Search Results

Search found 415 results on 17 pages for 'proxies'.

Page 7/17 | < Previous Page | 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14  | Next Page >

  • Doctrine 2 Cannot find entites

    - by Flyn San
    I'm using Kohana 3 and have a /doctrine/Entites folder with my entities inside. When executing the code $product = Doctrine::em()->find('Entities\Product', 1); in my controller, I get the error class_parents(): Class Entities\Product does not exist and could not be loaded Below is the Controller (classes/controller/welcome.php): <?php class Controller_Welcome extends Controller { public function action_index() { $prod = Doctrine::em()->find('Entities\Product', 1); } } Below is the Entity (/doctrine/Entities/Product.php): <?php /** * @Entity * @Table{name="products"} */ class Product { /** @Id @Column{type="integer"} */ private $id; /** @Column(type="string", length="255") */ private $name; public function getId() { return $this->id; } public function setId($id) { $this->id = intval($id); } public function getName() { return $this->name; } public function setName($name) { $this->name = $name; } } Below is the Doctrine module bootstrap file (/modules/doctrine/init.php): class Doctrine { private static $_instance = null; private $_application_mode = 'development'; private $_em = null; public static function em() { if ( self::$_instance === null ) self::$_instance = new Doctrine(); return self::$_instance->_em; } public function __construct() { require __DIR__.'/classes/doctrine/Doctrine/Common/ClassLoader.php'; $classLoader = new \Doctrine\Common\ClassLoader('Doctrine', __DIR__.'/classes/doctrine'); $classLoader->register(); $classLoader = new \Doctrine\Common\ClassLoader('Symfony', __DIR__.'/classes/doctrine/Doctrine'); $classLoader->register(); $classLoader = new \Doctrine\Common\ClassLoader('Entities', APPPATH.'doctrine'); $classLoader->register(); //Set up caching method $cache = $this->_application_mode == 'development' ? new \Doctrine\Common\Cache\ArrayCache : new \Doctrine\Common\Cache\ApcCache; $config = new Configuration; $config->setMetadataCacheImpl( $cache ); $driver = $config->newDefaultAnnotationDriver( APPPATH.'doctrine/Entities' ); $config->setMetadataDriverImpl( $driver ); $config->setQueryCacheImpl( $cache ); $config->setProxyDir( APPPATH.'doctrine/Proxies' ); $config->setProxyNamespace('Proxies'); $config->setAutoGenerateProxyClasses( $this->_application_mode == 'development' ); $dbconf = Kohana::config('database'); $dbconf = reset($dbconf); //Use the first database specified in the config $this->_em = EntityManager::create(array( 'dbname' => $dbconf['connection']['database'], 'user' => $dbconf['connection']['username'], 'password' => $dbconf['connection']['password'], 'host' => $dbconf['connection']['hostname'], 'driver' => 'pdo_mysql', ), $config); } } Any ideas what I've done wrong?

    Read the article

  • the HTTP request is unauthorized with client authentication scheme 'Anonymous'

    - by user1246429
    I use firstdata webservice API.I use C# client call firstdata webservice API with WCF. But show error message: "But show error message "System.ServiceModel.Security.MessageSecurityException: The HTTP request is unauthorized with client authentication scheme 'Anonymous'. The authentication header received from the server was ''. --- System.Net.WebException: The remote server returned an error: (401) Unauthorized. at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.GetResponse() at System.ServiceModel.Channels.HttpChannelFactory.HttpRequestChannel.HttpChannelRequest.WaitForReply(TimeSpan timeout) --- End of inner exception stack trace --- Server stack trace: at System.ServiceModel.Channels.HttpChannelUtilities.ValidateAuthentication(HttpWebRequest request, HttpWebResponse response, WebException responseException, HttpChannelFactory factory) at System.ServiceModel.Channels.HttpChannelUtilities.ValidateRequestReplyResponse(HttpWebRequest request, HttpWebResponse response, HttpChannelFactory factory, WebException responseException, ChannelBinding channelBinding) at System.ServiceModel.Channels.HttpChannelFactory.HttpRequestChannel.HttpChannelRequest.WaitForReply(TimeSpan timeout) at System.ServiceModel.Channels.RequestChannel.Request(Message message, TimeSpan timeout) at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.RequestChannelBinder.Request(Message message, TimeSpan timeout) at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.Call(String action, Boolean oneway, ProxyOperationRuntime operation, Object[] ins, Object[] outs, TimeSpan timeout) at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannelProxy.InvokeService(IMethodCallMessage methodCall, ProxyOperationRuntime operation) at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannelProxy.Invoke(IMessage message) Exception rethrown at [0]: at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.HandleReturnMessage(IMessage reqMsg, IMessage retMsg) at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.PrivateInvoke(MessageData& msgData, Int32 type) at com.firstdata.globalgatewaye4.api.ServiceSoap.SendAndCommit(SendAndCommitRequest request) at com.firstdata.globalgatewaye4.api.ServiceSoapClient.com.firstdata.globalgatewaye4.api.ServiceSoap.SendAndCommit (SendAndCommitRequest request) at com.firstdata.globalgatewaye4.api.ServiceSoapClient.SendAndCommit(Transaction SendAndCommitSource)" My web.config info below: <behaviors> <endpointBehaviors> <behavior name="FDGGBehavior"> <clientCredentials> <clientCertificate findValue="WS1909642825._.1" storeLocation="LocalMachine" x509FindType="FindBySubjectName" storeName="TrustedPeople" /> <serviceCertificate> <authentication certificateValidationMode="PeerTrust" /> </serviceCertificate> </clientCredentials> </behavior> </endpointBehaviors> </behaviors> <binding name="ServiceSoap" closeTimeout="00:01:00" openTimeout="00:01:00" receiveTimeout="00:10:00" sendTimeout="00:01:00" allowCookies="false" bypassProxyOnLocal="false" hostNameComparisonMode="StrongWildcard" maxBufferSize="65536" maxBufferPoolSize="524288" maxReceivedMessageSize="65536" messageEncoding="Text" textEncoding="utf-8" transferMode="Buffered" useDefaultWebProxy="true"> <readerQuotas maxDepth="32" maxStringContentLength="8192" maxArrayLength="16384" maxBytesPerRead="4096" maxNameTableCharCount="16384" /> <security mode="TransportWithMessageCredential"> <transport clientCredentialType="Certificate" proxyCredentialType="Ntlm" /> <message clientCredentialType="UserName" algorithmSuite="Default" /> </security> </binding> <endpoint address="https://api.globalgatewaye4.firstdata.com/transaction/v11" binding="basicHttpBinding" bindingConfiguration="ServiceSoap" contract="com.firstdata.globalgatewaye4.api.ServiceSoap" name="ServiceSoap" behaviorConfiguration="FDGGBehavior" /> How can resolve question?

    Read the article

  • What am I missing about WCF?

    - by Bigtoe
    I've been developing in MS technologies for longer than I care to remember at this stage. When .NET arrived on the scene I thought they hit the nail on the head and with each iteration and version I thought their technologies were getting stronger and stronger and looked forward to each release. However, having had to work with WCF for the last year I must say I found the technology very difficult to work with and understand. Initially it's quite appealing but when you start getting into the guts of it, configuration is a nightmare, having to override behaviours for message sizes, number of objects contained in a messages, the complexity of the security model, disposing of proxies when faulted and finally moving back to defining interfaces in code rather than in XML. It just does not work out of the box and I think it should. We found all of the above issues while either testing ourselves or else when our products were out on site. I do understand the rationale behind it all, but surely they could have come up with simpler implementation mechanism. I suppose what I'm asking is, Am I looking at WCF the wrong way? What strengths does it have over the alternatives? Under what circumstances should I choose to use WCF? OK Folks, Sorry about the delay in responding, work does have a nasty habbit of get in the way somethimes :) Some clarifications My main paint point with WCF I suppose falls down into the following areas While it does work out of the box, your left with some major surprises under the hood. As pointed out above basic things are restricted until they are overridden Size of string than can be passed can't be over 8K Number of objects that can be passed in a single message is restricted Proxies not automatically recovering from failures The amount of configuration while it's there is a good thing, but understanding it all and what to use what and under which circumstances can be difficult to understand. Especially when deploying software on site with different security requirements etc. When talking about configuration, we've had to hide lots of ours in a back-end database because security and network people on-site were trying to change things in configuration files without understanding it. Keeping the configuration of the interfaces in code rather than moving to explicitly defined interfaces in XML, which can be published and consumed by almost anything. I know we can export the XML from the assembley, but it's full of rubbish and certain code generators choke on it. I know the world moves on, I've moved on a number of times over the last (ahem 22 years I've been developing) and am actively using WCF, so don't get me wrong, I do understand what it's for and where it's heading. I just think there should be simplier configuration/deployment options available, easier set-up and better management for configuration (SQL config provider maybe, rahter than just the web.config/app.config files). OK, back to the daily grid. Thanks for all your replies so far. Kind Regards Noel

    Read the article

  • Up to date, JPA compliant GenericDAO Implementation

    - by HDave
    I read this article: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-genericdao.html several times and believe I understand what it is saying. However, it is 4 years old and I have a JPA compliant Java application to contend with. In addition, I see that there is a JPATemplate in Spring that has some good functionality, but the Spring documentation says it is already deprecated! Can anybody point me to a solid, modern, JPA compliant, Spring based, working example of a GenericDAOImpl that proxies an Interface to provide generic finder execution?

    Read the article

  • Castle Windsor XML configuration for WCF proxy using WCF Integration Facility

    - by andreyg
    Hi everybody! Currently, we use programming registration of WCF proxies in Windsor container using WCF Integration Facility. For example: container.Register( Component.For<CalculatorSoap>() .Named("calculatorSoap") .LifeStyle.Transient .ActAs(new DefaultClientModel { Endpoint = WcfEndpoint.FromConfiguration("CalculatorSoap").LogMessages() } ) ); Is there any way to do the same via Windsor XML configuration file. I can't find any sample of this on google. Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Hibernate proxy serialization and receive on client side.

    - by Bubba88
    I lack understanding of how does the generated proxy class object (CGLib enhanced POJO) is transferred to the remote client and still pertains its ability to generate Lazy Init. Exceptions. Does that mean that there is some kind of contract that all the transferred objects of some kind of class (a proxy) will be reinstantiated as proxies again? Where does the client obtain those generated classes? Sorry, but I totally do not understand.

    Read the article

  • How to make a parameter optional in WSDL?

    - by user305069
    I have a WebService API which needs 2 of its parameters to be optional in the WSDL public wsProxy[] Insert(wsProxy[] proxies, string loginname, string password, bool returnNewData) { //code here } I need to a way to show loginname and password as optional in the WSDL. Is there any way to do this in C#. Can I maybe add an tag in front of the parameters like this [optional]loginname? I have been looking around but haven't been able to find anything so far.

    Read the article

  • Java method missing (ala Ruby) for decorating?

    - by cibercitizen1
    Is there any technique available in Java for intercepting messages (method calls) like the method_missing technique in Ruby? This would allow coding decorators and proxies very easily, like in Ruby: :Client p:Proxy im:Implementation ------- ---------- ----------------- p.foo() -------> method_missing() do_something im.foo() ------------------> do_foo p.bar() --------> method_missing() do_something_more im.bar() -------------------> do_bar (Note: Proxy only has one method: method_missing())

    Read the article

  • WCF Troubleshooting from ASP.NET Client -- Help!

    - by Kobojunkie
    I am trying to call a method in my service that is as below, from an ASP.NET application. public bool ValidateUser(string username, string password) { try { // String CurrentLoggedInWindowsUserName = WindowsIdentity.GetCurrent().Name; // //primary identity of the call // String CurrentServiceSecurityContextPrimaryIdentityName = // ServiceSecurityContext.Current.PrimaryIdentity.Name; // } catch (Exception ex) { FaultExceptionFactory fct = new FaultExceptionFactory(); throw new FaultException<CustomFaultException>(fct.CreateFaultException(ex)); } return false; } The Config for the client end of my service is as below <binding name="WSHttpBinding_IMembershipService" closeTimeout="00:01:00" openTimeout="00:01:00" receiveTimeout="00:10:00" sendTimeout="00:01:00" bypassProxyOnLocal="false" transactionFlow="false" hostNameComparisonMode="StrongWildcard" maxBufferPoolSize="524288" maxReceivedMessageSize="65536" messageEncoding="Text" textEncoding="utf-8" useDefaultWebProxy="false" allowCookies="false"> <readerQuotas maxDepth="32" maxStringContentLength="8192" maxArrayLength="16384" maxBytesPerRead="4096" maxNameTableCharCount="16384" /> <reliableSession ordered="true" inactivityTimeout="00:10:00" enabled="false" /> <security mode="Message"> <transport clientCredentialType="Windows" proxyCredentialType="None" realm="" /> <message clientCredentialType="Windows" negotiateServiceCredential="true" algorithmSuite="Default" establishSecurityContext="true" /> </security> </binding> Problem I keep having is when I call it; I get the following exception message. Server Error in '/' Application. The communication object, System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel, cannot be used for communication because it is in the Faulted state. Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.ServiceModel.CommunicationObjectFaultedException: The communication object, System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel, cannot be used for communication because it is in the Faulted state. Stack Trace: [CommunicationObjectFaultedException: The communication object, System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel, cannot be used for communication because it is in the Faulted state.] System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.HandleReturnMessage(IMessage reqMsg, IMessage retMsg) +7596735 System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.PrivateInvoke(MessageData& msgData, Int32 type) +275 System.ServiceModel.ICommunicationObject.Close(TimeSpan timeout) +0 System.ServiceModel.ClientBase`1.System.ServiceModel.ICommunicationObject. Close(TimeSpan timeout) +142 System.ServiceModel.ClientBase`1.Close() +38 System.ServiceModel.ClientBase`1.System.IDisposable.Dispose() +4 Controls.Membership.accountLogin.ValidateUserCredentials(String UserName, String Password) in C:\ Petition.WebClient\Controls\ Membership\accountLogin.ascx.cs:49 Controls.Membership.accountLogin.Login1_Authenticate(Object sender, AuthenticateEventArgs e) in C:\ WebClient\ Controls\Membership \accountLogin.ascx.cs:55 I am not entirely sure why I keep getting this. Just in case, here is how I call my service from the client private bool ValidateUserCredentials(string UserName, string Password) { bool boolReturnValue = false; using(Members.MembershipServiceClient client = new Controls.Members.MembershipServiceClient()) { try { boolReturnValue = client.ValidateUser(UserName, Password); } catch (FaultException<CustomFaultException> ex) { throw ex; } } return boolReturnValue; } Anyone have any idea what I need to do in this case?

    Read the article

  • Up to date, JPA compliant GenericDAOImplementation

    - by HDave
    I read this article: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-genericdao.html several times and believe I understand what it is saying. However, it is 4 years old and I have a JPA compliant Java application to contend with. In addition, I see that there is a JPATemplate in Spring that has some good functionality, but the Spring documentation says it is already deprecated! Can anybody point me to a solid, modern, JPA compliant, Spring based, working example of a GenericDAOImpl that proxies an Interface to provide generic finder execution?

    Read the article

  • Uses of the Apache commons-proxy library?

    - by Adrian
    I'm looking at the Apache commons-proxy library to implement some Proxy patterns in my current project. The Javadocs are all very well, but I'd really like to see some tutorials or just a project that uses the library so I can get more of a feel for it. Alas, searching for such things just tends to net you a lot of pages about setting up HTTP proxies using Apache. So I'm hoping that people here can help me.

    Read the article

  • Castel Windsor XML configuration for WCF proxy using WCF Integration Facility

    - by andreyg
    Hi everybody! Currently, we use programming registration of WCF proxies in Windsor container using WCF Integration Facility. For example: container.Register( Component.For<CalculatorSoap>() .Named("calculatorSoap") .LifeStyle.Transient .ActAs(new DefaultClientModel { Endpoint = WcfEndpoint.FromConfiguration("CalculatorSoap").LogMessages() } ) ); Is there any way to do the same via Windsor XML configuration file. I can't find any sample of this on google. Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • C#/VB.Net Web Browser Control Replacement

    - by Lienau
    I've been working on a project that requires that I can go around webpages with different proxies, user-agents, and clear cookies. Now after looking all around the net, it looks like there are some solutions for each of these, but I can never get them working. I was wondering if there was a wrapper for this control that fixed all of these problems or even just a different control I could include. Thanks. Edit: I tried using HTTPWebRequest, it has everything I need -Javascript

    Read the article

  • How do I set up my own proxy server?

    - by NJTechGuy
    This website (abc.com) slowed access from our original IP address. How do I implement my own proxy server to hide my IP while browsing abc.com? Do I need special hardware/software combo to achieve this? If I can generate about 5 proxies and alternate amongst those 5 while browsing abc.com would be awesome. Please suggest. Thanks guys!

    Read the article

  • How to use a Proxy with Youtube API? (Python)

    - by Kate
    Hi, I'm working a script that will upload videos to YouTube with different accounts. Is there a way to use HTTPS or SOCKS proxies to filter all the requests. My client doesn't want to leave any footprints for Google. The only way I found was to set the proxy environment variable beforehand but this seems cumbersome. Is there some way I'm missing? Thanks :)

    Read the article

  • What components have you built that you are reusing over and over again for your desktop application

    - by Jason
    We are building our internal library of components up, and was wondering what everybody has in their library of reusable components for your organization, for desktop applications. Our list currently includes only a couple of components: Logon, Security and User Group functionality System Tray / Service Framework Component for Internet Communications (to handle proxies, security, etc...) Billing What else do you have, that we should add to our list? If you have reusable web components, save your answers... I will open a different question if this one is successful.

    Read the article

  • Mac OS X bypass proxy for certain domains

    - by Brian
    In college I'm behind a proxy. When I try to visit one of my local Apache virtual hosts behind the proxy, then my college DNS attempts to resolve the host, thus bypassing my local host file. In the advanced setting for proxies you seem to be able to enter values into "Bypass proxy settings for these Hosts & Domains". I added the last 2 to the end - "*.local, 169.254/16, *.dev, *.sb". But it doesn't work. Is there a solution?

    Read the article

  • How to tell if mod_deflate is actually working?

    - by Jayraj
    I have put the following in my http.conf file: # mod_deflate configuration <IfModule mod_deflate.c> # Restrict compression to these MIME types AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/plain AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE application/xhtml+xml AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/xml AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE application/xml AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE application/x-javascript AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/javascript AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/css # Level of compression (Highest 9 - Lowest 1) DeflateCompressionLevel 9 # Netscape 4.x has some problems. BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4 gzip-only-text/html # Netscape 4.06-4.08 have some more problems BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4\.0[678] no-gzip # MSIE masquerades as Netscape, but it is fine BrowserMatch \bMSI[E] !no-gzip !gzip-only-text/html <IfModule mod_headers.c> # Make sure proxies don't deliver the wrong content Header append Vary User-Agent env=!dont-vary </IfModule> </IfModule> My content doesn't return with a Content-Encoding of type gzip, but I find myself getting a lot more 304s and the Etag is appended with a +gzip suffix. Is mod_deflate actually doing its job? (Sorry about the n00b-ishness)

    Read the article

  • Load balancing and HTTPS strategies

    - by Dan
    I am faced with the following problem: Servers get saturated since current load balancing strategy is based on client IP. Some corporate clients access our servers from behind large proxies so all clients appear with same IP to our load balancer. I think we are using some hardware load balancing device (can investigate further if necessary). We need to maintain session affinity (site is constructed in ASP), so all requests with same IP get routed to the same node. Since all the communication goes over the HTTPS, no request data (like session Id) is available to balancer as a client discriminator. Is there a way to use some other data besides the IP to distinguish between clients and route the clients even when coming from same IP to different nodes? Note: I need to maintain the traffic between the balancer and nodes safe (encrypted).

    Read the article

  • Browser won't connect to svn server

    - by devpi
    This has been driving me nuts. For some reason, I can't access my svn repository using a browser in this laptop that I'm using right now (firefox & ie) The connection just times out. I'm at home right now and the server is in another room. It connects OK there and it also connects OK in my virtual machine in this same laptop. I'm pretty stumped right now and can't figure out why this is happening. I've also checked the proxies and I'm 100% sure I'm not using any at all. The virtual machine running on this laptop is XP 32bit and this one is a Win7 64 bit. Thanks

    Read the article

  • email handling with inbox.py and nginx

    - by Matt Ball
    I have a Flask web application running behind gunicorn and Nginx. Nginx proxies any traffic to ivrhub.org to the correct flask app. I would very much like to use inbox.py to process some incoming email. Running inbox.py's example on my server and then sending an email to [email protected] does not work as I intended. The inbox.py server does not seem to receive anything but the email also does not bounce. I'm missing something conceptually -- is there a DNS setting I need to configure or something I need to adjust with Nginx?

    Read the article

  • Pidgin not working with Gtalk

    - by Selvakumar Ponnusamy
    I have downloaded latest Pidgin(version 2.10.6) for Windows and tried to gtalk account to it. It shows "not authorized" error. I have tried many options given in the net and its not working for me, Below are the values I have given, Basic Tab: Protocal: XMPP Username: <my username> Domain: gmail.com Password: <My Password> and enabled Remember password check box Advanced Tab: Connection security: Require Encryption (Default) Unhecked "Allow plaintext auth over unencrypted streams" (Default) Connection Port: 5222 (Default) Connect server: talk.google.com File Transfer proxies: proxy.eu.jabber.org (default) BOSH URL: <Empty> (default) I enabled two step verification process for my gmail account, So I created application specific password and given here. But Its not working. Please help me what could be the problem and how to resolve it?

    Read the article

  • Windows Load-Balancing, Forward-Proxying Software

    - by LandonC
    Does anyone know of any Windows software that will do forward-proxying load-balancing, like HAProxy does? There are tons of reverse-proxy solutions, but I can't find any that do what HAProxy does, that is, allows you to load-balance a group of forwarding-proxies. I have a proxy farm (don't ask) that I need to round-robin balance. HAProxy will do it, but is very unstable on Windows. Thoughts? I'd really appreciate it. And yes, this is an actual, production environment question.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14  | Next Page >