Search Results

Search found 5813 results on 233 pages for 'googe chrome'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 79/233 | < Previous Page | 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86  | Next Page >

  • select tag sits one pixel lower in Firefox than it does in Chrome

    - by sepoto
    #allday { width: 180px; height: 20px; margin-top: 2px !important; margin-right: 0px; padding: 0px; -webkit-appearance: menulist; box-sizing: border-box; -webkit-box-align: center; border: 1px solid; border-image: initial; white-space: pre; -webkit-rtl-ordering: logical; color: black; background-color: white; cursor: default; } I inspected the element in both browsers but I'm not really seeing where the discrepancy is. Has anyone been through this before with the select tag?

    Read the article

  • CSS Style Firefox/Safari/Chrome

    - by patrick
    hi, i have a problem with css differences between browsers. i have a simple input textfield an a submit button. the should be arranged. with webkit (safari/webkit) everything looks fine but firefox doesnt do it. does anyone have an idea whats wrong? i have written a little test html page: <html> <head> <style type="text/css"> #input { background: none repeat scroll 0 0 white; border-color: #DCDCDC; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 0 1px 1px; font: 13px "Lucida Grande",Arial,Sans-serif; margin: 0; padding: 5px 5px 5px 15px; width: 220px; outline-width: 0; height: 30px; } #submit { background: none repeat scroll 0 0 white; border: 1px solid #DCDCDC; font: 13px "Lucida Grande",Arial,Sans-serif; margin: 0; outline-width: 0; height: 30px; padding: 5px 10px; } </style> </head> <body> <input id="input" type="text" value="" /><input id="submit" type="button" value="Add" /> </body> </html>

    Read the article

  • fadeToggle() fails on chrome/safari due to display block on <a> tag

    - by kylex
    http://jsfiddle.net/GGsEt/3/ Works on firefox HTML <ul> <li class="lib_undefined"> <span class="hidden_toggle"> <a href="/">Test</a> </span> </li> </ul> ? CSS .hidden_toggle{ text-align: center; font-size: 20px; font-weight: 600; color: #999; line-height: 80px; display: none; } .hidden_toggle a{ color: #999; border: none; display: block; width: 100%; height: 90px; } .lib_undefined{ min-height: 90px; border: 1px solid #000; } jQuery $('.lib_undefined').hover(function(){ $(this).children('.hidden_toggle').fadeToggle(); });? Any known fixes? The a tag needs to fill the entire li, which is why display is set to block.

    Read the article

  • I need something to automate web browser tasks in its own virtual enviorment (Chrome)

    - by user1745926
    Ever since i started learning java i wanted to create a way to automate a few actions on a couple websites, For example, topline is a website that replaces all your ads with its own ads and pays you a bit of money for it, i want to emulate the act of just surfing the web, then start emulating specific tasks like clicking certain buttons or playing flash games (Actually playing the game by using image recognition) and this has to be written in java as i want to run this on a raspberry pi. any help is appreciated, is there a class that i can use? any help is appreciated!

    Read the article

  • IE innerHTML chops sentence if the last word contains '&' (ampersand)

    - by Mandai
    I am trying to populate a DOM element with ID 'myElement'. The content which I'm populating is a mix of text and HTML elements. Assume following is the content I wish to populate in my DOM element. var x = "<b>Success</b> is a matter of hard work &luck"; I tried using innerHTML as follows, document.getElementById("myElement").innerHTML=x; This resulted in chopping off of the last word in my sentence. Apparently, the problem is due to the '&' character present in the last word. I played around with the '&' and innerHTML and following are my observations. If the last word of the content is less than 10 characters and if it has a '&' character present in it, innerHTML chops off the sentence at '&'. This problem does not happen in firefox. If I use innerText the last word is in tact but then all the HTML tags which are part of the content becomes plain text. I tried populating through jQuery's #html method, $("#myElement").html(x); This approach solves the problem in IE but not in chrome. How can I insert a HTML content with a last word containing '&' without it being chopped off in all browsers?

    Read the article

  • How does one target all divs of any webpage but differentiate them in javascript?

    - by Chaz
    So I am trying to create an extension in Chrome (a prototype for a project that I am doing) that targets all of the <div> tags of any web page, hides them or rather doesn't display them until the user clicks the mouse (further explained below). So typing a url into the browser yields a white page. The person clicks, and the first <div> appears (probably the mast head or menu). The user clicks again and the second <div> appears. I have gotten to the point where I can hide or show all <div>'s (the obvious easy part) but I am not sure how to go about targeting each since every website has different id's for them while still using the <div> tag. This is what I need the most help with. This is part of a grander operation called the Web Crank. It's just a physical crank that controls the speed by which a web page loads. Each time you make one full rotation of the crank, one section (the first <div>) of the web page loads. The faster you go, the quicker the page loads. I hope this is clear enough. I am a newbie when it comes to this, but I have done some minor coding in the past and it's not such a big deal. Thanks for your help!

    Read the article

  • Why don't file type filters work properly with nsIFilePicker on Mac OSX?

    - by Eric Strom
    I am running a chrome app in firefox (started with -app) with the following code to open a filepicker: var nsIFilePicker = Components.interfaces.nsIFilePicker; var fp = Components.classes["@mozilla.org/filepicker;1"] .createInstance(nsIFilePicker); fp.init(window, "Select Files", nsIFilePicker.modeOpenMultiple); fp.appendFilter("video", "*.mov; *.mpg; *.mpeg; *.avi; *.flv; *.m4v; *.mp4"); fp.appendFilter("all", "*.*"); var res = fp.show(); if (res == nsIFilePicker.returnCancel) return; var files = fp.files; var paths = []; while (files.hasMoreElements()) { var arg = files.getNext().QueryInterface( Components.interfaces.nsILocalFile ).path; paths.push(arg); } Everything seems to work fine on Windows, and the file picker itself works on OSX, but the dropdown menu to select between file types only displays in Windows. The first filter (video in this case) is in effect, but the dropdown to select the other type never shows. Is there something extra that is needed to get this working on OSX? I have tried the latest firefox (3.6) and an older one (3.0.13) and both don't show the file type dropdown on OSX.

    Read the article

  • Browser: Cookie lost on refresh

    - by Nirmal
    I am experiencing a strange behaviour of my application in Chrome browser (No problem with other browsers). When I refresh a page, the cookie is being sent properly, but intermittently the browser doesn't seem to pass the cookie on some refreshes. This is how I set my cookie: $identifier = / some weird string /; $key = md5(uniqid(rand(), true)); $timeout = number_format(time(), 0, '.', '') + 43200; setcookie('fboxauth', $identifier . ":" . $key, $timeout, "/", "fbox.mysite.com", 0); This is what I am using for page headers: header("Last-Modified: " . gmdate("D, d M Y H:i:s") . " GMT"); header("Cache-Control: no-cache, must-revalidate"); // HTTP/1.1 header("Expires: Thu, 25 Nov 1982 08:24:00 GMT"); // Date in the past Do you see any issue here that might affect the cookie handling? Thank you for any suggestion. EDIT-01: It seems that the cookie is not being sent with some requests. This happens intermittently and I am seeing this behaviour for ALL the browsers now. Has anyone come across such situation? Is there any situation where a cookie will not be sent with the request? Thanks again, for any guideline.

    Read the article

  • production vs dev server content-disposition filename encoding

    - by rgripper
    I am using asp.net mvc3, download file in the same browser (Chrome 22). Here is the controller code: [HttpPost] public ActionResult Uploadfile(HttpPostedFileBase file)//HttpPostedFileBase file, string excelSumInfoId) { ... return File( result.Output, "application/vnd.ms-excel", String.Format("{0}_{1:yyyy.MM.dd-HH.mm.ss}.xls", "????????????", DateTime.Now)); } On my dev machine I download a programmatically created file with the correct name "????????????_2012.10.18-13.36.06.xls". Response: Content-Disposition:attachment; filename*=UTF-8''%D0%A1%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_2012.10.18-13.36.06.xls Content-Length:203776 Content-Type:application/vnd.ms-excel Date:Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:36:06 GMT Server:ASP.NET Development Server/10.0.0.0 X-AspNet-Version:4.0.30319 X-AspNetMvc-Version:3.0 And from production server I download a file with the name of the controller's action + correct extension "Uploadfile.xls", which is wrong. Response: Content-Disposition:attachment; filename="=?utf-8?B?0KHRg9C80LzQuNGA0L7QstCw0L3QuNC1XzIwMTIuMTAuMTgtMTMuMzYu?=%0d%0a =?utf-8?B?NTUueGxz?=" Content-Length:203776 Content-Type:application/vnd.ms-excel Date:Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:36:55 GMT Server:Microsoft-IIS/7.5 X-AspNet-Version:4.0.30319 X-AspNetMvc-Version:3.0 X-Powered-By:ASP.NET Web.config files are the same on both machines. Why does filename gets encoded differently for the same browser? Are there any kinds of default settings in web.config that are different on machines that I am missing?

    Read the article

  • Browsers disagree about the text of a body element

    - by Charles Anderson
    My HTML looks like this: <html> <head> <title>Test</title> <script type="text/javascript" src="jQuery.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> function init() { var text = jQuery('body').text(); alert('length = ' + text.length); } </script> </head> <body onload="init()">0123456789</body> </html> When I load this in Firefox, the length is reported as 10. However, in Chrome it's 11 because it thinks there's a linefeed after the '9'. In IE it's also 11, but the last character is an escape. Meanwhile, Opera thinks there are 12 characters, with the last two being CR LF. If I change the body element to include a span: <body onload="init()"><span>0123456789</span></body> and the jQuery call to: var text = jQuery('body span').text(); then all the browsers agree that the length is 10. Clearly it's the body element that's causing the issue, but can anyone explain exactly why this is happening? I'm particularly surprised because the excellent jQuery is normally browser-independent.

    Read the article

  • Flash won't load, embed error?

    - by Adrian M.
    Hello, I want to know why the flash movie in the header located here: http://www.dolphintemplate.com/demo/dolphin7/index.php?skin=dt_firestarter_red only loads in Firefox but NOT in IE and Chrome.. The flash movie resides in a iframe, this is the code of the iframe: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" > <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" /> <title>header</title> </head> <body bgcolor="#000000" topmargin="0" leftmargin="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0"> <object data="header.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" id="myflash" width="988" height="240"> <param name="movie" value="header.swf" /> <param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /> <param name="height" value="988" /> <param name="width" value="240" /> <param name="quality" value="high" /> <param name="menu" value="false" /> <param name="allowscriptaccess" value="samedomain" /> <p>Adobe <a href="http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/">Flash Player</a> is required to view this content.</p> </object> </body> </html> Thanks.

    Read the article

  • jQuery('body').text() gives different answers in different browsers

    - by Charles Anderson
    My HTML looks like this: <html> <head> <title>Test</title> <script type="text/javascript" src="jQuery.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> function init() { var text = jQuery('body').text(); alert('length = ' + text.length); } </script> </head> <body onload="init()">0123456789</body> </html> When I load this in Firefox, the length is reported as 10. However, in Chrome it's 11 because it thinks there's a linefeed after the '9'. In IE it's also 11, but the last character is an escape. Meanwhile, Opera thinks there are 12 characters, with the last two being CR LF. If I change the body element to include a span: <body onload="init()"><span>0123456789</span></body> and the jQuery call to: var text = jQuery('body span').text(); then all the browsers agree that the length is 10. Clearly it's the body element that's causing the issue, but can anyone explain exactly why this is happening? I'm particularly surprised because the excellent jQuery is normally browser-independent.

    Read the article

  • SVG text parameter changing on conversion to image uri : random dy on tspan element

    - by Kitex
    Sorry that I could not compile jsfiddle because it's jsf application hosted locally and code is dependent on data from jsf application. Although I have arrange part of it and part if it as snippet here. Now Everything's correct in Firefox. Suddenly when I open it in chrome something happened. The text on raphael paper suddenly gets scattered in the paper. It's not where it's meant to be. This happens when I convert svg to image and again generate svg. Everything works fine in Firefox. There is chagne id dy of tspan dy=3.09499999 dy=432.0949999999999 Why is there this change in dy although x and y are same? SVG Correct: The fiddle is here. SVG Incorrect: The fiddle is here. function printMap(){ var svg = $('#map').html().replace(/>\s+/g, ">").replace(/\s+</g, "<"); // strips off all spaces between tags canvg('cvs', svg, { ignoreMouse: true, ignoreAnimation: true }); var canvas = document.getElementById('cvs'); var img = canvas.toDataURL("image/png"); $("#resImg").attr("src",img); $("#resImg").css("display",'block'); //$("resImg").css("display",'none'); $("#map").css("display",'none'); // location.href = img; } Before: Text are above the object: After: Texts are scattered:

    Read the article

  • controlling css with javascript works with mozilla but not with webkit based browsers

    - by GlassGhost
    Im having problems with applying css text variable in this javascript with webkit based browsers(Chrome & Safari) but it works in firefox 3.6 the function: function addGlobalStyle(sCss) { var head = document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0]; if( !head || head == null ) { return false; } var oStyle = document.createElement('style'); oStyle.type = 'text/css'; oStyle.rel = 'stylesheet'; oStyle.media = 'screen'; if ( is_gecko ) { // firefox WORKING !!! oStyle.href = 'FireFox.css'; oStyle.innerHTML = sCss; head.appendChild(oStyle); return true; } else {//nothing but firefox works oStyle.href = 'FireFox.css'; oStyle.innerHTML = sCss; head.appendChild(oStyle); return true; } } the use of the function: var NewSyleText = //The page styling "h1, h2, h3, h4, h5 {font-family: 'Verdana','Helvetica',sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight:normal;}" + "body, b {background: #fbfbfb; font-style: normal; font-family: 'Cochin','GaramondNo8','Garamond','Big Caslon','Georgia','Times',serif;font-size: 11pt;}" + "p { margin: 0pt; text-indent:2.5em; margin-top: 0.3em; }" + "a { text-decoration: none; color: Navy; background: none;}" + "a:visited { color: #500050;}" + "a:active { color: #faa700;}" + "a:hover { text-decoration: underline;}"; addGlobalStyle(NewSyleText);//inserts the page styling

    Read the article

  • contentscript, dynamic created iframe, postmessage

    - by thefoyer
    I'm attempting to inject an iframe from a content script. From the content script, post a message to the iframe, without much success. This is the closest I have got. No errors/warnings in the console but it doesn't work (alert test). contentscript: var iframe = document.createElement("iframe"); iframe.setAttribute("src", "https://www.com/iframe.php"); iframe.id = "iframe01"; document.getElementsByTagName("body")[0].appendChild(iframe); //then I inject this "web_accessible_resources" script var script = document.createElement("script"); script.type = "text/javascript"; script.src = chrome.extension.getURL("postMessage.js"); document.getElementsByTagName("head")[0].appendChild(script); postMessage.js window.postMessage({msg: "test"}, "*"); I've also tried top.postMessage({msg: "test"}, "*"); And var iframe = document.getElementById('iframe01'); iframe.contentWindow.postMessage({msg: "test"}, "*"); EDIT: I tried to make sure the iframe was loaded before postMessage, even if I put an alert there, it would alert telling me the iframe was loaded. var iframe = document.getElementById('iframe01'); if (ifrm_prsto.contentWindow.document) //do postMessage EDIT2: I did get it to work by moving the iframe from the contentscript to the inject.js script. Wasn't totally ideal but I do have it working now, I guess. iframe.php window.addEventListener("message", function(e) {alert("test");}); I am however able to do the reverse, talk to the parent script from the iframe.

    Read the article

  • Chrome intègre Google Instant grâce à des performances améliorées et passe la barre des 120 millions d'utilisateurs

    Chrome intègre Google Instant et passe la barre des 120 millions d'utilisateurs Mise à jour du 08.12.2010 par Katleen Lors de sa keynote évènement d'hier soir, Google a fait quelques annonces concernant son navigateur. Il est désormais utilisé quotidiennement par 120 millions de personnes. C'est encore "peu" au regard de certains, et du marché, mais cela représente tout de même une sacrée évolution par rapport aux 70 millions d'internautes qui l'utilisaient chaque jour en mai 2010. Ceci alloue au logiciel la troisième place mondiale (9.26% de part de marché), derrière Internet Explorer et Firefox. Chrome intégrera également Google Instant dans l'omnibox et dans...

    Read the article

  • How to make Chrome/Chromium remember passwords in the gnome seahorse keyring?

    - by berkes
    Is it possible to make chrome or chromium (as that comes default in the repos) to use the Gnome seahorse as password vault? I have not found a way to do this for Firefox either, but maybe a solution for Firefox will lead to a solution for Chrome. FYI: Epiphany is properly integrated into Gnome by default, and does use the default password vault. It would be great to at least have all passwords in a single, actually secure, place, instead of laying around in my home-dir. Even better would be if somehow they could re-use eachothers passwords, but that depends on the implementation of this integration, i guess.

    Read the article

  • Google intègre le support de WebM à Chrome et rechange la licence du nouveau codec vidéo issu du VP8

    Mise à jour du 07/06/10 VP8 vs H.264 : Google intègre le support du WebM à Chrome Et rechange la licence du nouveau standard vidéo issu du VP8 Les choses s'accélèrent pour le projet WebM issu du VP8, un standard vidéo que Google a décidé de rendre open-source, et du Ogg-Vorbis (lire ci-avant). Première nouvelle, Chrome intègre à présent le support du WebM. Firefox et Opera avaient déjà fait savoir qu'ils travaillaient sur le sujet. Tout comme Microsoft. La version pour développeurs du navigateur de Google (téléchargeable sur le dev channel) permettra donc à tout un chacun de se faire une opinion personnelle sur les qua...

    Read the article

  • Acer dit qu'il ne lancera pas de netbook sous Chrome OS, doit-on croire cette déclaration ?

    Mise à jour du 19.05.2010 par Katleen Acer dit qu'il ne lancera pas de netbook sous Chrome OS, doit-on croire cette déclaration ? Acer a finalement démenti être en passe de présenter un netbook tournant sous Chrome dans quelques jours, à l'occasion du Computex de Taïpeï (du 1er au 5 juin). C'est le site VentureBeat qui avait lancé la rumeur de l'arrivée d'un tel produit lors de cet évènement, et l'appareil était depuis attendu de pied ferme. Le constructeur taïwanais a donc réfuté travailler sur un tel produit...mais pas de manière définitive et sans appel. «Acer confirme aujourd'hui qu'il n'a aucun plan à court terme pour un tel produit », a déclaré un porte parole du groupe.

    Read the article

  • Chrome : nouveau logo plus épuré et plus abstrait, la version 11 pour développeurs peaufine également la gestion des onglets

    Nouveau logo plus épuré et abstrait pour Chrome La version 11 pour développeurs peaufine également la gestion des onglets Mise à jour du 16/03/11 Depuis le 9 mars, on savait que Google y réfléchissait. Cette fois-ci c'est officiel, Chrome change de logo. A l'occasion de la sortie de la version 11 de son navigateur sur le canal développeur, Google a ajouté ses couleurs traditionnelles au nouveau logo, plat, plus abstrait et plus épuré. Un logo qui était apparu (en bleu) sur un fil de discussion de Chromium (lire ci-avant). [IMG]http://ftp-developpez.com/gordon-fowler/Nouveau%20Logo%20Chrome.png[/IMG] Cette nouveau...

    Read the article

  • Un bug de la barre de recherche de Chrome 20 fait croire à un malware, comment y remédier

    Un bug de la barre de recherche de Chrome 20 fait croire à un malware Comment y remédier Depuis sa version 20, Chrome contient un bug assez ennuyeux : la barre de recherche mène automatiquement sur une page blanche. Le 1er réflexe de nombreux utilisateurs a été de penser que ce comportement était dû à un nouveau malware. En fait, il n'en est rien. Si vous faîtes partie de ceux qui se sont inquiétés, rassurez vous. La solution temporaire est très simple ? bien que laborieuse. Il suffit de supprimer "blank.html" de l'URL générée. Cette solution a été trouvée après 116 messages sur le Google Group dédié au problème. [IMG]http://ftp-developpez...

    Read the article

  • Chrome : une extension pour bloquer les résultats de recherche indésirables et lutter contre les fermes de contenus

    Chrome : une extension pour bloquer les résultats de recherche indésirables Et lutter contre les fermes de contenus Google vient de publier une extension pour son navigateur Google Chrome pour permettre aux utilisateurs de bloquer un site directement depuis les résultats de son moteur de recherche. Google veut ainsi lutter contre les spams et les fermes de contenus. L'extension, baptisée « Personal Blocklist » ajoute un lien sous chaque résultat de recherche, lien qui donne la possibilité à l'utilisateur de supprimer l'affichage des résultats qu'il juge indésirables. Ces sites sont alors enregistrés dans une liste noire que l'utilisateur peut consulter depuis Google ou depu...

    Read the article

  • La version finale de Chrome OS sortira à l'automne 2010, le système révolutionnera-t-il le marché de

    Mise à jour du 03.06.2010 par Katleen La version finale de Chrome OS sortira à l'automne 2010, le système révolutionnera-t-il le marché des applications web ? Google vient de donner des nouvelles de son futur système d'exploitation maison : Chrome OS. En cours de développement, sa version finale devrait être disponible au cours du quatrième trimestre 2010. Les premiers ordinateurs équipés de l'OS devraient donc arriver cet automne dans les boutiques. Le système étant basé sur Linux, il sera vraisemblablement distribué gratuitement à l'instar des autres distributions. Cependant, il se peut que seuls les machines d'une liste établie par Google soient gratifiés de pilotes les rendant totalement compatib...

    Read the article

  • Google propose 4 UI pour les prochaines versions de Chrome, laquelle préférez-vous ? L'une supprime l'affichage de la barre d'adresses

    Google propose 4 UI pour les prochaines versions de Chrome, laquelle préférez-vous ? L'une supprime l'affichage de la barre d'adresses L'équipe de développement de Chrome travaille sur les futures versions du navigateur, et dans ce cadre, elle hésite entre plusieurs interfaces utilisateur (pour la version Windows du logiciel uniquement). L'une de ces propositions fait débat : compacte, elle suggère d'enlever la barre d'adresses. Pour entrer une URL, ou bien pour l'éditer, il faudra alors se contenter de l'espace réduit où s'affiche généralement le titre d'une page dans un onglet. Une telle idée vous séduit-elle ? Et que pensez-vous des autres UI en chantier ? Les voici : - Version 1 : "Classiqu...

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86  | Next Page >