Search Results

Search found 7082 results on 284 pages for 'trs 80'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 7/284 | < Previous Page | 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14  | Next Page >

  • Is this DoS attack

    - by Joyce Babu
    I am seeing a huge number of connections from a single IP. # netstat -alpn | grep :80 | grep 92.98.64.103 tcp 0 0 my.ip.address.x:80 92.98.64.103:45629 TIME_WAIT - tcp 0 0 my.ip.address.x:80 92.98.64.103:44288 TIME_WAIT - tcp 0 0 my.ip.address.x:80 92.98.64.103:48783 TIME_WAIT - tcp 0 0 my.ip.address.x:80 92.98.64.103:40531 TIME_WAIT - tcp 0 0 my.ip.address.x:80 92.98.64.103:54094 TIME_WAIT - tcp 0 0 my.ip.address.x:80 92.98.64.103:47394 TIME_WAIT - tcp 0 0 my.ip.address.x:80 92.98.64.103:43495 TIME_WAIT - tcp 0 0 my.ip.address.x:80 92.98.64.103:55429 TIME_WAIT - tcp 0 0 my.ip.address.x:80 92.98.64.103:42993 TIME_WAIT - tcp 0 0 my.ip.address.x:80 92.98.64.103:49542 TIME_WAIT - tcp 0 0 my.ip.address.x:80 92.98.64.103:54812 TIME_WAIT - There are 419 such lines. But I see only 1 request from 92.98.64.103 in my access log. Is this DoS attack?

    Read the article

  • how to set php SERVER_PORT var to 80, behind varnish?

    - by Daniel
    how to force php to read SERVER_PORT as 80, when apache listens on 8080 and varnish listens on 80 ?? if my apache vhost is set to 8080, SERVER_PORT will always be 8080, this is troubling me a little since in many parts of the application some links are calculated with SERVER_NAME and SERVER_PORT together, .. so what I need is that php "believes" that SERVER_PORT is 80, so all links will pass trough varnish regards Daniel

    Read the article

  • Other processes take over port 80 when restarting Apache - why, and how to solve?

    - by user72149
    I have a CentOS 5.5 server running Apache on port 80 as well as some other applications. All works fine until I for some reason need to restart the httpd process. Doing so returns: sudo /etc/init.d/httpd restart Stopping httpd: [ OK ] Starting httpd: (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address [::]:80 (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address 0.0.0.0:80 no listening sockets available, shutting down Unable to open logs First I thought perhaps httpd had frozen and was still running, but that was not the case. So I ran netstat to find out what was using port 80: sudo netstat -tlp Active Internet connections (only servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name tcp 0 0 *:7203 *:* LISTEN 24012/java tcp 0 0 localhost.localdomain:smux *:* LISTEN 3547/snmpd tcp 0 0 *:mysql *:* LISTEN 21966/mysqld tcp 0 0 *:ssh *:* LISTEN 3562/sshd tcp 0 0 *:http *:* LISTEN 3780/python26 Turns out that my python process had taken over listening to http in the instant that httpd was restarting. So, I killed python and tried starting httpd again - but ran into the same error. Netstat again: sudo netstat -tlp Active Internet connections (only servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name tcp 0 0 *:7203 *:* LISTEN 24012/java tcp 0 0 localhost.localdomain:smux *:* LISTEN 3547/snmpd tcp 0 0 *:mysql *:* LISTEN 21966/mysqld tcp 0 0 *:ssh *:* LISTEN 3562/sshd tcp 0 0 *:http *:* LISTEN 24012/java Now my java process had taken over listening to http. I killed that too and could then successfully restart httpd. But this is a terrible workaround. Why will these python and java processes start listening to port 80 as soon as httpd is restarted? How to solve? Two other comments. 1) Both java and python processes are started by apache from a php script. But when apache is restarted, they should not be affected. And 2) I have the same setup on two other machines running Ubuntu and there's no problem there. Any ideas? Edit: The Java process listens to port 7203 and the python process supposedly doesn't listen to any port. For some reason, they start listening to port 80 when apache is restarted. This hasn't happened before. On Ubuntu it runs fine. For some reason, on my current CentOS 5.5 machine, this problem arises.

    Read the article

  • Google attaque le FISC américain pour avoir trop payé d'impôts en 2004, il réclame le remboursement de plus de 80 millions de dollars de taxes

    Google attaque le FISC américain, il aurait payé trop d'impôts en 2004 Et lui réclame plus de 80 millions de dollarsGoogle vient d'entamer une procédure contre l'U.S. Internal Revenue Service, l'équivalent du FISC, pour récupérer 83.5 millions de dollars qui, d'après le géant d'Internet, lui seraient dûs.Le litige porte sur une opération boursière concernant des warrants (des bons de souscription à fort effet de levier, souvent qualifiés de spéculatifs) lors d'une transaction avec AOL.Les warrants sont des options d'achat - ou de vente - d'un produit sous-jacent (ici des actions de Google) qui permettent à leurs détenteurs (ici AOL) d'acheter - ou de vendre - ce sous-jacent à un prix fixe détermi...

    Read the article

  • Google attaque le FISC américain pour avoir trop payé d'impôts en 1984, il réclame le remboursement de plus de 80 millions de dollars de taxes

    Google attaque le FISC américain, il aurait payé trop d'impôts en 2004 Et lui réclame plus de 80 millions de dollarsGoogle vient d'entamer une procédure contre l'U.S. Internal Revenue Service, l'équivalent du FISC, pour récupérer 83.5 millions de dollars qui, d'après le géant d'Internet, lui seraient dûs.Le litige porte sur une opération boursière concernant des warrants (des bons de souscription à fort effet de levier, souvent qualifiés de spéculatifs) lors d'une transaction avec AOL.Les warrants sont des options d'achat - ou de vente - d'un produit sous-jacent (ici des actions de Google) qui permettent à leurs détenteurs (ici AOL) d'acheter - ou de vendre - ce sous-jacent à un prix fixe détermi...

    Read the article

  • HP présente "Net-Zero Energy DataCenter", une architecture permettant une réduction de 30% de la consommation d'énergie et de 80% des coûts

    HP présente son architecture "Net-Zero Energy DataCenter", permettant une réduction de 30% de la consommation d'énergie et de 80% des coûts et dépendance des réseaux électriques HP vient de présenter son concept d'architecture « Net-Zero Energy » des centres de données économes en énergie, permettant de réduire la dépendance des réseaux électriques traditionnels. La vision de HP est de permettre aux entreprises de faire fonctionner les centres de données avec en utilisant leur propre énergie générée sur place, grâce à des sources renouvelables afin d'éliminer des dépendances comme l'emplacement, l'approvisionnement en énergie et les couts. L'architecture proposée ...

    Read the article

  • Samsung dévoile sa plateforme mobile Bada 2.0, sa boutique d'applications Samsung Apps passe les 80 millions de téléchargement

    Samsung dévoile sa plateforme mobile Bada 2.0 Sa boutique d'applications Samsung Apps passe les 80 millions de téléchargments Le secteur des OS mobiles est en plein ébullition avec les procès (brevets, Oracle Android, etc.) et la décision de Nokia de choisir Windows Phone. Quel avenir pour MeeGo ? Pour Symbian ? Android va-t-il essayer d'exploiter l'affaire (a priori oui) ? Sur ce marché agité, un constructeur est bien loin de tous ces tracas et propose une stratégie multi-plateforme qui semble lui réussir. Samsung possède en effet des modèles sous Android, Windows Phone 7... et sous Bada, sa plateforme maison. Lors du Mobile Word Congress de Barcelone, le Coréen v...

    Read the article

  • "En 2020, 80% des applications tourneront dans le cloud", déclare Microsoft, en expliquant que les DSI devront s'adapter à ces changements

    "En 2020, 80% des applications tourneront dans le cloud", déclare Microsoft, tout en expliquant que les DSI devront s'adapter à ces changements Au premier jour des TechDays 2011, nous avons pu rencontrer Jérôme Trédan, Directeur produits serveurs et infrastructure de cloud computing chez Microsoft France. Sa mission : encadrer une équipe de chefs de produits sur toute les lignes de produits serveurs, dans 3 grands domaines : les infrastructures (Windows Server, System Center et toute l'offre de sécurité de la gamme Forefront) ; l'axe des plateformes applicatives de Microsoft (SQL Server, Biztalk, .Net) ; et la partie infrastructures cloud computing (qui se développe très rapidement avec Windows et SQL Azure).

    Read the article

  • Does having over 80% dynamic and rapidly changing content affect SEO?

    - by webmasters
    I have a website that pulls promotions of products from other website. My index page has a structure similar to this: My Brand - Best Promotions Looking for great deals? Check out our top promotions A menu - listing the promotions categories 20 of the latest promotions (the best ones): I list an image; Promotion description (200 chars); Link to the promotion page. Question: More then 80% of my index page (maybe even 90%) is composed of the 20 promotions I list; these promotions change on a daily bases - which dramatically changes the content of my index page. Does the dynamic changing of the index page affect SEO? Should I try to add more static text where I can? (which won't change) Ty

    Read the article

  • Can I stop battery charging at say 80% and switch to AC?

    - by elim
    While I was looking for a battery management utility for my Dell E5420, I came to read this post - How can I limit battery charging to 80% capacity? . Sofar, I haven't found one that relates to my laptop. So, I wonder now if any battery manager utility can be found for my laptop specified above. I would be happy if someone could point me if such utility is available under Ubuntu 12.04 that can stop charging a battery at a certain percentage and to ONLY use A/C mode. Again, to start using battery mode when the A/C is off or when the battery level reaches at certain level. Thanks for all your help. Elim.

    Read the article

  • apache2: ssl_error_rx_record_too_long when visiting port 80? help!

    - by John
    Hi, I have an Ubuntu 10 x64 server edition machine. I got a second IP and configured /etc/network/interfaces like so (actual IPs and gateways removed): [code] auto lo iface lo inet loopback iface eth0 inet dhcp auto eth0 auto eth0:0 iface eth0 inet static address [ my first IP ] netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway [ my first gateway ] iface eth0:0 inet static address [ my second IP ] netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway [ my second gateway ] [/code] /etc/apache2/ports.conf: [code] Listen 80 NameVirtualHost [ my first IP ]:80 NameVirtualHost [ my second IP ]:80 # If you add NameVirtualHost *:443 here, you will also have to change # the VirtualHost statement in /etc/apache2/sites-available/default-ssl # to # Server Name Indication for SSL named virtual hosts is currently not # supported by MSIE on Windows XP. Listen 443 NameVirtualHost [ my first IP - some site is running SSL successfully using it ]:443 Listen 443 [/code] /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/mysite.conf: [code] ServerName mysite.com Include /var/www/mysite.com/djangoproject/apache/django.conf [/conf] [/code] Then when visiting http[mysite].com:80 or http[mysite].com (:// removed because serverfault doesn't allow me to post hyperlinks), I get: [code] An error occurred during a connection to [mysite].com. SSL received a record that exceeded the maximum permissible length. (Error code: ssl_error_rx_record_too_long) [/code] My guess is that the configuration file is not being picked up, and apache is therefore looking for the default-ssl file, which is not in conf-enabled. If I were to configure that file properly, it seems I would successfully connect to whatever default directory is specified in the default-ssl file. But I want to connect to my website. Any ideas? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Domino HTTP Server: Error - Unable to Bind 1.2.3.4, port 80, port in use or Bind To Host configuration specifies a duplicate IP address/host

    - by pdewaard
    We have a Domino 9.0.1 Server hosted on Ubuntu 14.04 Server, which hosts several other http based Tasks, (Nginx, Couchdb, Confluence on Tomcat). The Ubuntu Server has multiple IPs, all bind correctly to the different Tasks. The Domino SMTP task binds correctly and is working well. All http tasks (other than Domino) are proxied behind Nginx version 1.6x and all are working well, netstat shows no 0.0.0.0 bindings, no one is listening on 1.2.3.4:80 . when I try to load http on the (Domino) server console it failes with HTTP Server: Error - Unable to Bind 1.2.3.4, port 80, port in use or Bind To Host configuration specifies a duplicate IP address/host a couple of times, may be 4 or 5 times then it loads without failure! And: when it comes up, I see http is listening on 80 AND 443, but SSL Connections are not working, nor any error log! It must be a kind of bad magic :-( thanks in advance Pitt

    Read the article

  • Port Forwarding: Why do my local sites on 80 work but not those on 8080?

    - by Chadworthington
    I setup my router to forward port 80 to the PC hosting my web site. As a result, I am able to access this url (Don't bother clicking on it, it's just an example): http://my.url.com/ When i click on this link, it works: http://localhost:8080/tfs/web/ I also forward port 8080 to the same web server box But when I try to access this url I get the eror "Page Cannot be displayed:" http://my.url.com:8080/tfs/web/ I fwded port 8080 the same way I fwded port 80. I also turned off Windows Firewall, in case it was blocking port 8080. Any theories why port 80 works but 8080 does not?

    Read the article

  • Hosting a web site at home: ISP Blocking port 80?

    - by tombull89
    Hello, I presume this is a better place to put this rather than server fault. I'm interested in setting up a small site to host at home as a "proof of concept" exercise, i.e. to prrove that I know how to do it. I've got a (virtual) server 2003 machine with a site on it, all configured with port forwarding through to 80 on my server. I have a Belkin F5D7634 which I have put my DYNDNS details in but when I try to go to my DYNDNS address it comes up with the page cannot be displayed. My ISP is Carphone Warehouse/AOL and I've been unable to find any information if they block port 80. If they do, can anybody reccomend a home provider that does not block port 80? Regards, Tom.

    Read the article

  • 80 Years of Supplier Misinformation: How can Oracle Supplier Hub Help?

    - by Mala Narasimharajan
    By Mark Peachy       Well, we're down to the final week before this year's Oracle Open World conference kicks-off on Sunday and there's still plenty of work to be done to be ready in time.  One of the great benefits I think that attendees get from Open World is the opportunity to listen to other organizations talk about their implementation experiences.  Typically, these sessions provide hugely valuable insights that have been gained during a deployment, delivering a wealth of practical information on what it really takes to get an organization up and running with a new module or a revamped business process.And I'm not just saying this because we're lucky enough to have one of our early implementers join us for this year's Supplier Hub/Supplier Lifecycle Management MDM session!  With a multi-phased deployment underway, this customer is working to fix a long, 80-year history without much in the way of formal processes or tools to manage all of their accumulated supplier information.  Faced with a mess of supplier details, they had been challenged to efficiently track supplier spend, monitor performance, maintain qualification information or carry out meaningful risk analysis.  Join us on Wednesday to hear how they are addressing these issues and the plans they have to evolve their supplier management techniques - it's a great story.CON9242:  Oracle Supplier Lifecycle Management and Oracle Supplier Hub for Better Supply Base Management Wednesday, October 3rd at 1:15 PM                                                                                                                                                InterContinental Hotel, Sutter Suite

    Read the article

  • How to stop a ICMP attack?

    - by cumhur onat
    We are under a heavy icmp flood attack. Tcpdump shows the result below. Altough we have blocked ICMP with iptables tcpdump still prints icmp packets. I've also attached iptables configuration and "top" result. Is there any thing I can do to completely stop icmp packets? [root@server downloads]# tcpdump icmp -v -n -nn tcpdump: listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes 03:02:47.810957 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 49, id 16007, offset 0, flags [none], proto: ICMP (1), length: 56) 80.227.64.183 > 77.92.136.196: ICMP redirect 94.201.175.188 to host 80.227.64.129, length 36 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 124, id 31864, offset 0, flags [none], proto: ICMP (1), length: 76) 77.92.136.196 > 94.201.175.188: [|icmp] 03:02:47.811559 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 49, id 16010, offset 0, flags [none], proto: ICMP (1), length: 56) 80.227.64.183 > 77.92.136.196: ICMP redirect 94.201.175.188 to host 80.227.64.129, length 36 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 52, id 31864, offset 0, flags [none], proto: ICMP (1), length: 76) 77.92.136.196 > 94.201.175.188: [|icmp] 03:02:47.811922 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 49, id 16012, offset 0, flags [none], proto: ICMP (1), length: 56) 80.227.64.183 > 77.92.136.196: ICMP redirect 94.201.175.188 to host 80.227.64.129, length 36 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 122, id 31864, offset 0, flags [none], proto: ICMP (1), length: 76) 77.92.136.196 > 94.201.175.188: [|icmp] 03:02:47.812485 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 49, id 16015, offset 0, flags [none], proto: ICMP (1), length: 56) 80.227.64.183 > 77.92.136.196: ICMP redirect 94.201.175.188 to host 80.227.64.129, length 36 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 126, id 31864, offset 0, flags [none], proto: ICMP (1), length: 76) 77.92.136.196 > 94.201.175.188: [|icmp] 03:02:47.812613 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 49, id 16016, offset 0, flags [none], proto: ICMP (1), length: 56) 80.227.64.183 > 77.92.136.196: ICMP redirect 94.201.175.188 to host 80.227.64.129, length 36 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 122, id 31864, offset 0, flags [none], proto: ICMP (1), length: 76) 77.92.136.196 > 94.201.175.188: [|icmp] 03:02:47.812992 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 49, id 16018, offset 0, flags [none], proto: ICMP (1), length: 56) 80.227.64.183 > 77.92.136.196: ICMP redirect 94.201.175.188 to host 80.227.64.129, length 36 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 122, id 31864, offset 0, flags [none], proto: ICMP (1), length: 76) 77.92.136.196 > 94.201.175.188: [|icmp] 03:02:47.813582 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 49, id 16020, offset 0, flags [none], proto: ICMP (1), length: 56) 80.227.64.183 > 77.92.136.196: ICMP redirect 94.201.175.188 to host 80.227.64.129, length 36 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 52, id 31864, offset 0, flags [none], proto: ICMP (1), length: 76) 77.92.136.196 > 94.201.175.188: [|icmp] 03:02:47.814092 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 49, id 16023, offset 0, flags [none], proto: ICMP (1), length: 56) 80.227.64.183 > 77.92.136.196: ICMP redirect 94.201.175.188 to host 80.227.64.129, length 36 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 120, id 31864, offset 0, flags [none], proto: ICMP (1), length: 76) 77.92.136.196 > 94.201.175.188: [|icmp] 03:02:47.814233 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 49, id 16024, offset 0, flags [none], proto: ICMP (1), length: 56) 80.227.64.183 > 77.92.136.196: ICMP redirect 94.201.175.188 to host 80.227.64.129, length 36 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 120, id 31864, offset 0, flags [none], proto: ICMP (1), length: 76) 77.92.136.196 > 94.201.175.188: [|icmp] 03:02:47.815579 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 49, id 16025, offset 0, flags [none], proto: ICMP (1), length: 56) 80.227.64.183 > 77.92.136.196: ICMP redirect 94.201.175.188 to host 80.227.64.129, length 36 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 50, id 31864, offset 0, flags [none], proto: ICMP (1), length: 76) 77.92.136.196 > 94.201.175.188: [|icmp] 03:02:47.815726 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 49, id 16026, offset 0, flags [none], proto: ICMP (1), length: 56) 80.227.64.183 > 77.92.136.196: ICMP redirect 94.201.175.188 to host 80.227.64.129, length 36 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 50, id 31864, offset 0, flags [none], proto: ICMP (1), length: 76) 77.92.136.196 > 94.201.175.188: [|icmp] 03:02:47.815890 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 49, id 16027, offset 0, flags [none], proto: ICMP (1), length: 56) 80.227.64.183 > 77.92.136.196: ICMP redirect 94.201.175.188 to host 80.227.64.129, length 36 iptables configuration: [root@server etc]# iptables -L Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination ofis tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:mysql ofis tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:ftp DROP icmp -- anywhere anywhere Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination DROP icmp -- anywhere anywhere Chain ofis (2 references) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT all -- OUR_OFFICE_IP anywhere DROP all -- anywhere anywhere top: top - 03:12:19 up 400 days, 15:43, 3 users, load average: 1.49, 1.67, 2.61 Tasks: 751 total, 3 running, 748 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 8.2%us, 1.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 87.9%id, 2.1%wa, 0.1%hi, 0.7%si, 0.0%st Mem: 32949948k total, 26906844k used, 6043104k free, 4707676k buffers Swap: 10223608k total, 0k used, 10223608k free, 14255584k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 36 root 39 19 0 0 0 R 100.8 0.0 17:03.56 ksoftirqd/11 10552 root 15 0 11408 1460 676 R 5.7 0.0 0:00.04 top 7475 lighttpd 15 0 304m 22m 15m S 3.8 0.1 0:05.37 php-cgi 1294 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 1.9 0.0 380:54.73 kjournald 3574 root 15 0 631m 11m 5464 S 1.9 0.0 0:00.65 node 7766 lighttpd 16 0 302m 19m 14m S 1.9 0.1 0:05.70 php-cgi 10237 postfix 15 0 52572 2216 1692 S 1.9 0.0 0:00.02 scache 1 root 15 0 10372 680 572 S 0.0 0.0 0:07.99 init 2 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:16.72 migration/0 3 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.06 ksoftirqd/0 4 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/0 5 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 1:10.46 migration/1 6 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:01.11 ksoftirqd/1 7 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/1 8 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 2:36.15 migration/2 9 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.19 ksoftirqd/2 10 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/2 11 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 3:48.91 migration/3 12 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.20 ksoftirqd/3 13 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/3 uname -a [root@server etc]# uname -a Linux thisis.oursite.com 2.6.18-238.19.1.el5 #1 SMP Fri Jul 15 07:31:24 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux arp -an [root@server downloads]# arp -an ? (77.92.136.194) at 00:25:90:04:F0:90 [ether] on eth0 ? (192.168.0.2) at 00:25:90:04:F0:91 [ether] on eth1 ? (77.92.136.193) at 00:23:9C:0B:CD:01 [ether] on eth0

    Read the article

  • Mail server not sending or receiving after removal from barracuda blacklist to white list

    - by user137765
    Mail server not sending or receiving after removal from barracuda blacklist to white list. I've checked against black lists and the ip and domain are clean. 1and1 are saying its Barracuda black list and barracuda are saying its not blacklisted and that its somethign with 1and1 server. section from log file... Sep 20 04:29:25 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[16906]: connect from mta860.chtah.net[63.236.31.146] Sep 20 04:29:25 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[16070]: connect from host81-136-144-117.in-addr.btopenworld.com[81.136.144.117] Sep 20 04:29:27 vegaserve pop3d: IMAP connect from @ [201.80.253.153]checkmailpasswd: FAILED: raidon - short names not allowed from @ [201.80.253.153]ERR: 1348111767.185119 LOGOUT, [email protected], ip=[86.143.136.249], top=0, retr=0, time=151, rcvd=18, sent=283, maildir=/var/qmail/mailnames/mbelectrics.net/mb/Maildir Sep 20 04:29:28 vegaserve pop3d: LOGIN FAILED, ip=[201.80.253.153] Sep 20 04:29:28 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[15388]: connect from mta965.emails.itv.com[8.30.201.55] Sep 20 04:29:29 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[18194]: warning: connect to proxy service 127.0.0.1:10025: Connection timed out Sep 20 04:29:29 vegaserve postfix/cleanup[24879]: 95CB31E87556C: message-id=<[email protected] Sep 20 04:29:29 vegaserve postfix/qmgr[14378]: 95CB31E87556C: from=, size=975, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Sep 20 04:29:29 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[18194]: disconnect from uspmta172097.emarsys.net[195.54.172.97] Sep 20 04:29:29 vegaserve postfix/smtp[25748]: 95CB31E87556C: to=, orig_to=, relay=none, delay=0.05, delays=0.05/0/0/0, dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail for vegaserve.com loops back to myself) Sep 20 04:29:29 vegaserve postfix/bounce[25897]: warning: 95CB31E87556C: undeliverable postmaster notification discarded Sep 20 04:29:29 vegaserve postfix/qmgr[14378]: 95CB31E87556C: removed Sep 20 04:29:32 vegaserve pop3d: Connection, ip=[201.80.253.153] Sep 20 04:29:37 vegaserve pop3d: IMAP connect from @ [201.80.253.153]checkmailpasswd: FAILED: rei - short names not allowed from @ [201.80.253.153]ERR: LOGIN FAILED, ip=[201.80.253.153] Sep 20 04:29:38 vegaserve pop3d: Connection, ip=[201.80.253.153] Sep 20 04:29:38 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[19328]: warning: connect to proxy service 127.0.0.1:10025: Connection timed out Sep 20 04:29:40 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[18331]: warning: connect to proxy service 127.0.0.1:10025: Connection timed out Sep 20 04:29:40 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[24464]: warning: connect to proxy service 127.0.0.1:10025: Connection timed out Sep 20 04:29:40 vegaserve postfix/cleanup[24825]: BD1A71E87556C: message-id=<[email protected] Sep 20 04:29:40 vegaserve postfix/qmgr[14378]: BD1A71E87556C: from=, size=673, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Sep 20 04:29:40 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[24464]: disconnect from unknown[118.97.212.190] Sep 20 04:29:40 vegaserve postfix/smtp[25748]: BD1A71E87556C: to=, orig_to=, relay=none, delay=0.04, delays=0.04/0/0/0, dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail for vegaserve.com loops back to myself) Sep 20 04:29:40 vegaserve postfix/bounce[25995]: warning: BD1A71E87556C: undeliverable postmaster notification discarded Sep 20 04:29:40 vegaserve postfix/qmgr[14378]: BD1A71E87556C: removed Sep 20 04:29:41 vegaserve postfix/cleanup[24879]: 0A42B1E87556C: message-id=<[email protected] Sep 20 04:29:41 vegaserve postfix/qmgr[14378]: 0A42B1E87556C: from=, size=961, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Sep 20 04:29:41 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[18331]: disconnect from bay0-omc4-s10.bay0.hotmail.com[65.54.190.212] Sep 20 04:29:41 vegaserve postfix/smtp[25748]: 0A42B1E87556C: to=, orig_to=, relay=none, delay=0.03, delays=0.03/0/0/0, dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail for vegaserve.com loops back to myself) Sep 20 04:29:41 vegaserve postfix/bounce[25897]: warning: 0A42B1E87556C: undeliverable postmaster notification discarded Sep 20 04:29:41 vegaserve postfix/qmgr[14378]: 0A42B1E87556C: removed Sep 20 04:29:43 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[17511]: warning: connect to proxy service 127.0.0.1:10025: Connection timed out Sep 20 04:29:43 vegaserve postfix/cleanup[24825]: 8F8991E87556C: message-id=<[email protected] Sep 20 04:29:43 vegaserve postfix/qmgr[14378]: 8F8991E87556C: from=, size=946, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Sep 20 04:29:43 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[17511]: disconnect from blu0-omc4-s22.blu0.hotmail.com[65.55.111.161] Sep 20 04:29:43 vegaserve postfix/smtp[25748]: 8F8991E87556C: to=, orig_to=, relay=none, delay=0.05, delays=0.02/0/0.02/0, dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail for vegaserve.com loops back to myself) Sep 20 04:29:43 vegaserve postfix/bounce[25995]: warning: 8F8991E87556C: undeliverable postmaster notification discarded Sep 20 04:29:43 vegaserve postfix/qmgr[14378]: 8F8991E87556C: removed Sep 20 04:29:44 vegaserve postfix/cleanup[24879]: 088641E87556C: message-id=<[email protected] Sep 20 04:29:44 vegaserve postfix/qmgr[14378]: 088641E87556C: from=, size=1078, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Sep 20 04:29:44 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[19328]: disconnect from smtp10.bis7.eu.blackberry.com[178.239.85.15] Sep 20 04:29:44 vegaserve postfix/smtp[25748]: 088641E87556C: to=, orig_to=, relay=none, delay=0.05, delays=0.03/0/0.01/0, dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail for vegaserve.com loops back to myself) Sep 20 04:29:44 vegaserve postfix/bounce[25995]: warning: 088641E87556C: undeliverable postmaster notification discarded Sep 20 04:29:44 vegaserve postfix/qmgr[14378]: 088641E87556C: removed Sep 20 04:29:44 vegaserve pop3d: IMAP connect from @ [201.80.253.153]checkmailpasswd: FAILED: rin - short names not allowed from @ [201.80.253.153]ERR: LOGIN FAILED, ip=[201.80.253.153] Sep 20 04:29:44 vegaserve pop3d: Connection, ip=[201.80.253.153] Sep 20 04:29:44 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[18965]: warning: connect to proxy service 127.0.0.1:10025: Connection timed out Sep 20 04:29:44 vegaserve postfix/cleanup[24825]: 946F51E87556C: message-id=<[email protected] Sep 20 04:29:44 vegaserve postfix/qmgr[14378]: 946F51E87556C: from=, size=1173, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Sep 20 04:29:44 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[18965]: disconnect from hubrelay-rd.bt.com[62.239.224.99] Sep 20 04:29:44 vegaserve postfix/smtp[25748]: 946F51E87556C: to=, orig_to=, relay=none, delay=0.04, delays=0.04/0/0/0, dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail for vegaserve.com loops back to myself) Sep 20 04:29:44 vegaserve postfix/bounce[25897]: warning: 946F51E87556C: undeliverable postmaster notification discarded Sep 20 04:29:44 vegaserve postfix/qmgr[14378]: 946F51E87556C: removed Sep 20 04:29:45 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[14816]: connect from col0-omc2-s12.col0.hotmail.com[65.55.34.86] Sep 20 04:29:47 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[16900]: warning: connect to proxy service 127.0.0.1:10025: Connection timed out Sep 20 04:29:47 vegaserve postfix/cleanup[24879]: 961721E87556C: message-id=<[email protected] Sep 20 04:29:47 vegaserve postfix/qmgr[14378]: 961721E87556C: from=, size=1082, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Sep 20 04:29:47 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[16900]: disconnect from mta-35d2.livingsocial.com[199.91.53.210] Sep 20 04:29:47 vegaserve postfix/smtp[25748]: 961721E87556C: to=, orig_to=, relay=none, delay=0.04, delays=0.04/0/0/0, dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail for vegaserve.com loops back to myself) Sep 20 04:29:47 vegaserve postfix/bounce[25995]: warning: 961721E87556C: undeliverable postmaster notification discarded Sep 20 04:29:47 vegaserve postfix/qmgr[14378]: 961721E87556C: removed Sep 20 04:29:50 vegaserve pop3d: IMAP connect from @ [201.80.253.153]checkmailpasswd: FAILED: rini - short names not allowed from @ [201.80.253.153]ERR: LOGIN FAILED, ip=[201.80.253.153] Sep 20 04:29:50 vegaserve pop3d: Connection, ip=[201.80.253.153] Sep 20 04:29:52 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[24478]: connect from col0-omc2-s13.col0.hotmail.com[65.55.34.87] Sep 20 04:29:52 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[18923]: connect from www.idbwplan.com[193.181.254.21] Sep 20 04:29:55 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[15968]: connect from 105-48.mta.dotmailer.com[94.143.105.48] Sep 20 04:29:56 vegaserve pop3d: IMAP connect from @ [201.80.253.153]checkmailpasswd: FAILED: ringo - short names not allowed from @ [201.80.253.153]ERR: LOGIN FAILED, ip=[201.80.253.153] Sep 20 04:29:56 vegaserve pop3d: Connection, ip=[201.80.253.153] Sep 20 04:30:00 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[18772]: warning: connect to proxy service 127.0.0.1:10025: Connection timed out Sep 20 04:30:01 vegaserve postfix/cleanup[24825]: 1DAD71E87556C: message-id=<[email protected] Sep 20 04:30:01 vegaserve postfix/qmgr[14378]: 1DAD71E87556C: from=, size=1022, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Sep 20 04:30:01 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[18772]: disconnect from mail95.us2.mcsv.net[173.231.139.95] Sep 20 04:30:01 vegaserve postfix/smtp[25748]: 1DAD71E87556C: to=, orig_to=, relay=none, delay=0.06, delays=0.05/0/0/0, dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail for vegaserve.com loops back to myself) Sep 20 04:30:01 vegaserve postfix/bounce[25897]: warning: 1DAD71E87556C: undeliverable postmaster notification discarded Sep 20 04:30:01 vegaserve postfix/qmgr[14378]: 1DAD71E87556C: removed Sep 20 04:30:02 vegaserve pop3d: IMAP connect from @ [201.80.253.153]checkmailpasswd: FAILED: ritsuko - short names not allowed from @ [201.80.253.153]ERR: LOGIN FAILED, ip=[201.80.253.153] Sep 20 04:30:02 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[16911]: warning: connect to proxy service 127.0.0.1:10025: Connection timed out Sep 20 04:30:02 vegaserve pop3d: Connection, ip=[201.80.253.153] Sep 20 04:30:02 vegaserve postfix/cleanup[24879]: 8AADD1E87556C: message-id=<[email protected] Sep 20 04:30:02 vegaserve postfix/qmgr[14378]: 8AADD1E87556C: from=, size=1003, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Sep 20 04:30:02 vegaserve postfix/smtpd[16911]: disconnect from mr133.createsend.com[184.106.86.133] Sep 20 04:30:02 vegaserve postfix/smtp[25748]: 8AADD1E87556C: to=, orig_to=, relay=none, delay=0.02, delays=0.02/0/0/0, dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail for vegaserve.com loops back to myself)

    Read the article

  • How much money can I save from installing a 80 plus bronze or gold PSU? [closed]

    - by David
    Currently I've only a 300 watt PSU and my pc is working like a charm but with all the components it should use the psu to the max. Recently I've read about 80 plus certificate and I'm wondering if it's worth to buy a 80 plus certificate psu? My power cost last year was also higher then before and my pc turns almost 14/7 a day. I mean power cost in used power not in augmented prices. I'm also planing to buy a SLI video card.

    Read the article

  • Not able to connect to port 80 using telnet?

    - by pranitkothari
    When I try to connect my Windows PC with telnet, its giving me following error. Welcome to Microsoft Telnet Client Escape Character is 'CTRL+]' Microsoft Telnet open 192.168.220.135 80 Connecting To 192.168.220.135...Could not open connection to the host, on port 8 0: Connect failed Microsoft Telnet I have firewall off for both the machines. Can you please suggest how to connect to port 80 using telnet. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Does the 80/20 rule of time management apply to developers?

    - by Dean
    Jeff's recent article linked to a time management example of the First Fit Decreasing algorithm, which talked about the Pareto principle (or, the 80/20 rule) of time management, that is, that 80% of the work we produce in 20% of our time. Now we've all heard the programmer quote: The first 90% of the code accounts for the first 90% of the development time. The remaining 10% of the code accounts for the other 90% of the development time. But all jokes aside, it is often as if 20% of your code is to do what you want, and the other 80% is to handle exceptions... so does the 80/20 rule really apply to developers? Does anyone have any examples of why it does / does not apply to us?

    Read the article

  • IIS6 Log time recording problems

    - by Hafthor
    On three separate occasions on two separate servers at nearly the same times, 6.9 hours seemingly went by without any data being written to the IIS logs, but, on closer inspection, it appears that it was all recorded all at once. Here's the facts as I know them: Windows Server 2003 R2 w/ IIS6 Logging using GMT, server local time GMT-7. Application was still operating and I have SQL data to prove that Time gaps appear in log file, not across two # headers appear at gap Load balancer pings every 30 seconds No caching Here's info on a particular case: an entry appears for 2009-09-21 18:09:27 then #headers the next entry is for 2009-09-22 01:21:54, and so are the next 1600 entries in this log file and 370 in the next log file. about half of the ~2000 entries on 2009-09-22 01:21:54 are load balancer pings (est. at 2/min for 6.9hrs = 828 pings) then entries are recorded as normal. I believe that these events may coincide with me deploying an ASP.NET application update into those machines. Here's some relevant content from the logs in question: ex090921.log line 3684 2009-09-21 17:54:40 GET /ping.aspx - 80 404 0 0 3733 122 0 2009-09-21 17:55:11 GET /ping.aspx - 80 404 0 0 3733 122 0 2009-09-21 17:55:42 GET /ping.aspx - 80 404 0 0 3733 122 0 2009-09-21 17:56:13 GET /ping.aspx - 80 404 0 0 3733 122 0 2009-09-21 17:56:45 GET /ping.aspx - 80 404 0 0 3733 122 0 #Software: Microsoft Internet Information Services 6.0 #Version: 1.0 #Date: 2009-09-21 18:04:37 #Fields: date time cs-method cs-uri-stem cs-uri-query s-port sc-status sc-substatus sc-win32-status sc-bytes cs-bytes time-taken 2009-09-22 01:04:06 GET /ping.aspx - 80 404 0 0 3733 122 3078 2009-09-22 01:04:06 GET /ping.aspx - 80 404 0 0 3733 122 109 2009-09-22 01:04:06 GET /ping.aspx - 80 200 0 0 278 122 3828 2009-09-22 01:04:06 GET /ping.aspx - 80 200 0 0 278 122 0 2009-09-22 01:04:06 GET /ping.aspx - 80 200 0 0 278 122 0 ... continues until line 5449 2009-09-22 01:04:06 GET /ping.aspx - 80 200 0 0 277 122 0 <eof> ex090922.log #Software: Microsoft Internet Information Services 6.0 #Version: 1.0 #Date: 2009-09-22 00:00:16 #Fields: date time cs-method cs-uri-stem cs-uri-query s-port sc-status sc-substatus sc-win32-status sc-bytes cs-bytes time-taken 2009-09-22 01:04:06 GET /ping.aspx - 80 200 0 0 277 122 0 2009-09-22 01:04:06 GET /ping.aspx - 80 200 0 0 277 122 0 ... continues until line 367 2009-09-22 01:04:06 GET /ping.aspx - 80 200 0 0 277 122 0 2009-09-22 01:04:30 GET /ping.aspx - 80 200 0 0 277 122 0 ... back to normal behavior Note the seemingly correct date/time written to the #header of the new log file. Also note that /ping.aspx returned 404 then switched to 200 just as the problem started. I rename the "I'm alive page" so the load balancer stops sending requests to the server while I'm working on it. What you see here is me renaming it back so the load balancer will use the server. So, this problem definitely coincides with me re-enabling the server. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Not Provide count has reached 80%! But what about remaining 20?

    - by Rajesh Magar
    I am updated with all not-provided reasons as Google has encrypted their all searches, but here is the little question banging again and again in my head. That if all search results has encrypted with HTTPS protocol then how did Google analytics still able to track some of (20%) organic keywords details? I means their still some keywords appreading in my organic keywords section. So how did Google analytics track or bypass that HTTPS thing? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • La FAQ Perl/Tk, 80 réponses à vos questions dont 13 mises à jour, avec un moteur de recherche intégré

    Salut,Comme on peut le constater, Perl manque malheureusement de cours sur le net en rapport avec la création d'interfaces graphique via Tk. Il existe néanmoins quelques cours sur developpez.com dans la partie coursNoter qu'il est vraiment possible de créer très facilement de très bonnes interfaces graphiques en Perl, et je souhaite d'ailleurs créer une FAQ pour l'occasion, mais je voudrais d'abord connaitre l'avis des Perlistes du forum.Maintenant que la FAQ Perl/Tk est présente, n'hésitez pas à faire des suggestions de questions que vous souhaitez voir pouvant aider les perléens.Vous pouvez tous participer à son évolution.Merci...

    Read the article

  • IIS6 Log time recording problems

    - by Hafthor
    On three separate occasions on two separate servers at nearly the same times, 6.9 hours seemingly went by without any data being written to the IIS logs, but, on closer inspection, it appears that it was all recorded all at once. Here's the facts as I know them: Windows Server 2003 R2 w/ IIS6 Logging using GMT, server local time GMT-7. Application was still operating and I have SQL data to prove that Time gaps appear in log file, not across two # headers appear at gap Load balancer pings every 30 seconds No caching Here's info on a particular case: an entry appears for 2009-09-21 18:09:27 then #headers the next entry is for 2009-09-22 01:21:54, and so are the next 1600 entries in this log file and 370 in the next log file. about half of the ~2000 entries on 2009-09-22 01:21:54 are load balancer pings (est. at 2/min for 6.9hrs = 828 pings) then entries are recorded as normal. I believe that these events may coincide with me deploying an ASP.NET application update into those machines. Here's some relevant content from the logs in question: ex090921.log line 3684 2009-09-21 17:54:40 GET /ping.aspx - 80 404 0 0 3733 122 0 2009-09-21 17:55:11 GET /ping.aspx - 80 404 0 0 3733 122 0 2009-09-21 17:55:42 GET /ping.aspx - 80 404 0 0 3733 122 0 2009-09-21 17:56:13 GET /ping.aspx - 80 404 0 0 3733 122 0 2009-09-21 17:56:45 GET /ping.aspx - 80 404 0 0 3733 122 0 #Software: Microsoft Internet Information Services 6.0 #Version: 1.0 #Date: 2009-09-21 18:04:37 #Fields: date time cs-method cs-uri-stem cs-uri-query s-port sc-status sc-substatus sc-win32-status sc-bytes cs-bytes time-taken 2009-09-22 01:04:06 GET /ping.aspx - 80 404 0 0 3733 122 3078 2009-09-22 01:04:06 GET /ping.aspx - 80 404 0 0 3733 122 109 2009-09-22 01:04:06 GET /ping.aspx - 80 200 0 0 278 122 3828 2009-09-22 01:04:06 GET /ping.aspx - 80 200 0 0 278 122 0 2009-09-22 01:04:06 GET /ping.aspx - 80 200 0 0 278 122 0 ... continues until line 5449 2009-09-22 01:04:06 GET /ping.aspx - 80 200 0 0 277 122 0 <eof> ex090922.log #Software: Microsoft Internet Information Services 6.0 #Version: 1.0 #Date: 2009-09-22 00:00:16 #Fields: date time cs-method cs-uri-stem cs-uri-query s-port sc-status sc-substatus sc-win32-status sc-bytes cs-bytes time-taken 2009-09-22 01:04:06 GET /ping.aspx - 80 200 0 0 277 122 0 2009-09-22 01:04:06 GET /ping.aspx - 80 200 0 0 277 122 0 ... continues until line 367 2009-09-22 01:04:06 GET /ping.aspx - 80 200 0 0 277 122 0 2009-09-22 01:04:30 GET /ping.aspx - 80 200 0 0 277 122 0 ... back to normal behavior Note the seemingly correct date/time written to the #header of the new log file. Also note that /ping.aspx returned 404 then switched to 200 just as the problem started. I rename the "I'm alive page" so the load balancer stops sending requests to the server while I'm working on it. What you see here is me renaming it back so the load balancer will use the server. So, this problem definitely coincides with me re-enabling the server. Any ideas?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14  | Next Page >