, and do the needed ifs inside it to remove or let it as it. My question is: What's the most efficent way to do this? The array will have no more than 100 records. But several users will request it and do the filtering over and over.

  Read the article

• A Simple PHP Array Manipulation

  - by Ygam

  Hi guys! how would you turn this array: array( 0 => Title1, 1 => Title2, 3 => Address1, 4 => Address2, ) to this array: array ( 0 => array( 'title' => 'Title1' 'address' =>'Address1' ), 1 => array( 'title' => 'Title2', 'address' => 'Address2' ) ); when you were initially given $_POST['title'] = array('Title1', 'Title2); $_POST['address'] = array('Address1', 'Address2'); which when merged would give you the first array I have given I was able to solve this via a high level Arr:Rotate function in Kohana framework, along with Arr::merge function but I can't quite understand the implementation. Please help

  Read the article

• Ruby - Subclassing array to make it randomize when flattened

  - by Markus O'Reilly

  I'm trying to subclass Array in ruby to make it randomize its elements when flatten! is called. Looking at the source code for Array#flatten (http://ruby-doc.org/core/classes/Array.src/M002218.html), it looks like it should recursively call flatten! on any array contained within an array. So, I tried doing something like this: class RandArray < Array def randomize! self.sort!{rand(3)-1} end def flatten! randomize! super end end However, when a normal array contains my RandArray and flatten is called on the normal array, flatten! is never called in my array. I figure ruby is just calling some other method to flatten the arrays recursively, but I can't figure out what that is. Any tips?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14  | Next Page >