Search Results

Search found 12670 results on 507 pages for 'ie tweaker plus'.

Page 75/507 | < Previous Page | 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82  | Next Page >

  • How do you update table row background color in IE using Javascript/CSS ?

    - by giulio
    I have a table that i want to "highlight" during onmouseover/onmouseout. I already know this is required in IE but not in other browsers. I have managed to detect the events triggering and this TR tag effectively works. (Note that the originating class "contentTableRow" doesn't seem to be causing any issues.) class="contentTableRow" onclick="openForm('SomeID');" onmouseover="highlight('someRowID', true);" onmouseout="highlight('someRowID', false);" id="someRowID" All is fine and dandy, the "highlight" function fires and actually sets the appropriate class. It's just that IE won't process the CSS class name change. Here is a snippet of the CSS I am using to make the change. .HighlightOn { cursor:pointer; background-color: #D1DFFF; } .HighlightOff { background-color: #E1EEFE; } I can see that the Class names are getting updated when I debug it, and also check it in Firebug. But it seems that IE doesn't like this usage of classes with a TR tag.. Is it the way I am structuring the class for Tables ? Any advice ?

    Read the article

  • passing callback function accross windows causing error with ie ...

    - by krul
    I have a problem with IE causing two errors: 1. Object doesn't support this property or method 2. Call was rejected by callee. My Intention: To call window.opener.myObject method that is going to retrieve some data using ajax and pass in callback function that live as nested function in popup window that initiated call that is going to handle response data and modify popup window html accordingly. Here is a scenario: I pull up popup window that handles some specific operation. This popup window calling window.opener.myObject method that using ajax call. I'm passing in popup window function that is going to handle response and it works with ff and safari but not with ie. Here is code sample //RELEVANT SCRIPT ON POPUP WINDOW $('#myButton').live('click', function() { var h = window.opener.myObject, p = { 'p1': 1 }; var responseHandler = function(responseObj) { //in IE we never got here if (!responseObj) { alert('Unexpected error!! No response from server'); return false; } //..handle response }; p.p1 = $('#control').val(); h.executeMethod(p, responseHandler); }); //RELEVANT SCRIPT ON WINDOW OPENER MYOBJECT try { $.ajax({ type: 'POST', async: true, url: url, data: postData, dataType: "json", contentType: 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset=utf-8', success: r, // r here is reference to my responseHandler popup window function error: handleError }); } catch (ex) { alert(ex.message); } Any tips?

    Read the article

  • Why is there a time lag when trying to change the text on a button in IE using JQuery?

    - by Deane
    I have some Ajax that runs on a button click. Sometimes it takes a few seconds to return, so I wanted a visual clue to the user that the browser was doing something. So, I have this: $('#SubmitButton').attr("value", "Working..."); $('#SubmitButton').attr("disabled", true); //Synchronous Ajax call goes here $('#SubmitButton').attr("value", "Submit"); $('#SubmitButton').attr("disabled", false); As you can see, it changes the text on the button, and disables it. When the Ajax call comes back (it's synchronous, remember), the button changes back. In Firefox, this works great. In IE, it's...odd. It doesn't run the code in order. It doesn't change the text of the button and launches right into the Ajax call. The browser blocks with the Submit active and saying "Submit." Right after the Ajax comes back, the button quickly flashes "Working..." then back to Submit." So, for some reason, IE isn't changing the text of the button until after the Ajax call, even though the code for it is before the Ajax call. It's acting like this: //Synchronous Ajax call goes here $('#SubmitButton').attr("value", "Working..."); $('#SubmitButton').attr("disabled", true); $('#SubmitButton').attr("value", "Submit"); $('#SubmitButton').attr("disabled", false); Again, this works perfectly in Firefox. But in IE, there's some kind of...lag?

    Read the article

  • Why would the IE Developer Toolbar claim a style is applied, yet that supposed fact is not reflected

    - by Deane
    I have a situation where IE7 is simply not applying styles, even though it claims it is. I have an element on my page. In the CSS, I have defined a rule that should apply "display: none" to it, so it should not be displayed. It's still displaying. I downloaded the IE Developer Toolbar, and found the element in the DOM selector. I right-clicked and selected "Applied Styles." Right there, IE claims that it is applying my "display: none" rule. In fact, the "Applied Styles" dialog confirms everything I think I know about my CSS and how it should be applied. Yet the element remains. Now, I'm not asking anyone to debug my CSS here. I'm asking, if the IE Developer Toolbar claims/confirms this element should be gone, but it's still there...what does that mean, exactly? Since the Toolbar is on my side, I think my CSS is fine. Is there some IE7 bug I'm not considering? Edit: One thing that might be relevant: the LINK elements that load the stylesheets are applied to the page in Javascript, via "document.write". I'm starting to suspect that has something to do with it.

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET GridView "Client-Side Confirmation when Deleting" stopped working on ie - how come?

    - by tarnold
    A few months ago, I have programmed an ASP.NET GridView with a custom "Delete" LinkButton and Client-Side JavaScript Confirmation according to this msdn article: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb428868.aspx (published in April 2007) or e.g. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/218733/javascript-before-aspbuttonfield-click The code looks like this: <ItemTemplate> <asp:LinkButton ID="deleteLinkButton" runat="server" Text="Delete" OnCommand="deleteLinkButtonButton_Command" CommandName='<%# Eval("id") %>' OnClientClick='<%# Eval("id", "return confirm(\"Delete Id {0}?\")") %>' /> </ItemTemplate> Surprisingly, "Cancel" doesn't work no more with my ie (Version: 6.0.2900.2180.xpsp_sp2_qfe.080814-1242) - it always deletes the row. With Opera (Version 9.62) it still works as expeced and described in the msdn article. More surprisingly, on a fellow worker's machine with the same ie version, it still works ("Cancel" will not delete the row). The generated code looks like <a onclick="return confirm(...);" href="javascript:__doPostBack('...')"> As confirm(...) returns false on "Cancel", I expect the __doPostBack event in the href not to be fired. Are there any strange ie settings I accidentally might have changed? What else could be the cause of this weird behaviour? Or is this a "please reinstall WinXP" issue?

    Read the article

  • Major JQuery bug on IE not reproducible - What can i do in this situation to solve this bug?

    - by ming yeow
    I am hoping to get some help on this issue. Some users on IE have been reporting this javascript issue, but I have been unable to re-produce it. In essence, for some class of windows IE users, the game doesn't work (or $.ajax() is not working). What I know: I swapped out an ajax call (ajax_init_trainer) and used a standard link with some request parameters to do the initialization and ppl seemed to get passed the problem until they hit the next ajax call. I read somewhere that IE does crazy caching so you need to make the urls unique, which is why i added the _requestno parameter. However, setting the cache:false is said to also do this. This didn't fix it for someone who was complaining. function done(res, status) { var data = JSON.parse(res.responseText); hide_loading(); if (status == "success") { window.location.href="/bamo/battle/?{{ fb_sig}}"; } else { display_alert("Problem!",data.msg,$("#notifications")); } }; $(".monster_select_class").click(function() { $(this).attr("src","{{MEDIA_URL}}/bamo/button_select_click.png"); monster_class = $(this).attr("monster_class"); monster_type = $(this).attr("monster_type"); ajax_init_trainer(monster_class,monster_type); }); function ajax_init_trainer(trainer_class,monster_type) { var data = {trainer_class:trainer_class,monster_type:monster_type}; var d = new Date(); var args = { type:"POST",url:"/bamo/api/init_trainer/?_requestno="+d.getTime(),data:data,contentType:"application/json;", dataType: "json",cache:false,complete:done}; $.ajax(args); return false; };

    Read the article

  • Does IE completely ignore cache control headers for AJAX requests?

    - by Joshua Hayworth
    Hello there, I've got, what I would consider, a simple test web site. A single page with a single button. Here is a copy of the source I'm working with if you would like to download it and play with it. When that button is clicked, it creates a JavaScript timer that executes once a second. When the timer function is executed, An AJAX call is made to retrieve a text value. That text value is then placed into the DOM. What's my problem? IE Caching. Crack open Task Manager and watch what happens to the iexplorer.exe process (IE 8.0.7600.16385 for me) while the timer in that page is executing. See the memory and handle count getting larger? Why is that happening when, by all accounts, I have caching turned off. I've got the jQuery cache option set to false in $.ajaxSetup. I've got the CacheControl header set to no-cache and no-store. The Expires header is set to DateTime.Now.AddDays(-1). The headers are set in both the page code-behind as well as the HTTP Handler's response. Anybody got any ideas as to how I could prevent IE from caching the results of the AJAX call? Here is what the iexplorer.exe process looks like in ProcessMonitor. I believe that the activity shown in this picture is exactly what I'm attempting to prevent.

    Read the article

  • Why does a checkbox remain checked in FF3 but not in IE, Chrome or ...

    - by sirrocco
    So - I have a checkbox <asp:CheckBox ID="chkOrder" runat="server" Visible='<%#IsCheckBoxVisible() %>' Checked="false" OnCheckedChanged="chkOrder_CheckedChanged" AutoPostBack="true" EnableViewState="false"></asp:CheckBox> the one above. Now, the checkbox is in a gridview and on databound - for all the rows in the gridview the checkbox is set to false. The problem is that the first checkbox is still true checked. In IE the problem doesn't exist, same for Chrome. I'm running out of options. Also if i use $("checkboxName").attr("checked"); // verified on jquery ready function. In FF it is true; IE false; Chrome false. Any tips? EDIT Now get ready for this : in the generated html - there is NO checked attribute. The diff between FF and IE is exactly the same. Another thing - the grid that contains the checkboxes has an ajax panel on it and when I page the grid, try to go to page 2 - the checkedChanged in codebehind is triggered.

    Read the article

  • JavaScript library not working in IE, can't see error information.

    - by Wolfy87
    Hi there. I have been writing a JavaScript library for a few weeks now and it works brilliantly in Firefox, Chrome and Safari. I had not tested it in IE until recently. I do not own a Windows box so after testing it on my friends and realising it wasnt working I started going over my code for things that could be causing it to break. So far I have found nothing. I could not find any descriptions of the errors in the browser while I was there either. So I wondered if anyone could run my test script in an IE browser (6, 7 or 8) and let me know any information they can find as to why it crashed. Please ignore any information saying it works in IE6, I put that up there after testing it through http://ipinfo.info/netrenderer/ I just assumed it was working because I could set transparency and size via my script and see it run in this tool. Here is the link to my GitHub repository: https://github.com/Wolfy87/Spark If you download it and run spark.html it will attempt to run all of my functions from the library. So if anyone could be kind enough to run it in IE and either let me know what errors they are getting and possibly how to fix them then I will be extreamly grateful. Thank you in advance. EDIT: Here is it's website http://sparkjs.co.uk/

    Read the article

  • Making IE "forget" information entered in form when using back button.

    - by typoknig
    I have a page with a form where many of the fields are populated from variables passed in the URL. Those fields are disabled (NON-EDITABLE) and are only there for the user to view. The remaining fields require user input and are NOT disabled (EDITABLE). When the form is submitted a confirmation page comes up. It may be the case that the user needs to submit several of these forms where the NON-EDITABLE information is identical from form to form, so being able to go back to the form page from the confirmation page would save a lot of time. The way I want this to work is when a user presses the back button all the NON-EDITABLE fields are populated, but the EDITABLE fields are blank. This is what Firefox is doing, but IE8 is does not "forget" what has been entered in the EDITABLE fields. To disable the cache the following appears at the beginning of my page AND at the end of my page. <head> <meta http-equiv="Pragma" content="no-cache"/> <meta http-equiv="Cache-Control" content="no-store"/> <head/> What more must I do to make IE forget what was entered in the EDITABLE fields when the back button is pressed? All of my pages are generated with PHP if that matters. EDIT: It appears to me that this is a problem of IE caching my page even though I have told it not to. Are my meta tags correct? Do I need to do something else to prevent IE from caching my page?

    Read the article

  • 1 Français sur 4 surfera via son smartphone en 2014, l'Internet mobile est-il l'avenir de l'informat

    1 Français sur 4 surfera via son smartphone en 2014, l'Internet mobile est-il l'avenir de l'informatique ? Avec sa manie de franciser tous les termes informatiques, le ministère de la Culture s'est penché sur le citoyen surfant sur son portable, et l'a baptisé le "mobinaute". Il faut savoir que cette espèce devrait être de plus en plus répandue à l'avenir. En effet, de plus en plus de téléphones mobiles permettent de surfer sur Internet (activité qui était avant réservée aux smartphones). D'après une enquête mondiale sur l'industrie des loisirs et des médias publiée mardi par PricewaterhouseCoopers (cabinet d'audit) ; plus d'un français sur quatre (soit 18 millions de personnes) pourra se connecter au Net ...

    Read the article

  • iPhone 5 : adaptateurs, nano-SIM, 3G+ en France et une action Apple prévue à 1.000 $

    L'iPhone 5 a un écran plus grand et une nouvelle connectique propriétaire Il arrive le 21 septembre, aux mêmes prix que l'iPhone 4S Edit de 23h30 : ajout des caractéristiques techniques complètes, de la partie sur la Nano-SIM et des prix officiels Cinq. Apple a bien présenté ce soir son iPhone 5, avec un écran de 4 pouces (1136 x 640 en 16/9e). Comme prévu. Que les développeurs se rassurent, les applications conçues pour les anciens iPhones ne seront pas étirées mais se verront ajouter deux bandes noires. Plus fin (7.6 mm), plus léger (112 grammes), plus rapide avec le processeur A6 (présenté comme 2 fois plus véloce, y compris dan...

    Read the article

  • La Libye coupe ses accès Internet, certains craignent l'indisponibilité des URL réduites de bit.ly

    La Libye coupe ses accès Internet, certains craignent l'indisponibilité des URL réduites de bit.ly On ne rigole plus en Libye. Le pays, soulevé depuis quelques jours par les opposants au régime politique en place, est de plus en plus agité. Face à cela, le pouvoir libyen craint de voir arriver la même issue qu'en Egypte. Aussi, depuis vendredi, le réseau social Facebook n'est plus accessible dans le pays. Mais ce n'est pas tout. Muammar Kadhafi a également demandé une coupure de l'Internet local, et le dirigeant ne s'adresse plus aux médias. Puis, la Toile a été accessible par intermittences : quelques fois, les sites sont lents, d'autres fois, ils sont inaccessibles. Apparemment, une embellie aurait...

    Read the article

  • AMD sort un processeur 12 coeurs, devance-t-il Intel à tous les niveaux ?

    AMD sort un processeur 12 coeurs, devance-t-il Intel à tous les niveaux ? Depuis quelques années, les processeurs les plus répandus sont ceux comprenant deux ou quatre coeurs. D'autres existent, dotés notamment de six coeurs (ou plus), mais ils sont assez chers et plutôt destinés à des usages professionnels dans des serveurs ayant un grand nombre de charges de travail à traiter en parallèle. Plus il y a de coeurs, plus il y a de rapidité, si tant est que les programmes en face puissent tirer tout l'avantage de cette puissance. Généralement, les serveurs utilisant ce type de puces les lient ensemble en un gros cluster. AMD amène donc sur le marché un processeur encore plus puissant, doté de 12 coeurs.

    Read the article

  • Ouverture du forum d'entraide pour les auto-entrepreneurs, un régime sur lequel pèsent de nombreuses incertitudes

    Ouverture du forum d'entraide pour les auto-entrepreneurs Un régime pour les freelances sur lequel pèsent de nombreuses menaces Un nouveau forum d'entraide vient d'ouvrir sur Developpez.com : celui pour les auto-entrepreneurs. Ce régime, décliné du statut des micro-entreprises, est de plus en plus utilisé par les développeurs freelances. Sa simplicité (pas de comptabilité, pas de TVA, etc.) et son mode d'imposition (les charges ne sont à acquitter qu'en cas de chiffre d'affaires réel) expliquent cette popularité grandissante auprès d'indépendants qui l'utilisent non plus pour des activités complémentaires mais de plus en plus pour leur principale. Cette forme d'entreprise...

    Read the article

  • IDC : la virtualisation atteindra 19,3 milliards de dollars en 2014 et fera tourner 70% des applications serveurs

    IDC : le marché des serveurs virtualisés atteindra 19,3 milliards de dollars en 2014 Et 70% des charges de travail seront effectuées sur une machine virtuelle Le cabinet d'analyse IDC vient de livrer les résultats d'une étude sur la virtualisation au sein des serveurs d'ici 2014. Premier fait intéressant plus de 70 % de toutes les charges de travail des serveurs installés le seront effectués sur une machine virtuelle en 2014. Le cabinet d'analyse s'attend en effet à ce que la croissance de la virtualisation soit de plus en plus élevée compte tenu de l'adoption devenue de plus en plus ordinaire de cette technologie par les centres de données et les entreprises, un mo...

    Read the article

  • arch openldap authentication failure

    - by nonus25
    I setup the openldap, all look fine but i cant setup authentication, #getent shadow | grep user user:*::::::: tuser:*::::::: tuser2:*::::::: #getent passwd | grep user git:!:999:999:git daemon user:/:/bin/bash user:x:10000:2000:Test User:/home/user/:/bin/zsh tuser:x:10000:2000:Test User:/home/user/:/bin/zsh tuser2:x:10002:2000:Test User:/home/tuser2/:/bin/zsh from root i can login as a one of these users #su - tuser2 su: warning: cannot change directory to /home/tuser2/: No such file or directory 10:24 tuser2@juliet:/root i cant login via ssh also passwd is not working #ldapwhoami -h 10.121.3.10 -D "uid=user,ou=People,dc=xcl,dc=ie" ldap_bind: Server is unwilling to perform (53) additional info: unauthenticated bind (DN with no password) disallowed 10:30 root@juliet:~ #ldapwhoami -h 10.121.3.10 -D "uid=user,ou=People,dc=xcl,dc=ie" -W Enter LDAP Password: ldap_bind: Invalid credentials (49) typed password by me is correct /etc/openldap/slapd.conf access to dn.base="" by * read access to dn.base="cn=Subschema" by * read access to * by self write by users read by anonymous read access to * by dn="uid=root,ou=Roles,dc=xcl,dc=ie" write by users read by anonymous auth access to attrs=userPassword,gecos,description,loginShell by self write access to attrs="userPassword" by dn="uid=root,ou=Roles,dc=xcl,dc=ie" write by anonymous auth by self write by * none access to * by dn="uid=root,ou=Roles,dc=xcl,dc=ie" write by dn="uid=achmiel,ou=People,dc=xcl,dc=ie" write by * search access to attrs=userPassword by self =w by anonymous auth access to * by self write by users read database hdb suffix "dc=xcl,dc=ie" rootdn "cn=root,dc=xcl,dc=ie" rootpw "{SSHA}AM14+..." there are some parts of that conf file /etc/openldap/ldap.conf looks : BASE dc=xcl,dc=ie URI ldap://192.168.10.156/ TLS_REQCERT allow TIMELIMIT 2 so my question is what i am missing that ldap not allow me login by using password ?

    Read the article

  • jquery dynamic form plugin: adding nested field support

    - by goliatone
    Hi, Im using the jQuery dynamic form plugin, but i need support for nested field duplication. I would like some advice on how to modify the plugin to add such functionality. Im not a javascript/jQuery developer, so any advice on which route to take will be much appreciated. I can provide the plugin's code: /** * @author Stephane Roucheray * @extends jQuery */ jQuery.fn.dynamicForm = function (plusElmnt, minusElmnt, options){ var source = jQuery(this), minus = jQuery(minusElmnt), plus = jQuery(plusElmnt), template = source.clone(true), fieldId = 0, formFields = "input, checkbox, select, textarea", insertBefore = source.next(), clones = [], defaults = { duration:1000 }; // Extend default options with those provided options = $.extend(defaults, options); isPlusDescendentOfTemplate = source.find("*").filter(function(){ return this == plus.get(0); }); isPlusDescendentOfTemplate = isPlusDescendentOfTemplate.length > 0 ? true : false; function normalizeElmnt(elmnt){ elmnt.find(formFields).each(function(){ var nameAttr = jQuery(this).attr("name"), idAttr = jQuery(this).attr("id"); /* Normalize field name attributes */ if (!nameAttr) { jQuery(this).attr("name", "field" + fieldId + "[]"); } if (!/\[\]$/.exec(nameAttr)) { jQuery(this).attr("name", nameAttr + "[]"); } /* Normalize field id attributes */ if (idAttr) { /* Normalize attached label */ jQuery("label[for='"+idAttr+"']").each(function(){ jQuery(this).attr("for", idAttr + fieldId); }); jQuery(this).attr("id", idAttr + fieldId); } fieldId++; }); }; /* Hide minus element */ minus.hide(); /* If plus element is within the template */ if (isPlusDescendentOfTemplate) { function clickOnPlus(event){ var clone, currentClone = clones[clones.length -1] || source; event.preventDefault(); /* On first add, normalize source */ if (clones.length == 0) { normalizeElmnt(source); currentClone.find(minusElmnt).hide(); currentClone.find(plusElmnt).hide(); }else{ currentClone.find(plusElmnt).hide(); } /* Clone template and normalize it */ clone = template.clone(true).insertAfter(clones[clones.length - 1] || source); normalizeElmnt(clone); /* Normalize template id attribute */ if (clone.attr("id")) { clone.attr("id", clone.attr("id") + clones.length); } plus = clone.find(plusElmnt); minus = clone.find(minusElmnt); minus.get(0).removableClone = clone; minus.click(clickOnMinus); plus.click(clickOnPlus); if (options.limit && (options.limit - 2) > clones.length) { plus.show(); }else{ plus.hide(); } clones.push(clone); } function clickOnMinus(event){ event.preventDefault(); if (this.removableClone.effect && options.removeColor) { that = this; this.removableClone.effect("highlight", { color: options.removeColor }, options.duration, function(){that.removableClone.remove();}); } else { this.removableClone.remove(); } clones.splice(clones.indexOf(this.removableClone),1); if (clones.length == 0){ source.find(plusElmnt).show(); }else{ clones[clones.length -1].find(plusElmnt).show(); } } /* Handle click on plus */ plus.click(clickOnPlus); /* Handle click on minus */ minus.click(function(event){ }); }else{ /* If plus element is out of the template */ /* Handle click on plus */ plus.click(function(event){ var clone; event.preventDefault(); /* On first add, normalize source */ if (clones.length == 0) { normalizeElmnt(source); jQuery(minusElmnt).show(); } /* Clone template and normalize it */ clone = template.clone(true).insertAfter(clones[clones.length - 1] || source); if (clone.effect && options.createColor) { clone.effect("highlight", {color:options.createColor}, options.duration); } normalizeElmnt(clone); /* Normalize template id attribute */ if (clone.attr("id")) { clone.attr("id", clone.attr("id") + clones.length); } if (options.limit && (options.limit - 3) < clones.length) { plus.hide(); } clones.push(clone); }); /* Handle click on minus */ minus.click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); var clone = clones.pop(); if (clones.length >= 0) { if (clone.effect && options.removeColor) { that = this; clone.effect("highlight", { color: options.removeColor, mode:"hide" }, options.duration, function(){clone.remove();}); } else { clone.remove(); } } if (clones.length == 0) { jQuery(minusElmnt).hide(); } plus.show(); }); } };

    Read the article

  • $('<style></style>').text('css').appendTo('head') does not work in IE?

    - by powerboy
    It works fine in Firefox and Chrome, but does not work in IE8. Here is the html structure: <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.2/jquery.min.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> $(function() { // this does not work in the stupid IE $('<style type="text/css"></style>').text('body {margin: 0;}').appendTo('head'); }); </script> </head> <body> </body> </html> And what' s the alternative to do this in IE?

    Read the article

  • Running IE on OSX with WineBottler: Can't find wine?

    - by AP257
    So I want to run IE7 on OSX 10.6 with WineBottler. I saw it was possible to run IE on Mac with WineBottler, following these instructions. I installed WineBottler and IE7. All was looking good. However, when I tried to open IE7 from the Applications menu, I got an error message: "Can't find Wine. Wine is required to run this program." I then installed wine-devel from macports (which was a bit fiddly as I hit this problem and had to update a lot of dependencies, but it did eventually build). However, even after doing that, I'm still seeing the 'Can't find wine' error message whenever I try to open IE7 or WineBottler. Could anyone advise? Do I need to start wine running somehow?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82  | Next Page >