Search Results

Search found 814 results on 33 pages for 'balancing'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 8/33 | < Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  | Next Page >

  • Redundant Router and Load Balancing vs. DDoS attack

    - by colgatta
    With a small server farm at a hoster with great support and conditions, I worry about the increasing number of DDoS attacks against this hoster (not my web project, but other clients on the same location). I have booked a redundant router and load balancer as managed service with this hoster to share the load with all the dedicated servers. However, I was lost again today because another one's project was attacked with DDoS for hours :-( Each hour means hundreds of dollars loss whenever my adserver and tracking is not reachable. Even time-out advertising have to be paid by me but can not be resold to my clients without the servers being available. All the time, the servers, the load and traffic is OK and health, but no chance to keep this stable/online if the hoster is vulnerable. Anyone has ideas or suggestions how to protect - even against DDoS?

    Read the article

  • load balancing in Tomcat

    - by Alvin
    Hi All, I want to implement the load balancing in tomcat 6.0 so that we can create more than one instance of a tomcat and when any of the instance is down then other instance will run our application. so that our application will never be down even when the large number of concurrent request comes. But i have no idea to implement it. Please give your precious suggestions.

    Read the article

  • What's wrong with this vcl config for varnish-cache as load balancer?

    - by dabito
    I have the current configurations active on my default.vcl varnish file on the machine that balances the load for other two machines (the other two machines also have varnish active). My intention is to have this server do only the load balancing and the other machines do the processing and also their own caching. My problem is that even with the config testing (not even a stress test or anything, just a few requests a minute) I get the guru meditation error and have to restart varnish. This is the default.vcl for the load balancing server: backend vader { .host = "app1.server.com"; .probe = { .url = "/"; .interval = 10s; .timeout = 4s; .window = 5; .threshold = 3; } } backend malgus { .host = "app2.server.com"; .probe = { .url = "/"; .interval = 10s; .timeout = 4s; .window = 5; .threshold = 3; } } director dooku round-robin { { .backend = vader; } { .backend = malgus; } } sub vcl_recv { if (req.http.host ~ "^balancer.server.com$") { set req.backend = dooku; } } Am I doing something wrong or missing something? EDIT: This is varnishlog's output: 0 CLI - Rd ping 0 CLI - Wr 200 19 PONG 1345839995 1.0 0 CLI - Rd ping 0 CLI - Wr 200 19 PONG 1345839998 1.0 0 CLI - Rd ping 0 CLI - Wr 200 19 PONG 1345840001 1.0 0 Backend_health - malgus Still sick 4--X--- 0 3 5 0.000000 3.846876 0 Backend_health - vader Still sick 4--X--- 0 3 5 0.000000 3.839194 0 CLI - Rd ping 0 CLI - Wr 200 19 PONG 1345840004 1.0 14 SessionOpen c 10.150.7.151 38272 :80 14 ReqStart c 10.150.7.151 38272 458200540 14 RxRequest c GET 14 RxURL c / 14 RxProtocol c HTTP/1.1 14 RxHeader c Host: dooku-dev.excelsior.com 14 RxHeader c Connection: keep-alive 14 RxHeader c User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/536.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/20.0.1132.47 Safari/536.11 14 RxHeader c Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8 14 RxHeader c Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate,sdch 14 RxHeader c Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.8,es-419;q=0.6,es;q=0.4 14 RxHeader c Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3 14 RxHeader c Cookie: SESSa87d6c6da0c61037a9169122dc5e4a19=HR_0Srhgc-uDArT3aJFzOBy31FtzneTXg38byr1eGMU; __atuvc=4%7C33 14 VCL_call c recv pass 14 VCL_call c hash 14 Hash c / 14 Hash c dooku-dev.excelsior.com 14 VCL_return c hash 14 VCL_call c pass pass 14 FetchError c no backend connection 14 VCL_call c error deliver 14 VCL_call c deliver deliver 14 TxProtocol c HTTP/1.1 14 TxStatus c 503 14 TxResponse c Service Unavailable 14 TxHeader c Server: Varnish 14 TxHeader c Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 14 TxHeader c Retry-After: 5 14 TxHeader c Content-Length: 418 14 TxHeader c Accept-Ranges: bytes 14 TxHeader c Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 20:26:44 GMT 14 TxHeader c X-Varnish: 458200540 14 TxHeader c Age: 0 14 TxHeader c Via: 1.1 varnish 14 TxHeader c Connection: close 14 Length c 418 14 ReqEnd c 458200540 1345840004.916415691 1345840004.965190172 0.020933390 0.048741817 0.000032663 14 SessionClose c error 14 StatSess c 10.150.7.151 38272 0 1 1 0 1 0 256 418 14 SessionOpen c 10.150.7.151 38273 :80 14 ReqStart c 10.150.7.151 38273 458200541 14 RxRequest c GET 14 RxURL c /favicon.ico 14 RxProtocol c HTTP/1.1 14 RxHeader c Host: dooku-dev.excelsior.com 14 RxHeader c Connection: keep-alive 14 RxHeader c Accept: */* 14 RxHeader c User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/536.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/20.0.1132.47 Safari/536.11 14 RxHeader c Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate,sdch 14 RxHeader c Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.8,es-419;q=0.6,es;q=0.4 14 RxHeader c Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3 14 RxHeader c Cookie: SESSa87d6c6da0c61037a9169122dc5e4a19=HR_0Srhgc-uDArT3aJFzOBy31FtzneTXg38byr1eGMU; __atuvc=4%7C33 14 VCL_call c recv pass 14 VCL_call c hash 14 Hash c /favicon.ico 14 Hash c dooku-dev.excelsior.com 14 VCL_return c hash 14 VCL_call c pass pass 14 FetchError c no backend connection 14 VCL_call c error deliver 14 VCL_call c deliver deliver 14 TxProtocol c HTTP/1.1 14 TxStatus c 503 14 TxResponse c Service Unavailable 14 TxHeader c Server: Varnish 14 TxHeader c Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 14 TxHeader c Retry-After: 5 14 TxHeader c Content-Length: 418 14 TxHeader c Accept-Ranges: bytes 14 TxHeader c Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 20:26:45 GMT 14 TxHeader c X-Varnish: 458200541 14 TxHeader c Age: 0 14 TxHeader c Via: 1.1 varnish 14 TxHeader c Connection: close 14 Length c 418 14 ReqEnd c 458200541 1345840005.226389885 1345840005.226457834 0.000026941 0.000043154 0.000024796 14 SessionClose c error 14 StatSess c 10.150.7.151 38273 0 1 1 0 1 0 256 418

    Read the article

  • LVS TCP connection timeouts - lingering connections

    - by Jon Topper
    I'm using keepalived to load-balance connections between a number of TCP servers. I don't expect it matters, but the service in this case is rabbitmq. I'm using NAT type balancing with weighted round-robin. A client connects to the server thus: [client]-----------[lvs]------------[real server] a b If a client connects to the LVS and remains idle, sending nothing on the socket, this eventually times out, according to timeouts set using ipvsadm --set. At this point, the connection marked 'a' above correctly disappears from the output of netstat -anp on the client, and from the output of ipvsadm -L -n -c on the lvs box. Connection 'b', however, remains ESTABLISHED according to netstat -anp on the real server box. Why is this? Can I force lvs to properly reset the connection to the real server?

    Read the article

  • Fortigate - Accessing a Virtual Server address from several interfaces

    - by Jeremy G
    I am setting up a new application in its own DMZ on our Fortigate 300C firewalls. I have defined a load-balancing configuration for part of the application, and this works fine for traffic coming in from our internal network. However, I would also like this application to be reachable from other DMZs, for inter-application traffic, and from the SSL VPN interface. I can't seem to define the required policy, and it seems this is due to Virtual Servers being bound to the client interface on the Fortigate rather than the server interface (and so my virtual IP is not accessible from any of these other interfaces) Does anyone have an idea how I might go about this ? I guess I could create other virtual IPs for each interface, but this gets complicated to handle as clients need to change the address they use depending on how they are connecting. Thanks, Jeremy G

    Read the article

  • scalability with nginx, passenger, ruby on rails setup

    - by Dani Cela
    Hey guys I had a question regarding scalability for my RoR application. We have been optimizing our application over the last few days and after running blitz.io, notice that our application times out after maybe 1000 hits in 30 seconds we experienced massive timeouts. In the 1 minute test apparently 74% of users would have timed out. Look at the performance of my website: http://blitz.io/report/1c8eb2f395a5eadeabd62fd831ada9e5 Not saying that our website will in any way experience this now, but I wish to design the infrastructure to handle this. What is normally done in this situation? Currently we have one web server and one database server. Would load balancing be the route to go?

    Read the article

  • loadbalancing with difference nginx location context and backend server context

    - by robinmag
    Hi, I used nginx and upstream module for load balancing with the following config upstream lb { server 127.0.0.1:8080; server 127.0.0.1:8081; } server { listen 88; server_name localhost; location /cas/ { proxy_pass http://lb; proxy_redirect off; proxy_connect_timeout 2; proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for; } } the problem is the "location /context/" have to match to the context of backend server so when i request localhost/context/index.html then nginx routes it to 127.0.0.1:8080/context/index.html or 127.0.0.1:8080/context/index.html. Is it possible to have difference backend context and nginx location for example with "location /" nginx will routes the request to 127.0.0.1:8080/context/index.html or 127.0.0.1:8080/context/index.html Thank you.

    Read the article

  • loadbalancing with difference nginx location context and backend context

    - by robinmag
    Hi, I used nginx and upstream module for load balancing with the following config upstream lb { server 127.0.0.1:8080; server 127.0.0.1:8081; } server { listen 88; server_name localhost; location /cas/ { proxy_pass http://lb; proxy_redirect off; proxy_connect_timeout 2; proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for; } } the problem is the "location /context/" have to match to the context of backend server so when i request localhost/context/index.html then nginx routes it to 127.0.0.1:8080/context/index.html or 127.0.0.1:8080/context/index.html. Is it possible to have difference backend context and nginx location for example with "location /" nginx will routes the request to 127.0.0.1:8080/context/index.html or 127.0.0.1:8080/context/index.html Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Best Linux distro for load-balancers?

    - by Vimvq1987
    I wanted to try HAProxy/Linux Virtual Server like front-end load-balancers, but as far I know, they're Linux-based software. I don't have any experiences with Linux yet. so there're quite many questions to ask: What is the best Linux distro(s) for load-balancing? I plan to use VirtualPC to run some virtual machines. How much RAM is the best for each machine run that distro? I want to simulate a load-balancer with can handle about 100 hits/second, is it possible? Thank you very much!

    Read the article

  • Good Books About Scaling Up Databases/Servers/etc.?

    - by Mehrdad
    I've applied for an internship at a startup company that expects its user base to grow by a large factor in a small amount of time, and so part of their project is to scale everything up so that they're ready: handling more/larger requests efficiently, handling server failures, load balancing, getting more JavaScript to run faster on the client computers, etc. Part of my job will also be figuring out what to do, so it's not obvious what my exact task will be at the moment. I was told that I should start reading up a little more about this so that I would have a little bit of an idea of what to do. What are some good books for me to read on this topic? I have a little bit of experience with the usage of MySQL (and also a little experience with web development), but in no way do I claim any knowledge on the internal workings of databases or distributed systems, so I might need readings more on the introductory side.

    Read the article

  • Loadbalance UDP traffic with session affinity and way to take servers in & out of rotation

    - by William
    What is the best way to go about load balancing UDP traffic among a whole bunch of servers, while keeping session affinity based on the users' IP? I need to also be able to take servers in and out of rotation for new clients, so when they join for the first time, they get put on a server in a list of available servers, and clients already connected would stay connected to their specific server. I have written the software to maintain a list, but I can't seem to find anything that would perform this functionality. If you need the context, this is to facilitate game tournaments for Minecraft: Pocket Edition, which is done with UDP traffic, I cannot change the protocol. And, because tournaments open and close, I need to be able to place players on their proper servers. Performance is also a priority, I have a program to do this but it is very bloated and slow. Thanks for any help! William

    Read the article

  • PEN daemon as load balancer, IIS web logs not showing true requester IPs

    - by Aszurom
    I have a Hercules vmware appliance, which is a micro-linux vm that runs the PEN daemon and acts as a server load-balancer. It takes any incoming request on the appliance's IP and routes it out to a number of alternate IPs. The logs of the daemon show the true IP of the browsers hitting the website. The logs of the websites themselves (iis 6 and 7) only show the requester IP as being that of the load balancer. The IT manager tells me that when we had a hardware appliance (serveriron XL) doing the load balancing, the web logs reflected the requester IPs accurately. Is there any way to get this resolved with the daemon, or will I be digging that out of the closet and plugging it back in?

    Read the article

  • LVS TCP connection timeouts - lingering connections

    - by Jon Topper
    I'm using keepalived to load-balance connections between a number of TCP servers. I don't expect it matters, but the service in this case is rabbitmq. I'm using NAT type balancing with weighted round-robin. A client connects to the server thus: [client]-----------[lvs]------------[real server] a b If a client connects to the LVS and remains idle, sending nothing on the socket, this eventually times out, according to timeouts set using ipvsadm --set. At this point, the connection marked 'a' above correctly disappears from the output of netstat -anp on the client, and from the output of ipvsadm -L -n -c on the lvs box. Connection 'b', however, remains ESTABLISHED according to netstat -anp on the real server box. Why is this? Can I force lvs to properly reset the connection to the real server?

    Read the article

  • How to optimize mysql databse for serving 1000s of requests at a time ?

    - by Bilal
    How to optimize mysql databse for serving 1000s of requests at a time ? for a site like: linksnappy.com Is it possible to configure 2 seperate mysql servers into one load balancing server? like if one of them is overloaded switch to the next one ? same question for the http requests handling server. Another question : what kind of server do I need to server 1000s of requests at a time ? (http server) you can see the kind of site Im talking about is a download site. the server just dies when we have too many download requests. we currently have intel xeon quad core 2.4ghz with 4gb of ram.

    Read the article

  • What do you use to loadbalance IPv6 services?

    - by Michael Renner
    Hi, the current Linux software environment for IPv6 load balancing looks a bit grim. IPVS has rudimentary support for IPv6 but it's far from complete. NAT for IPv6 seems to be a no-go. Are there any other projects which aim for this goal? Does the IPv6 support in other OS look better? Are there any commercial products which have been successfully used in production environments with non-trivial load patterns? Or is it just that the time for IPv6 hasn't come... yet? ;) best regards, Michael

    Read the article

  • Load Balancer recommendations

    - by delerious010
    I provide hosting service for about 250 clients to date, and this is increasing on a monthly basis. For each client, I have 2 "services" configured for L4 balancing / persistence .. one on port 80, another for port 443 which redirects to another internal port as well as 4 servers per service. This equates to a total of 500 "services" and 2000 "servers". I'm currently running with a couple CoyotePoint load balancers, and have had a look at some Barracudas but so far I'm really not impressed by those. Could anyone recommend some good load balancers which would be able to support this sort of load ? And which offer a good API, or shell access to automate management.

    Read the article

  • Internal+external interfaces with multiple default gateways on win2003

    - by fileitup
    Im trying to set up several web servers for a load balanced cluster and need to have each server connected to the internal network (for load balancing) as well as to an external network (internet - for administration). I have two NICs but since I cant set two default gateways I have the external gateway as default and the internal as a route rule. This setup only works half way - the internal network is fine but I cant log in from outside or see the web from the box. If I switch the gateways remote login/web will work, but the internal wont. Im sure someone encountered this before but wasnt able to find anything online. Any help will be appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Windows replacement for HAProxy

    - by GrayWizardx
    It does not appear that there is a similar question to this already posted, so I will go ahead and ask. I am working on a project that could benefit from having two - four servers handling incoming requests to a backend webservice. The service does not require SSL but does need to support occassional long running processes (upto 120 secs). This project does not at present have the funding to purchase a hardware load balancing solution. I have previously used HAProxy as a solution for this, and found it very simple and straightforward. Is there a similar product for windows (server 2003 or 2008) which provides similar configuration options and runs as a lightweight service? For reasons outside my control I cannot setup a Linux machine (physical or virtual) and so I am looking for behaviour that can be deployed on a windows machine. I can only find Perlbal which appears to fall into this category. So as not to keep this open indifenitely I will give credit to the only answer.

    Read the article

  • Remove server from loadbalancer [on hold]

    - by Cris
    Our datacenter is load balancing the traffic to our weblogic servers based on an application deployed on each server called probe.ear It is a simple java app which is accessed by the loadbalancer and if it accessible it will redirect traffic to this server as well. When we want to remove one node from the loadbalancer we just stop the probe app and new traffic is not redirected to it BUT I am asking myself what about the current requests? The responses for the current requests are executed (completed). I did not had time to test (will do that first thing when go back to work) but on theoretical level for me it make sense to do so unless the loadbalancer has some special settings. Does my reasoning make sense to you? Just to make it clear since it was reported the question is not clear. Is there a way to configure a load balancer in a way that from a specific moment will not redirect traffic to a certain server without reseting the current requests ?

    Read the article

  • Maximizing TCP connections on HAProxy load balancer

    - by imaginative
    I am currently using HAProxy in order to load balance tcp connections from clients to my Erlang app server. The connection is persistent, which means I'm limited to roughly 64K clients on an optimized server (I'm currently running HAProxy on an m1.large EC2 instance). My app server is designed to horizontally scale based on the number of TCP connections. What's worrying me though is I'll need an equal number of HAProxy servers as app servers since it's a 1:1 connection. Is there currently a way to "proxy" the tcp connection to the app server so that once HAProxy sends the client off to my Erlang server, it can free up the connection, ready to serve another client? Are there any papers, existing solutions out there I can read so that I only have to worry about the 64K limit on my app servers, and not on the load balancing servers themselves?

    Read the article

  • Using a AWS EC2 Server to host a busy website and I need to set up a loadbalancing

    - by Philip Isaacs
    My company has one EC2 server running on AWS with a MYSQL-DB and Apache on the same instance. This one instance hosts a website built on PHP Zend Framework. The site runs like crap when it starts to get busy with a lot of traffic so I'm looking for some advice on how to set up something that can handle the load better. My first question is should I move the mysql DB on to a separate EC2 instance or perhaps use AWS's RDS service which looks like a nice option. I'm sort of new to some of this but I'm guessing I'll need at least two EC2 instances for serving the website from and some sort of load balancing mechanism to distribute traffic. But maybe not, I'm not sure. Also what are some best practices for how to replicate the data so that they stay in sync on both instances? Okay I know these are a lot of questions. But I don't know where to start so any advice will help.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  | Next Page >