Search Results

Search found 17202 results on 689 pages for 'folder permissions'.

Page 78/689 | < Previous Page | 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85  | Next Page >

  • Restoring the owners on debian system files

    - by Vlad
    Due to my inattention, tiredness (and probably stupidity) i've run chown -R someuser:someuser / and now all your base are belongs to us the files on the server belong to one user (lol). After system restart apache, bind9, mysql, and a dozen of other applications don't start and fill their log files with permission errors. I haven't done any backups on system files, only on the db and website files... Please suggest some ways to revive my web server. I have only 2 month experience with linux, so please keep it simple...

    Read the article

  • Automate SQL Server 2008 backup script failing to run

    - by Techboy
    I have created a maintenance plan but when I try to execute I get the error: Message [298] SQLServer Error: 15404, Could not obtain information about Windows NT group/user 'XX\Administrator', error code 0x534. [SQLSTATE 42000] (ConnIsLoginSysAdmin) I have given administrator db owner access but still get the error, what am I doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • Mac can write to samba share

    - by David
    I have a samba share that works fine for PCs, but we have a mac user who seems to only be able to edit and rename existing files, he cannot add new files. Any ideas? Here is the share setup: path = /media/freeagent/officeshare read only = No guest ok = Yes writeable = yes public = yes

    Read the article

  • Files listed by bash but unaccessible

    - by Cerin
    What would cause the following behavior on an Ubuntu 12.04 system? I've SSHed into a machine as the "ubuntu" user. Running ls -lah /data/* shows dozens of non-empty files (e.g. file1.txt, file2.txt, etc), all owned by the "ubuntu" user/group, and with full read/write access. If I try to cat /data/file1.txt, bash gives me the error "cat: /data/file1.txt: No such file or directory" In short, ls is listing files, but in every other way, the files essentially don't exist. I can't cat them or read them in any way. Even giving all the files 777 permission doesn't change anything. This is really bizarre. What's going on here?

    Read the article

  • Symlink - Permission Denied

    - by John Smith
    I'm facing an interesting problem with plenty of Permission Denied outputs when using SymLinks Linux: Slackware 13.1 Directory with Symlink: root@Tower:/var/lib# ls -lah drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 0 2012-12-02 20:09 ./ drwxr-xr-x 15 root root 0 2012-12-01 21:06 ../ lrwxrwxrwx 1 ntop ntop 21 2012-12-02 20:09 ntop - /mnt/user/media/ntop6/ Symlinked Directory: root@Tower:/mnt/user/media# ls -lah drwxrwx--- 1 nobody users 1.4K 2012-12-02 19:28 ./ drwxrwx--- 1 nobody users 128 2012-11-18 16:06 ../ drwxrwxrwx 1 ntop ntop 320 2012-12-02 20:22 ntop6/ What I have done: I have used chown -h ntop:ntop on the ntop directory in /var/lib Just to be sure, I have chmod 777 to both directories Permission denied actions: root@Tower:/var/lib# sudo -u ntop mkdir /var/lib/ntop/test mkdir: cannot create directory `/var/lib/ntop/test': Permission denied Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Determining timeout reason

    - by datatoo
    What is the best way to determine what causes a server timeout on a Plesk passworded directory in IIS6? Even if the default page is static text I can get a timeout. This has worked fine for two years and has only seemed to change after adding a new permitted user. Occasionally there is success but usually loading is very slow. Where would I look for a problem, as it doesn't seem to be page content causing the issue?

    Read the article

  • IIS 401.3 - Unauthorized on only 1 server out of 3 set up for network load balancing

    - by Tony
    Over the weekend our Server Admin set up two virtual Windows 2008 machines with IIS installed and set them up under NLB. I came in and changed the application pool the website was running under to our domain account that has proper access to the database and the file share hosting our .NET web application Sitefinity, and changed it to .NET 4 Integrated. NLB and everything was running fine on both servers. He brought up the third server for our cluster on Tuesday and I performed the same actions.. The only difference was that I was given admin rights for the third server so I could set it up remotely instead of going to his office. He has full control over the share and NTFS perms on \\hostname\Sitefinity and I believe I only had read access. I pointed the web site to the same \\hostname\Sitefinity\sitename share that the others were on and the authentication/authorization test settings passed. I hit the site from http://localhost (like I did successfully from the other two before trying the cluster's IP address) and I received a HTTP Error 401.3 - Unauthorized. I've verified many times that the application pool is running under the same service account. I tried hitting just a simple test.htm.. works fine on both of the first two servers but I get the same 401.3 on the third. I copied my dev project to the local inetpub directory and re-pointed the website and that ran perfectly. I turned on Failed Request Tracing and it acts like it's still running the local IUSR account I guess (instead of my domain account)? Here is an excerpt of the File Cache Access Start and the error from the trace: FileName \\hostname\sitefinity\sitename\test.htm UserName IUSR DomainName NT AUTHORITY ---------- Successful false FileFromCache false FileAddedToCache false FileDirmoned true LastModCheckErrorIgnored true ErrorCode 2147942405 LastModifiedTime ErrorCode Access is denied. (0x80070005) ---------- ModuleName IIS Web Core Notification 2 HttpStatus 401 HttpReason Unauthorized HttpSubStatus 3 ErrorCode 2147942405 ConfigExceptionInfo Notification AUTHENTICATE_REQUEST ErrorCode Access is denied. (0x80070005) ---------- My personal AD account was then granted read/write perms to the share so I created a new application pool and set the site under it in case there was an issue with the application pool but no success. I created another under my own account and it still failed. It just seems like maybe it's not trying to access the files under the account my application pools are running under although that's the only way I've done things before. I set the Physicial Path Credentials in Advanced Settings on the site to the service account and it threw a 500 error of some sort so I assume that's not the answer (and I don't have to do it on the other servers). It's like somehow I'm trying to force impersonation on the IUSR account or something?

    Read the article

  • Anonymous user with proftpd on fedora

    - by stukerr
    Hi there, I am trying to setup an anonymous user account on our server to enable people to downlaod technical manuals for our products etc. and I would like this to be as secure as possible! I was just wondering if anyone knew a series of steps that will allow me to create an anonymous ftp account linked to a directory on the server that enables download only ? Also how could i make a corresponding ftp account with write priviledges to this account to allow people within our company to upload new files ? Sorry i'm a bit new to all this! Many Thanks, Stuart

    Read the article

  • Allow certain users to access a specific directory?

    - by animuson
    I'm trying to figure out how to allow certain users who are also me to access a directory of files that I want to use for all of my users. I'm using cPanel and I used WHM to create three separate accounts. The files I want to use are on account1 in the directory /home/account1/public_html/source/engines and I want the directory /home/account2/public_html/source/engines to use the same exact files without having to upload them to both places every time I change them, so I created a simple symbolic link and added account2 to the group account1 (while still keeping its own group as the primary). It still gives me a Permission Denied error though. Is there any way I can grant account2 and other accounts that I create for myself access to those files? I don't want them to be global to all users because I don't want my hosted users to be able to access them, only my users. groups account1 returns account1 : account1 groups account2 returns account2 : account2 account1 /home/account1/public_html/source/engines and all its files belongs to account1:account1 Any other information you might need just ask.

    Read the article

  • chown: changing ownership of `.': Invalid argument

    - by Pierre
    I'm trying to install some new files on our new server while our sysadmin is in holidays: Here is my df # df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb3 273G 11G 248G 5% / tmpfs 48G 260K 48G 1% /dev/shm /dev/sdb1 485M 187M 273M 41% /boot xxx.xx.xxx.xxx:/commun 63T 2.2T 61T 4% /commun as root , I can create a new directory and run chown under /home/lindenb # cd /home/lindenb/ # mkdir X # chown lindenb X but I cannot run the same command under /commun # cd /commun/data/users/lindenb/ # mkdir X # chown lindenb X chown: changing ownership of `X': Invalid argument why ? how can I fix this ? updated: mount: /dev/sdb3 on / type ext4 (rw) proc on /proc type proc (rw) sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620) tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw) /dev/sdb1 on /boot type ext4 (rw) none on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw) sunrpc on /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs type rpc_pipefs (rw) xxx.xx.xxx.xxx:/commun on /commun type nfs (rw,noatime,noac,hard,intr,vers=4,addr=xxx.xx.xxx.xxx,clientaddr=xxx.xx.xxx.xxx) version: $ cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 6.3 (Final)

    Read the article

  • Java 6.0 Virtual Machine re-caches application on every load

    - by David Neale
    I have a Java application which is loaded and cached by the JRE and for most users it only needs to cache once unless the application software has changed. However, I have one computer that caches the entire application every time they load it. It is not the version of the JRE, I have that running on other machines. It also works on this machine if logged in as a local admin, just not as a standard user. Does anybody have any ideas on what might be causing this?

    Read the article

  • Puppet Directory and File ownership ignored

    - by Phil Sturgeon
    Puppet seems to be lying to me, which is not very nice. I am trying to set some files and directories included in /vagrant/src to be 666 and 777, and set the ownership group to the correct Apache user (using the PuppetLabs Apache module). Output from Puppet says yes. [default] Running provisioner: Vagrant::Provisioners::Puppet... [default] Running Puppet with /tmp/vagrant-puppet/manifests/default.pp... stdin: is not a tty No LSB modules are available. warning: require is a metaparam; this value will inherit to all contained resources warning: notify is a metaparam; this value will inherit to all contained resources notice: /Stage[main]//File[/vagrant/src/addons/]/owner: owner changed 'vagrant' to 'www-data' notice: /Stage[main]//File[/vagrant/src/addons/]/group: group changed 'vagrant' to 'www-data' notice: /Stage[main]//File[/vagrant/src/addons/]/mode: mode changed '0755' to '0777' notice: /Stage[main]//Package[curl]/ensure: ensure changed 'purged' to 'present' notice: /Stage[main]//File[/vagrant/src/system/cms/config/]/owner: owner changed 'vagrant' to 'www-data' notice: /Stage[main]//File[/vagrant/src/system/cms/config/]/group: group changed 'vagrant' to 'www-data' notice: /Stage[main]//File[/vagrant/src/system/cms/config/]/mode: mode changed '0755' to '0777' notice: /Stage[main]//File[/vagrant/src/system/cms/config/config.php]/owner: owner changed 'vagrant' to 'www-data' notice: /Stage[main]//File[/vagrant/src/system/cms/config/config.php]/group: group changed 'vagrant' to 'www-data' notice: /Stage[main]//File[/vagrant/src/system/cms/cache/]/owner: owner changed 'vagrant' to 'www-data' notice: /Stage[main]//File[/vagrant/src/system/cms/cache/]/group: group changed 'vagrant' to 'www-data' notice: /Stage[main]//File[/vagrant/src/system/cms/cache/]/mode: mode changed '0755' to '0777' notice: /Stage[main]//File[/vagrant/src/uploads/]/owner: owner changed 'vagrant' to 'www-data' notice: /Stage[main]//File[/vagrant/src/uploads/]/group: group changed 'vagrant' to 'www-data' notice: /Stage[main]//File[/vagrant/src/uploads/]/mode: mode changed '0755' to '0777' notice: /Stage[main]/Apache/Service[httpd]/ensure: ensure changed 'stopped' to 'running' notice: /Stage[main]//File[/vagrant/src/assets/cache/]/owner: owner changed 'vagrant' to 'www-data' notice: /Stage[main]//File[/vagrant/src/assets/cache/]/group: group changed 'vagrant' to 'www-data' notice: /Stage[main]//File[/vagrant/src/assets/cache/]/mode: mode changed '0755' to '0777' notice: Finished catalog run in 2.29 seconds Output from ls -lah says no: $ ls -lah /vagrant/src/ total 36K drwxr-xr-x 1 vagrant vagrant 510 2012-07-03 00:11 . drwxr-xr-x 1 vagrant vagrant 340 2012-07-03 08:08 .. drwxr-xr-x 1 vagrant vagrant 136 2012-07-03 00:11 addons drwxr-xr-x 1 vagrant vagrant 102 2012-07-03 00:11 assets drwxr-xr-x 1 vagrant vagrant 510 2012-07-03 07:45 .git -rw-r--r-- 1 vagrant vagrant 1.3K 2012-07-03 00:11 .gitignore -rwxr-xr-x 1 vagrant vagrant 1.4K 2012-07-03 00:11 .htaccess -rwxr-xr-x 1 vagrant vagrant 8.8K 2012-07-03 00:11 index.php drwxr-xr-x 1 vagrant vagrant 442 2012-07-03 00:11 installer -rwxr-xr-x 1 vagrant vagrant 2.8K 2012-07-03 00:11 LICENSE -rw-r--r-- 1 vagrant vagrant 1.1K 2012-07-03 00:11 phpdoc.dist.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 vagrant vagrant 3.3K 2012-07-03 00:11 README.md drwxr-xr-x 1 vagrant vagrant 204 2012-07-03 00:11 system -rw-r--r-- 1 vagrant vagrant 42 2012-07-03 00:11 .travis.yml drwxr-xr-x 1 vagrant vagrant 102 2012-07-03 00:11 uploads Whats up with that? My entire config can be found here.

    Read the article

  • How do I enable write access for an sFTP only user under Ubuntu?

    - by Jon Cage
    I'm running Ubuntu 12.04 and am trying to configure a user to allow chroot'd sFTP connections to another section of the filesystem. I've added the following to my /etc/ssh/sshd_config file: Match Group mygroup X11Forwarding no AllowTcpForwarding no ForceCommand internal-sftp ChrootDirectory /home/%u I've set their home directory so that it's owned by root but has their group. I've created a mount --bind from /home/myuser/transfers to /my/filesystem which appears to be navigable. The problem I'm having is that I'm not able to write to any part of the filesystem which makes this pretty useless as an FTP server. What am I missing? What can I check?

    Read the article

  • What is user/owner 24561?

    - by ralphthemagician
    So, I just installed the node.js package from nodejs.org and I was poking around to see what it installed. Over in /usr/local/bin I saw this owner 24561. I see it in a few other places too. What is this? What does it mean? Should it be root like everything else? lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 66 Jun 23 13:02 mate -> /Applications/TextMate.app/Contents/SharedSupport/Support/bin/mate -rwxr-xr-x 1 24561 wheel 18865984 Jun 29 09:32 node -rwxr-xr-x 1 24561 wheel 355 Jun 29 09:32 node-waf lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 38 Jul 3 12:15 npm -> ../lib/node_modules/npm/bin/npm-cli.js What was curious is that I couldn't find any other information about this user by Googling. Using OS X Lion 10.7.4 with Xcode installed if that makes any difference.

    Read the article

  • How to make new file permission inherit from the parent directory?

    - by Wai Yip Tung
    I have a directory called data. Then I am running a script under the user id 'robot'. robot writes to the data directory and update files inside. The idea is data is open for both me and robot to update. So I setup the permission and owner group like this drwxrwxr-x 2 me robot-grp 4096 Jun 11 20:50 data where both me and robot belongs to the 'robot-grp'. I change the permission and the owner group recursively like the parent directory. I regularly upload new files into the data directory using rsync. Unfortunately, new files uploaded does not inherit the parent directory's permission as I hope. Instead it looks like this -rw-r--r-- 1 me users 6 Jun 11 20:50 new-file.txt When robot tries to update new-file.txt, it fails due to lack of file permission. I'm not sure if setting umask helps. In anycase the new files does not really follow it. $ umask -S u=rwx,g=rx,o=rx I'm often confounded by Unix file permission. Do I even have a right plan? I'm using Debian lenny.

    Read the article

  • Is there a way to set access to WMI using GroupPolicy?

    - by Greg Domjan
    From various documentation it appears that to change WMI access you need to use WMI to access the running service and modify specific parts of the tree. Its kind of annoying changing 150,000 hosts using the UI. And then having to include such changes in the process of adding new hosts. Could write a script to do the same, but that needs to either connect to all those machines live, or be distributed for later update say in an startup/install script. And then you have to mess around with copying binary SD data from an example access control. I've also found you can change the wbem/*.mof file to include an SDDL but I'm really vague on how that all works at the moment. Am I just missing some point of simple administration?

    Read the article

  • NFS denies mount, even though the client is listed in exports

    - by ajdecon
    We have a couple of servers (part of an HPC cluster) in which we're currently seeing some NFS behavior which is not making sense to me. node1 exports its /lscratch directory via NFS to node2, mounted at /scratch/node1. node2 also exports its own lscratch, which is correspondingly mounted at /scratch/node2 on node1. Unfortunately, whenever I attempt to mount either NFS export on the opposite node, I get the following error: mount: node1:/lscratch failed, reason given by server: Permission denied This despite the fact that I have included first the IP range (10.6.0.0) and then the specific IPs (10.6.7.1, 10.6.7.2) in /etc/exports. Any suggestions? Edit to remove ambiguity: I've made sure that exports only contains either the range, or the specific IPs, not both at the same time.

    Read the article

  • Setting up SVN+SSH for multiple users through one local user.

    - by Warlax
    Hi, I need to make our SVN repository accessible through the firewall - but without creating a local user for each potential external user. Instead, I would like to set-up SVN+SSH to route all external users through a single local user name. We would like each external user to authenticate with SSH the regular way but then treat their instance of svnserve as if they're all that single local user and possibly, control what parts of the repository each external user can access. I know that I will need to set my svnserve config according to the official guide. I tried, but the instructions are fuzzy and I am relatively a Linux n00b. What exactly are the steps to proceed? and how would you go about testing this? Thanks for your help.

    Read the article

  • IIS6: How to troubleshoot a 404 error in an ASP.NET application?

    - by Tomalak
    I have an ASP.NET application on a Windows Server 2003/IIS6 that refuses to run for some reason (it's the Xerox Centre, if that info helps). It has been working flawlessly before though on this server. Now, all I get if I try to open the app homepage (http://some.intranet.server/XeroxCentreWareWeb/) is a "404 - File or directory not found" error. The app is configured to run in it's own app pool, which runs as Network Service. The Network Service account has read access to the configured directory. If I stop the app pool, I get the expected "Service Unavailable" message, meaning the app and its pool are wired correctly I tried to track down any file permission issues with procmon - nothing to be seen. There isn't even an access to the web app directory happening when the page loads. Interestingly, according to procmon, the web server accesses the 401-2 custom error file (Logon failed due to server configuration) first, but then decides to send the 404 down to the client. EDIT: The app runs with Windows-integrated authentication. Regular users have access to the app directory as well (I would have noticed file system "ACCESS DENIED" messages in procmon, if there had been any.) This makes me think that there is some kind of weird permission problem that occurs even before the application files are being accessed. I just have no idea where to look. I've tried to run the app pool as Local System for a test, but to no avail. What else could I check in this case?

    Read the article

  • WDS - Access to network share via local user

    - by Kenny Bones
    When installing Windows 7 using WDS, a local user account is used during the set up after the main image of Win7 is installed. And I've got this application that lies on the network and not the deploymentshare itself that I want to install. But logically I get no access to that share via the local user account. Is it possible to do this somehow? Or do I have to move the Share to the Deployment share? Or possibly map the share to a separate drive or something?

    Read the article

  • Script in include path not accessible to home user

    - by François ? Vespa ?
    So I have put a shortcut to one my scripts into /usr/bin so it is included. But command can be run only by root, other users failed to run it :( $ sudo su # chmod +x /opt/altf2/altf2 # ln -s /opt/altf2/altf2 /usr/bin/altf2 # altf2 It's working # chmod 777 /opt/altf2/altf2 # chmod 777 /usr/bin/altf2 # su francois $ altf2 gedit altf2: command not found $ /usr/bin/altf2 bash: /usr/bin/altf2: Permission denied

    Read the article

  • IIS permission configuration issue

    - by Dan
    Sorry the title of this question is a little ambiguous but I don't really have any idea where the issue lies - I'm seeking some clarification of the server error logs. Basically, I had a dedicated server running Windows 2003 and Plesk (v8 I think). Last week the server hardware failed and the entire thing had to be rebuilt from scratch. New hardware was put in, new operating system (Win2008), new Plesk installation (v9.5), new software (MSSQL etc) then all data ported over manually from old C and D drives to restore all 30 client sites. It was hell! All has been okay for a couple of days now but about an hour ago POP! Suddenly all sites went down giving a 500 error. Restarting all services eventually brought everything back online, but I'm now living in total fear. It can - and probably will - happen again. The guys on support gave me the following errors from the server log: The Template Persistent Cache initialization failed for Application Pool 'ASP.NET v4.0 Classic' because of the following error: Could not create a Disk Cache Sub-directory for the Application Pool. The data may have additional error codes.. The worker process for application pool 'domain1.com(domain)(2.0)(pool)' encountered an error 'Cannot read configuration file ' trying to read configuration data from file '\\?\C:\inetpub\temp\apppools\domain1.com(domain)(2.0)(pool).config', line number '0'. The data field contains the error code. The worker process for application pool 'PleskControlPanel' encountered an error 'Cannot read configuration file ' trying to read configuration data from file '\\?\C:\inetpub\temp\apppools\PleskControlPanel.config', line number '0'. The data field contains the error code. The support guys are so ambiguous about this and it scares me horribly. Can anyone positively identify the cause of this error which lead to all client website going offline? What can be done to prevent it from happening again? Any pointers would be very much appreciated! Thanks folks...

    Read the article

  • LDAP (slapd) creating users with access to specific trees

    - by Josh
    I am setting up a CentOS server with Virtualmin and Postfix, and I am trying to use LDAP to store unix users, groups, Postfix aliases and virtual domains. I am following the instructions from Webmin's site. I have created an LDAP domain and configured Postfix to fetch Aliases and Virtual Domains from LDAP, but in order to do so I had to configure postfix to authenticate with the master LDAP account, cn=Manager,dc=mydomain,dc=com. This seems like a terrible idea because that account has access to the Users and Groups, which postfix does not need access to. How can I create a new LDAP account for Postfix which only has access to the LDAP trees Postfix needs?

    Read the article

  • Mac creating files w/ wrong perms on samba share

    - by geoffjentry
    In my group, which is very heterogeneous in terms of machines, we use a samba share to collaborate on files and such. In all but one case, it works as expected (or at least close enough). The one exception is my boss' laptop, a snow leopard macbook air. On his desktop (also snow leopard), if he creates a file it ends up serverside with perms of 774, but when he creates it with the Air, the perms are 644. The key problem is the lack of group write permission on the laptop created files. What's really confusing is that everything that I've looked at on the two machines are identical - same version of OS X, same version of samba (3.0.25b-apple), same settings for the same software, etc. I can't imagine why one machine would be different than the other, but it is. To try to be complete w/ the description, here is the relevant portion of my smb.conf file: comment = my Share path = /path/to/share public = no writeable = yes printable = no force group = myshare directory mask = 0770 create mask = 0770 force create mode = 0770 force directory mode = 0770 EDIT: I looked at three more Macs and all of them worked as expected which leaves this one laptop the true oddball. This wasn't as good as a test as the others though, as they were all leopard.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85  | Next Page >