Search Results

Search found 12661 results on 507 pages for 'css inheritance'.

Page 8/507 | < Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  | Next Page >

  • Absolutely positioned element inside fixed positioned element

    - by Salman A
    Related to my previous question, I have a <div style="position: fixed;"> footer. The footer contains <a style="display: block; float: left;"> elements. Upon clicking one of these links I want a div to popup above that link. I am experimenting with a couple of CSS settings and got acceptable results but I am not sure if my CSS will work across browsers. I am wondering if some one can tell me a bullet proof and tested CSS solution to achieve something like this:

    Read the article

  • Weird CSS-behaviour [migrated]

    - by WMRKameleon
    <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <title>PakHet</title> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="css/basis.css" /> </head> <body> <div class="wrapper"> <div id='cssmenu'> <ul> <li class="active"><a href='index.html'><span>Start</span></a></li> <li><a href='pakhet.html'><span>Over PakHet</span></a></li> <li><a href='overons.html'><span>Over Ons</span></a></li> <li class='has-sub '><a href='#'><span>Uw pakket</span></a> <ul> <li><a href='aanmelden.php'><span>Aanmelden</span></a></li> <li><a href='traceren.php'><span>Traceren</span></a></li> </ul> </li> </ul> </div> <div class="header"> <h1>Hier komt de titel van de website</h1> </div> <div class="content"> <p>Dit is de tekst van de content. Dit is de indexpagina.</p> </div> </div> </body> </html> And this is the CSS: /* CSS RESET */ html, body, div, span, applet, object, iframe, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, p, blockquote, pre, a, abbr, acronym, address, big, cite, code, del, dfn, em, img, ins, kbd, q, s, samp, small, strike, strong, sub, sup, tt, var, b, u, i, center, dl, dt, dd, ol, ul, li, fieldset, form, label, legend, table, caption, tbody, tfoot, thead, tr, th, td, article, aside, canvas, details, embed, figure, figcaption, footer, header, hgroup, menu, nav, output, ruby, section, summary, time, mark, audio, video, *{ margin: 0; padding: 0; border: 0; vertical-align: baseline; } table { border-collapse: collapse; border-spacing: 0; } /* Einde CSS RESET, nu echte code */ html, body{ background:url(../images/bg_picture.jpg) fixed no-repeat; } .wrapper{ margin:0 auto; } .header{ margin:0 auto; background-color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.4); } .content{ background-color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.4); width:600px; margin:0 auto; margin-top:50px; } .content p{ color:white; text-shadow:1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0, 0.5); font-family:"Lucida Grande", sans-serif; } #cssmenu{ height:37px; display:block; padding:0; margin: 0; border:1px solid; } #cssmenu > ul {list-style:inside none; padding:0; margin:0;} #cssmenu > ul > li {list-style:inside none; padding:0; margin:0; float:left; display:block; position:relative;} #cssmenu > ul > li > a{ outline:none; display:block; position:relative; padding:12px 20px; font:bold 13px/100% "Lucida Grande", Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align:center; text-decoration:none; text-shadow:1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0, 0.4); } #cssmenu > ul > li:first-child > a{border-radius:5px 0 0 5px;} #cssmenu > ul > li > a:after{ content:''; position:absolute; border-right:1px solid; top:-1px; bottom:-1px; right:-2px; z-index:99; } #cssmenu ul li.has-sub:hover > a:after{top:0; bottom:0;} #cssmenu > ul > li.has-sub > a:before{ content:''; position:absolute; top:18px; right:6px; border:5px solid transparent; border-top:5px solid #fff; } #cssmenu > ul > li.has-sub:hover > a:before{top:19px;} #cssmenu ul li.has-sub:hover > a{ background:#3f3f3f; border-color:#3f3f3f; padding-bottom:13px; padding-top:13px; top:-1px; z-index:999; } #cssmenu ul li.has-sub:hover > ul, #cssmenu ul li.has-sub:hover > div{display:block;} #cssmenu ul li.has-sub > a:hover{background:#3f3f3f; border-color:#3f3f3f;} #cssmenu ul li > ul, #cssmenu ul li > div{ display:none; width:auto; position:absolute; top:38px; padding:10px 0; background:#3f3f3f; border-radius:0 0 5px 5px; z-index:999; } #cssmenu ul li > ul{width:200px;} #cssmenu ul li > ul li{display:block; list-style:inside none; padding:0; margin:0; position:relative;} #cssmenu ul li > ul li a{ outline:none; display:block; position:relative; margin:0; padding:8px 20px; font:10pt "Lucida Grande", Helvetica, sans-serif; color:#fff; text-decoration:none; text-shadow:1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0, 0.5); } #cssmenu, #cssmenu > ul > li > ul > li a:hover{ background:#333333; background:-moz-linear-gradient(top, #333333 0%, #222222 100%); background:-webkit-gradient(linear, left top, left bottom, color-stop(0%,#333333), color-stop(100%,#222222)); background:-webkit-linear-gradient(top, #333333 0%,#222222 100%); background:-o-linear-gradient(top, #333333 0%,#222222 100%); background:-ms-linear-gradient(top, #333333 0%,#222222 100%); background:linear-gradient(top, #333333 0%,#222222 100%); filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient( startColorstr='#333333', endColorstr='#222222',GradientType=0 ); } #cssmenu{border-color:#000;} #cssmenu > ul > li > a{border-right:1px solid #000; color:#fff;} #cssmenu > ul > li > a:after{border-color:#444;} #cssmenu > ul > li > a:hover{background:#111;} #cssmenu > ul > li.active > a{ color:orange; } .header{ clear:both; } The problem is that, whenever I hover on the dropdown-menu, that a 1px margin appears in between the menu and the header. Can I solve that? I can't seem to find the solution.

    Read the article

  • CSS not working in ASP.NET

    - by Tux
    Hi, I have created a simple page in HTML which works fine. But when I import that to ASP.NET, the page design clutters up. Here is my Site.Master <%@ Master Language="C#" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeBehind="Site.master.cs" Inherits="Elite.WUI.Site" %> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" > <head runat="server"> <title></title> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="styles.css" /> </head> <body> <form id="form1" runat="server"> <asp:ContentPlaceHolder ID="headerCPH" runat="server"> <div id="header"> <h1>WUI</h1> </div> <hr /> </asp:ContentPlaceHolder> <asp:ContentPlaceHolder ID="navigationCPH" runat="server"> <div id="navigation"> <ul> <li>Home</li> <li>Users</li> <li>Campaigns</li> <li>Settings</li> </ul> </div> </asp:ContentPlaceHolder> <asp:ContentPlaceHolder ID="contentCPH" runat="server"> </asp:ContentPlaceHolder> </form> </body> </html> my stylesheet styles.css #navigation { float: left; border: 1pt solid; } #navigation ul { list-style-type: none; padding: 5 5 5 5; margin: 0; } #content { margin-left: 9%; border: 1pt solid; padding-left: 5; } and the actual page derived from master page <%@ Page Title="" Language="C#" MasterPageFile="~/Site.Master" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeBehind="ABC.aspx.cs" Inherits="Elite.WUI.ABC" %> <asp:Content ID="Content3" ContentPlaceHolderID="contentCPH" runat="server"> <div id="content"> <p>Test content</p> </div> </asp:Content> Here is how it is displayed in Firefox (ver 3.6) As you can see that the border, list-style-type properties are working but margin isn't working. Can anyone tell me what am I doing wrong? I have tested it in Google Chrome but same issue. While the HTML and CSS works fine when there is no ASP.NET i.e. simple .html file.

    Read the article

  • Fixed JavaScript Warning - Pin to Top of Page Using CSS Position [migrated]

    - by nicorellius
    I am new to this site, but it seems like the right place to ask this question. I am working on a noscript chunk of code whereby I do some stuff that includes a <p> at the top of the page that alerts the users that he/she has JavaScript disabled. The end result should look like the Stack Exchange sites when JavaScript is disabled (here is a screenshot of mine - SE looks similar except it is at the very top of the page): I have it working OK, but I would love it if the red bar stayed fixed along the top, upon scrolling. I tried using the position: fixed; method, but it ends up moving the p element and I can't get it to look exactly the same as it does without the position: fixed; modification. I tried fiddling with CSS top and left and other positioning but it doesn't ever look like I want it to. Here is a CSS snippett: <noscript> <style type="text/css"> p. noscript_warning { position: fixed; } </noscript>

    Read the article

  • CSS help positioning divs inline

    - by JaPerk14
    I need help with a recurring problem that happens a lot. I want to create a header that consists of 3 sections which are positioned inline. I display them inline using the following css code: display: inline & float: leftThe problem is that when I resize my browser window the last div is pushed down and isn't displayed inline. I know it sounds like I'm being picky, but I don't want the design to distort as the visitor change's the monitor screen. I have provided the html and css code below that I am working with below. Hopefully I have explained this well enough. Thanks in advance. HTML <div class="masthead-wrapper"> &nbsp; </div> <div class="searchbar-wrapper"> &nbsp; </div> <div class="profile-menu-wrapper"> &nbsp; </div> CSS #Header { display: block; width: 100%; height: 80px; background: #C0C0C0; } .masthead-wrapper { display: inline; float: left; width: 200px; height: 80px; background: #3b5998; } .searchbar-wrapper { display: inline; float: left; width: 560px; height: 80px; background: #FF0000; } .profile-menu-wrapper { display: inline; float: left; width: 200px; height: 80px; background: #00FF00; }

    Read the article

  • CSS-Specifity and CSS Inheritance (concrete question)?

    - by jens
    Hello, i would by thankful for an official link (and section) of the specification for CSS, that explains if: .one two h1 {color:green;font-family:arial;} /*case 1 */ .one two h1 {color:blue;} /*case 2*/ will result in (when evaluated by the browser) .one two h1 {color:blue;font-family:arial;} /*case 3*/ or will it be: .one two h1 {color:blue;} /*case 4*/ ==I have read a lot about inheritance, specifity, cascading etc but I still have not found for the given example which rules apply here. In regard to specifity both elements are equal in specifity the case2 will be the most specify one (as it is equal specific but the last one). But does specifity always apply to the whole selector with ALL properties defined. Or only the the properties that are are in "competition" (and declared in both). thanks!!!!

    Read the article

  • CSS Equivalent of Table Rowspan with Fluid Height

    - by Gabe
    I'm trying to accomplish the following using CSS: <table border="1" width="300px"> <tr> <td rowspan="2">This row should equal the height (no fixed-height allowed) of the 2 rows sitting to the right.</td> <td>Here is some sample text. And some additional sample text.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Here is some sample text. And some additional sample text.</td> </tr> </table> The examples I've seen for accomplishing this utilize fixed heights or allow the content to wrap around the left column. Is there an elegant way to accomplish this using CSS?

    Read the article

  • CSS/HTML: How to simulate IFRAME with CSS?

    - by BBnight
    I want to have a header DIV and a footer DIV always displayed on my web page, regardless of when you scroll down the page. How do I accomplish this using only CSS (without IFRAMES) For example: <div id=header>Always display on top, regardless if you have scrolled down the page</div> <div id=main_content>...</div> <div id=footer>Always display on the bottom</div>

    Read the article

  • CSS - margin and float property

    - by David Casillas
    1.- We have a div with static positioning. Inside we have a parragraph with a margin. The heigth of the div will be the parragraph without the margin 2.- We have a div with float:left. Inside we have a parragraph with a margin. The heigth of the div will be the parragraph plus its margin. What is the explanation of this? Here is the html code and the CSS code. And here is a link to the test site. http://prueba.davidcasillas.es/ <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="es"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /> <title>Untitled Document</title> <link href="index.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /> </head> <body> <div id="nivel1"> <div id="nivel21"> <p>Este es el primer parrafo</p> </div> <div id="nivel22"> <p>Este es el primer parrafo</p> </div> </div> </body> </html> body { margin:0; padding:0; } #nivel1 { border:solid; border-color:#333; margin:0; background-color:#0F3; margin:2em; } #nivel21 { margin:2em; float:left; background-color:#C00; } #nivel22 { margin:2em; background-color:#FC0; }

    Read the article

  • What is wrong with this CSS?

    - by Christopher
    I have the following CSS code: .yellow { background-image: url('/images/yellowlight.png'); background-repeat: no-repeat; height:100%; width:100%; } and the following HTML code: <div class="yellow">&nbsp;</div> However, the div on the page does not have the image. You can see this by clicking on the blue "Logs Status" button (in the tab box) at http://cl58logs.co.cc/. What's wrong with the CSS?

    Read the article

  • The subscription model behind CSS selectors?

    - by Martin Kristiansen
    With CSS selectors a query string body > h1.span subscribes to a specific type of nodes in the tree. Does anyone know how this is done? Selectors for transformations, how does the browser select the result set? And is there a trick to making it efficient? I imagine there being some sort of hierarchical type-tree for the entire structure to which the nodes subscribe and which is what is used when doing the selector queries — but this is only a guess. Does anyone know the real answer? Or even more interesting, what would be the best way to do dynamic lookups on a tree based on jQuery/CSS search queries?

    Read the article

  • CSS Attribute Content Selector multiple declarations

    - by Dave
    I have this in my CSS: div#headwrap ul li a[href*="dev"] {background: #034769}; div#headwrap ul li a[href*="music"] {background: #A61300}; div#headwrap ul li a[href*="opinion"] {background: #b2d81e}; div#headwrap ul li a[href*="work"] {background: #ffc340}; So, my expected behavior is that where a link (a) within a list item (li) inside a unordered list (ul) inside a div with id "headwrap" has an href that contains "dev", the link will have a background color of #034769. If the link has an href that contains "music" it will have a background color of #A61300, and so on. However, what I am seeing is that the rule is only correctly applied to "dev". If I reorder the CSS declarations (putting music first, for instance), it only gets applied to "music". I'm testing in Firefox and Chrome, both are doing the same thing. Only the first one is applied. Anyone have any ideas why?

    Read the article

  • CSS Child selectors in IE7 tables

    - by John
    I'm trying to use the CSS child selector in IE7, and it doesn't seem to work. I have nested tables. My outer table has a class name "mytable", and I want the td's of the outer table to show borders. I don't want the inner table td's to have borders. I think I should be able to have CSS that looks like this: .mytable { border-style: solid } .mytable>tr>td { border-style: solid } But the second line seems to have no effect. If I change the second line to make it less specific, it applies to all the td's - I see too many borders. td { border-style: solid } So I think it really is just an issue with the selectors. Pages like this suggest that IE7 should be able to do what I want. Am I doing something silly? Here's the whole HTML file: <html> <head> <style type="text/css"> .mytable { border-style: solid; border-collapse: collapse;} td { border-style: solid; } </style> </head> <body> <table class="mytable"> <tr> <td>Outer top-left</td> <td>Outer top-right</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Outer bottom-left</td> <td> <table> <tr> <td>Inner top-left</td> <td>Inner top-right</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Inner bottom-left</td> <td>Inner bottom-right</td> </tr> <table> </td> </tr> <table> </body> </html>

    Read the article

  • HTML/CSS layout question

    - by TheDelChop
    Guys, I just need a little help with some CSS layout if you don't mind. I've got three things I'm trying to play around with and I need some help making this work the way I was hoping. I've got the element of a page, which I'd like to be 100% of the browser window, obviously. Then I've got two elements which I'd like to stack on top of each other, but the trick is this, I'd like the bottom div, (a menu which should really be a fixed height) to determine the height of the top div. Is there a way to lay this out in CSS?

    Read the article

  • Reference app relative virtual paths in .css file

    - by bravo9
    Assume I have an "images" folder directory under the root of my application. How can I, from within a .css file, reference an image in this directory using an ASP.NET app relative path. Example: When in development, the path of ~/Images/Test.gif might resolve to /MyApp/Images/Test.gif while, in production, it might resolve to /Images/Test.gif (depending on the virtual directory for the application). I, obviously, want to avoid having to modify the .css file between environments. I know you can use Page.ResolveClientUrl to inject a url into a control's Style collection dynamically at render time. I would like to avoid doing this.

    Read the article

  • offsetWidth or CSS expression problem for IE6

    - by Bipul
    I need to set the width of textboxes as 80% of it's parent. So first I used td input[type="text"] { width: 80%; } But it was not rendering properly if the input is the child of td. So, I used Css expressions td input[type="text"] { width: expression(this.parentNode.offsetWidth*0.8); } It is working as I wanted in every browser except IE 6. Can anybody help me, where I am going wrong? I know that expressions are allowed in IE 6. So, is it the problem of using css expression or something to do offsetWidth. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Putting Images Inside a BUTTON Element (HTML & CSS)

    - by Jimbo
    I have a simple button (as shown below) on which I need to display two pictures, one on either side of the button text. Im battling to create the CSS that will work in both Firefox and Internet Explorer! (the button images are coming from a JQuery UI skin file) CSS button div{ width:16px; height:16px; background-image: url(images/ui-icons_d19405_256x240.png); } button div.leftImage{ background-position: -96px -112px; float: left; } button div.rightImage{ background-position: -64px -16px; float: right; } HTML <button><div class="leftPic"></div><span>Button Text</span><div class="rightPic"></div></button>

    Read the article

  • UL+CSS for grid layout

    - by nailxx
    Hi all, I have a server-generated html like: <ul> <li><!-- few nested elements that form a block --></li> <li><!-- few nested elements that form anaother block --></li> <li><!-- etc, X times --></li> </ul> All blocks have known width 200px and unknown height. I want <li> to be arranged in table-like fashion like this: What I have for now is following css: li { display: block; width: 200px; float: left; margin: 10px; } All is fine except that columns don't get equal height. And in example above block #4 “snatch” at #1 and the result isn't what I'm trying to achieve: Is there any pure-CSS cross-browser way that will allow grid layout I want and will not enforce markup change?

    Read the article

  • inherit properties and then change some on particular site (css)

    - by Radek
    I have three menus on this test web site. I am learning css and trying all the menus inherit all properties from menu class. The second one looks different and is not clickable. I am happy with the 3rd one, just want to make it horizontal and change its position bit. Could somebody tell me why the second menu is not click-able? how I can make the third menu vertical? I thought that display: block; for li of the 3rd menu would do the trick but I do not know the css path for that li.

    Read the article

  • CSS selector for the last occurrence of a class on a page

    - by snaken
    Is there a CSS selector for the last occurrence of a class on a page? Say i have this HTML <dd> <span> <a class="required" id="forename">foo</a> </span> </dd> <dd> <span> <a class="required" id="surname">bar</a> </span> </dd> Is there a CSS selector that would return the a tag with the ID of surname. Something like .required:last maybe? Will be using Prototype if that matters?

    Read the article

  • Implementation/interface inheritance design question.

    - by Neil G
    I would like to get the stackoverflow community's opinion on the following three design patterns. The first is implementation inheritance; the second is interface inheritance; the third is a middle ground. My specific question is: Which is best? implementation inheritance: class Base { X x() const = 0; void UpdateX(A a) { y_ = g(a); } Y y_; } class Derived: Base { X x() const { return f(y_); } } interface inheritance: class Base { X x() const = 0; void UpdateX(A a) = 0; } class Derived: Base { X x() const { return x_; } void UpdateX(A a) { x_ = f(g(a)); } X x_; } middle ground: class Base { X x() const { return x_; } void UpdateX(A a) = 0; X x_; } class Derived: Base { void UpdateX(A a) { x_ = f(g(a)); } } I know that many people prefer interface inheritance to implementation inheritance. However, the advantage of the latter is that with a pointer to Base, x() can be inlined and the address of x_ can be statically calculated.

    Read the article

  • Has inheritance become bad?

    - by mafutrct
    Personally, I think inheritance is a great tool, that, when applied reasonably, can greatly simplify code. However, I seems to me that many modern tools dislike inheritance. Let's take a simple example: Serialize a class to XML. As soon as inheritance is involved, this can easily turn into a mess. Especially if you're trying to serialize a derived class using the base class serializer. Sure, we can work around that. Something like a KnownType attribute and stuff. Besides being an itch in your code that you have to remember to update every time you add a derived class, that fails, too, if you receive a class from outside your scope that was not known at compile time. (Okay, in some cases you can still work around that, for instance using the NetDataContract serializer in .NET. Surely a certain advancement.) In any case, the basic principle still exists: Serialization and inheritance don't mix well. Considering the huge list of programming strategies that became possible and even common in the past decade, I feel tempted to say that inheritance should be avoided in areas that relate to serialization (in particular remoting and databases). Does that make sense? Or am messing things up? How do you handle inheritance and serialization?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  | Next Page >