Search Results

Search found 19367 results on 775 pages for 'array unique'.

Page 8/775 | < Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  | Next Page >

• PHP : flatten array - fastest way?

  - by Industrial

  Is there any fast way to flatten an array and select subkeys ('key'&'value' in this case) without running a foreach loop, or is the foreach always the fastest way? Array ( [0] => Array ( [key] => string [value] => a simple string [cas] => 0 ) [1] => Array ( [key] => int [value] => 99 [cas] => 0 ) [2] => Array ( [key] => array [value] => Array ( [0] => 11 [1] => 12 ) [cas] => 0 ) ) To: Array ( [int] => 99 [string] => a simple string [array] => Array ( [0] => 11 [1] => 12 ) )

  Read the article

• Why I lose certain values from array?

  - by blankon91

  I've the code to input the values dynamically, when I use it to add the values for the first time, it's fine, but when I want to edit it, the old values didn't inserted on sql query but the new values inserted Here is the example: http://i.stack.imgur.com/dwugS.jpg here is the code: ============the function================= sub ShowItemfgEdit(query,selItemName,defValue,num,cdisable) response.write "<select " & cdisable & " num=""" & num & """ id=""itemCombo"" name=""" & selItemName & """ class=""label"" onchange=""varUsage.ChangeSatuanDt(this)"">" if NOT query.BOF then query.moveFirst WHILE NOT query.EOF tulis = "" if trim(defValue) = trim(query("ckdbarang")) then tulis = "selected" end if response.write "<option value=""" & trim(query("ckdbarang")) & """" & tulis & ">" & trim(query("ckdbarang")) & " - " & trim(query("vnamabarang")) query.moveNext WEND end if response.write "</select>" end sub ============calling the function================ <td class="rb" align="left"><% call ShowItemfgEdit(qGetItemfgGrp,"fitem",qGetUsageDt("ckdfg"),countLine,readonlyfg) %></td> ==============post the value====================== <input type="hidden" name="fitem" value=""> ================get the value=================== for i = 1 to request.form("hdnOrderNum") if request.form("selOrdItem_" & i) <> "" then 'bla...blaa...blaa... ckdfg = trim(request.form("fitem_" & i)) '<==here is the problem objCommand.commandText = "INSERT INTO IcTrPakaiDt " &_ "(id, id_h, ckdunitkey, cnopakai, dtglpakai, ckdbarang, ckdgudang, nqty1, nqty2, csatuan1, csatuan2, nqtypakai, csatuanpakai, vketerangan, cJnsPakai, ckdprodkey, ckdfg, ncountstart, ncountstop, ncounttotal) " &_ " VALUES " &_ " (" & idDt & ",'" & idHd & "','" & selLoc & "','" & nopakai & "','" & cDate(request.form("hdnUsageDate")) & "','" & trim(ckdbarang) & "','" & trim(ckdgudang) & "'," & nqty1 & "," & nqty2 & ",'" & trim(csatuan1) & "','" & trim(csatuan2) & "'," & nqtypakai & ",'" & csatuanpakai & "','" & trim(keteranganItem) & "','" & trim(cjnspakai) & "','" & ckdprodkey & "','" &ckdfg& "'," & cnt1 & "," & cnt2 & "," & totalcnt & ")" set qInsertPakaiDt = objCommand.Execute end if next problem: old value of ckdfg didn't inserted to query, but the new value inserted. How to fix this bug?

  Read the article

• Combining array values in multilevel array

  - by James Huckabone

  I have an array like so: array( 'a'=>array( 'a'=>3, 'f'=>5, 'sdf'=>0), 't'=>array( 'a'=>1, 'f'=>2, 'sdf'=>5), 'pps'=>array( 'a'=>1, 'f'=>2, 'sdf'=>3) ); Notice how the sub-arrays are the same for each top-level array. If I wanted to, what's the easiest way to combine the sub-arrays so that I'm left with a one-dimensional array like: array( 'a'=>5, 'f'=>9, 'sdf'=>8 );

  Read the article

• Setting unique key constraint for Db4oEmbedded EmbeddedConfiguration

  - by Viet

  Hi, I want to set unique key constraint for Db4oEmbedded EmbeddedConfiguration. Here goes my code: EmbeddedConfiguration myConf = Db4oEmbedded.newConfiguration(); myConf.common().objectClass(NotyUser.class).objectField("username").indexed(true); myConf.common().add(new com.db4o.constraints.UniqueFieldValueConstraint(NotyUser.class, "username")); The last line throws exception. I don't know why. I'm running Android SDK 1.5 and db4o 7.12 for Java. Please kindly advise. Thanks!

  Read the article

• Short unique id in php

  - by Antti

  I want to create a unique id but uniqid() is giving something like '492607b0ee414'. What i would like is something similar to what tinyurl gives: '64k8ra'. The shorter, the better. The only requirements are that it should not have an obvious order and that it should look prettier than a seemingly random sequence of numbers. Letters are preferred over numbers and ideally it would not be mixed case. As the number of entries will not be that many (up to 10000 or so) the risk of collision isn't a huge factor. Any suggestions appreciated.

  Read the article

• XSL unique values per node per position

  - by Nathan Colin

  this get ever more complicated :) now i face another issue in last question we managed to take unique values from only one parent node now with: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?> <roots> <root> <name>first</name> <item> <something>A</something> <something>A</something> </item> <item> <something>B</something> <something>A</something> </item> <item> <something>C</something> <something>P</something> </item> <item> <something>A</something> <something>L</something> </item> <item> <something>A</something> <something>A</something> </item> <item> <something>B</something> <something>A</something> </item> <item> <something>D</something> <something>A</something> </item> </root> <root> <name>second</name> <item> <something>E</something> <something>A</something> </item> <item> <something>B</something> <something>A</something> </item> <item> <something>F</something> <something>A</something> </item> <item> <something>A</something> <something>A</something> </item> <item> <something>A</something> <something>A</something> </item> <item> <something>B</something> <something>H</something> </item> <item> <something>D</something> <something>G</something> </item> </root> </roots> now i need to get the unique values depending only from one node before but just from the elements on the second position <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?> <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"> <xsl:output indent="yes" method="text"/> <xsl:key name="item-by-value" match="something" use="concat(normalize-space(.), ' ', generate-id(./ancestor::root))"/> <xsl:key name="rootkey" match="root" use="name"/> <xsl:template match="/"> <xsl:for-each select="key('rootkey','first')"> <xsl:for-each select="item/something[1]"> <xsl:sort /> <xsl:if test="generate-id() = generate-id(key('item-by-value', concat(normalize-space(.), ' ', generate-id(./ancestor::root))))"> <xsl:value-of select="."/> </xsl:if> </xsl:for-each> <xsl:text>_________</xsl:text> <xsl:for-each select="item/something[2]"> <xsl:sort /> <xsl:if test="generate-id() = generate-id(key('item-by-value', concat(normalize-space(.), ' ', generate-id(./ancestor::root))))"> <xsl:value-of select="."/> </xsl:if> </xsl:for-each> </xsl:for-each> </xsl:template> </xsl:stylesheet> with this XSL i get ABCD__LP where the result i need is ABCD__ALP any ideas?

  Read the article

• PHP MySQL INSERT fails due to unique constraint

  - by sjw

  On insert I am catching the unique constraint mysql_errno() 1062. This works fine but I want to find the existing row to re-instate or modify it. Is there are method to obtain the row id on insert fail? I tried mysql_insert_id() but realised that would only return the row I'm inserting (or failed to insert) therefore, I get 0. Is there no option but to issue another mysql_query and simply perform a select on the duplicate value? I just want to make sure there is no better, quicker, more economical way to do this.

  Read the article

• Get unique artist names from MPMediaQuery

  - by Akash Malhotra

  I am using MPMediaQuery to get all artists from library. Its returning unique names I guess but the problem is I have artists in my library like "Alice In Chains" and "Alice In Chains ". The second "Alice In Chains" has some white spaces at the end, so it returns both. I dont want that. Heres the code... MPMediaQuery *query=[MPMediaQuery artistsQuery]; NSArray *artists=[query collections]; artistNames=[[NSMutableArray alloc]init]; for(MPMediaItemCollection *collection in artists) { MPMediaItem *item=[collection representativeItem]; [artistNames addObject:[item valueForProperty:MPMediaItemPropertyArtist]]; } uniqueNames=[[NSMutableArray alloc]init]; for(id object in artistNames) { if(![uniqueNames containsObject:object]) { [uniqueNames addObject:object]; } } Any ideas?

  Read the article

• Problem with updating multiple rows which are in conflict with unique index

  - by GUZ

  I am using Microsoft SQL Server and I have a master-detail scenario where I need to store the order of details. So in the Detail table I have ID, MasterID, Position and some other columns. There is also a unique index on MasterID and Position. It works OK except one case: when I have some existing details and I change their order. For example when I change a detail on position 3 with a detail on position 2. When I save the detail on position 2 (which in the database has Position equal to 3) SQL Server protests, because the index uniqueness constraint. How to solve this problem in a reasonable way? Thank you in advance Lukasz Glaz

  Read the article

• Counting unique values in a column with a shell script

  - by Lilly Tooner

  Hello. I have a tab delimited file with 5 columns and need to retrieve a count of just the number of unique lines from column 2. I would normally do this with Perl/Python but I am forced to use the shell for this one. I have successfully in the past used *nix uniq function piped to wc but it looks like I am going to have to use awk in here. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. (I have asked a similar question previously about column checks using awk but this is a little different and I wanted to separate it so if someone in the future has this question this will be here) Many many thanks! Lilly

  Read the article

• Create unique file name and fetching it to commandline argument

  - by user343934

  Hi everyone, I am working on python right now and i am little bit stuck in performing some tricks. I have web form with two options- File upload and textarea, i can easily pass file name with file upload options but have problem when it's textarea. Because when i use textarea then first i have to save values passed from textarea to some files and save it on the working directory. After that i can execute commandline argument and pass same saved filename name. For this problem i have to generate unique file first and save the values passed from textarea in it. Can anybody give me some tips to solve my problem. Any algorithms, suggestions and lines of code are appreciated. Thanks for your concern

  Read the article

• Slow parity initialization of RAID-5 array on HP Smart Array 411 controller

  - by Rob Nicholson

  On 29th October 2011, I built a RAID-5 array using 4 x 146.8GB Seagate SAS ST3146855SS drives running at 15k connected to a PowerEdge R515 with HP Smart Array P411 controller running Windows 2008 (so nothing particularly unusual). I know that parity initialisation of a RAID-5 array can take some time but it's still running after 2.5 weeks which seems a little unusual. I'd previously built another array on the same controller using 4 x 2TB SATA-2 drives and that did take a while to complete but a) I'm sure it was less than 2.5 weeks, b) that array was ~12 times bigger and c) during initialization, the percentrage slowly increased each day. At the moment, the status display for this new 2nd array simply says "Parity Initialization Status: In Progress" and it's said that since the start. It's this lack of change on the status that worries me the most - feels like it's not actually doing anything. Do you think something has gone wrong or am I being unpatient and for some reason, the status not increasing is normal? I kind of expected a much smaller array on faster drives (15k SAS versus 7.5k SATA-2) to build in a few days. This is our primary SAN running StarWind so my "have a play" options are very limited. This 2nd array is currently in use for one small virtual disk so I could shut the target machine down, move the virtual disk to another drive and try rebuilding.

  Read the article

• PHP Function needed for GENERIC sorting of a recordset array

  - by donbriggs

  Somebody must have come up with a solution for this by now. I wrote a PHP class to display a recordset as an HTML table/datagrid, and I wish to expand it so that we can sort the datagrid by whichever column the user selects. In the below example data, we may need to sort the recordset array by Name, Shirt, Assign, or Age fields. I will take care of the display part, I just need help with sorting the data array. As usual, I query a database to get a result, iterate throught he result, and put the records into an assciateiave array. So, we end up with an array of arrays. (See below.) I need to be able to sort by any column in the dataset. However, I will not know the column names at design time, nor will I know if the colums will be string or numeric values. I have seen a ton of solutions to this, but I have not seen a GOOD and GENERIC solution Can somebody please suggest a way that I can sort the recordset array that is GENERIC, and will work on any recordset? Again, I will not know the fields names or datatypes at design time. The array presented below is ONLY an example. Array ( [0] = Array ( [name] = Kirk [shrit] = Gold [assign] = Bridge ) [1] => Array ( [name] => Spock [shrit] => Blue [assign] => Bridge ) [2] => Array ( [name] => Uhura [shrit] => Red [assign] => Bridge ) [3] => Array ( [name] => Scotty [shrit] => Red [assign] => Engineering ) [4] => Array ( [name] => McCoy [shrit] => Blue [assign] => Sick Bay ) )

  Read the article

• Adding an Array inside an array in a PHP function

  - by bateman_ap

  I have created a function in PHP that calls a webservice and parses through the result, assinging values to variables and returning them all as an Array. This all works perfectly, however I have come across a need to have an "array within my array" I am assigning values as below: $productName = $product->Name; $productID = $product->ID; $productArray = array( 'productName' => "$productName", 'productID' => "$productID" ); return $productArray; However I now have a piece of data that comes back with multiple results so I need to have a additional array to store these, I am getting the values from the returned XML using a foreach loop, however I want to be able to add them to the array with a name so I can reference them in the returned data, this is where I have a problem... $bestForLists = $product->BestFors; foreach( $bestForLists as $bestForList ) { $productBestFors = $bestForList->BestFor; foreach( $productBestFors as $productBestFor ) { $productBestForName = $productBestFor->Name; $productBestForID = $productBestFor->ID; } } I tried creating an array for these using the below code: $bestForArray[] = (array( "productBestForID" => "$productBestForID", "productBestForName" => "$productBestForName" )); And then at the end merging these together: $productArray= array_merge($productArray,$bestForArray); If I print out the returned value I get: Array ( [productName] => Test Product [productID] => 14128 [0] => Array ( [productBestForID] => 56647 [productBestForName] => Lighting ) [1] => Array ( [productBestForID] => 56648 [productBestForName] => Sound ) ) I would like to give the internal Array a name so I can reference it in my code, or is there a better way of doing this, at the moment I am using the following in my PHP page to get values: $productName = $functionReturnedValues['productName']; I would like to use the following to access the array I could then loop through: $bestForArray = $functionReturnedValues['bestForArray']; Hope someone can help

  Read the article

• How to combine these two PHP arrays ?

  - by Annan

  I have two arrays in php that are part of an image management system. weighted_images A multidimensional array. Each sub array is an associative array with keys of 'weight' (for ordering by) and 'id' (the id of the image). array( 156 => array('weight'=>1, 'id'=>156), 784 => array('weight'=>-2, 'id'=>784), ) images This array is user input. It's an array of image ids. array(784, 346, 748) I want to combine them in to a single array of ids ordered by the weight of the image. If an image doesn't have a weight append to the end. It's not a particularly hard problem however my solution is far from elegant and can't help thinking that there must be a better way to do this. $t_images = array(); foreach ($weighted_images as $wi) { if ( in_array($wi['id'], $images) ) { $t_images[$wi['weight']] = $wi['id']; } } foreach ($images as $image) { if ( !$weighted_images[$image] ) { $t_images[] = $image; } } $images = $t_images; Question: Is there a better way to do this?

  Read the article

• How to sort a multidimensional array by a certain key?

  - by Eelke

  This should be really simple, but what is the way to go on this. I want to sort an multidimensional array by a key, like this: Array ( [0] => Array ( [iid] => 1 [invitee] => 174 [nid] => 324343 [showtime] => 2010-05-09 15:15:00 [location] => 13 [status] => 1 [created] => 2010-05-09 15:05:00 [updated] => 2010-05-09 16:24:00 ) [1] => Array ( [iid] => 1 [invitee] => 220 [nid] => 21232 [showtime] => 2010-05-09 15:15:00 [location] => 12 [status] => 0 [created] => 2010-05-10 18:11:00 [updated] => 2010-05-10 18:11:00 )) Say i want to sort this by [status], how would I achieve this? Thanks in advance!

  Read the article

• All possibilities in 2d array

  - by valli-R

  I have this array: $array = array ( array('1', '2', '3'), array('!', '@'), array('a', 'b', 'c', 'd'), ); And I want to know all character combination of sub arrays.. for example : 1!a 1!b 1!c 1!d 1@a 1@b 1@c 1@d 2!a 2!b 2!c 2!d 2@a 2@b ... Currently I am having this code : for($i = 0; $i < count($array[0]); $i++) { for($j = 0; $j < count($array[1]); $j++) { for($k = 0; $k < count($array[2]); $k++) { echo $array[0][$i].$array[1][$j].$array[2][$k].'<br/>'; } } } It works, but I think it is ugly, and when I am adding more arrays, I have to add more for. I am pretty sure there is a way to do this recursively, but I don't know how to start/how to do it. A little help could be nice! Thanks you!

  Read the article

• Handling close-to-impossible collisions on should-be-unique values

  - by balpha

  There are many systems that depend on the uniqueness of some particular value. Anything that uses GUIDs comes to mind (eg. the Windows registry or other databases), but also things that create a hash from an object to identify it and thus need this hash to be unique. A hash table usually doesn't mind if two objects have the same hash because the hashing is just used to break down the objects into categories, so that on lookup, not all objects in the table, but only those objects in the same category (bucket) have to be compared for identity to the searched object. Other implementations however (seem to) depend on the uniqueness. My example (that's what lead me to asking this) is Mercurial's revision IDs. An entry on the Mercurial mailing list correctly states The odds of the changeset hash colliding by accident in your first billion commits is basically zero. But we will notice if it happens. And you'll get to be famous as the guy who broke SHA1 by accident. But even the tiniest probability doesn't mean impossible. Now, I don't want an explanation of why it's totally okay to rely on the uniqueness (this has been discussed here for example). This is very clear to me. Rather, I'd like to know (maybe by means of examples from your own work): Are there any best practices as to covering these improbable cases anyway? Should they be ignored, because it's more likely that particularly strong solar winds lead to faulty hard disk reads? Should they at least be tested for, if only to fail with a "I give up, you have done the impossible" message to the user? Or should even these cases get handled gracefully? For me, especially the following are interesting, although they are somewhat touchy-feely: If you don't handle these cases, what do you do against gut feelings that don't listen to probabilities? If you do handle them, how do you justify this work (to yourself and others), considering there are more probable cases you don't handle, like a supernonva?

  Read the article

• Anyone Know a Great Sparse One Dimensional Array Library in Python?

  - by TheJacobTaylor

  I am working on an algorithm in Python that uses arrays heavily. The arrays are typically sparse and are read from and written to constantly. I am currently using relatively large native arrays and the performance is good but the memory usage is high (as expected). I would like to be able to have the array implementation not waste space for values that are not used and allow an index offset other than zero. As an example, if my numbers start at 1,000,000 I would like to be able to index my array starting at 1,000,000 and not be required to waste memory with a million unused values. Array reads and writes needs to be fast. Expanding into new territory can be a small delay but reads and writes should be O(1) if possible. Does anybody know of a library that can do it? Thanks!

  Read the article

• XSL unique values per node

  - by Nathan

  ok i have this xml <roots> <root> <name>first</name> <item type='test'><something>A</something></item> <item type='test'><something>B</something></item> <item type='test'><something>C</something></item> <item type='test'><something>A</something></item> <item type='other'><something>A</something></item> <item type='test'><something>B</something></item> <item type='other'><something>D</something></item> </root> <root> <name>second</name> <item type='test'><something>E</something></item> <item type='test'><something>B</something></item> <item type='test'><something>F</something></item> <item type='test'><something>A</something></item> <item type='other'><something>A</something></item> <item type='test'><something>B</something></item> <item type='other'><something>D</something></item> </root> </roots> now i need to get the unique values of each root node so far i have <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?> <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"> <xsl:output indent="yes" method="text"/> <xsl:key name="item-by-value" match="something" use="."/> <xsl:key name="rootkey" match="root" use="name"/> <xsl:template match="/"> <xsl:for-each select="key('rootkey','second')"> <xsl:for-each select="item/something"> <xsl:if test="generate-id() = generate-id(key('item-by-value', normalize-space(.)))"> <xsl:value-of select="."/> </xsl:if> </xsl:for-each> </xsl:for-each> </xsl:template> </xsl:stylesheet> if i use "First" as the key to get only the first root i get a good result ABCD how ever if i use "second" i only get EF but i need the result to be ABDFE

  Read the article

• How to add values in multidimensional array?

  - by vaiji

  I have a array like the bellow. Array ( [1] => Array ( [TotalPosts] => 46 [AgentSchemeNumber] => 11 [AgentName] => Vaiji ) [2] => Array ( [TotalPosts] => 3 [AgentSchemeNumber] => 22 [AgentName] => Vaiji ) [3] => Array ( [TotalPosts] => 0 [AgentSchemeNumber] => 33 [AgentName] => Vicky ) [4] => Array ( [TotalPosts] => 0 [AgentSchemeNumber] => 44 [AgentName] => Raja ) [5] => Array ( [TotalPosts] => 18 [AgentSchemeNumber] => 55 [AgentName] => Rama ) [6] => Array ( [TotalPosts] => 13 [AgentSchemeNumber] => 66 [AgentName] => Udaya ) ) Here AgentName vaiji contain 2 records. I want a output like Array ( [1] => Array ( [TotalPosts] => 49 [AgentSchemeNumber] => 11 or 22 (any number) [AgentName] => Vaiji ) [2] => Array ( [TotalPosts] => 0 [AgentSchemeNumber] => 33 [AgentName] => Vicky ) [3] => Array ( [TotalPosts] => 0 [AgentSchemeNumber] => 44 [AgentName] => Raja ) [4] => Array ( [TotalPosts] => 18 [AgentSchemeNumber] => 55 [AgentName] => Rama ) [5] => Array ( [TotalPosts] => 13 [AgentSchemeNumber] => 66 [AgentName] => Udaya ) ) Please help me how to do it?

  Read the article

• "Simple" sort a nested array using array_multisort or native PHP functions instead of my own foreach loop

  - by Ana Ban

  I have the following array of days of the week, with each day having hours of the day (the whole array represents the schedule of a part-time employee): Array ( [7] => Array ( [0] => 15 [1] => 14 [2] => 13 [3] => 11 [4] => 12 [5] => 10 ) [1] => Array ( [0] => 10 [1] => 13 [2] => 12 ) [6] => Array ( [0] => 14 ) [3] => Array ( [0] => 4 [1] => 5 [2] => 6 ) ) and I simply need to: sort asc each sub-array (2nd dimension) - no need to maintain the numeric keys, values are integers sort asc the 1st dimension and maintain the numeric, integer keys ie: Array ( [1] => Array ( [0] => 10 [1] => 12 [2] => 13 ) [3] => Array ( [0] => 4 [1] => 5 [2] => 6 ) [6] => Array ( [0] => 14 ) [7] => Array ( [0] => 10 [1] => 11 [2] => 12 [3] => 13 [4] => 14 [5] => 15 ) ) Additional info: only the keys of the 1st dimension and the values of the 2nd dimension (and of course their association) are meaningful to my use-case the 1st dimension can have at most 7 values, ranging from 1-7 (days of the week), and will have at least 1 value (1 day) the 2nd dimension can have at most 24 values, ranging from 0-23 (hours of each day), and will have at least 1 value (1 hour per day) I know I can do this with a foreach on the whole ksorted array and sort each 2nd dimension array: ksort($sched); foreach ($sched as &$array) sort($array); unset($array); but I was hoping I could achieve this with native php array function(s) instead. My search led me to try array_multisort(array_values($array), array_keys($array), $array) but I just can't make it work.

  Read the article

• Remove values from array on foreach PHP

  - by user104531

  I have an array like this: Array ( [0] => Array ( [id] => 68 [type] => onetype [type_id] => 131 [name] => name1 ) [1] => Array ( [id] => 32 [type] => anothertype [type_id] => 101 [name] => name2 ) ) I need to remove some arrays from it if the users has permissions or not to see that kind of type. I am thinking on doing it with a for each, and do the needed ifs inside it to remove or let it as it. My question is: What's the most efficent way to do this? The array will have no more than 100 records. But several users will request it and do the filtering over and over.

  Read the article

• A Simple PHP Array Manipulation

  - by Ygam

  Hi guys! how would you turn this array: array( 0 => Title1, 1 => Title2, 3 => Address1, 4 => Address2, ) to this array: array ( 0 => array( 'title' => 'Title1' 'address' =>'Address1' ), 1 => array( 'title' => 'Title2', 'address' => 'Address2' ) ); when you were initially given $_POST['title'] = array('Title1', 'Title2); $_POST['address'] = array('Address1', 'Address2'); which when merged would give you the first array I have given I was able to solve this via a high level Arr:Rotate function in Kohana framework, along with Arr::merge function but I can't quite understand the implementation. Please help

  Read the article

• Ruby - Subclassing array to make it randomize when flattened

  - by Markus O'Reilly

  I'm trying to subclass Array in ruby to make it randomize its elements when flatten! is called. Looking at the source code for Array#flatten (http://ruby-doc.org/core/classes/Array.src/M002218.html), it looks like it should recursively call flatten! on any array contained within an array. So, I tried doing something like this: class RandArray < Array def randomize! self.sort!{rand(3)-1} end def flatten! randomize! super end end However, when a normal array contains my RandArray and flatten is called on the normal array, flatten! is never called in my array. I figure ruby is just calling some other method to flatten the arrays recursively, but I can't figure out what that is. Any tips?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  | Next Page >