Search Results

Search found 8371 results on 335 pages for 'inline block'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 7/335 | < Previous Page | 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14  | Next Page >

  • XHTML validating block level element as a link

    - by Matty F
    I need a way to make an entire DL element clickable with only one anchor tag, that validates as XHTML. As in: <a> <dl> <dt>Data term</dt> <dd>Data definition</dd> </dl> </a> This currently doesn't validate as XHTML as the anchor tag cannot contain the DL. The only way I can get it to validate is if I make two anchor tags and place them inside DT and DD. As in: <dl> <dt><a>Data term</a></dt> <dd><a>Data definition</a></dt> </dl> I'm trying to avoid this, as it would result in two href attributes requiring maintenance, introducing the possibility they could become out of sync. Suggestions?

    Read the article

  • python subprocess block

    - by MW
    Hello. I'm having a problem with the module subprocess. I'm running a script from python through: subprocess.Popen('./run_pythia.sh',shell=True).communicate() and sometimes it just blocks and it doesn't finish to execute the script. Before I was using .wait() instead of .communicate() but then because of this: http://dcreager.net/2009/08/06/subprocess-communicate-drawbacks/ I changed to .communicate(). Nevertheless the problem continues. Can anyone help me?

    Read the article

  • Twig templates, inheritances and block usage

    - by user846226
    I've created three templates using Twig. The first one has block A defined in it, the second one extends from the first one, but includes a third template which sets the content of block A. When loading, through the browser, the url which renders b.html.twig, the content in block A (defined by the 3th template) is not positioned block _A is defined. Example: <!-- base.html.twig --> {% block _css '' %} {% block _header '' %} {% block _content '' %} {% block _footer '' %} {% block _js '' %} <!-- layout.html.twig --> <!-- header and footer are placed in the raight zone --> {% extends ::base.html.twig %} {% block _header %} {% render "MyBundleBundle:Header:header" %} {% endblock %} {% block _footer %} {% render "MyBundleBundle:Footer:footer" %} {% endblock %} <!-- my_template.html.twig --> <!-- content is also placed in the right zone but css and js blocks in the included template are not placed where declared in base.html.twig --> {% extends MyBundleBundle::layout.html.twig %} {% block _content %} SOME_CONTENT {% include MyBundleBundle::my_included_template.html.twig %} {% endblock %} <!-- my_included_template.html.twig --> {% block _css %} <link.......................> {% endblock %} {% block _js %} <script..................> {% endblock %} MORE CONTENT BELONGING TO THE INCLUDED TEMPLATE What i expect here is, _css blocks content to appear on top of the page and _js block content at the bottom, but that's not happening. I hope you can see where i'm going wrong, thanks!

    Read the article

  • Block All Keyboard Input in a Linux Application (Using Qt or Mono)

    - by Evans
    Hi, I'm working on a online quiz client where we use a dedicated custom-made linux distro which contains only the quiz client software along with text editors and other utility software. When the user has started the quiz, I want to prevent him/her from minimizing the window/closing it/switching to the desktop or other windows. The quizzes can be attempted using only the mouse, so I need the keyboard to be completed disabled for the period of the quiz. How could I do this, using Qt or Mono? I'm ready to use any low-level libraries/drivers, if required. Thanks Evans

    Read the article

  • I'm confused with block in ruby, compared to smalltalk.

    - by weakish
    What does block in ruby mean? It looks similar with smalltalk, but you can't send messages to it. For example, in smalltalk: [:x | x + 3] value: 3 returns 6. But in ruby: {|x| x + 3}.call 3 will cause SyntaxError. Well, you can pass messages to lambda in ruby, though: irb(main):025:0> ->(x){x+3}.call 3 => 6 So in ruby, block is not a block, but lambda is a block? Is this true? I mean, are there any differences between ruby lambda and smalltalk block? If this is true, then what is ruby block?

    Read the article

  • Block Fortress is an Awesome Tower Defense Game

    - by Akemi Iwaya
    What do you get when you mix Minecraft, tower defense, and a first-person shooter together? Block Fortress! This awesome game combines the best aspects of three game types into one unique, action-packed romp for survival and victory. Keep in mind that the game has quite a bit going on, so we will only be able to offer a quick glimpse with our post. Also, it may take a few minutes to become familiar with how to maneuver around in the game area using various gestures on your device’s screen. From the Block Fortress homepage: It offers more than 30 different building blocks, 16 different turret blocks, and tons of additional items to build (including mining blocks, lumber blocks, storage crates, power generators, and much more). It also includes many different weapon and item upgrades for your character – all brought to bear against the relentless attacks of the Goblocks! Block Fortress currently comes with three modes of game play: Survival, Quickstart, and Sandbox. As you can see, there should be more modes available at a later date. There are many types of terrain to choose from, or if you wish you can select Random for a nice surprise. For our example we chose Snowy Hills. Time to have a look around and find a nice spot to set up our barracks… This spot looks like it will do rather nicely… Just for fun we set up a castle-style set of walls and entry point for our barracks. Now on to fun and adventure! You can see what the game looks like in action with the official launch trailer… Price: 0.99 (U.S.) Block Fortress [iTunes App Store] Block Fortress Homepage Official Block Fortress Launch Trailer [YouTube]    

    Read the article

  • Inline function v. Macro in C -- What's the Overhead (Memory/Speed)?

    - by Jason R. Mick
    I searched Stack Overflow for the pros/cons of function-like macros v. inline functions. I found the following discussion: Pros and Cons of Different macro function / inline methods in C ...but it didn't answer my primary burning question. Namely, what is the overhead in c of using a macro function (with variables, possibly other function calls) v. an inline function, in terms of memory usage and execution speed? Are there any compiler-dependent differences in overhead? I have both icc and gcc at my disposal. My code snippet I'm modularizing is: double AttractiveTerm = pow(SigmaSquared/RadialDistanceSquared,3); double RepulsiveTerm = AttractiveTerm * AttractiveTerm; EnergyContribution += 4 * Epsilon * (RepulsiveTerm - AttractiveTerm); My reason for turning it into an inline function/macro is so I can drop it into a c file and then conditionally compile other similar, but slightly different functions/macros. e.g.: double AttractiveTerm = pow(SigmaSquared/RadialDistanceSquared,3); double RepulsiveTerm = pow(SigmaSquared/RadialDistanceSquared,9); EnergyContribution += 4 * Epsilon * (RepulsiveTerm - AttractiveTerm); (note the difference in the second line...) This function is a central one to my code and gets called thousands of times per step in my program and my program performs millions of steps. Thus I want to have the LEAST overhead possible, hence why I'm wasting time worrying about the overhead of inlining v. transforming the code into a macro. Based on the prior discussion I already realize other pros/cons (type independence and resulting errors from that) of macros... but what I want to know most, and don't currently know is the PERFORMANCE. I know some of you C veterans will have some great insight for me!!

    Read the article

  • When encrypting data that is not an even multiple of the block size do I have to send a complete las

    - by WilliamKF
    If I am using a block cipher such as AES which has a block size of 128 bits, what do I do if my data is not an even multiple of 128 bits? I am working with packets of data and do not want to change the size of my packet when encrypting it, yet my data is not an even multiple of 128? Does the AES block cipher allow handling of a final block that is short without changing the size of my message once encrypted?

    Read the article

  • Django Inline formset for editing multiple related records at once - the right way to go?

    - by Bert
    Hi, When using inline formsets, how does one do paging? I'm using django 1.1. The situation I'm in, is that the user needs to be able to edit the related objects quickly and easily (which is why I think I should be using an inline formset). However, there can be a more than a hundred objects to edit, which makes a pretty large formset, so paging would make sense. Is there a better way to be doing this? Thanks Bert

    Read the article

  • Breaking the Outlook 2010 e-mail blue quote line for inline responses

    - by Jez
    This has to be the most infuriating regression from Outlook 2003 to 2007. It also exists the same in Outlook 2010, as far as I can tell. When you reply to an HTML e-mail message in Outlook, the quoted text has a blue line down the side, and is usually at the bottom of the message: Now in Outlook 2003, when replying to HTML-formatted messages in Outlook, you used to be able to reply inline quite easily, by getting to the point in the quoted message you wanted to reply to, and pressing the 'decrease indent' button: Since Outlook 2007 (and 2010), they replaced the e-mail editor with Microsoft Word. This means the blue line is implemented in a different way; it uses a blue left border. This makes it tougher to break the line up. After much ado, I found a couple of pages that said that you could remove all formatting by pressing ctrl-Q, which would remove the blue line next to the cursor and allow inline replies: OK, not too bad on the face of it. I can live with that. But here's the kick in the teeth; try sending that mail. I'll send it to myself. What do I receive? This: Outlook 2010 reinstated the blue line, where I had removed it, upon my sending the e-mail! For God's sake! The two pages I linked to above don't seem to address Outlook's reinstating of the blue line upon sending. So, does anyone know how you can actually reply inline in Outlook 2010 (or Outlook 2007) e-mail without the blue line being reinstated? Before anyone says, I do not want to convert the message to plaintext, and I do not want to just indent replies and have to manually build the blue line myself. I want something like the Outlook 2003 behaviour; I reply, Outlook creates the blue line, and I can break it up with inline replies, send it, and my inline formatting stays. My hopes aren't high - Microsoft seem to have gone to some trouble to actively prevent inline replies here, for some reason - but I'd appreciate anyone's insights. Cheers!

    Read the article

  • How To Block Web Sites at the Router Level for Network Wide Filtering

    - by Jason Fitzpatrick
    A comprehensive network filtering system is overkill if all you want to do is block a handful of web sites. Read on as we show you how—with nothing more than your router—you can selectively block and temporarily restrict individual websites. For many people a massive commercial internet filter is overkill. What if you just want to block Facebook when your kids are supposed to be doing their homework or Reddit when you’re supposed to be getting work done? You don’t need a huge system for that, all you need is the access restrictions module in your router. Today we’re looking at how you can quickly and easily block traffic on your network using router-based access restrictions. HTG Explains: When Do You Need to Update Your Drivers? How to Make the Kindle Fire Silk Browser *Actually* Fast! Amazon’s New Kindle Fire Tablet: the How-To Geek Review

    Read the article

  • Best way to block a country by IP address?

    - by George Edison
    I have a website that needs to block a particular country based on IP address. I am more than aware that IP-based blocking is not a foolproof method for blocking visitors, but it is a necessary step in the right direction. Since I'm using PHP, what I would do is use a GeoIP database like geoplugin.net. However, I'm curious to know if there's a better way of doing this. The website is on a shared webserver (I don't have root access) and it is running Apache on centOS. I guess my question is "can an .htaccess file be configured to block by IP using an external source to lookup IP addresses."

    Read the article

  • HTML5 / CSS3 display:inline

    - by danixd
    I am looking to make a horizontal layout website but having issues with the display: inline rule acting strangely. It seems to be tailored towards inline navigational s, which is nice, but it is causing me massive problems. Here is my code: <div id="container"> About Us Project 1 Project 2 Project 3 Project 4 Project 5 Blog 1 Blog 2 Blog 3 Blog 4 Blog 5 Contact Tweets Comments Links </div> <!--container--> #container{ height: 600px; display: inline; } section{ display: inline; } article{ height: 600px; width: 300px; display: inline; } This is what it looks like: http://danixd.com/archive/html5.html The display:inline completely overwrites the height and width set for the articles in the CSS. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • I have UFW block messages from local network machines, how can I analyse if they are malicious?

    - by Trygve
    I'm getting a lot of messages in my UFW log, and I'm trying to figure out if these are malicious or just normal. A UDP broadcast is coming from a windows laptop x.x.x.191, and some from our synology disks x.x.x.{6,8,10,11}. I have not figured out which macine 114 is yet. I would appreciate some advice in how to read the log, and get the most I can out of these calls. Oct 18 17:03:34 <myusername> kernel: [ 4034.755221] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=f0:de:f1:71:c3:2e:00:11:32:06:e8:19:08:00 SRC=x.x.x.6 DST=x.x.x.169 LEN=364 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=1900 DPT=47978 LEN=344 Oct 18 17:03:34 <myusername> kernel: [ 4034.755292] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=f0:de:f1:71:c3:2e:00:11:32:1b:e8:8f:08:00 SRC=x.x.x.10 DST=x.x.x.169 LEN=366 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=1900 DPT=47978 LEN=346 Oct 18 17:03:34 <myusername> kernel: [ 4034.756444] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=f0:de:f1:71:c3:2e:c0:c1:c0:52:18:ea:08:00 SRC=x.x.x.8 DST=x.x.x.169 LEN=294 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=1900 DPT=47978 LEN=274 Oct 18 17:03:34 <myusername> kernel: [ 4034.756613] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=f0:de:f1:71:c3:2e:c0:c1:c0:52:18:ea:08:00 SRC=x.x.x.8 DST=x.x.x.169 LEN=306 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=1900 DPT=47978 LEN=286 Oct 18 17:03:34 <myusername> kernel: [ 4034.760416] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=f0:de:f1:71:c3:2e:00:11:32:1e:6a:33:08:00 SRC=x.x.x.11 DST=x.x.x.169 LEN=366 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=1900 DPT=47978 LEN=346 Oct 18 17:03:36 <myusername> kernel: [ 4036.215134] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=f0:de:f1:71:c3:2e:00:22:19:de:80:a4:08:00 SRC=x.x.x.191 DST=x.x.x.169 LEN=424 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=128 ID=11155 PROTO=UDP SPT=1900 DPT=47978 LEN=404 Oct 18 17:04:23 <myusername> kernel: [ 4083.853710] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=01:00:5e:7f:ff:fa:00:22:19:de:80:a4:08:00 SRC=x.x.x.191 DST=239.255.255.250 LEN=652 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=1 ID=11247 PROTO=UDP SPT=58930 DPT=3702 LEN=632 Oct 18 17:04:24 <myusername> kernel: [ 4084.063153] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=01:00:5e:7f:ff:fa:00:22:19:de:80:a4:08:00 SRC=x.x.x.191 DST=239.255.255.250 LEN=652 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=1 ID=11299 PROTO=UDP SPT=58930 DPT=3702 LEN=632 Oct 18 17:07:02 <myusername> kernel: [ 4242.153947] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=01:00:5e:7f:ff:fa:00:22:19:de:80:a4:08:00 SRC=x.x.x.191 DST=239.255.255.250 LEN=680 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=1 ID=18702 PROTO=UDP SPT=58930 DPT=3702 LEN=660 Oct 18 17:07:02 <myusername> kernel: [ 4242.275788] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=01:00:5e:7f:ff:fa:00:22:19:de:80:a4:08:00 SRC=x.x.x.191 DST=239.255.255.250 LEN=680 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=1 ID=18703 PROTO=UDP SPT=58930 DPT=3702 LEN=660 Oct 18 17:12:29 <myusername> kernel: [ 4569.073815] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=01:00:5e:7f:ff:fa:00:22:19:de:80:a4:08:00 SRC=x.x.x.191 DST=239.255.255.250 LEN=680 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=1 ID=30102 PROTO=UDP SPT=58930 DPT=3702 LEN=660 Oct 18 17:12:29 <myusername> kernel: [ 4569.242740] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=01:00:5e:7f:ff:fa:00:22:19:de:80:a4:08:00 SRC=x.x.x.191 DST=239.255.255.250 LEN=680 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=1 ID=30103 PROTO=UDP SPT=58930 DPT=3702 LEN=660 Oct 18 17:17:02 <myusername> kernel: [ 4841.440729] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=01:00:5e:7f:ff:fa:00:22:19:de:80:a4:08:00 SRC=x.x.x.191 DST=239.255.255.250 LEN=680 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=1 ID=9195 PROTO=UDP SPT=58930 DPT=3702 LEN=660 Oct 18 17:17:02 <myusername> kernel: [ 4841.553211] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=01:00:5e:7f:ff:fa:00:22:19:de:80:a4:08:00 SRC=x.x.x.191 DST=239.255.255.250 LEN=680 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=1 ID=9196 PROTO=UDP SPT=58930 DPT=3702 LEN=660 Oct 18 17:19:10 <myusername> kernel: [ 4969.294709] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=01:00:5e:7f:ff:fa:00:25:36:26:02:86:08:00 SRC=x.x.x.114 DST=239.255.255.250 LEN=923 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=1 ID=27103 PROTO=UDP SPT=3702 DPT=3702 LEN=903 Oct 18 17:19:10 <myusername> kernel: [ 4969.314553] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=01:00:5e:7f:ff:fa:00:25:36:26:02:86:08:00 SRC=x.x.x.114 DST=239.255.255.250 LEN=923 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=1 ID=27104 PROTO=UDP SPT=3702 DPT=3702 LEN=903 Oct 18 17:33:34 <myusername> kernel: [ 5832.431610] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=f0:de:f1:71:c3:2e:00:11:32:1b:e8:8f:08:00 SRC=x.x.x.10 DST=x.x.x.169 LEN=366 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=1900 DPT=55281 LEN=346 Oct 18 17:33:34 <myusername> kernel: [ 5832.431659] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=f0:de:f1:71:c3:2e:00:11:32:06:e8:19:08:00 SRC=x.x.x.6 DST=x.x.x.169 LEN=364 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=1900 DPT=55281 LEN=344 Oct 18 17:33:34 <myusername> kernel: [ 5832.431865] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=f0:de:f1:71:c3:2e:00:11:32:1e:6a:33:08:00 SRC=x.x.x.11 DST=x.x.x.169 LEN=366 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=1900 DPT=55281 LEN=346 Oct 18 17:33:34 <myusername> kernel: [ 5832.433024] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=f0:de:f1:71:c3:2e:c0:c1:c0:52:18:ea:08:00 SRC=x.x.x.8 DST=x.x.x.169 LEN=294 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=1900 DPT=55281 LEN=274 Oct 18 17:33:34 <myusername> kernel: [ 5832.433224] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=f0:de:f1:71:c3:2e:c0:c1:c0:52:18:ea:08:00 SRC=x.x.x.8 DST=x.x.x.169 LEN=306 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=1900 DPT=55281 LEN=286 Oct 18 17:33:37 <myusername> kernel: [ 5834.914484] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=f0:de:f1:71:c3:2e:00:22:19:de:80:a4:08:00 SRC=x.x.x.191 DST=x.x.x.169 LEN=424 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=128 ID=10075 PROTO=UDP SPT=1900 DPT=55281 LEN=404

    Read the article

  • mounting ext4 fs with block size of 65536

    - by seaquest
    I am doing some benchmarking on EXT4 performance on Compact Flash media. I have created an ext4 fs with block size of 65536. however I can not mount it on ubuntu-10.10-netbook-i386. (it is already mounting ext4 fs with 4096 bytes of block sizes) According to my readings on ext4 it should allow such big block sized fs. I want to hear your comments. root@ubuntu:~# mkfs.ext4 -b 65536 /dev/sda3 Warning: blocksize 65536 not usable on most systems. mke2fs 1.41.12 (17-May-2010) mkfs.ext4: 65536-byte blocks too big for system (max 4096) Proceed anyway? (y,n) y Warning: 65536-byte blocks too big for system (max 4096), forced to continue Filesystem label= OS type: Linux Block size=65536 (log=6) Fragment size=65536 (log=6) Stride=0 blocks, Stripe width=0 blocks 19968 inodes, 19830 blocks 991 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user First data block=0 1 block group 65528 blocks per group, 65528 fragments per group 19968 inodes per group Writing inode tables: done Creating journal (1024 blocks): done Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: done This filesystem will be automatically checked every 37 mounts or 180 days, whichever comes first. Use tune2fs -c or -i to override. root@ubuntu:~# tune2fs -l /dev/sda3 tune2fs 1.41.12 (17-May-2010) Filesystem volume name: <none> Last mounted on: <not available> Filesystem UUID: 4cf3f507-e7b4-463c-be11-5b408097099b Filesystem magic number: 0xEF53 Filesystem revision #: 1 (dynamic) Filesystem features: has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype extent flex_bg sparse_super large_file huge_file uninit_bg dir_nlink extra_isize Filesystem flags: signed_directory_hash Default mount options: (none) Filesystem state: clean Errors behavior: Continue Filesystem OS type: Linux Inode count: 19968 Block count: 19830 Reserved block count: 991 Free blocks: 18720 Free inodes: 19957 First block: 0 Block size: 65536 Fragment size: 65536 Blocks per group: 65528 Fragments per group: 65528 Inodes per group: 19968 Inode blocks per group: 78 Flex block group size: 16 Filesystem created: Sat Feb 5 14:39:55 2011 Last mount time: n/a Last write time: Sat Feb 5 14:40:02 2011 Mount count: 0 Maximum mount count: 37 Last checked: Sat Feb 5 14:39:55 2011 Check interval: 15552000 (6 months) Next check after: Thu Aug 4 14:39:55 2011 Lifetime writes: 70 MB Reserved blocks uid: 0 (user root) Reserved blocks gid: 0 (group root) First inode: 11 Inode size: 256 Required extra isize: 28 Desired extra isize: 28 Journal inode: 8 Default directory hash: half_md4 Directory Hash Seed: afb5b570-9d47-4786-bad2-4aacb3b73516 Journal backup: inode blocks root@ubuntu:~# mount -t ext4 /dev/sda3 /mnt/ mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda3, missing codepage or helper program, or other error In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try dmesg | tail or so

    Read the article

  • Telerik RadEditor for MOSS - How do I suppress min-width inline CSS?

    - by James
    I'm having an issue with the RadEditor for MOSS, I'm really baffled as to the source of this issue. I tried using Firebug to find where any min-* CSS settings are happening and search came up empty, but I know it's happening because the downloaded page markup does not have that inline CSS. I believe that one of the Telerik control emitted Javascripts is what is adding inline CSS style to the top level div of the editor, namely min-height, min-width. This is causing layout issues on my page. My question is why is it doing this, and more importantly how do I prevent this from happening? <div style="height: 300px; width: 100%; min-height: 300px; min-width: 1133px;" class="RadEditor Default reWrapper ms-input"> Related thread

    Read the article

  • How do you code up a pattern matching code block in scala?

    - by egervari
    How do you code a function that takes in a block of code as a parameter that contains case statements? For instance, in my block of code, I don't want to do a match or a default case explicitly. I am looking something like this myApi { case Whatever() => // code for case 1 case SomethingElse() => // code for case 2 } And inside of my myApi(), it'll actually execute the code block and do the matches. Help?

    Read the article

  • How to inline a function for only release build.

    - by Benjamin
    // common.h // This is foo funtion. It has a body. __inline void foo() { /* something */ } // a.cpp #include "common.h" // for foo function // Call foo // b.cpp #include "common.h" // for foo function // Call foo I would like to inline the foo function only when I build for release. -I dont want to inline functions for Debug build. I tried it but linker errors annoyed me. In this case, foo function's body is defined in common.h header file. so if I just do //common.h #if !defined(_DEBUG) __inline #endif void foo() { /* something */ } I will be met a link error in DEBUG build. Because two modules try to include common.h. I have no idea to solve it. Is it possible?

    Read the article

  • Is there a way to pass a regex capture to a block in Ruby?

    - by Gordon Fontenot
    I have a hash with a regex for the key and a block for the value. Something like the following: { 'test (.+?)' => { puts $1 } } Not exactly like that, obviously, since the block is being stored as a Proc, but that's the idea. I then have a regex match later on that looks a lot like this hash.each do |pattern, action| if /#{pattern}/i.match(string) action.call end end The idea was to store the block away in the hash to make it a bit easier for me to expand upon in the future, but now the regex capture doesn't get passed to the block. Is there a way to do this cleanly that would support any number of captures I put in the regex (as in, some regex patterns may have 1 capture, others may have 3)?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14  | Next Page >